Next Article in Journal
Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Application of Italian National Guidelines for Prevention and Management of Dental Injuries in Developmental Age
Previous Article in Journal
Using Mobile Health and the Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life: Perceptions of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph17082651
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Histological Effects of an Innovative 445 Nm Blue Laser During Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy

by
Gaspare Palaia
1,
Daniele Pergolini
1,
Leonardo D’Alessandro
1,
Raffaella Carletti
2,
Alessandro Del Vecchio
1,
Gianluca Tenore
1,*,
Cira Rosaria Tiziana Di Gioia
2 and
Umberto Romeo
1
1
Department of Oral Sciences and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(8), 2651; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082651
Submission received: 24 March 2020 / Revised: 8 April 2020 / Accepted: 9 April 2020 / Published: 13 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Prevention and Management of Oral Healthcare)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Continuously evolving laser devices can be used in various fields; they are an alternative to the traditional cold blade surgery to perform biopsies of oral soft tissues. The aspect focused on in this paper is the possibility to use the 445 nm diode laser (Eltech K-Laser srl, Treviso, Italy) in complete safety, by evaluating its thermal effects during microscopy. A histological evaluation of the alteration of the peri-incisional edges on 10 samples was realized. All excisional biopsies were related to clinically unsuspected lesions and performed by the same expert operator. The surgical procedure was performed with the same laser parameters and the same pathologist evaluated the thermal effect on the samples. An average value of the detected tissue alteration was calculated; the average damage of the epithelium was 650.93 μm, while in the connective tissue it was 468.07 μm. In all the cases a clear diagnosis was possible, and no clinical complications were observed; so, the 445 nm diode laser proved to be a device that can be safely used for biopsies of clinically unsuspicious lesions. Due to the small number of cases, this in vivo preliminary experience needs to be extended.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the world trend in medicine is to follow scientific evolution, sustained by experimental research, in order to achieve and to prove the effectiveness of new devices that can simplify and make clinical activity more practical. In dentistry, laser is an innovative device, which has been used for several years but it is a current object of research and it is constantly evolving.
The first laser device dates back to 1960; it was invented by Theodore Maiman, and it was used in the dental field just four years later by R. Stern and R. Sognnaes. Lasers emit a typically monochromatic light with a specific wavelength that is highly focused, has a directional collimated beam, is evenly organized and efficient, and emitted like a coherent energy at high intensity [1,2].
Laser devices are used in all dental fields, from oral surgery to restorative dentistry, according to the features and type of wavelength. Recently, it has also found use in perioral aesthetics, such as in wrinkles or vascular lesions. Regarding oral soft tissue pathologies, the laser has found various uses over the years, as a device to make biopsy samples, or it can be used for the ablation of keratotic lesions or to photocoagulate vascular lesions or in photobiomodulation [1,2,3,4].
Regarding laser biopsies, a goal of this research is to analyze the thermal effects that occur at the peri-incisional tissues, following the surgical act of laser incision. In the surgical act, some lasers offer several advantages compared to the use of the scalpel [5]. On the oral soft tissues, based on the nature of the pathological tissue and the anatomical district, better results can be obtained by selecting the most suitable laser device. For example, a CO2 laser is optimal in the excision of very hydrated lesions, such as fibrous lesions, while diode lasers, which have a better coagulating action, can be exploited especially for very vascularized lesions or tissues, rich in vessels with a high amount of hemoglobin [6,7].
When a laser device is used in oral soft tissues surgery, many advantages could be described, such as easier surgical access, mostly in sites that are difficult to approach and do not offer a cleavage plan; better ergonomics [8]; accurate cut [9]; antimicrobial action of the surgical site [10]; more effective hemostasis, with intraoperative bleeding control and better visibility [5]; no sutures for intraoperative coagulation, with a second intention healing [6]; reduction of post-operative pain and edema [11]; reduction in the use of a local anesthetic [12]; reduced postoperative complications, such as dehiscence, and faster healing [7]; and faster and easier use [6]. By contrast, it requires a learning curve [13].
Among the possible disadvantages, in addition to the device’s cost, is the thermal effect of soft tissues being incised; this effect does not prevent having a histological diagnosis, but it can make reading of marginal tissues not optimal, in relation to the heat distributed to the cells impacted by the laser beam; so, alterations in the cell’s structure can be caused by the carbonization or denaturation of the proteins. Moreover, the evaluation about a complete excision of a pathological tissue at the level of the peri-incisional margins could be made hard, especially if the operator is not skilled [14,15].
Several studies have been made about the thermal effect on soft tissues of the oral cavity, both “ex vivo” and “in vivo”, with CO2 [6,16], diode [17], KTP [18], Nd:YAG [19] and Er:YAG [20] laser devices.
The blue diode laser is a novel device in the dental field; it is a semiconductor laser, with a GaN or InGaN active medium, emitting electromagnetic radiations in a range of 458–488 nm, perceived as blue by the human eye [21].
The aim of this study is to analyze the thermal effect determined by a blue light diode laser device (445 nm) of the last generation on oral soft tissues during a biopsy of unsuspected lesions, in order to define its use in excisional biopsies, as an alternative to the conventional scalpel method.

2. Materials and Methods

In this “case series”, patients were recruited in the Odontostomatologic Unit of Policlinic Umberto I of Sapienza University of Rome.
Selection criteria were as follows: patients over 12 years of age; patients with systemic disease; patients with smoke addiction; unsuspicious oral soft tissue lesions; lesions not involving bone tissue; and clinically benign oral lesions within 2 cm in diameter. All patients with white and/or red patches or any ulcerated or erosive areas were excluded by the study.
Patients affected by oral vesiculobullous diseases, with a necrotic, exposed jaw bone or a history of local irradiation therapy, with oncological disease or with a severe state of immunosuppression were excluded in this study.
This study was realized with a blue light diode laser (Eltech K-Laser srl, Treviso, Italy), with a wavelength of 445 nm ± 5 nm, at 2.5 Watt in Continuous Wave (CW), to make the surgical procedure faster, with a 320 μm surgical optical fiber and a fluence of 3100 J/cm2, according to the device settings.
Local anesthesia, with 1.8 mL of mepivacaine solution (MEPIVACAINA PIERREL®, 30 mg/mL, injection solution 1.8 mL, Pierrel Spa, Milan, Italy) was administered before the beginning of each surgical intervention and after surgery all samples were sent to the pathologist for histological evaluation and diagnosis. Ten excisional biopsies of clinically benign oral lesions, of nine patients, as reported in Table 1, six women and three men, were performed in our Department, between November 2018 and January 2019. Two separate lesions were taken, during the same surgery, on the same woman patient. No sutures were applied to obtain wound healing by secondary intention.
All excised specimens were instantly fixed in a 10% neutral buffered formalin solution, then included in paraffin and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) for histological examination.
All patients were subsequently examined with 7 days and 1 month follow-ups. The prescribed medication for the patients was 0.2% chlorhexidine spray (Corsodyl®, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare S.p.A, Baranzate, Milan, Italy) prescribed for three times a day for one week. No other medications (such as antibiotics or FANS) have been prescribed [22].
The histological analysis was performed with an optical microscope (Leica Leitz Camera; Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany). A computerized digital camera (Olympus Camedia 5050; Olympus Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture 5 Mp (24-bit color depth) images (×100 magnification) of the surgical resection margins (stored as JPG files). Computerized imaging software (ImageScope, Leica Biosystem, Milan, Italy) was utilized by a blinded pathologist to quantitatively evaluate the thermal effect in both the epithelium and connective tissue, expressed in microns.
The quantitative evaluation of the thermal effect at the peri-incisional margins on the histological section, stained with H&E, was measured with ImageScope software (ImageScope, Leica Biosystem, Milan, Italy). The depth of the tissue structural alterations, such as the coarctation and vacuolation of the squamous epithelium and the basophilic amorphous appearance of the connective tissue due to protein coagulation, were considered for the evaluation; the average thermal effects were calculated in epithelial and connective tissues, separately (Figure 1).
The statistical analysis, both for the mean and standard deviation, was done through the software Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), with several checks to identify any errors. In the Sample Standard Deviation formula, the numerator is the sum of the squared deviation of each specimen’s thermal effect, from the mean thermal effect, and the denominator is N − 1, where N is the number of specimens.
All the interventions were performed by the same oral surgeon and conducted according to and passing the online examination for the Certificate in Essential Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (Certificate number: EGCP19/3015) and following the guidelines of the World Medical Association, as well as adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki according to the local Ethical Committee guidelines (No. 4011). All participants underwent the same procedures without any deviation from the protocol during the entire trial and were informed about the methods of treatment and gave written informed consent.

3. Results

In all the cases, epithelial and connective thermal effects did not prevent specimen reading and the formulation of a histological diagnosis (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4); this according to the altered morphology and architecture of the tissue, due to the thermal effect, and which was evaluated by the pathologist.
The average thermal effect was 650.93 μm on epithelium, with a standard deviation of ±311.96, and 468.07 μm on connective tissue, with a standard deviation of ±264.23 (Figure 5). Only in one case there was an artifact of the epithelium, just over 1 mm, as reported in Table 2; the highest epithelial thermal effect was in Sample 5 while on the connective tissue it was in Sample 3. In all other cases, the thermal effect of both the epithelium and the connective tissue was lower than 1 mm, as reported in Table 2. The lesions that were identified as Pyogenic Granuloma during the histological examination, Samples 3 and 6.1 (Figure 2), showed the greatest thermal effect at the connective level compared to the other samples, due to the high vascular content of these lesions; this is because hemoglobin is the target chromophore for the 445 nm wavelength. The lesions that were identified, upon histological examination, as Squamous Papilloma, Samples 2 (Figure 3), 7 and 8 (Figure 4), showed a very low histological alteration relating to the heat, both at the level of the epithelium and of the connective tissue, due to a reduced vascular component of these HPV-related lesions.
Diode blue laser, in addition to guaranteeing an optimal intraoperative hemostatic effect, which allows the clinician to perform biopsies even in the most vascularized sites as soft palate, permitted an optimal reading of the specimen, as shown in these 10 biopsies.

4. Discussion

The importance of a biopsy is now proved; it is a surgical procedure that allows to have a diagnosis of certainty, which may or not confirm a clinical diagnostic suspicion [23]. Due to the important role of the biopsy, as the specimen taken is uniquely and thus not repeatable, even from a medical-legal point of view, this procedure needs to be performed within the full safety margins [14,15]. Since laser has been used in a versatile way as a useful device in the surgical field, even for biopsies, there have been several studies aimed to test its safety [10,18,20]; but there are several authors who, especially in the past, valued controversies in the use of these devices in the field of biopsy surgery [14,15,24]. The critical aspect is not the difficult diagnosis of the specimen, since the various laser devices are now able to guarantee a histological diagnosis, if used with the right parameters and by a skilled operator, but the legibility of the peri-incisional margins of the specimen. This is significant because the reading of the margins must be guaranteed in case of potentially malignant epithelial lesions, which can infiltrate tissues in depth and for which it is essential to understand if the pathological tissue has been completely excised [25,26]. In order not to run into this problem, the gold standard for suspicious lesions remains the cold blade, but alternatively the incision can be spaced, depending on the wavelengths used, at least 0.5 mm away from clinically visible pathological tissue [27,28]. Therefore, it is essential to correctly identify unsuspicious lesions by differentiating them from potentially malignant lesions, based on semiological criteria, identifying clinical diagnostic suspects that will be confirmed, or not, by histological examination; for this reason, clinicians should be qualified in oral pathology [29].
The possibility of having a diagnosis, with laser devices, is maintained, despite the thermal effect in the peri-incisional area due to the heat released by the photothermal effect, which increases the temperature of the tissue, at the incision point; so, it is clear that the laser can be used for biopsies of clinically benign lesions [30,31]. Compared to the traditional cold blade approach, however, the laser offers numerous advantages, including a hemostatic effect that defines intraoperative hemostasis, antibacterial effect on the incision path, better patient comfort, second intention healing without sutures and reduced postoperative edema [11]; for this reason, it is considered the gold standard in the approach to clinically benign lesions of oral soft tissues [32,33].
The histological study of the thermal effect is necessary to define the healthy tissue surrounding the lesion, which must be taken in order not to alter [6] the reading of the specimen, and be related to the specific laser device used, for its thermal effect, if it is used for biopsies of potentially malignant epithelial lesions [18,34].
Our results with a 445 nm blue laser, in addition to the intraoperative and postoperative advantages, agree with Reichelt et al. [35], who found no significant alterations at the level of the excised tissues, and all samples had a histological diagnosis; moreover, all the pieces showed the heat-related alterations were contained.
Comparing the results with a study with a blue laser of 445 nm “ex vivo”, on pig tongues, referring to the group of specimens excised with a power of 2 Watt in a continuous way (CW), the “in vivo” thermal effect was higher, both on the epithelium and connective tissue, but the epithelial thermal effect was mostly greater; furthermore, at various power and emission ways, the “ex vivo” thermal effect on the epithelium was greater than on the connective tissue, in all specimens [36].
The different results obtained “in vivo” are probably due to the vascular component, because the vascularization is reduced on a cadaver. Moreover more vascularized lesions, such as Pyogenic Granuloma, showed a greater thermal effect due to an increase in the laser parameters for intraoperative coagulation [37].
In fact, the lesions identified as Pyogenic Granuloma after histological examination, Samples 3 and 6.1 (Figure 2), showed the greatest thermal effect at the connective level compared to the other samples, due to the high vascular content of these lesions, because hemoglobin is the target chromophore for the 445 nm wavelength and because irradiation was repeated more frequently to obtain coagulation.
By contrast, the lesions that were identified, upon histological examination, as Squamous Papilloma, Sample 2 (Figure 3), 7 and 8 (Figure 4), showed very low histological alteration, relating to the heat, both at the level of the epithelium and of the connective tissue, due to a reduced vascular component of these HPV-related lesions and the poor intraoperative bleeding.
A limitation of the study was the reduced sample size, as such it is preliminary evidence; the objective is to increase the number of cases evaluated to have more indicative values related to oral soft tissue thermal effects.
Compared to the CO2 laser, the blue diode laser showed both lower epithelial and connective tissue average thermal effects [38].
The diode laser, compared to the cold blade or the Er: YAG laser [6,10,39], causes greater tissue thermal damage, but it still allows a good reading of the specimens. The ex vivo effect of the Er: YAG laser on soft tissues showed peripheral thermal damage using a power of 3.9 W, and remained within 1 mm, while with intermediate parameters the thermal effect was lower [20]; but the lack of tissues with blood flow in vivo, presented in our study, should be considered.
At present, few in vivo studies have been conducted with this wavelength, therefore it was not possible to compare the data obtained with similar devices [40,41,42].

5. Conclusions

As emerged from this preliminary study, in addition to the clinical advantages of laser devices, with a blue diode laser of 445 nm, an optimal evaluation of specimens and a histological diagnosis were allowed in all the cases.
Therefore, the laser confirms its use in the surgical field, as a tool for biopsies, if it is used for clinically benign lesions, for its contained thermal effect; however, a clinical evaluation of the lesions is required before the procedure.
For suspected lesions, the margins of tissue taken should be enlarged to healthy tissue, and in CW with this device may be taken with a safety margin of 1 mm, but other studies are needed to confirm that; in these cases, cold blade could be still considered the gold standard.

Author Contributions

G.P., D.P., R.C. and G.T. contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; L.D. contributed to data acquisition; A.D.V., C.R.T.D.G. and U.R. contributed to data analysis and interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deppe, H.; Horch, H.H. Current status of laser applications in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Med. Laser Appl. 2007, 22, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wigdor, H.A.; Walsh, J.T.; Featherstone, J.D.B.; Visuri, S.R.; Fried, D.; Waldvogel, J.L. Lasers in dentistry. Lasers Surg. Med. 1995, 16, 103–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cadavid, A.M.H.; de Campos, W.G.; Aranha, A.C.C.; Lemos-Junior, C.A. Efficacy of photocoagulation of vascular malformations in the oral mucosa using Nd: YAG laser. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2018, 29, e614–e617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Impellizzeri, A.; Palaia, G.; Horodynski, M.; Pergolini, D.; Vernucci, R.A.; Romeo, U.; Galluccio, G. CO2 laser for surgical exposure of impacted palatally canines. Dental Cadmos 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rizoiu, I.M.; Eversole, L.R.; Kimmel, A.I. Effects of an erbium, chromium: Yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet laser on mucocutanous soft tissues. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1996, 82, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suter, V.G.A.; Altermatt, H.J.; Bornstein, M.M. A randomized controlled clinical and histopathological trial comparing excisional biopsies of oral fibrous hyperplasias using CO2 and Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palaia, G.; Del Vecchio, A.; Impellizzeri, A.; Tenore, G.; Visca, P.; Libotte, F.; Russo, C.; Romeo, U. Histological ex vivo evaluation of peri-incisional thermal effect created by a new-generation CO2 superpulsed laser. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 345685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Azma, E.; Safavi, N. Diode laser application in soft tissue oral surgery. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 4, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tirelli, G.; Boscolo Nata, F.; Bussani, R.; Gatto, A.; Quatela, E.; Rigo, S.; Piovesana, M. How we improve the transoral resection for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: The CO2 waveguide laser. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2019, 276, 2301–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monteiro, L.; Delgado, M.L.; Garcês, F.; Machado, M.; Ferreira, F.; Martins, M.; Salazar, F.; Pacheco, J.J. A histological evaluation of the surgical margins from human oral fibrous-epithelial lesions excised with CO2 laser, diode laser, er:Yag laser, nd:Yag laser, electrosurgical scalpel and cold scalpel. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2019, 24, e271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Myers, M.L. The effect of laser irradiation on oral tissues. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1991, 66, 395–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Genovese, M.D.; Olivi, G. Laser in paediatric dentistry: Patient acceptance of hard and soft tissue therapy. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2008, 9, 13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Myers, T.D.; Sulewski, J.G. Evaluating dental lasers: What the clinician should know. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2004, 48, 1127–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Eversole, L.R. Laser artifacts and diagnostic biopsy. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1997, 83, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Convissar, R.A. Laser biopsy artifact. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1997, 84, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tuncer, I.; Ozçakir-Tomruk, C.; Sencift, K.; Cöloǧlu, S. Comparison of conventional surgery and CO2 laser on intraoral soft tissue pathologies and evaluation of the collateral thermal damage. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2010, 28, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Angiero, F.; Parma, L.; Crippa, R.; Benedicenti, S. Diode laser (808 nm) applied to oral soft tissue lesions: A retrospective study to assess histopathological diagnosis and evaluate physical damage. Lasers Med. Sci. 2012, 28, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Romeo, U.; Russo, C.; Palaia, G.; Lo Giudice, R.; Del Vecchio, A.; Visca, P.; Migliau, G.; De Biase, A. Biopsy of different oral soft tissues lesions by KTP and diode laser: Histological evaluation. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 761704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vescovi, P.; Corcione, L.; Meleti, M.; Merigo, E.; Fornaini, C.; Manfredi, M.; Bonanini, M.; Govoni, P.; Rocca, J.P.; Nammour, S. Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa. Lasers Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Romeo, U.; Libotte, F.; Palaia, G.; Del Vecchio, A.; Tenore, G.; Visca, P.; Nammour, S.; Polimeni, A. Histological in vitro evaluation of the effects of Er:YAG laser on oral soft tissues. Lasers Med. Sci. 2012, 27, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nakamura, S.; Senoh, M.; Nagahama, S.I.; Iwasa, N.; Matsushita, T.; Mukai, T. Blue InGaN-based laser diodes with an emission wavelength of 450 nm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palaia, G.; Tenore, G.; Tribolati, L.; Russo, C.; Gaimari, G.; Del Vecchio, A.; Romeo, U. Evaluation of wound healing and postoperative pain after oral mucosa laser biopsy with the aid of compound with chlorhexidine and sodium hyaluronate: A randomized double blind clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 3141–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mota-Ramírez, A.; Silvestre, F.J.; Simó, J.M. Oral biopsy in dental practice. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cirugía Bucal 2007, 12, 504–510. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, G.; Sano, K.; Ikeda, H.; Inokuchi, T. Promotional effects of CO2 laser and scalpel incision on 4-NQO-induced premalignant lesions of mouse tongue. Lasers Surg. Med. 1999, 25, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Awadallah, M.; Idle, M.; Patel, K.; Kademani, D. Management update of potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2018, 125, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Issa, B.; Padilla, R.; Brennan, M.T. Diagnosis and management of mucosal lesions with the potential for malignant transformation. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2013, 41, 343–348. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dong, Y.; Chen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, Y. Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia treated with carbon dioxide laser: A meta-analysis. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Romeo, U.; Palaia, G.; Del Vecchio, A.; Tenore, G.; Gambarini, G.; Gutknecht, N.; De Luca, M. Effects of KTP laser on oral soft tissues. An in vitro study. Lasers Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Maia, H.C.M.; Pinto, N.A.S.; Pereira, J.D.S.; de Medeiros, A.M.C.; da Silveira, É.J.D.; da Miguel, M.C.C. Potentially malignant oral lesions: Clinicopathological correlations. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016, 14, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Vescovi, P.; Merigo, E.; Fornaini, C.; Rocca, J.P.; Nammour, S. Thermal increase in the oral mucosa and in the jawbone during Nd: YAG laser applications. Ex vivo study. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2012, 17, e679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Romanos, G.E.; Sacks, D.; Montanaro, N.; Delgado-Ruiz, R.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; Javed, F. Effect of Initiators on Thermal Changes in Soft Tissues Using a Diode Laser. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2018, 36, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jin, J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Yoon, H.J. A comparative study of wound healing following incision with a scalpel, diode laser or Er, Cr:YSGG laser in guinea pig oral mucosa: A histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2010, 68, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frigerio, A.; Tan, O.T. Laser applications for benign oral lesions. Lasers Surg. Med. 2015, 47, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vu, J.; Coleman, H.G.; Palme, C.E.; Riffat, F.; Schifter, M.; Zoellner, H. Diagnostic utility of microsurgical carbon dioxide laser excision of oral potentially malignant lesions vs incisional biopsy: A retrospective histopathological review. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2019, 127, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reichelt, J.; Winter, J.; Meister, J.; Frentzen, M.; Kraus, D. A novel blue light laser system for surgical applications in dentistry: Evaluation of specific laser-tissue interactions in monolayer cultures. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 21, 985–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Palaia, G.; Impellizzeri, A.; Tenore, G.; Caporali, F.; Visca, P.; Del Vecchio, A.; Galluccio, G.; Polimeni, A.; Romeo, U. Ex vivo histological analysis of the thermal effects created by a 445-nm diode laser in oral soft tissue biopsy. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Isola, G.; Matarese, G.; Cervino, G.; Matarese, M.; Ramaglia, L.; Cicciù, M. Clinical efficacy and patient perceptions of pyogenic granuloma excision using diode laser versus conventional surgical techniques. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2018, 29, 2160–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tenore, G.; Palaia, G.; Mohsen, A.; Ambrogiano, S.; Di Gioia, C.R.T.; Dominiak, M.; Romeo, U. Could the super-pulsed CO2 laser be used for oral excisional biopsies? Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 28, 1513–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Suter, V.G.A.; Altermatt, H.J.; Bornstein, M.M. A randomized controlled trial comparing surgical excisional biopsies using CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser and scalpel. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 49, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Braun, A.; Kettner, M.; Berthold, M.; Wenzler, J.S.; Heymann, P.G.B.; Frankenberger, R. Efficiency of soft tissue incision with a novel 445-nm semiconductor laser. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, D.L.; Yang, Z.; Liu, G.X.; Wu, K.; Fan, J.; Wu, D.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Guo, P.; Mu, L.; et al. A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: Efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fornaini, C.; Merigo, E.; Rocca, J.P.; Lagori, G.; Raybaud, H.; Selleri, S.; Cucinotta, A. 450 nm blue laser and oral surgery: Preliminary ex vivo study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2016, 17, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 17 02651 g001 550
Figure 1. Values of thermal effects, expressed in μm, obtained on epithelium, connective tissues and in total for each specimen.
Figure 1. Values of thermal effects, expressed in μm, obtained on epithelium, connective tissues and in total for each specimen.
Ijerph 17 02651 g001
Ijerph 17 02651 g002 550
Figure 2. Specimen 1 of Case 6—Pyogenic Granuloma; stain H&E, magnification 10X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Figure 2. Specimen 1 of Case 6—Pyogenic Granuloma; stain H&E, magnification 10X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Ijerph 17 02651 g002
Ijerph 17 02651 g003 550
Figure 3. Case 2—Squamous Papilloma; stain H&E, magnification 5X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Figure 3. Case 2—Squamous Papilloma; stain H&E, magnification 5X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Ijerph 17 02651 g003
Ijerph 17 02651 g004 550
Figure 4. Case 8—Squamous Papilloma; stain H&E, magnification 5X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Figure 4. Case 8—Squamous Papilloma; stain H&E, magnification 5X. The pink line for epithelium and purple line for connective tissue point out the thermal effect.
Ijerph 17 02651 g004
Ijerph 17 02651 g005 550
Figure 5. Sample standard deviations of the thermal effect on epithelial, connective tissue and complete tissue. Values expressed in μm.
Figure 5. Sample standard deviations of the thermal effect on epithelial, connective tissue and complete tissue. Values expressed in μm.
Ijerph 17 02651 g005
Table
Table 1. Clinical history of the patients.
Table 1. Clinical history of the patients.
PatientSexAgeMedical HistoryDrugsSmokeSiteClinical Suspicion
1.M15Nothing To ReportNONOVestibular interdental papillaPyogenic Granuloma
2.F63Celiac’s Disease, Uterine FibromasNONOTip of the tongueIperplafocal Fibrous Hyperplasiasia
3.F42Nothing To ReportBirth Control Pill3 per day for 25 yearsKeratinized Vestibular GingivaPyogenic Granuloma
4.M43Hypercholesterolemia, Kidney Stones, PsoriasisHypercholesterolemia Medication, Anti-PsoriaticNORight buccal mucosaFocal Fibrous Hyperplasia
5.F60Hypertension Antihypertensive Drug25 per day for 47 yearsRight buccal mucosaFocal Fibrous Hyperplasia
6.F69Nothing To ReportNONOTip of the Tongue (2 lesions)Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia
7.M63Pneumothorax, Inguinal HerniaNO10 per day for 30 yearsSoft palateSquamous Papilloma
8.F60Hypertension, Sjogren’s syndrome NONOHard palateSquamous Papilloma
9.F72Hypertension, Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease, ObesityAntihypertensive Drugs, DiureticNORight buccal mucosa– right upper archFocal Fibrous Hyperplasia
Table
Table 2. The thermal effect obtained in each specimen for both epithelium and connective tissue.
Table 2. The thermal effect obtained in each specimen for both epithelium and connective tissue.
CaseHistological DiagnosisEpithelial Thermal Effect (μm)Connective Tissue Thermal Effect (μm)Tissue Thermal Effect (μm)
1.Giant Cell Granuloma898.7 ± 311.96217.5 ± 264.231116.2 ± 505.37
2.Squamous Papilloma136.1 ± 311.96181.7 ± 264.23317.8 ± 505.37
3.Pyogenic Granuloma831.5 ± 311.96926.9 ± 264.231758.2 ± 505.37
4.Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia690.8 ± 311.96555.3 ± 264.231246.1 ± 505.37
5.Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia1188 ± 311.96585.5 ± 264.231773.5 ± 505.37
6.(1)Pyogenic Granuloma666.8 ± 311.96828.4 ± 264.231495.2 ± 505.37
6.(2)Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia331.7 ± 311.96266.1 ± 264.23597.8 ± 505.37
7.Squamous Papilloma477.1 ± 311.96248.4 ± 264.23725.5 ± 505.37
8.Squamous Papilloma427.1 ± 311.96311.7 ± 264.23738.8 ± 505.37
9.Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia861.5 ± 311.96559.2 ± 264.231420.7 ± 505.37

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palaia, G.; Pergolini, D.; D’Alessandro, L.; Carletti, R.; Del Vecchio, A.; Tenore, G.; Di Gioia, C.R.T.; Romeo, U. Histological Effects of an Innovative 445 Nm Blue Laser During Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082651

AMA Style

Palaia G, Pergolini D, D’Alessandro L, Carletti R, Del Vecchio A, Tenore G, Di Gioia CRT, Romeo U. Histological Effects of an Innovative 445 Nm Blue Laser During Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(8):2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082651

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palaia, Gaspare, Daniele Pergolini, Leonardo D’Alessandro, Raffaella Carletti, Alessandro Del Vecchio, Gianluca Tenore, Cira Rosaria Tiziana Di Gioia, and Umberto Romeo. 2020. "Histological Effects of an Innovative 445 Nm Blue Laser During Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 8: 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082651

APA Style

Palaia, G., Pergolini, D., D’Alessandro, L., Carletti, R., Del Vecchio, A., Tenore, G., Di Gioia, C. R. T., & Romeo, U. (2020). Histological Effects of an Innovative 445 Nm Blue Laser During Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop