Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Collection and Methodology
3. Results
3.1. Conjoint Analysis
3.2. Frequency Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Di Vita, G.; Bracco, S.; D’Amico, M. Mapping the italian cured meats’attributes: A qualitative approach. Qual.-Access Success 2017, 18, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
- Xazela, N.M.; Hugo, A.; Marume, U.; Muchenje, V. Perceptions of rural consumers on the aspects of meat quality and health implications associated with meat consumption. Sustainability 2017, 9, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Sabate, R.; Sabaté, J.; Sanchez-Sabate, R.; Sabaté, J. Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Massaglia, S.; Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D. Marketing strategies for animal welfare meat identification: Comparison of preferences between millennial and conventional consumers. Qual.-Access Success 2018, 19, 305–311. [Google Scholar]
- Mancuso, T.; Verduna, T.; Blanc, S.; Di Vita, G.; Brun, F. Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheat. Agric. Econ. 2019, 65, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Menyanu, E.; Russell, J.; Charlton, K.; Menyanu, E.; Russell, J.; Charlton, K. Dietary Sources of Salt in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sparks, E.; Paterson, K.; Santos, J.; Trieu, K.; Hinge, N.; Tarivonda, L.; Snowdon, W.; Johnson, C.; Webster, J.; Sparks, E.; et al. Salt-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors on Efate Island, Vanuatu. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toldrá, F.; Reig, M. Innovations for healthier processed meats. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, B.M.; Gremaud, G.; Hadorn, R.; Kreuzer, M. Geographic origin of meat-elements of an analytical approach to its authentication. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Lee, J. Application of Sensory Descriptive Analysis and Consumer Studies to Investigate Traditional and Authentic Foods: A Review. Foods 2019, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, M.L.; Umberger, W.J. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2003, 28, 287–301. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, K.H.; Hu, W.; Maynard, L.J.; Goddard, E.U.S. Consumers’ Preference and Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin-Labeled Beef Steak and Food Safety Enhancements. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 61, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hersleth, M.; Næs, T.; Rødbotten, M.; Lind, V.; Monteleone, E. Lamb meat-Importance of origin and grazing system for italian and norwegian consumers. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conter, M.; Zanardi, E.; Ghidini, S.; Pennisi, L.; Vergara, A.; Campanini, G.; Ianieri, A. Consumers’ behaviour toward typical Italian dry sausages. Food Control 2008, 19, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balogh, P.; Békési, D.; Gorton, M.; Popp, J.; Lengyel, P. Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products. Food Policy 2016, 61, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iaccarino, T.; Di Monaco, R.; Mincione, A.; Cavella, S.; Masi, P. Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response: The case of soppressata salami. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006, 17, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Platania, M.; Privitera, D. Typical products and consumer preferences: The “soppressata” case. Br. Food J. 2006, 108, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Almeida, M.; Montes, N.; Saldaña, E.; Pinto, J.; Contreras-Castillo, C.J. Are sensory attributes and acceptance influenced by nutritional and health claims of low-sodium salami? Preliminary study with Brazilian consumers. Sci. Agropecu. 2017, 8, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzone, L.; Di Vita, G.; Borla, S.; D’Amico, M. When Consumers and Products Come from the Same Place: Preferences and WTP for Geographical Indication Differ across Regional Identity Groups. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2016, 28, 286–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Massaglia, S.; Borra, D. Analysis of european consumer awareness for identifying animal-friendly meat. Qual.-Access Success 2019, 20, 388–395. [Google Scholar]
- Di Vita, G.; D’Amico, M.; Lombardi, A.; Pecorino, B. Evaluating trends of low sodium content in food: The willingness to pay for salt-reduced bread, a case study. Agric. Econ. Rev. 2016, 17, 82–99. [Google Scholar]
- Torquati, B.; Tempesta, T.; Vecchiato, D.; Venanzi, S. Tasty or sustainable? The effect of product sensory experience on a sustainable new food product: An application of discrete choice experiments on Chianina tinned beef. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Bogue, J. Concept optimisation of fermented functional cereal beverages. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 541–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, D.N.; Evans, G.; Lease, H.J. The influence of product attributes, consumer attitudes and characteristics on the acceptance of: (1) Novel bread and milk, and dietary supplements and (2) fish and novel meats as dietary vehicles of long chain omega 3 fatty acids. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, L.C.; De Brún, A.; Henchion, M.; Li, C.; Murrin, C.; Wall, P.G.; Monahan, F.J. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier—A conjoint analysis study. Meat Sci. 2017, 131, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sebranek, J.G.; Bacus, J.N. Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inguglia, E.S.; Zhang, Z.; Tiwari, B.K.; Kerry, J.P.; Burgess, C.M. Salt reduction strategies in processed meat products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 59, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guàrdia, M.D.; Guerrero, L.; Gelabert, J.; Gou, P.; Arnau, J. Consumer attitude towards sodium reduction in meat products and acceptability of fermented sausages with reduced sodium content. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Vita, G.; Blanc, S.; Brun, F.; Bracco, S.; D’Amico, M. Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: Exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham. Meat Sci. 2019, 155, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lingua, F.; Mosso, A.; Brun, F.; Blanc, S. A Survey of Innovative Training Preferences Among Italian Loggers. Small-Scale For. 2019, 18, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundros, J.; Clifford, D.; Silliman, K.; Neyman Morris, M. Prevalence of Orthorexia nervosa among college students based on Bratman’s test and associated tendencies. Appetite 2016, 101, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loureiro, M.L.; Umberger, W.J. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 2007, 32, 496–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caracciolo, F.; D’Amico, M.; Di Vita, G.; Pomarici, E.; Bianco, A.D.; Cembalo, L. Private vs. collective wine reputation. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2016, 19, 191–210. [Google Scholar]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Verduna, T.; Massaglia, S. Household behavior with respect to meat consumption: Differences between households with and without children. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pires, M.A.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Baldin, J.C.; Rocha, Y.J.P.; Carvalho, L.T.; Dos Santos, I.R.; Barros, J.C.; Trindade, M.A. The effect of sodium reduction on the microstructure, texture and sensory acceptance of Bologna sausage. Food Struct. 2017, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, Y.; Verbeke, W.; De Kok, T.M. Stakeholder and consumer reactions towards innovative processed meat products: Insights from a qualitative study about nitrite reduction and phytochemical addition. Food Control. 2016, 60, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Girgenti, V.; Dal Vecchio, A.; Massaglia, S. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannata, S.; Ratti, S.; Meteau, K.; Mourot, J.; Baldini, P.; Corino, C. Evaluation of different types of dry-cured ham by Italian and French consumers. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureati, M.; Buratti, S.; Giovanelli, G.; Corazzin, M.; Lo Fiego, D.P.; Pagliarini, E. Characterization and differentiation of Italian Parma, San Daniele and Toscano dry-cured hams: A multi-disciplinary approach. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappalardo, G.; Di Vita, G.; La Via, G.; Romano, S.; Vastola, A.; Cozzi, M.; D’Amico, M. Exploring gender differences in the Italian traditional pizza consumption. Econ. Agro-Aliment. 2019, 21, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suki, N.M. Young consumer ecological behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, healthy food, and healthy way of life with the moderation of gender and age. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2013, 24, 726–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Vita, G.; Pappalardo, G.; Chinnici, G.; La Via, G.; D’Amico, M. Not everything has been still explored: Further thoughts on additional price for the organic wine. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merlino, V.M.; Borra, D.; Lazzarino, L.L.; Blanc, S. Does the organic certification influence the purchasing decisions of milk consumers? Qual.-Access Success 2019, 20, 382–387. [Google Scholar]
- De Boer, M.; McCarthy, M.; Cowan, C.; Ryan, I. The influence of lifestyle characteristics and beliefs about convenience food on the demand for convenience foods in the Irish market. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Option | Price (€ hg−1) | Low-Salt Content | Presence of Nitrites | National Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.90 | Yes | No | Yes |
2 | 1.30 | Yes | Yes | No |
3 | 3.00 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
4 | 1.90 | No | Yes | No |
5 | 3.00 | No | No | No |
6 | 1.30 | No | No | Yes |
7 | 3.00 | No | Yes | Yes |
8 | 3.00 | Yes | No | No |
Average Importance | Factor | Level | Utility |
---|---|---|---|
43.59% | Price (€/hg) | 1.30 | −0.7929 |
1.90 | 0.2250 | ||
3.00 | 0.5679 | ||
25.96% | Low-salt content | No | −0.4051 |
Yes | 0.4051 | ||
16.40% | Presence of nitrites | Yes | −0.2559 |
No | 0.2559 | ||
14.06% | Origin | Yes | 0.2194 |
No | −0.2194 | ||
Pearson’s R = 0.850 | |||
Kendall’s tau = 0.500 |
Variable | “0” | +10% | +20% | +30% | +50% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||
Gender | Male | 24.7 | 17.5 | 47.5 | 8.7 | 1.5 |
Female | 44.9 | 24.8 | 22.6 | 6.0 | 1.7 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 22,221 | |||||
p value | 0.000 | |||||
Age | 18–29 | 33.7 | 18.7 | 37.4 | 9.6 | 0.5 |
30–39 | 43.7 | 15.5 | 33.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
≥40 | 26.8 | 28.0 | 35.7 | 8.3 | 1.2 | |
Kruskal-Wallis H | 3.135 | |||||
p value | 0.209 | |||||
Sports | No | 35.5 | 24.7 | 32.3 | 6.1 | 1.4 |
Yes | 32.6 | 16.1 | 40.4 | 9.2 | 1.8 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 27,453 | |||||
p value | 0.050 |
Variable | “0” | +10% | +20% | +30% | +50% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||
Gender | Male | 22.4 | 43.0 | 23.2 | 9.1 | 2.3 |
Female | 17.0 | 23.4 | 55.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 25,480 | |||||
p value | 0.000 | |||||
Age | 18–29 | 17.1 | 33.2 | 38.5 | 10.2 | 1.1 |
30–39 | 27.5 | 25.4 | 39.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | |
≥40 | 16.6 | 41.4 | 37.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | |
Kruskal-Wallis H | 3.617 | |||||
p value | 0.164 | |||||
Sport | No | 24.6 | 33.9 | 35.7 | 4.3 | 1.4 |
Yes | 13.8 | 33.5 | 42.2 | 7.8 | 2.8 | |
Mann-Whitney U | 25,555 | |||||
p value | 0.001 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Di Vita, G.; Blanc, S.; Mancuso, T.; Massaglia, S.; La Via, G.; D’Amico, M. Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
Di Vita G, Blanc S, Mancuso T, Massaglia S, La Via G, D’Amico M. Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(14):2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
Chicago/Turabian StyleDi Vita, Giuseppe, Simone Blanc, Teresina Mancuso, Stefano Massaglia, Giovanni La Via, and Mario D’Amico. 2019. "Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 14: 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605
APA StyleDi Vita, G., Blanc, S., Mancuso, T., Massaglia, S., La Via, G., & D’Amico, M. (2019). Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142605