Next Article in Journal
Achieving Smoke-Free Mental Health Services: Lessons from the Past Decade of Implementation Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Exposure of Horses to Mosquito-Borne Flaviviruses in South-East Queensland, Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Gold Standard Program for Heavy Smokers in a Real-Life Setting
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Australian Mosquito Species in the Transmission of Endemic and Exotic West Nile Virus Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph10094200
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Vaccine Approaches for West Nile Virus

by
Arun V. Iyer
*,† and
Konstantin G. Kousoulas
*
Division of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Skip Bertman Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current Address: Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Suite 1000, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10(9), 4200-4223; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094200
Submission received: 8 July 2013 / Revised: 2 September 2013 / Accepted: 5 September 2013 / Published: 10 September 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology of West Nile Virus)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The West Nile virus (WNC) first appeared in North America in 1999. The North American lineages of WNV were characterized by the presence of neuroinvasive and neurovirulent strains causing disease and death in humans, birds and horses. The 2012 WNV season in the United States saw a massive spike in the number of neuroinvasive cases and deaths similar to what was seen in the 2002–2003 season, according to the West Nile virus disease cases and deaths reported to the CDC by year and clinical presentation, 1999–2012, by ArboNET (Arboviral Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). In addition, the establishment and recent spread of lineage II WNV virus strains into Western Europe and the presence of neurovirulent and neuroinvasive strains among them is a cause of major concern. This review discusses the advances in the development of vaccines and biologicals to combat human and veterinary West Nile disease.

1. Introduction

West Nile virus (WNV) belongs to the flavivirus genus in the family Flaviviridae and was first isolated in 1937 from a febrile patient in the West Nile province of Uganda [1]. WNV has an approximately 11 kb single-stranded positive (+) sense RNA genome. The virions are icosahederal particles about 500 Å in diameter and have 180 molecules of pre-membrane/membrane (preM/M) and 180 molecules of envelope (E) glycoprotein on its surface [2]. The genome is translated as a single polyprotein, which is subsequently cleaved by host and viral proteases producing three structural and seven nonstructural proteins [3,4]. The structural proteins include a capsid (C) protein, a premembrane (prM) protein, and an envelope (E) glycoprotein that mediates attachment, virus-induced membrane fusion and virion assembly [5,6]. PreM (26 kD) is one of the two glycoproteins expressed on the viral surface and plays a critical role in E glycoprotein folding and chaperoning [7,8]. The PreM also functions in protecting the E glycoprotein from the intracellular acidic environment, which can cause structural rearrangement to a fusogenic form, as the heterodimeric preM/E complex passes through the secretory pathway. The WNV E glycoprotein is an approximately 53 kD type I membrane glycoprotein and has 12 conserved cysteine residues [9]. The E glycoprotein has three domains (DI-DIII). DI is the central structural domain while DII is the dimerization domain. The DII domain is made up of a 12 amino acid (aa) long fusion loop, which is necessary for virus-cell membrane fusion and for receptor binding [10]. The DIII domain spans amino acids 296–415 and functions in receptor recognition and binding [11,12,13,14,15].
More importantly, from a vaccinologists’ perspective, a majority of the neutralizing epitopes has been mapped to DIII [11,16,17,18,19,20]. The residues most consistently identified as neutralization epitopes on DIII are amino acids 302–309, 330–333, 333–365 and 389–391 [18]. Co-crystallization studies of DIII with monoclonal antibody mAbE16 revealed that these regions mapped to adjacent Ig-like loops forming a discontinuous epitope [17]. Potent monoclonal antibodies can block WNV infection even at low occupancies by binding to as few as 30 of the 180 envelope proteins on the virion [21].
Phylogenetic data of WNV reveals at least two distinct lineages [22,23,24,25]. Strains from North America, Europe, Middle East, Australia and India belong to lineage I. The Indian, Australian (Kunjin), Czech (Rabensburg) and LEIV-Krnd88-190 virus (Russia) isolates form separate sub-lineages within lineage I [22,25,26,27,28]. The Rabensburg, Russian and Indian isolates have been classified as separate lineages viz. III, IV and V by some researchers [24,25,29,30], while the divergent Kunjin virus from Sarawak and the African Koutango virus have been classified as lineages VI and VIII [30], respectively. Lineage II WNV was mainly restricted to sub-Saharan Africa and the island of Madagascar until it established itself in Hungary in 2004 [29,31].
Following its initial isolation in 1937 in Uganda [1], WNV outbreaks were reported in Egypt and Israel (1951 and 1957), France (1962–1965), South Africa (1974), India (1980-1981) and the Ukraine (1985). Also, WNV outbreaks have occurred in the recent past in Algeria (1994), Romania (1996), Morocco (1996 and 2003), Tunisia (1997 and 2003), Italy (1998), Czech Republic (1997), Israel (1997, 2000 and 2003), Russia (1999–2001), and France (2000, 2003–2004) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].
WNV was not considered a major risk for humans until the 1996 outbreak in Romania. However, WNV subsequently became a major veterinary and public health concern in Europe and United States. The first cases of West Nile (WN) infections in the United States were reported in Flushing , NY in 1999 [47]. The more recent outbreaks include the 2008–2009 season in Italy [48] resulting in 17 cases of WN neuroinvasive disease, the 2010 outbreak in Greece [49] with a whopping 17% mortality rate and the 2011 Kunjin virus outbreak among horses in Australia [50].
Since its emergence in Hungary in 2004 [29,31], the lineage II viruses have recently appeared in other non-traditional geographical zones. Retrospective studies have shown that that the lineage 2 WNV circulated among birds in Austria in 2008/2009 [51]. The Lineage II WNV has also been responsible for major outbreaks in Russia [52], Italy [53] and Greece [54]. Complicating matters further, highly neuroinvasive lineage II viruses have been isolated and have been shown to co-circulate along with lineage I viruses [55]. A fatal lineage II WNV case of an elderly Belgian national returning from Greece was recently described highlighting travel-associated transmission [56]. Weather patterns, virus adaptation to local vectors along with natural bird-migration related transmission of the virus could aid the successful establishment of the virus in Europe. It is now evident that neuroinvasive and neuropathogenic strains of WNV exist among both the lineage I and II WNV and their emergence, transposition and adaptation to new locales pose significant threats to humans, horses and birds.

2. WNV in Mosquitoes, Birds and Horses

WNV is primarily transmitted in nature by Culex mosquitoes. However, the virus has been isolated from more than 60 species of mosquitoes, [57,58] as well as from ticks [59,60]. Mosquito saliva is known to greatly enhance the success of virus infection by temporarily suppressing the host immune system in multiple ways [61]. A study comparing four species of mosquitoes showed that each mosquito was able to inject a mean dose of 103.6–5.9 Plaque Forming Units (PFU) of WNV per bite [62]. Additionally, approximately 102 PFU of WNV was shown to be injected extravascularly [62]. Mosquitoes become infected with WNV as they imbibe a blood meal from a viremic host. They can also infect each other as they simultaneously feed on the same host [63]. The virus infects the gut epithelium cells of the mosquitoes and as viral titers increase, they enter the hemocoel, spread to surrounding tissues, and finally invade the salivary glands and brain of the mosquito vector [64,65]. When the infected mosquito bites a vertebrate, WNV is transmitted intradermally. The virus infects and replicates in the Langerhans cells of the host. As the Langerhans cells migrate to the lymph nodes, a second round of replication takes place in the lymph nodes before the onset of viremia [66].
Birds are amplifiers of the disease. The North American strain of WNV is characterized by its ability to cause fatal neurological disease among many different species of birds. WNV has been isolated from at least 300 species of birds and has been shown to cause specific pathological changes in many tissues of at least 14 different species [45,64,67]. Thus, birds are the most important link in WNV maintenance and transmission. American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) can also become infected with WNV and transmit WNV to mosquitoes [68,69]. Additionally, WNV has been isolated from a number of non-avian vertebrate hosts including, but not limited to equine, feline and canine hosts in addition to bats [64,70]. Like birds, horses play an import indicator role in WNV outbreaks but are dead-end hosts. They become viremic but the viremia is not high enough for horses to serve as an amplifying host [71]. In the 1999 outbreak, 36% of the infected horses either died of WN or were euthanized [72]. Other studies reported a 22–28% mortality rate in horses [73,74]. Lineage II WN viruses were associated with a 70% (five out of seven animals) mortality rate in horses in South Africa [75]. The common clinical symptoms in horses include weakness, incoordination and ataxia [76].

3. Human West Nile Disease

WNV is a Category B National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Priority Pathogen [77]. It has also been a nationally notifiable disease since 2005 [78].
Humans are dead-end hosts for WNV as the virus does not achieve sufficiently high enough titers to be transmitted to mosquitoes. WNV has also been reported to be transmitted to humans through non-vector mediated routes. WNV can be transmitted from mother to child by the intrauterine route [79], through breast milk [80,81] and blood transfusion [82,83,84]. Additionally, the virus can be transmitted via bone marrow transplant [85], organ transplantation [86,87] and through dialysis [88,89]. Laboratory acquired infections have also been reported [90,91].
The incubation period for human WNV disease is between 2–14 days [92]. Approximately 80% of patients infected with WNV are asymptomatic and 20% of the patients suffer from West Nile Fever (WNF); a condition that is characterized by fever and headache [92,93,94]. Additionally, some patients may also exhibit a variety of signs and symptoms including muscle weakness, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal problems, lymphadenopathy and non-pruritic maculopapular skin rash [65,95,96]. Non-neurological clinical manifestations of WNF include rhabdomyolysis [97,98], pancreatitis [99], hepatitis [100], myosistis, orchitis [101], chorioretinitis [102] and cardiac dysrythmias [103].
Less than 1% of the WNV patients suffer from a West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease (WND) including West Nile meningitis (WNM), encephalitis (WNE) and acute flaccid paralysis (a poliomyelitis-like syndrome) (WNP) [93,103,104]. The differences in symptoms of WNF and WND are often difficult to distinguish. WNM is believed to occur in approximately 40% of the cases of WND. Symptoms of meningeal irritation including fever, headache, nuchal rigidity, photophobia, and phonophobia have been observed in these patients. Some of the patients also exhibit Kernig’s and Brudzinski’s signs [105]. Pleocytosis of <500/mm3 is often observed [106]. The prognosis for recovering from WNF and WNM is generally favorable with occasional complaints of weakness and issues relating to memory and concentration on follow-up examination [107].
A second aspect of WND is WNE. The severity of WNE can range from mild encephalitic disease to a more severe from characterized by coma and death and the risk of developing WNE increases with age [108]. Patients with WNE exhibit depression, altered level of consciousness or confusion and personality changes [104,109]. Additional symptoms include ataxia, lethargy, movement disorders, Parkinsonism, conjunctivitis, confusion, photophobia, slurred speech, seizures, tremors and involuntary body movements [65,66,103,104,110,111]. Prognosis for WNE patients is not as good as those for WNM with some patients suffering from functional and cognitive problems [107]. Interestingly, WNE was first reported in the United States in 1952 in New York when the Egyptian strain of WNV was used in treatment of cancer. Encephalitis was observed in 9.47% (nine out of 95) of these patients [112].
West Nile poliomyelitis (WNP) is the third aspect of WND and is the result of WNV infecting the motor neurons. This results in asymmetric acute flaccid paralysis of one or more limbs [97,106,113,114]. Some patients may have to be put on mechanical ventilation and intubation as the diaphragmatic and intercostal muscle may be paralyzed causing respiratory failure [103,114,115]. Areflexia or hyporeflexia, loss of bowel and bladder control are also common [103]. A Guillain-Barré-like syndrome affecting peripheral nerves, radiculopathy and demylenating peripheral neuropthay have also been reported although true Guillain-Barré syndrome is rare [106,115,116,117]. Recovery was found to be variable and in general, the initial severity of the disease did not forebode a poor prognosis [106,118].
Among WND human cases, an estimated 55–60% patients suffer from WNE with an estimated 20% case fatality. Additionally, WNP may contribute to 10–50% case mortality in humans [104]. The most common victims of WNV are the very young, the elderly and those with suppressed or compromised immune systems.

4. Advances in Vaccine Approaches against West Nile Virus

WNV was first isolated more than seventy years ago [1]. It was not considered to be a worrisome flavivirus until it invaded North America causing disease with neurological implications. Currently, there are no commercially available vaccines for human use. Several vaccines and biologicals for human use have been evaluated in Phase I and Phase II clinical trials in the US [119]. A major reason for not developing a human WNV vaccine is probably the lack of substantial commercial interest. There is a very small and practically economically insignificant market for a human vaccine. The prohibitively high cost-to-benefit ratio for development and marketing is the primary cause for preventing its development and commercialization [120]. In this context, Crucell Inc. launched an initiative to develop a WNV vaccine for human use, but later discontinued its efforts [121].
In contrast to the lack of WNV vaccines for humans, a number of experimental vaccines have been successfully developed and tested, and several vaccines have been licensed for veterinary use. A wide number of vaccine approaches have been tested in mice, hamsters, birds, horses and non-human primates. Some human vaccine candidates have been evaluated in phase I and II clinical trials.

4.1. Inactivated Vaccines

A formalin-inactivated whole-virus veterinary vaccine originally developed by Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA, USA was licensed in 2003 (marketed by Pfizer under the brand name West Nile Innovator®). This vaccine was shown to be safe and efficacious in horses and was granted full license by the USDA [122]. In small animal experiments, golden hamsters vaccinated with the Fort Dodge vaccine were completely protected against challenge. Almost 89% of the vaccinated animals showed hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and complement fixing (CF) antibodies while 55.5% animals showed low levels of WN neutralizing antibodies [123]. The vaccine, however, could not efficiently elicit neutralizing antibodies in flamingos and red-tailed hawks [124]. The Innovator® vaccine was also tested in the baboon model for WN. Vaccinated baboons showed increased IgG and IgM response and high PRNT titers [125]. The animals exhibited very low viremia on challenge with WNV-OK2 strain.
An inactivated equine WNV vaccine was tested on horses in 2003 [122]. On challenge, 81.8% of the control horses had viremia as compared to 19% of the vaccinated horses. An experimental vaccine using formalin inactivated WNV passaged in sucking mouse brains was evaluated in young geese. Eighty-five percent of the birds were protected upon intra-cranial challenge with WNV. Extensive field studies showed the vaccine was safe and efficacious [126]. The same research group also developed an inactivated vaccine using the PER.C6 cell platform. They showed that 91.4% of the vaccinated geese were protected following severe intracranial challenge [127]. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica markets a USDA licensed killed virus vaccine under the trade name VeteraTM WNV. Recently, Diamond et al. showed that young and aged mice vaccinated and boosted with 3% hydrogen peroxide inactivated Kunjin WNV elicited a 90–100% protective immune response following lethal intracranial challenge [128].

4.2. Recombinant/Subunit Vaccines

The WNV envelope glycoprotein gene derived from a mosquito isolate was used to express the E glycoprotein. C3H/HeN mice vaccinated with the purified protein were shown to be protected on challenge [129]. In another experiment, soluble WNV E protein expressed in S2 cells was used to vaccinate mice and horses. All vaccinated mice survived challenge and both the mice and the horses developed high titer WN antibodies [130]. Watts et al. [131] immunized hamsters with a carboxy terminus-truncated WNV E protein in combination with or in absence of the WNV non-structural protein 1 (NS1). Animals in the NS1-only group showed an 87% survival rate, whereas animals vaccinated with NS1 and E or just E alone showed a 100% survival rate on challenge. In a follow-up study by the same research group, the authors reported robust cellular immune responses in vaccinated hamsters [132].
Domain III (D III) of the flavivirus envelope gene is highly immunogenic. Researchers have successfully made subunit vaccines for Dengue [133] and Japanese encephalitis [134] using the D III region. In 2007 Chu et al. [20] evaluated a WNV DIII based vaccine for WNV and showed that it elicited a strong Th1 response with production of IL-2 and IFN-γ. McDonald et al. generated a WNV EIII domain-bacterial flagellin (STF2∆) fusion protein [135]. This vaccine was able to stimulate both innate and adaptive immune responses and protected mice against challenge. A subunit vaccine expressing the D III of WNV E gene was evaluated in mice [136]. All vaccinated mice survived challenge as compared to an 80% survival rate observed in a β-propiolactone inactivated whole virus vaccine group.
Recently, our group at Louisiana State University constructed a subunit vaccine by fusing the DIII domain of the highly neuroinvasive WNV LSU-AR01 [137] to equine CD40L. Our data showed that the vaccine induced strong neutralizing antibody responses in horses as measured by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) after a single vaccination. A booster shot enhanced the antibody response. The vaccine was safe with no injection site reactions [138].

4.3. Nucleic Acid/DNA Vaccines

A DNA vaccine expressing the WNV NY99 capsid gene was constructed and tested in mice [139]. This vaccine was shown to elicit a strong Th1 immune response with a robust peak in IL-2 and IFN-γ levels. Davis et al. [140] engineered a DNA vaccine (pCBWN) expressing WNV preM and E proteins. The vaccine protected 100% of the mice and generated robust neutralizing antibody response in horses on challenge. The pCBWN vaccine was also shown to protect American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and fish crows (Corvus ossifragus) in a route dependent manner [141,142]. A plasmid DNA encoding the infectious full-length RNA genome of Kunjin virus was used to vaccinate mice. A single mutation in the NS1 gene of the Kunjin virus attenuated it in sucking mice. The vaccine was shown to protect against intracerebral and intraperitoneal challenge with both WNV NY99 and the Kunjin virus [143]. Phase I clinical trials for a DNA vaccine expressing WNV NY99 preM and E genes were conducted in 2007 [144]. This vaccine was found to be safe and well-tolerated and elicited strong humoral and T cell response. A very similar vaccine with a modified CMV/R promoter was recently evaluated in a Phase I clinical trial. This vaccine was shown to be safe and elicited neutralizing antibody response even in older individuals [145].
More recently, a capsid deleted Kunjin virus DNA vaccine was developed with the capsid being provided in trans. These single-cycle viruses replicate once to generate VLPs, which were highly immunogenic in mice and horses [146]. The WNV innovator-DNA developed by Fort Dodge Animal Health became the first DNA vaccine licensed by the USDA for use in horses in 2005, but was later removed from the market [57]. This vaccine was also shown to be one of the two best vaccine options in protecting scrub jays (Aphelocoma sp.) [147].

4.4. Recombinant Virus Vaccines

The recombinant live canarypox vectored vaccine by Merial (Sanofi) was licensed in 2004 for veterinary use. This vaccine marketed under the brand name RecombiTEK has a canapox/ALVAC viral vector backbone expressing WNV preM and E proteins. The RecombiTEK vaccine was shown to elicit a strong anamnestic immune response in horses that were previously vaccinated with the Fort Dodge Innovator® vaccine [148]. A single dose of the vaccine afforded early protection against viremia in horses challenged with WNV infected mosquitoes [149]. When vaccinated with two doses and subjected to a mosquito challenge, all vaccinated horses developed high titer neutralizing antibody response and did not show any clinical signs of illness [150]. The RecombiTEK vaccine has also been proven to be effective in cats [151]. In a separate set of experiments, ten control and ten RecombiTEK vaccinated horses were challenged by the intrathecal route and was shown to be protective considering the challenge route [152]. More significantly, this vaccine was recently shown to protect horses from neurovirulent lineage 2 WNV [31].
A lentivirus vector based vaccine (TRIP/sEWNV) was tested in mice. A single dose of this vaccine protected against lethal challenge with WNV IS-98-ST1 strain. This protection was seen as early as seven days post vaccination and also provided long lasting immunity [153].
A live measles virus vaccine expressing secreted envelope glycoprotein of the IS-98-ST1 strain of WNV was constructed using the attenuated Schwarz strain of measles virus. This vaccine (MVSchw-sEWNV) protected mice against lethal challenge with WNV [154]. Recombinant equine herpes virus-1 (EHV-1) vectored vaccines expressing WNV PrM and E proteins was shown to elicit neutralizing antibody response in horses as measured plaque reduction neutralization test [155].
We constructed and tested in mice recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) vectored vaccines against WNV using a prime-boost approach. The envelope glycoprotein from the highly neurovirulent LSU-AR01 [137] strain was cloned into recombinant VSV that expressed either VSV Indiana G glycoprotein (priming vaccine) or Chandipura virus G glycoprotein (boosting vaccine). The vaccine protected 90% of the vaccinated mice against severe lethal challenge with LSU-AR01 virus. In addition, the vaccine elicited robust WNV E glycoprotein specific cellular immune response including upregulation of antigen specific CD4+CD154+IFNγ+ T cells and CD8+CD62Llow IFNγ+ T cells [156].

4.5. ChimeriVax Technology Based Vaccines

To obtain license for a commercial West Nile vaccine for human use, the vaccine must demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical trials. Importantly, the vaccine must be able to elicit potent protective immune responses. The ChimeriVax vaccine in many ways exploits the clinical data that exists for its parent vaccine the Yellow fever 17D vaccine. The vaccine virus, known as the Asibi strain, was isolated from a patient named Asibi in Ghana in 1927 [157,158]. In 1930, Max Theiler developed the first attenuated strain of this virus which he called the 17D virus [157]. The vaccine has demonstrated a very good safety record of millions of doses over the years [120,159]. The ChimeriVax vaccines largely rely on their comparative safety against this vaccine. The ChimeriVax vaccines have a vector backbone consisting of the 17D non-structural genes. The preM and E genes of the candidate flavivirus is incorporated into this backbone generating a recombinant virus expressing the antigens of interest in a 17D background.
The first chimeras contained the Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus preM and E [160], were shown to be genetically stable and conferred strong protection against virulent JE virus challenge [161]. The ChimeriVaxTM-JE virus did not infect Aedes or Culex mosquitoes [162]. This vaccine has been extensively tested and characterized in mice [161] and Rhesus macaques [163,164]. ChimeriVaxTM-JE has been studied in humans and a Phase II clinical trial its potential effectiveness as a human vaccine [165,166]. Pugachev et al. [167] have published a detailed review on these vaccines. Similar vaccines have also been generated and tested for all four Dengue virus serotypes [168,169,170,171,172,173]. The ChimeriVaxTM-Dengue vaccine was evaluated in Phase II clinical trials [174].
Studies in the hamster model showed that the ChimeriVaxTM-WNV protected hamsters and induced a strong immune response as measured by HI, CF and the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) [123]. Preclinical studies were also carried out in mice and Rhesus macaques. ICR mice that were vaccinated and challenged intraperitoneally were protected in a vaccine dose-dependent manner. Similarly, ChimeriVaxTM-WNV vaccinated macaques were uniformly protected against intracerebral challenge [175]. About 50% of these animals suffered from subclinical disease post challenge and this is attributed to the aggressive route of challenge. In a second set of pre-clinical studies, the ChimeriVax-WNV02 vaccine, which has multiple point mutations, was tested in rhesus macaques. The skin and lymphoid tissues were prominent sites for viral replication. Additionally, studies on human subjects revealed that the vaccine produced high titer neutralizing antibody response and antigen specific CD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ [176]. WNV specific CD4+ T cells were detected in >80% of the subjects. In Phase II clinical trials, the ChimeriVax-WNV vaccine was evaluated in studies based on age and dose. The vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in younger adults (18–40 years), patients 50 years of age or older and in patients over 65 years of age [177,178].
An equine WNV vaccine based on the ChimeriVax technology was licensed by the USDA in 2006 and marketed by Intervet under the brand name Prevenile. This vaccine encoded the WNV NY 99 pre-membrane and envelope genes on a YFV backbone, but was recalled in 2010 due to acute side effects including fatality among vaccinated horses [179].

4.6. Virus-Like Particles (VLP) and Heterologous Vaccines

A number of other approaches have been used to produce effective WN vaccines. Qiao et al. [180] generated WN virus-like particles (WNVLPs) using recombinant baculovirus expressing a combination of preM and E genes or capsid, preM and E genes. WNVLPs expressing preM and E generated a strong, protective and sterilizing immunity in mice on challenge. However, when the capsid protein was included to generate WNVLPs, a much weaker immune response was observed.
Heterologous vaccine approaches have been used to develop WNV vaccines based on cross protection afforded by closely related flaviviruses. An example of this approach is the use of the Israel turkey meningoencephalitis virus (ITMV). ITMV is an arbovirus belonging to Ntaya serogroup of flaviviruses and was first described in 1960 [181]. It was found that turkeys less than ten weeks seldom showed any incidence of WNV probably due to presence of cross reacting antibodies. Geese vaccinated with formalin inactivated ITMV vaccine exhibited 39–72% survival on intracranial challenge with WNV [182]. In 1971, Price and Thind [183] demonstrated that hamsters vaccinated with any of four Dengue virus serotypes were protected against a WNV challenge. Hamsters vaccinated with Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine (JEV SA14-2-8), wild-type St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), or Yellow fever virus vaccine (YFV 17D), showed some level of protection against WNV. Animals vaccinated with the JEV SA14-2-8 and the SLEV vaccine were protected against WNV encephalitis and death [184]. American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchus) vaccinated with wild-type Kunijin virus were completely protected against WNV challenge [185] (the Kunjin viruses are now classified as lineage(s) of WNV).
Despite the encouraging results with cross-protection through the use of heterologous flavivirus vaccines, it is known that humans vaccinated with the JE vaccine (JE-VAX, BIKEN, Japan) or with Dengue vaccine (Aventis Pasteur, Lyon, France) do not show protective neutralizing antibodies against WNV [186]. Similar observations were made by Takasaki et al. [187] revealing that mice vaccinated with mouse brain-derived JE vaccine were not protected against intracranial challenge with WNV. However, at higher vaccine doses, animals were partially protected when challenged through intraperitoneal route. Interestingly, mice vaccinated against WNV elicited partial protective response against JEV [136].

4.7. Passive Antibody Prophylaxis

Hyperimmune sera have been used for passive antibody prophylaxis for many diseases including West Nile. Pooled sera from mice that were actively immunized with WNV E protein was diluted 1:5 and administered to naïve mice. These mice were challenged with 101–106 PFU WNV after 24 h of passive immunization. Four out of five control mice and one out of five vaccinated mice died over a 15 day observation period [129]. In one study immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice were administered polyclonal WN antibodies prior to infection with the virus. The antibody prevented morbidity in wild-type mice but the immunocompromised mice eventually succumbed at later time points [188]. Passively administered sera from immunized horses has been shown to protect naïve mice on challenge with WNV [130]. Similarly, affinity purified horse antibodies against three WNV envelope peptides protected 48–59% mice when challenged with WNV [189].
Passive antibody prophylaxis has been used with a fair amount of success in humans. Shimoni et al. [190] described a case of a 70 year old Israeli woman who went into deep coma in 72 h after admission. She was intravenously administered Omr-IgG-am antibodies (Omrix Biopharmaceutical Ltd, Kiryat-Ono, Israel) at 0.4g/Kg. The patients’ level of consciousness dramatically improved over the next week. In 2002, a 42 year old Israeli male lung transplant recipient with confirmed WNE exhibited deteriorating level of consciousness. Within 48 h of being intravenously administered Omr-IgG-am antibodies [191], the patient showed dramatic improvement. Passive antibody therapy, however, failed to protect a 55 year old man suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukemia, hypogammaglobulinemia and WNV infection. The patient was administered the Omr-IgG-am antibodies at 0.5 g/kg. Unfortunately, possibly because of the timing of administration and/or the underlying conditions, the patient succumbed thirty-two days into his illness [192].

4.8. Live-Attenuated Virus Vaccines

A live attenuated vaccine was generated by serially passaging the Israeli strain of WNV in a mosquito cell line and selecting an escape mutant using monoclonal antibodies [193]. The resulting virus, WN-25A lost all neuroinvasivenes, while it protected mice and geese upon lethal challenge. A couple of WNV and Dengue virus type 4 chimeras were constructed and evaluated as vaccines for WNV. In one chimera, the WNV membrane precursor and envelope were cloned on a Dengue 4 (WN/DEN4) background and the other had a 30 nucleotide deletion in the 3′ non-coding region of DEN4 (WN/DEN4-3′∆30). Both these vaccines were attenuated in Rhesus macaques and prevented viremia in the macaques upon challenge [194]. A follow-up study with the WN/DEN4-3′∆30 virus showed that it was unable to infect geese, and that it was safe in immunocompomised mice and attenuated in monkeys [195]. A similar study using a chimeric Dengue 2 virus construct expressing the WNV NY99 preM and E glycoprotein protected mice on challenge with the NY99 strain of WNV [196]. In another study, a molecularly cloned descendant of the lineage II prototype B956 was generated. This virus (WN1415), was shown to elicit a potent immune response and protect 100% of the mice on challenge, while at a lower vaccine dose (55 PFU), 67% of the mice were protected [197].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a number of vaccine strategies have been explored and showed promise to combat WNV. It is also evident that vaccines against lineage I WNV are able to protect against lineage II viruses and the converse is also true. In this regard, Kunjin virus-based vaccines are able to protect against lineage I viruses. A number of successful, licensed veterinary vaccines against WNV are readily available and several promising human WNV vaccine candidates have undergone successful early phase clinical trials. The spread of neurovirulent and neuroinvasive lineage II WNV through Europe is reminiscent of the invasion and spread of lineage I WNV through the North American continent. Licensed vaccines for human use are needed to combat WNV lineage I and potential lineage II world-wide infections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smithburn, K.C.; Hughes, T.P.; Burke, A.W.; Paul, J.H. A neurotropic virus isolated from the blood of a native of Uganda. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1940, 20, 471–492. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lindenbach, B.D.; Thiel, H.-J.; Rice, C.M. Flaviviridae: The viruses and their replication. In Fields’ Virology, 5th ed.; Fields, B.N., Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 1101–1152. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinton, M.A. The molecular biology of West Nile virus: A new invader of the western hemisphere. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 371–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chambers, T.J.; Hahn, C.S.; Galler, R.; Rice, C.M. Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1990, 44, 649–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Kim, B.S.; Chipman, P.R.; Rossmann, M.G.; Kuhn, R.J. Structure of West Nile virus. Science 2003, 302, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Kuhn, R.J.; Rossmann, M.G. A structural perspective of the flavivirus life cycle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Konishi, E.; Mason, P.W. Proper maturation of the Japanese encephalitis virus envelope glycoprotein requires cosynthesis with the premembrane protein. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 1672–1675. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lorenz, I.C.; Allison, S.L.; Heinz, F.X.; Helenius, A. Folding and dimerization of tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope proteins prM and E in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 5480–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nowak, T.; Wengler, G. Analysis of disulfides present in the membrane proteins of the West Nile flavivirus. Virology 1987, 156, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pokidysheva, E.; Zhang, Y.; Battisti, A.J.; Bator-Kelly, C.M.; Chipman, P.R.; Xiao, C.; Gregorio, G.G.; Hendrickson, W.A.; Kuhn, R.J.; Rossmann, M.G. Cryo-EM reconstruction of dengue virus in complex with the carbohydrate recognition domain of DC-SIGN. Cell 2006, 124, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beasley, D.W.; Barrett, A.D. Identification of neutralizing epitopes within structural domain III of the West Nile virus envelope protein. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 13097–13100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anderson, R. Manipulation of cell surface macromolecules by flaviviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2003, 59, 229–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chu, J.J.; Rajamanonmani, R.; Li, J.; Bhuvanakantham, R.; Lescar, J.; Ng, M.L. Inhibition of West Nile virus entry by using a recombinant domain III from the envelope glycoprotein. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, J.W.; Chu, J.J.; Ng, M.L. Quantifying the specific binding between West Nile virus envelope domain III protein and the cellular receptor alphaVbeta3 integrin. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar]
  15. Volk, D.E.; Beasley, D.W.; Kallick, D.A.; Holbrook, M.R.; Barrett, A.D.; Gorenstein, D.G. Solution structure and antibody binding studies of the envelope protein domain III from the New York strain of West Nile virus. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 38755–38761. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, L.; Barrett, A.D.; Beasley, D.W. Differential expression of domain III neutralizing epitopes on the envelope proteins of West Nile Virus strains. Virology 2005, 335, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nybakken, G.E.; Oliphant, T.; Johnson, S.; Burke, S.; Diamond, M.S.; Fremont, D.H. Structural basis of West Nile virus neutralization by a therapeutic antibody. Nature 2005, 437, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oliphant, T.; Engle, M.; Nybakken, G.E.; Doane, C.; Johnson, S.; Huang, L.; Gorlatov, S.; Mehlhop, E.; Marri, A.; Chung, K.M.; et al. Development of a humanized monoclonal antibody with therapeutic potential against West Nile virus. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oliphant, T.; Diamond, M.S. The molecular basis of antibody-mediated neutralization of West Nile virus. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2007, 7, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chu, J.H.; Chiang, C.C.; Ng, M.L. Immunization of flavivirus West Nile recombinant envelope domain III protein induced specific immune response and protection against West Nile virus infection. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 2699–2705. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pierson, T.C.; Xu, Q.; Nelson, S.; Oliphant, T.; Nybakken, G.E.; Fremont, D.H.; Diamond, M.S. The stoichiometry of antibody-mediated neutralization and enhancement of West Nile virus infection. Cell. Host Microbe 2007, 1, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lanciotti, R.S.; Ebel, G.D.; Deubel, V.; Kerst, A.J.; Murri, S.; Meyer, R.; Bowen, M.; McKinney, N.; Morrill, W.E.; Crabtree, M.B.; et al. Complete genome sequences and phylogenetic analysis of West Nile virus strains isolated from the united states, europe, and the middle east. Virology 2002, 298, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lanciotti, R.S.; Roehrig, J.T.; Deubel, V.; Smith, J.; Parker, M.; Steele, K.; Crise, B.; Volpe, K.E.; Crabtree, M.B.; Scherret, J.H.; et al. Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science 1999, 286, 2333–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Briese, T.; Rambaut, A.; Pathmajeyan, M.; Bishara, J.; Weinberger, M.; Pitlik, S.; Lipkin, W.I. Phylogenetic analysis of a human isolate from the 2000 Israel West Nile virus epidemic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bondre, V.P.; Jadi, R.S.; Mishra, A.C.; Yergolkar, P.N.; Arankalle, V.A. West Nile virus isolates from India: Evidence for a distinct genetic lineage. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bakonyi, T.; Hubalek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Nowotny, N. Novel flavivirus or new lineage of West Nile virus, central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coia, G.; Parker, M.D.; Speight, G.; Byrne, M.E.; Westaway, E.G. Nucleotide and complete amino acid sequences of Kunjin virus: Definitive gene order and characteristics of the virus-specified proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 1988, 69 (Pt. 1), 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  28. Scherret, J.H.; Poidinger, M.; Mackenzie, J.S.; Broom, A.K.; Deubel, V.; Lipkin, W.I.; Briese, T.; Gould, E.A.; Hall, R.A. The relationships between West Nile and Kunjin viruses. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 697–705. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bakonyi, T.; Ivanics, E.; Erdelyi, K.; Ursu, K.; Ferenczi, E.; Weissenbock, H.; Nowotny, N. Lineage 1 and 2 strains of encephalitic West Nile virus, central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 618–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mackenzie, J.S.; Williams, D.T. The zoonotic flaviviruses of southern, south-eastern and eastern Asia, and Australasia: The potential for emergent viruses. Zoonoses Public Health 2009, 56, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Minke, J.M.; Siger, L.; Cupillard, L.; Powers, B.; Bakonyi, T.; Boyum, S.; Nowotny, N.; Bowen, R. Protection provided by a recombinant alvac((r))-WNV vaccine expressing the prM/E genes of a lineage 1 strain of WNV against a virulent challenge with a lineage 2 strain. Vaccine 2011, 29, 4608–4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsai, T.F.; Popovici, F.; Cernescu, C.; Campbell, G.L.; Nedelcu, N.I. West Nile encephalitis epidemic in southeastern Romania. Lancet 1998, 352, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chowers, M.Y.; Lang, R.; Nassar, F.; Ben-David, D.; Giladi, M.; Rubinshtein, E.; Itzhaki, A.; Mishal, J.; Siegman-Igra, Y.; Kitzes, R.; et al. Clinical characteristics of the West Nile fever outbreak, Israel, 2000. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 675–678. [Google Scholar]
  34. Platonov, A.E.; Shipulin, G.A.; Shipulina, O.Y.; Tyutyunnik, E.N.; Frolochkina, T.I.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Yazyshina, S.; Platonova, O.V.; Obukhov, I.L.; Zhukov, A.N.; et al. Outbreak of West Nile virus infection, Volgograd region, Russia, 1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bernkopf, H.; Levine, S.; Nerson, R. Isolation of West Nile virus in Israel. J. Infect. Dis. 1953, 93, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Joubert, L.; Oudar, J.; Hannoun, C.; Beytout, D.; Corniou, B.; Guillon, J.C.; Panthier, R. Epidemiology of the West Nile virus: Study of a focus in Camargue. IV. Meningo-encephalomyelitis of the horse. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 1970, 118, 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  37. George, S.; Gourie-Devi, M.; Rao, J.A.; Prasad, S.R.; Pavri, K.M. Isolation of West Nile virus from the brains of children who had died of encephalitis. Bull. WHO 1984, 62, 879–882. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hubalek, Z.; Halouzka, J. West Nile fever—A reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999, 5, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Murgue, B.; Murri, S.; Triki, H.; Deubel, V.; Zeller, H.G. West Nile in the Mediterranean basin: 1950–2000. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  40. Murgue, B.; Zeller, H.; Deubel, V. The ecology and epidemiology of West Nile virus in Africa, Europe and Asia. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2002, 267, 195–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dauphin, G.; Zientara, S.; Zeller, H.; Murgue, B. West Nile: Worldwide current situation in animals and humans. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 27, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schuffenecker, I.; Peyrefitte, C.N.; el Harrak, M.; Murri, S.; Leblond, A.; Zeller, H.G. West Nile virus in Morocco, 2003. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zeller, H.G.; Schuffenecker, I. West Nile virus: An overview of its spread in europe and the mediterranean basin in contrast to its spread in the Americas. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 23, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gerhardt, R. West Nile virus in the United States (1999–2005). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2006, 42, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hayes, E.B.; Komar, N.; Nasci, R.S.; Montgomery, S.P.; O'Leary, D.R.; Campbell, G.L. Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of West Nile virus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hayes, C.G. West Nile virus: Uganda, 1937, to New York City, 1999. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Asnis, D.S.; Conetta, R.; Teixeira, A.A.; Waldman, G.; Sampson, B.A. The West Nile virus outbreak of 1999 in New York: The flushing hospital experience. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rossini, G.; Carletti, F.; Bordi, L.; Cavrini, F.; Gaibani, P.; Landini, M.P.; Pierro, A.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Di Caro, A.; Sambri, V. Phylogenetic analysis of West Nile virus isolates, Italy, 2008–2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 903–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Danis, K.; Papa, A.; Theocharopoulos, G.; Dougas, G.; Athanasiou, M.; Detsis, M.; Baka, A.; Lytras, T.; Mellou, K.; Bonovas, S.; et al. Outbreak of West Nile virus infection in Greece, 2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1868–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Frost, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Edmonds, J.H.; Prow, N.A.; Gu, X.; Davis, R.; Hornitzky, C.; Arzey, K.E.; Finlaison, D.; Hick, P.; et al. Characterization of virulent West Nile virus Kunjin strain, Australia, 2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 792–800. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wodak, E.; Richter, S.; Bago, Z.; Revilla-Fernandez, S.; Weissenbock, H.; Nowotny, N.; Winter, P. Detection and molecular analysis of West Nile virus infections in birds of prey in the eastern part of Austria in 2008 and 2009. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 149, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Platonov, A.E.; Fedorova, M.V.; Karan, L.S.; Shopenskaya, T.A.; Platonova, O.V.; Zhuravlev, V.I. Epidemiology of West Nile infection in Volgograd, Russia, in relation to climate change and mosquito (diptera: Culicidae) bionomics. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103 (Suppl 1), S45–S53. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bagnarelli, P.; Marinelli, K.; Trotta, D.; Monachetti, A.; Tavio, M.; Del Gobbo, R.; Capobianchi, M.; Menzo, S.; Nicoletti, L.; Magurano, F.; et al. Human case of autochthonous West Nile virus lineage 2 infection in Italy, September 2011. Euro Surveill 2011, 16. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20002 (accessed on 6 Septembr 2013). [Google Scholar]
  54. Papa, A.; Xanthopoulou, K.; Gewehr, S.; Mourelatos, S. Detection of West Nile virus lineage 2 in mosquitoes during a human outbreak in Greece. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1176–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Magurano, F.; Remoli, M.E.; Baggieri, M.; Fortuna, C.; Marchi, A.; Fiorentini, C.; Bucci, P.; Benedetti, E.; Ciufolini, M.G.; Rizzo, C.; et al. Circulation of West Nile virus lineage 1 and 2 during an outbreak in Italy. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, E545–E547. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cnops, L.; Papa, A.; Lagra, F.; Weyers, P.; Meersman, K.; Patsouros, N.; Van Esbroeck, M. West Nile virus infection in belgian traveler returning from Greece. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 684–685. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dauphin, G.; Zientara, S. West Nile virus: Recent trends in diagnosis and vaccine development. Vaccine 2007, 25, 5563–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gubler, D.J. The continuing spread of West Nile virus in the western hemisphere. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lawrie, C.H.; Uzcategui, N.Y.; Gould, E.A.; Nuttall, P.A. Ixodid and argasid tick species and West Nile virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Formosinho, P.; Santos-Silva, M.M. Experimental infection of hyalomma marginatum ticks with West Nile virus. Acta Virol. 2006, 50, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  61. Titus, R.G.; Bishop, J.V.; Mejia, J.S. The immunomodulatory factors of arthropod saliva and the potential for these factors to serve as vaccine targets to prevent pathogen transmission. Parasite Immunol. 2006, 28, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  62. Styer, L.M.; Kent, K.A.; Albright, R.G.; Bennett, C.J.; Kramer, L.D.; Bernard, K.A. Mosquitoes inoculate high doses of West Nile virus as they probe and feed on live hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar]
  63. Higgs, S.; Schneider, B.S.; Vanlandingham, D.L.; Klingler, K.A.; Gould, E.A. Nonviremic transmission of West Nile virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8871–8874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fields, B.N.; Knipe, D.M.; Howley, P.M. Fields’ Virology, 5th ed.; Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  65. Davis, L.E.; DeBiasi, R.; Goade, D.E.; Haaland, K.Y.; Harrington, J.A.; Harnar, J.B.; Pergam, S.A.; King, M.K.; DeMasters, B.K.; Tyler, K.L. West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease. Ann. Neurol. 2006, 60, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Drebot, M.A.; Artsob, H. West Nile virus. Update for family physicians. Can. Fam. Physician 2005, 51, 1094–1099. [Google Scholar]
  67. Steele, K.E.; Linn, M.J.; Schoepp, R.J.; Komar, N.; Geisbert, T.W.; Manduca, R.M.; Calle, P.P.; Raphael, B.L.; Clippinger, T.L.; Larsen, T.; et al. Pathology of fatal West Nile virus infections in native and exotic birds during the 1999 outbreak in New York City, New York. Vet. Pathol. 2000, 37, 208–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Klenk, K.; Snow, J.; Morgan, K.; Bowen, R.; Stephens, M.; Foster, F.; Gordy, P.; Beckett, S.; Komar, N.; Gubler, D.; et al. Alligators as West Nile virus amplifiers. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 2150–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Miller, D.L.; Mauel, M.J.; Baldwin, C.; Burtle, G.; Ingram, D.; Hines, M.E., II; Frazier, K.S. West Nile virus in farmed alligators. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Austgen, L.E.; Bowen, R.A.; Bunning, M.L.; Davis, B.S.; Mitchell, C.J.; Chang, G.J. Experimental infection of cats and dogs with West Nile virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bunning, M.L.; Bowen, R.A.; Cropp, B.; Sullivan, K.; Davis, B.; Komar, N.; Godsey, M.; Baker, D.; Hettler, D.; Holmes, D.; et al. Experimental infection of horses with West Nile virus and their potential to infect mosquitoes and serve as amplifying hosts. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 338–339. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ostlund, E.N.; Crom, R.L.; Pedersen, D.D.; Johnson, D.J.; Williams, W.O.; Schmitt, B.J. Equine West Nile encephalitis, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 665–669. [Google Scholar]
  73. Salazar, P.; Traub-Dargatz, J.L.; Morley, P.S.; Wilmot, D.D.; Steffen, D.J.; Cunningham, W.E.; Salman, M.D. Outcome of equids with clinical signs of West Nile virus infection and factors associated with death. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 225, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schuler, L.A.; Khaitsa, M.L.; Dyer, N.W.; Stoltenow, C.L. Evaluation of an outbreak of West Nile virus infection in horses: 569 cases (2002). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 225, 1084–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Venter, M.; Human, S.; Zaayman, D.; Gerdes, G.H.; Williams, J.; Steyl, J.; Leman, P.A.; Paweska, J.T.; Setzkorn, H.; Rous, G.; et al. Lineage 2 West Nile virus as cause of fatal neurologic disease in horses, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Trock, S.C.; Meade, B.J.; Glaser, A.L.; Ostlund, E.N.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Cropp, B.C.; Kulasekera, V.; Kramer, L.D.; Komar, N. West Nile virus outbreak among horses in New York State, 1999 and 2000. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 745–747. [Google Scholar]
  77. NIH. Available online: http://www.Niaid.Nih.Gov/topics/biodefenserelated/biodefense/pages/cata.Aspx# (accessed on 5 September 2013).
  78. CDC. Available online: http://wwwn.Cdc.Gov/nndss/script/conditionsummary.Aspx?Condid=17 (accessed on 5 September 2013).
  79. CDC. Intrauterine West Nile virus infection—New York, 2002. MMWR Weekly 2002, 51, 1135–1136.
  80. CDC. Possible West Nile virus transmission to an infant through breast-Feeding—Michigan, 2002. MMWR Weekly 2002, 51, 877–878.
  81. Hayes, E.B.; O’Leary, D.R. West Nile virus infection: A pediatric perspective. Pediatrics 2004, 113, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. CDC. Transfusion-associated transmission of West Nile virus—Arizona, 2004. MMWR Weekly 2004, 53, 842–844.
  83. CDC. Investigations of West Nile virus infections in recipients of blood transfusions. MMWR Weekly 2002, 51, 973–974.
  84. CDC. Detection of West Nile virus in blood donations—United States, 2003. MMWR Weekly 2003, 52, 769–772.
  85. Hiatt, B.; DesJardin, L.; Carter, T.; Gingrich, R.; Thompson, C.; de Magalhaes-Silverman, M. A fatal case of West Nile virus infection in a bone marrow transplant recipient. Clin Infect. Dis 2003, 37, e129–e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. CDC. West Nile virus infection in organ donor and transplant recipients—Georgia and Florida, 2002. MMWR Weekly 2002, 51, 790.
  87. Iwamoto, M.; Jernigan, D.B.; Guasch, A.; Trepka, M.J.; Blackmore, C.G.; Hellinger, W.C.; Pham, S.M.; Zaki, S.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Lance-Parker, S.E.; et al. Transmission of West Nile virus from an organ donor to four transplant recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 2196–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. CDC. Possible dialysis-related West Nile virus transmission—Georgia, 2003. MMWR Weekly 2004, 53, 738–739.
  89. Cairoli, O. The West Nile virus and the dialysis/transplant patient. Nephrol News Issues 2005, 19, 73–75. [Google Scholar]
  90. CDC. Laboratory-acquired West Nile virus infections—United States, 2002. MMWR Weekly 2002, 51, 1133–1135.
  91. CDC. From the centers for disease control and prevention. Laboratory-acquired West Nile virus infections—United States, 2002. Jama 2003, 289, 414–415. [CrossRef]
  92. Gea-Banacloche, J.; Johnson, R.T.; Bagic, A.; Butman, J.A.; Murray, P.R.; Agrawal, A.G. West Nile virus: Pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 140, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mostashari, F.; Bunning, M.L.; Kitsutani, P.T.; Singer, D.A.; Nash, D.; Cooper, M.J.; Katz, N.; Liljebjelke, K.A.; Biggerstaff, B.J.; Fine, A.D.; et al. Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: Results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey. Lancet 2001, 358, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hayes, E.B.; Gubler, D.J. West Nile virus: Epidemiology and clinical features of an emerging epidemic in the United States. Annu Rev. Med. 2006, 57, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Del Giudice, P.; Schuffenecker, I.; Zeller, H.; Grelier, M.; Vandenbos, F.; Dellamonica, P.; Counillon, E. Skin manifestations of West Nile virus infection. Dermatology 2005, 211, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ferguson, D.D.; Gershman, K.; LeBailly, A.; Petersen, L.R. Characteristics of the rash associated with West Nile virus fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 1204–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jeha, L.E.; Sila, C.A.; Lederman, R.J.; Prayson, R.A.; Isada, C.M.; Gordon, S.M. West Nile virus infection: A new acute paralytic illness. Neurology 2003, 61, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kulstad, E.B.; Wichter, M.D. West Nile encephalitis presenting as a stroke. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2003, 41, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Perelman, A.; Stern, J. Acute pancreatitis in West Nile fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1974, 23, 1150–1152. [Google Scholar]
  100. Sampson, B.A.; Ambrosi, C.; Charlot, A.; Reiber, K.; Veress, J.F.; Armbrustmacher, V. The pathology of human West Nile virus infection. Hum. Pathol. 2000, 31, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Smith, R.D.; Konoplev, S.; DeCourten-Myers, G.; Brown, T. West Nile virus encephalitis with myositis and orchitis. Hum. Pathol. 2004, 35, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Khairallah, M.; Ben Yahia, S.; Ladjimi, A.; Zeghidi, H.; Ben Romdhane, F.; Besbes, L.; Zaouali, S.; Messaoud, R. Chorioretinal involvement in patients with West Nile virus infection. Ophthalmology 2004, 111, 2065–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hayes, E.B.; Sejvar, J.J.; Zaki, S.R.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Bode, A.V.; Campbell, G.L. Virology, pathology, and clinical manifestations of West Nile virus disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sejvar, J.J. The long-term outcomes of human West Nile virus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 44, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Klein, C.; Kimiagar, I.; Pollak, L.; Gandelman-Marton, R.; Itzhaki, A.; Milo, R.; Rabey, J.M. Neurological features of West Nile virus infection during the 2000 outbreak in a regional hospital in Israel. J. Neurol. Sci. 2002, 200, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sejvar, J.J.; Bode, A.V.; Marfin, A.A.; Campbell, G.L.; Ewing, D.; Mazowiecki, M.; Pavot, P.V.; Schmitt, J.; Pape, J.; Biggerstaff, B.J.; et al. West Nile virus-associated flaccid paralysis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Klee, A.L.; Maidin, B.; Edwin, B.; Poshni, I.; Mostashari, F.; Fine, A.; Layton, M.; Nash, D. Long-term prognosis for clinical West Nile virus infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sejvar, J.J.; Marfin, A.A. Manifestations of West Nile neuroinvasive disease. Rev. Med. Virol. 2006, 16, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Debiasi, R.L.; Tyler, K.L. West Nile virus meningoencephalitis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2006, 2, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sejvar, J.J.; Haddad, M.B.; Tierney, B.C.; Campbell, G.L.; Marfin, A.A.; van Gerpen, J.A.; Fleischauer, A.; Leis, A.A.; Stokic, D.S.; Petersen, L.R. Neurologic manifestations and outcome of West Nile virus infection. Jama 2003, 290, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kramer, L.D.; Li, J.; Shi, P.Y. West Nile virus. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Southam, C.M.; Moore, A.E. Induced virus infections in man by the Egypt isolates of West Nile virus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1954, 3, 19–50. [Google Scholar]
  113. Li, J.; Loeb, J.A.; Shy, M.E.; Shah, A.K.; Tselis, A.C.; Kupski, W.J.; Lewis, R.A. Asymmetric flaccid paralysis: A neuromuscular presentation of West Nile virus infection. Ann. Neurol 2003, 53, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sejvar, J.J.; Leis, A.A.; Stokic, D.S.; Van Gerpen, J.A.; Marfin, A.A.; Webb, R.; Haddad, M.B.; Tierney, B.C.; Slavinski, S.A.; Polk, J.L.; et al. Acute flaccid paralysis and West Nile virus infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Leis, A.A.; Stokic, D.S.; Webb, R.M.; Slavinski, S.A.; Fratkin, J. Clinical spectrum of muscle weakness in human West Nile virus infection. Muscle Nerve 2003, 28, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ahmed, S.; Libman, R.; Wesson, K.; Ahmed, F.; Einberg, K. Guillain-barre syndrome: An unusual presentation of West Nile virus infection. Neurology 2000, 55, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Park, M.; Hui, J.S.; Bartt, R.E. Acute anterior radiculitis associated with West Nile virus infection. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 2003, 74, 823–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cao, N.J.; Ranganathan, C.; Kupsky, W.J.; Li, J. Recovery and prognosticators of paralysis in West Nile virus infection. J. Neurol Sci 2005, 236, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Beasley, D.W. Vaccines and immunotherapeutics for the prevention and treatment of infections with West Nile virus. Immunotherapy 2011, 3, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Monath, T.P. Prospects for development of a vaccine against the West Nile virus. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Anon. Available online: http://www.Reuters.Com/article/rbsshealthcarenews/idusweb473420080212 (accessed on 5 September 2013).
  122. Ng, T.; Hathaway, D.; Jennings, N.; Champ, D.; Chiang, Y.W.; Chu, H.J. Equine vaccine for West Nile virus. Dev. Biol (Basel) 2003, 114, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  123. Tesh, R.B.; Arroyo, J.; Travassos Da Rosa, A.P.; Guzman, H.; Xiao, S.Y.; Monath, T.P. Efficacy of killed virus vaccine, live attenuated chimeric virus vaccine, and passive immunization for prevention of West Nile virus encephalitis in hamster model. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 1392–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nusbaum, K.E.; Wright, J.C.; Johnston, W.B.; Allison, A.B.; Hilton, C.D.; Staggs, L.A.; Stallknecht, D.E.; Shelnutt, J.L. Absence of humoral response in flamingos and red-tailed hawks to experimental vaccination with a killed West Nile virus vaccine. Avian Dis. 2003, 47, 750–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wolf, R.F.; Papin, J.F.; Hines-Boykin, R.; Chavez-Suarez, M.; White, G.L.; Sakalian, M.; Dittmer, D.P. Baboon model for West Nile virus infection and vaccine evaluation. Virology 2006, 355, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Samina, I.; Khinich, Y.; Simanov, M.; Malkinson, M. An inactivated West Nile virus vaccine for domestic geese-efficacy study and a summary of 4 years of field application. Vaccine 2005, 23, 4955–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Samina, I.; Havenga, M.; Koudstaal, W.; Khinich, Y.; Koldijk, M.; Malkinson, M.; Simanov, M.; Perl, S.; Gijsbers, L.; Weverling, G.J.; et al. Safety and efficacy in geese of a per.C6-based inactivated West Nile virus vaccine. Vaccine 2007, 25, 8338–8345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pinto, A.K.; Richner, J.M.; Poore, E.A.; Patil, P.P.; Amanna, I.J.; Slifka, M.K.; Diamond, M.S. A hydrogen peroxide-inactivated virus vaccine elicits humoral and cellular immunity and protects against lethal West Nile virus infection in aged mice. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 1926–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, T.; Anderson, J.F.; Magnarelli, L.A.; Wong, S.J.; Koski, R.A.; Fikrig, E. Immunization of mice against West Nile virus with recombinant envelope protein. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 5273–5277. [Google Scholar]
  130. Ledizet, M.; Kar, K.; Foellmer, H.G.; Wang, T.; Bushmich, S.L.; Anderson, J.F.; Fikrig, E.; Koski, R.A. A recombinant envelope protein vaccine against West Nile virus. Vaccine 2005, 23, 3915–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Watts, D.M.; Tesh, R.B.; Siirin, M.; Rosa, A.T.; Newman, P.C.; Clements, D.E.; Ogata, S.; Coller, B.A.; Weeks-Levy, C.; Lieberman, M.M. Efficacy and durability of a recombinant subunit West Nile vaccine candidate in protecting hamsters from West Nile encephalitis. Vaccine 2007, 25, 2913–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lieberman, M.M.; Clements, D.E.; Ogata, S.; Wang, G.; Corpuz, G.; Wong, T.; Martyak, T.; Gilson, L.; Coller, B.A.; Leung, J.; et al. Preparation and immunogenic properties of a recombinant West Nile subunit vaccine. Vaccine 2007, 25, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Mota, J.; Acosta, M.; Argotte, R.; Figueroa, R.; Mendez, A.; Ramos, C. Induction of protective antibodies against dengue virus by tetravalent DNA immunization of mice with domain III of the envelope protein. Vaccine 2005, 23, 3469–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wu, S.C.; Yu, C.H.; Lin, C.W.; Chu, I.M. The domain iii fragment of japanese encephalitis virus envelope protein: Mouse immunogenicity and liposome adjuvanticity. Vaccine 2003, 21, 2516–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. McDonald, W.F.; Huleatt, J.W.; Foellmer, H.G.; Hewitt, D.; Tang, J.; Desai, P.; Price, A.; Jacobs, A.; Takahashi, V.N.; Huang, Y.; et al. A West Nile virus recombinant protein vaccine that coactivates innate and adaptive immunity. J. Infect. Dis 2007, 195, 1607–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Martina, B.E.; Koraka, P.; van den Doel, P.; van Amerongen, G.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Osterhaus, A.D. Immunization with West Nile virus envelope domain III protects mice against lethal infection with homologous and heterologous virus. Vaccine 2008, 26, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Iyer, A.V.; Boudreaux, M.J.; Wakamatsu, N.; Roy, A.F.; Baghian, A.; Chouljenko, V.N.; Kousoulas, K.G. Complete genome analysis and virulence characteristics of the louisiana West Nile virus strain lsu-ar01. Virus Genes 2009, 38, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, A.; Iyer, A.V.; Kousoulas, K.G. West Nile domain iii-equine cd40l fusion protein elicits virus neutrailizing antibody responses in mice and horses. 2013; in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  139. Yang, J.S.; Kim, J.J.; Hwang, D.; Choo, A.Y.; Dang, K.; Maguire, H.; Kudchodkar, S.; Ramanathan, M.P.; Weiner, D.B. Induction of potent th1-type immune responses from a novel DNA vaccine for West Nile virus New York isolate (WNV-NY1999). J. Infect. Dis 2001, 184, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Davis, B.S.; Chang, G.J.; Cropp, B.; Roehrig, J.T.; Martin, D.A.; Mitchell, C.J.; Bowen, R.; Bunning, M.L. West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 4040–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bunning, M.L.; Fox, P.E.; Bowen, R.A.; Komar, N.; Chang, G.J.; Speaker, T.J.; Stephens, M.R.; Nemeth, N.; Panella, N.A.; Langevin, S.A.; et al. DNA vaccination of the american crow (corvus brachyrhynchos) provides partial protection against lethal challenge with West Nile virus. Avian Dis. 2007, 51, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Turell, M.J.; Bunning, M.; Ludwig, G.V.; Ortman, B.; Chang, J.; Speaker, T.; Spielman, A.; McLean, R.; Komar, N.; Gates, R.; et al. DNA vaccine for West Nile virus infection in fish crows (corvus ossifragus). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1077–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hall, R.A.; Nisbet, D.J.; Pham, K.B.; Pyke, A.T.; Smith, G.A.; Khromykh, A.A. DNA vaccine coding for the full-length infectious kunjin virus rna protects mice against the new york strain of West Nile virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10460–10464. [Google Scholar]
  144. Martin, J.E.; Pierson, T.C.; Hubka, S.; Rucker, S.; Gordon, I.J.; Enama, M.E.; Andrews, C.A.; Xu, Q.; Davis, B.S.; Nason, M.; et al. A West Nile virus DNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibody in healthy adults during a phase 1 clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 1732–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ledgerwood, J.E.; Pierson, T.C.; Hubka, S.A.; Desai, N.; Rucker, S.; Gordon, I.J.; Enama, M.E.; Nelson, S.; Nason, M.; Gu, W.; et al. A West Nile virus DNA vaccine utilizing a modified promoter induces neutralizing antibody in younger and older healthy adults in a phase I clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis 2011, 203, 1396–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chang, D.C.; Liu, W.J.; Anraku, I.; Clark, D.C.; Pollitt, C.C.; Suhrbier, A.; Hall, R.A.; Khromykh, A.A. Single-round infectious particles enhance immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine against West Nile virus. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wheeler, S.S.; Langevin, S.; Woods, L.; Carroll, B.D.; Vickers, W.; Morrison, S.A.; Chang, G.J.; Reisen, W.K.; Boyce, W.M. Efficacy of three vaccines in protecting western scrub-jays (aphelocoma californica) from experimental infection with West Nile virus: Implications for vaccination of island scrub-jays (aphelocoma insularis). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Grosenbaugh, D.A.; Backus, C.S.; Karaca, K.; Minke, J.M.; Nordgren, R.M. The anamnestic serologic response to vaccination with a canarypox virus-vectored recombinant West Nile virus (WNV) vaccine in horses previously vaccinated with an inactivated WNV vaccine. Vet. Ther. 2004, 5, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
  149. Siger, L.; Bowen, R.A.; Karaca, K.; Murray, M.J.; Gordy, P.W.; Loosmore, S.M.; Audonnet, J.C.; Nordgren, R.M.; Minke, J.M. Assessment of the efficacy of a single dose of a recombinant vaccine against West Nile virus in response to natural challenge with West Nile virus-infected mosquitoes in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2004, 65, 1459–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Minke, J.M.; Siger, L.; Karaca, K.; Austgen, L.; Gordy, P.; Bowen, R.; Renshaw, R.W.; Loosmore, S.; Audonnet, J.C.; Nordgren, B. Recombinant canarypoxvirus vaccine carrying the prm/e genes of West Nile virus protects horses against a West Nile virus-mosquito challenge. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 2004, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  151. Karaca, K.; Bowen, R.; Austgen, L.E.; Teehee, M.; Siger, L.; Grosenbaugh, D.; Loosemore, L.; Audonnet, J.C.; Nordgren, R.; Minke, J.M. Recombinant canarypox vectored West Nile Virus (WNV) vaccine protects dogs and cats against a mosquito WNV challenge. Vaccine 2005, 23, 3808–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Siger, L.; Bowen, R.; Karaca, K.; Murray, M.; Jagannatha, S.; Echols, B.; Nordgren, R.; Minke, J.M. Evaluation of the efficacy provided by a recombinant canarypox-vectored equine West Nile virus vaccine against an experimental West Nile virus intrathecal challenge in horses. Vet. Ther 2006, 7, 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  153. Iglesias, M.C.; Frenkiel, M.P.; Mollier, K.; Souque, P.; Despres, P.; Charneau, P. A single immunization with a minute dose of a lentiviral vector-based vaccine is highly effective at eliciting protective humoral immunity against West Nile virus. J. Gene Med. 2006, 8, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Despres, P.; Combredet, C.; Frenkiel, M.P.; Lorin, C.; Brahic, M.; Tangy, F. Live measles vaccine expressing the secreted form of the West Nile virus envelope glycoprotein protects against West Nile virus encephalitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 191, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Rosas, C.T.; Tischer, B.K.; Perkins, G.A.; Wagner, B.; Goodman, L.B.; Osterrieder, N. Live-attenuated recombinant equine herpesvirus type 1 (ehv-1) induces a neutralizing antibody response against West Nile Virus (WNV). Virus Res. 2007, 125, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Iyer, A.V.; Pahar, B.; Boudreaux, M.J.; Wakamatsu, N.; Roy, A.F.; Chouljenko, V.N.; Baghian, A.; Apetrei, C.; Marx, P.A.; Kousoulas, K.G. Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based West Nile vaccine elicits strong humoral and cellular immune responses and protects mice against lethal challenge with the virulent West Nile virus strain lsu-ar01. Vaccine 2009, 27, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Theiler, M.; Smith, H.H. The use of yellow fever virus modified by in vitro cultivation for human immunization. J. Exp. Med. 1937, 65, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Stokes, A.; Bauer, J.H.; Hudson, N.P. Experimental transmission of yellow fever to laboratory animals. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1928, 8, 103–164. [Google Scholar]
  159. Monath, T.P. Yellow fever: An update. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2001, 1, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Chambers, T.J.; Nestorowicz, A.; Mason, P.W.; Rice, C.M. Yellow fever/Japanese encephalitis chimeric viruses: Construction and biological properties. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 3095–3101. [Google Scholar]
  161. Guirakhoo, F.; Zhang, Z.X.; Chambers, T.J.; Delagrave, S.; Arroyo, J.; Barrett, A.D.; Monath, T.P. Immunogenicity, genetic stability, and protective efficacy of a recombinant, chimeric yellow fever-japanese encephalitis virus (chimerivax-je) as a live, attenuated vaccine Candidate against Japanese encephalitis. Virology 1999, 257, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bhatt, T.R.; Crabtree, M.B.; Guirakhoo, F.; Monath, T.P.; Miller, B.R. Growth characteristics of the chimeric Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine candidate, chimerivax-je (yf/je sa14-14-2), in culex tritaeniorhynchus, aedes albopictus, and aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2000, 62, 480–484. [Google Scholar]
  163. Monath, T.P.; Soike, K.; Levenbook, I.; Zhang, Z.X.; Arroyo, J.; Delagrave, S.; Myers, G.; Barrett, A.D.; Shope, R.E.; Ratterree, M.; et al. Recombinant, chimaeric live, attenuated vaccine (chimerivax) incorporating the envelope genes of Japanese encephalitis (sa14-14-2) virus and the capsid and nonstructural genes of yellow fever (17d) virus is safe, immunogenic and protective in non-human primates. Vaccine 1999, 17, 1869–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Monath, T.P.; Levenbook, I.; Soike, K.; Zhang, Z.X.; Ratterree, M.; Draper, K.; Barrett, A.D.; Nichols, R.; Weltzin, R.; Arroyo, J.; et al. Chimeric yellow fever virus 17d-Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine: Dose-response effectiveness and extended safety testing in rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 1742–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Monath, T.P.; Guirakhoo, F.; Nichols, R.; Yoksan, S.; Schrader, R.; Murphy, C.; Blum, P.; Woodward, S.; McCarthy, K.; Mathis, D.; et al. Chimeric live, attenuated vaccine against japanese encephalitis (chimerivax-je): Phase 2 clinical trials for safety and immunogenicity, effect of vaccine dose and schedule, and memory response to challenge with inactivated japanese encephalitis antigen. J. Infect. Dis 2003, 188, 1213–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Monath, T.P.; McCarthy, K.; Bedford, P.; Johnson, C.T.; Nichols, R.; Yoksan, S.; Marchesani, R.; Knauber, M.; Wells, K.H.; Arroyo, J.; et al. Clinical proof of principle for chimerivax: Recombinant live, attenuated vaccines against flavivirus infections. Vaccine 2002, 20, 1004–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Pugachev, K.V.; Guirakhoo, F.; Trent, D.W.; Monath, T.P. Traditional and novel approaches to flavivirus vaccines. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 567–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Caufour, P.S.; Motta, M.C.; Yamamura, A.M.; Vazquez, S.; Ferreira, II; Jabor, A.V.; Bonaldo, M.C.; Freire, M.S.; Galler, R. Construction, characterization and immunogenicity of recombinant yellow fever 17d-dengue type 2 viruses. Virus Res. 2001, 79, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Guirakhoo, F.; Arroyo, J.; Pugachev, K.V.; Miller, C.; Zhang, Z.X.; Weltzin, R.; Georgakopoulos, K.; Catalan, J.; Ocran, S.; Soike, K.; et al. Construction, safety, and immunogenicity in nonhuman primates of a chimeric yellow fever-dengue virus tetravalent vaccine. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 7290–7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Guirakhoo, F.; Pugachev, K.; Arroyo, J.; Miller, C.; Zhang, Z.X.; Weltzin, R.; Georgakopoulos, K.; Catalan, J.; Ocran, S.; Draper, K.; et al. Viremia and immunogenicity in nonhuman primates of a tetravalent yellow fever-dengue chimeric vaccine: Genetic reconstructions, dose adjustment, and antibody responses against wild-type dengue virus isolates. Virology 2002, 298, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Guirakhoo, F.; Weltzin, R.; Chambers, T.J.; Zhang, Z.X.; Soike, K.; Ratterree, M.; Arroyo, J.; Georgakopoulos, K.; Catalan, J.; Monath, T.P. Recombinant chimeric yellow fever-dengue type 2 virus is immunogenic and protective in nonhuman primates. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 5477–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. van Der Most, R.G.; Murali-Krishna, K.; Ahmed, R.; Strauss, J.H. Chimeric yellow fever/dengue virus as a candidate dengue vaccine: Quantitation of the dengue virus-specific cd8 t-cell response. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 8094–8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Guirakhoo, F.; Pugachev, K.; Zhang, Z.; Myers, G.; Levenbook, I.; Draper, K.; Lang, J.; Ocran, S.; Mitchell, F.; Parsons, M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of chimeric yellow fever-dengue virus tetravalent vaccine formulations in nonhuman primates. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 4761–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Edelman, R. Dengue vaccines approach the finish line. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45 (Suppl 1), S56–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Arroyo, J.; Miller, C.; Catalan, J.; Myers, G.A.; Ratterree, M.S.; Trent, D.W.; Monath, T.P. Chimerivax-West Nile virus live-attenuated vaccine: Preclinical evaluation of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 12497–12507. [Google Scholar]
  176. Monath, T.P.; Liu, J.; Kanesa-Thasan, N.; Myers, G.A.; Nichols, R.; Deary, A.; McCarthy, K.; Johnson, C.; Ermak, T.; Shin, S.; et al. A live, attenuated recombinant West Nile virus vaccine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6694–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Biedenbender, R.; Bevilacqua, J.; Gregg, A.M.; Watson, M.; Dayan, G. Phase ii, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to investigate the immunogenicity and safety of a West Nile virus vaccine in healthy adults. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Dayan, G.H.; Bevilacqua, J.; Coleman, D.; Buldo, A.; Risi, G. Phase ii, dose ranging study of the safety and immunogenicity of single dose West Nile vaccine in healthy adults >/= 50 years of age. Vaccine 2012, 30, 6656–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. De Filette, M.; Ulbert, S.; Diamond, M.; Sanders, N.N. Recent progress in West Nile virus diagnosis and vaccination. Vet. Res. 2012, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Qiao, M.; Ashok, M.; Bernard, K.A.; Palacios, G.; Zhou, Z.H.; Lipkin, W.I.; Liang, T.J. Induction of sterilizing immunity against West Nile Virus (WNV), by immunization with WNV-like particles produced in insect cells. J. Infect. Dis 2004, 190, 2104–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Komarov, A.; Kalmar, E. A hitherto undescribed disease—Turkey meningoencephalitis. Vet. Rec. 1960, 72, 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  182. Malkinson, M.; Banet, C.; Khinich, Y.; Samina, I.; Pokamunski, S.; Weisman, Y. Use of live and inactivated vaccines in the control of West Nile fever in domestic geese. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 951, 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  183. Price, W.H.; Thind, I.S. Protection against West Nile virus induced by a previous injection with dengue virus. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1971, 94, 596–607. [Google Scholar]
  184. Tesh, R.B.; Travassos da Rosa, A.P.; Guzman, H.; Araujo, T.P.; Xiao, S.Y. Immunization with heterologous flaviviruses protective against fatal West Nile encephalitis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Hall, R.A.; Khromykh, A.A. West Nile virus vaccines. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2004, 4, 1295–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kanesa-Thasan, N.; Putnak, J.R.; Mangiafico, J.A.; Saluzzo, J.E.; Ludwig, G.V. Short report: Absence of protective neutralizng antibodies to West Nile virus in subjects following vaccination with japanese encephalitis or dengue vaccines. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2002, 66, 115–116. [Google Scholar]
  187. Takasaki, T.; Yabe, S.; Nerome, R.; Ito, M.; Yamada, K.; Kurane, I. Partial protective effect of inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine on lethal West Nile virus infection in mice. Vaccine 2003, 21, 4514–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Engle, M.J.; Diamond, M.S. Antibody prophylaxis and therapy against West Nile virus infection in wild-type and immunodeficient mice. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 12941–12949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ledizet, M.; Kar, K.; Foellmer, H.G.; Bonafe, N.; Anthony, K.G.; Gould, L.H.; Bushmich, S.L.; Fikrig, E.; Koski, R.A. Antibodies targeting linear determinants of the envelope protein protect mice against West Nile virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 1741–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Shimoni, Z.; Niven, M.J.; Pitlick, S.; Bulvik, S. Treatment of West Nile virus encephalitis with intravenous immunoglobulin. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001, 7, 759. [Google Scholar]
  191. Hamdan, A.; Green, P.; Mendelson, E.; Kramer, M.R.; Pitlik, S.; Weinberger, M. Possible benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a lung transplant recipient with West Nile virus encephalitis. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2002, 4, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Haley, M.; Retter, A.S.; Fowler, D.; Gea-Banacloche, J.; O'Grady, N.P. The role for intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of West Nile virus encephalitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, e88–e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lustig, S.; Olshevsky, U.; Ben-Nathan, D.; Lachmi, B.E.; Malkinson, M.; Kobiler, D.; Halevy, M. A live attenuated West Nile virus strain as a potential veterinary vaccine. Viral. Immunol. 2000, 13, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Pletnev, A.G.; Claire, M.S.; Elkins, R.; Speicher, J.; Murphy, B.R.; Chanock, R.M. Molecularly engineered live-attenuated chimeric West Nile/Dengue virus vaccines protect rhesus monkeys from West Nile virus. Virology 2003, 314, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Pletnev, A.G.; Swayne, D.E.; Speicher, J.; Rumyantsev, A.A.; Murphy, B.R. Chimeric West Nile/dengue virus vaccine candidate: Preclinical evaluation in mice, geese and monkeys for safety and immunogenicity. Vaccine 2006, 24, 6392–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Huang, C.Y.; Silengo, S.J.; Whiteman, M.C.; Kinney, R.M. Chimeric dengue 2 PDK-53/West Nile NY99 viruses retain the phenotypic attenuation markers of the candidate PDK-53 vaccine virus and protect mice against lethal challenge with West Nile virus. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 7300–7310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Yamshchikov, G.; Borisevich, V.; Seregin, A.; Chaporgina, E.; Mishina, M.; Mishin, V.; Kwok, C.W.; Yamshchikov, V. An attenuated West Nile prototype virus is highly immunogenic and protects against the deadly NY99 strain: A candidate for live WN vaccine development. Virology 2004, 330, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iyer, A.V.; Kousoulas, K.G. A Review of Vaccine Approaches for West Nile Virus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 4200-4223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094200

AMA Style

Iyer AV, Kousoulas KG. A Review of Vaccine Approaches for West Nile Virus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(9):4200-4223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iyer, Arun V., and Konstantin G. Kousoulas. 2013. "A Review of Vaccine Approaches for West Nile Virus" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10, no. 9: 4200-4223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094200

APA Style

Iyer, A. V., & Kousoulas, K. G. (2013). A Review of Vaccine Approaches for West Nile Virus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(9), 4200-4223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094200

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop