Next Article in Journal
Using Rutilus rutilus (L.) and Perca fluviatilis (L.) as Bioindicators of the Environmental Condition and Human Health: Lake Łańskie, Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
The Crossover Effects of Supervisors’ Workaholism on Subordinates’ Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Two Types of Job Demands and Emotional Exhaustion
Previous Article in Journal
A Model Depicting the Retail Food Environment and Customer Interactions: Components, Outcomes, and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Maladaptive Rumination Mediates the Relationship between Self-Esteem, Perfectionism, and Work Addiction: A Largescale Survey Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7594; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207594
by Frédéric Dutheil 1,*, Morteza Charkhabi 2, Hortense Ravoux 1, Georges Brousse 3, Samuel Dewavrin 4, Thomas Cornet 4, Laurie Mondillon 5, Sihui Han 6, Daniela Pfabigan 6, Julien S Baker 7, Martial Mermillod 8, Jeannot Schmidt 9, Fares Moustafa 9 and Bruno Pereira 10
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7594; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207594
Submission received: 22 August 2020 / Revised: 7 October 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 / Published: 19 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Workaholism Research)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I am happy with the revised version of the paper. 

Author Response

See attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript "Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-related outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model".

Authors have significantly improved the quality of the manuscript. 

The study is based on the JDCS theory. The literature review reads more like a list of previous research on a variety of topics rather than a theory section that explains how your different concepts are related. Try to integrate this section better and build a stronger case of the need for your study.

Authors have mainly focused on study Measures. There is less information on study methodology and participants. There is no theoretical and practical contribution to the study.

Authors have mentioned Fig 1 and Fig 2 but I can not find these two figures in the revised manuscript. 

Authors should add some recent studies and cite them in the manuscript. 

Please check the manuscript reference style. All the references should be according to the journal format. 

The manuscript conclusion is too simple and it does not contribute to exiting studies.  

Author Response

See attachment.

Back to TopTop