Next Article in Journal
Changes in the Impacts of Topographic Factors, Soil Texture, and Cropping Systems on Topsoil Chemical Properties in the Mountainous Areas of the Subtropical Monsoon Region from 2007 to 2017: A Case Study in Hefeng, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping Research Conducted on Long-Term Care Facilities for Older People in Brazil: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Child-Related Factors on Caregiver Perceptions of Their Child’s Sustained Participation in a Community Football Program: A Study of Children with and without Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Personal and Work-Related Factors Associated with Good Care for Institutionalized Older Adults
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Pilot Study to Develop and Test Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Nursing Homes

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(2), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020829
by Charlèss Dupont 1,2,*, Robrecht De Schreye 1, Joachim Cohen 1,2, Mark De Ridder 3, Lieve Van den Block 1,2, Luc Deliens 1,2,4 and Kathleen Leemans 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(2), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020829
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 15 January 2021 / Published: 19 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In my opinion, the authors present a good study for measuring the quality of palliative care for nursing homes. The methods were described in detail and the authors developed the indicators thoroughly which can make a good criteria for assessing the palliative care quality.

I have only two suggestions:

in line 94-98, the authors should describe more specific of where the literature is searched (pubmed? Embase?) or what existing indicators are.

In line 244, “Domain: Psychological, social or spiritual aspects of care” should be in gray background.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Please summarize the process and results of phase 1 and phase 2 briefly in the rection of results ( line 229 ).
  2. Please check the typing of headings in Table 2 , Table 3 , and the Domain in Table 4.
  3. Some of the thematic domains between Table 2 and Table 4 are different. The reasons have to be described in the text.
  4. The overview of the characteristics of the residents in Table 5 have to be described briefly.
  5. The themes of this research reinforced autonomy and dignity of the nursing home residents ( lines 293-294 ) , it needs to be discussed further.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Some sections of the manuscript are difficult to follow. It may be useful to present tools and results in a more concise way.

 

The search for a tool on palliative care is fundamental to improve the quality of care and life expectancy. The work is well structured, however a more schematic presentation of the research and results would be needed.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop