Next Article in Journal
Expression and Characterization of a Novel Cold-Adapted Chitosanase from Marine Renibacterium sp. Suitable for Chitooligosaccharides Preparation
Next Article in Special Issue
Heptapeptide Isolated from Isochrysis zhanjiangensis Exhibited Anti-Photoaging Potential via MAPK/AP-1/MMP Pathway and Anti-Apoptosis in UVB-Irradiated HaCaT Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Halophilic Carotenoids and Breast Cancer: From Salt Marshes to Biomedicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation of p53 Activity by (+)-Epiloliolide Isolated from Ulva lactuca
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 19
Issue 11
10.3390/md19110595
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mitosis Inhibitors Induce Massive Accumulation of Phytoene in the Microalga Dunaliella salina

by
Yanan Xu
and
Patricia J. Harvey
*
Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(11), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110595
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 15 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antiphotoaging and Photoprotective Compounds from Marine Organisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phytoene is a colourless natural carotenoid that absorbs UV light and provides antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities as well as protection against photodamage. It is therefore valued for its skin health and aesthetic benefits by the cosmetic industry, as well as by the health food sector. The halotolerant green microalga Dunaliella salina is one of the richest sources of natural carotenoids. We have previously investigated the over-production of phytoene in D. salina after cultivation with the well-characterised mitosis inhibitor, chlorpropham. In this study, 15 herbicides with different modes of action were tested for their potential to promote phytoene accumulation. All herbicides showed different levels of capabilities to support phytoene over-production in D. salina. Most significantly, the two mitosis inhibitors tested in this study, propyzamide and chlorpropham, showed similar capacities to support the over-production of phytoene by D. salina cultures as phytoene desaturase inhibitors. The cellular content of phytoene increased by over 10-fold within 48 h of treatment with the mitosis inhibitors compared to untreated cultures. Results indicate a general effect of mitosis inhibitors on phytoene accumulation in D. salina. Furthermore, red light was found to significantly enhance the phytoene yield when used in combination with effective inhibitor treatments. Red light can be applied to maximize the production of phytoene from D. salina.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Phytoene (C40 H64, (6E,10E,14E,16E,18E,22E,26E)-2,6,10,14,19,23,27,31-octamethyldotriaconta-2,6,10,14,16,18,22,26,30-nonaene) is a natural carotenoid and a rarity among naturally synthesized carotenoids, which are tetraterpenoids with a common C40 backbone of isoprenoid units. Phytoene is colourless and has a lower number (three) of conjugated double bonds compared to other coloured carotenoids that have at least ten conjugated double bonds [1]. Phytoene is the product of the first committed reaction of carotenogenesis, but a series of redox reactions normally converts it to carotenes rapidly [1]. Natural carotenoids have been reported to reduce the risks of cataracts, macular degeneration, neurodegeneration and some cancers because of their strong antioxidant capacity [2,3]. Like other carotenoids, phytoene has shown antioxidative effects that help defend against oxidative stress in humans and also show anti-inflammatory activity [4]. Furthermore, phytoene absorbs UV light maximally at 276, 286 and 297 nm in methanol/MTBE as solvent and can potentially protect against UV damage and diseases that are caused by harmful free radicals [5]. Phytoene is therefore valued in the cosmetic industry for its skin health and aesthetic benefits as well as in the health food industry. Moreover, phytoene shows higher bio-availability than other coloured carotenoids because it is released more efficiently from the food matrix, which is likely to occur because of its chemical structure and distribution in the food matrix [6].
In plants and algae, the first committed step in carotenoid biosynthesis is the chain-elongating condensation reaction of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (C20) to form 15-cis phytoene (C40), which is the first carotenoid product in the pathway [7]. This step is catalysed by phytoene synthase (PSY) and is considered a rate-limiting step of carotenogenesis [8]. The subsequent steps involve two desaturation reactions catalysed by phytoene desaturase (PDS), by ζ-carotene desaturase (ZDS) and the isomerization of the cis form to the trans form by carotenoid isomerase (CrtISO) to form all-trans lycopene [9]. All-trans lycopene is then cyclized into either β-carotene or α-carotene and catalysed by different groups of lycopene cyclases (LYC) [10]. The hydroxylation of β-carotene or α-carotene forms the xanthophyll products, which include zeaxanthin, antheraxanthin, violaxanthin and lutein, for further synthesis of their derivatives. The scheme in Figure 1 shows the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway and the key enzymes involved.
These reactions are ordered on membranes; an interruption of any one reaction leads to the accumulation of a metabolite from the corresponding precursor step and changes the carotenoid cellular composition. PDS is the most-used target for phytoene accumulation. It catalyses the oxidation of 15-cis phytoene to 9,15-di-cis phytofluene and 9,15,9′-tri-cis-z-carotene phytofluene in two sequential reactions which are coupled to the activity of a plastidial terminal oxidase (PTOX). These reactions use, respectively, plastoquinone as an intermediate electron acceptor and oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor. Consequently, PDS is redox-controlled and dependent on the redox state of the plastoquinone pool regulated by PTOX and oxygen. Plastoquinone mimics have been used successfully to induce the accumulation of phytoene in plant or algal cells; they bind competitively to the plastoquinone binding site of PDS, block phytoene desaturation and synthesis of 9,15-di-cis phytofluene and simultaneously reduce chloroplastic oxygen dissipation via PTOX [11,12,13,14].
The natural cellular levels of phytoene from different sources vary over a wide range. Among the most commonly known carotenoid-rich food sources, tomatoes contain the highest phytoene content (~5 mg/kg fresh weight) [5]. Phytoene products sourced from tomatoes have been commercialised in the cosmetic industry such as PhytoflORAL® (Frutarom Industries Ltd., Herzliya, Israel). Algae are another potential source of the colourless carotenoids. The halotolerant marine microalga Dunaliella salina is one of the richest sources of natural carotenoids (up to 10% dry weight), the majority of which is β-carotene [15]. Under certain conditions, however, D. salina is able to produce significant amounts of phytoene. The over-production of phytoene has been achieved successfully in different algal species using the plastoquinone mimics norflurazon and fluridone, as well as the carboxamide diflufenican [16,17,18,19]. With the treatment of norflurazon, for example, D. salina accumulated up to 8% (w/w) of phytoene instead of β-carotene [17,20].
Although phytoene desaturase inhibitors used to be considered environmentally safe because they are used at very low concentrations and target an enzyme not found in animals [21], there have been increasing safety concerns: for example, norflurazon is difficult to mineralize or degrade and is a long-lasting contaminant in the environment [22,23].
Phytoene-accumulating D. salina has also been obtained by suppression of the PDS gene [24] and by deleting PDS genes or overexpressing the phytoene synthase genes, as has been reported in a bacteria strain Deinococcus radiodurans [25]. Over-expression of a phytoene synthase gene into the green microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii results in over 2-fold increase of different carotenoids in the cells [26]. Taken together, these approaches focus on strategies that either up-regulate the upstream steps before phytoene synthesis or down-regulate the downstream steps after phytoene synthesis.
We have previously shown that a mitosis inhibitor, chlorpropham, which is widely used as a potato sprout inhibitor, will induce massive accumulation of phytoene in D. salina. Chlorpropham appears to disrupt the synchronised control between nuclear and chloroplast events in D. salina, which affects the recruitment of carotenogenic enzymes into biologically active, membrane-located metabolons [14]. The results suggest a new method with low toxicity for the production of colourless carotenoids by D. salina. We also demonstrated that red light promotes the production of carotenoids in D. salina, compared to white or blue light [12,14].
In the present study, apart from the commonly-known phytoene desaturase inhibitors and the proven mitosis inhibitor chlorpropham, 15 herbicides with different modes of action on functions in the metabolic pathway (either up-stream or down-stream of phytoene) were tested and the effects of red-light illumination on productivity were investigated.
The 15 herbicides were divided into six groups according to their modes of actions (Table 1). (i) Norflurazon, flurtamone and diflufenican are widely known PDS inhibitors known to induce phytoene accumulation. (ii) Amitrole, clomazone and cinmethylin are pigment inhibitors that are known to affect the synthesis of carotenoids but not function directly on PDS. Amitrole is a lycopene cyclase inhibitor that blocks the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene or α-carotene, but it has also been reported to inhibit the desaturation of ζ-carotene desaturase and cause the accumulation of ζ-carotene [19]. Clomazone inhibits deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase and thus prevents the biosynthesis of isoprenoid needed to synthesize carotenoids. Cinmethylin inhibits 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase and leads to the blockage of the synthesis of plastoquinone, which is required by PDS in phytoene desaturation. (iii) Three cell division inhibitors, namely, propyzamide, dimethenamid and chlorpropham were tested since, as we previously demonstrated, the cell division inhibitor chlorpropham induced a massive accumulation of phytoene [14]. Propyzamide inhibits the polymerization of microtubules, while chlorpropham inhibits the organization of microtubules. Dimethenamid inhibits the synthesis of very long chain fatty acids. (iv) Auxins have been reported to regulate carotenoid biosynthesis in plants and algae [27,28]. In this study, aminopyralid is a synthetic auxin herbicide and binds at receptor sites that are used by natural growth hormones, which leads to the disruption of normal growth. Diflufenzopyr-sodium is an auxin transport inhibitor that affects the process of plant growth. (v) Metabolic inhibitors chlorsulfuron and glyphosate are two widely used amino acid synthesis inhibitors. They can cause a disruption of cellular homeostasis that enhances the generation of reactive oxygen species, which, in turn, affects carotenoid biosynthesis. Glyphosate has been previously shown to increase the lutein content in D. salina by more than 2-fold with a decrease in the β-carotene content [29]. (vi) Lastly, aminoethyl sulfate, a GABA transaminase inhibitor, and cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide (CHDC), a germination inhibitor, both significantly affect cell development (which may further affect carotenoid biosynthesis) and were tested in this study.

2. Results

2.1. Phytoene Production with Combined Treatment of Different Inhibitors and Red Light

2.1.1. Phytoene Desaturase Inhibitors

Three phytoene desaturase inhibitors (norflurazon, flurtamone and diflufenican) were used to treat D. salina cultures under either white LED light or red LED light, as is shown in Figure 2. After 48 h, the cellular content of phytoene and phytoene yield increased significantly for each treatment compared to control cultures maintained under white light without inhibitor treatment. The cellular content of phytoene was less than 1 pg cell−1 in control cultures but above 6 pg cell−1 in treated cultures under white light. The cellular content of total carotenoids in the treated cultures also increased compared to control cultures but was less significant than for the difference in phytoene content, as the increase in phytoene was accompanied by a decrease in the coloured carotenoids.
Under red light, significantly higher amounts of cellular phytoene content and total phytoene were produced than under white light for all three PDS inhibitors. Under white light, the levels of phytoene were similar for each inhibitor, but under red light, treatment with norflurazon gave a higher cellular content of phytoene (14.42 ± 0.95 pg cell−1) and phytoene yield (7.79 ± 0.58 mg L−1) than flurtamone or diflufenican.

2.1.2. Pigment Inhibitors Other Than PDS Inhibitors

As shown in Figure 2, cultures treated by 50 µM amitrole or 20 µM clomazone did not show any increase in phytoene production, while the cellular content of phytoene in cinmethylin-treated cultures increased by ~2-fold compared to untreated cultures. However, the phytoene yield did not increase because cinmethylin also caused a significant reduction in cell growth. Red light increased phytoene production slightly in amitrole- or clomazone-treated cultures, while in cinmethylin-treated cultures, cellular phytoene content was lower under red light. Interestingly, red light cultivation supported a higher cell density than white light. Nevertheless, changes in phytoene as a result of treatment with these herbicides were marginal compared to changes caused by PDS inhibitors.

2.1.3. Cell Division Inhibitors

All three herbicides were added to cultures to a final concentration of 20 µM. As shown in Figure 2, propyzamide and chlorpropham massively increased (≥10-fold) both the cellular content of phytoene and phytoene yield in the cultures and the increases were further enhanced by red light illumination. Both propyzamide and chlorpropham demonstrated even higher phytoene production capacities than the three PDS inhibitors. At the same time, total carotenoids also showed a more significant increase than the PDS treated cultures. On the other hand, dimethenamid increased the cellular content of phytoene by ~2-fold, but the phytoene yield decreased because of the loss of cell number. Red light did not improve either phytoene or total carotenoids in dimethenamid treated cultures.

2.1.4. Growth Regulators

As shown in Figure 2, treatments with neither aminopyralid nor diflufenzopyr-sodium gave a significant increase in phytoene production or total carotenoids production.

2.1.5. Amino Acid Synthesis Inhibitors

Treatments with 100 µM chlorsulfuron or 50 µM glyphosate caused a marginal increase in the cellular content of phytoene, total carotenoids and total chlorophylls marginally compared to PDS inhibitors (<1.5-fold increase). The phytoene content and total yield also increased slightly under red light illumination compared to white light.

2.1.6. Other Inhibitors

Treatment of 100 µM aminoethyl sulfate increased both the cellular content of phytoene and the phytoene yield in cultures under either white light or red light. Treatment by 10 µM cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide (CHDC), a germination inhibitor, increased cellular phytoene content (~1.5-fold) in D. salina cultures maintained under white light; however, no increase was shown in cultures under red light.

2.2. Cellular Composition of Carotenoids in Cultures Maintained under White or Red Light with Selected Heribicides

Figure 3 shows HPLC chromatograms of carotenoid extracts from D. salina biomass treated with the five herbicides that significantly increased phytoene production (norflurazon, flurtamone, diflufenican, propyzamide and chlorpropham). The major carotenoids in the D. salina cultures, namely, phytoene, lutein, zeaxanthin, α-carotene and β-carotene, were quantified and their relative abundance was determined. As shown in Figure 3a, herbicide-treated cultures gave identical peaks corresponding to phytoene (peak 1) than in the control cultures. However, different levels corresponding to the coloured carotenoids were evident (Figure 3b). When compared to the control cultures, the three PDS inhibitors (norflurazon, flurtamone and diflufenican) showed a significant decrease in levels of the major coloured carotenoids, i.e., lutein (peak 2), zeaxanthin (peak 3), α-carotene (peak 4) and β-carotene isomers (peak 5 and peak 6), while propyzamide and chlorpropham did not show obvious changes in the content of coloured carotenoids.
The percentage of each carotenoid in total carotenoids was calculated for all the cultures treated with each of the 15 different herbicides and maintained either under white light or red light for 48 h. As shown in Figure 4, in control cultures without herbicide treatment, β-carotene (all-trans and 9-cis) was the major component and accounted for more than 80% of the total carotenoids, while the colourless phytoene amounted to less than 5% of the total carotenoids. Treatment with either norflurazon, flurtamone, diflufenican, propyzamide and chlorpropham increased the relative abundance of phytoene to above 30% under white light and above 40% under red light. Although some of the other herbicides, for example, cinmethylin and dimethenamid, also increased the phytoene composition, the increase was small.

3. Discussion

This study tested 15 different herbicides for phytoene production from D. salina, including three PDS inhibitors and a mitosis inhibitor chlorpropham already proven to induce massive accumulation of phytoene [14]. As expected, the three PDS inhibitors significantly increased (>10-fold) the cellular content of phytoene and reduced coloured carotenoids in D. salina culture.
In addition to the well documented PDS inhibitors, the two cell division inhibitors, propyzamide and chlorpropham, which disrupt mitosis by inhibiting either microtubule polymerization or organization, also induced a massive accumulation of phytoene (>10-fold). The difference between the PDS inhibitors and these two cell division inhibitors is that the accumulation of phytoene induced by the PDS inhibitors was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the cellular content of other carotenoids, particularly β-carotene, in contrast to propyzamide and chlorpropham, which did not significantly change the cellular content of the coloured carotenoids. PDS inhibitors also block the formation of the colourless carotenoid phytofluene, which absorbs UV-A light, while propyzamide and chlorpropham led to the increase of phytofluene content. In our previous study, chlorpropham was shown to massively increase the phytoene and phytofluene content as well as the chlorophyll content [14]; the effect was not due to a direct binding inhibition of PDS or a stress response such as nutrient starvation but due to a breakdown in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway that involves the division of the cell nucleus [14].
Both propyzamide and chlorpropham are widely used cell division herbicides. They have common properties in terms of function directed at microtubule spindle formation, which is needed for cell division. Both resulted in a similar over-production of phytoene in D. salina. Propyzamide belongs to the group of pronamide herbicides, which bind to tubulin and prevent the in vitro assembly of microtubules, causing the absence of microtubules in cells, while chlorpropham belongs to the group of carbamate herbicides, which disrupt the spindle microtubule organizing centres but usually do not cause the absence microtubules [30]. Another cell division inhibitor tested in this study, dimethenamid, which inhibits the synthesis of long chain fatty acids, did not show the same effect as propyzamide and chlorpropham. The results suggest that herbicides that have the same function as microtubule inhibitors have the potential to be used for the over-production of phytoene. Examples of other herbicides that inhibit polymerization of microtubules include benzamide, benzoic acid, dinitroaniline, phosphoramidate and pyridine herbicides (WSSA Group 3); examples of other herbicides that inhibit organization of microtubules include carbetamide and propham (WSSA Group 23).
This study also showed that inhibitors with different targets for activity can be applied to manipulate the composition of individual carotenoid in D. salina cells. Since all tested herbicides altered the cellular carotenoids’ composition to a greater or lesser extent, appropriate selection will be significant in relation to downstream processing for any given relative composition of carotenoids. In another study, diphenylamine (DPA), an inhibitor of β-carotene C-4 oxygenase, and glufosinate ammonium, a glutamine synthase inhibitor in the nitrogen metabolic pathway, increased the composition of β-carotene in D. bardawil, while glyphosate and DCMU significantly increased the composition of lutein [29]. Phytoene desaturase inhibitors bind to the same binding site as the plastoquinone, which acts as a cofactor for the function of phytoene desaturase [13]. Consequently, inhibitors, such as cinmethylin, that suppress the synthesis of plastoquinone would indirectly inhibit the activity of phytoene desaturase and are likely to induce the accumulation of phytoene with a decrease in other carotenoids. Moreover, since the activity of phytoene desaturase is controlled by the redox state of the plastidic plastoquinone pool [31], inhibitors that affect the redox state of the plastidic plastoquinone pool—that is, those affecting the activity of the photosynthetic electron transport in chloroplasts—are likely to regulate carotenoid synthesis, such as DBMIB.
The present study has shown, furthermore, that red light leads to further increases in the production of phytoene with herbicide-treated cultures of D. salina, which is in line with our previous study [12]. The enhancement is most significant when phytoene production is significantly increased by the three PDS inhibitors and the two microtubular inhibitors propyzamide and chlorpropham. Red light triggers the activity of phytoene synthase and hence enhances the production of carotenoids with the up-regulation of phytochrome-mediated synthesis of PSY transcripts [32]. Moreover, it has been shown that photoactivated phytochrome, when receiving light (preferably red light), leads to the degradation of PIF1 (phytochrome-interacting factor 1 that binds to the PSY promoter and represses PSY expression) [33], which indicates that red light would up-regulate PSY expression and increase carotenoids production. A combined use of appropriate herbicide treatment with red light illumination therefore offers an efficient way for the mass production of phytoene from D. salina.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Herbicides

A total of 15 herbicides were tested in this study. Norflurazon, diflufenican, flurtamone, amitrole, clomazone, cinmethylin, propyzamide, dimethenamid, chlorpropham, aminopyralid, diflufenzopyr-sodium, chlorsulfuron, glyphosate, aminoethyl sulfate, and cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). Each herbicide was dissolved either in water or ethanol, based on its solubility, to make a stock solution of 1 m and then diluted to different working concentrations of 5–500 µM for each herbicide in the D. salina cultures. Optimised working concentrations with maximal phytoene production for each herbicide were screened and used for the treatment of algal cultures.
According to their modes of action, the herbicides tested are classified into six different groups: (i) phytoene desaturase inhibitors, (ii) other pigment inhibitors (rather than phytoene desaturase inhibitors), (iii) cell division inhibitors, (iv) growth regulators, (v) amino acid synthesis inhibitors and (vi) other inhibitors. The name, CAS number, site of action and the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) group of each herbicide are listed in Table 1.

4.2. Algal Strain and Cultivation

D. salina strain CCAP 19/41 (PLY DF15) was obtained from the Marine Biological Association, UK (MBA). Algae were cultured in a Modified Johnsons Medium, as described by previous work [12]. D. salina cultures were grown to mid-log phase to a cell density of 0.2–0.5 million cells/mL and then different inhibitors were added. Treated cultures were maintained in an ALGEM environmental modelling labscale photobioreactor (Algenuity, Bedford, UK) at 25 °C. Cultures were treated with inhibitors for 48 h and illuminated with either white or red led light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1. The cell density of cultures was determined by counting the cell number of cultures using a haemocytometer after fixing the cells with 2% formalin. Biomass was collected regularly and analysed to determine the composition of cellular content of phytoene and other carotenoids.

4.3. Pigment Analysis

Phytoene and other carotenoids were analysed in cell extracts using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode-Array Detection (HPLC-DAD), as described in previous work [12]. Commercial standards of individual carotenoids, including all-trans β-carotene, all-trans α-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin and phytoene were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, UK. Standards were dissolved in methanol or acetone to make a solution of 1 mg/mL and dissolved to a series of working solutions (5, 10, 25 and 50 µg/mL) to generate standard curves. To detect various pigments in the extracts, the DAD scanned wavelengths of 280 nm (colourless phytoene), 355 nm (colourless phytofluene), 450 nm (all coloured carotenoids including β-carotene, α-carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin) and 663 nm (chlorophylls). Total chlorophylls and coloured carotenoids were evaluated by extracting pigments from the harvested algal biomass of a 1 mL culture using 1 mL of 80% (v/v) acetone and absorbance was measured at 664, 647 and 480 nm, according to previous work [12].

4.4. Data Analysis

All cultures with each treatment were set up in triplicates and biomass analysis was carried out at least in triplicate (n ≥ 3). The collected data were calculated and analysed in R by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), compared to control cultures with no inhibitors. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

Fifteen herbicides that are known to modify carotenoid biosynthesis, but with different modes of action, were assessed for effects on the over-production of the colourless carotenoid phytoene in D. salina. Propyzamide and chlorpropham, two mitosis inhibitors that inhibit microtubule polymerization or organization, have the same capability to over-produce phytoene in D. salina as the phytoene desaturase inhibitors. It is most likely that mitosis inhibitors disrupt the synchronised control between cell nuclear and chloroplast events and the recruitment of carotenogenic enzymes into biologically active, membrane-located metabolons. Their use offers a novel method with low toxicity for the over-production of colourless phytoene. Furthermore, the use of herbicide treatments in combination with red light illumination further increased phytoene production, compared to white light illumination. Phytoene accumulation caused by mitosis inhibitors warrants further development.

6. Patents

This work is patented under WO/2019/097219 Production of Dunaliella [34].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, Y.X.; Supervision, writing—reviewing and editing, project administration, funding acquisition, P.J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Interreg 2 Seas programme 2014–2020 co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund under subsidy contract No ValgOrize 2S05017 and from the EU KBBE.2013.3.2-02 programme (D-Factory: 368 613870).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stinco, C.M. The colourless carotenoids phytoene and phytofluene: From dietary sources to their usefulness for the functional foods and nutricosmetics industries. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 67, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, J.; Sun, Z.; Sun, P.; Chen, T.; Chen, F. Microalgal carotenoids: Beneficial effects and potential in human health. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gong, M.; Bassi, A. Carotenoids from microalgae: A review of recent developments. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1396–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Soudant, E.; Ben-Amotz, A. A carotenoid algal preparation containing phytoene and phytofluene inhibited LDL oxidation in vitro. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2008, 63, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benítez-González, A.; Stinco, C.M. A comprehensive review on the colorless carotenoids phytoene and phytofluene. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 572, 188–200. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mapelli-Brahm, P.; Corte-Real, J.; Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Bohn, T. Bioaccessibility of phytoene and phytofluene is superior to other carotenoids from selected fruit and vegetable juices. Food Chem. 2017, 229, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Welsch, R.; Wust, F.; Bar, C.; Al-Babili, S.; Beyer, P. A third phytoene synthase is devoted to abiotic stress-induced abscisic acid formation in rice and defines functional diversification of phytoene synthase genes. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Eonseon, J.; Lee, C.-G.; Polle, J.E.W. Secondary carotenoid accumulation in Haematococcus (Chlorophyceae): Biosynthesis, regulation, and biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 16, 821–831. [Google Scholar]
  9. Giuliano, G.; Giliberto, L.; Rosati, C. Carotenoid isomerase: A tale of light and isomers. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in algae: Distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1101–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koschmieder, J.; Fehling-Kaschek, M.; Schaub, P.; Brausemann, A.; Timmer, J. Plant-type phytoene desaturase: Functional evaluation of structural implications. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Xu, Y.; Harvey, P.J. Carotenoid production by Dunaliella salina under red light. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Breitenbach, J.; Zhu, C.; Sandmann, G. Bleaching herbicide norflurazon inhibits phytoene desaturase by competition with the cofactors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5270–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, Y.; Harvey, P. Phytoene and phytofluene overproduction by Dunaliella salina using the mitosis inhibitor chlorpropham. Algal Res. 2020, 52, 102126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lamers, P.P.; Janssen, M.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Bino, R.J.; Wijffels, R.H. Exploring and exploiting carotenoid accumulation in Dunaliella salina for cell-factory applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Laje, K.; Seger, M.; Dungan, B.; Cooke, P.; Polle, J.; Holguin, F.O. Phytoene accumulation in the novel microalga Chlorococcum sp. using the pigment synthesis inhibitor fluridone. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. León, R.; Vila, M.; Hernánz, D.; Vilchez, C. Production of phytoene by herbicide-treated microalgae Dunaliella bardawil in two-phase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 92, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ben-Amotz, A.; Gressel, J.; Avron, M. Massive accumulation of phytoene induced by norflurazon in Dunaliella bardawil (chlorophyceae) prevents recovery from photoinhibition. J. Phycol. 1987, 23, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harker, M.; Young, A.J. Inhibition of astaxanthin synthesis in the green alga, Haematococcus pluvialis. Eur. J. Phycol. 1995, 30, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ben-Amotz, A.; Lers, A.; Avron, M. Stereoisomers of β-carotene and phytoene in the alga Dunaliella bardawil. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Duke, S.O. Herbicides, Carotenoid Biosynthesis Inhibitors; American Cancer Society: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  22. Morillo, E.; Undabeytia, T.; Cabrera, A.; Villaverde, J.; Maqueda, C. Effect of soil type on adsorption-desorption, mobility, and activity of the herbicide norflurazon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sathishkumar, P.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Rozas, O.; Vergara, C.; Mansilla, H.D.; Gracia-Pinilla, M.A.; Anandan, S. Sonophotocatalytic mineralization of Norflurazon in aqueous environment. Chemosphere 2016, 146, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Babu, S.; Gothandam, K.M. Accumulation of phytoene, a colorless carotenoid by inhibition of phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene in Dunaliella salina V-101. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 242, 311–318. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jeong, S.-W.; Kang, C.K.; Choi, Y.J. Metabolic Engineering of Deinococcus radiodurans for the production of phytoene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 1691–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cordero, B.F.; Couso, I.; Rodríguez, H.; Vargas, M.Á. Enhancement of carotenoids biosynthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by nuclear transformation using a phytoene synthase gene isolated from Chlorella zofingiensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Alsenani, F.; Wass, T.J.; Ma, R.; Eltanahy, E.; Netzel, M.E.; Schenk, P.M. Transcriptome-wide analysis of Chlorella reveals auxin-induced carotenogenesis pathway in green microalgae. Algal Res. 2019, 37, 320–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cruz, A.B.; Bianchetti, R.E.; Alves, F.R.R.; Purgatto, E.; Peres, L.E.P.; Rossi, M.; Freschi, L. Light, ethylene and auxin signaling interaction regulates carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Doddaiah, K.M.; Narayan, A.; Aswathanarayana, R.G.; Ravi, S. Effect of metabolic inhibitors on growth and carotenoid production in Dunaliella bardawil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 50, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Vaughn, K.C.; Lehnen, L.P. Mitotic disrupter herbicides. Weed Sci. 1991, 39, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Brausemann, A.; Gemmecker, S.; Koschmieder, J.; Einsle, O. Structure of phytoene desaturase provides insights into herbicide binding and reaction mechanisms involved in carotene desaturation. Structure 2017, 25, 1222–1232.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Welsch, R.; Beyer, P.; Hugueney, P.; Kleinig, H.; vom Lintig, J. Regulation and activation of phytoene synthase, a key enzyme in carotenoid biosynthesis, during photomorphogenesis. Planta 2000, 211, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Toledo-Ortiz, G.; Huq, E. Direct regulation of phytoene synthase gene expression and carotenoid biosynthesis by phytochrome-interacting factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11626–11631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Harvey, P.J.; Xu, Y. Production of Dunaliella. WO/2019/097219, 23 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g001 550
Figure 1. Carotenoid biosynthetic pathway showing key enzymes involved and specific sites of action by inhibitors.
Figure 1. Carotenoid biosynthetic pathway showing key enzymes involved and specific sites of action by inhibitors.
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g001
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g002a 550Marinedrugs 19 00595 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a) Cellular content of phytoene, (b) phytoene yield, (c) cellular content of total carotenoids (sum of colourless and coloured carotenoids) and (d) cellular content of coloured carotenoids in D. salina cultures treated with different groups of herbicides: (i) phytoene desaturase inhibitors norflurazon, flurtamone and diflufenican at a working concentration of 5 µM; (ii) other pigment inhibitors of 50 µM amitrole, 20 µM clomazone and 20 µM cinmethylin; (iii) cell division inhibitors propyzamide, dimethenamid, chlorpropham at a working concentration of 20 µM; (iv) growth regulator inhibitors 250 µM aminopyralid or 20 µM diflufenzopyr-sodium; (v) amino acid synthesis inhibitors 100 µM chlorsulfuron or 50 µM glyphosate; (vi) 100 µM aminoethyl sulfate and 10 µM cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide (CHDC). Optimal concentrations of each herbicide were pre-determined and concentrations with the highest phytoene yield were used. All cultures were illuminated either under white or red led light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 48 h after adding herbicides. Results were analysed by one-way ANOVA in R with posterior Dunnett’s tests and compared to the control group. Asterisks represent different levels of significance (*** 0 < p ≤ 0.001, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. (a) Cellular content of phytoene, (b) phytoene yield, (c) cellular content of total carotenoids (sum of colourless and coloured carotenoids) and (d) cellular content of coloured carotenoids in D. salina cultures treated with different groups of herbicides: (i) phytoene desaturase inhibitors norflurazon, flurtamone and diflufenican at a working concentration of 5 µM; (ii) other pigment inhibitors of 50 µM amitrole, 20 µM clomazone and 20 µM cinmethylin; (iii) cell division inhibitors propyzamide, dimethenamid, chlorpropham at a working concentration of 20 µM; (iv) growth regulator inhibitors 250 µM aminopyralid or 20 µM diflufenzopyr-sodium; (v) amino acid synthesis inhibitors 100 µM chlorsulfuron or 50 µM glyphosate; (vi) 100 µM aminoethyl sulfate and 10 µM cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide (CHDC). Optimal concentrations of each herbicide were pre-determined and concentrations with the highest phytoene yield were used. All cultures were illuminated either under white or red led light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 48 h after adding herbicides. Results were analysed by one-way ANOVA in R with posterior Dunnett’s tests and compared to the control group. Asterisks represent different levels of significance (*** 0 < p ≤ 0.001, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g002aMarinedrugs 19 00595 g002b
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g003 550
Figure 3. HPLC chromatograms of the carotenoids extracts from D. salina biomass grown under white light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 and treated with herbicides that significantly increased phytoene production for 48 h. (a) Absorption at 280 nm detecting phytoene; (b) absorption at 450 nm detecting coloured carotenoids. Peaks: 1. phytoene, 2. lutein, 3. zeaxanthin, 4. α-carotene, 5. all-trans β-carotene, 6. 9-cis β-carotene.
Figure 3. HPLC chromatograms of the carotenoids extracts from D. salina biomass grown under white light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 and treated with herbicides that significantly increased phytoene production for 48 h. (a) Absorption at 280 nm detecting phytoene; (b) absorption at 450 nm detecting coloured carotenoids. Peaks: 1. phytoene, 2. lutein, 3. zeaxanthin, 4. α-carotene, 5. all-trans β-carotene, 6. 9-cis β-carotene.
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g003
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative carotenoids contents (% in total carotenoids) in D. salina cultures treated by different herbicides under white or red led light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 48 h. Cultures of each condition were set up at least in triplets. Data are calculated by means of biological replicates (n ≥ 3).
Figure 4. Relative carotenoids contents (% in total carotenoids) in D. salina cultures treated by different herbicides under white or red led light at 200 µmol m−2 s−1 for 48 h. Cultures of each condition were set up at least in triplets. Data are calculated by means of biological replicates (n ≥ 3).
Marinedrugs 19 00595 g004
Table
Table 1. A list of 15 herbicides tested in the study grouped by their modes of action according to the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA).
Table 1. A list of 15 herbicides tested in the study grouped by their modes of action according to the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA).
HerbicideHerbicide Active Ingredient (IUPAC Name; CAS Number)Site of ActionWSSA Group
(i) Phytoene desaturase inhibitors
Norflurazon4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyridazin-3-one; 27314-13-2Phytoene desaturase (PDS) inhibitor12
DiflufenicanN-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-2-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]pyridine-3-carboxamide; 83164-33-412
Flurtamone5-(methylamino)-2-phenyl-4-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]furan-3-one; 96525-23-412
(ii) Other pigment inhibitors
Amitrole1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amine; 61-82-5Lycopene cyclase inhibitor, ζ-carotene desaturase inhibitor11
Clomazone2-(2-chlorobenzyl)-4,4-dimethyl-1,2-oxazolidin-3-one; 81777-89-1DOXP (1-deoxy-d-xyulose 5-phosphate synthase) inhibitor13
Cinmethylin1-methyl-2-[(2-methylphenyl)methoxy]-4-propan-2-yl-7-oxabicyclo[2,2.1]heptane; 87818-31-3HPPD (4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase) inhibitor (blockage of plastoquinone synthesis)27
(iii) Cell division inhibitors
Propyzamide3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethylprop-2-ynyl) benzamide; 23950-58-5Microtubule polymerization inhibitor 3
Dimethenamid2-Chloro-N-(2,4-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide; 87674-68-8Long-chain fatty acid inhibitor15
Chlorprophampropan-2-yl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate; 101-21-3Microtubule organisation inhibitor23
(iv) Growth regulators
Aminopyralid4-amino-3,6-dichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid; 150114-71-9Synthetic auxins4
Diflufenzopyr-sodiumsodium;2-[(E)-N-[(3,5-difluorophenyl)carbamoylamino]-C-methylcarbonimidoyl]pyridine-3-carboxylate; 109293-98-3Auxin transport inhibitor19
(v) Amino acid synthesis inhibitors
Chlorsulfuron1-(2-chlorophenyl)sulfonyl-3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)urea; 64902-72-3ALS (acetolactate synthase) inhibitors 2
Glyphosate2-(phosphonomethylamino)acetic acid; 1071-83-6 sulfosate (glyphosate-trimesium) 2-(phosphonomethylamino)acetate;trimethylsulfanium; 81591-81-3EPSP (5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate3-phosphate) synthase inhibitor9
(vi) Other inhibitors
Aminoethyl Sulfate2-Aminoethyl hydrogen sulfate; 926-39-6GABA transaminase inhibitor (increased GABA levels)-
cis-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydrophthalimide(3aR,7aS)-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydroisoindole-1,3-dione, 1469-48-3Germination inhibitor-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Y.; Harvey, P.J. Mitosis Inhibitors Induce Massive Accumulation of Phytoene in the Microalga Dunaliella salina. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110595

AMA Style

Xu Y, Harvey PJ. Mitosis Inhibitors Induce Massive Accumulation of Phytoene in the Microalga Dunaliella salina. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(11):595. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Yanan, and Patricia J. Harvey. 2021. "Mitosis Inhibitors Induce Massive Accumulation of Phytoene in the Microalga Dunaliella salina" Marine Drugs 19, no. 11: 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110595

APA Style

Xu, Y., & Harvey, P. J. (2021). Mitosis Inhibitors Induce Massive Accumulation of Phytoene in the Microalga Dunaliella salina. Marine Drugs, 19(11), 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop