Next Article in Journal
An Anti-Inflammatory 2,4-Cyclized-3,4-Secospongian Diterpenoid and Furanoterpene-Related Metabolites of a Marine Sponge Spongia sp. from the Red Sea
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Evaluation of 3D Printed Chitosan/Pectin Constructs for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marine-Derived Biologically Active Compounds for the Potential Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of the Invasive Seagrass Halophila stipulacea

1
Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Istituto Nazionale di Biologia, Ecologia e Biotecnologie Marine, Villa Comunale, 80121 Napoli, Italy
2
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
3
Unit of Immunology, IRCCS MultiMedica, 20138 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, 211000 Varese, Italy
5
Laboratory of Vascular Biology and Angiogenesis, IRCCS MultiMedica, 20138 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19010037
Submission received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 11 January 2021 / Accepted: 12 January 2021 / Published: 16 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and New Perspectives in Marine Biotechnology 2.0)

Abstract

:
Marine organisms with fast growth rates and great biological adaptive capacity might have biotechnological interests, since ecological competitiveness might rely on enhanced physiological or biochemical processes’ capability promoting protection, defense, or repair intracellular damages. The invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea, a non-indigenous species widespread in the Mediterranean Sea, belongs to this category. This is the premise to investigate the biotechnological interest of this species. In this study, we investigated the antioxidant activity in vitro, both in scavenging reactive oxygen species and in repairing damages from oxidative stress on the fibroblast human cell line WI-38. Together with the biochemical analysis, the antioxidant activity was characterized by the study of the expression of oxidative stress gene in WI-38 cells in presence or absence of the H. stipulacea extract. Concomitantly, the pigment pool of the extracts, as well as their macromolecular composition was characterized. This study was done separately on mature and young leaves. Results indicated that mature leaves exerted a great activity in scavenging reactive oxygen species and repairing damages from oxidative stress in the WI-38 cell line. This activity was paralleled to an enhanced carotenoids content in the mature leaf extracts and a higher carbohydrate contribution to organic matter. Our results suggest a potential of the old leaves of H. stipulacea as oxidative stress damage protecting or repair agents in fibroblast cell lines. This study paves the way to transmute the invasive H. stipulacea environmental threat in goods for human health.

1. Introduction

Antioxidants have a key role in counteracting free radicals, preventing or limiting damages in living organisms [1]. Exogeneous antioxidants are requested to enhance the protection or repairing processes, with a special regard on natural antioxidative compounds [2]. Photosynthetic organisms represent the most important source of natural products, providing health benefits [3], with plant-derived compounds used in clinical practice as anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, or other medicinal drugs [3,4]. Despite the high genetic and phenotypic diversity of algae and seagrasses, and their increasing biotechnological interests [5,6,7,8], marine photosynthetic organisms are less exploited than the land ones. In the marine scenario, the bioactive profile of seagrasses is less investigated than algae [9], although diverse studies addressed the potential of seagrasses, such as Halophila spp. [10,11].
However, it is not conceivable nor sustainable using seagrasses harvested from their habitats as a biotechnological resource, because of the damageable consequences on local ecosystem functioning.
Conversely, in case of invasive species this paradigm becomes not even more true. This is the case of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea in the Mediterranean sea [12,13], which belongs to the “100 Worst Invasive Alien Species in the Mediterranean” [14]. In the Mediterranean sea, H. stipulacea (Forsskål and Niebuhr) Ascherson (order Alismatales, family Hydrocharitaceae) is replacing the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa [15], concurrently with the ongoing “tropicalization” of the Mediterranean basin [16].
The potential bioactivity and biological properties of extracts from Halophila stipulacea was previously investigated [10,17]. This species—i.e., extracts from leaves or stems—exerted a reduction of lipid content in fatty acid-overloaded liver cells (steatosis) and displayed antifouling activity [17]. Moreover, ethanolic leaf extracts showed antioxidant and antibacterial activities [18].
In relation with these premises, ecologically negative properties relied on H. stipulacea invasiveness while being biotechnologically attracting; the aim of this study was to seek for human health bioactivity interests of H. stipulacea. The general hypothesis behind this study was to pave the way to transform this ecosystem-harmful species in benefit for humans. In this context, we investigated the interest of H. stipulacea as a source of antioxidant for scavenging and/or repairing oxidative stress carrying out in vitro analysis on human cell line. H. stipulacea was sampled in the Sicily coast (Mediterranean sea) in summer, i.e., when environmental conditions (high light, UVs, low nutrient concentration, high temperature) promote the activation of intracellular acclimation strategies coping with stressful external forcing [19,20]. The bioactivity of the seagrass was assessed on WI-38 lung fibroblast cell line, which is frequently used as an in vitro model for studying toxicity, oxidative stress, and aging-related disorders [21,22,23,24]. Bioactivity analysis was integrated with the pigments content and the macromolecular composition of the extracts. This investigation was done comparing the results obtained separately on old and young leaves of H. stipulacea, to address the role of leaf aging on the overall bioactive properties [25]. Indeed, old leaves displayed a significantly higher antioxidant capacity and ability to scavenge and repair epithelial cells from oxidative stress. This result is concomitant with the much higher content of carotenoids, mainly xanthophylls with photoprotective and/or antioxidant role. The interesting bioactivity pattern displayed by H. stipulacea makes this species potentially exploitable, with the objective to transform the actual H. stipulacea-induced environmental threat into a biotechnological output. However, the exploitation of H. stipulacea as a source of wellness, however, still requires technological development and strategy for the control and removal of this invasive species [26,27].

2. Results

2.1. 2,2,1-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

Ethanol/water mixture (3/1; v/v) H. stipulacea extracts from old leaf reached 85% of inhibition of free radical DPPH, displaying a significant (p < 0.001) higher antioxidant capacity than extracts from young leaf at any of the three tested extract concentrations (Figure 1a). The free radical scavenging of the young extracts was generally very low, with a maximum of 45% at the higher extract concentration (Figure 1b).

2.2. Cytotoxicity, Scavenging, and Repair Activities of the Leaf Extracts

While the old leaf extract of H. stipulacea induced a low cytotoxicity on WI-38 cells (Figure 2a) at the highest leaf extracts concentration, the young leaf extract displayed a slight cytotoxicity on WI-38 cells (Figure 2b) already at the lowest concentration, with a metabolically active cell percent decreasing at 83% (at 1 μg·mL−1) and at around 68% (at 10 and 100 μg·mL−1).
WI-38 cells injured by 10 mM of H2O2 for 48 h strongly lowered the metabolically active cell percent (48%). The pre-treatment of the human cell line with H. stipulacea extract helped cells to protect themselves against H2O2 injury. Indeed, the pre-treatment of WI-38 cells with old leaf extract enhanced the metabolically active cell percent to 82%, 102%, and 109% at the three extract concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1), respectively (Figure 3a). Adding young leaf extract to WI-38 cells as pre-treatment, the metabolically active cell percent enhanced in a lower way than with the old leaf extracts, “only” reaching 63%, 71%, and 81% for the three extract concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1), respectively (Figure 3b).
The positive control of the “cell viability recovery” experiment, represented by WI-38 cells injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 1 h displayed around 50% of metabolically active cells (Figure 4a,b). Recovery treatment applying concentrations of 1, 10, or 100 μg·mL−1 of the old leaf extract enhanced the percentage of metabolically active cells percent to 67, 97, and 100%, respectively (Figure 4a). Adding young leaf extract as potential recovery agent, the metabolically active cell percent increased to 71%, 81%, and 83%, respectively (Figure 4b).

2.3. Oxidative Stress Gene Expression in WI-38 Cells Treated with Old Leaf Extracts

In order to assess the intracellular response at gene expression level, we performed a PCR Array experiment by analyzing the 84 genes involved in oxidative stress defense. Here we showed the fold regulation of the key genes involved in antioxidant pathways, all genes analyzed are listed in Supplementary Materials (Tables S1 and S2). WI-38 cells treated with 10 mM of H2O2 exhibited an upregulation of the genes epoxide hydrolase 2 (EPHX2), eosinophil peroxidase (EPX), mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and serine peptidase inhibitor-Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), (3.0, 2.1, 7.0, 8.8, and 33.7 in fold regulation, respectively) and the downregulation of Cytochrome b-245 (CYBB) (−38 in fold regulation) (Tables S1 and S2). On the contrary, old leaf extract induced an up-regulation of the CYBB gene (3.9 in fold regulation) and a down-regulation of EPHX2, EPX, MBL2, MPO, and SPINK1 genes (−19, −2, −11.6, −6.9, and −10 in fold regulation, respectively) indicating that the oxidative stress response is not activated when cells were treated with H. stipulacea (Tables S1 and S2).
Interestingly when the WI-38 cells were pre-treated with old leaf extract before injury with 10 mM of H2O2, an upregulation of all genes involved in the antioxidant cell response analyzed, such as glutathione peroxidase 5 (GPX5, 2.3 fold regulation), keratin 1 (KRT1, 2.2 fold regulation), lactoperoxidase (LPO, 2.6 fold regulation), metallothionein 3 (MT3 2.0 fold regulation), NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5 2.8 fold regulation), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO 2.3 fold regulation) (Figure 5).
Cell recovery treatment with old leaf extract after the injury with H2O2 induced a significant increase in fold regulation of the genes glutathione peroxidase 5 (GPX5, 3.2 fold regulation), keratin 1 (KRT1, 3.4 fold regulation), lactoperoxidase (LPO, 17 fold regulation), metallothionein 3 (MT3 3.3 fold regulation), NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5 4.3 fold regulation), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO 16.7-fold regulation). These results probably indicated that H. stipulacea old leaf extract could be more therapeutic than preventive against peroxidative damage of the GSR gene (Figure 5 and Tables S1 and S2).

2.4. Pigments

Pigment composition was similar in old and young leaves: the main pigments revealed in H. stipulacea belong to the two photoprotective cycles, violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, and zeaxanthin (xanthophyll cycle), and the siphonein-siphonaxanthin cycle, together with other carotenoids neoxanthin, lutein, α- and β-carotenes, and the chlorophylls a and b (chl.a and chl.b). Their concentration significantly varied with leaf aging (Figure 6a,b). The concentrations of the xanthophyll-cycling pigments, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin, as well as siphonein and siphonaxanthin concentration pigments were significantly higher in old leaves than in the young ones (p < 0.001). Conversely, chl.a concentration was significantly higher in young than in old leaves (p < 0.01) while the α- and β-carotenes concentration was similar in young and old leaves (Figure 6a,b). Except for chl.b and the α- and β-carotenes, all the accessory pigments vs. chl.a ratios were significantly higher in old leaves compared to the young ones (p < 0.001; data not shown), with the photoprotective antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin displaying the greatest increase with leaf aging.

2.5. Macromolecular Composition

Protein, carbohydrate, and lipid concentrations in young leaves were significantly higher than in old ones (p < 0.05; Table 1). Protein concentrations decreased from 21.3 ± 0.5 to 8.2 ± 0.6, carbohydrates from 19 ± 0.6 to 10.9 ± 1.1, and lipids from 5.8 ± 0.1 to 1.6 ± 0.3 mg·g−1 in young and old leaves, respectively (Table 1).
Interestingly, the relative contribution of these three macromolecular families varied in old vs. young leaves. Aging enhanced the carbohydrates contribution which represented the dominant component (accounting for 52.6% of the total organic matter pool) followed by proteins and lipids (39.6% and 7.8%, respectively). Conversely, in young leaves, proteins represented the main macromolecular components contributing to 46.2 % of the total organic matter pool, followed by carbohydrates (41.2%) and lipids (12.6%).

3. Discussion

The seagrass H. stipulacea was selected as target in our study because of its capacity to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions and to out-compete native species in the Mediterranean Sea, where it is invasive [28,29,30,31]. The opportunism and/or competitiveness of organisms such as H. stipulacea is based on their great physiological and biochemical plasticity for maintaining high growth rate also under new (favorable) environmental conditions. This implies relevant biochemical energy conveyed toward growth as well as efficient processes to protect cells and repair damages in case of non-optimal environmental conditions. This is likely to occur even more during summer under environmental conditions (e.g., high light, UV radiations, low nutrient concentration, high temperature) that promote the onset of intracellular regulative strategies to cope with stressful external forcing [19,20]. Those characteristics enhance the role of organisms as putative targets for biotechnological prospecting to seek for bioactive natural compounds/extracts with human health benefits, such as antioxidants. Indeed, the invasive seaweed Sargassum muticum displayed higher DPPH and antioxidant activity than the native seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata in the coastal area of Portugal [32]. Also, results obtained in this study highlight the high potential of the seagrass H. stipulacea as a source of bioactive extracts able to counteract and repair fibroblast cells from induced-oxidative stress. DPPH free radical scavenging activity reported in our study for old leaf extracts of H. stipulacea is much higher than results reported from other seagrasses [18,32,33,34,35] and likely similar than those reported for Cymodocea rotundata [35].
While young leaf extracts are not attractive, old leaf ones are, conversely, biotechnologically appealing. Organismal ageing induces a senescence process that accentuates the modulation of physiology, biochemistry, and functioning of biological machinery [36]. For instance, the higher contribution of carbohydrates into the organic matter content, detected in our study, is a common feature in plants during ageing, potentially promoting or triggering senescence [37,38,39,40,41]. The decrease in the chlorophyll concentration in old leaves, as already observed [42] might induce a lowering of light energy transfer in the cells, that in turn would explain the lower organic matter content in aged leaves compared to the young leaves. Senescence is regulated by many processes [36] and by ROS, which acts as signaling for production of secondary metabolites involved in several defense and protective mechanisms [43,44]. Even though concentration of carotenoids might remain stable during ageing/senescence in some plants [45], growth stage of a photosynthetic organism notably affects the bioactive compounds content and antioxidant activity often increasing in aged biological material [20,46,47,48,49,50]. In H. stipulacea, the enhancement of antioxidant ability with leaf aging is paralleled to an almost all carotenoids increase and with the decrease in chl.a content. The significant increase in carotenoids with age might—at least in part—explain the enhanced antioxidant power of the extracts. Indeed, carotenoids, such as violaxanthin, neoxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin, lutein are epidemiologically correlated with a lower risk for several diseases and to have beneficial effects on eye health [51,52,53]. Additionally, H. stipulacea contains the keto-carotenoids siphonein and siphonaxanthin, exclusively present in aquatic photosynthetic organisms, as already found in green macroalgae such as Codium fragile, Caulerpa lentillifera, and Umbraulva japonica [54]. These pigments fill the role of maximizing the absorption of the green and blue-green wavelengths [47]. Moreover, they are known to act as defense agents against light stress [47], being active in photoprotection processes [20,48]. The two carotenoids siphonein and siphonaxanthin have been reported as bioactive compounds [55]. Siphonoxathin is also known to induce apoptosis in leukemia cells [55], with additional anti-angiogenic or anti-diabetic role [56,57].
The bioactivity of the old leaf extracts on human fibroblast cells is greatly promising with a recovery of cell viability at around 100% coping (protecting or recovering) with the stress due to H2O2 that caused a reduction in cell viability to 48%. This activity induced by the old leaf extracts involves a molecular response turned toward the cell protection and detoxification from peroxidative cell damages. The study of the oxidative stress gene expression patterns between cells treated with 10 mM H2O2 and those pre-treated or recovered with 10 μg·mL−1 extract reveals an interaction with the ROS metabolism, with an up-regulation of the oxidative stress responsive genes GPX5, KRT1, LPO, MT3, NOX5, and TPO during the recovery treatment. All these genes, together with CCL5 and MBL2 are known to activate intracellular detoxification pathways in response to oxidative stress, with the involvement of the peroxisome’s machinery [58]. In particular, antioxidant gene such as GPX5 displayed an opposite regulative expression behavior when the extract was added before and after H2O2 (Table S2). On the contrary, the up-regulation of EPHX2 with H2O2 is due to the fact that this gene codes for bifunctional enzyme in response to oxidative stress [59]. The recovery treatment with extract induces a lowering of EPHX2 gene expression until to be down-regulated at 10 μg·mL−1 (Table S2). This is probably due to the ability of the extract to scavenge the effect induced by H2O2, thereby reducing EPHX2 gene expression levels. Also, NOX5 involved in ROS metabolism is up-regulated by the extract as already reported in relation with the effects of vasoactive agents, growth factors, and pro-inflammatory cytokines protecting cells against oxidative stress [60]. This is linked to the function of this gene which encodes for a protein localized in the perinuclear and endoplasmic reticulum regions of cells and traffics to the cell membrane upon activation. Another relevant result—and effects of the old leaf extract—regards the up-regulation of LPO and TPO genes, both involved in the resistance against oxidative stress and preventing apoptotic cell death when they are expressed at high levels [61].
This study highlights the pro-active effect of H. stipulacea leaf extracts against damaged human cells or protecting them, owing to an induced-gene activation cascading effect. Advanced chemical investigations might further help in relating the reported bioactivity to the compounds’ diversity collected in the extract, even though the role of carotenoids—in term of quantity and diversity, the latter enhancing the bioactive ability of the extract—is well-known.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Halophila Stipulacea Sampling and Leaf Collection

Rhizomes of H. stipulacea were collected in July 2016 in the harbor of Castellammare del Golfo in the Mediterranean Sea (38°01′45.2′′ N, 12°52′51.8′′ E) at 0.5 m depth. The seagrass formed a dense patch of c.a. 1.5 m diameter on muddy sand bottom, exposed to direct sunlight, in an area characterized by urban run-off. Three seagrasses were sampled, and after collection, the fronds were gently rinsed in seawater to remove the sediment particles and associated epibionts and transported in seawater tanks to the laboratory for the subsequent analyses.
Young and mature old leaves were separated, the former being closer to the apex than the old leaves (more toward the bottom). From each seagrass, three young and mature leaves were collected and pooled together.

4.2. Preparation of Ethanol/Water Extracts from Halophila Stipulacea Leaves

Extracts for pigment analysis and biological assays were obtained from freeze-dried young and old leaves of H. stipulacea, according to Sansone et al. [62] at room temperature, under dark and N2 atmosphere to avoid oxidation during procedure. The fresh and dry weight of the leaf samples was measured, with a ratio between dry and fresh ≈0.135 (±0.030).
One gram of dried leaves was placed in 1 mL of ethanol/water mixture (3/1; v/v) for 30 min in dark condition and mechanically disrupted with a pestle. The mixture was separated by centrifugation at 4500× g for 15 min, at 4 °C, and the upper layer was transferred to a clean tube. Pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of ethanol/water mixture to repeat the procedure, maximizing the extraction yield. Hydroalcoholic extracts were dried in a rotary vacuum evaporator (Buchi rotavapor R-114) and the dried extracts were stored at −20 °C.

4.3. Pigment HPLC Analysis

Pigment analysis was conducted by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), according to the method described in Smerilli et al. [63]. Prior to injection into the HPLC, 250 µL of an ion pairing agent (ammonium acetate 1 mol·L−1, final concentration of 0.33 mol·L−1) was added to 0.5 mL of the lyophilized extracts and incubated for 5 min in the dark at 4 °C. These samples were then injected in the 50 µL loop of the Hewlett Packard series 1100 HPLC (Hewlett Packard, Wilmington, NC, USA), equipped with a reversed-phase column (C8 Kinetex column; 50 mm × 4.6 mm; 2.6 µm particle size, Phenomenex®, Torrance, CA, USA). The temperature of the column was steadily maintained at 20 °C and the flow rate of the mobile phase was set up at 1.7 mL·min–1. The mobile phase was composed of two solvent mixtures: “A”—methanol/aqueous ammonium acetate (70/30, v/v); “B”—methanol. During the elution (12 min), a gradient between the solvents was programmed: 75% A (0 min), 50% A (1 min), 0% A (8 min) isocratic for 3 min. Chlorophylls and carotenoids were detected by diode-array spectroscopy (spectrum data collected in the range 350–750 nm) using a Hewlett Packard photodiode array detector, model DAD series 1100 and absorbance chromatogram was reported at 440 nm. Chlorophylls, and their degradation products were also detected by fluorescence using a Hewlett Packard standard FLD cell series 1100 with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 407 nm and 665 nm, respectively. Identification and quantification of pigments were carried out using pigment standards from the D.H.I. Water & Environment (Horsholm, Denmark).

4.4. Macromolecular Composition of the Extracts

The concentration of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids was determined for the young and old leaves which were previously freeze dried. Total protein concentrations were determined according to Lowry et al. [64] and modified [65,66] to compensate for phenol interference and are expressed as bovine serum albumin (BSA) equivalents. Total carbohydrate concentrations, expressed in glucose equivalents, were obtained according to the Gerchacov and Hatcher [67] protocol based on the phenol and concentrated sulfuric acid reaction with saccharides. Total lipids were extracted in chloroform: methanol (1:1, vol:vol) [68], and the resulting fraction, after evaporation in a dry hot bath at 80 to 100 °C for 20 min, was quantified according to the sulfuric acid carbonization procedure [69]. Total lipids were expressed in tripalmitine equivalents. Protein, carbohydrate, and lipid concentrations were expressed as mg·g−1 of dry weight.

4.5. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity

Three concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, and 100 µg/mL) were tested for the radical scavenger assay. These samples were mixed in a 96-well plate with a final concentration of DPPH of 0.1 mM in methanol, allowed to react for 30 min in the dark. The methanol solution was used as negative control. At the end of incubation, absorbance was measured at 517 nm, using a microplate reader. The scavenging assay was performed in triplicate. Results were presented as a percentage of DPPH reduction with respect to the methanol negative control.

4.6. Human WI-38 Cell Line Culture and Treatments

WI-38 is a diploid human cell line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 3-month-gestation aborted female fetus. This cell line was isolated by Leonard Hayflick in the 1960s and represents an easy cell model of normal human tissue [70]. WI-38 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC® CCL-75™) and grown in MEM (Eagle’s minimal essential medium) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units mL−1 penicillin, 100 units mL−1 streptomycin, 2mM of L-glutamine, and non-essential amino acids (NEAA, 2 mM) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C.
WI-38 cells (2 × 103 cells well−1) were seeded in 96-well plates and kept overnight for attachment. The ethanol/water dried extracts, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, final concentration 1%), were used for cell treatments. The toxicity of vehicle (DMSO) was tested previously determining that the IC50 is around 7%, lower concentrations did not affect WI38 cell viability.
Seventy percent confluent cells were treated with young leaf- and old leaf- ethanol/water extracts (three replicates for each) at 1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1 for 48 h, in order to assess cytotoxicity (see below) of the extracts and to run the experiments.
In one experiment, cells were pre-treated with the extracts at three concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) for 2 h and then injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 48 h. This experiment aimed to assess the potential scavenging activity of the extracts. The positive control was obtained injuring cells with only 10 mM of H2O2 for 48 h.
Another experiment was carried out as follow: the WI-38 cells were pre-injured for 2 h with 10 mM of H2O2 and then recovered with the extracts at the same three concentrations as before (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) for 48 h. This experimental approach aimed to assess the potential repair activity of the extracts after cell oxidative damage. In this case, the positive control corresponded to pre-injuring cells for 2 h with 10 mM of H2O2 and then recovered with only culture medium.

4.7. Cell Viability Assays

Cytotoxicity, scavenging, and repair activity of the ethanol/water extracts were tested using the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide, Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) on the WI-38 cell line [71]. After 48 h of treatment, WI-38 cells were incubated with 10 µL (5 mg·mL−1) of MTT and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The resulting formazan crystals produced by viable cells were dissolved with 100 µL of isopropyl alcohol. The absorbance was recorded on a microplate reader at a wavelength of 570 nm. Effect of the extracts was evaluated as percent of metabolically active cells estimated as the ratio between absorbance of each sample and absorbance of control (untreated cells). Three different extracts for the two leaf categories (young vs. mature) were analyzed.

4.8. RNA Extraction and Real-Time qPCR

WI-38 cells (2 × 106 cells), used for RNA extraction and analysis were seeded in Petri dishes (100 mm diameter). WI-38 cells were treated with old leaf extract (concentration at 10 μg·mL−1, displaying great repair and scavenging activities without any cytotoxic effect) and with 10 mM H2O2 as cellular injury. Experimental strategy was the following: WI-38 cells treated with the leaf extract (3 h); WI-38 cells treated with the leaf extract (2 h) and then injured with H2O2 (1 h); WI-38 cells injured with H2O2 (1 h) and recovered with the leaf extract (2 h). A negative control was setup with WI-38 cells without any treatment. Sampling for gene expression analysis was done after 3 h of treatment. Once the treatment was over, WI-38 cells were washed in the Petri dish by adding cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and rocking gently. Cells were lysed in the Petri dish by adding 1 mL of Trisure Reagent (Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA) and RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration and purity were assessed using the nanophotomer NanodroP. The reverse transcription reaction was carried out with the RT2 first strand kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germania), and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using the RT2 Profiler PCR Arrays kit (Cat. No. PAHS-065Y, Qiagen). Plates were run on a ViiA7, Standard Fast PCR Cycling protocol with 10 µL reaction volumes. Cycling conditions were 1 cycle initiation at 95 °C for 10 min followed by amplification for 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Amplification data were collected via ViiA 7 RUO Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The cycle threshold (Ct)-values were analyzed with PCR array data analysis online software (GeneGlobe Data Analysis Center, http://pcrdataanalysis.sabiosciences.com/pcr/arrayanalysis.php, Qiagen). Real time data were expressed as fold expression, describing the changes in gene expression between treated cells and untreated cells (control). The expression of 84 genes involved in oxidative stress was analyzed (Table S1). Control genes for real-time qPCR were actin-beta (ACTB), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT1), and ribosomal protein large P0 (RPLP0), the expression of which remained constant.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments have been carried out in triplicates. Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Statistical significative differences (at least p < 0.05) were assessed comparing different treatments and/or between old and young leaf results applying Student’s t-test (mean comparison) or Fisher-Snedecor test (variance comparison) using PAST3 software [72].

5. Conclusions

Our study lays the foundation for a potential biotechnological application of the invasive seagrass H. stipulacea that might fill the role of natural provider of antioxidant agent acting against oxidative stress in fibroblast cell lines. In agreement with other previous reports [10,11,17], this species might represent a novel valuable source for human health benefits. This might be a great opportunity since this species is a threat for coastal marine ecosystems because of its invasiveness. A careful harvesting of H. stipulacea from nature could bring up a synergy between the commercial exploitation for human wellbeing of the invader in areas where the species is not native and benefits the conservation of the natural capital and ecosystem health.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/19/1/37/s1. Table S1: List of the 84 oxidative stress-relied genes of the WI-38 cell line analyzed in our study (from: RT² Profiler™ PCR Array Human Oxidative Stress Plus (Product no. 330231; Cat. No. PAHS-065Y)). Table S2: Oxidative stress-relied genes of the WI-38 cell line upregulated (fold regulation > 2) or downregulated (fold regulation < −2) during treatments with old leaf extract or H2O2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S., L.M., A.A. and C.B.; data curation, T.V.F., A.B., D.M.N. and C.B.; formal analysis, C.G.; funding acquisition, C.S. and C.B.; investigation, C.S., C.G., T.V.F. and A.B.; methodology, C.G., M.L.M. and T.V.F.; supervision, C.B.; visualization, A.D.; writing—original draft, C.G.; writing—review and editing, C.S., M.L.M., L.M., A.D., D.M.N., A.A. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Ida Orefice in the HPLC analysis. We acknowledge the three reviewers and the Editor for their comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pandel, R.; Poljšak, B.; Godic, A.; Dahmane, R. Skin Photoaging and the Role of Antioxidants in Its Prevention. ISRN Dermatol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. McChesney, J.D.; Venkataraman, S.K.; Henri, J.T. Plant natural products: Back to the future or into extinction? Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cragg, G.M.; Grothaus, P.G.; Newman, D.J. Impact of natural products on developing new anti-cancer agents. Chem. Rev. 2009, 9, 3012–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sansone, C.; Nuzzo, G.; Galasso, C.; Casotti, R.; Fontana, A.; Romano, G.; Ianora, A. The Marine Dinoflagellate Alexandrium andersoni Induces Cell Death in Lung and Colorectal Tumor Cell Lines. Mar. Biotechnol. 2018, 20, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Galasso, C.; Nuzzo, G.; Brunet, C.; Ianora, A.; Sardo, A.; Fontana, A.; Sansone, C. The marine dinoflagellate alexandrium minutum activates a mitophagic pathway in human lung cancer cells. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Zidorn, C. Secondary metabolites of seagrasses (Alismatales and Potamogetonales; Alismatidae): Chemical diversity, bioactivity, and ecological function. Phytochemistry 2016, 124, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rocha, D.H.A.; Seca, A.M.L.; Pinto, D.C.G.A. Seaweed secondary metabolites in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Thomas, F.; Lundqvist, L.C.E.; Jam, M.; Jeudy, A.; Barbeyron, T.; Sandström, C.; Michel, G.; Czjzek, M. Comparative characterization of two marine alginate lyases from zobellia galactanivorans reveals distinct modes of action and exquisite adaptation to their natural substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 23021–23037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yuvaraj, N.; Kanmani, P.; Satishkumar, R.; Paari, A.; Pattukumar, V.; Arul, V. Seagrass as a potential source of natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents. Pharm. Biol. 2012, 50, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Saranya, K.; Balamani, K.; Kokila, P.; Maruthupandian, A.; Viji, M. Biochemical and bioactive potential of seagrass Halophila ovalis (R. Brown) J.D. Hooker and Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb. Ex solms) Asch. Int. J. Adv. Interdiscip. Res. 2017, 4, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manh Nguyen, H.; Savva, I.; Kleitou, P.; Kletou, D.; Lima, F.P.; Sapir, Y.; Winters, G. Seasonal dynamics of native and invasive Halophila stipulacea populations—A case study from the northern Gulf of Aqaba and the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Aquat. Bot. 2020, 162, 103205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Winters, G.; Beer, S.; Willette, D.A.; Viana, I.G.; Chiquillo, K.L.; Beca-Carretero, P.; Villamayor, B.; Azcárate-García, T.; Shem-Tov, R.; Mwabvu, B.; et al. The tropical seagrass Halophila stipulacea: Reviewing what we know from its native and invasive habitats, alongside identifying knowledge gaps. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. ISSG Spec. Group SSC World Conserv. Union IUCN 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sghaier, Y.R.; Zakhama-Sraieb, R.; Benamer, I.; Charfi-Cheikhrouha, F. Occurrence of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Hydrocharitaceae) in the southern Mediterranean Sea. Bot. Mar. 2011, 54, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borghini, M.; Bryden, H.; Schroeder, K.; Sparnocchia, S.; Vetrano, A. The Mediterranean is becoming saltier. Ocean Sci. 2014, 10, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mabrouk, S.B.; Reis, M.; Sousa, M.L.; Ribeiro, T.; Almeida, J.R.; Pereira, S.; Antunes, J.; Rosa, F.; Vasconcelos, V.; Achour, L.; et al. The Marine Seagrass Halophila stipulacea as a Source of Bioactive Metabolites against Obesity and Biofouling. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kannan Rengasamy, R.R.; Rajasekaran, A.; Micheline, G.D.; Perumal, A. Antioxidant activity of seagrasses of the Mandapam coast, India. Pharm. Biol. 2012, 50, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brunet, C.; Brylinski, J.M.; Lemoine, Y. In situ variations of the xanthophylls diatoxanthin and diadinoxanthin—Photoadaptation and relationships with a hydrodynamical system in the eastern English Channel. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raniello, R.; Lorenti, M.; Brunet, C.; Buia, M.C. Photoacclimation of the invasive alga Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea to depth and daylight patterns and a putative new role for siphonaxanthin. Mar. Ecol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Toussaint, O.; Medrano, E.E.; Von Zglinicki, T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) of human diploid fibroblasts and melanocytes. Exp. Gerontol. 2000, 35, 927–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000, 408, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Seo, H.R.; Choi, M.J.; Choi, J.M.; Ko, J.C.; Ko, J.Y.; Cho, E.J. Malvidin Protects WI-38 Human Fibroblast Cells Against Stress-induced Premature Senescence. J. Cancer Prev. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wolf, F.I.; Torsello, A.; Covacci, V.; Fasanella, S.; Montanari, M.; Boninsegna, A.; Cittadini, A. Oxidative DNA damage as a marker of aging in WI-38 human fibroblasts. Exp. Gerontol. 2002, 102, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Tussenbroek, B.I.; van Katwijk, M.M.; Bouma, T.J.; van der Heide, T.; Govers, L.L.; Leuven, R.S.E.W. Non-native seagrass Halophila stipulacea forms dense mats under eutrophic conditions in the Caribbean. J. Sea Res. 2016, 115, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hyytiäinen, K.; Lehtiniemi, M.; Niemi, J.K.; Tikka, K. An optimization framework for addressing aquatic invasive species. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 91, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beer, S.; Waisel, Y. Effects of light and pressure on photosynthesis in two seagrasses. Aquat. Bot. 1982, 13, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schwarz, A.M.; Hellblom, F. The photosynthetic light response of Halophila stipulacea growing along a depth gradient in the Gulf of Aqaba, the Red Sea. Aquat. Bot. 2002, 74, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharon, Y.; Silva, J.; Santos, R.; Runcie, J.W.; Chernihovsky, M.; Beer, S. Photosynthetic responses of Halophila stipulacea to a light gradient. II. Acclimations following transplantation. Aquat. Bot. 2009, 7, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mejia, A.Y.; Rotini, A.; Lacasella, F.; Bookman, R.; Thaller, M.C.; Shem-Tov, R.; Winters, G.; Migliore, L. Assessing the ecological status of seagrasses using morphology, biochemical descriptors and microbial community analyses. A study in Halophila stipulacea (Forsk.) Aschers meadows in the northern Red Sea. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 60, 1150–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Santos, F.; Monteiro, J.P.; Duarte, D.; Melo, T.; Lopes, D.; da Costa, E.; Domingues, M.R. Unraveling the lipidome and antioxidant activity of native bifurcaria bifurcata and invasive sargassum muticum seaweeds: A lipid perspective on how systemic intrusion may present an opportunity. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kannan, R.R.R.; Arumugam, R.; Anantharaman, P. In vitro antioxidant activities of ethanol extract from Enhalus acoroides (L.F.) Royle. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2010, 898–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Neelima, C.S.S.; Seenivasan, R. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity of Selected Seagrasses from South East Coast of India. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 3, 950–956. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeyapragash, D.; Subhashini, P.; Raja, S.; Abirami, K.; Thangaradjou, T. Evaluation of In-vitro Antioxidant Activity of Seagrasses: Signals for Potential Alternate Source. Free Radic. Antioxid. 2016, 6, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pushpa Bharathi, N.; Amudha, P.; Vanitha, V. Sea grasses—Novel marine nutraceuticals. Int. J. Pharm. Bio. Sci. 2016, 7, 567–573. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gullón, B.; Eibes, G.; Moreira, M.T.; Herrera, R.; Labidi, J.; Gullón, P. Yerba mate waste: A sustainable resource of antioxidant compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 113, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santhanam, R.; Santhanam, R.; Suleria, H.; Santhanam, R.; Santhanam, R.; Suleria, H. Biology and Ecology of Pharmaceutical Marine Plants. Biol. Ecol. Pharm. Mar. Plants 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Woo, H.R.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Lim, P.O. Plant senescence: How plants know when and how to die. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Drew, E.A. Factors affecting photosynthesis and its seasonal variation in the seagrasses Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Aschers, and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile in the mediterranean. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1978, 31, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pourtau, N.; Jennings, R.; Pelzer, E.; Pallas, J.; Wingler, A. Effect of sugar-induced senescence on gene expression and implications for the regulation of senescence in Arabidopsis. Planta 2006, 224, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Socaci, S.A.; Rugină, D.O.; Diaconeasa, Z.M.; Pop, O.L.; Fărcaș, A.C.; Păucean, A.; Tofană, M.; Pintea, A. Antioxidant Compounds Recovered from Food Wastes. Funct. Food Improv. Health Adequate Food 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wingler, A.; Purdy, S.; MacLean, J.A.; Pourtau, N. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. Proc. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wingler, A.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Fischer, A.M. Sugars, senescence, and ageing in plants and heterotrophic organisms. Proc. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Van Doorn, W.G. Is the onset of senescence in leaf cells of intact plants due to low or high sugar levels? J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 57, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sánchez-Quiles, D.; Tovar-Sánchez, A. Sunscreens as a source of hydrogen peroxide production in coastal waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 9037–9042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Raniello, R.; Lorenti, M.; Brunet, C.; Buia, M.C. Photosynthetic plasticity of an invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa in a coastal Mediterranean area: Light harvesting capacity and seasonal acclimation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Uragami, C.; Galzerano, D.; Gall, A.; Shigematsu, Y.; Meisterhans, M.; Oka, N.; Iha, M.; Fujii, R.; Robert, B.; Hashimoto, H. Light-dependent conformational change of neoxanthin in a siphonous green alga, Codium intricatum, revealed by Raman spectroscopy. Photosynth. Res. 2014, 121, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sugawara, T.; Ganesan, P.; Li, Z.; Manabe, Y.; Hirata, T. Siphonaxanthin, a green algal carotenoid, as a novel functional compound. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3660–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jenkins, G.I.; Baker, N.R.; Woolhouse, H.W. Changes in chlorophyll content and organization during senescence of the primary leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. In relation to photosynthetic electron transport. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32, 1009–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stahl, W.; Sies, H. Bioactivity and protective effects of natural carotenoids. Proc. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2005, 1740, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ma, L.; Lin, X.M. Effects of lutein and zeaxanthin on aspects of eye health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Galasso, C.; Gentile, A.; Orefice, I.; Ianora, A.; Bruno, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Sansone, C.; Albini, A.; Brunet, C. Microalgal derivatives as potential nutraceutical and food supplements for human health: A focus on cancer prevention and interception. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Ricketts, T.R. The structures of siphonein and siphonaxanthin from Codium fragile. Phytochemistry 1971, 10, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ganesan, P.; Noda, K.; Manabe, Y.; Ohkubo, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Maoka, T.; Sugawara, T.; Hirata, T. Siphonaxanthin, a marine carotenoid from green algae, effectively induces apoptosis in human leukemia (HL-60) cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1810, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ganesan, P.; Matsubara, K.; Ohkubo, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Noda, K.; Sugawara, T.; Hirata, T. Anti-angiogenic effect of siphonaxanthin from green alga, Codium fragile. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 1140–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Li, Z.-S.; Noda, K.; Fujita, E.; Manabe, Y.; Hirata, T.; Sugawara, T. The Green Algal Carotenoid Siphonaxanthin Inhibits Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes and the Accumulation of Lipids in White Adipose Tissue of KK-Ay Mice. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Izumi, M.; Ishida, H. The changes of leaf carbohydrate contents as a regulator of autophagic degradation of chloroplasts via rubisco-containing bodies during leaf senescence. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 685–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Leone, A.; Roca, M.S.; Ciardiello, C.; Costantini, S.; Budillon, A. Oxidative Stress Gene Expression Profile Correlates with Cancer Patient Poor Prognosis: Identification of Crucial Pathways Might Select Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2597581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Touyz, R.M.; Anagnostopoulou, A.; Rios, F.; Montezano, A.C.; Camargo, L.L. NOX5: Molecular biology and pathophysiology. Exp. Physiol. 2019, 104, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Taso, O.V.; Philippou, A.; Moustogiannis, A.; Zevolis, E.; Koutsilieris, M. Lipid peroxidation products and their role in neurodegenerative diseases. Ann. Res. Hosp. 2019, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sansone, C.; Galasso, C.; Orefice, I.; Nuzzo, G.; Luongo, E.; Cutignano, A.; Romano, G.; Brunet, C.; Fontana, A.; Esposito, F.; et al. The green microalga Tetraselmis suecica reduces oxidative stress and induces repairing mechanisms in human cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Smerilli, A.; Balzano, S.; Maselli, M.; Blasio, M.; Orefice, I.; Galasso, C.; Sansone, C.; Brunet, C. Antioxidant and photoprotection networking in the coastal diatom skeletonema marinoi. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hartree, E.F. Determination of protein: A modification of the lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Anal. Biochem. 1972, 48, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rice, D. The Detritus Nitrogen Problem: New Observations and Perspectives from Organic Geochemistry. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1982, 9, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gerchakov, S.M.; Hatcher, P.G. Improved Technique for Analysis of Carbohydrates in Sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1972, 17, 938–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Marsh, J.B.; Weinstein, D.B. Simple charring method for determination of lipids. J. Lipid Res. 1966, 7, 574–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Olshansky, S.J.; Hayflick, L. The Role of the WI-38 Cell Strain in Saving Lives and Reducing Morbidity. AIMS Public Health 2017, 4, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. DPPH scavenging activity of the old (a) and young (b) leaf extracts of H. stipulacea at three concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1). Values represent the % of inhibition of free radical DPPH. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. All means were significantly different from each other (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. DPPH scavenging activity of the old (a) and young (b) leaf extracts of H. stipulacea at three concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1). Values represent the % of inhibition of free radical DPPH. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. All means were significantly different from each other (p < 0.01).
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were treated with three concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) of the extracts for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for all the three concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were treated with three concentrations (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) of the extracts for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for all the three concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001).
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g002
Figure 3. Cell protection activity of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were pre-treated for two hours with three concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) and then injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for all the three concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Cell protection activity of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were pre-treated for two hours with three concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) and then injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for all the three concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001).
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g003
Figure 4. Cell viability recovery of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 2 h and then recovered with three concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for the two greatest leaf extract concentrations (10 and 100 μg·mL−1) were significantly different between old and young leaves (p < 0.001). No significant difference (p > 0.05) between old and young leaf extracts at the lowest concentration (1 μg·mL−1).
Figure 4. Cell viability recovery of old (a) and young (b) leaf extract of Halophila stipulacea on the WI38 cell line. The WI-38 cells were injured with 10 mM of H2O2 for 2 h and then recovered with three concentrations of the extracts (1, 10, and 100 μg·mL−1) for 48 h. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The means for the two greatest leaf extract concentrations (10 and 100 μg·mL−1) were significantly different between old and young leaves (p < 0.001). No significant difference (p > 0.05) between old and young leaf extracts at the lowest concentration (1 μg·mL−1).
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g004
Figure 5. Effect of old leaf extract (10 μg mL−1) on the regulation of oxidative stress gene expression in H2O2-treated human normal lung fibroblasts (WI-38). WI-38 cells treated with the old leaf extract and then injured with H2O2 (cell protection activity; blue bars) and WI-38 treated with H2O2 and then with the old leaf extract (cell recovery treatment; orange bars). Expression values greater or lower than a two-fold difference with respect to the controls were considered significant (horizontal line indicates the ± two-fold differences with respect to controls). Data are shown as mean ± S.D.
Figure 5. Effect of old leaf extract (10 μg mL−1) on the regulation of oxidative stress gene expression in H2O2-treated human normal lung fibroblasts (WI-38). WI-38 cells treated with the old leaf extract and then injured with H2O2 (cell protection activity; blue bars) and WI-38 treated with H2O2 and then with the old leaf extract (cell recovery treatment; orange bars). Expression values greater or lower than a two-fold difference with respect to the controls were considered significant (horizontal line indicates the ± two-fold differences with respect to controls). Data are shown as mean ± S.D.
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g005
Figure 6. Pigment analysis in young and old leaves of H. stipulacea. (a) Concentrations (μg·g−1 dry biomass) of chlorophylls a and b; (b) concentrations (μg·g−1 dry biomass) of violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin, neoxantin, lutein, siphonein, siphonaxanthin, α- and β-carotenes. Values are reported as means of triplicates with standard deviation. All pigment concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001), except violaxanthin, α- and β-carotenes (p > 0.05).
Figure 6. Pigment analysis in young and old leaves of H. stipulacea. (a) Concentrations (μg·g−1 dry biomass) of chlorophylls a and b; (b) concentrations (μg·g−1 dry biomass) of violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin, neoxantin, lutein, siphonein, siphonaxanthin, α- and β-carotenes. Values are reported as means of triplicates with standard deviation. All pigment concentrations were significantly different between old and young leaf extracts (p < 0.001), except violaxanthin, α- and β-carotenes (p > 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00037 g006
Table 1. Protein, carbohydrate, and lipid concentrations (mg·g−1 dry leaf) of young and old leaves of Halophila stipulacea. Values are reported as mean ± S.D.
Table 1. Protein, carbohydrate, and lipid concentrations (mg·g−1 dry leaf) of young and old leaves of Halophila stipulacea. Values are reported as mean ± S.D.
ProteinsCarbohydratesLipids
Young leaves21.3 ± 0.519.0 ± 0.65.8 ± 0.1
Old leaves8.2 ± 0.610.9 ± 1.11.6 ± 0.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sansone, C.; Galasso, C.; Lo Martire, M.; Fernández, T.V.; Musco, L.; Dell’Anno, A.; Bruno, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Albini, A.; Brunet, C. In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of the Invasive Seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19010037

AMA Style

Sansone C, Galasso C, Lo Martire M, Fernández TV, Musco L, Dell’Anno A, Bruno A, Noonan DM, Albini A, Brunet C. In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of the Invasive Seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19010037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sansone, Clementina, Christian Galasso, Marco Lo Martire, Tomás Vega Fernández, Luigi Musco, Antonio Dell’Anno, Antonino Bruno, Douglas M. Noonan, Adriana Albini, and Christophe Brunet. 2021. "In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of the Invasive Seagrass Halophila stipulacea" Marine Drugs 19, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19010037

APA Style

Sansone, C., Galasso, C., Lo Martire, M., Fernández, T. V., Musco, L., Dell’Anno, A., Bruno, A., Noonan, D. M., Albini, A., & Brunet, C. (2021). In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of the Invasive Seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Marine Drugs, 19(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19010037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop