Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Geography and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Evaluation of the PLE Functions of Territorial Space
2.3.2. Characteristics of the Functional Differentiation of Territorial Space
2.3.3. Coordination Features of Territory Spatial Functions
2.3.4. Spatial Autocorrelation Characteristics
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Distribution Characteristics of PLE Functions in Territorial Space within the Year
3.2. Interannual Variation Characteristics of the PLE Functions of Territorial Space
3.2.1. Production Function
3.2.2. Living Function
3.2.3. Ecological Function
3.3. Analysis of the Coordination Characteristics of PLE Functions in Territorial Space
3.4. Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis of Functional Coordination Degree
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- During the study period, the value of territorial production function increased. The value of production function in the main grain-producing areas located in the eastern Huang-Huai-Hai Plain decreased slowly. The change in land production function is mainly reduced. Overall, the living function is lower in the west and higher in the east. The growth rate of urban living space is significantly higher than that of rural living space. The rural economic development speed is slow, but the growth rate of urban living space is fast, and the characteristics of urban-rural dualization are distinct. The ecological function values of Funiu Mountain in the west, South Taihang Mountain in the north, and Tongbai Dabie Mountain in the north are relatively high. However, the ecological environment and service functions of the region are gradually declining over time. Affected by the economic development strategies of Henan Province at different stages, the pattern of land use has changed, and this is reflected in the changes in the spatial function. In the latter period (2005–2018), the change in production function is significantly better than the previous period (1990–2005). The living function in two periods maintains the characteristics of continuous expansion. The spatial regularity distribution of ecological function was weak, and the overall environmental conditions become worse than before;
- (2)
- The system of territorial space is a complex system composed of multiple factors with PLE functions as its core function. The interaction and influence of the functions of PLE functions have made economic and social transformations. The transformation of economic and social development has shifted the development model of territorial space from production-oriented to integrated coordination of PLE. This synergy relationship is the mirror of the degree of coupling and coordination. For a long time, the development model of some areas in Henan Province at the expense of the environment and the extensive use of resources has resulted in a large area of land in the middle and low coordination types. With the new wave of rapid economic development, the area of middle and low coordination areas has increased;
- (3)
- The status of regional differences in functional coordination is vital to formulate regional strategies for territorial spatial planning. For a long time, the agglomeration of territory spatial functions was weak, but still shows outstanding agglomeration characteristics. High-high and low-low are the main types of local autocorrelation. The two counties at different periods are all in the high-high clustering state. The low-low clustering state of Lushi County, Ruyang County, Xinxian County, and Shangcheng County is mainly in the western and southern mountainous areas of Henan Province. Therefore, these regions need to strengthen the territory spatial control.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tian, F.; Li, M.; Han, X.; Liu, H.; Mo, B. A Production–Living–Ecological Space Model for Land-Use Optimisation: A case study of the core Tumen River region in China. Ecol. Model. 2020, 437, 109310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of ‘production-living-ecological’ spaces in China. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 72, 1290–1304. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, G.; Jiang, D.; Fu, J.; Cao, C.; Zhang, D. Spatial Conflict of Production–Living–Ecological Space and Sustainable-Development Scenario Simulation in Yangtze River Delta Agglomerations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Hu, X. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China’s southeast coast. Habitat Int. 2020, 100, 102182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baja, S.; Pulubuhu, D.A.T.; Neswati, R.; Arif, S. Nurmiaty Land Use Conflict with a Particular Reference to Spatial Planning Implementation in South Sulawesi. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 279, 012006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lema, M.A.; Majule, A.E. Impacts of climate change, variability and adaptation strategies on agriculture in semi-arid areas of Tanzania: The case of Manyoni District in Singida Region, Tanzania. Afr. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 3, 206–218. [Google Scholar]
- Zou, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y. Land use conflict identification and sustainable development scenario simulation on China’s southeast coast. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duh, J.D.; Daniel, G.B. Knowledge-informed Pareto simulated annealing for multiobjective spatial allocation. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2007, 31, 253–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslan, T.A.; Kirmikil, M.; Gündoğdu, K.S.; Arici, I. Reallocation model for land consolidation based on landowners’ requests. Land Use Policy 2018, 70, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sifa, O.; Harun, U.; Huseyin, H. Implementation of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for interview problem in land consolidation: A case study in Konya/Turkey. Land Use Policy 2021, 108, 105511. [Google Scholar]
- Tomal, M. Evaluation of coupling coordination degree and convergence behaviour of local development: A spatiotemporal analysis of all Polish municipalities over the period 2003–2019. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 71, 102992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godschalk, D.R. Land use planning challenges-coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2004, 70, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daur, N.; Adam, Y.O.; Pretzsch, J. A historical political ecology of forest access and use in Sudan: Implications for sustainable rural livelihoods. Land Use Policy 2016, 58, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duinker, P.N.; Greig, L.A. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2007, 27, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, E.D.; Doughty, C.L.; Lowe, J.; Cooper, M.; Sloane, E.B.; Bram, D.L. Establishing Targets for Regional Coastal Wetland Restoration Planning Using Historical Ecology and Future Scenario Analysis: The Past, Present, Future Approach. Estuar. Coasts 2020, 43, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Bao, W.; Liu, Y. Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 117, 106512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharafatmandrad, M.; Khosravi Mashizi, A. Investigating tradeoffs between supply, use and demand of ecosystem services and their effective drivers for sustainable environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 289, 112534. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, G.; Glanz, H. Identifying potential NIMBY and YIMBY effects in general land use planning and zoning. Applied. Geogr. 2018, 99, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengochea, D.; Henderson, K.; Loreau, M. Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Mod. 2020, 437, 109312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maria, L.P.; Cesare, P.M.; Laurence, M.; Marta, P.S. An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, L.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, B. Land use transformation and its eco-environmental response in process of the regional development: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2013, 33, 1442–1449. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Z.; Xu, E.; Zhang, H.; Shang, E. Spatio-Temporal Coordination and Conflict of Production-Living-Ecology Land Functions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China. Land 2020, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeFries, R.S.; Foley, J.A.; Asner, G.P. Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S. Uneven growth and regional sustainable development-research on the development structure of Henan Province. Resourc. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2010, 19, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Kang, Y. Land assessment division research on economic development in Henan province. Geogr. Res. 2015, 34, 2320–2328. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, G.; Raymond, C. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 122, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, J.; Liu, J.; Kuang, W.; Xu, X.; Zhang, S.; Yan, C.; Li, R.; Wu, S.; Hu, Y.; Du, G.; et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bai, R.S.; Jiang, Y.P.; Jiang, J.D. Analyzing spatial distribution patterns of ecological-production-living spaces of Jianghuai Urban Agglomeration. China Anc. City. 2016, 10, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
- Tunçay, T.; Bayramin, I.; Atalay, F.; Ünver, I. Assessment of Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) Interpolation on Spatial Variability of Selected Soil Properties in the Cukurova Plain. Tarım Bilim. Derg. 2016, 22, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, H.; Song, G.; Zhang, H. Identification of production-living-ecological space at Keshan County level in main grain-producing areas in northern Songnen Plain, China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 264–271. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, A.S.; Vilela, V.M.d.F.N.; Rizzo, R.; West, P.; Gerber, J.S.; Engstrom, P.M.; Ballester, M.V.R. Assessing land use/cover dynamics and exploring drivers in the Amazon’s arc of deforestation through a hierarchical, multi-scale and multi-temporal classification approach. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2019, 15, 100233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, P.; Li, J.; Shi, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, R. Spatial and temporal changes of land use pattern and ecological risk assessment in Zhejiang Province. Resourc. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2018, 27, 2697–2706. [Google Scholar]
- Shan, W.; Jin, X.; Ran, N.; Fan, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Y. ‘Production-Living-Ecological’ function evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of land use in Jiangsu Province. Resourc. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2019, 28, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar]
- Moctezuma, V. Spatial autocorrelation in a Mexican dung beetle ensemble: Implications for biodiversity assessment and monitoring. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Land Use Classification System | Production Function | Living Function | Ecological Function | Land Use Classification System | Production Function | Living Function | Ecological Function |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 (Irrigated field) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 43 (Reservoir and pond) | 1 | 0 | 1 |
12 (Dry land) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 46 (Beach land) | 0 | 0 | 5 |
21 (Forestland) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 51 (Urban land) | 5 | 5 | 0 |
22 (Shrub land) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 52 (Rural settlements) | 5 | 5 | 0 |
23 (Open wood land) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 53 (Other construction lands) | 5 | 0 | 0 |
24 (Other woodlands) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 61 (Sandy land) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
31 (High-coverage meadow) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 63 (Gobi) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
32 (Medium-coverage meadow) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 64 (Saline land) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
33 (Low-coverage meadow) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 65 (Bare land) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
41 (river and canal) 42 (Lakes) | 0 0 | 0 0 | 5 5 | 66 (rock land) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
67 sup(Other land) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fu, J.; Zhang, S. Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158051
Fu J, Zhang S. Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(15):8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158051
Chicago/Turabian StyleFu, Jianchun, and Shaoliang Zhang. 2021. "Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 15: 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158051
APA StyleFu, J., & Zhang, S. (2021). Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158051