Next Article in Journal
Integrated Impact Assessment of Active Travel: Expanding the Scope of the Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for Walking and Cycling
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Impacting Risk Perception under Typhoon Disaster in Macao SAR, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 20
10.3390/ijerph17207360
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tobacco Use and Parental Monitoring—Observations from Three Diverse Island Nations—Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor

by
Masood Ali Shaikh
1,
Zahra Zare
1,
Kwok W. Ng
2,3,
Karen L. Celedonia
1 and
Michael Lowery Wilson
1,4,*
1
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention Research Group, Turku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
2
School of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
3
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
4
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7360; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207360
Submission received: 14 August 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 27 September 2020 / Published: 9 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tobacco use among adolescents is a global problem of public health importance. This study examined the profile of differences and similarities in adolescent tobacco use, and the role of parental monitoring activities among adolescents in three island nations of varying economic status: Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor. Using nationally representative data we conducted regression modeling to determine the effect of four types of parental monitoring activities on tobacco use. Within a recall period of 30 days prior to being surveyed, 29.7% of students in East Timor, 21.6% in Cook Islands, and 13.1% in Curaçao reported having smoked cigarettes and/or used tobacco in other forms during 1 or more days during the preceding 30 days. Lower rates of parental monitoring as measured by four variables (parental understanding of problems and worries; knowing about how free time was being spent; going over things without approval; and checking to see if homework was done) were associated with higher percentages of adolescent tobacco use. Taken together the results underscore the need for increased parental involvement in programs which are designed to reduce tobacco use among adolescents.

1. Introduction

The consequences of tobacco use on health have been clearly communicated by many scientific authorities. The misuse and abuse of tobacco, alcohol, and other substances account for long-term consequences for both physical and mental health [1,2,3]. Approximately 6 million lives are lost worldwide due to tobacco-related diseases every year [4]. Tobacco use remains as a major public health concern, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). LMICs account for more than 80% of the world’s smokers and are where 5.81 million deaths occurred in 2013 as a result of smoking [5,6,7]. According to a World Health Organisation (WHO) global report, the prevalence of tobacco use has decreased faster in high-income countries relative to LMICs. In addition, the numbers of smokers in LMICs have steadily risen since 2000 [8]. Global surveys have demonstrated that approximately 90% of smokers start smoking tobacco when they are less than 18 years of age, with about 24 million of these early smokers being (about 7%) of adolescent age (13–15 years) between 2000–2017 [8,9]. Moreover, based on US national data, about 2.2% of middle- (12–13 years old) and 8% of high-school (14–18 years old) youth are current cigarette smokers [10].
Early experimentation and initiation of substance use is assumed to be a robust predictor of the problems of substance use later in life [11,12,13]. Smoking during early adolescence leads to dependence and continued use in adulthood because of the strongly addictive nature of tobacco [14,15]. Furthermore, the use of tobacco and other drugs before mid-adolescence leads to major health risks, psychiatric disorders, delinquency, antisocial behavior and later substance use behaviors [16,17,18].
According to a study of 68 LMIC countries, the mean prevalence of exposure to second-hand smoke in young adolescents was 55.9% and it remains a major public health problem. Second-hand smoking is significantly associated with an increased susceptibility for tobacco use in young adolescents [19,20]. Several factors might be related to this association. First, second-hand smoke exposure may be an indicator of social cues from peers, siblings, teachers or parents prompting smoking initiation. Second, neural pathways might be activated by nicotine exposure from second-hand smoke. Neural pathways lead to increase in the brain’s sensitivity to nicotine and gives rise to the willingness to smoke [20].
Several studies have presented empirical data on psychological, biological and sociodemographic factors as being highly associated with adolescent smoking behavior. Some of these are self-esteem, pubertal status, parental monitoring, peer smoking, gender, race/ethnicity, parent smoking, and the availability of cigarettes [21,22,23,24]. Parental monitoring is one family-related factor that has consistently been related to substance use behavior [25,26]. Existing literature suggests that family behavior is partly responsible for adolescent substance use and also this same process may be implicated in modifying the impacts of smoking related behaviors among adolescents [25,27,28].
Parental monitoring is perceived as a protective factor against substance use behavior [29]. In addition, studies confirm that even in diverse samples [30] with populations being at high-risk for smoking debut, less use was predicted due to increased parental monitoring [31,32,33]. In this regard, being closely monitored by a parent influences cognition and behaviors related to tobacco use among adolescents. According to the findings of these studies, willingness and initiation to smoking are the factors that decline as a result of increased parental monitoring [34,35].
Adolescence is a transitional period when children make the transition from primary to secondary school, and from pre- adolescence to adolescence. During early adolescence some of the most influential changes occur in the relationship between parents and their children. On the other hand, during this period, adolescents gravitate to their peers more and monitoring by parents has a tendency to decrease [36]. Consequently, adolescents are faced with increased risk for substance use [36,37,38]. However, despite the acknowledged effect of peers with regard to substance use behaviors, research has shown that this effect can be attenuated via parental monitoring even during the transition period.
In this study, the protective effects of parental monitoring were supported based on several reasons—a close relationship between parent and child decreases deviancy because the child’s identification is primarily with that of the parents and their value systems which define the attitudes and behaviors of the child. Therefore, children who use substances or even have a tendency to use and receive average levels of parental monitoring may be prevented from associating with deviant peers who do [39,40].
Regarding the role of strict parenting, findings from a study conducted to assess the relationship between parenting styles and adolescent substance use demonstrated that levels of substance use among adolescents having parents with authoritative (characterized by warmth and strictness) and indulgent (characterized by warmth but not strictness) parenting styles were less than among those having parents with authoritative and neglectful (characterized by neither warmth nor strictness) parenting styles. While, according to other studies, the highest level of tobacco and illegal substance use were associated with the neglectful and authoritative parenting style [41].
In order to reduce the effect of tobacco-related illnesses on both tobacco users and non-tobacco users, a 30% relative reduction in the global prevalence of tobacco smoking will be required as a global target. Therefore, in the present study, we compare 3 island nations which are from different world regions with diverse economic statuses and in terms of characteristics of adolescent tobacco use and parental monitoring.
According to a global youth tobacco survey, smoking in East Timor is a serious problem. East Timor is facing a rapidly growing epidemic of tobacco use especially among adolescents. Compared to other countries in the same Asia Pacific Region, the prevalence (51%) of current smokers among young people is significantly higher in East Timor. Findings of this study revealed that factors such as closed-peer smoking, parental smoking, having family discussion about harmful effects of smoking, having seen cigarette advertisements, smoking being allowed in areas such as schools, public places and home; and number of days people smoked in the home was significantly associated with current smoking [42]. On the other hand, unavailability of restrictive laws and regulations were clearly related to the continuously rising trend of smoking among adolescents in East Timor [43].
Also, according to global health survey, onset of tobacco use before reaching to adulthood among smokers is common in Cook Islands so that nearly one-quarter of those young smokers started smoking for the first time before the age of ten. Overall, 21.1% and 22.5% of students smoked cigarettes and any tobacco on one or more days during the past 30 days in Cook Islands, respectively. Most (84.4%) of these students first tried a cigarette before age 14 years. Moreover, it was reported that people smoked in the presence of 70.2% of these students on one or more days during the seven days preceding being surveyed and that parents or guardians (40.2%) used some form of tobacco [44].
The proportion of students in Curaçao who reported smoking was lower than compared to the average of Caribbean students and also they reported an early onset of substance use (before age 14) less than 13-to 15-year old students smoked. Overall, in Curaçao, the proportion of students who currently smoked cigarettes on at least one day during the 30 days before the survey was 9.0%. Among these students who ever smoked cigarettes, 60.5% of them tried a cigarette before the age of 14. Among Curaçao students, nevertheless, the proportion of smoking before the age of 14 reduced with age, which may be because of consumption of smoking among older students [45].
Despite the increase in available data, there still remains insufficient information to make robust estimates of tobacco use among adolescents, particularly in economically-diverse regions [8]. In addition, determining factors which modify smoking behavior during adolescence is of paramount importance to reduce longer term health consequences [35]. Therefore, the present study was conducted to assess and profile differences and similarities in adolescent tobacco use, and the role of parental monitoring activities among school-attending adolescents in three relatively unstudied island nations from three different WHO regions.

2. Methods

2.1. Sample

Inspired by previous research [26], data from the 2015 Cook Islands, 2015, Curaçao, and 2015 East Timor Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) were used for secondary analysis. The GSHS were developed by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and conducted in collaboration with the national ministries of health, in each country. Detailed information on the data collection methods, questionnaire, procedures, and data are available at CDC website (http://www.cdc.gov/gshs/). Briefly, a two-stage cluster sampling design were used to facilitate collection of data representing students in years/classes 8 to 13 in Cook Islands, grade 1 to 6 in Curaçao, and class/grade 7 to 11 in East Timor.
At stage one, schools were selected with a probability proportional to their enrollment size. At stage two, classrooms within the selected schools were randomly selected and all students in selected classes were eligible to participate. The school response rate was 100%, student response rate was 65%, overall response rate was 65%, and 701 students participated in Cook Islands; school response rate was 96%, student response rate was 86%, overall response rate was 83%, and 2765 students participated in Curaçao; while school response rate was 100%, student response rate was 79%, overall response rate was 79%, and 3704 students participated in East Timor.
In all three countries, the class/grade levels were selected which are typically attended by students in the age range of 13 to 17 years. All respondent 13 years old or younger were recoded as 13 years old in Cook Islands; 12 years and younger as 12 years old; and 11 years or younger as 11 years old in East Timor, owing to their small number. While respondents 18 years or older were initially coded at 18 year olds. Participation in the survey was voluntary and all students were informed of the anonymous nature of the questionnaire. Answers were self-reported on a questionnaire with computer scannable answer sheet. With the exception of verifying heights and weights, no validation measures were used for the other responses in the survey, including the responses to items used for the present study.

2.2. Measurements

Current tobacco use as dependent variable was derived from two questions in the GSHS: “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you smoke cigarettes?” and “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use any tobacco products other than cigarettes, such as . . .”; in each of the three countries different types of non-cigarette tobacco products were named. Response options for both questions were the same and ranged from “0 days”, “1 or 2 days”, “3 to 5 days”, “6 to 9 days”, “10 to 19 days”, “20 to 29 days”, or “All 30 days”. For the purpose of this analyses, participants were classified as current tobacco user, if they either reported having smoked a cigarette or used any tobacco product for 1 or 2 days or more times in the past 30 days.
Four parental monitoring questions were investigated independently as explanatory variables: “During the past 30 days, how often did your parents or guardians check to see if your homework was done?”, “During the past 30 days, how often did your parents or guardians understand your problems and worries?”, During the past 30 days, how often did your parents or guardians really know what you were doing with your free time?, and “During the past 30 days, how often did your parents or guardians go through your things without your approval?”. Response options for all four questions were the same and ranged from “Never”, “Rarely”, “Sometimes”, “Most of the time”, or “Always”. Responses of ‘most of the time’ and ‘always’ were combined for each question and coded as ‘yes’ while other responses were coded as ‘not having a monitoring parent’.
Additional questions on age when first tried a cigarette, having ever tried to stop smoking during the past twelve months, number of days other people smoked in the respondents’ presence during the last seven days, and parental tobacco use variables were also investigated.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The prevalence and use of tobacco products, cigarette smoking, and other cigarette smoking related variables were examined first in terms of numbers and weighted percentages expressed as proportions. Differences between current tobacco use status and the various variables specified earlier were screened for statistical significance using Rao-Scott chi-square test, which is a design-adjusted version of Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables, and the design-adjusted version of t-test for continuous variable age. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
For each country, four survey binary logistic regression models were created to model the ability of each individual parental monitoring variable to predict its association with current tobacco use and not ’predict’ needs to be corrected. This was followed by inclusion of all four parental monitoring variables in separate binary logistic regression models for each country. The measures are reported as unadjusted odds ratios (OR), adjusted odds ratios(aOR), and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). All analyses were carried out using Stata 16 (StataCorp, 2019).

3. Results

Within the recall period of 30 days prior to survey, 21.6% (95% CI: 18.3–25.3) students in Cook Islands, 13.1% (95% CI: 11.2–15.4) in Curaçao, and 29.7% (95% CI: 27.0–32.5) in East Timor reported having smoked cigarette and/or used tobacco in other forms one or more days. In Cook Islands, age and sex was missing for 3 and 5 records, respectively; while for 2 records both were missing. In Curaçao, age and sex was missing for 10 and 27 records; while for 3 records both were missing. And for East Timor, age and sex was missing for 74 and 202 records, respectively; while for 57 records both were missing.
Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of tobacco use, smoking use and related questions in school attending adolescents in the Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor. The proportion (percentage) of current cigarette smokers was 20.0%, and current tobacco users was 15.3% in Cook Islands; 9.0% and 7.7%, respectively for current cigarette smokers and tobacco users in Curaçao; and 22.8% for current cigarette smokers and 18.7% for current tobacco users in East Timor. Regarding people having smoked in the presence of respondents during the past seven days, for one or more days, 68.0% replied affirmatively in Cook Islands, 58.3% in Curaçao, and 79.7% in East Timor.
Table 2 presents the descriptive statistics and bivariate associations by current tobacco use status (smoked cigarette and/or used tobacco) in school attending adolescents in the three countries. Among tobacco users, 54.4% were males in Cook Islands, 57.7% in Curaçao, and 73.0% in East Timor. Statistically significant associations were found between gender and current tobacco use in Curaçao and East Timor only. Age and current tobacco use was also statistically significant in Curaçao and East Timor, with older students more likely to report tobacco use in any form. Albeit, this association was not statistically significant in Cook Islands.
Regarding parental monitoring variables; statistically significant bivariate associations were found between understanding of problems and worries by the parents in Curaçao, parents really knowing what was being done with free time in Cook Islands and Curaçao, and parents checking to see if homework was done in Curaçao and East Timor; with lower percentages of such monitoring activities in current tobacco users. For parents who went over respondent’s things without their approval, lower percentages were reported in all three countries by the current tobacco users. However statistically significant association was found in Curaçao and East Timor, but not in Cook Islands.
Table 3 presents the results of simple and multiple logistic regression modeling analysis of current tobacco use and parental monitoring activities among school attending adolescents in three countries. Odds ratio (OR) based on simple logistic regression models in each country were statistically significant, for the associations between current tobacco use and understanding of problems and worries by the parents in Curaçao, parents really knowing what was being done with free time in Cook Islands and Curaçao, and parents checking to see if homework was done in Curaçao and East Timor; with ORs lower than one that is, parental monitoring behaviors bestowed protection from tobacco use. Association between current tobacco use and parental activity of going over respondents’ things without their approval was statistically significant and above one in Curaçao and East Timor, with lower percentages of such monitoring activities in current tobacco users.
When adjusting for all covariates in the multiple logistic regression model, association of current tobacco use and understanding of problems and worries by the parents was not statistically significant for any country. Other parental monitoring activities, where statistically significant, bestowed protection from current tobacco use. However, with the exception of parents going over things without respondent’s approval; which was associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for current tobacco use. The goodness-of-fit test revealed that multivariate logistic regression models with parental monitoring covariates in all three countries were good models for tobacco use.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of adolescent tobacco use in three economically-diverse island nations and explore whether parental monitoring activities were associated with adolescent tobacco use among school-attending adolescents in these countries. This study revealed that within the recall period, 29.7% students in East Timor reported having smoked cigarette and/or used tobacco in other forms one or more days, which is a higher prevalence compared to Cook Islands and Curaçao, with 21.6% and 13.1%, respectively. The highest prevalence of tobacco smoking was previously reported to be in the South-East Asian Region within East Timor among young people (13–15 years old), and also that the prevalence of tobacco use was reported higher in LMICs (like East Timor) compared to high-income (Curaçao) and upper middle-income (Cook Islands) countries, which was consistent with our findings [8].
In this study, East Timor accounted for 22.8% for current cigarette smokers and 18.7% for current tobacco users, with Cook Islands and Curaçao having lower proportions, respectively. According to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS), East Timor had the highest median current tobacco smoking prevalence among students aged 13–15 years from 2012 to 2015 across 61 countries, with the prevalence of tobacco use and cigarette smoking being lowest in the European region [46]. In addition, according to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey on 45 countries (six WHO regions) in 2013 and 2014, East Timor had the highest median level of overall current cigarette smoking prevalence among students aged 13–15 years [47].
Regarding people having smoked in the presence of respondents during the seven days preceding being asked, for one or more days, 68.0% replied affirmatively in Cook Islands, 58.3% in Curaçao, and 79.7% in East Timor in the present study. As reported elsewhere, the highest prevalence of exposure to secondhand smoke globally was 63.5% in the western Pacific region [19].
Males were over-represented as being current tobacco users in each of the studied countries. This was generally consistent with prior research examining tobacco use among adolescents in these three settings [46,47]. However it contradicts findings in other world regions where females are generally perceived to have a higher predisposition toward smoking initiation and continuance [48]. It has also been suggested that girls might be more susceptible to the effects of prenatal exposure to smoking parents [49]. It is not entirely clear why smoking behavior differs in this regard by gender. It is fully possible that cultural norms around what might be expected of boys vs girls may attenuate smoking behavior among girls. There may also be social factors in risk perception by gender which might help to explain this variation [50]. Not only was proportion of current tobacco users among boys higher in all three countries, statistically significant associations were found between male gender and current tobacco use in Curaçao and East Timor.
East-Timor had the highest values in tobacco smoking generally. There may be some cultural undertones to this finding. A tradition of indicating appreciation by giving out free cigarettes in some communities in East-Timor may be one of the reasons why underage children may be more exposed to smoking initiation. Socioeconomic status is another potential reason. Selling loose cigarettes by under age children in order to earn money may decrease any existing social barriers around smoking initiation since the these children have access to cigarettes in some quantity. A third reason may result from the absence of legislation restricting cigarette sales and consumption by minors. Cigarettes are accessible in small shops and are affordable in East-Timor [42].
The first age for starting to smoke was 11 years old or less for East Timor, 12 years old or less for Curaçao, and 13 years old or less for Cook Islands. Different studies reported the first age when students tried to initiate smoking. In a study, conducted on islands of the pacific region, half of cigarette users tried smoking before age 14 for the first time [51]. According to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey, the first age for starting to smoke was before the age of 11 years among more than half of smokers in more than half of the countries that contributed to the GYTS [46].
With respect to parental monitoring activities, lower percentages of parental monitoring such as understanding of problems and worries, free time activities, checking homework, and went over things without approval was significantly associated with higher percentages of current tobacco use.
These results are congruent with previous research showing that parental monitoring having an influence on smoking-related cognition such as intentions and willingness - with decreased parental monitoring there was increased smoking initiation [34,35,52,53] The buffering effect of parental monitoring has been demonstrated by other studies, and it has been shown that the associations between tobacco use and peers with deviant behavior can be interrupted by parental monitoring during the transition from childhood to adolescence [32,39,54]. Consistent with previous research using the global-school-based student health survey (GSHS), which has showed parents’ lack of awareness of free time activities as a significant predictor of smoking, while parents who really knew what their children were doing during their free time was associated with less tobacco use [55].
In addition, according to other research, parental monitoring was targeted as a predictor for early onset of substance use among adolescents. Since youth spend more time with peers than parents during early adolescence, they may be exposed to peers who engage in substance use. Although adolescents are considerably influential in each others’ lives during adolescence, early initiation of substance use can be prevented by the protective role of parents such as monitoring children’s free time activities, who they are with and where they go [36,37,38]. In a longitudinal study, the protective role of parental monitoring against substance use was assessed in the 5th grade, and the results confirmed that using substances by youth in 9th grade was related to parental monitoring activities [56]. The study results presented here confirm other studies with regard to decreased use of substances resulted from increased monitoring activities across diverse population samples [30,31,32,33].
Some of the myriad activities that aid in reducing smoking and tobacco use behaviors among minors include: Encouraging stricter parenting behaviors via national prevention and educational programs; implementing national mass media campaigns and prevention programs; setting stricter policies at schools and stricter societal approaches toward adolescent tobacco use; changing socio-cultural norms regarding adolescent tobacco use; implementing bans on selling tobacco to minors; installing policies aimed at increasing physical activity and healthy eating among school children, and promoting positive changes in the way young people spend their leisure time have been widely recommended and are reiterated here [30,31,32,33].
Our findings should be considered within the limitations of the study. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, causal inference cannot be applied to the findings. Additionally, given that the survey data were self-reported, response bias may be present. Depending on the cultural acceptability of tobacco use in each of the respective countries, use may have either been under- or over-reported by youth. Response rates–and therefore, sample sizes–were not comparable across the three countries, which could have affected the analyses. Limitations aside, the present study provides useful data on adolescent tobacco use and parental monitoring in these three island nations, and adds to the growing body of literature on adolescent tobacco use epidemiology in LMICs.

5. Conclusions

The findings have implications for tobacco use prevention efforts in these countries and surrounding regions, suggesting that targeted public health initiatives designed to increase parental involvement in adolescents’ lives may help delay or entirely prevent the onset of tobacco use. More research needs to be done, however, to thoroughly understand the connection between tobacco use and parental monitoring in these countries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.S. and M.L.W.; methodology, M.A.S. and M.L.W.; validation, K.W.N., K.L.C. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, M.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, (All authors); writing—review and editing, (All authors). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Author M.L.W. was funded by a grant from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Bonn, Germany.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fergusson, D.M.; Boden, J.M. Cannabis use and later life outcomes. Addiction 2008, 103, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rooke, S.E.; Norberg, M.M.; Copeland, J.; Swift, W. Health outcomes associated with long-term regular cannabis and tobacco smoking. Addict. Behav. 2013, 38, 2207–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mathers, M.; Toumbourou, J.W.; Catalano, R.F.; Williams, J.; Patton, G.C. Consequences of youth tobacco use: A review of prospective behavioural studies. Addiction 2006, 101, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO. WHO Global Report on Mortality Attributable to Tobacco; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ng, M.; Freeman, M.K.; Fleming, T.D.; Robinson, M.; Dwyer-Lindgren, L.; Thomson, B.; Wollum, A.; Sanman, E.; Wulf, S.; Lopez, A.D.; et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012. JAMA 2014, 311, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Giovino, G.A.; Mirza, S.A.; Samet, J.M.; Gupta, P.C.; Jarvis, M.J.; Bhala, N.; Peto, R.; Zatonski, W.; Hsia, J.; Morton, J.; et al. Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: An analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys. Lancet 2012, 380, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bilano, V.; Gilmour, S.; Moffiet, T.; D’Espaignet, E.T.; Stevens, G.A.; Commar, A.; Tuyl, F.; Hudson, I.; Shibuya, K. Global trends and projections for tobacco use, 1990–2025: An analysis of smoking indicators from the WHO Comprehensive Information Systems for Tobacco Control. Lancet 2015, 385, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. WHO. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking 2000–2025; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mackay, J.; Eriksen, M.; Shafey, O. The Tobacco Atlas, 2nd ed.; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006; pp. 22–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jamal, A.; Gentzke, A.; Hu, S.S.; Cullen, K.A.; Apelberg, B.J.; Homa, D.M.; King, B.A. Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students-United States, 2011–2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Flory, K.; Lynam, D.; Milich, R.; Leukefeld, C.; Clayton, R. Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: Early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Dev. Psychopathol. 2004, 12, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Georgiades, K.; Boyle, M.H. Adolescent tobacco and cannabis use: Young adult outcomes from the Ontario Child Health Study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2007, 48, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tucker, J.S.; Ellickson, P.L.; Orlando, M.; Martino, S.C.; Klein, D.J. Substance use Trajectories from Early Adolescence to Emerging Adulthood: A Comparison of Smoking, Binge Drinking, and Marijuana use. J. Drug Issues 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Ryzin, M.J.; Dishion, T.J. Adolescent deviant peer clustering as an amplifying mechanism underlying the progression from early substance use to late adolescent dependence. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2014, 55, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Borracci, R.A.; Mulassi, A.H. Tobacco use during adolescence may predict smoking during adulthood: Simulation-based research. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2015, 113, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Anthony, J.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Storr, C.L. Drug dependence epidemiology. Clin. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 2, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. van Leeuwen, A.P.; Verhulst, F.C.; Reijneveld, S.A.; Vollebergh, W.A.M.; Ormel, J.; Huizink, A.C. Can the gateway hypothesis, the common liability model and/or, the route of administration model predict initiation of cannabis use during adolescence? A survival analysis–the TRAILS study. J. Adolesc. Health 2011, 48, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ellickson, P.L.; Tucker, J.S.; Klein, D.J. Ten-year prospective study of public health problems associated with early drinking. Pediatrics 2003, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xi, B.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, M.; Ma, C.; Bovet, P. Tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure in young adolescents aged 12–15 years: Data from 68 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob. Health 2016, 4, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Okoli, C.T.C.; Kodet, J. A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation. Addict. Behav. 2015, 47, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, P.; Jacobson, K.C. Developmental trajectories of substance use from early adolescence to young adulthood: Gender and racial/ethnic differences. J. Adolesc. Health 2012, 50, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chuang, Y.C.; Ennett, S.T.; Bauman, K.E.; Foshee, V.A. Neighborhood influences on adolescent cigarette and alcohol use: Mediating effects through parent and peer behaviors. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2005, 46, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stock, M.L.; Gibbons, F.X.; Gerrard, M.; Houlihan, A.E.; Weng, C.Y.; Lorenz, F.O.; Simons, R.L. Racial identification, racial composition, and substance use vulnerability among African American adolescents and young adults. Health Psychol. 2013, 32, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wills, T.A.; Bantum, E.O.; Pokhrel, P.; Maddock, J.E.; Ainette, M.G.; Morehouse, E.; Fenster, B. A dual-process model of early substance use: Tests in two diverse populations of adolescents. Health Psychol. 2013, 32, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wills, T.A.; Yaeger, A.M. Family Factors and Adolescent Substance Use: Models and Mechanisms. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shaikh, M.A. Tobacco use in school students in Afghanistan, Oman and Kuwait and association with parental monitoring: Analysis of data from Global School-based Student Health surveys. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2020, 26, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wills, T.A.; Dishion, T.J. Temperament and adolescent substance use: A transactional analysis of emerging self-control. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2004, 33, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wills, T.A.; Sandy, J.M.; Yaeger, A. Temperament and adolescent substance use: An epigenetic approach to risk and protection. J. Pers. 2000, 68, 1127–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tornay, L.; Michaud, P.A.; Gmel, G.; Wilson, M.L.; Berchtold, A.; Surís, J.C. Parental monitoring: A way to decrease substance use among Swiss adolescents? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2013, 172, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yabiku, S.T.; Marsiglia, F.F.; Kulis, S.; Parsai, M.B.; Becerra, D.; Del-Colle, M. Parental monitoring and changes in substance use among Latino/a and non-Latino/a preadolescents in the Southwest. Subst. Use Misuse 2010, 45, 2524–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clark, H.K.; Shamblen, S.R.; Ringwalt, C.L.; Hanley, S. Predicting high risk adolescents’ substance use over time: The role of parental monitoring. J. Prim. Prev. 2012, 33, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barnes, G.M.; Hoffman, J.H.; Welte, J.W.; Farrell, M.P.; Dintcheff, B.A. Effects of Parental Monitoring and Peer Deviance on Substance Use and Delinquency. J. Marriage Fam. 2006, 68, 1084–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Warren, J.R.; Wagstaff, D.A.; Hecht, M.L.; Elek, E. The Effects of Mexican origin family structure on parental monitoring and pre-adolescent substance use expectancies and substance use. J. Subst. Use 2008, 13, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gerrard, M.; Gibbons, F.X.; Stock, M.L.; Lune, L.S.V.; Cleveland, M.J. Images of smokers and willingness to smoke among African American pre-adolescents: An application of the prototype/willingness model of adolescent health risk behavior to smoking initiation. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2005, 30, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Epperson, A.E.; Wallander, J.L.; Song, A.V.; Depaoli, S.; Peskin, M.F.; Elliott, M.N.; Schuster, M.A. Gender and racial/ethnic differences in adolescent intentions and willingness to smoke cigarettes: Evaluation of a structural equation model. J. Health Psychol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Lam, C.B.; McHale, S.M.; Crouter, A.C. Time with peers from middle childhood to late adolescence: Developmental course and adjustment correlates. Child Dev. 2014, 85, 1677–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mair, C.; Lipperman-Kreda, S.; Gruenewald, P.J.; Bersamin, M.; Grube, J.W. Adolescent Drinking Risks Associated with Specific Drinking Contexts. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2015, 39, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Westling, E.; Andrews, J.A.; Hampson, S.E.; Peterson, M. Pubertal timing and substance use: The effects of gender, parental monitoring and deviant peers. J. Adolesc. Health 2008, 42, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Schofield, T.J.; Conger, R.D.; Robins, R.W. Early adolescent substance use in Mexican origin families: Peer selection, peer influence, and parental monitoring. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015, 157, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hirschi, T. Causes of Delinquency; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  41. Calafat, A.; García, F.; Juan, M.; Becoña, E.; Fernández-Hermida, J.R. Which parenting style is more protective against adolescent substance use? Evidence within the European context. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014, 138, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sarmento, D.R.; Yehadji, D. An analysis of global youth tobacco survey for developing a comprehensive national smoking policy in Timor-Leste. BMC Public Health 2015, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Anda, R.F.; Brown, D.W. Smoking among youth in East Timor-Leste: What are the dynamics? Indian Pediatr. 2008, 45, 961–962. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cook Islands Global School-based Health Survey 2010 Report. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/Cook-Islands-GSHS-Report-2010.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  45. Curaçao Global School-Based Student Health Survey 2015 | GHDx. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/Final_report_2015_GSHS_Curacao.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  46. Arrazola, R.A.; Ahluwalia, I.B.; Pun, E.; Garcia de Quevedo, I.; Babb, S.; Armour, B.S. Current Tobacco Smoking and Desire to Quit Smoking Among Students Aged 13–15 Years-Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 61 Countries, 2012–2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. D’Angelo, D. Current Cigarette Smoking, Access, and Purchases from Retail Outlets Among Students Aged 13–15 Years — Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 45 Countries, 2013 and 2014. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Swan, A.; Melia, R.; Fitzsimons, B.; Breeze, E.; Murray, M. Why do more girls than boys smoke cigarettes? Health Educ. J. 1988, 48, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jaakkola, J.J.; Gissler, M. Are girls more susceptible to the effects of prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke on asthma? Epidemiology 2007, 18, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Richardson, C.G.; Struik, L.L.; Johnson, K.C.; Ratner, P.A.; Gotay, C.; Memetovic, J.; Okoli, C.T.; Bottorff, J.L. Initial impact of tailored web-based messages about cigarette smoke and breast cancer risk on boys’ and girls’ risk perceptions and information seeking: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2013, 2, e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kessaram, T. Tobacco Smoking in Islands of the Pacific Region, 2001–2013. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2015, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hukkelberg, S.S.; Dykstra, J.L. Using the Prototype/Willingness model to predict smoking behaviour among Norwegian adolescents. Addict. Behav. 2009, 34, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mahabee-Gittens, E.M.; Xiao, Y.; Gordon, J.S.; Khoury, J.C. The Role of Family Influences on Adolescent Smoking in Different Racial/Ethnic Groups. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2012, 14, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Light, J.M.; Greenan, C.C.; Rusby, J.C.; Nies, K.M.; Snijders, T.A.B. Onset to First Alcohol Use in Early Adolescence: A Network Diffusion Model. J. Res. Adolesc. 2013, 23, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Page, R. Using the global-school-based student health survey to identify correlates of smoking in Chilean youth. Int. Electron. J. Health Educ. 2009, 12, 528. [Google Scholar]
  56. Clark, D.A.; Donnellan, M.B.; Robins, R.W.; Conger, R.D. Early adolescent temperament, parental monitoring, and substance use in Mexican-origin adolescents. J. Adolesc. 2015, 41, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of tobacco use and cigarette smoking in school attending adolescents.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of tobacco use and cigarette smoking in school attending adolescents.
Cook Islands (n = 701)Curaçao (n = 2765)Timor-Leste (n = 3704)
Current cigarette smoker
Yes144 (20.0%)229 (9.0%)739 (22.8%)
No546 (80.0%)2500 (91.0%)2805 (77.2%)
Missing1136160
Age first tried a cigarette (years)
Never smoked cigarette349 (52.2%)1848 (67.5%)1897 (66.7%)
7 or younger66 (9.2%)85 (3.4%)120 (4.1%)
8 or 964 (9.7%)81 (2.9%)67 (2.3%)
10 or 1150 (7.2%)134 (5.4%)93 (3.5%)
12 or 1361 (8.9%)208 (8.0%)99 (3.6%)
14 or 1550 (7.3%)182 (7.3%)194 (7.3%)
16 or 1731 (4.2%)108 (4.5%)205 (8.5%)
18 or older9 (1.3%)28 (1.0%)90 (4.0%)
Missing2191939
Tried to quit cigarette smoking
Never smoked423 (62.9%)2068 (76.3%)2213 (72.5%)
Didn’t smoke in past 12 months119 (17.4%)359 (14.2%)164 (5.6%)
Yes108 (15.1%)149 (6.1%)434 (16.5%)
No31 (4.6%)84 (3.4%)160 (5.4%)
Missing20105733
Others smoked cigarette in my presence
0 days220 (32.0%)1160 (41.7%)798 (20.3%)
1 or 2 days157 (23.1%)839 (31.0%)1269 (34.3%)
3 or 4 days71 (10.1%)272 (10.2%)326 (8.9%)
5 or 6 days42 (5.7%)86 (3.3%)202 (5.4%)
All 7 days206 (29.1%)372 (13.8%)1061 (31.1%)
Missing53648
Current tobacco user in other forms
Yes112 (15.3%)203 (7.7%)690 (18.7%)
No586 (84.7%)2525 (92.3%)2963 (81.3%)
Missing33751
All frequencies are unweighted, while percentages are weighted.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations by current tobacco use (cigarette and/or other forms) status in school attending adolescents.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations by current tobacco use (cigarette and/or other forms) status in school attending adolescents.
Cook IslandsCuraçaoEast Timor
(n = 701 *)(n = 2765 *)(n = 3704 *)
Current Tobacco User
YesNoYesNoYesNo
n%n%n%n%n%n%
Age (years)
11 years or less 461.2791.9
12 years or less 130.42456.7 290.71212.4
13 years or less81.1558.3260.72978.7691.52504.9
14264.112818.9632.240114.11232.84409.8
15375.111015.9652.440015.61363.545011.9
16394.712717.8512.330012.31855.546413.5
17344.88612.6492.130612.62297.449216.2
18 years or more121.7345.0773.044216.91996.92959.9
Missing1–2–1–8–30–44–
Mean15.615.315.815.416.015.6
SD1.41.41.71.91.81.8
p value0.0800.0010.002
Sex
Male8554.425546.918557.7103147.466573.095141.5
Female7145.628353.115442.3134752.631027.0155858.5
Missing1–4–6–21–71–126–
p value0.10120.0024<0.0001
Parents/guardians use tobacco
Neither5233.626749.621062.3186178.338439.7117145.7
Father/Male guardian3421.98315.15417.628611.820818.838514.8
Mother/Female guardian2013.16011.8328.51124.8706.2572.1
Both2718.17613.4226.3642.815715.430111.9
I do not know2313.35510.1185.3562.319319.968225.5
Missing1–1–9–20–34–39–
Parental monitoring (understanding)
Yes4127.215629.012840.7125154.913012.927411.4
No11672.838671.018459.3101845.187187.1233588.6
Missing value0–0–33–130–45–26
p Value0.70640.00030.4064
Parental monitoring (free time activities)
Yes4730.822942.114846.2152567.225525.354622.7
No10869.231357.916453.873332.873674.7202577.3
Missing value2–0–33–141–55–64
p Value0.0225<0.00010.3222
Parental monitoring (went over things without permission)
Yes2415.57614.84614.82189.8969.91556.6
No13384.546685.226685.2204690.290990.1242893.4
Missing value0–0–33–135–41–52–
p Value0.81770.03770.0127
Parental monitoring (checking homework)
Yes4025.617432.97924.181334.925125.776629.7
No11674.436867.122975.9146765.175174.3184170.3
Missing value1–0–37–119–44–28–
p Value0.08680.00210.0221
* For 2 records in Cook Islands, 21 records in Curaçao, and 23 records in East Timor, information on current tobacco use (defined as current cigarette smoker and/or current tobacco user) was missing. All frequencies are unweighted, while percentages are weighted.
Table
Table 3. Multivariate analysis of current tobacco use and parental monitoring activities among school attending adolescents.
Table 3. Multivariate analysis of current tobacco use and parental monitoring activities among school attending adolescents.
Cook IslandsCuraçaoTimor-Leste
OROROR
OR (95%CI)OR (95%CI)OR (95%CI)
p valuep valuep value
aORaORaOR
aOR (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)
p valuep valuep value
Parental understanding
Yes0.920.561.15
0.58–1.450.41–0.770.81–1.64
0.706<0.00010.407
No1.140.811.05
0.55–2.370.58–1.130.73–1.53
0.6300.2100.769
111
Parental monitoring (free time activities)
Yes0.610.421.15
0.40–0.930.31–0.560.86–1.54
0.23<0.00010.322
No0.630.481.17
0.34–1.160.35–0.650.87–1.56
0.046<0.00010.277
111
Parental monitoring (went over things without permission)
Yes1.051.601.56
0.67–1.661.02–2.491.11–2.19
0.8180.0390.013
No1.111.691.54
0.63–1.981.04–2.741.19–2.00
0.6170.0350.002
111
Parental monitoring (checking homework)
Yes0.700.590.82
0.47–1.060.42–0.820.69–0.97
0.0880.0020.022
No0.760.710.76
0.43–1.360.47–1.060.62–0.91
0.2130.0970.006
111
OR = Odds Ratio; aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaikh, M.A.; Zare, Z.; Ng, K.W.; Celedonia, K.L.; Lowery Wilson, M. Tobacco Use and Parental Monitoring—Observations from Three Diverse Island Nations—Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207360

AMA Style

Shaikh MA, Zare Z, Ng KW, Celedonia KL, Lowery Wilson M. Tobacco Use and Parental Monitoring—Observations from Three Diverse Island Nations—Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(20):7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaikh, Masood Ali, Zahra Zare, Kwok W. Ng, Karen L. Celedonia, and Michael Lowery Wilson. 2020. "Tobacco Use and Parental Monitoring—Observations from Three Diverse Island Nations—Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 20: 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207360

APA Style

Shaikh, M. A., Zare, Z., Ng, K. W., Celedonia, K. L., & Lowery Wilson, M. (2020). Tobacco Use and Parental Monitoring—Observations from Three Diverse Island Nations—Cook Islands, Curaçao, and East Timor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop