Next Article in Journal
Clear Skies and Grey Areas: Flight Attendants’ Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Attitudes toward Smoke-Free Policy 25 Years since Smoking was Banned on Airplanes
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Different Degrees of Feedback on Physical Activity Levels: A 4-Week Intervention Study
Previous Article in Journal
SaDA: From Sampling to Data Analysis—An Extensible Open Source Infrastructure for Rapid, Robust and Automated Management and Analysis of Modern Ecological High-Throughput Microarray Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Creating an Interest in Research and Development as a Means of Reducing the Gap between Theory and Practice in Primary Care: An Interventional Study Based on Strategic Communication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake

Institute of Military Health Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Rd, Shanghai 200433, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(6), 6367-6377; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606367
Submission received: 13 April 2015 / Revised: 18 May 2015 / Accepted: 1 June 2015 / Published: 4 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Behaviors and Public Health)

Abstract

:
Background: An earthquake struck Ludian in Yunnan Province (China) on 3 August 2014, resulting in 3143 injuries, 617 deaths, and 112 missing persons. Our study aimed at estimating the health status and associated determinants among adolescent survivors after the Ludian earthquake. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 845 was conducted at the Ludian No. 1 Middle School. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA and stepwise linear regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: The mean scores on the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) were 46.23 (SD = 7.10) and 36.34 (SD = 7.09), respectively. Lower PCS scores in the aftermath of an earthquake were associated with being trapped or in danger, being female, being an ethnic minority, injury to self and house damage, while lower MSC scores were associated with fear during the earthquake, Han ethnicity, death in the family, not being involved in the rescue and low household income. Conclusions: In our study, significant associations between demographic, socio-economic, and trauma-related experiences variables and overall physical and mental health of adolescent survivors were presented. The results of this study help expand our knowledge of health status among adolescent survivors after the Ludian earthquake.

1. Introduction

An earthquake measuring 6.5 on the magnitude scale and 8.0 on the intensity scale, struck Ludian in Yunnan Province (China) at 4:30 p.m. local time on Sunday, 3 August 2014. Often referred to as the Ludian earthquake, this disaster resulted in 3143 injuries, 617 deaths, and 112 missing persons. While an earthquake may cause disastrous loss of life, homes, and livelihoods instantly, it can also cause serious psychological effects for survivors as well as physical injuries and the exacerbation of existing physical conditions [1,2]. Mental and physical impairment following an earthquake will inevitably affect one’s health status. The instruments of health status, such as the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), and more recently the acute version of the Short Form-12 (SF-12), had brought significant benefit for all researches concerned with health outcomes [3].
There is an emerging literature on health status among survivors of earthquakes. Many studies have emphasized that earthquakes impair the health status of survivors [1,2,4,5,6,7,8], and several studies have been conducted to explore the determinants of poor health outcomes [9,10,11,12,13]. However, most of these studies focused on the health conditions of adults. Only three focused on the health status of children and adolescents and the sample numbers were limited (ranging from 511 to 596) [8,9,13]. Enabling children and adolescents who have survived disasters to achieve and maintain the same standards of health as other children and adolescents has been a goal of international communities [14].
In our study, a population-based survey of 845 adolescents aged between 14 and 19 years was conducted in Ludian County one month after the disaster, to estimate the health status and associated determinants, and provide evidence-based suggestions for specific health interventions in vulnerable populations.

2. Method

2.1. Study Design and Participants

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in September 2014, by which time one month had passed since the event. Our study participants comprised all senior students (Grade 1–Grade 3) who were present at the Ludian No. 1 Middle School at the time of our evaluation and had experienced the Ludian earthquake themselves. A total of 1030 senior students were approached: 113 were excluded from our investigation since they did not experience the Ludian earthquake themselves and 11 refused to participate in the investigation. Thus, 906 senior students completed the questionnaire, and 61 questionnaires were excluded because of missing items. The total number of completed questionnaires was 845.

2.2. Data Collection

The survey took place in the classrooms of the school. Two survey teams were established, each comprised of three graduate students and one professional staff member of the Second Military Medical University. Professional staff members briefed prospective respondents about the details of the study and answered questions related to the study since the comprehension ability of the middle school students was limited. Approval was obtained from the school principal who made an announcement about the study to the students. The study obtained the approval from the ethics committee of Second Military Medical University, and all the participants were voluntary to participate in our survey (Project identification code: 91224005).

2.3. Measurements

The social and demographic information included gender, age, ethnicity, annual household income, and disease history. Earthquake-related experiences were assessed with an inventory adapted from a commonly used earthquake exposure scale [15]. “Disease history” did not refer to any injuries caused by the earthquake. It included both physical and mental illness that can influence one’s daily life, such as autism, bone fractures, poliomyelitis, congenital heart disease and so on. “Injury” referred to all injuries caused by the Ludian earthquake, regardless of whether the injuries had been healed during our investigation.
The health status of the students was measured using the acute version of the Short Form-12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a subset of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) scale. Translated into multiple languages, the SF-12 includes one item from each of the bodily pain, general health, vitality, and social functioning scales and two items from each of the physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, and mental health scales of the SF-36 [16]. In addition, the SF-12 assesses overall physical and mental functioning using two summary scales: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) [17]. The participants were asked to report the general health status by recalling their personal experience in the previous four weeks and responding to the 12 items. It takes only two to three minutes to complete the 12 items. Higher summary PCS and MCS scores are indicative of better health [18]. The Chinese version of the SF-12 used in this study (Appendix) has been validated in Chinese adolescents [19].

2.4. Data Analysis

All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We first calculated the descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations [SD]); then, t-tests (for two-group comparisons) and analysis of variance (ANOVA, for multi-group comparisons) were used to evaluate differences in continuous variables if the data were in accordance with assumptions regarding the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance; otherwise, a non-parametric method was used. Stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PCS and MCS, and beta coefficients (B), standardized error of the coefficient (S.E.B), and standardized regression coefficient (Beta) were reported. The criterion for statistical significance was p = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Social-Demographic Characteristics and Earthquake-Related Experiences

Table 1 summarizes the social-demographic characteristics and earthquake-related experiences of the participants. The mean scores on the PCS and MCS were 46.23 (SD = 7.10) and 36.34 (SD = 7.09), respectively. Of the 845 participants, 456 (53.96%) were male, 803 (95.03%) were of Han descent (the major ethnic population in China), and over half (58.7%) were 16 or 17 years old. Most families (94.67%) earned less than 8000 Yuan per year, and 688 participants (81.42%) had no history of disease. With regard to earthquake-related experiences, only 83 participants (9.82%) were injured due to the earthquake, 272 (32.19%) reported that a family member was injured in the earthquake, 189 (22.39%) reported that a family member died in the earthquake, most (816; 96.57%) felt fear during the earthquake, and 317 (37.51%) were trapped or in danger in the earthquake. Few houses (15; 1.78%) were in excellent condition without damage. After the earthquake, 333 participants (39.41%) were involved in the rescue. Over half of participants (485; 57.4%) had experienced an earthquake before, and most participants (740; 87.57%) had received escape training before the earthquake.
Table 1. Demographics and earthquake-related experiences among adolescent survivors of the Ludian earthquake, China.
Table 1. Demographics and earthquake-related experiences among adolescent survivors of the Ludian earthquake, China.
VariableNPercentage (%)PCSMSC
MeanpMeanp
Total84546.23 (7.10)36.34 (7.09)
Gender 0.002 0.844
 Male45654.046.93 (7.17) 36.29 (7.03)
 Female38946.045.40 (6.93) 36.39 (7.17)
Age 0.879 0.502
 14283.346.12 (6.26) 38.07 (6.16)
 1514517.246.21 (6.47) 36.56 (6.57)
 1626831.745.98 (7.52) 36.25 (7.20)
 1722827.046.67 (6.81) 36.01 (7.24)
 1811914.146.31 (7.46) 35.92 (7.02)
 19576.845.53 (7.47) 37.52 (7.76)
Ethnicity 0.002 0.005
 Han80395.046.40 (7.05) 36.18 (7.03)
 Minority425.042.98 (7.33) 39.35 (7.66)
Annual household income (yuan) 0.278 0.005
 1000–400060972.146.41 (7.10) 35.86 (6.97)
 4000–800019122.645.48 (7.12) 37.94 (7.31)
 8000–12000384.547.33 (6.87) 35.83 (6.93)
 >1200070.844.45 (6.67) 36.81 (6.96)
History of disease 0.072 0.267
 No68881.446.44 (7.03) 36.21 (6.96)
 Yes15718.645.31 (7.32) 36.91 (7.63)
Injury to self due to earthquake 0.004 0.407
 No76290.246.46 (7.03) 36.27 (7.09)
 Yes839.844.08 (7.40) 36.95 (7.08)
Injury in the family due to earthquake 0.027 0.137
 No57367.846.60 (7.08) 36.09 (7.07)
 Yes27232.245.44 (7.09) 36.87 (7.10)
Death in the family due to earthquake 0.224 0.008
 No65577.646.06 (7.31) 36.69 (6.79)
 Yes18922.446.77 (6.30) 35.15 (7.94)
Fear during the earthquake 0.489 0.029
 No293.445.09 (6.59) 38.95 (7.94)
 A little24228.646.33 (6.92) 37.03 (6.72)
 Some17620.846.51 (6.96) 36.48 (7.57)
 Much25329.946.52 (7.15) 35.90 (7.06)
 Extremely14517.245.41 (7.55) 35.25 (6.78)
Trapped or in danger <0.001 0.001
 No52862.547.06 (6.99) 35.99 (6.62)
 Yes31737.544.83 (7.07) 36.92 (7.78)
House damage due to earthquake 0.020 0.091
 No151.845.68 (8.39) 40.26 (6.24)
 Slight damage14216.847.61 (6.39) 36.07 (6.88)
 Moderate damage26431.246.69 (6.94) 35.76 (6.82)
 Partial collapse25630.345.69 (7.73) 36.42 (7.37)
 Complete collapse16819.945.18 (6.60) 37.00 (7.22)
Involved in the rescue 0.159 0.228
 No51260.646.46 (7.29) 35.83 (6.89)
 Yes33339.445.86 (6.79) 37.13 (7.32)
Psychological counseling 0.302 0.561
 No48156.946.44 (6.66) 36.22 (6.92)
 Yes36443.145.94 (7.63) 36.50 (7.30)
Experienced previous earthquake 0.130 0.374
 No36042.646.65 (7.43) 36.09 (7.10)
 Yes48557.445.91 (6.82) 36.53 (7.08)
Escape training 0.321 0.238
 No10512.445.58 (6.75) 37.10 (7.84)
 Yes74087.646.32 (7.14) 36.23 (6.97)

3.2. Factors Associated with Physical Component Summary

Bivariate analyses (Table 1) were conducted to assess the health status during the aftermath of the earthquake, as measured by the PCS. Significant PCS scores were associated with gender (p= 0.002), ethnicity (p = 0.002), injury to self (p = 0.004), injury in the family (p = 0.027), being trapped or in danger (p < 0.001), and house damage (p = 0.02). Multiple stepwise regression analyses (Table 2) revealed that lower PCS scores in the aftermath of an earthquake were associated with being trapped or in danger (p = 0.001), being female (p = 0.003), being an ethnic minority (p = 0.007), injury to self (p = 0.019), and house damage (p = 0.032).
Table 2. Multiple stepwise regression analysis of factors independently associated with PCS and MCS.
Table 2. Multiple stepwise regression analysis of factors independently associated with PCS and MCS.
LabelB aS.E.B bB cp d
Dependent variable: PCS
Trapped or in danger (No (0), Yes (1))−1.6760.505−0.1140.001
Gender (Male (0),Female (1))−1.4280.480−0.1000.003
Ethnicity (Han (0),Minority (1))−2.9701.105−0.0910.007
Injury to self due to earthquake (No (0), Yes (1))−1.8980.811−0.0800.019
House damage due to earthquake (No (0), Yes (1))−0.4990.232−0.0730.032
Dependent variable: MCS
Fear during the earthquake (No (0), Yes (1))−0.5910.208−0.0960.000
Ethnicity (Han(0),Minority(1))3.1201.1030.0960.005
Death in the family due to earthquake (No (0), Yes (1))−1.6050.576−0.0940.005
Involved in the rescue (No (0), Yes (1))1.2300.4910.0850.005
Annual household income (1000–4000 (0), 4000–8000 (1), 8000–12000 (2), >12000 (3))0.9680.3980.0820.012
a Unstandardized regression coefficient; b Standardized error of coefficient; c Standardized regression coefficient; d The inclusion criteria of the stepwise regression was p = 0.05; exclusion criteria was p = 0.10.

3.3. Factors associated with Mental Component Summary

Bivariate analyses (Table 1) were conducted to assess the health status during the aftermath of the earthquake, as measured by the MCS. Significant MCS scores were associated with ethnicity (p = 0.005), annual household income (p = 0.005), death in the family (p = 0.008), fear during the earthquake (p = 0.029), and being trapped or in danger (p = 0.001). Multiple stepwise regression analyses (Table 2) revealed that lower MSC scores in the aftermath of the earthquake were associated with fear during the earthquake (p < 0.001), Han ethnicity (p = 0.005), death in the family (p = 0.005), not being involved in the rescue (p = 0.005), and low household income (p = 0.012).

4. Discussion

Experiencing a disastrous earthquakeresults in mental and physical impairment among adolescent survivors. Using the SF-12 as an instrument to assess the impact of the Ludian earthquake on the health status of adolescent survivors, we found that the Ludian earthquake survivors had both worse PCS (46.2 vs. 49.8) and MCS (36.3 vs. 45.4) than the general adolescent population in China [19]. This result indicated that the health outcomes of adolescent survivors had been impaired by the Ludian earthquake. However, there were no values for the same adolescent population before the earthquake in our study. As a result, we cannot figure out what the acute extent the earthquake influenced the adolescents’ health status there.
With respect to risk factors related to physical health status among adolescent survivors, we found that the following variables had a strong negative association with physical health: female gender, being trapped, injury, minority ethnicity, and house damage. Research shows that girls are more worried about their bodies than boys are; they are more concerned with themselves and their well-being, and are more sensitive [20]. Moreover, adolescents experience increasing discrepancies in their physical and hormonal development as they age. Menstruation disorders have become the most common health problems following colds and influenza [21]. The hormonal fluctuations experienced by female adolescents may also lead to poorer perceptions of their own health status. Those who were trapped during the earthquake or experienced house damage often experienced physical injuries. In addition, survivors who experienced severe house damage had to live in temporary shelters with poor conditions, high population density, and poor ventilation. The risk of occurrence and spread of acute respiratory infections among the victims that lived in the temporary settlements was very high, particularly for acute infections such as the common cold [5]. Published studies have also found an association between physical health and housing conditions [12,22,23].
Our study also indicated an interesting phenomenon, that is, people of ethnic minorities tended to experience worse physical health status but better mental health status compared to those of Han nationality. However, we only included 42 participants (4.97%) from ethnic minorities; further research is needed to investigate differences in psychological and biological mechanisms between ethnic minorities and the Han population in the face of a traumatic disaster.
With regard to psychological health status, we also found that being scared and losing family members during the earthquake corresponded to lower MCS scores among the adolescent survivors. One study found that adolescents who had lost family members were 6.6 and 4.1 times more likely to develop PTSD and depression than those who did not, respectively [9]. Another study also indicated that adolescents who experienced the death of family members were more likely to have symptoms of anxiety [24]. It is likely that fear per se does not decrease one’s mental health status; this effect was perhaps mediated instead by the subjective experience of the natural disaster and personality type [25]. For example, individuals with high neuroticism tend to be more reactive and sensitive to adverse events, possibly increasing their risk of developing depression [26]. We also found that participating in rescue work after the earthquake and high family income corresponded to higher MCS scores. Adolescents who are involved in rescue work right after a disaster show better resilience to the adversity than those who refuse to participate in rescue work [27]. In addition, teachers and parents praised adolescents who were involved in rescue work and talked about their helpful deed to others. In this way, these adolescents’ felt a great deal of self-respect and self–satisfaction, which most likely helped increase their mental health status. In terms of family income, we expect that level of household income indirectly influenced economic resources, social status, social networks, and health behavior. Thus, those with a higher family income might use better coping methods because of their parents’ greater social and economic resources, ultimately contributing to better mental health status after facing natural disasters. However, since the adolescents did not contribute to the family income, information about household income obtained from them may not always have been accurate. Further research is needed to examine the effects of family income on mental health status in the future.
The current study has a few limitations that are worthy of note. First, because it was an exploratory cross-sectional study, it was difficult to conclude to what extent the earthquake had an effect on those who experienced it, as no pre-disaster comparison data was available. Second, although the study was conducted adequately by trained investigators, data collection relied solely on retrospective self-reports of the survivors, which can be subject to recall and desirability biases. Third, the study sample was recruited from one of the most affected middle schools in Ludian County, meaning that it is not appropriate to generalize these conclusions to those of less affected regions. Despite these limitations, the present study is one of only a few cross-sectional studies focusing on health status and its risk factors in adolescent populations following an earthquake. In our study, significant associations between demographic, socio-economic, and trauma-related experiences variables and overall physical and mental health of adolescent survivors were presented.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of this study help expand our knowledge of health status of adolescent survivors after the Ludian earthquake, lead to greater vigilance of and attention to those adolescence who were most compromised by the earthquake. This study provides important information for monitoring the course of recovery of adolescents after earthquake and is of great significance for public awareness and sensitive care for those who were the most affected. Specific care and psychological health interventions should be provided to those adolescents whose health status was relatively low.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Lulu Zhang, grant number 91224005), the major project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Lulu Zhang, grant number 71233008), Joint Research Project in major disease at the Shanghai Health Service (Lulu Zhang, grant number 2013ZYJB0006), the National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars (Yuan Liu, grant number 71103194, Xu Liu, grant number 71303249).

Author Contributions

Bihan Tang, Yang Ge and Chen Xue contributed equally to this work. Bihan Tang and Lulu Zhang conceived the idea and the designed the study. Bihan Tang, Peng Kang, Zhipeng Liu, Wenya Yu, collected the data. Bihan Tang, and Yang Ge draft the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix

The Chinese version of the SF-12 used in our study.
1. In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?
2. Limitations in moderate activities, such as moving a table, or doing some cleaning?
3. Limitations in climbing several flights of stairs?
4. During the past 4 weeks, have you accomplished less than you would like as a result of your physical health?
5. During the past 4 weeks, were you limited in the kind of study or other regular daily activities you do as a result of your physical health?
6. During the past 4 weeks, have you accomplished less than you would like as a result of any emotional problems, such as feeling depressed or anxious?
7. During the past 4 weeks, did you not do study or other regular activities as carefully as usual as a result of any emotional problems, such as feeling depressed or anxious?
8. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal study?
9. How much of the time during the past 4 weeks have you felt calm and peaceful?
10. How much of the time during the past 4 weeks did you have a lot of energy?
11. How much of the time during the past 4 weeks have you felt downhearted and blue?
12. How much of the time have your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your social activities, like visiting with friends or relatives?

References

  1. Seplaki, C.L.; Goldman, N.; Weinstein, M.; Lin, Y.H. Before and after the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake: Traumatic events and depressive symptoms in an older population. Soc. Sci. Med. 2006, 62, 3121–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ke, X.; Liu, C.; Li, N. Social support and quality of life: A cross-sectional study on survivors eight months after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. BMC Public Health 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ware, J.; Kosinski, M.; Keller, S.D. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 1996, 34, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ceyhan, E.; Ceyhan, A.A. Earthquake survivors’ quality of life and academic achievement six years after the earthquakes in Marmara, Turkey. Disasters 2007, 31, 516–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kun, P.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Le, H.; Gong, X.; Zhang, L.; Yao, L. Public health status and influence factors after 2008 Wenchuan earthquake among survivors in Sichuan province, China: Cross-sectional trial. Public Health 2010, 124, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sudaryo, M.K.; Besral; Endarti, A.T.; Rivany, R.; Phalkey, R.; Marx, M.; Guha-Sapir, D. Injury, disability and quality of life after the 2009 earthquake in Padang, Indonesia : A prospective cohort study of adult survivors. Glob. Health Action 2012, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sengul, A.; Ozer, E.; Salman, S.; Salman, F.; Saglam, Z.; Sargin, M.; Hatun, S.; Satman, I.; Yilmaz, T. Lessons learnt from influences of the Marmara earthquake on Glycemic control and quality of life in people with type 1 diabetes. Endocr. J. 2004, 51, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goenjian, A.K.; Roussos, A.; Steinberg, A.M.; Sotiropoulou, C.; Walling, D.; Kakaki, M.; Karagianni, S. Longitudinal study of ptsd, depression, and quality of life among adolescents after the Parnitha earthquake. J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 133, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jia, Z.; Tian, W.; He, X.; Liu, W.; Jin, C.; Ding, H. Mental health and quality of life survey among child survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tsai, K.Y.; Chou, P.; Chou, F.H.; Su, T.T.; Lin, S.C.; Lu, M.K.; Ou-Yang, W.C.; Su, C.Y.; Chao, S.S.; Huang, M.W.; et al. Three-year follow-up study of the relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms and quality of life among earthquake survivors in Yu-chi, Taiwan. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2007, 41, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wen, J.; Shi, Y.K.; Li, Y.P.; Yuan, P.; Wang, F. Quality of life, physical diseases, and psychological impairment among survivors 3 years after Wenchuan earthquake: A population based survey. PLoS ONE 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chou, F.H.; Chou, P.; Su, T.T.; Ou-Yang, W.C.; Chien, I.C.; Lu, M.K.; Huang, M.W. Quality of life and related risk factors in a taiwanese village population 21 months after an earthquake. Austr. N. Zeal. J. Psych. 2004, 38, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, W.; Jia, Z.; Duan, G.; Liu, W.; Pan, X.; Guo, Q.; Chen, R.; Zhang, X. Longitudinal study on health-related quality of life among child and adolescent survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Qual. Life Res. 2013, 22, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. UNICEF. A Treasure Chest of Hope for Children Impacted by Disastersand War. 2009. Available online: http://www.unicef.org/media/media_50668.html (accessed on 19 May 2015).
  15. Roussos, A.; Goenjian, A.K.; Steinberg, A.M.; Sotiropoulou, C.; Kakaki, M.; Kabakos, C.; Karagianni, S.; Manouras, V. Posttraumatic stress and depressive reactions among children and adolescents after the 1999 earthquake in Ano Liosia, Greece. Amer. J. Psych. 2005, 162, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lam, C.L.; Tse, E.Y.; Gandek, B. Is the standard sf-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a chinese population? Qual. Life Res. 2005, 14, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Liang, Y.; Cao, R.X. Is the health status of female victims poorer than males in the post-disaster reconstruction in china: A comparative study of data on male victims in the first survey and double tracking survey data. BMC Womens. Health 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Larson, C.O.; Schlundt, D.; Patel, K.; Beard, K.; Hargreaves, M. Validity of the sf-12 for use in a low-income African American community-based research initiative (reach 2010). Prev. Chronic Dis. 2008. Available online: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/18341779 (accessed on 19 May 2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. Fong, D.Y.; Lam, C.L.; Mak, K.K.; Lo, W.S.; Lai, Y.K.; Ho, S.Y.; Lam, T.H. The short form-12 health survey was a valid instrument in chinese adolescents. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010, 63, 1020–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Arrington-Sanders, R.; Yi, M.S.; Tsevat, J.; Wilmott, R.W.; Mrus, J.M.; Britto, M.T. Gender differences in health-related quality of life of adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bisegger, C.; Cloetta, B.; von Rueden, U.; Abel, T.; Ravens-Sieberer, U. Health-related quality of life: Gender differences in childhood and adolescence. Sozial.-und Praventivmedizin. 2005, 50, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Thomson, H.; Petticrew, M.; Morrison, D. Health effects of housing improvement: Systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ 2001, 323, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lefante, J.J., Jr.; Harmon, G.N.; Ashby, K.M.; Barnard, D.; Webber, L.S. Use of the sf-8 to assess health-related quality of life for a chronically ill, low-income population participating in the central Louisiana medication access program (CMAP). Qual. Life Res. 2005, 14, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Mo, L.; Liu, X. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among adolescents following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. J. Traumatic Stress 2011, 24, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, M. One year later: Mental health problems among survivors in hard-hit areas of the Wenchuan earthquake. Public Health 2011, 125, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tang, B.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Xue, C.; Zhang, L. A meta-analysis of risk factors for depression in adults and children after natural disasters. BMC Public Health 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cerda, M.; Paczkowski, M.; Galea, S.; Nemethy, K.; Pean, C.; Desvarieux, M. Psychopathology in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake: A population-based study of posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression. Depress. Anxiety 2013, 30, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, B.; Ge, Y.; Xue, C.; Kang, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Yu, W.; Zhang, L. Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 6367-6377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606367

AMA Style

Tang B, Ge Y, Xue C, Kang P, Liu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Yu W, Zhang L. Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(6):6367-6377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Bihan, Yang Ge, Chen Xue, Peng Kang, Yuan Liu, Xu Liu, Zhipeng Liu, Wenya Yu, and Lulu Zhang. 2015. "Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, no. 6: 6367-6377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606367

APA Style

Tang, B., Ge, Y., Xue, C., Kang, P., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Liu, Z., Yu, W., & Zhang, L. (2015). Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 6367-6377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606367

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop