Next Article in Journal
Structure and Metabolically Oriented Efficacy of Fucoidan from Brown Alga Sargassum muticum in the Model of Colony Formation of Melanoma and Breast Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Production of Bioactive Peptides from Hake By-Catches: Optimization and Scale-Up of Enzymatic Hydrolysis Process
Previous Article in Journal
Dictyota and Canistrocarpus Brazilian Brown Algae and Their Bioactive Diterpenes—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Deployment and Harvest Date on Growth and High-Value Compounds of Farmed Alaria esculenta
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Trash to Treasure: An Up-to-Date Understanding of the Valorization of Seafood By-Products, Targeting the Major Bioactive Compounds

1
Institute of Food Science, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro Namgu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Fisheries Technology, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
3
Department of Food Science and Technology, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro Namgu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(9), 485; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090485
Submission received: 16 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 9 September 2023

Abstract

:
Fishery production is exponentially growing, and its by-products negatively impact industries’ economic and environmental status. The large amount of bioactive micro- and macromolecules in fishery by-products, including lipids, proteins, peptides, amino acids, vitamins, carotenoids, enzymes, collagen, gelatin, chitin, chitosan, and fucoidan, need to be utilized through effective strategies and proper management. Due to the bioactive and healthy compounds in fishery discards, these components can be used as functional food ingredients. Fishery discards have inorganic or organic value to add to or implement in various sectors (such as the agriculture, medical, and pharmaceutical industries). However, the best use of these postharvest raw materials for human welfare remains unelucidated in the scientific community. This review article describes the most useful techniques and methods, such as obtaining proteins and peptides, fatty acids, enzymes, minerals, and carotenoids, as well as collagen, gelatin, and polysaccharides such as chitin–chitosan and fucoidan, to ensure the best use of fishery discards. Marine-derived bioactive compounds have biological activities, such as antioxidant, anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities. These high-value compounds are used in various industrial sectors, such as the food and cosmetic industries, owing to their unique functional and characteristic structures. This study aimed to determine the gap between misused fishery discards and their effects on the environment and create awareness for the complete valorization of fishery discards, targeting a sustainable world.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Presently, a rapidly growing population demands quality food and ingredients as part of their regular consumption preferences. Fish is considered the most accessible source of protein, and protein-based food ingredient materials are cheaper than other sources. In the fishery sector, the amount of fish and fish-related products (crustaceans, fish, mollusks, and others) has increased, reaching 177.8 million tons (MT) in 2020; this includes 157.4 MT directly used for human food and 20.2 MT utilized in nonfood applications [1]. Globally, the annual discarded fish waste was estimated at 9.1 MT, comprising 10.8% of the annual average catches in 2010–2014 [2]. In 2018, fish production was estimated to reach 179 MT, producing nearly 20–23 MT of fishery by-products. Following that, the rapidly expanding aquaculture industry contributed approximately 52% of the fish people consumed [3].
Fishing activities in the ocean generate many by-products with economic and environmental impacts [3]. However, the knowledge of the effective valorization of these by-products can help in sustainable management, thus reducing the negative impact. In addition to fishery by-product generation during harvests in marine and coastal waters, a considerable amount is generated from the fish-processing industries and domestic markets. These by-products typically comprise the skin, scales, bone, fins, visceral parts, heads, and shells of various crustaceans [4], which are considered excellent sources of different bioactive compounds [4,5,6,7] (Figure 1).
Various studies have shown the use of fishery by-products as feeds in the poultry and cattle industries [8,9]. Such low-cost applications hinder maximum utilization; hence, combined information on these discards’ availability and potentiality can help create a strategy. Moreover, by 2050, the world population is estimated to be approximately 9.2 billion, requiring effective strategies for a sustainable food supply and a reduction in pollution to protect the environment [10]. The effective utilization of large amounts of fishery by-products can significantly help the food, pharmaceutical, and other industries. Previous studies have proven these by-products to be treasures upon their utilization.
Regarding their nutritional values and functional properties, fishery by-products generally contain 15–30% protein, 0–25% crude lipids, 50–80% moisture, and different vitamins and minerals [3,6,11]. Crustacean by-products are a rich source of different macromolecules, including chitin, chitosan [12,13], polyunsaturated fatty acids, and various valuable carotenoids such as astaxanthin [14,15]. The health benefits of these compounds prompt scientists to think of better applications for these by-products (Figure 2).
Thus, this review aimed to summarize recent studies targeting the valorization of fishery by-products. Converting low-value seafood by-products to high-value bioactive compounds is an excellent economic and environmental approach. Reducing the loss of valuable compounds in the by-products can also bring additional benefits and help humanity achieve a sustainable world. Different food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries use bioactive compounds such as gelatin, collagen, carotenoids, and unsaturated fatty acids from fishery sources owing to their good acceptability worldwide. We believe that this review will provide up-to-date information on the valorization of seafood or marine by-products, targeted bioactive compounds, their extraction technologies, and their functional properties.

2. Fishery By-Products

According to the fishery dictionary of the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), “fishery by-products can be defined as the proportion of the total organic material of animal origin in the catch, which is thrown away or dumped at sea, for whatever reason. It does not include plant material and postharvest waste such as offal.” Also, it describes bycatch as “the part of a catch of a fishing unit taken incidentally in addition to the target species toward which fishing effort is directed. Some or all of it may be returned to the sea as discards, usually dead or dying” [16]. Table 1 shows the amount of by-products generated by major seafood items.

3. Fish By-Products as a Source of Various Bioactive Compounds

3.1. Concentrated Seafood Protein

Seafood-generated by-products such as fish heads, skin, bones, scales, fins, and blood contain a high amount of proteins and other bioactive compounds [3,6,11,24]. Generally, proteins in their original forms are tightly attached via different chemical forces, including hydrophobic effects, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, and disulfide bonds [25].
Methods for recovering protein from fishery by-products differ. The most common include fish protein hydrolysates, fish protein isolates, and the extraction of myofibrillar types of protein (surimi).

3.1.1. Fish Protein Hydrolysates

Several methods exist for obtaining protein hydrolysates from fishery by-products. The most common are chemical hydrolysis via acidic or alkaline mediums, bacterial fermentation, and enzymatic hydrolysis [26]. Although chemical hydrolysis has a low cost and rapidly extracts protein compared with enzymatic hydrolysis, many scientists prefer enzymatic hydrolysis due to its several advantages. Using enzymatic hydrolysis, approximately 15–30% of protein is obtainable from fishery by-products [11]. Several studies have reported little control over the consistency of the hydrolyzed products and the variations in the free amino acid profile for the nonspecific breakdown of peptide bonds [26,27]. To hydrolyze fish protein or to turn the protein from fish by-products into peptides or amino acids, combined cleaved proteins are called fish protein hydrolysates. A factor contributing to its interest is the use of industrially appropriate hydrolysis. Because they can recover large amounts of protein, research on them has recently increased [26,28]. Enzymatic protein hydrolysis, which uses endogenous enzymes to cleave peptide bonds in amino acids, has recently been considered an alternative to traditional chemical hydrolysis. The protein obtained from fishery discards using enzyme hydrolysis varies significantly depending on the sex, age, diet, and even season of different species [26]. Table 2 shows the proteins extracted from fishery by-products using different methods and extraction processes.

3.1.2. Fish Protein Isolates

Seafood protein can be isolated using the isoelectric solubilization method, commonly known as the pH-shifting method. This isoelectric precipitation method involves three steps. First, the protein from the marine by-products is solubilized at a higher pH value (primary condition). Then, the solubilized protein is turned to a neutral pH to disrupt the cellular membrane and separate unwanted molecules via centrifugation, and, finally, the isolated protein can precipitate at the isoelectric point [28]. Tang et al. [25] reported that protein extraction using the pH-shifting method showed better gelling, water-holding, emulsification, and oil-holding properties. The nutritional value of the extracted protein highly depends on the presence of essential amino acids [29]. Several studies have shown that protein obtained using the pH-shifting method resulted in a high amount of essential amino acids compared with other extraction methods [25,29,30].

3.1.3. Surimi

Myofibrillar types of protein obtained using the mechanical deboning and washing of the fish process (fish flesh) are referred to as surimi. While preparing surimi, except for the myofibrillar protein, all other compounds, such as sarcoplasmic protein, connective tissues, and crude lipids, are removed via repeated washing and dewatering processes. It is generally prepared from low-cost lean fish, bycatch species, and other marine by-products. Surimi is an excellent concentrated protein source and a popular intermediate raw material for preparing popular seafood products such as kamaboko, fish or crab analog, and sausage [3,31,32].
Table 2. Protein hydrolysates obtained from different fishery products, their extracting agents, and the functionalities of the obtained proteins.
Table 2. Protein hydrolysates obtained from different fishery products, their extracting agents, and the functionalities of the obtained proteins.
Fish SpeciesBy-ProductsExtraction Agents (Enzymes)Properties/ActivitiesReferences
Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)Frames and headsFicin, neutrase, protamex, papain, novo-proD, thermolysin, alcalase, and bromelainProtease reaction kinetics showed that ficin was the most efficient to hydrolyze catfish proteins, and the foaming and emulsifying properties of the protein hydrolysates were observed. [33]
Striped catfish (Pangasianodon Hypophthalmus)Viscera Enzymatic (pepsin and papain) and chemical process (e.g., NaOH, HCl)The spray-dried and enzymatically extracted hydrolysate had lower turbidity with increasing pH; the lowest solubility, foaming capacity, and stability were observed at pH 5.0.[34]
Small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula)By-products of muscleEnzymatic hydrolysis (protamex, esperase, and alcalase)Protein hydrolysates obtained via enzymatic hydrolysis showed strong antihypertensive and antioxidant properties.[35]
Bluefin leatherjacket (Navodon
Septentrionalis)
Heads Enzymatic hydrolysis (papain)Protein hydrolysates showed antioxidant properties.[36]
Sardinella (Sardinella aurita)Viscera and headsEnzymatic hydrolysis (microbial proteases)Protein hydrolysates showed antioxidant properties.[37]
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Fins, heads, backbone, and visceraEnzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase)Protein hydrolysates showed antioxidant properties.[38]
Red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.)VisceraEnzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase)Peptide fractionation was performed using ultrafiltration, and the <1 kDa fraction (FRTVH-V) expressed the highest iron-binding capacity.[39]
Anchovies (Engraulis encrasicolus)VisceraEnzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase, flavourzyme, and protamex)Protein hydrolysates showed activities in in vitro and in vivo model biological activities by decreasing the severity of oxidative stress.[40]
Bluefin leatherjacket (Navodon
Septentrionalis)
SkinsEnzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase, trypsin, papain, neutrase, pepsin, and flavourzyme) The antioxidant activities of peptides were evaluated with three radical scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibition assays.[41]
Australian rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii)ShellsEnzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase)The protein hydrolysate produced by this study had excellent functionality (solubility 91.7%, water absorption 32%, oil absorption 2.3 mL/g, foaming 51.3%, emulsification 91.3%) and high nutritional quality (34% essential amino acids, 45.4 mg/g arginine, lysine/arginine ratio 0.69) with potential applications for the food industry.[42]
Horse mackerel (Magalaspis cordyla) and croaker (Otolithes ruber)SkinsEnzymatic hydrolysis (trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and pepsin)Peptides presented in protein hydrolysates exhibited higher activity against polyunsaturated fatty acid peroxidation than the natural antioxidant α-tocopherol.[43]
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)Backbones and headsEnzymatic hydrolysis (protex 7 L, promod 671 L, and alcalase 2.4 L)Chemical, surface activity, and sensory properties were shown.[44]
Serra Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus Brasiliensis)Scales crushed and bonesEnzymatic hydrolysis (flavourzyme, and alcalase)Protein hydrolysate showed better technological performance by stabilizing emulsions and retaining oil, and they could be added to emulsified products, improving their technological and sensory aspects.[45]
Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo)Frames, heads, skin, trimming, and visceraEnzymatic hydrolysis (protamex)The protein hydrolysates presented some antioxidant activity, which increased with increasing degree of hydrolysis.[46]
AnchovyFish sauce by-product (FSB)Enzymatic hydrolysis (proteinase K)The low-molecular-weight FSB fraction contained potent antioxidative molecules, which were identified as PQLLLLLL and LLLLLLL.[47]
Atlantic holothurian (Cucumaria frondosa)Internal organs and aqua-pharyngeal bulbEnzymatic hydrolysis (proteases) Enzymatic hydrolysates extracted from by-products of the marine invertebrates were demonstrated as active against HSV-1 (Herpes Simplex virus 1).[48]
Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Head and boneIn-vitro gastrointestinal (GI) digestion methodProtein hydrolysates can be applied in health care products as antioxidant agents.[49,50]
Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis)Whole bodyEnzymatic hydrolysis (papain and alcalase 2.4 L) Hydrolysates can be used as natural antioxidant substitutes in pharmaceuticals and food products.[51]
Monkfish (Lophius piscatorius)By-products (head and viscera)Enzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase)Protein hydrolysates showed antioxidant and antihypertensive activities.[52]
SalmonVisceraEnzymatic hydrolysis (papain, alcalase, and autolysis process)The results showed that the obtained protein-rich hydrolysates from fish industries are a promising alternative for expensive nitrogen sources that are commonly used for fermenting yeasts.[53]
Australian rock lobsterHeadsChemical process and enzymatic hydrolysis (alcalase)The results of this study demonstrated the potential value of lobster protein hydrolysates used as a safe emulsifier with significant nutritional value for the food industry.[54]
Eel (Conger myriaster)SkinSubcritical water hydrolysisStrong antioxidant activities.[55]
Yellow corvina (Larimichthys polyactis)Head and visceraSubcritical water hydrolysisProtein hydrolysates showed excellent antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anticancer activity.[4]
Comb Penshell (Atrina pectinata)VisceraSubcritical water hydrolysisProtein hydrolysates showed good antioxidant and antihypertensive activity.[56]

3.2. Extraction and Biofunctionality of Peptides from Marine By-Products

Bioactive peptides, generally inactive protein fragments obtained by the action of enzymes, regulate the body’s receptor and physiological functions, including antihypertensive, antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, antiproliferative, immunomodulating, anticoagulant, and antiviral activities [3]. Peptides obtained from seafood by-products also showed angiotensin enzyme (ACE)-inhibition activity, calcium and opioid binding inhibition, and hemolytic properties [57]. Marine fishery discards have been found to be good sources of bioactive peptides [58]. Table 3 shows recent studies on peptide extraction. Fishery discards (usually skin, fin, and head) are rich sources of collagen and gelatin. Fish gelatins contain hydrophobic amino acids (hydroxyproline, valine, glycine, proline, and alanine) with a certain range of peptides with strong antioxidant activities [3,59]. Lassoued et al. [60] showed that the antioxidant activities of ray skin (thornback) were mainly due to the presence of hydrophobic amino acids.
There are different technologies for extracting bioactive peptides from marine biomass. The traditional methods are enzymatic [37,43,48,51] and fermentation hydrolysis [47]. Enzymatic hydrolysis is mostly preferred and effective due to its high specificity, and this methodology does not require any toxic chemicals. The main commercial enzymes for producing bioactive peptides are alcalase, flavorzyme, neutrase, pepsin, trypsin, and papain [36,37,43,49,50,51]. Subcritical water hydrolysis has attracted attention as a green extraction methodology for extracting peptides from marine biomass [55,56].
Purifying peptides from hydrolysates is costly and considered economically unprofitable. Therefore, there is limited research on the purification of peptides from protein hydrolysates. Several researchers have worked on crude protein hydrolysates from seafood discards without purifying peptides [10]. Although seafood peptides have high antioxidant properties, their application is limited in the food industry due to their fishy odors and taste, which is unacceptable to some consumers [61]. Therefore, a large scope exists to develop the taste of protein hydrolysates containing bioactive peptides.
There are various other peptides, along with antioxidant peptides, including antimicrobial and ACE-inhibitory peptides. Antimicrobial peptides are considered the building blocks of animal defense systems [3]. Fish-originated antimicrobial peptides are positively charged and contain a higher amount of hydrophobic amino acids than those obtained from terrestrial animals [62]. Antimicrobial peptides from snow crab and Atlantic crab by-products showed potent inhibitory activity against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria [63]. Researchers intend to develop modern antibiotics and food preservation agents from marine-derived antimicrobial peptides.
Due to their biofunctional abilities, peptides derived from marine sources are gaining popularity in different industries. It is assumed that synthetic drugs will be replaced by marine peptides with similar efficacy but lower or no adverse effects [64].
Table 3. Peptides from various fishery by-product derivatives, some examples of which are the studies below.
Table 3. Peptides from various fishery by-product derivatives, some examples of which are the studies below.
Fish SpeciesBody PartsExtraction (Hydrolysis) Agents (Enzymes)Properties/ActivitiesReferences
TilapiaSkin gelatinPepsin and pancreatinACE-inhibitory activity.[65]
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)SkinFlavourzyme, alcalase, and ultrafiltration methodAnticancer, antioxidant properties present in fractions and non-fraction peptides.[66]
Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus)Skin gelatinAlcalase, papain, trypsin, neutrase, and pepsinACE-inhibitory activity.[67]
Cod (Gadus morhua)Frames Trypsin, pepsin, and those chymotrypsin combinations Antioxidant properties.[68]
Atlantic rock crab (Cancer irroratus)By-productsProteolytic enzyme action on processingAntibacterial activity.[63]
Smooth hound (Mustelus mustelus)Viscera wastes Proteases (commercial), endogenous enzymes, and those combinations ACE-inhibitory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activity.[62]
Codfish blood and sardine Cooking-water wastesMembrane ultrafiltrationThe peptide fractions from codfish blood exhibited the highest ABTS+ and ORAC values. Peptide fractions from sardine wastewater were capable of inhibiting Escherichia coli growth.[69]
Threadfin breams (Nemipterus japonicus)FramesPlant proteases (bromelain and papain)Antioxidant properties (2,2 diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl [DPPH] radical scavenging activity, ferric-reducing power, and lipid peroxidation inhibition) of hydrolysates increased with an increase in the degree of hydrolysis.[70]
Shortfin scad (Decapterus Macrosoma)BonesAlcalaseObtained peptides showed angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory activity.[71]
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)By-productsPapain, protamex, trypsin, flavourzyme, and alcalaseAntioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activity. The results of this research suggested that the high-molecular-weight enzymatic hydrolysate derived from shrimp can be used to control oxidative stress and prevent hypertension.[72]
Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)Bone frames and headsProteasesThe emulsifying and foaming properties and stability of selected hydrolysates were evaluated.[33]
Skate (Raja porosa)CartilageChromatography and ultrafiltration The result suggested that the isolated peptides have excellent antioxidant properties.[73]
Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)SkinAlcalaseNovel peptides isolated from grass carp skin possess potent antioxidant activities and might be used for food preservation and medicinal purposes.[74]
Lizardfish (Synodus macrops)Scale gelatin Trypsin, papain, bromelain, chymotrypsin, and alcalaseACE-inhibitory peptides derived from scale gelatin have the potential to be used as healthy ACE-inhibiting drug raw materials.[75]
Pacific cod (G. macrocephalus)Skin gelatinPepsinExtracted peptides showed potent ACE inhibition with IC50 values of 6.9 and 14.5 μM.[67]
Anchovy (Engraulis japonicas)Cooking-water wastesProtamexPurified antimicrobial activity with no hemolytic activity up to a concentration of 512 μg/mL. [76]
Thornback ray (Raja clavata)Skin gelatinAlcalaseACE-inhibitory activity.[60]
Seabass (Lates calcarifer) Skin gelatinAlcalasePeptides prepared from seabass skin showed good antioxidant activity.[77]
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)Trimming Alcalase 2.4 L, flavourzyme 500 L, Corolase PP, and Promod 144 MGBioactive peptides displayed good DPP-IV and ACE inhibitory and antioxidant activity.[78]
Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis)RoeFlavourzymeFour peptides among the fifteen extracted peptides showed remarkable ACE-inhibitory activity.[79]
Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis)Whole bodyPapain and alcalase 2.4 LThe fractions and purified peptides can be used as natural antioxidant substitutes in pharmaceuticals and food products.[51]
Atlantic sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa)Whole bodyAlcalase and trypsinGenerated peptides inhibited MPO (a mediator and marker of in vivo oxidative stress) with predicted molecular interactions.[80]
Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba)By-productsTrypsinThe preparation process of Antarctic krill peptides-zinc chelate was optimized. Chelate showed excellent stability against various pH and gastrointestinal digestion.[81]
Squid (Dosidicus gigas)By-productsProtease XIV and ultrafiltration (UFI)Peptide fractions obtained after UFI had higher antioxidant and antimutagenic activities, but the antiproliferative activity did not improve after UFI.[82]
Bigeye tunaSkin Subcritical waterPeptides obtained via subcritical water hydrolysis showed high antioxidant and antimicrobial activity.[83]
Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis)SkinTrypsin, neutrase, papain, pepsin, and alcalaseThe antioxidant peptides extracted in this study can act as active ingredients in preventing UVA injury.[84]
Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis)MiltsTrypsin, neutrase, papain, pepsin, and alcalaseBioactive peptides displayed significant protection to HUVECs against H2O2 damage by increasing antioxidase levels.[85]
Sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus)SpermaryPapainExtracted peptides change the permeability of the microbial cell membranes and may exert antimicrobial activity by inhibiting the metabolic process of the nucleic acids.[86]
Siberian sturgeon (Acipenserbaerii)CartilageAlcalase, papain, trypsin, flavourzyme, and pepsinThe extracted peptides displayed significant cytoprotection on HUVECs against H2O2 injury.[87]
Sea intestine (Urechis unicinctus)VisceraPapain, trypsin, and alkaline proteaseExtracted peptides exhibited strong antioxidant activity.[88]

3.3. Fishery Discards as a Source of Lipids

Marine fishery discards are considered an excellent source of edible lipids due to the presence of health-beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Most edible oils are soluble in nonpolar solvents because of their nonpolar behavior [89]. Lipids include triglycerides, waxes, alcohols, cholesterol, phospholipids, and free fatty acids [90].
Fish oil is a significant source of PUFAs in the human diet [3]. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic fatty acid (DHA) are among the health-beneficial PUFAs available in fishery by-products, which are highly demanded in the market [23]. Several studies have reported that PUFAs are helpful for the brain development of infants during pregnancy, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in humans, maintaining blood pressure, and improving myocardial activity [3,6,11,90,91].
Several methods have been applied to extract lipids from fishery resources. Among them, traditional methods such as solvent extraction require high energy and organic solvents, negatively affecting the environment [23]. Hence, several green extraction methods have recently been applied to obtain high-quality oil from fishery discards. The most common green extraction methods are supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction [92], microwave-assisted hydrolysis, and enzymatic hydrolysis [89,92]. SC-CO2 is a promising technology for extracting high-quality lipids from fishery discards. This extraction method can easily regulate the extraction of specific fatty acids by controlling the extraction pressure and temperature. A significant advantage of this extraction method is that it does not require any further purification of the oil after extraction. Figure 3 shows a diagram of a typical SC-CO2 plant for extracting oils from fishery discards. Table 4 shows the extraction methods of edible oils from seafood discards and their yields, as well as PUFA content.
Seafood is an important source of various unsaturated fatty acids. Omega-3 is a unique unsaturated fatty acid that plays an essential role in the regulation of various biological functions in the human body [93]. DHA is a major structural component of human retinal photoreceptors and helps maintain a healthy visual system [94]. Several studies have shown that PUFAs are essential for developing brain and nerve cells along with the eyes of fetuses and infants [95,96]. Omega-3 fatty acids can also regulate gene expression, cell membrane composition, and eicosanoid production [97]. EPA acts as a precursor of eicosanoids and plays a vital role in hormonal activities. Unsaturated fatty acids can serve as suppressors of triacylglycerol and fatty acid synthesis, thus reducing the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases [94].
The health-beneficial activities of marine-driven PUFAs have high market value. Due to the high demand, PUFA-fortified products are widely available worldwide. Products fortified with fish, krill, and algal oils are popular due to their functionalities [98,99]. Given the oxidative vulnerability of PUFAs, different strategies are necessary to extend their shelf life. However, several antioxidative agents are being used to extend fish oil’s shelf life in the final products. However, several modern technologies, like PUFA microencapsulation by various carrier materials, can be applied, and this new stabilization technique is continuously progressing [100].
Table 4. Extraction of high-quality lipids from by-products of different seafood species.
Table 4. Extraction of high-quality lipids from by-products of different seafood species.
Fish SpeciesBody PartsExtraction MethodsYield of Oil/PUFA Content (%)References
Seabass (Dicentrarhus labrax), bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus), and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)Liver (bluefin tuna), gills and heads (seabass), guts (seabream) Raw materials were ground and cooked at 95 °C temperature for 12 min. Then, the materials were pressed with an expeller screw and separated oil, water, and dry matter via centrifugation (at 4200 rpm).Lipid content: 27 ± 3;
PUFA content of tuna by-product: 38 ± 7; tuna; liver: 35 ± 6; cod liver: 34 ± 0.3; sardine oil: 36 ± 3; seabass oil: 30 ± 0.2.
[101]
Rohu (Labeo rohita)HeadsEnzymatic treatment with protamex (1:100 w/w), with microwave (MW), ultrasound (US), and heat pretreatment (HT).Crude lipid obtained with MW: 60.45–69.75; US: 58.74–68.08; HT: 31.98–39.03.
PUFA content with MW: 37.51 ± 0.53, US: 39.28 ± 0.33, HT: 38.31 ± 0.17.
[102]
Yellowtail fish (Seriola quinqueradiata)Viscera SC-CO2 extraction method and solvent extraction methods.The yield of oil via SC-CO2 extraction: 11.03–40.87; Solvent extraction: 48.48 to 56.13.
Omega 3 PUFA content SC-CO2-extracted oils: 18.97 to 20.14; solvent-extracted oils: 20.37 to 21.38%.
[103]
Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis)LiverEnzymatic extraction (EE), wet reduction (WR), SC-CO2 extraction method, and subcritical dimethyl ether (SDE) extraction. Oils obtained with EE: 85.25 ± 1.29; WR: 56.76 ± 1.57; SC-CO2: 98.45 ± 1.04; and SDE: 98.57 ± 0.60.
PUFA content of EE oil: 29.41 ± 0.16; WR: 29.31 ± 0.19; SC-CO2: 32.77 ± 0.19; and SDE: 32.83 ± 0.16.
[104]
Horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus), seabream (Pagellus acarne), blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou), and sardine (Sardina pilchardus).Discards/by-productsPre-heated fish discards at 40 °C for 30 min, and then discards were hydraulically pressed (120 bar) and centrifuged to recover the crude oils.Yield of the oil, HM: 1 to 6.2; SB: 4.7 to 5.8; BW: 1.1 to 3.2; Sar: 2.5 to 18.8.
PUFA content, HM: 35 to 43.1; SB: 37.1 to 44.7; BW: 26.3 to 38.9; and Sar: 39.6 to 42.6.
[105]
Japanese Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius)Skin, muscle, bone, head, and visceraSC-CO2 extraction.
Temperature: 45 °C;
Pressure: 250 bar;
Extraction time: 3 h.
Oils obtained—skin: 42.79 ± 1.79; muscle: 24.18 ± 1.09; bone: 29.11 ± 1.81; head: 31.08 ± 2.05; and viscera: 22.70 ± 1.35.
PUFA content—skin: 27.54; muscle: 29.15; bone: 18.34; head: 21.88; viscera: 21.88.
[23]
Australian rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii)LiverSC-CO2 extraction method.
Temperature: 50 °C;
Pressure: 350 bar;
Extraction time: 4 h.
Oil obtained: 24.3% (w/w);
PUFA content: 31.3.
[106]
Conger eel (Conger myriaster)SkinSC-CO2 extraction method.
Temperature: 55 °C;
Pressure: 300 bar;
Extraction time: 2 h.
Crude lipid: 71.9 ± 0.12
PUFA content:
Omega 3: 18.62 ± 0.08;
Omega 6: 4.16 ± 0.19.
[55]
Frigate tuna (Auxis thazard), Eastern little tuna (Euthynnus affinis), and Longtail tuna (Thunnus tonggol). Viscera, skin, and headsSC-CO2 extraction method and solvent extraction methods.Crude oils obtained—viscera: 13.5–16.8; skin 21.8–26.4; and head 30.2–36.2.
PUFA content: 24.1–27.9 where docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was prominent.
[107]
Brazilian red-spotted shrimp (Farfantepenaeus paulensis)Shell, tail, and headsSC-CO2 extraction method.
Temperature: 40–60 °C;
Pressure: 200–400 bar.
Methods were reported about 4.9 ± 0.1% of oils obtained and optimized for carotenoid-rich oil extraction. PUFA content: EPA: 3.44 to 11.69; DHA: 2.25 to 12.20.[108]
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)Shell, tail, and headsSC-CO2 extraction.
Temperature: 40 °C;
Pressure: 350 bar.
Crude oils obtained—13.7
PUFA content—EPA: 7.8 ± 0.06;
DHA: 8.0 ± 0.07.
[109]
Brown seaweeds (Saccharina japonica and Sargassum horneri)Whole bodySC-CO2 extraction.
Temperature: 45 °C;
Pressure: 250 bar; Extraction time: 3 h.
Oil content: SJ: 1.09 ± 0.56; SH: 1.41 ± 0.15.
PUFA content: SJ: 14.67; SH: 26.7.
[110]

3.4. Fishery By-Products as a Source of Minerals

Bones and shells obtained from fishery by-products are excellent sources of minerals and micronutrients [24]. Several studies have investigated the extraction of bone powders from various fish species and their nutritional properties. Fish frames are obtainable in two forms: cooked and uncooked. The uncooked frame (bone) is obtained from industry filleting, while the cooked bone is available in restaurants (containing collagen) after thermal treatment [111]. Calcium and phosphorus are the two major minerals obtained from the fish frames. Calcium plays a vital role in our body by facilitating different physicochemical activities, including strengthening neurological functions, bone and tooth health, and acting as a cofactor in many enzymatic reactions [112]. Calcium deficiency may cause osteoporosis and hypocalcemia, whereas phosphorus deficiency may cause a problem in metabolism. Fishbone contains approximately 60% calcium and 35% phosphorus [113]. Therefore, several methods have been developed to extract minerals from fishery discards. Fishbone powder has long been used for food fortification. Furthermore, minerals can maintain the textural properties of fortified foods. Fishery discards like fish bones are excellent sources of hydroxyapatite, which can be used as bone grafting materials [114] and in dental treatments [24,115]. Table 5 shows the extraction of minerals from different fishery by-products and their potential uses.

3.5. Seafood Wastes as a Source of Pigments

The beautiful coloration of different seafood species, such as fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and seaweeds, is due to the presence of various coloring agents commonly known as carotenoids [3]. Natural carotenoids in seafood by-products have strong health-beneficial activities [127]. The common carotenoids obtained from seafood by-products are astaxanthin, cantaxanthin, zeaxanthin, β-carotene, etc. [127]. Although carotenoids have biological activities, astaxanthin (3,3′-dihydroxy-β, β′-carotene-4,4′-dione) (red–pink color) has anticancer, neuroprotective, and strong antioxidant activities [14]. Supposedly, astaxanthin has 500 times more antioxidant activity compared with tocopherol (Vit-E) [128]. Astaxanthin is also beneficial for improving cardiovascular health and regulating blood pressure. Owing to their highly beneficial activities, marine carotenoids are used in food products, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics [127]. Several carotenoids are used as preservatives in cosmetic products like ions and sun-protection creams [3]. Various carotenoids like α and β-carotene are the precursors of vitamin A and are considered trace elements for normal growth, immunological function, and vision [129]. Recently, carotenoid supplements for human consumption have become available on the market; hence, consumers are familiar with these products. The demand for marine carotenoids is booming and attracting the attention of scientists and industrialists [130].
In addition to carotenoids, other pigments are mainly obtained from marine algae, commonly known as phycobiliproteins. The major classes of phycobiliproteins are phycoerythrin (commonly found in red algae), phycocyanin (available in brown seaweed), and allophycocyanins [131]. Phycoerythrin has high antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activities and various health-beneficial activities [132].
There are various carotenoid extraction methods. An old method is the solvent extraction method. However, due to the drawbacks of solvent extraction [133], scientists are looking for green extraction methods such as SC-CO2 extraction [15,108], ionic liquid and deep eutectic solvent extraction [134], ultrasound-assisted extraction [15], microwave-assisted extraction [135], enzymatic hydrolysis [136], and extraction by various edible oils [89]. Owing to availability and market demand, astaxanthin extraction methods are highly established. Table 6 presents the extraction of the different pigments.

3.6. As a Source of Important Enzymes

Because of their lower side effects and higher bioactivities, enzymes are considered essential biomolecules [3]. Enzymes can work as catalytic agents for different reactions and, thus, reduce the cost of producing various compounds in different industries [137]. Enzymes from fishery by-products can be divided mainly into proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes [3]. Fishery by-products, especially viscera and head, are important sources of enzymes such as proteases and lipases [137]. Proteases are considered the most important class of enzymes, accounting for approximately 60% of the total enzyme market [3]. They are important for various food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic applications. The fish viscera’s most important protease enzymes are pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase [137]. Table 7 shows the enzymes available in fishery discards, their extraction methodologies, and their potential uses.
Fish enzymes have versatile applications in various industries. Protease enzymes play a vital role in the fish body during postmortem activities such as textural changes and flavor and trigger spoilage activities [138]. Another enzyme, serine protease, causes the black discoloration of shrimp by forming polyphenol oxidase [139]. In the industrial sector, proteases are used to extract valuable compounds from different raw materials via selective breakdown and can be used as substitutes for various biomolecules [3]. Lipolytic enzymes from seafood by-products are used to cleave the long chain of unsaturated fatty acids and prepare biodiesel [140]. Recent studies have reported that lipases extracted from seafood can be used to improve the flavor and odor of dairy products [141]. Several other enzymes also have commercial importance. Among them, chitinases [142], collagenases [143], and transglutaminases (TGase) [144] obtained from marine sources have notable industrial and medicinal importance. TGases isolated from different seafoods have been shown to improve the textural properties of various food products [145]. In addition to these mentioned enzymes, several other enzymes, such as ureases, alkaline phosphatase, phospholipases, alginate lyases, and xanthine oxidase, can also be extracted from fishery by-products [3].
Table 6. Extraction of natural pigments from marine fishery discards (types of fishery by-products used, extraction methodologies, types of pigments, and yield).
Table 6. Extraction of natural pigments from marine fishery discards (types of fishery by-products used, extraction methodologies, types of pigments, and yield).
Fish SpeciesParts of BodyExtraction MethodsType of PigmentsYieldReferences
Crabs, shrimp (Penaeus indicus), crayfish, krill, and lobsterCarapace and headsEnzymatic hydrolysis with Trypsin (2000 U/g), papain (6000 NF Units), and alcalase (0.6 Anson U/g)Crude carotenoidsHighest yield by alcalase 28.6 μg/g waste; papain (24.8 μg/g); and trypsin (25.3 μg/g).[136]
Freshwater crab (Potamon potamon) and marine crab (Charybdis cruciata)Shells and meatExtracted by solvent extraction with acetone and etherAstaxanthin, zeaxanthin, β-caroteneFrom the shell and meat of marine crab, astaxanthin was estimated about 65.5 and 67.6 g/100 g of carotenoids.
From the shell and meat of marine crab, zeaxanthin was estimated about 0.49 and 5.0 g/100 g of carotenoids.
From the shell and meat of marine crab, astaxanthin was estimated about 36.5 and 14.7 g/100 g of carotenoids.
Zeaxanthin from shell and meat of freshwater crab about 74.8 and 42.0 g/100 g of carotenoids.
The highest β-carotene was obtained from the meat of the freshwater crab, 7.4 g/10 g of carotenoids.
[146]
Spiny lobster (Panulirus japonicas)CarapaceAcetone extractionCanthaxanthin, astaxanthin, zeaxanthin, β-carotene, and adonixanthinTotal carotenoid yield: 0.1 mg/g carapace;
Canthaxanthin: 6g/100 g of carotenoids;
Astaxanthin: 65 g/100 g of carotenoids;
Zeaxanthin: 1.2 g/100 g of carotenoids;
β-carotene: 2g/100 g of carotenoids;
Adonixanthin: 1.2 g/100 g of carotenoids.
[147]
Shrimp (Peneanus monodon)ShellsConcurrent SC-CO2-extraction methodologyAstaxanthin-rich oilA new process design for extraction of astaxanthin has been proposed and the highest yield obtained was 43.09 µg/g of oil.[14]
Jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas)SkinsSolvent extraction with acidified methanolCrude natural pigment580 and 690 mg of pigment extract per 100 g of fresh squid skin.[148]
White shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)HepatopancreasAlkaline and heat treatment (1.0 M NaOH and pre-incubated at 60 °C)CarotenoproteinsCarotenoproteins contained—73.58% protein and major carotenoids identified as astaxanthin and β-carotene.[149]
Shrimp (Peneanus monodon)ShellsUltrasound-assisted natural deep eutectic solventAstaxanthinOptimized the extraction methodology using response surface methodology, and the highest yield of astaxanthin was obtained at 68.98 ± 1.22 μg ASX/g shrimp waste.[15]
Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei)By-productsUltrasonic-assisted ionic liquid extractionAstaxanthinAstaxanthin yield: 32.47 µg/g waste.[150]
Red shrimps (Aristeus antennatus)By-productsUltrasound and microwave-assisted natural deep eutectic solventAstaxanthinUltrasound-assisted extraction: 7.85 ± 0.47 mg of astaxanthin/100 g dry sample;
Ultrasound-assisted extraction: 26.7 ± 2 mg of astaxanthin/100 g dry sample.
[151]
Brown crab Shell residuesTerpene-based natural deep eutectic solventsAstaxanthinThe highest yield of astaxanthin was obtained at 9.3 ± 0.8 μg/g dry residue.[152]
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)By-productsSunflower oil (SF) and its methyl ester (ME-SF) AstaxanthinYield obtained with SF: 23 mg/kg waste; ME-SF: 34.2 mg/kg waste.[153]
Red microalgae (Porphyridium spp.)Seaweed Conventional extraction (maceration and freeze–thaw);
Green extraction: (microwave (MW) and ultrasound (US)).
PhycoerythrinThe highest yield by maceration is 15.93 mg/g biomass; freeze–thaw was 16.08 mg/g biomass.
Microwave: 23.94 mg/g biomass; ultrasound: 32.63 mg/g biomass.
[154]
Table 7. Enzymes extracted from different species of fishery by-products and their application.
Table 7. Enzymes extracted from different species of fishery by-products and their application.
Fish SpeciesBody PartsGroup and Name of the EnzymesApplication of Extracted EnzymesReferences
Pink shrimp (Parapenaeus
longirostris)
Gut, viscera and intestine. Polyphenoloxidase
-laccase
This enzyme exhibits very intense activity, and during storage, melanosis may continue to occur due to the oxidation of p-dihydroxyphenols produced mainly by non-specific hydroxylation of aromatic amino acids.[139]
Leather jacket (Aluterus monoceros)Pyloric caeca Protease—trypsinPreparation of protein hydrolysates with higher antioxidant activities.[155]
New Zealand hoki (Macruronus novaezealandiae) and chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)Liver and intestineDigestible lipasesFlavor development in dairy cream with extracted lipases and compared with calf pre-gastric esterase.[141]
Goby (Zosterisessor ophiocephalus)VisceraAlkaline protease—crude extractDeproteinization of shrimp wastes by extracted crude proteases.[156]
Whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)Muscle, pleopods, digestive gland, and uropodsLipasePotential role in the hydrolysis of triacylglycerides stored as fat in the shrimp body.[157]
Sardinelle
(Sardinella aurita)
VisceraA novel aspartic proteaseProteolytic activity was examined against natural food proteins.[158]
Silver mojarra (Diapterus rhombeus)VisceraAlkaline peptidase—trypsinWith high activity and stability at pH from 8.5 to 11, this enzyme has good potential to be used as an additive in commercial detergent formulations.[159]
Crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus)DiscardsTrans-glutaminase (TGase)Extracted crayfish TGase enzyme showed higher activity at low temperatures (4 °C) than pig liver TGase.[160]
Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), bigeye snapper (Priacanthus hamrur), common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Indian oil sardine (Sardinella longiceps)Fish muscle tissueTrans-glutaminase (TGase)Improvement of the setting and gelling ability of fish mince from Cynoglossus spp.[144]
Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba)By-productsTrans-glutaminase (TGase)Extracted enzymes enhanced the mechanical properties of gelatin gels at 4 °C.[161]

4. Macromolecules Obtained from Fishery By-Products

4.1. Gelatin and Collagen

Collagen proteins are obtained from fish by-products such as bones, skin, and cartilage and are found in the tissues of both vertebrates and invertebrates [162]. Both collagen and gelatin are highly used in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics sectors. The animal body is claimed to contain approximately 30% collagen of its total protein component [163]. Due to the religious aspect, marine collagen is highly acceptable to Muslim- and Hindu-based countries due to the religious restriction for consuming porcine and bovine collagen. Interest in marine collagen is expanding daily among scientists and industrialists due to its high demand and unique physicochemical properties, and it will reach a market value of 1055.2 million USD by 2026 [3].
The collagen molecule has a triple helix structure and comprises three polypeptide chains, and its molecular weight is approximately 100 kDa [164]. Collagen molecules can be subdivided into three types based on cross-linking intensity. Type-I collagen is available in all collective tissues, type-II is primarily found in cartilages, and type-III is mainly found in body parts such as the intestine [165]. Gelatin can be obtained via the heat treatment of collagen [164]. Gelatin obtained from marine fishery discards has lower rheological properties such as melting point and viscosity; however, it has good homeostatic properties compared with mammalian gelatin and better metabolic compatibility [166].
Marine teleosts are considered important sources of collagen as they contain 75% of their total body weight [162]. Marine fishery discards, particularly fish skin, scales, and bones, are sustainable and cost-effective sources of collagen. As the interest in marine collagen is increasing, several scientists have extracted collagen from fishery by-products such as cod skin [167], fish scales [168], tuna skin and scales [169], squid fins and arms [170], and salmon scales and skin [171]. Collagen from marine fishery by-products is mainly extracted using acid solubilization. However, different enzymes, such as collagenase, can also be used to target this valuable macromolecule [172]. The collagen yield highly depends on the species and can vary from 1% to 50% of the raw materials [3].
Collagen has been used in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. Purified collagen has been used for tissue engineering by preparing different biomaterials such as gels, scaffolds, sponges, and nanocomposites [173]. Gelatin is used for preparing biodegradable packing films and nanoparticles, microencapsulating various bioactive compounds, and tuning the texture properties of foods [174]. Table 8 shows recent studies on the extraction of collagen, gelatin, and their derivatives.
As previously mentioned, collagen has a huge potential in the pharmaceutical industry [175]. Due to its biocompatibility and biodegradability, collagen and its derivatives are widely used in different medicinal products. A recent study showed the potential of collagen-based dressing for drug delivery as an attractive and promising system in medical applications [176]. Collagen or gelatin and their derivatives can also be used for tissue engineering and quick wound healing (Figure 4). It has also been reported that collagen scaffolds can play an important role in bone and cartilage reconstruction [177]. Different facial creams prepared with collagen are popular due to their activity [162,178].

4.2. Seafood By-Products as Sustainable Sources of Polysaccharides

Seafood discards, especially the shells of crustaceans, exoskeletons of mollusks, and seaweeds, are sources of various polysaccharides [179]. The utilization of crustacean by-products is challenging because they contain approximately 75% of discards, are not easily decomposed in nature, and are considered an environmental hazard [180]. Chitin and chitosan extraction from crustacean shells are well-known, and they have a long history of application in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries [179]. Chitin is a highly available polysaccharide after cellulose, which comprises 1,4-poly-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. The most exciting information is that approximately 100 billion tons of chitin can be generated from nature if we can use all the resources, such as insects, crustacean shells, fungi, and all other organisms [181]. According to several studies, the market value of chitin was 6.8 billion USD in 2019, and by 2027, its market value is expected to increase by 24.7%, indicating its necessity in various industries [182]. By deacetylating chitin, another popular polysaccharide, chitosan (poly-β-1,4–2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose), can be generated [183]. This polymer is well-known for its diverse applications in various fields. It is biodegradable [184], nontoxic [183], and has multiple biofunctional activities such as antioxidant [185], antimicrobial [186], antifungal [187], anticancer [183], and wound healing activities [188]. This functional biomolecule also helps lower cholesterol levels [189], acts as an anti-inflammatory agent [190], and inhibits tumor formation [191]. The diverse applications of chitosan also include biodegradable packaging, nanocomposite preparation, drug delivery, the preparation of various hydrogels, and therapeutic agents. Low-molecular-weight chitosans or the oligomers of chitins and chitosans are called chitooligosaccharides [182]. They are highly soluble in water and have better functionality than native chitin and chitosan [183].
Chitin extraction through conventional processes requires high heat and various chemicals. Chitin extraction usually has three steps: (i) demineralization, which requires the application of strong acids, including HCl, HNO3, and H2SO4; (ii) deproteinization by alkaline treatment using NaOH or KOH; and (iii) decolorization by organic solvents. However, after chitin extraction, an extra step called deacetylation by alkaline treatment using strong NaOH or KOH is necessary [183]. Due to the application of synthetic chemicals during chitin and chitosan extraction, they impose hazardous effects on the environment; scientists are looking for different green and eco-friendly approaches to extract these valuable molecules. Recently, several green extraction methods have been used to extract chitin and chitosan. They include the application of bacterial fermentation [192], enzymatic hydrolysis [193], subcritical water [194], ultrasound [195], microwave-assisted [196], ionic liquid [197], deep eutectic solvents [198], and pulsed electric field extraction [199].
Fucoidan is an important sulfated polysaccharide available in marine algae (brown seaweed) and different invertebrates such as sea cucumbers and sea urchins [200]. Researchers have been very interested in this marine polysaccharide because of its biological potential since it was discovered in 1913 [200]. It is negatively charged and hygroscopic [201]. The solubility of this polysaccharide in both water and acid solutions makes it a suitable candidate for medicinal applications over other sulfated polysaccharides [202]. In recent decades, fucoidans isolated from marine sources have been extensively studied to discover their potential use in the medical sector. Fucoidans have strong antioxidant, anticoagulant, antitumor, and antiviral activities [203]. They are also effective in improving the digestive and urinary systems [204]. The main constituents of fucoidan are fucose and sulfate. However, the chemical structure also contains different monosaccharides such as glucose, galactose, and other compounds such as uronic acid [200].
Fucoidan extraction via conventional methods, such as dilution in acetic acid, has a long history [203]. Crude fucoidan extracted via conventional methods often contains different contaminants, requiring purification. Column chromatography is a popular technique for purifying fucoidan [204]. Recently, various green extraction methods have been applied to extract fucoidan, such as subcritical water extraction [205] (Figure 5), ultrasound-assisted extraction [206], and microwave-assisted extraction [207]. Table 9 shows recent studies on the extraction of polysaccharides, their extraction methods, and the functionalities of the extracted polysaccharides.
Figure 4. Chitosan-gelatin-based hydrogel loaded with drugs has been applied to treat diabetic foot ulcers. “Adapted with permission from Razack et al. [188]. 2022, Elsevier B.V.”.
Figure 4. Chitosan-gelatin-based hydrogel loaded with drugs has been applied to treat diabetic foot ulcers. “Adapted with permission from Razack et al. [188]. 2022, Elsevier B.V.”.
Marinedrugs 21 00485 g004
Figure 5. Subcritical water hydrolysis is a promising and alternative green extraction method to obtain polymers and hydrolysates from seafood by-products. This figure has been adapted from our previous study by Lee et al. [56].
Figure 5. Subcritical water hydrolysis is a promising and alternative green extraction method to obtain polymers and hydrolysates from seafood by-products. This figure has been adapted from our previous study by Lee et al. [56].
Marinedrugs 21 00485 g005
Table 8. Extraction of collagen and gelatin and their derivatives, their functionalities, and their potential applications from various fishery discards.
Table 8. Extraction of collagen and gelatin and their derivatives, their functionalities, and their potential applications from various fishery discards.
Fish SpeciesBody PartsType of Collagen/GelatinYield Properties/Finding of the StudyReferences
Bullhead shark (Heterodontus japonicas), Ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis), Horse mackerel (Trachurus japonicas), Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), yellow sea bream (Dentex tumifrons), chub mackerel (Scomber japonicas), and Japanese sea-bass (Lateolabrax japonicas) Fins, bones, and skinsAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC)(1) Skin collagen, 51.4% (Japanese sea-bass), 49.8% (chub mackerel), and 50.1% (bullhead shark), respectively; (2) bone collagen, 42.3% (skipjack tuna), 40.7% (Japanese sea-bass), 53.6% (ayu), 40.1% (yellow sea bream), and 43.5% (horse mackerel), respectively; (3) fin collagen, 5.2% (Japanese sea-bass acid-soluble collagen) and 36.4% (Japanese sea-bass acid-insoluble collagen).This report indicates that these fish waste materials have the potential to supplement the skin of land vertebrates as a source of collagen.[208]
Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorous niphonius)Skin Acid-solubilized collagen (ASC)The collagen obtained from the skin is 13.68 ± 0.35%.Antioxidant activities; emulsifying properties of the extracted collagen varied by average molecular weight.[209]
Jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas)Skin and finsExtraction of acid-solubilized collagen (ASC) and then enzymatic hydrolysisCollagen was obtained—from fin: 69%; and
from skin: 66% (based on dry wt.).
Extracted collagen showed higher levels of polar and hydrophobic amino acids. The collagen hydrolysates produced by subtilisin showed a lower degree of hydrolysis and higher antioxidant activity.[170]
Smooth-hound (Mustelus mustelus)SkinAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC) and pepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC)Collagen obtained—ASC (acid-soluble): 23.07%; and
PSC (pepsin-soluble): 35.27% of the sample.
Extracted collagen used for preparing films with chitosan and prepared biofilm showed potential UV barrier properties and antioxidant activity.[210]
Red drum fish (Sciaenops ocellatus)ScalesAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC) and pepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC)Collagen obtained—ASC (acid-soluble): 0.61 ± 0.20%; and
PSC (pepsin-soluble): 4.32 ± 0.30% of the sample.
Type-I collagen was isolated rapidly via hydrophilic ultrafiltration from the scales of red drum fish (Sciaenops ocellatus) after limited pepsin digestion.[168]
Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)Bones, scales, and skinAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC) and pepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC)Collagen was obtained from skin—ASC (acid-soluble) 13.05 ± 0.6%; and
PSC (pepsin-soluble) 16.7 ± 0.7% based on dry wt.
Collagen was obtained from scale and bone—PSC (pepsin-soluble) 4.6 ± 0.3% and 2.6 ± 0.3% based on dry wt.
This study concluded physiochemical properties of extracted fish collagen were comparable to mammalian collagen.[169]
Black ruff (Centrolophus niger)SkinAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC)The yield of the extracted collagen varied from 25% to 45% based on the skin weight.Extraction and characterization of collagen from fish waste and its application in the development of antibacterial active food-packaging film.[211]
Atlantic cod and Atlantic salmon Scales and skinAcid-solubilized collagen (ASC)Yield of collagen—Atlantic salmon: skin 11.95% and fins: 5.76%.
Atlantic cod: skin: 3.46% and fins: 4.34% based on wet tissue.
Salmon scales and skin had very high collagen levels, allowing them to be promising sources for high-value collagen production.[171]
Eel fish (Evenchelys macrura)Skin Acid-solubilized collagen (ASC) and pepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC)Collagen yield—ASC: 80% and PSC: 7.1% based on the dry weight of the skin.The ASC and PSC gels and films also showed equal potency in delivering drugs against bacterial and fungal human pathogens.[212]
Blue whiting (BW, Micromesistius poutassou), Mackerel (M, Scomber scombrus), Red scorpionfish (RS, Scorpaena scrofa), and Pouting (P, Trisoreptus luscus)Heads and skinsExtraction of gelatin using a sequential combination of 0.05 M NaOH, 0.02 M H2SO4, and 0.05 M citric acid solutions.Yield of the gelatin (%. w/w fresh skin)—BW: 0.23 ± 0.05;
M: 0.69 ± 0.33;
RS: 0.28 ± 0.11;
P: 0.56 ± 0.25.
Extracted gelatin showed strong antioxidant and antihypertensive activity.[10]
Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus)SkinExtraction of gelatin via acid-based and heat treatmentGelatin yield varied from 29.6 to 31.8%.The chemical composition, rheological and textural properties, and microstructural characteristics of the extracted gelatins were analyzed and compared with commercial bovine hide gelatin.[213]
Mackerel (Scomber japonicus)Bone and skinCollagen hydrolysate using subcritical water hydrolysisSubcritical water treatment produced low-molecular-weight (<1650 Da) collagen peptides.The antioxidant activities of collagen hydrolysate obtained via subcritical water hydrolysis were significantly higher than native collagen.[214]
Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)Bones, scales, and skinCollagen hydrolysate via catalyst-assisted subcritical water hydrolysisThe average molecular size of the peptides in the obtained collagen hydrolysates varied between 300 and 425 Da.The collagen hydrolysates obtained in this study showed enormous potential for use in the food and pharmaceutical industries.[215]
Totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi)Swim bladderPepsin-solubilized collagen (PSC) and collagen hydrolysates via enzymatic hydrolysis (Alcalase and papain)The yield of collagen was high (68%) and exhibited good thermal stability (32.5 °C).This study reported that the swim bladder from the farmed totoaba could be an ideal source to produce high-quality type-I collagen and may be considered an alternative to conventional collagen sources.[216]
Table 9. Conventional and green extraction methods for extracting polysaccharides from marine fishery discards and their functionalities.
Table 9. Conventional and green extraction methods for extracting polysaccharides from marine fishery discards and their functionalities.
SeafoodBody PartsExtraction MethodsPolysaccharideYieldProperties/CharacteristicsReferences
Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)Heads Demineralization and deproteinization through HCl and NaOH solutions.
The deacetylation process obtained chitosan
Chitin and chitosanChitin and chitosan were obtained from shrimp waste processing about 25 ± 2 g/kg and 17 ± 4 g/kg.Anticoagulant properties and anti-inflammatory activity.[217]
ShrimpShrimp wasteChitin extracted with conventional methods. Chiton extracted using
microwave-assisted extraction
Chitin and
chitosan
The maximum yield obtained from shrimp waste was about 36.43% (based on dry wt.), and the highest chitosan yield was 90% based on the chitin wt.Antibacterial, functional, antioxidant, and physicochemical properties.[218]
Shrimp (Metapenaeus monoceros)ShellsEnzymatic extractions by several microbial and fish alkaline proteasesChitin and chitosanConcerning microbial enzyme preparation, high deproteinization (DDP) degrees were obtained with 77 ± 3%.Antimicrobial, antitumor, and antioxidant activities. [219]
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)Thorax, heads, and appendix by-productsEnzymatic extraction (protease from Bacillus lentus)ChitinThe yield of the chitin extracted from Norway lobster was 24.6 ± 1.02% (based on dry wt.).Antiproliferative and antimicrobial activities. [220]
Shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicas)ShellsDeep eutectic solvent extractionChitinA higher yield was obtained compared with the conventional extraction (16.08%).Extracted chitins showed excellent potential for preparing biodegradable packaging film.[198]
Lobster ShellsDES (Deep eutectic solvent)ChitinThe highest yield of chitin was 23.31% with Choline chloride-lactic acid deep eutectic solvent.Acid-based deep eutectic solvents have the potential for use as green media for the production of chitin.[12]
ShrimpShellsExtraction by ammonium-based ionic liquidsChitin and chitosanA chitin extraction of 14% of the original biomass was found after shrimp-shell treatment with ionic liquids.The experimental results revealed that ionic liquids could be a potential medium for chitin extraction.[197]
PrawnShellsMicrobial extraction (fermentation)Chitin and chitosanThe highest yield of chitin was 0.78%, with a higher degree of deacetylation of 72.90%.A higher degree of deacetylation is valued compared with the commercial chitin.[221]
ShrimpShellsUltrasound-assisted extractionChitin and chitosanUltrasound reduces the protein content and particle size of chitin.Chitosan of high deacetylation and medium molecular weight was produced, and the extracted chitosan was applied for beef preservation.[222]
Swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus)ShellsSubcritical water pretreatmentChitosanThe yield and the molecular weight of the chitosan were 12.2% and 1187.2 kDa, respectively.Chitosan prepared via subcritical water pretreatment was easier to use in preparing oligosaccharides.[223]
Shrimp (Penaeus monodon)ShellsSubcritical waterOligochitosanSubcritical water hydrolysis reduces the molecular weight of the chitosan (3.06 kDa).Oligochitosan showed potent antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities.[183]
ShrimpShellsFermentation by Pseudonocardia antitumoralisChitooligosaccharidesThe results indicate that the isolate Pseudonocardia antitumoralis 18D36-A1 could convert chitin into chitooligosaccharides.The extract produced the active fraction D36A1C38, which can inhibit the growth of fungi by 74% at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.[224]
ShrimpDiscardsCo-fermentation in the presence of Bacillus subtilis and Acetobacter sp.ChitooligosaccharidesFinal deproteinization (DP) and demineralization (DM) efficiency and the chitin yield were achieved as 94, 92, and 18%.The proposed method exhibited excellent stability and high hydrolysis efficiency.[225]
Brown algae (Turbinara ornata)Seaweed powderConventional methods in acid dilutionFucoidan10 different fractions of the crude fucoidan were obtained, and the highest sulfate content was reported as 38.34%.This study claimed to be the first report to illustrate the potential anti-inflammatory activity of fucoidan extracted from the brown algae T. ornata.[204]
Brown seaweed (Saccharina japonica)Seaweed powderSubcritical water extraction (SWE) with different solventsFucoidanThe highest yield of crude fucoidan was 8.23 at 140 °C, 50 bar, and 0.1% NaOH solvent.A high yield of fucoidan was obtained from SWE when compared with the conventional method, and crude fucoidan showed high antioxidant and emulsifying activity properties.[205]
Brown seaweed (Fucus vesiculosus)Seaweed powderMicrowave-assisted extraction (MAE)FucoidanThe highest yield of fucoidan was 15.61%, and its sulfate content was 22.76%.This method required short extraction times and non-corrosive solvents, resulting in reduced costs for green extraction techniques.[207]

5. Conclusions and Implication of This Review Work

This study summarized the presence of valuable bioactive compounds and their functionalities. In recent decades, the massive production of fishery products has introduced enormous fish discards. Some are effectively used in agriculture (fertilizers), animal foods, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. However, most discards are disposed of in the sea or other water bodies and negatively impact environmental status. Thus, they need to be managed with effective fishery management. Valorizing fish by-products for industries is challenging, and the necessary techniques should be taken. Most methods are costly and challenging to manage.
Caruso et al. [24] indicated that the losses of bioactive compounds from the by-products due to poor handling and dumping negatively affect the environment. Thus, to overcome these problems, the most effective techniques were used to extract or isolate bioactive compounds (e.g., lipids, proteins, chitin, enzymes, peptides, etc.) and use those valuable nutrients as food ingredients (with regulated food quality, production, distribution, and proper marketing). Enzymatic hydrolysis, SC-CO2 extraction, subcritical water extraction, and other green extraction methods can be applied for the complete valorization of these by-products. However, the development of techniques and methods to effectively valorize seafood discards is ongoing. We believe that this narrative study for an up-to-date understanding of fishery discards’ valorization will provide scientists and researchers with new insights into the extraction of valuable treasures from seafood discards. However, the application of bioactive compounds from fishery sources is increasing daily among health-conscious consumers. Food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic products from several bioactive compounds, such as PUFA-containing fish oil, collagen, gelatin, and peptides, are available. Due to consumer demand, this field is flourishing and requires further and advanced research. It is believed that the ocean will be the source of various medicinal products in the future, as seafood already provides thousands of valuable bioactive compounds to humans.
To achieve a sustainable and hunger-free world, minimizing the discarding of food products is essential. From the food perspective, fishery by-products have tremendous potential for the blue economy and the initiative toward zero-waste management. More studies are required to develop an innovative approach to utilizing fishery discards and extracting their bioactive and nutritional compounds, which can ensure a circular economy in fishery-based industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.C.R.; Methodology, V.C.R.; Validation, V.C.R., H.-J.L. and B.-S.C.; Formal Analysis, V.C.R., M.R.I. and S.S.; Data Curation, V.C.R., M.R.I., S.S., M.Y. and J.-S.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, V.C.R.; Writing—Review and Editing, V.C.R.; Supervision, V.C.R. and B.-S.C.; Funding Acquisition, B.-S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2023R1A2C1005569).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are shown within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stankus, A. State of World Aquaculture 2020 and Regional Reviews: FAO Webinar Series. In FAO Aquaculture Newsletter; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021; pp. 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Roda, M.A.P.; Gilman, E.; Huntington, T.; Kennelly, S.J.; Suuronen, P.; Chaloupka, M.; Medley, P. A Third Assessment of Global Marine Fisheries Discards; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ozogul, F.; Cagalj, M.; Šimat, V.; Ozogul, Y.; Tkaczewska, J.; Hassoun, A.; Kaddour, A.A.; Kuley, E.; Rathod, N.B.; Phadke, G.G. Recent developments in valorisation of bioactive ingredients in discard/seafood processing by-products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 559–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haque, A.R.; Park, J.-S.; Ho, T.C.; Roy, V.C.; Ali, M.S.; Kiddane, A.T.; Kim, G.-D.; Chun, B.-S. Characterization of oil and amino acids obtained from yellow corvina by-products using subcritical and supercritical fluids. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2023, 199, 105970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kiddane, A.T.; Roy, V.C.; Kang, M.J.; Patil, M.P.; Chun, B.S.; Kim, G.D. Anticancer and apoptotic activity in neuroblastoma SK-N-SH using phospholipid extract from bone of Scomberomorus niphonius. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2022, 102, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nawaz, A.; Li, E.; Irshad, S.; Xiong, Z.; Xiong, H.; Shahbaz, H.M.; Siddique, F. Valorization of fisheries by-products: Challenges and technical concerns to food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, J.-S.; Han, J.-M.; Shin, Y.-N.; Park, Y.-S.; Shin, Y.-R.; Park, S.-W.; Roy, V.C.; Lee, H.-J.; Kumagai, Y.; Kishimura, H. Exploring Bioactive Compounds in Brown Seaweeds Using Subcritical Water: A Comprehensive Analysis. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haq, M.; Ahmed, R.; Cho, Y.-J.; Chun, B.-S. Quality properties and bio-potentiality of edible oils from Atlantic salmon by-products extracted by supercritial carbon dioxide and conventional methods. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 1953–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sasidharan, A.; Venugopal, V. Proteins and co-products from seafood processing discards: Their recovery, functional properties and applications. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 5647–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vázquez, J.A.; Fernández-Compás, A.; Blanco, M.; Rodríguez-Amado, I.; Moreno, H.; Borderías, J.; Pérez-Martín, R.I. Development of bioprocesses for the integral valorisation of fish discards. Biochem. Eng. J. 2019, 144, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ghaly, A.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Brooks, M.; Budge, S.; Dave, D. Fish processing wastes as a potential source of proteins. Amino acids and oils: A critical review. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2013, 5, 107–129. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hong, S.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, P.; Lian, H. Versatile acid base sustainable solvent for fast extraction of various molecular weight chitin from lobster shell. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 201, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, L.; Bi, S.; Pang, J.; Sun, M.; Feng, C.; Chen, X. Preparation and characterization of chitosan from crab shell (Portunus trituberculatus) by NaOH/urea solution freeze-thaw pretreatment procedure. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roy, V.C.; Getachew, A.T.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Chun, B.-S. Recovery and bio-potentialities of astaxanthin-rich oil from shrimp (Penaeus monodon) waste and mackerel (Scomberomous niphonius) skin using concurrent supercritical CO2 extraction. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 159, 104773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roy, V.C.; Ho, T.C.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Nam, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Getachew, A.T.; Chun, B.-S. Extraction of astaxanthin using ultrasound-assisted natural deep eutectic solvents from shrimp wastes and its application in bioactive films. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 125417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. FAO. FAO Yearbook. In Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ezquerra-Brauer, J.M.; Aubourg, S.P. Recent trends for the employment of jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) by-products as a source of bioactive compounds with nutritional, functional and preservative applications: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silva, T.H.; Mesquita-Guimarães, J.; Henriques, B.; Silva, F.S.; Fredel, M.C. The potential use of oyster shell waste in new value-added by-product. Resources 2019, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arbia, W.; Arbia, L.; Adour, L.; Amrane, A. Chitin extraction from crustacean shells using biological methods—A review. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 51, 12–25. [Google Scholar]
  20. Peng, Q.; Nunes, L.M.; Greenfield, B.K.; Dang, F.; Zhong, H. Are Chinese consumers at risk due to exposure to metals in crayfish? A bioaccessibility-adjusted probabilistic risk assessment. Environ. Int. 2016, 88, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, T.T.; Barber, A.R.; Corbin, K.; Zhang, W. Lobster processing by-products as valuable bioresource of marine functional ingredients, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2017, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chung, H.; Cadwallader, K.R. Volatile components in blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) meat and processing by-product. J. Food Sci. 1993, 58, 1203–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Roy, V.C.; Park, J.-S.; Ho, T.C.; Chun, B.-S. Lipid indexes and quality evaluation of omega-3 rich oil from the waste of Japanese spanish mackerel extracted by supercritical CO2. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Caruso, G.; Floris, R.; Serangeli, C.; Di Paola, L. Fishery wastes as a yet undiscovered treasure from the sea: Biomolecules sources, extraction methods and valorization. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, Z.X.; Ying, R.F.; Shi, L.E. Physicochemical and functional characteristics of proteins treated by a pH-shift process: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siddik, M.A.; Howieson, J.; Fotedar, R.; Partridge, G.J. Enzymatic fish protein hydrolysates in finfish aquaculture: A review. Rev Aquac. 2021, 13, 406–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Celus, I.; Brijs, K.; Delcour, J.A. Enzymatic hydrolysis of brewers’ spent grain proteins and technofunctional properties of the resulting hydrolysates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8703–8710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Venugopal, V.; Sasidharan, A. Seafood industry effluents: Environmental hazards, treatment and resource recovery. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, H.J.; Lee, G.-W.; Yoon, I.S.; Park, S.H.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.-S.; Heu, M.S. Preparation and characterization of protein isolate from Yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares roe by isoelectric solubilization/precipitation process. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2016, 19, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Taha, A.; Hu, H.; Pan, S. The role of conformational state of pH-shifted β-conglycinin on the oil/water interfacial properties and emulsifying capacities. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 105990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, S.; Rehman, A.; Shah, H.; Aadil, R.M.; Ali, A.; Shehzad, Q.; Ashraf, W.; Yang, F.; Karim, A.; Khaliq, A. Fish protein and its derivatives: The novel applications, bioactivities, and their functional significance in food products. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 1607–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roy, V.C.; Chamika, W.A.S.; Park, J.-S.; Ho, T.C.; Khan, F.; Kim, Y.-M.; Chun, B.-S. Preparation of bio-functional surimi gel incorporation of fish oil and green tea extracts: Physico-chemical activities, in-vitro digestibility, and bacteriostatic properties. Food Control 2021, 130, 108402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tan, Y.; Chang, S.K.C.; Meng, S. Comparing the kinetics of the hydrolysis of by-product from channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) fillet processing by eight proteases. LWT 2019, 111, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hassan, M.A.; Deepitha, R.; Xavier, K.M.; Gupta, S.; Nayak, B.B.; Balange, A.K. Evaluation of the properties of spray dried visceral protein hydrolysate from Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1978) extracted by enzymatic and chemical methods. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 2547–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vázquez, J.A.; Blanco, M.; Massa, A.E.; Amado, I.R.; Pérez-Martín, R.I. Production of fish protein hydrolysates from Scyliorhinus canicula discards with antihypertensive and antioxidant activities by enzymatic hydrolysis and mathematical optimization using response surface methodology. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.-M.; Zhang, B.; Deng, S.-G. Isolation and characterization of three antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of bluefin leatherjacket (Navodon septentrionalis) heads. J. Funct. Foods. 2015, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bougatef, A.; Nedjar-Arroume, N.; Manni, L.; Ravallec, R.; Barkia, A.; Guillochon, D.; Nasri, M. Purification and identification of novel antioxidant peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of sardinelle (Sardinella aurita) by-products proteins. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nikoo, M.; Benjakul, S.; Yasemi, M.; Gavlighi, H.A.; Xu, X. Hydrolysates from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) processing by-product with different pretreatments: Antioxidant activity and their effect on lipid and protein oxidation of raw fish emulsion. LWT 2019, 108, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gómez, L.J.; Gómez, N.A.; Zapata, J.E.; López-García, G.; Cilla, A.; Alegría, A. Optimization of the red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) viscera hydrolysis for obtaining iron-binding peptides and evaluation of in vitro iron bioavailability. Foods 2020, 9, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Giannetto, A.; Esposito, E.; Lanza, M.; Oliva, S.; Riolo, K.; Di Pietro, S.; Abbate, J.M.; Briguglio, G.; Cassata, G.; Cicero, L. Protein hydrolysates from anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) waste: In vitro and in vivo biological activities. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B.; Hu, F.-Y.; Wang, Y.-M.; Zhang, B.; Deng, S.-G.; Wu, C.-W. Purification and identification of three novel antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of bluefin leatherjacket (Navodon septentrionalis) skin. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nguyen, T.T.; Zhang, W.; Barber, A.R.; Su, P.; He, S. Microwave-intensified enzymatic deproteinization of Australian rock lobster shells (Jasus edwardsii) for the efficient recovery of protein hydrolysate as food functional nutrients. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sampath Kumar, N.; Nazeer, R.; Jaiganesh, R. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from the skin protein hydrolysate of two marine fishes, horse mackerel (Magalaspis cordyla) and croaker (Otolithes ruber). Amino Acids 2012, 42, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aspevik, T.; Totland, C.; Lea, P.; Oterhals, Å. Sensory and surface-active properties of protein hydrolysates based on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by-products. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lima, D.A.S.; Santos, M.M.F.; Duvale, R.L.F.; Bezerra, T.K.A.; Araújo, Í.B.d.S.; Madruga, M.S.; da Silva, F.A.P. Technological properties of protein hydrolysate from the cutting byproduct of serra spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus brasiliensis). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 2952–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Batista, I.; Ramos, C.; Coutinho, J.; Bandarra, N.; Nunes, M. Characterization of protein hydrolysates and lipids obtained from black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) by-products and antioxidative activity of the hydrolysates produced. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choksawangkarn, W.; Phiphattananukoon, S.; Jaresitthikunchai, J.; Roytrakul, S. Antioxidative peptides from fish sauce by-product: Isolation and characterization. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2018, 52, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tripoteau, L.; Bedoux, G.; Gagnon, J.; Bourgougnon, N. In vitro antiviral activities of enzymatic hydrolysates extracted from byproducts of the Atlantic holothurian Cucumaria frondosa. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.-X.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Qiu, Y.-T.; Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B. Identification and Active Evaluation of Antioxidant Peptides from Protein Hydrolysates of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Head. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, X.-R.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Qiu, Y.-T.; Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B. Preparation and Characterization of Gelatin and Antioxidant Peptides from Gelatin Hydrolysate of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Bone Stimulated by in vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Noman, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yin, L.; Abed, S.M. Fractionation and purification of antioxidant peptides from Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) protein hydrolysates prepared using papain and alcalase 2.4L. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vázquez, J.A.; Menduíña, A.; Nogueira, M.; Durán, A.I.; Sanz, N.; Valcarcel, J. Optimal Production of Protein Hydrolysates from Monkfish By-Products: Chemical Features and Associated Biological Activities. Molecules 2020, 25, 4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lapeña, D.; Vuoristo, K.S.; Kosa, G.; Horn, S.J.; Eijsink, V.G. Comparative assessment of enzymatic hydrolysis for valorization of different protein-rich industrial byproducts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9738–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. He, S.; Nguyen, T.T.; Su, P.; Zhang, W. Protein hydrolysates produced from rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) Head: Emulsifying capacity and food safety. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 4, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Park, J.-S.; Roy, V.C.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-C.; Chun, B.-S. Extraction of edible oils and amino acids from eel by-products using clean compressed solvents: An approach of complete valorization. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, H.-J.; Roy, V.C.; Ho, T.C.; Park, J.-S.; Jeong, Y.-R.; Lee, S.-C.; Kim, S.-Y.; Chun, B.-S. Amino Acid Profiles and Biopotentiality of Hydrolysates Obtained from Comb Penshell (Atrina pectinata) Viscera Using Subcritical Water Hydrolysis. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bhandari, D.; Rafiq, S.; Gat, Y.; Gat, P.; Waghmare, R.; Kumar, V. A review on bioactive peptides: Physiological functions, bioavailability and safety. Int. J. Pept. Res. 2020, 26, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B. Marine Bioactive Peptides—Structure, Function and Application. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abuine, R.; Rathnayake, A.U.; Byun, H.-G. Biological activity of peptides purified from fish skin hydrolysates. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2019, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lassoued, I.; Mora, L.; Nasri, R.; Jridi, M.; Toldrá, F.; Aristoy, M.-C.; Barkia, A.; Nasri, M. Characterization and comparative assessment of antioxidant and ACE inhibitory activities of thornback ray gelatin hydrolysates. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 13, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peinado, I.; Koutsidis, G.; Ames, J. Production of seafood flavour formulations from enzymatic hydrolysates of fish by-products. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abdelhedi, O.; Jridi, M.; Jemil, I.; Mora, L.; Toldrá, F.; Aristoy, M.-C.; Boualga, A.; Nasri, M.; Nasri, R. Combined biocatalytic conversion of smooth hound viscera: Protein hydrolysates elaboration and assessment of their antioxidant, anti-ACE and antibacterial activities. Food Res. Int. 2016, 86, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Beaulieu, L.; Thibodeau, J.; Bonnet, C.; Bryl, P.; Carbonneau, M.-É. Detection of antibacterial activity in an enzymatic hydrolysate fraction obtained from processing of Atlantic rock crab (Cancer irroratus) by-products. PharmaNutrition 2013, 1, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abachi, S.; Bazinet, L.; Beaulieu, L. Antihypertensive and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory peptides from fish as potential cardioprotective compounds. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yuan, L.; Sun, L.; Zhuang, Y. Preparation and identification of novel inhibitory angiotensin-I-converting enzyme peptides from tilapia skin gelatin hydrolysates: Inhibition kinetics and molecular docking. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5251–5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yaghoubzadeh, Z.; Peyravii Ghadikolaii, F.; Kaboosi, H.; Safari, R.; Fattahi, E. Antioxidant activity and anticancer effect of bioactive peptides from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) skin hydrolysate. Int. J. Pept. Res. 2020, 26, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ngo, D.-H.; Vo, T.-S.; Ryu, B.; Kim, S.-K. Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from Pacific cod skin gelatin using ultrafiltration membranes. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1622–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Girgih, A.T.; He, R.; Hasan, F.M.; Udenigwe, C.C.; Gill, T.A.; Aluko, R.E. Evaluation of the in vitro antioxidant properties of a cod (Gadus morhua) protein hydrolysate and peptide fractions. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ghalamara, S.; Silva, S.; Brazinha, C.; Pintado, M. Valorization of fish by-products: Purification of bioactive peptides from codfish blood and sardine cooking wastewaters by membrane processing. Membranes 2020, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gajanan, P.G.; Elavarasan, K.; Shamasundar, B.A. Bioactive and functional properties of protein hydrolysates from fish frame processing waste using plant proteases. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 24901–24911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ishak, N.H.; Sarbon, N.M. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions of waste from shortfin scad (Decapterus Macrosoma) for the production of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide using response surface methodology. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, 1735. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kim, S.-B.; Yoon, N.Y.; Shim, K.-B.; Lim, C.-W. Antioxidant and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities of northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) by-products hydrolysate by enzymatic hydrolysis. Fish Aquatic Sci. 2016, 19, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pan, X.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Hu, F.-Y.; Wang, B. Preparation and identification of antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of skate (Raja porosa) cartilage. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cai, L.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Ma, S.; Li, J. Purification and characterization of three antioxidant peptides from protein hydrolysate of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) skin. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 16, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Sun, S.; Liu, R.; Hong, B.; Gao, R.; Bai, K. Processing Optimization and Characterization of Angiotensin-Ι-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides from Lizardfish (Synodus macrops) Scale Gelatin. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tang, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Qian, H.; Qi, X. Targeted separation of antibacterial peptide from protein hydrolysate of anchovy cooking wastewater by equilibrium dialysis. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sae-Leaw, T.; Karnjanapratum, S.; O’Callaghan, Y.C.; O’Keeffe, M.B.; FitzGerald, R.J.; O’Brien, N.M.; Benjakul, S. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from gelatin hydrolysate of seabass skin. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Neves, A.C.; Harnedy, P.A.; O’Keeffe, M.B.; FitzGerald, R.J. Bioactive peptides from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with angiotensin converting enzyme and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory, and antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, W.-Y.; Wang, Y.-M.; Ge, M.-X.; Wu, H.-W.; Zheng, S.-L.; Zheng, H.-Y.; Wang, B. Production, identification, in silico analysis, and cytoprotection on H2O2-induced HUVECs of novel angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from Skipjack tuna roes. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1197982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Bonneil, É.; Simpson, B.K. Generation of antioxidative peptides from Atlantic sea cucumber using alcalase versus trypsin: In vitro activity, de novo sequencing, and in silico docking for in vivo function prediction. Food Chem. 2020, 306, 125581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sun, R.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Miao, J.; Leng, K.; Gao, H. Preparation process optimization, structural characterization and in vitro digestion stability analysis of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) peptides-zinc chelate. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 128056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Suárez-Jiménez, G.M.; Burgos-Hernández, A.; Torres-Arreola, W.; López-Saiz, C.M.; Velázquez Contreras, C.A.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J.M. Bioactive peptides from collagen hydrolysates from squid (Dosidicus gigas) by-products fractionated by ultrafiltration. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahmed, R.; Chun, B.-S. Subcritical water hydrolysis for the production of bioactive peptides from tuna skin collagen. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 141, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, S.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Wang, Y.-M.; Yang, X.-R.; Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B. Gelatins and antioxidant peptides from Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) skins: Purification, characterization, and cytoprotection on ultraviolet-A injured human skin fibroblasts. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 102138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Suo, S.-K.; Zheng, S.-L.; Chi, C.-F.; Luo, H.-Y.; Wang, B. Novel angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from tuna byproducts—Milts: Preparation, characterization, molecular docking study, and antioxidant function on H2O2-damaged human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 957778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Li, H.-L.; Chen, Y.-N.; Cai, J.; Liao, T.; Zu, X.-Y. Identification, Screening and Antibacterial Mechanism Analysis of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides from Sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus) Spermary. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sheng, Y.; Qiu, Y.-T.; Wang, Y.-M.; Chi, C.-F.; Wang, B. Novel Antioxidant Collagen Peptides of Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenserbaerii) Cartilages: The Preparation, Characterization, and Cytoprotection of H2O2-Damaged Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs). Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Li, J.; Lu, J.; Asakiya, C.; Huang, K.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Q.; He, X. Extraction and Identification of Three New Urechis unicinctus Visceral Peptides and Their Antioxidant Activity. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ahmadkelayeh, S.; Hawboldt, K. Extraction of lipids and astaxanthin from crustacean by-products: A review on supercritical CO2 extraction. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sahena, F.; Zaidul, I.S.M.; Jinap, S.; Karim, A.A.; Abbas, K.A.; Norulaini, N.A.N.; Omar, A.K.M. Application of supercritical CO2 in lipid extraction—A review. J. Food Eng. 2009, 95, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lange, K.W. Omega-3 fatty acids and mental health. Glob. Health J. 2020, 4, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Al Khawli, F.; Pateiro, M.; Domínguez, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Gullón, P.; Kousoulaki, K.; Ferrer, E.; Berrada, H.; Barba, F.J. Innovative Green Technologies of Intensification for Valorization of Seafood and Their By-Products. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Their Health Benefits. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 345–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, J.; Han, L.; Wang, D.; Sun, Y.; Huang, J.; Shahidi, F. Stability and stabilization of omega-3 oils: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Denomme, J.; Stark, K.D.; Holub, B.J. Directly Quantitated Dietary (n-3) Fatty Acid Intakes of Pregnant Canadian Women Are Lower than Current Dietary Recommendations. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Swanson, D.; Block, R.; Mousa, S.A. Omega-3 Fatty Acids EPA and DHA: Health Benefits Throughout Life. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wei, W.; Hu, M.; Huang, J.; Yu, S.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Mao, L. Anti-obesity effects of DHA and EPA in high fat-induced insulin resistant mice. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 1614–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Solomando, J.C.; Antequera, T.; González-Mohíno, A.; Perez-Palacios, T. Fish oil/lycopene microcapsules as a source of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids: A case study on spreads. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1875–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kadam, S.U.; Prabhasankar, P. Marine foods as functional ingredients in bakery and pasta products. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1975–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Perez-Palacios, T.; Ruiz-Carrascal, J.; Solomando, J.C.; de-la-Haba, F.; Pajuelo, A.; Antequera, T. Recent Developments in the Microencapsulation of Fish Oil and Natural Extracts: Procedure, Quality Evaluation and Food Enrichment. Foods 2022, 11, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Šimat, V.; Vlahović, J.; Soldo, B.; Generalić Mekinić, I.; Čagalj, M.; Hamed, I.; Skroza, D. Production and characterization of crude oils from seafood processing by-products. Food Biosci. 2020, 33, 100484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bruno, S.F.; Kudre, T.G.; Bhaskar, N. Impact of pretreatment-assisted enzymatic extraction on recovery, physicochemical and rheological properties of oil from Labeo rohita head. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e12990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Franklin, E.C.; Haq, M.; Roy, V.C.; Park, J.-S.; Chun, B.-S. Supercritical CO2 extraction and quality comparison of lipids from Yellowtail fish (Seriola quinqueradiata) waste in different conditions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fang, Y.; Liu, S.; Hu, W.; Zhang, J.; Ding, Y.; Liu, J. Extraction of Oil from High-Moisture Tuna Livers by Subcritical Dimethyl Ether: A Comparison with Different Extraction Methods. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1800087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Morales-Medina, R.; García-Moreno, P.J.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; Muñío, M.M.; Guadix, A.; Guadix, E.M. Nutritional indexes, fatty acids profile, and regiodistribution of oil extracted from four discarded species of the Alboran Sea: Seasonal effects. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2016, 118, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nguyen, T.T.; Zhang, W.; Barber, A.R.; Su, P.; He, S. Significant Enrichment of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) in the Lipids Extracted by Supercritical CO2 from the Livers of Australian Rock Lobsters (Jasus edwardsii). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4621–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ferdosh, S.; Sarker, Z.I.; Norulaini, N.; Oliveira, A.; Yunus, K.; Chowdury, A.J.; Akanda, J.; Omar, M. Quality of Tuna Fish Oils Extracted from Processing the By-Products of Three Species of Neritic Tuna Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sánchez-Camargo, A.P.; Martinez-Correa, H.A.; Paviani, L.C.; Cabral, F.A. Supercritical CO2 extraction of lipids and astaxanthin from Brazilian redspotted shrimp waste (Farfantepenaeus paulensis). J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2011, 56, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Treyvaud Amiguet, V.; Kramp, K.L.; Mao, J.; McRae, C.; Goulah, A.; Kimpe, L.E.; Blais, J.M.; Arnason, J.T. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of polyunsaturated fatty acids from Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis Kreyer) processing by-products. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sivagnanam, S.P.; Yin, S.; Choi, J.H.; Park, Y.B.; Woo, H.C.; Chun, B.S. Biological Properties of Fucoxanthin in Oil Recovered from Two Brown Seaweeds Using Supercritical CO2 Extraction. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3422–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Abdel-Moemin, A.R. Healthy cookies from cooked fish bones. Food Biosci. 2015, 12, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kim, S.K.; Jung, W.K. 15—Fish and bone as a calcium source. In Maximising the Value of Marine By-Products; Shahidi, F., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2007; pp. 328–339. [Google Scholar]
  113. Kim, S.-K.; Mendis, E. Bioactive compounds from marine processing byproducts—A review. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ideia, P.; Degli Esposti, L.; Miguel, C.C.; Adamiano, A.; Iafisco, M.; Castilho, P.C. Extraction and characterization of hydroxyapatite-based materials from grey triggerfish skin and black scabbardfish bones. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2021, 18, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Larsen, R.; Eilertsen, K.-E.; Elvevoll, E.O. Health benefits of marine foods and ingredients. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Popescu-Pelin, G.; Ristoscu, C.; Duta, L.; Pasuk, I.; Stan, G.E.; Stan, M.S.; Popa, M.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Hapenciuc, C.; Oktar, F.N.; et al. Fish Bone Derived Bi-Phasic Calcium Phosphate Coatings Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition for Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kiyochi Junior, H.d.J.; Candido, A.G.; Bonadio, T.G.M.; da Cruz, J.A.; Baesso, M.L.; Weinand, W.R.; Hernandes, L. In vivo evaluation of interactions between biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP)-niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5) nanocomposite and tissues using a rat critical-size calvarial defect model. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 31, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Fernández-Arias, M.; Álvarez-Olcina, I.; Malvido-Fresnillo, P.; Vázquez, J.A.; Boutinguiza, M.; Comesaña, R.; Pou, J. Biogenic Calcium Phosphate from Fish Discards and By-Products. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Neto, A.S.; Brazete, D.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Cuttlefish Bone-Derived Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Coated with Sol-Gel Derived Bioactive Glass. Materials 2019, 12, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Isloor, A.M.; Anil, S.; Venkatesan, J.; Kumar, G.C.M. Calcium phosphate bioceramics with polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels for biomedical applications. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 125404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Boutinguiza, M.; Pou, J.; Comesaña, R.; Lusquiños, F.; de Carlos, A.; León, B. Biological hydroxyapatite obtained from fish bones. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhu, Q.; Ablikim, Z.; Chen, T.; Cai, Q.; Xia, J.; Jiang, D.; Wang, S. The preparation and characterization of HA/β-TCP biphasic ceramics from fish bones. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 12213–12220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Behera, R.R.; Das, A.; Pamu, D.; Pandey, L.M.; Sankar, M.R. Mechano-tribological properties and in vitro bioactivity of biphasic calcium phosphate coating on Ti-6Al-4V. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2018, 86, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dou, W.; Chen, H.; Chen, T.; Zhu, Q.; Jiang, D.; Xue, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Tang, W. Design and construction of a microporous -containing HA/β-TCP biphasic ceramic as a novel bone graft material. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 025401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kongsri, S.; Janpradit, K.; Buapa, K.; Techawongstien, S.; Chanthai, S. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from fish scale waste: Preparation, characterization and application for selenium adsorption in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 215–216, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bas, M.; Daglilar, S.; Kuskonmaz, N.; Kalkandelen, C.; Erdemir, G.; Kuruca, S.E.; Tulyaganov, D.; Yoshioka, T.; Gunduz, O.; Ficai, D.; et al. Mechanical and Biocompatibility Properties of Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics Derived from Salmon Fish Bone Wastes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ashraf, S.A.; Adnan, M.; Patel, M.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Sachidanandan, M.; Snoussi, M.; Hadi, S. Fish-Based Bioactives as Potent Nutraceuticals: Exploring the Therapeutic Perspective of Sustainable Food from the Sea. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Higuera-Ciapara, I.; Félix-Valenzuela, L.; Goycoolea, F.M. Astaxanthin: A Review of its Chemistry and Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Krinsky, N.I.; Landrum, J.T.; Bone, R.A. Biologic mechanisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2003, 23, 171–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhu, X.; Meng, C.; Sun, F.; Wei, Z.; Chen, L.; Chen, W.; Tong, S.; Du, H.; Gao, J.; Ren, J.; et al. Sustainable production of astaxanthin in microorganisms: The past, present, and future. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Pangestuti, R.; Kim, S.-K. Biological activities and health benefit effects of natural pigments derived from marine algae. J. Funct. Foods 2011, 3, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Subhashini, J.; Mahipal, S.V.K.; Reddy, M.C.; Mallikarjuna Reddy, M.; Rachamallu, A.; Reddanna, P. Molecular mechanisms in C-Phycocyanin induced apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line-K562. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 68, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Gimeno, M.; Ramírez-Hernández, J.Y.; Mártinez-Ibarra, C.; Pacheco, N.; García-Arrazola, R.; Bárzana, E.; Shirai, K. One-Solvent Extraction of Astaxanthin from Lactic Acid Fermented Shrimp Wastes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10345–10350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lee, Y.R.; Row, K.H. Comparison of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents as additives for the ultrasonic extraction of astaxanthin from marine plants. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 39, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhou, X.; Ding, W.; Jin, W. Chapter 17—Microwave-assisted extraction of lipids, carotenoids, and other compounds from marine resources. In Innovative and Emerging Technologies in the Bio-Marine Food Sector; Garcia-Vaquero, M., Rajauria, G., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 375–394. [Google Scholar]
  136. Sachindra, N.M.; Mahendrakar, N.S. Effect of Protease Treatment on Oil Extractability of Carotenoids from Shrimp Waste. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2011, 20, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Borges, S.; Odila, J.; Voss, G.; Martins, R.; Rosa, A.; Couto, J.A.; Almeida, A.; Pintado, M. Fish By-Products: A Source of Enzymes to Generate Circular Bioactive Hydrolysates. Molecules 2023, 28, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yang, F.; Rustad, T.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Xia, W. Endogenous proteolytic enzymes—A study of their impact on cod (Gadus morhua) muscle proteins and textural properties in a fermented product. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Martínez-Alvarez, O.; Montero, P.; Gómez-Guillén, C. Evidence of an active laccase-like enzyme in deepwater pink shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris). Food Chem. 2008, 108, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Ahlawat, S.; Kumawat, M.; Babele, P.K. Microbial Enzymes in Food Technology. In Enzymes in Food Technology: Improvements and Innovations; Kuddus, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  141. Kurtovic, I.; Marshall, S.N.; Miller, M.R.; Zhao, X. Flavour development in dairy cream using fish digestive lipases from Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and New Zealand hoki (Macruronus novaezealandiae). Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Proespraiwong, P.; Tassanakajon, A.; Rimphanitchayakit, V. Chitinases from the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon: Phylogenetics, expression and activities. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. 2010, 156, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bhagwat, P.K.; Dandge, P.B. Collagen and collagenolytic proteases: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Binsi, P.K.; Shamasundar, B.A. Purification and characterisation of transglutaminase from four fish species: Effect of added transglutaminase on the viscoelastic behaviour of fish mince. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1922–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Shahidi, F.; Janak Kamil, Y.V.A. Enzymes from fish and aquatic invertebrates and their application in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 435–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sachindra, N.M.; Bhaskar, N.; Mahendrakar, N.S. Carotenoids in crabs from marine and fresh waters of India. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Suhnel, S.; Lagreze, F.; Ferreira, J.F.; Campestrini, L.H.; Maraschin, M. Carotenoid extraction from the gonad of the scallop Nodipecten nodosus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae). Braz. J. Biol. 2009, 69, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Enrique Chan-Higuera, J.s.; Antonio Carbonell-Barrachina, A.; Luis Cárdenas-López, J.; Kačániová, M.; Burgos- Burgos-Hernández, A.; Marina Ezquerra-Brauer, J. Jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) skin pigments: Chemical analysis and evaluation of antimicrobial and antimutagenic potential. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2019, 9, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Senphan, T.; Benjakul, S.; Kishimura, H. Characteristics and antioxidative activity of carotenoprotein from shells of Pacific white shrimp extracted using hepatopancreas proteases. Food Biosci. 2014, 5, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gao, J.; You, J.; Kang, J.; Nie, F.; Ji, H.; Liu, S. Recovery of astaxanthin from shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) waste by ultrasonic-assisted extraction using ionic liquid-in-water microemulsions. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Koutsoukos, S.; Tsiaka, T.; Tzani, A.; Zoumpoulakis, P.; Detsi, A. Choline chloride and tartaric acid, a Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent for the efficient extraction of phenolic and carotenoid compounds. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Rodrigues, L.A.; Pereira, C.V.; Leonardo, I.C.; Fernández, N.; Gaspar, F.B.; Silva, J.M.; Reis, R.L.; Duarte, A.R.C.; Paiva, A.; Matias, A.A. Terpene-Based Natural Deep Eutectic Systems as Efficient Solvents To Recover Astaxanthin from Brown Crab Shell Residues. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2246–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Razi Parjikolaei, B.; Bahij El-Houri, R.; Fretté, X.C.; Christensen, K.V. Influence of green solvent extraction on carotenoid yield from shrimp (Pandalus borealis) processing waste. J. Food Eng. 2015, 155, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ardiles, P.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Salinas-Fuentes, F.; Órdenes, D.; Renato, G.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Biochemical Composition and Phycoerythrin Extraction from Red Microalgae: A Comparative Study Using Green Extraction Technologies. Processes 2020, 8, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zamani, A.; Benjakul, S. Trypsin from unicorn leatherjacket (Aluterus monoceros) pyloric caeca: Purification and its use for preparation of fish protein hydrolysate with antioxidative activity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 962–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sila, A.; Nasri, R.; Bougatef, A.; Nasri, M. Digestive Alkaline Proteases from the Goby (Zosterisessor ophiocephalus): Characterization and Potential Application as Detergent Additive and in the Deproteinization of Shrimp Wastes. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2012, 21, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rivera-Pérez, C.; del Toro, M.d.l.Á.N.; García-Carreño, F. Purification and characterization of an intracellular lipase from pleopods of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. 2011, 158, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Khaled, H.B.; Ghorbel-Bellaaj, O.; Hmidet, N.; Jellouli, K.; Ali, N.E.-H.; Ghorbel, S.; Nasri, M. A novel aspartic protease from the viscera of Sardinelle (Sardinella aurita): Purification and characterisation. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Silva, J.F.; Espósito, T.S.; Marcuschi, M.; Ribeiro, K.; Cavalli, R.O.; Oliveira, V.; Bezerra, R.S. Purification and partial characterisation of a trypsin from the processing waste of the silver mojarra (Diapterus rhombeus). Food Chem. 2011, 129, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Sirikharin, R.; Söderhäll, I.; Söderhäll, K. Characterization of a cold-active transglutaminase from a crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Simpson, B.K. A cold active transglutaminase from Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): Purification, characterization and application in the modification of cold-set gelatin gel. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Sionkowska, A.; Adamiak, K.; Musiał, K.; Gadomska, M. Collagen Based Materials in Cosmetic Applications: A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Birk, D.E.; Bruckner, P. Collagen Suprastructures. In Collagen: Primer in Structure, Processing and Assembly; Brinckmann, J., Notbohm, H., Müller, P.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 185–205. [Google Scholar]
  164. Alfaro, A.d.T.; Balbinot, E.; Weber, C.I.; Tonial, I.B.; Machado-Lunkes, A. Fish Gelatin: Characteristics, Functional Properties, Applications and Future Potentials. Food Eng. Rev. 2015, 7, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Turnay, J.; Fernández-Díaz, M.D.; Ulmo, N.; Lizarbe, M.A.; Montero, P. Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from different marine species: A comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. 2002, 16, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Oliveira, V.d.M.; Assis, C.R.D.; Costa, B.d.A.M.; Neri, R.C.d.A.; Monte, F.T.D.; Freitas, H.M.S.d.C.V.; França, R.C.P.; Santos, J.F.; Bezerra, R.d.S.; Porto, A.L.F. Physical, biochemical, densitometric and spectroscopic techniques for characterization collagen from alternative sources: A review based on the sustainable valorization of aquatic by-products. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1224, 129023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Skierka, E.; Sadowska, M. The influence of different acids and pepsin on the extractability of collagen from the skin of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua). Food Chem. 2007, 105, 1302–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Chen, S.; Chen, H.; Xie, Q.; Hong, B.; Chen, J.; Hua, F.; Bai, K.; He, J.; Yi, R.; Wu, H. Rapid isolation of high purity pepsin-soluble type I collagen from scales of red drum fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ahmed, R.; Haq, M.; Chun, B.-S. Characterization of marine derived collagen extracted from the by-products of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Cuevas-Acuña, D.A.; Robles-Sanchez, R.M.; Torres-Arreola, W.; Marquez-Rios, E.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J.-M. Collagen from jumbo squid fin: Extracting conditions and influence of the protease system on collagen hydrolysate antioxidant activity. CyTA J. Food 2016, 14, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Dave, D.; Liu, Y.; Clark, L.; Dave, N.; Trenholm, S.; Westcott, J. Availability of marine collagen from Newfoundland fisheries and aquaculture waste resources. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sousa, R.O.; Alves, A.L.; Carvalho, D.N.; Martins, E.; Oliveira, C.; Silva, T.H.; Reis, R.L. Acid and enzymatic extraction of collagen from Atlantic cod (Gadus Morhua) swim bladders envisaging health-related applications. J. Biomat. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2020, 31, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Felician, F.F.; Xia, C.; Qi, W.; Xu, H. Collagen from Marine Biological Sources and Medical Applications. Chem. Biodivers. 2018, 15, e1700557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ho, T.C.; Lim, J.-S.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, S.-Y.; Chun, B.-S. In Vitro Biodegradation, Drug Absorption, and Physical Properties of Gelatin&ndash;Fucoidan Microspheres Made of Subcritical-Water-Modified Fish Gelatin. Mar Drugs 2023, 21, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ahmed, M.; Verma, A.K.; Patel, R. Collagen extraction and recent biological activities of collagen peptides derived from sea-food waste: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 18, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Langasco, R.; Cadeddu, B.; Formato, M.; Lepedda, A.J.; Cossu, M.; Giunchedi, P.; Pronzato, R.; Rassu, G.; Manconi, R.; Gavini, E. Natural collagenic skeleton of marine sponges in pharmaceutics: Innovative biomaterial for topical drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Elango, J.; Zhang, J.; Bao, B.; Palaniyandi, K.; Wang, S.; Wenhui, W.; Robinson, J.S. Rheological, biocompatibility and osteogenesis assessment of fish collagen scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 91, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Avila Rodríguez, M.I.; Rodríguez Barroso, L.G.; Sánchez, M.L. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018, 17, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. El Knidri, H.; Belaabed, R.; Addaou, A.; Laajeb, A.; Lahsini, A. Extraction, chemical modification and characterization of chitin and chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Saima; Kuddus, M.; Roohi; Ahmad, I.Z. Isolation of novel chitinolytic bacteria and production optimization of extracellular chitinase. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2013, 11, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yan, N.; Chen, X. Sustainability: Don’t waste seafood waste. Nature 2015, 524, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Pandit, A.; Indurkar, A.; Deshpande, C.; Jain, R.; Dandekar, P. A systematic review of physical techniques for chitosan degradation. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ali, M.S.; Ho, T.C.; Razack, S.A.; Haq, M.; Roy, V.C.; Park, J.-S.; Kang, H.W.; Chun, B.-S. Oligochitosan recovered from shrimp shells through subcritical water hydrolysis: Molecular size reduction and biological activities. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2023, 196, 105868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Kucukgulmez, A.; Celik, M.; Yanar, Y.; Sen, D.; Polat, H.; Kadak, A.E. Physicochemical characterization of chitosan extracted from Metapenaeus stebbingi shells. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan Preparation from Marine Sources. Structure, Properties and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M. Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Hussain, I.; Singh, T.; Chittenden, C. Preparation of chitosan oligomers and characterization: Their antifungal activities and decay resistance. Holzforschung 2012, 66, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Razack, S.A.; Lee, Y.; Shin, H.; Duraiarasan, S.; Chun, B.-S.; Kang, H.W. Cellulose nanofibrils reinforced chitosan-gelatin based hydrogel loaded with nanoemulsion of oregano essential oil for diabetic wound healing assisted by low level laser therapy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 220–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Choi, C.-R.; Kim, E.-K.; Kim, Y.-S.; Je, J.-Y.; An, S.-H.; Lee, J.D.; Wang, J.H.; Ki, S.S.; Jeon, B.-T.; Moon, S.-H.; et al. Chitooligosaccharides decreases plasma lipid levels in healthy men. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Yang, E.-J.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kim, S.C.; Lee, N.H.; Hyun, C.-G. Anti-inflammatory effect of chitosan oligosaccharides in RAW 264.7 cells. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2010, 5, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Xu, W.; Jiang, C.; Kong, X.; Liang, Y.; Rong, M.; Liu, W. Chitooligosaccharides and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine stimulate peripheral blood mononuclear cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 6, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tan, J.S.; Abbasiliasi, S.; Lee, C.K.; Phapugrangkul, P. Chitin extraction from shrimp wastes by single step fermentation with Lactobacillus acidophilus FTDC3871 using response surface methodology. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hongkulsup, C.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V.; Niranjan, K. Enzyme assisted extraction of chitin from shrimp shells (Litopenaeus vannamei). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 91, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Espíndola-Cortés, A.; Moreno-Tovar, R.; Bucio, L.; Gimeno, M.; Ruvalcaba-Sil, J.L.; Shirai, K. Hydroxyapatite crystallization in shrimp cephalothorax wastes during subcritical water treatment for chitin extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 172, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wardhono, E.Y.; Pinem, M.P.; Kustiningsih, I.; Effendy, M.; Clausse, D.; Saleh, K.; Guénin, E. Heterogeneous deacetylation reaction of chitin under low-frequency ultrasonic irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Sebastian, J.; Rouissi, T.; Brar, S.K.; Hegde, K.; Verma, M. Microwave-assisted extraction of chitosan from Rhizopus oryzae NRRL 1526 biomass. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Tolesa, L.D.; Gupta, B.S.; Lee, M.-J. Chitin and chitosan production from shrimp shells using ammonium-based ionic liquids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Saravana, P.S.; Ho, T.C.; Chae, S.-J.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, H.-J.; Chun, B.-S. Deep eutectic solvent-based extraction and fabrication of chitin films from crustacean waste. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Psarianos, M.; Dimopoulos, G.; Ojha, S.; Cavini, A.C.M.; Bußler, S.; Taoukis, P.; Schlüter, O.K. Effect of pulsed electric fields on cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour: Extraction yield (protein, fat and chitin) and techno-functional properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 76, 102908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Li, B.; Lu, F.; Wei, X.; Zhao, R. Fucoidan: Structure and Bioactivity. Molecules 2008, 13, 1671–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Cui, K.; Tai, W.; Shan, X.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Yu, G. Structural characterization and anti-thrombotic properties of fucoidan from Nemacystus decipiens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1817–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Luthuli, S.; Wu, S.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wu, M.; Tong, H. Therapeutic Effects of Fucoidan: A Review on Recent Studies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Jayawardena, T.U.; Nagahawatta, D.P.; Fernando, I.P.S.; Kim, Y.-T.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, W.-S.; Lee, J.S.; Jeon, Y.-J. A Review on Fucoidan Structure, Extraction Techniques, and Its Role as an Immunomodulatory Agent. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Jayawardena, T.U.; Fernando, I.P.S.; Lee, W.W.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Kim, H.-S.; Lee, D.-S.; Jeon, Y.-J. Isolation and purification of fucoidan fraction in Turbinaria ornata from the Maldives; Inflammation inhibitory potential under LPS stimulated conditions in in-vitro and in-vivo models. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Saravana, P.S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, Y.-B.; Woo, H.-C.; Chun, B.-S. Structural, antioxidant, and emulsifying activities of fucoidan from Saccharina japonica using pressurized liquid extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 153, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Flórez-Fernández, N.; López-García, M.; González-Muñoz, M.J.; Vilariño, J.M.L.; Domínguez, H. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of fucoidan from Sargassum muticum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Rodriguez-Jasso, R.M.; Mussatto, S.I.; Pastrana, L.; Aguilar, C.N.; Teixeira, J.A. Microwave-assisted extraction of sulfated polysaccharides (fucoidan) from brown seaweed. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Nagai, T.; Suzuki, N. Isolation of collagen from fish waste material—Skin, bone and fins. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Chi, C.-F.; Cao, Z.-H.; Wang, B.; Hu, F.-Y.; Li, Z.-R.; Zhang, B. Antioxidant and Functional Properties of Collagen Hydrolysates from Spanish Mackerel Skin as Influenced by Average Molecular Weight. Molecules 2014, 19, 11211–11230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Ben Slimane, E.; Sadok, S. Collagen from Cartilaginous Fish By-Products for a Potential Application in Bioactive Film Composite. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bhuimbar, M.V.; Bhagwat, P.K.; Dandge, P.B. Extraction and characterization of acid soluble collagen from fish waste: Development of collagen-chitosan blend as food packaging film. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Veeruraj, A.; Arumugam, M.; Ajithkumar, T.; Balasubramanian, T. Isolation and characterization of drug delivering potential of type-I collagen from eel fish Evenchelys macrura. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Khiari, Z.; Rico, D.; Martin-Diana, A.B.; Barry-Ryan, C. Valorization of fish by-products: Rheological, textural and microstructural properties of mackerel skin gelatins. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2017, 19, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Asaduzzaman, A.K.M.; Getachew, A.T.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Haq, M.; Chun, B.-S. Characterization of pepsin-solubilized collagen recovered from mackerel (Scomber japonicus) bone and skin using subcritical water hydrolysis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 1290–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Haq, M.; Ho, T.C.; Ahmed, R.; Getachew, A.T.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Chun, B.-S. Biofunctional properties of bacterial collagenolytic protease-extracted collagen hydrolysates obtained using catalysts-assisted subcritical water hydrolysis. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 81, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Cruz-López, H.; Rodríguez-Morales, S.; Enríquez-Paredes, L.M.; Villarreal-Gómez, L.J.; True, C.; Olivera-Castillo, L.; Fernández-Velasco, D.A.; López, L.M. Swim Bladder of Farmed Totoaba macdonaldi: A Source of Value-Added Collagen. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Cahú, T.B.; Santos, S.D.; Mendes, A.; Córdula, C.R.; Chavante, S.F.; Carvalho, L.B.; Nader, H.B.; Bezerra, R.S. Recovery of protein, chitin, carotenoids and glycosaminoglycans from Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) processing waste. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Mahdy Samar, M.; El-Kalyoubi, M.H.; Khalaf, M.M.; Abd El-Razik, M.M. Physicochemical, functional, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of chitosan extracted from shrimp wastes by microwave technique. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2013, 58, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Younes, I.; Hajji, S.; Frachet, V.; Rinaudo, M.; Jellouli, K.; Nasri, M. Chitin extraction from shrimp shell using enzymatic treatment. Antitumor, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Sayari, N.; Sila, A.; Abdelmalek, B.E.; Abdallah, R.B.; Ellouz-Chaabouni, S.; Bougatef, A.; Balti, R. Chitin and chitosan from the Norway lobster by-products: Antimicrobial and anti-proliferative activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 87, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Tan, Y.N.; Lee, P.P.; Chen, W.N. Microbial extraction of chitin from seafood waste using sugars derived from fruit waste-stream. AMB Express 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Vallejo-Domínguez, D.; Rubio-Rosas, E.; Aguila-Almanza, E.; Hernández-Cocoletzi, H.; Ramos-Cassellis, M.E.; Luna-Guevara, M.L.; Rambabu, K.; Manickam, S.; Siti Halimatul Munawaroh, H.; Loke Show, P. Ultrasound in the deproteinization process for chitin and chitosan production. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 72, 105417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Hao, G.; Hu, Y.; Shi, L.; Chen, J.; Cui, A.; Weng, W.; Osako, K. Physicochemical characteristics of chitosan from swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) shells prepared by subcritical water pretreatment. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Widyastuti, W.; Setiawan, F.; Al Afandy, C.; Irawan, A.; Laila, A.; Juliasih, N.L.; Setiawan, W.A.; Arai, M.; Hendri, J.; Setiawan, A. Antifungal Agent Chitooligosaccharides Derived from Solid-State Fermentation of Shrimp Shell Waste by Pseudonocardia antitumoralis 18D36-A1. Fermentation 2022, 8, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Chen, Y.; Ling, Z.; Mamtimin, T.; Khan, A.; Peng, L.; Yang, J.; Ali, G.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; et al. Chitooligosaccharides production from shrimp chaff in chitosanase cell surface display system. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Extraction of various bioactive compounds from different fishery by-products.
Figure 1. Extraction of various bioactive compounds from different fishery by-products.
Marinedrugs 21 00485 g001
Figure 2. The nutrients from fishery by-products can be used for food fortification. “Adapted with permission from Nawaz et al. [6]. 2020, Elsevier Ltd.”.
Figure 2. The nutrients from fishery by-products can be used for food fortification. “Adapted with permission from Nawaz et al. [6]. 2020, Elsevier Ltd.”.
Marinedrugs 21 00485 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction for extracting high-quality oils from marine resources. This is a promising green technology for extracting fish oil. This figure has been adapted from our previously published article by Roy et al. [23].
Figure 3. Diagram of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction for extracting high-quality oils from marine resources. This is a promising green technology for extracting fish oil. This figure has been adapted from our previously published article by Roy et al. [23].
Marinedrugs 21 00485 g003
Table 1. Major by-products are obtained from various seafoods.
Table 1. Major by-products are obtained from various seafoods.
GroupsName of the SeafoodBy-ProductsReferences
Body PartsPercentage (w/w)
MolluscaOctopus, squid, cuttlefishSkin, heads, fins, tentacles, and gutsUp to 60[17]
Clam, oyster, scallop, mussel, etc.Shells and viscera60–80[18]
CrustaceanCrayfishHead and shellUp to 80[19,20]
ShrimpHead, shell, and tail40–45[14,15]
LobsterHeads, shells, livers, and eggs50–70[21]
CrabViscera, shellUp to 85[22]
Finfish and other cartilaginous fishesTrimming2–5[6,11,23]
Skin1–5
Scales2–4
Bones10–34
Liver and gut15–20
Head15–20
Table 5. Extraction of fish minerals and their application in the preparation of various products for biomedical applications.
Table 5. Extraction of fish minerals and their application in the preparation of various products for biomedical applications.
SpeciesBody PartExtraction of Minerals Final Products and ActivitiesReferences
Salmon (Salmo salar) and sea bream (Sparus aurata).Bones Alkaline treatment (NaOH) for 24 h; Calcination at 850 °C for 4 h.Fishbone-derived biphasic calcium phosphate coatings with improved textural, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties.[116]
Spotted sorubim (Pseudoplatystoma corruscans).BonesCleaned and washed with hot water; Calcination with 900 °C temperature.Nanocomposite with improved mechanical and physical properties.[117]
Grey triggerfish
(Balistes capriscus) and Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo).
Skin and bones Isolation of hydroxyapatite 400, 600, 800, 1000 °C temperature.Preparation of natural biphasic materials for targeting bone grafting.[113]
Salmon (Salmo salar), Red scorpionfish (Scorpaena scrofa), and Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus).BonesBiogenic calcium phosphate was obtained via alkaline (hydrolysis) treatment and calcination with 750, 900 °C temperatures.Biphasic carbonated hydroxyapatite (HA)/beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and their application in the biomedical field.[118]
Cuttlefish (Sepia
Officinalis).
BonesCalcination with 700 °C temperature for 120 min.Biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds targeting bone tissue engineering applications.[119]
Cuttlefish (Sepia
Officinalis).
BonesBoiling in water, dipped for 1 h; Calcination with 900 °C temperature for 240 min.Synthesis of biphasic calcium phosphate for hydrogel sample preparation.[120]
Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and sword fish (Xiphias gladius). BonesBoiled and wasted water jet (strong) for 1 h; Calcination with 600, 950 °C temperature 12 h.Biological hydroxyapatite for biomedical application.[121]
Sardine, salmon (Salmo salar), and sablefish (Anoplopoma
Fimbria).
BonesBoiled for 2 h with deionized water and flowing water wasted; Calcination with 600–1100 °C temperature for 60 min.HA/β-TCP biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics (BCP) are produced from fish bones.[122]
Nile tilapia (Tilapia nilotica).ScalesDistilled water wasted and dried up; Calcination with 800 °C temperature.Obtained hydroxyapatite powder for preparing biphasic calcium phosphate coating.[123]
Salmon (Salmo salar).BonesBoiled for 2 h with deionized water and flowing water wasted; Calcination with 600 °C temperature for 60 min.Construction of HA/β-TCP biphasic ceramic as a novel bone graft material.[124]
Nile tilapia (Tilapia nilotica).ScalesWashed with 0.1 M HCl several times and dried at 60 °C after washing with distilled water. Afterwards, alkaline treatment with NaOH at 100 °C to obtain the hydroxyapatite.Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and its application for selenium adsorption in aqueous solution. [125]
Salmon (Salmo salar).BonesBoiled for 1 h with 1% of NaOH and pure water wasted; Calcination with 800 °C temperature for 180 min.Preparation of calcium phosphate bioceramics for bone-substitute materials.[126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roy, V.C.; Islam, M.R.; Sadia, S.; Yeasmin, M.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, H.-J.; Chun, B.-S. Trash to Treasure: An Up-to-Date Understanding of the Valorization of Seafood By-Products, Targeting the Major Bioactive Compounds. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090485

AMA Style

Roy VC, Islam MR, Sadia S, Yeasmin M, Park J-S, Lee H-J, Chun B-S. Trash to Treasure: An Up-to-Date Understanding of the Valorization of Seafood By-Products, Targeting the Major Bioactive Compounds. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(9):485. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roy, Vikash Chandra, Md. Rakibul Islam, Sultana Sadia, Momota Yeasmin, Jin-Seok Park, Hee-Jeong Lee, and Byung-Soo Chun. 2023. "Trash to Treasure: An Up-to-Date Understanding of the Valorization of Seafood By-Products, Targeting the Major Bioactive Compounds" Marine Drugs 21, no. 9: 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090485

APA Style

Roy, V. C., Islam, M. R., Sadia, S., Yeasmin, M., Park, J. -S., Lee, H. -J., & Chun, B. -S. (2023). Trash to Treasure: An Up-to-Date Understanding of the Valorization of Seafood By-Products, Targeting the Major Bioactive Compounds. Marine Drugs, 21(9), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090485

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop