Hands-On Experience of Crowdsourcing for Flood Risks. An Android Mobile Application Tested in Frederikssund, Denmark
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area
3. Methodology
4. Services for Flooding
4.1. Water-Level Measurement
4.2. Preparedness for Flood Events
4.3. Location-Based Upload of Exposed Elements
4.4. Item and Message Upload for Emergency
5. Output and Piloting
- (1)
- Users provide and continuously revise location-based data of exposed people, harmonized with the local registry office and essential for rescue methods (e.g., “setting age range”, “people present”, “people with limited mobility”). Further contributions include crowd reports of damages and infrastructure, including position details (e.g., “outside the building”), typology (e.g., “electricity supplies”, “flooded basement”), and people visibly involved, linked with compulsory photos. Another screen allows marking water level, and measuring the height of water from the ground, confirming it with compulsory photos. The rescue service obtains a water-level chart, automatically updated on the dashboard, and it instantaneously compares date, time, and water height.
- (2)
- Users are trained in personal preparedness in case of flooding as they participate as “citizen scientists” during these events. They collect data relevant for support (e.g., external contacts chosen and required to a proper phonebook), while a list of useful contacts in case of emergency is voluntarily empty during the first profile access, but organized and listed (e.g., “ambulance service”, “local fire”, “electrician”). Users can update and modify the list according to their experiences, gained during participation and involvement in past experiences [33]. These advances are visible within the dashboard. Furthermore, the screens for flood equipment present drop-down menus and cascade lists organized with home screens and widgets that are rich in content. The protection measures present short and practical lists of instruments granted by local rescue services (e.g., “flood boards”, “plastic covers”, “water pump”, “drain sealers”). Each measure has a user-friendly description for efficacy, and to illustrate their limits. Citizens profit from the mobile application by maintaining their vigilance as recruited and retained participants through their involvement during a crisis and possibly through the reputation acquired by sharing their knowledge [34]. The preparedness measures include various items that are selected by users, the choice of which uploads its plan, skipping to next screen. The module looks like a geoaware tool for lifesaving [35] to alert citizens previously trained and engaged in piloting.
- (3)
- Users have access to a warning map screen crossing basic Google Map with their own geolocation dot. The “warning” service is active and able to import an external data source.
6. System Design
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kellens, W.; Terpstra, T.; De Maeyer, P. Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Risk Anal. 2013, 33, 24–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Johnson, C.L.; Priest, S.J. Flood Risk Management in England: A Changing Landscape of Risk Responsibility? Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fienen, M.N.; Lowry, C.S. Social. Water—A crowdsourcing tool for environmental data acquisition. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 49, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, J.; Kocsis, D.; Tripathi, A.; Tarrell, A.; Weerakoon, A.; Tahmasbi, N.; Xiong, J.; Deng, W.; Oh, O.; de Vreede, G.-J. Conceptual Foundations of Crowdsourcing: A Review of IS Research. In Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2013; pp. 579–588. [Google Scholar]
- Sievers, J.A. Embracing Crowdsourcing. State Local Gov. Rev. 2015, 47, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabanillas, C. Exploring Human Resource Management in Crowdsourcing Platforms; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 113–128. [Google Scholar]
- Machado, L.; Kroll, J.; Prikladnicki, R.; de Souza, C.R.B.; Carmel, E. Software Crowdsourcing Challenges in the Brazilian IT Industry. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Rome, Italy, 25–28 April 2016; pp. 482–489. [Google Scholar]
- UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarianism in the Network Age; UN OCHA Policy Stud. Ser.; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
- Ernst, C.; Mladenow, A.; Strauss, C. Collaboration and crowdsourcing in emergency management. Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun. 2017, 13, 176–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granell, C.; Ostermann, F.O. Beyond data collection: Objectives and methods of research using VGI and geo-social media for disaster management. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2016, 59, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowry, C.S.; Fienen, M.N. CrowdHydrology: Crowdsourcing Hydrologic Data and Engaging Citizen Scientists. Ground Water 2013, 51, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meek, S.; Priestnall, G.; Sharples, M.; Goulding, J. Mobile capture of remote points of interest using line of sight modelling. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 52, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Quesenbery, W. Dimensions of Usability. Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication; Albers, M.J., Mazur, B., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Coppini, G.; Marra, P.; Lecci, R.; Pinardi, N.; Cretì, S.; Scalas, M.; Tedesco, L.; DAnca, A.; Fazioli, L.; Olita, A.; et al. SeaConditions: A web and mobile service for safer professional and recreational activities in the Mediterranean Sea. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 17, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcus, A.; Armitage, J.; Frank, V.; Thompson, A.; Tien, P.; Marcus, M.A. Lecture Notes for Tutorial: Graphic Design for Usable User Interfaces; Aaron Marcus and Associates, Inc.: Emeryville, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Galitz, W.O. The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Beck, D.M.; Palmer, S.E. Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2002, 28, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, Y. Icons at the interface: Their usefulness. Interact. Comput. 1989, 1, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peace, C.; Pincek, D. The Extron Guide to Graphical User Interface Design Standards Guide; Extron Electronics: Anaheim, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Y.T.; Shiu, Y.S.; Lu, P. City Probe: The Crowdsourcing Platform Driven by Citizen-Based Sensing for Spatial Identification and Assessment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 69–76. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.; Suh, J.; Park, H. Smart Compass-Clinometer: A smartphone application for easy and rapid geological site investigation. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 61, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, Y.-H.; Sun, F.-S.; Grigsby, J.D. GeoTools: An android phone application in geology. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 44, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Two Hurricanes Stressed Danish Grids in 2013. Available online: http://ing.dk/artikel/energinetdk-vi-skal-sikre-elforsyningen-ikke-redde-kraftvaerker-172366 (accessed on 7 August 2018).
- The Global Risks Report 2016 11th Edition Insight Report. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GRR/WEF_GRR16.pdf (accessed on 7 August 2018).
- Douvinet, J.; Kouadio, J.; Bonnet, E.; Gensel, J. Crowdsourcing and crisis-mapping in the event of floods: Tools and challenges. In Floods 2: Risk Management; Vinet, F., Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2017; pp. 209–223. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Kaplan, L.; Abdelzaher, T.F. Maximum likelihood analysis of conflicting observations in social sensing. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2014, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kietzmann, J.H. Crowdsourcing: A revised definition and introduction to new research. Bus. Horiz. 2017, 60, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haworth, B. Emergency management perspectives on volunteered geographic information: Opportunities, challenges and change. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2016, 57, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aulov, O.; Halem, M. Human Sensor Networks for Improved Modeling of Natural Disasters. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100, 2812–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Brito Moreira, R.; Degrossi, L.C.; de Albuquerque, J.P. An experimental evaluation of a crowdsourcing-based approach for flood risk management. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Experimental Software Engineering (ESELAW), Lima, Peru, 22–24 April 2015; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Minh, Q.T.; Chi, T.N.; Toulouse, M. Toward a Crowdsourcing-Based Urban Flood Mitigation Platform. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, Nha Trang City, Vietnam, 7–8 December 2017; pp. 301–308. [Google Scholar]
- See, L.; Mooney, P.; Foody, G.; Bastin, L.; Comber, A.; Estima, J.; Fritz, S.; Kerle, N.; Jiang, B.; Laakso, M.; et al. Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulemeka, O. Teaching disaster preparedness via a mobile device: A study of Auckland Civil Defence’s Smartphone Application. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2015, 3, 4555–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olson, D.L.; Rosacker, K. Crowdsourcing and open source software participation. Serv. Bus. 2013, 7, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamel Boulos, M.N.; Resch, B.; Crowley, D.N.; Breslin, J.G.; Sohn, G.; Burtner, R.; Pike, W.A.; Jezierski, E.; Chuang, K.-Y. Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: Trends, OGC standards and application examples. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2011, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frigerio, S.; Schenato, L.; Bossi, G. Crowdsourcing with mobile techniques for crisis support. PeerJ Prepr. 2016, 4, e2274v2. [Google Scholar]
- The Linux Kernel Archives. Available online: https://www.kernel.org/ (accessed on 7 August 2018).
- Gartner Says Five of Top 10 Worldwide Mobile Phone Vendors Increased Sales in Second Quarter of 2016. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3415117 (accessed on 7 August 2018).
- Horita, F.E.A.; de Albuquerque, J.P.; Degrossi, L.C.; Mendiondo, E.M.; Ueyama, J. Development of a spatial decision support system for flood risk management in Brazil that combines volunteered geographic information with wireless sensor networks. Comput. Geosci. 2015, 80, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Terpstra, T.; Gutteling, J.M. Households’ Perceived Responsibilities in Flood Risk Management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frigerio, S.; Schenato, L.; Bossi, G.; Cavalli, M.; Mantovani, M.; Marcato, G.; Pasuto, A. A web-based platform for automatic and continuous landslide monitoring: The Rotolon (Eastern Italian Alps) case study. Comput. Geosci. 2014, 63, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schade, S.; Díaz, L.; Ostermann, F.; Spinsanti, L.; Luraschi, G.; Cox, S.; Nuñez, M.; De Longueville, B. Citizen-based sensing of crisis events: Sensor web enablement for volunteered geographic information. Appl. Geomat. 2013, 5, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin-Ye, J.; García-León, M.; Gràcia, V.; Ortego, M.I.; Lionello, P.; Sánchez-Arcilla, A. Multivariate statistical modelling of future marine storms. Appl. Ocean Res. 2017, 65, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mantas, V.M.; Liu, Z.; Pereira, A.J.S.C. A web service and android application for the distribution of rainfall estimates and Earth observation data. Comput. Geosci. 2015, 77, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirth, M.; Hoßfeld, T.; Tran-Gia, P. Analyzing costs and accuracy of validation mechanisms for crowdsourcing platforms. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2918–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Screen Text | Data Type | Pilot Records |
---|---|---|
MAppERS-C (MC) | ||
Participation | Crowdsourcing Participation | 22 |
Exposed Elements | Crowdsourcing Exposed Elements | 15 |
Damages | Crowdsourcing Damages | 72 |
Water Level | Crowdsourcing Water Level | 45 |
Basic Info | Save Family | 25 |
Basic Info | Save External Contacts | 25 |
Useful Numbers | Save Useful Numbers | 25 |
Flood Equipment | Save Flood Equipment | 25 |
Warning Codes | Save Warning Codes | 21 |
Awareness | Save Awareness | 25 |
Insurance Cover | Save Insurance Cover | 25 |
MAppERS-V (MV) | ||
Danger | Danger | 113 |
Hazards | Hazards | 100 |
Facilities | Facilities | 56 |
Database Structure | ||
---|---|---|
Table | Table Content | Web Service (with JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Format) |
Login | Login Email Address | Registration Login Forgot Password |
Password | ||
User Type | ||
Verified User | ||
Crowdsourcing Participation | Name | Crowdsourcing Participation |
Surname | ||
Mobile Number | ||
Crowdsourcing Exposed Elements | Address | Crowdsourcing Exposed Elements |
Number of Residents | ||
Age Range Min | ||
Age Range Max | ||
Limited Mobility | ||
Elderly People | ||
Crowdsourcing Damages | Type of View | Crowdsourcing Damages Crowdsourcing Image Upload |
Type of Damage | ||
People Involved | ||
Image URL | ||
Date Time | ||
Crowdsourcing Water Level | Water Height | Crowdsourcing Water Level |
Image URL | ||
Date Time | ||
Save Family | Family Member | Flood Plan |
Submit Family | Family Member | |
Save External Contacts | External Contact | |
Submit External Contacts | External Contact | |
Save Useful Numbers | Useful Numbers | |
Submit Useful Numbers | Useful Numbers | |
Save Flood Equipment | Flood Equipment | |
Submit Flood Equipment | Flood Equipment | |
Save Insurance Cover | Insurance Cover | |
Submit Insurance Cover | Insurance Cover | |
Save Turn Off Supplier | Turn Off Supplier | |
Submit Turn Off Supplier | Turn Off Supplier | |
Save Warning Codes | Warning Codes | |
Submit Warning Codes | Warning Codes | |
User Location | Latitude | |
Longitude | ||
Danger | Danger Status | Danger |
Danger Visibility | ||
Date Time | ||
Hazards | Typology | Hazards |
Hazard Sources | ||
Accident Type | ||
Material State | ||
Material Typology | ||
Spill State | ||
Oil Level | ||
Explosion Type | ||
Date Time | ||
Facilities | Typology | Facilities |
Number | ||
Type Of Building | ||
Ground Type | ||
Vehicle Type | ||
Date Time |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Frigerio, S.; Schenato, L.; Bossi, G.; Mantovani, M.; Marcato, G.; Pasuto, A. Hands-On Experience of Crowdsourcing for Flood Risks. An Android Mobile Application Tested in Frederikssund, Denmark. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091926
Frigerio S, Schenato L, Bossi G, Mantovani M, Marcato G, Pasuto A. Hands-On Experience of Crowdsourcing for Flood Risks. An Android Mobile Application Tested in Frederikssund, Denmark. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(9):1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091926
Chicago/Turabian StyleFrigerio, Simone, Luca Schenato, Giulia Bossi, Matteo Mantovani, Gianluca Marcato, and Alessandro Pasuto. 2018. "Hands-On Experience of Crowdsourcing for Flood Risks. An Android Mobile Application Tested in Frederikssund, Denmark" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 9: 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091926
APA StyleFrigerio, S., Schenato, L., Bossi, G., Mantovani, M., Marcato, G., & Pasuto, A. (2018). Hands-On Experience of Crowdsourcing for Flood Risks. An Android Mobile Application Tested in Frederikssund, Denmark. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091926