Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand, and Balance of Urban Green Spaces in a Typical Mountainous City: A Case Study on Chongqing, China
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Digital Case Management Tool for Community Based Inclusive Development Program
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Is a New Challenge for the Effectiveness of Global Vaccination Campaign: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature

by
Lorenzo Lo Muzio
1,2,*,
Mariateresa Ambosino
1,
Eleonora Lo Muzio
3 and
Mir Faeq Ali Quadri
4
1
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 70122 Foggia, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Bio-Oncologia (C.I.N.B.O.), 66100 Chieti, Italy
3
Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
4
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 82511, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 11001; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182011001
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 3 October 2021 / Accepted: 9 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021

Abstract

:
Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 seems to be a rare phenomenon. The objective of this study is to carry out a systematic search of literature on the SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in order to understand the success of the global vaccine campaigns. A systematic search was performed. Inclusion criteria included a positive RT-PCR test of more than 90 days after the initial test and the confirmed recovery or a positive RT-PCR test of more than 45 days after the initial test that is accompanied by compatible symptoms or epidemiological exposure, naturally after the confirmed recovery. Only 117 articles were included in the final review with 260 confirmed cases. The severity of the reinfection episode was more severe in 92/260 (35.3%) with death only in 14 cases. The observation that many reinfection cases were less severe than initial cases is interesting because it may suggest partial protection from disease. Another interesting line of data is the detection of different clades or lineages by genome sequencing between initial infection and reinfection in 52/260 cases (20%). The findings are useful and contribute towards the role of vaccination in response to the COVID-19 infections. Due to the reinfection cases with SARS-CoV-2, it is evident that the level of immunity is not 100% for all individuals. These data highlight how it is necessary to continue to observe all the prescriptions recently indicated in the literature in order to avoid new contagion for all people after healing from COVID-19 or becoming asymptomatic positive.

1. Introduction

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak since December 2019 has continued to exhibit devastating consequences, and was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in early 2020 [1,2,3]. To date, as of 17 October 2021, 240,421,359 infections have been confirmed, with 4,895,034 deaths [4]. In many countries, the vaccination campaign has started with the use of various vaccines recently put on the market and the total number of vaccine doses administered is 6,609,632,994. However, a new problem is emerging with regard to the evolution of the behavior of SARS-CoV-2: the possibility of reinfection of healed subjects after the first infection. On 25 August 2020, the first case of reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 was reported in international literature [5]. This event pointed out that infection by this virus does not uniformly confer protective immunity to all infected individuals [6]. Therefore, several critical questions are intriguing the researchers. Is SARS-CoV-2 reinfection a widespread phenomenon or is it limited to few subjects with immune deficits or specific comorbidities [6]? Can this phenomenon be due to a too weak, too short, or too narrow natural immune response to SARS-CoV-2, that is unable to protect from subsequent exposure [6]? What is the clinical behavior, in regard to the evolution of the reinfections? Can these reinfected patients transmit the viruses? This important problem needs to be addressed, because the possibility of reinfection could drastically reduce the effectiveness of the vaccination campaigns in progress. Protective, sustainable and long-lasting immunity following COVID-19 infection is uncertain, but it is essential for the efficacity of vaccine strategy.
For some viruses, the first infection can provide lifelong immunity, for seasonal coronaviruses protective immunity is short-lived [7]. Over the years, other viruses responsible for various infectious respiratory diseases have been able to present reinfection in the originally cured subjects, such as the coronavirus HCoV-NL63 (NL63) [8] and the human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) [9].
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic poses a challenge regarding the follow-up of recovered patients and the question of the reinfection risk. Several reports confirmed that most patients with SARS-CoV-2 produce antibodies against spike and N-proteins of the virus within 30 days after the infection [10,11]. In fact, an outbreak of the virus on a fishery vessel showed that fishers with prior neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were not reinfected [12]. The potential mechanisms that mediate immunity post-COVID-19 are not yet fully understood. COVID-19 typically follows a course similar to other respiratory viral illnesses, and it is self-limiting in more than 80% of cases [13]. An innate immune response involving T cells and B cells is activated, leading to the production of neutralizing antiviral antibodies [13]. The specific IgM antibody response starts to peak within the first 7 days [13]. Specific IgG and IgA antibodies develop a few days after IgM and are hypothesized to persist at low levels, conferring lifelong protective antibodies [14]. While this hypothesis may hold true for symptomatic patients, emerging data have revealed negative IgM and IgG during the early convalescent phase in asymptomatic patients [15] and 40% of asymptomatic patients became seronegative for IgG 8 weeks after discharging compared with 12.9% who were seronegative for the symptomatic group [15]. A seronegative status could leave open the possibility of reinfection. Immunosuppression and comorbid diseases can be other risk factors for a reinfection [16].
However, a distinction must be made between prolonged shedding/reactivation and true reinfection [17], in fact one of the features of SARS-CoV-2 infection is prolonged virus shedding. Several studies reported persistent or recurrent elimination of viral RNA in nasopharyngeal samples starting from first contact with a positive subject [18,19,20]. For this reason, recently the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a guidance protocol designed to identify cases of real SARS-CoV-2 reinfection [21]. This guidance defines some criteria about sequencing parameters, epidemiological data and laboratory diagnostic data (Table 1). Specifically, investigative criteria include a positive RT-PCR test more than 90 days after the initial test in healed patients or a positive RT-PCR test more than 45 days after the initial test that is accompanied by compatible symptoms or epidemiological exposure, after confirmed healing.
Another emerging problem that can influence the possibility of reinfection and the vaccination efficacity is the new variants of SARS-CoV-2, such us alpha, beta, gamma and delta. A recent study on 9119 patients with SAS-CoV-2 infection identified reinfection in 63 cases (0.7%, 95% confidence interval 0.5–0.9%) [22]. The mean period between two positive tests was 116 ± 21 days [22]. There were no significant differences based on age or sex, while nicotine dependence/tobacco use, asthma were higher in patients with reinfection [22]. There was a significantly lower rate of pneumonia, heart failure, and acute kidney injury during reinfection compared with primary infection [22]. There were two deaths (3.2%) associated with reinfection [22].
Another study conducted in Switzerland reported five cases of reinfection (1%) in 498 seropositive individuals followed for 35 weeks [23]. Breathnach et al. examined data of 10,727 patients with COVID-19 in the first wave and individuated eight reinfection cases (0.07%), all in female patients, and only one was admitted in hospital [24]. Bongiovanni et al. examined 677 subjects with at least a positive nasopharyngeal swab, 328 during the first wave and 349 during the second individuating 13 (1.9%) cases of reinfection [25]. Vitale et al. examined a cohort of 1579 patients and reported five reinfections (0.31%, 95% CI, 0.03–0.58%), of whom only one was hospitalized and the mean (SD) interval between primary infection and reinfection was longer than 230 (90) days [26].
The understanding of COVID-19 reinfection will be key in guiding government and public health policy decisions in the coming months.
A systematic review of literature was performed in order to individuate cases of reinfection for SARS-CoV-2. To date there are more than 300 reported cases of COVID-19 reinfection from different countries such as United States [27], Ecuador [28], Hong Kong [5], and Belgium [29]. It is necessary to understand if all these cases are really reinfection.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review of literature on reinfections of SARS-CoV-2 was conducted in August 2021. Our study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist to ensure the reliability and validity of this study and results.

2.1. Data Sources

By application of a systematic search and using the keywords in the online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and preprint servers (MedRxiv, BioRxiv, and SSRN) on 31 July 2021, we extracted all the papers published in English from December 2019 to July 2021. We included several combinations of keywords in the following orders to conduct the search strategy: (1) “CoVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” or “2019-nCoV” [all field]; (2) “Reinfection” or “Re-infection” [all field].

2.2. Study Selection

Three independent investigators retrieved the studies that were the most relevant by titles and abstracts (ELM, LLM, MA). Subsequently, the full text of the retrieved papers was reviewed, and the most relevant papers were chosen according to the eligibility criteria. Then, we extracted the relevant data and organized them in tables. The original papers that were peer-reviewed and published in English and fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the final report, together with two works not reviewed at the time of preparation of this report [30,31].
The following inclusion criteria was used: a positive RT-PCR test carried out more than 90 days after the initial test in healed patients or a positive RT-PCR test carried out more than 45 days after the initial test that is accompanied by compatible symptoms or epidemiological exposure, after confirmed healing. This criteria corresponds to the CDC protocol designed to identify cases of real SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (Table 1) [32].
We considered the exclusion criteria for this study as follows: (1) papers conveying non-human studies including in vitro observations or articles focusing on animal experiments; (2) papers in which their full text were out of access; (3) any suspicious and duplicated results in the databases.

2.3. Data Extraction

After summarizing, we transferred the information of the authors, type of article (e.g., case reports), publication date, country of origin, age, gender, and clinical symptoms to a data extraction sheet. Three independent investigators collected this information and subsequently organized them in the tables. Finally, to ensure no duplications or overlap existed in the content, all the selected articles were cross-checked by other authors.

2.4. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment

As aforementioned, we applied the PRISMA checklist to ensure the quality and reliability of selected articles. Two independent researchers evaluated the consistency and quality of the articles and the risk of bias. In either case of discrepancy in viewpoints, a third independent researcher resolved the issue. The full text of selected articles was read, and the key findings were extracted.
Included studies underwent quality check and risk of bias assessment. This qualitative analysis was performed according Murad’s quality checklist of case series and case report [33]. As reported, the scale consists of four parameters, to evaluate the (a) patient selection; (b) exposure ascertainment; (c) causality; (d) reporting. Each section contains one to four question to be addressed. As it is suggested we performed an overall judgement about methodological quality since questions 4, 5 and 6 are mostly relevant to cases of adverse drug events. Each requested field will be considered as adequate, inadequate or not evaluable. The table showing this tool for evaluating the methodological quality of case reports and case series, is reported in the original manuscript [33].

3. Results

In this study, 117 documents were identified using the systematic search strategy. After a primary review of 2201 retrieved articles, 379 duplicates were removed, and the title and abstract of the remaining 1822 resources were reviewed. After applying the selection criteria, only 117 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review (Figure 1). Therefore, the cases confirmed according to these parameters were 260 (Table 2).

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Features of Reinfection Cases

Reinfection occurred across the world: 1 case from Austria, 1 from Bahrain, 5 from Bangladesh, 2 from Belgium, 31 from Brazil, 3 from China including 1 from Hong Kong, 2 from Colombia, 28 from the Czech Republic, 1 from Denmark, 2 from Ecuador, 10 from France, 2 from Gambia, 1 from Germany, 24 from India, 31 from Iran, 12 from Iraq, 1 from Israel, 5 from Italy, 1 from Japan, 1 from Lebanon, 1 from Libya, 4 from Mexico, 5 from Pakistan, 1 from Panama, 1 from Peru, 1 from Portugal, 6 from Qatar, 1 from South Korea, 1 from Switzerland, 8 from Saudi Arabia, 1 from South Africa, 9 from Spain, 1 from the Netherlands, 4 from Turkey, 9 from the United Kingdom, 42 from the United States of America (Figure 2).
Age was reported in 237 cases: 5/237 patients (2.1%) were between 0 and 20 years old, 95/237 (40%) between 21 and 40 years old, 83/237 (35%) between 41 and 60, 42/237 (17%) between 61 and 80, and 12/237 (5%) > 80 years old (Figure 3).
Gender was reported in 251/260 cases, among which 115/251 patients (45.8%) were female and 136/251 (54.2%) were male (Figure 4).
The main risk groups were healthcare workers and patients with comorbidities. In total, 66/260 cases (2.3%) occurred among high risk groups, including healthcare workers (HCWs), doctors, students and nursing resident. A total of 91 cases (35%) occurred among patients with comorbidities, 48 in men and 38 in woman (Figure 5).
The evolution of the reinfection episode itself was more severe in 92/260 (35.3%) cases with the death only in 14/260 cases (5.3%), 7/260 male (2.65%) and 7/260 females (2.65%); 8 of these had a neoplastic immune system diseases, or transplant or other important comorbidities and 3 were over 80 years old (Figure 6).
Notably, reinfection occurred among patients whose initial infections were both asymptomatic/mild, 80% (207/260), and moderate/severe, 20% (53/260). The demonstration that moderate/severe initial infections do not necessarily provide enhanced protection against reinfection is important because patients with more severe infection have been found to have higher neutralizing antibody titers, which may be expected to confer protection. Additionally of note, the severity of the reinfection episode itself was less in 21/53 cases (40%). The observation that many reinfection cases were less severe than initial cases is interesting because it may suggest partial protection from disease [152] and argues against antibody-dependent immune enhancement, which can be seen with other viral pathogens. In the absence of routine surveillance, we would have expected a bias toward detection of symptomatic reinfection, underscoring the importance of prospective screening.
Another interesting datapoint is the detection of different clades or lineages detected by genome sequencing between initial infection and reinfection in 52/260 cases (20%). The current gold standard for identifying reinfection is detection of a distinct virus by genome sequencing. Detection of reinfection is most straightforward when viruses belong to a different clade or lineage, as this provides clear evidence of infection by a different virus [6]. Although reinfection is most apparent when viruses are different enough to distinguish by genome sequencing, it remains unclear whether these viral genomic differences play a causative role in reinfection. That is, does reinfection occur when viral genomic differences permit escape from an existing, but narrow, immune response to the initial infection? Answering this question will require detailed mapping of the relationship between virus substitutions and immune escape.

3.2. Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment

Briefly, only 14 studies fulfilled the quality checklist. “Selection—Does the patient(s) represent(s) the whole experience of the investigator (center) or is the selection method unclear to the extent that other patients with similar presentation may not have been reported?” checklist resulted unclear in most of the studies, because the patient selection method was unclear. In general, overall quality was satisfactory in all included studies.

4. Discussion

Since the first cases, a question has haunted all researchers: can a patient recovered from COVID-19 get sick again? The first confirmed case of reinfection occurred in a 33-year-old Caucasian man of Hong Kong, that was admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 on 23 March 2020 [5]. After two negative tests by RT-PCR on days 21 and 22 he was discharged from the hospital and resumed his usual work [5]. Serological controls after the first infection showed that he did not produce virus neutralizing antibodies [139]. On 15 August 2020 after a 1-week trip in Spain, the patient returned to Hong Kong and was submitted to a collection of a deep throat saliva sample for RT-PCR as border surveillance and resulted positive [5]. The patient was asymptomatic until the new negative test. The viruses from the first and the second infection were phylogenetically distinct and the virus of first infection had a truncation in the 58AA open reading frame 8 gene, that could be responsible immune evasion [138]. However T cells and mucosal immunity might have played an important role in resolving the second infection, even if there was the absence of primary neutralizing antibodies [139].
In October 2020, Tillett et al. reported the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the USA [27]. A 25-year-old man from Nevada, without known immune disorders, had PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in April, 2020 (cycle threshold (Ct) value 35·24; specimen A) [27]. He recovered in quarantine, testing negative by RT-PCR at two consecutive timepoints thereafter [27]. However, 48 days after the initial test, the patient tested positive again by RT-PCR (Ct value 35·31; specimen B) [27]. Viral genome sequencing showed that both specimens A and B belonged to clade 20C, a predominant clade seen in northern Nevada [27]. The genome sequences of isolates from the first infection (specimen A) and reinfection (specimen B) differed significantly, making the chance of the virus being from the same infection very small [27]. The particularity of this report is that SARS-CoV-2 reinfection resulted in worse disease than the first infection, requiring oxygen support and hospitalization [27]. The patient had positive antibodies after the reinfection, but whether he had pre-existing antibody after the first infection is unknown [27]. Both cases reported from Nevada and Hong Kong seem to confirm the possibility that the reinfections are due to a different variant of SARS-CoV-2.
The first important question to be answered is: are all cases reported in the literature as reinfection by SARS-COV-2 true reinfections?
A distinction must be made between true reinfection, relapsed infection, recurrence of positive (re-positive) nucleic acid detection [17,153], in fact one of the features of SARS-CoV-2 infection is prolonged virus shedding. Several studies reported persistent or recurrent elimination of viral RNA in nasopharyngeal samples starting from first contact with a positive subject [18,19,20]. Several explanations can exist in order to explain this phenomenon without it being a true reinfection. One possible explanation for testing positive after a previously negative result could be that the negative results after patient recovery were really false-negative results [154]. Literature reported that false-negative rates can be as high as 30% for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing [155]. However, actually the KCDC (Korean Control Disease Center) determined recovery as two separate negative PCR results within 24 h [156]. In this way, patients positive after having two consecutive negative results would be positive for an increase in viral genetic material due to reinfection [156]. It is difficult to have two previous consecutive false-negative results [156]. Another possible explanation could be the contamination of the samples, but most testing centers are requiring testers to change personal protective equipment (e.g., gloves, gowns and masks) [156]. However, surely one of the main points to consider is the basis of PCR testing: the test is able to amplify nucleic acid in the sample, not fully active viral particles. The genetic material (RNA and DNA) left behind degrades over time [157]. Thus, positive PCR results after recovery may not necessarily signify reinfection, but rather the presence of leftover genetic material from previously active infection [156]. Therefore, a patient who retests positive for virus might not necessarily be experiencing a second, new SARS-CoV-2 infection [158]. True reinfection has criteria that must be considered, including isolation of the complete genome of the virus (and not just genomic fragments) in the second episode, identification of two different virus strains in two episodes of infection based on phylogenetic analysis; proof of virus infectivity in the second episode by virus isolation and evaluation of its cytopathic effect in cell culture; investigation of immune responses and their comparison in two episodes; epidemiologic data such as re-exposure history to COVID-19 patient in the second event and timing between episodes, with a longer time interval between two episodes favoring the reinfection hypothesis [17,159]. To date, positive retesting more than 83 days after the first positive test, along with other criteria, favors confirmation of reinfection, even if Turner et al. recently reported a patient with prolonged viral RNA shedding lasting 87 days after the initial positive clinical PCR test and 97 days after the onset of symptoms, probably due to the poor CD8+ T cell response during the first three months of his illness [160]. In addition to the abovementioned reasons, the disease clinical data are also useful in confirming the second episode, although the second episode may be asymptomatic [17]. A time interval where the patient is free of clinical signs between the two episodes is also necessary. In conclusion, only cases with clinical symptoms and RT-PCR positivity after negative tests following recovery from COVID-19 could be considered true SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. Recently Raveendran et al. suggested an interesting approach in order to individuate the reasons for a persistent RT-PCR positivity (Figure 7) [161]. According to this flow chart it is possible to individuate cases of persistent RT-PCR positivity due to reinfection or to presence of dead viral fragment or to persistent viral shedding.
The second important question to be answered is: can SARS-CoV-2 re-infect a patient after recovery?
When any unwanted virus comes into contact with our body, also in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, most patients are able to develop specific antibodies neutralizing the spike proteins of this virus [5]. A recent study of Pilz et al. pointed out that the relatively low tentative reinfection rate (40 cases in 14,840 COVID-19 survivors of first wave—0.27%) ensures a good protection after natural infection for SARS-CoV-2 [162]. However there are three main mechanisms for reinfection: the immune response can be ineffective, strain-specific, or short-lived [156].
Monoclonal antibodies formed against the SARS-CoV-2 virus target the Spike (S) glycoprotein component, the receptor-binding domain of the virion [156]. SARS-CoV-2, however, has been shown to develop “escape mutants,” or alterations, in the epitope of the S protein that contribute to host tropism and viral virulence [156]. Sui et al. reported that major variations exist in the S protein at positions 360, 479, and 487 [163]. They found that altering 1–2 amino acids at those positions led previously efficacious neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 to a 20–50% reduction in binding capacity [163]. Theoretically, if SARS-CoV-2 is also able to form “escape mutants” in the S protein, IgG antibodies formed in patients may be less ineffective, though not completely, in neutralizing the virus [156]. This could mean that patients remain resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection even after mutations, with antibody responses that are 50–80% efficacious [156].
Another possibility that could allow the reinfection of a patient is the duration of the body immune response [156]. Recent findings suggested that protective immunity does not occur in all infected individuals [164], supporting the possibility of reinfection [103], even if 93% of the infected produce neutralizing antibodies [165]. Their function is to prevent the virus from entering cells between 6 and 20 days after infection [166] with this mechanism: after the infection, B lymphocytes are activated and produce IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies. A subset of them (IgG and IgA) then manage to make the new viral particles harmless. The neutralizing antibodies, in turn, are accompanied by the activation of killer cells (T lymphocytes), specialized in recognizing and destroying the virus [167].
Seroconversion of IgM and IgG antibodies occurs the first week after onset of symptoms, seroconversion rates rise until the fourth week and decline thereafter, by the seventh week IgM antibodies are not detected in most cases, even if some reports showed IgM antibodies to persist for up to 8 months post-COVID-19 [168], whereas IgG antibodies persist longer for a period of time yet unknown [169]. Immunoglobulins alone are not truly sufficient to confer long-term immunity to coronavirus [156]. CD4+ T-cells and memory CD8+ T-cells with their products, such as effector cytokines and IFN-γ, are important in providing protection from coronavirus [170]. In fact, when the infection is over, in the following weeks or months, the antibodies drop: the virus is no longer there, they are no longer needed. However, the memory cells remain in the body, ready to intervene in case of need. All the studies so far show that a long-lasting immune response occurs. A very recent study carried out in collaboration between the Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia and the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm quantifies this “time” more precisely: memory cells persist for at least 6–8 months after infection [171]. Considering that the disease erupted just under a year ago, this is the maximum observation time possible to date, but it could be much longer [171]. Previous studies showed that virus-specific memory CD8+ T-cells were found to persist for up to 6 years after a SARS associated coronavirus infection, but memory B-cells and accompanying antibodies were undetectable at that time [172]. However Vetter et al. hypothesized that reinfection can be due to a loss of protection elicited after the first episode for a progressive reduction of protective antibody titers [144,173].
We can conclude that antibody formation and longevity of immunity in a subject could be dependent by the strain of virus, its severity and age of subject [174].
Khoshkam et al. tried to classify the recovered and immunized subjects in four categories:
(1)
Infected cases with very mild symptoms or asymptomatic without any humoral immune response or elicited memory.
(2)
Infected cases with mild to moderate symptoms with low humoral immunity and low cellular immunity.
(3)
Infected cases with moderate or severe symptoms with highly activated humoral immunity and elicited memory.
(4)
Infected cases with moderate or severe symptoms with highly activated humoral immunity and low cellular immunity [175].
They hypothesized that reinfection may happen in groups 1 and 2, which may also develop the severe disease in the future due to the absence or low levels of acquired immunity [175]. Individuals in group 3 are more protective against further exposures and they may show long-term immunity since they develop increased elicited memory in defense of SARS-CoV-2 [175]. The last group may show rapid response against reinfection; they may not be safe for longer periods because of the non-imprinted memory of immunity [175].
The question to be solved is whether these antibodies can neutralize each SARS-CoV-2 clade and guarantee immunity to subsequent contact. Reinfection from SARS-CoV-2 with a genetically distinct strain of SARS-CoV-2 is, in theory, possible in patients immediately after recovery from COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain, so more research is needed. SARS-CoV-2, even if it is a virus similar to that of the flu, seems to have a more stable genome and the response that the immune system generates is towards several fragments of the viral proteins and not just one. In fact, the mutations observed so far (and, perhaps, also the new English variant, at least until proven otherwise) are not associated with a change in the severity of the disease.
The new variants are accumulating mutations in different spike domains, such as the alpha variant or B.1.1.7 lineage (also known as 501Y.V1 or VOC202012/01), the beta variant or B.1.351 lineage (501Y.V2), the gamma variant or P.1 lineage (501Y.V3) and the delta variant or B.1.617.2 lineage [176]. All these variants have cumulated at least nine non-synonymous mutations/deletions throughout the Spike coding region. For example, the case reported by Harrington et al. showed that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were still present shortly before onset of reinfection, with no evidence of antibody waning [82]. This may raise some concerns about immune evasion by the alpha variant, which is a concern with the high number of spike region mutations seen. However, the study has a bias: there were no assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognizing spike antigen in the second reinfection, while the tested antibodies recognized “N” antigen, so it is difficult to point out an evident role of antibodies in the reinfection. The 501Y.V2 variant, or beta variant, is characterized by eight mutations in the spike protein-coding sequences that can improve its ability to transmission [151]. The case reported by Zucman et al. showed that beta variant can be more aggressive than non-VOC SARS-CoV-2 [151]. The last, the delta variant, is characterized by P681R and L452R mutations that can help the delta variant spread. For all these reasons it is necessary to investigate urgently the possibility of these new variants to escape the vaccine action. The immune responses generated by mRNA and adenoviral vector-based vaccines are restricted to the Spike glycoprotein, so new variants with big antigenic drift could reduce their efficiency and determine a growing number of reinfections.
Another possibility that could allow the reinfection of a patient is the reactivation of dormant virus which is commonly seen in immunosuppressed patients with some viruses, such as Epstein Barr, cytomegalovirus and herpes groups [90], but it is necessary to sequence viral genome for differential diagnosis between viral reactivation or reinfection with a different strain.
For all these reasons, it is important to identify cases of reinfection to understand if the “immunological memory” affects the symptoms during a second infection, a crucial fact, in particular, to predict the effectiveness of the vaccination campaign. If in the second time the symptoms are generally reduced, as in the Hong Kong [5], Belgium and the Netherlands [29] patients, this suggests that the immune system is responding as it should. However, if symptoms are consistently more severe during a second COVID-19 attack, as in the case of the Nevada [27] or Ecuador [28] subjects, it may be that the immune system makes matters worse. The mechanisms that could account for a more severe secondary infection can only be speculated. First, a very high dose of virus might have led to the second instance of infection and induced more severe disease [177]. Second, it is possible that reinfection was caused by a more virulent variant of the virus, or more virulent in this patient’s context [27]. Third, a mechanism of antibody-dependent enhancement might be the cause, a means by which specific Fc-bearing immune cells become infected with virus by binding to specific antibodies [27]. In fact, the clinical course of some severe COVID-19 cases has been worsened by abnormal immune responses that damage healthy tissue. Patients who experienced that problem during a first infection may have immune cells that are induced to respond disproportionately the second time too. Sometimes antibodies produced in response to SARS-CoV-2 can facilitate the virus during a second infection rather than fight it [178,179,180,181,182,183,184]. The phenomenon [185,186,187,188,189] is rare, but researchers have found worrying signs of it while trying to develop vaccines against the coronaviruses responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome [190] and against SARS-CoV-2 [191,192,193,194].
As researchers accumulate more examples of reinfection, the situation should become clearer. Depending on the criteria used, rates of reinfection can vary widely [195]. There are some reports about retrospective observational study such as that of Pilz et al. that reported 40 cases of tentative reinfection in Austria, but these data are limited by the lack of detailed clinical characteristics [162]. For this reason, in November 2020 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pointed out the following criteria to define reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (with Ct values < 33 if detected by RT-PCR) >90 days after the first detection of viral RNA whether or not symptoms were present and paired respiratory specimens from each episode that belong to different clades of virus or have genomes with >2 nucleotide differences per month [32]. Cases in which detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is present >45 days to 89 days apart are considered reinfections if the second symptomatic episode had no obvious alternate explanation for the COVID-19-like symptoms or there was close contact with a person known to have laboratory diagnosed COVID-19 and paired specimens are available with the Ct values and sequence diversity noted above.
However, the ability to re-infect does not mean that a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine cannot be effective. Some vaccines, for example, require a “booster” dose to maintain protection. Learning more about reinfection could help researchers in developing truly effective vaccines by showing them which immune responses are important for maintaining immunity. For example, researchers may find that people become vulnerable to reinfection after antibodies drop below a certain level, and so they can modify vaccination strategies accordingly using a booster dose to maintain that level of antibodies. At a time when health authorities are grappling with the dizzying logistical difficulties of vaccinating the world population against SARS-CoV-2, the need for a booster injection is a necessity that complicates the management of the vaccination campaign, but it does not make long-term immunity from SARS-CoV-2 impossible. However, some researchers fear that vaccines will only reduce symptoms during a second infection, rather than prevent it altogether. While giving some advantages, this possibility could turn vaccinated individuals into asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2, putting vulnerable populations at risk. The elderly, for example, are among the most affected by COVID-19, but they tend not to respond well to vaccines. For all these reasons, it would be interesting to see data on how much virus SARS-CoV-2 reinfected individuals spread.
The real problem to be solved is, therefore, the duration of immunity conferred by a COVID-19 episode. There is evidence in the literature that the COVID-19 immune response is variable and patient-specific with respect to the development of antibodies and to antibody persistence in serum over time [146]. In considering the protective effect of antibodies against a reinfection, the evidence is still inadequate, and more research is necessary in order to clarify the interplay between the roles of adaptive and innate immunity. A recent study of Gudbjartsson et al. reported that Icelandic humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection was persistent within the 120-day timeframe used with a modest decline in antibody titers after 120 days [196]. Iyer et al. observed declining antibody titers over 90 days, with “median times to sero-reversion of 71 and 49 days following symptom onset” [197].
The genetic analysis of all the new cases reported as reinfection would help in understanding if the reinfection would be due to a new infection by a different SARS-CoV-2 or a reinfection by the same virus for a decline of immune response, but unfortunately genomic analysis is not available for some of these cases.

5. Conclusions

All these findings are useful and contribute towards the role of vaccination in response to the COVID-19 infections. Collected data show a wide range of situations: spanning a broad distribution of ages, risk groups, baseline health status and reinfection severity compared to the initial infection. Reinfection occurred as early as 45 days or >300 days after the initial infection. Common explanations for reinfection can be either waning SARS-CoV-2 antibodies or the presence of viral escape mutations [198]. While several cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection did involve infection with a different clade, it is noteworthy that mutations were identified throughout the genomes and the frequency of mutations within the S gene was not elevated relative to the rest of the genome [199]. In addition, individuals with more severe reinfections did not have significantly greater frequency of S gene mutations [199]. Finally, the presence of rare mutations was uncommon in the re-infecting virus, which largely mirrored the contemporaneously circulating variants in the region of infection, as reported by Choudhary et al. [199]. Concerning the problem of recognizing reinfection and persistent infection, two factors generally differentiated them. First, reinfections have so far been largely described in immunocompetent individuals while the majority of persistent COVID cases have been in immunosuppressed patients [199]. Secondly, phylogenetic analysis can generally differentiate between reinfection and persistent infection, especially in cases where persistent infection allowed the longitudinal collection of >2 sequences [199]. Due to the reinfection cases with SARS-CoV-2, it is evident that the level of immunity is not 100% for all individuals. Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is a possibility in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, because vaccines to the virus may not translate to total immunity [199]. Recently breakthrough infections were reported following mRNA vaccination in healthy subjects [200,201], despite evidence of effective immune response among the breakthrough subjects [202]. Another study reported that eight symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in fully vaccinated healthcare workers (incidence rate 4.7 per 100,000 person-days adjusted) [203]. This type of challenge was also observed during the process of vaccine preparation for influenza [204]. Even though several vaccines are ready, the presence of more than 80 genotypical variants of the virus, possibility of reinfection, and short duration of seropositivity for neutralizing antibodies raise the concern that vaccination may not result in an effective and long-term immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, immunoglobulin levels may not correlate with viral shedding and risk of transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 [205]. Additionally, the short duration of immunity against the virus may not allow for increasing homogeneity of affected populations in a non-specific time frame. These factors raise concerns that eliminating the COVID-19 pandemic may not be as feasible as once assumed and that we must rely more on prevention of transmission until more aspects of the virus and its pathogenicity are discovered. A recent study suggested that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection [206]. In fact, among previously infected Kentucky residents, those who were not vaccinated were more than twice as likely to be reinfected compared with those with full vaccination [206]. Data from literature are comforting: out of hundreds of millions of people infected with the virus and then cured, only a few are reported cases of confirmed reinfection [199]. Despite the appearance of different variants of the virus, vaccines seem to help us for the near future. However, the presence of immunosuppressed or transplanted subjects requires us to continue to observe the precautionary rules useful to prevent the spread of the virus. In fact, it is imperative that all individuals, whether previously diagnosed with COVID-19 or not should take identical precautions to avoid reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 till the time when community immunity had been achieved [207]. All eligible persons should be offered vaccination, including those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, to reduce their risk for future infection [206].
This report highlights how it is necessary to continue to observe all the prescriptions recently indicated in the literature [208,209,210] in order to avoid new contagion for all patients after healed from COVID-19 or asymptomatic positive, since the infection does not ensure complete immunity in 100% of cases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.M.; methodology, L.L.M.; validation, E.L.M. and M.A.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, M.F.A.Q.; resources, L.L.M.; data curation, L.L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.M., M.A., E.L.M.; writing—review and editing, M.F.A.Q.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, L.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. World Health Organization. Rolling Updates on Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19). Health Emergencies. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  4. John Hopkins University. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Available online: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed on 17 October 2021).
  5. To, K.K.; Hung, I.F.; Ip, J.D.; Chu, A.W.; Chan, W.M.; Tam, A.R.; Fong, C.H.; Yuan, S.; Tsoi, H.W.; Ng, A.C.; et al. COVID-19 re-infection by a phylogenetically distinct SARS-coronavirus-2 strain confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, ciaa1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Babiker, A.; Marvil, C.E.; Waggoner, J.J.; Collins, M.H.; Piantadosi, A. The Importance and Challenges of Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e02769-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Edridge, A.W.D.; Kaczorowska, J.; Hoste, A.C.R.; Bakker, M.; Klein, M.; Loens, K.; Jebbink, M.F.; Matser, A.; Kinsella, C.M.; Rueda, P.; et al. Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1691–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kiyuka, P.K.; Agoti, C.N.; Munywoki, P.K.; Njeru, R.; Bett, A.; Otieno, J.R.; Otieno, G.P.; Kamau, E.; Clark, T.G.; van der Hoek, L.; et al. Human Coronavirus NL63 Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Patterns in Rural Coastal Kenya. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 217, 1728–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Glezen, W.P.; Taber, L.H.; Frank, A.L.; Kasel, J.A. Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1986, 140, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Perera, R.A.; Mok, C.K.; Tsang, O.T.; Lv, H.; Ko, R.L.; Wu, N.C.; Yuan, M.; Leung, W.S.; Chan, J.M.; Chik, T.S.; et al. Serological assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), March 2020. Eurosurveill 2020, 25, 2000421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Hachim, A.; Kavian, N.; Cohen, C.A.; Chin, A.W.H.; Chu, D.K.W.; Mok, C.K.P.; Tsang, O.T.Y.; Yeung, Y.C.; Perera, R.; Poon, L.L.M.; et al. ORF8 and ORF3b antibodies are accurate serological markers of early and late SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Addetia, A.; Crawford, K.H.D.; Dingens, A.; Zhu, H.; Roychoudhury, P.; Huang, M.L.; Jerome, K.R.; Bloom, J.D.; Greninger, A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e02107-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, R.; Sardar, S.; Mohammad Arshad, A.; Ata, F.; Zara, S.; Munir, W. A Patient with Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Who Presented 86 Days Later with COVID-19 Pneumonia Possibly Due to Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. Am. J. Case Rep. 2020, 21, e927154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Azkur, A.K.; Akdis, M.; Azkur, D.; Sokolowska, M.; van de Veen, W.; Bruggen, M.C.; O’Mahony, L.; Gao, Y.; Nadeau, K.; Akdis, C.A. Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and mechanisms of immunopathological changes in COVID-19. Allergy 2020, 75, 1564–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Long, Q.X.; Tang, X.J.; Shi, Q.L.; Li, Q.; Deng, H.J.; Yuan, J.; Hu, J.L.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, F.J.; et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amikishiyev, S.; Demir, E.; Aghamuradov, S.; Garayeva, N.; Artan, A.S.; Gul, A.; Turkmen, A. Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021, 23, e13695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Falahi, S.; Kenarkoohi, A. COVID-19 reinfection: Prolonged shedding or true reinfection? New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 38, 100812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiao, A.T.; Tong, Y.X.; Gao, C.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, S. Dynamic profile of RT-PCR findings from 301 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lan, L.; Xu, D.; Ye, G.; Xia, C.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Xu, H. Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 323, 1502–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Gombar, S.; Chang, M.; Hogan, C.A.; Zehnder, J.; Boyd, S.; Pinsky, B.A.; Shah, N.H. Persistent detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in patients and healthcare workers with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 129, 104477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Common Investigation Protocol for Investigating Suspected SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/reinfection.html (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  22. Qureshi, A.I.; Baskett, W.I.; Huang, W.; Lobanova, I.; Naqvi, S.H.; Shyu, C.R. Re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 in Patients Undergoing Serial Laboratory Testing. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leidi, A.; Koegler, F.; Dumont, R.; Dubos, R.; Zaballa, M.E.; Piumatti, G.; Coen, M.; Berner, A.; Darbellay Farhoumand, P.; Vetter, P.; et al. Risk of reinfection after seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2: A population-based propensity-score matched cohort study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Breathnach, A.S.; Riley, P.A.; Cotter, M.P.; Houston, A.C.; Habibi, M.S.; Planche, T.D. Prior COVID-19 significantly reduces the risk of subsequent infection, but reinfections are seen after eight months. J. Infect. 2021, 82, e11–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bongiovanni, M.; Marra, A.M.; Bini, F.; Bodini, B.D.; Carlo, D.D.; Giuliani, G. COVID-19 reinfection in healthcare workers: A case series. J. Infect. 2021, 82, e4–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vitale, J.; Mumoli, N.; Clerici, P.; De Paschale, M.; Evangelista, I.; Cei, M.; Mazzone, A. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection 1 Year After Primary Infection in a Population in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 1407–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tillett, R.L.; Sevinsky, J.R.; Hartley, P.D.; Kerwin, H.; Crawford, N.; Gorzalski, A.; Laverdure, C.; Verma, S.C.; Rossetto, C.C.; Jackson, D.; et al. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: A case study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prado-Vivar, B.; Becerra-Wong, M.; Guadalupe, J.J.; Marquez, S.; Gutierrez, B.; Rojas-Silva, P.; Grunauer, M.; Trueba, G.; Barragan, V.; Cardenas, P. A case of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Ecuador. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, e142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Elslande, J.; Vermeersch, P.; Vandervoort, K.; Wawina-Bokalanga, T.; Vanmechelen, B.; Wollants, E.; Laenen, L.; Andre, E.; Van Ranst, M.; Lagrou, K.; et al. Symptomatic Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Reinfection by a Phylogenetically Distinct Strain. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 354–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldman, J.D.; Wang, K.; Roltgen, K.; Nielsen, S.C.A.; Roach, J.C.; Naccache, S.N.; Yang, F.; Wirz, O.F.; Yost, K.E.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and Failure of Humoral Immunity: A case report. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Klein, J.; Brito, A.F.; Trubin, P.; Lu, P.; Wong, P.; Alpert, T.; Pena-Hernandez, M.A.; Haynes, W.; Kamath, K.; Liu, F.; et al. Case Study: Longitudinal immune profiling of a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a solid organ transplant recipient. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investigative Criteria for Suspected Cases of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection (ICR). Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/invest-criteria.html (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  33. Murad, M.H.; Sultan, S.; Haffar, S.; Bazerbachi, F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 2018, 23, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. World Health Organization. Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection When COVID-19 Is Suspected: Interim Guidance. 13 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf?sfvrsn=bc7da517_2 (accessed on 26 May 2020).
  35. Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Chemaitelly, H.; Malek, J.A.; Ahmed, A.A.; Mohamoud, Y.A.; Younuskunju, S.; Ayoub, H.H.; Al Kanaani, Z.; Al Khal, A.; Al Kuwari, E.; et al. Assessment of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in an intense re-exposure setting. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, e1830–e1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Adrielle Dos Santos, L.; Filho, P.G.G.; Silva, A.M.F.; Santos, J.V.G.; Santos, D.S.; Aquino, M.M.; de Jesus, R.M.; Almeida, M.L.D.; da Silva, J.S.; Altmann, D.M.; et al. Recurrent COVID-19 including evidence of reinfection and enhanced severity in thirty Brazilian healthcare workers. J. Infect. 2021, 82, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aguilar-Shea, A.L.; Gutierrez-Martin-Arroyo, J.; Vacas-Cordoba, M.; Gallardo-Mayo, C. Reinfection by SARS-CoV-2: The first one in a family reported in Spain. Med. Clin. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahmadian, S.; Fathizadeh, H.; Shabestari Khiabani, S.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Kafil, H.S. COVID-19 reinfection in a healthcare worker after exposure with high dose of virus: A case report. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e04257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmed, A.; Sana, F.; Ikram, A.; Yousaf, S.; Khan, A. Reinfection or relapse of COVID-19 in health care workers; case series of 2 patients from Pakistan. New Microbes New Infect. 2021, 42, 100896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ak, R.; Yilmaz, E.; Seyhan, A.U.; Doganay, F. Recurrence of COVID-19 Documented with RT-PCR. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2021, 30, S26–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aldossary, B.; Hassan, A.; Moussa, M.; Alsaif, H.S.; Alfaraj, D. Fulminant hepatic failure in a patient testing re-positive for SARS-CoV-2: A case report. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ali, A.M.; Ali, K.M.; Fatah, M.H.; Tawfeeq, H.M.; Rostam, H.M. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Patients Negative for Immunoglobulin G Following Recovery from COVID-19. New Microbes New Infect. 2021, 43, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. AlFehaidi, A.; Ahmad, S.A.; Hamed, E. SARS-CoV-2 re-infection: A case report from Qatar. J. Infect. 2021, 82, 414–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alshukairi, A.N.; El-Kafrawy, S.A.; Dada, A.; Yasir, M.; Yamani, A.H.; Saeedi, M.F.; Aljohaney, A.; AlJohani, N.I.; Bahaudden, H.A.; Alam, I.; et al. Re-infection with different SARS-CoV-2 clade and prolonged viral shedding in a patient with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: SARS-CoV-2 Re-infection with different clade. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 110, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Amorim, M.R.; Souza, W.M.; Barros, A.C.G., Jr.; Toledo-Teixeira, D.A.; Dos-Santos, K.B.; Simeoni, C.L.; Parise, P.L.; Vieira, A.; Forato, J.; Claro, I.M.; et al. Respiratory Viral Shedding in Healthcare Workers Reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, Brazil, 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1737–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arteaga-Livias, K.; Panduro-Correa, V.; Pinzas-Acosta, K.; Perez-Abad, L.; Pecho-Silva, S.; Espinoza-Sanchez, F.; Damaso-Mata, B.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. COVID-19 reinfection? A suspected case in a Peruvian patient. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 39, 101947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Atici, S.; Ek, O.F.; Yildiz, M.S.; Sikgenc, M.M.; Guzel, E.; Soysal, A. Symptomatic recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers recovered from COVID-19. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2021, 15, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Awada, H.; Nassereldine, H.; Hajj Ali, A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reinfection in a coronavirus disease 2019 recovered young adult: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bader, N.; Khattab, M.; Farah, F. Severe reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in a nursing home resident: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baiswar, S.; Mittal, R.; Tiwary, T.; Jinnur, P. Re-Positive SARS-CoV-2 With Respiratory Failure and Cerebrovascular Accident: Is This a Reinfection? Cureus 2021, 13, e15825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bellesso, M.; Bruniera, F.R.; Trunkel, A.T.; Nicodemo, I.P. Second COVID-19 infection in a patient with multiple myeloma in Brazil—Reinfection or reactivation? Hematol. Transfus. Cell Ther. 2021, 43, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bongiovanni, M. COVID-19 re-infection in an healthcare worker. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 93, 4058–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bonifacio, L.P.; Pereira, A.P.S.; Araujo, D.; Balbao, V.; Fonseca, B.; Passos, A.D.C.; Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F. Are SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and Covid-19 recurrence possible? a case report from Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2020, 53, e20200619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Borgogna, C.; De Andrea, M.; Griffante, G.; Lai, A.; Bergna, A.; Galli, M.; Zehender, G.; Castello, L.; Ravanini, P.; Cattrini, C.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a cancer patient with a defective neutralizing humoral response. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 6444–6446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brehm, T.T.; Pfefferle, S.; von Possel, R.; Kobbe, R.; Norz, D.; Schmiedel, S.; Grundhoff, A.; Olearo, F.; Emmerich, P.; Robitaille, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in a Healthcare Worker Despite the Presence of Detectable Neutralizing Antibodies. Viruses 2021, 13, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Buddingh, E.P.; Vossen, A.; Lamb, H.J.; van der Palen, R.L.F.; Brinkman, D.M.C. Reinfection With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Without Recurrence of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Caralis, P. Case Reports of COVID 19 Recurrence. J. Prim. Care Community Health 2021, 12, 2150132720982752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cavanaugh, A.M.; Thoroughman, D.; Miranda, H.; Spicer, K. Suspected Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Residents of a Skilled Nursing Facility During a Second COVID-19 Outbreak—Kentucky, July-November 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Colson, P.; Finaud, M.; Levy, N.; Lagier, J.C.; Raoult, D. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection with a different genotype. J. Infect. 2021, 82, 84–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Das, P.; Satter, S.M.; Ross, A.G.; Abdullah, Z.; Nazneen, A.; Sultana, R.; Rimi, N.A.; Chowdhury, K.; Alam, R.; Parveen, S.; et al. A Case Series Describing the Recurrence of COVID-19 in Patients Who Recovered from Initial Illness in Bangladesh. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Daw, M.A.; Daw, A.M.; Miftah, M.M.; El-Bouzedi, A.; Ahmed, M.O.; Libyan Study Group of COVID-19. Familial Clustering and Reinfection With 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) in the Libyan Community. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2021, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. de Brito, C.A.A.; Lima, P.M.A.; de Brito, M.C.M.; de Oliveira, D.B. Second Episode of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: Report of Two Cases. Int. Med. Case Rep. J. 2020, 13, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Diaz, Y.; Ortiz, A.; Weeden, A.; Castillo, D.; Gonzalez, C.; Moreno, B.; Martinez-Montero, M.; Castillo, M.; Vasquez, G.; Saenz, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with a virus harboring mutation in the Spike and the Nucleocapsid proteins in Panama. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dimeglio, C.; Herin, F.; Miedouge, M.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Soulat, J.M.; Izopet, J. Protection of healthcare workers against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dobano, C.; Ramirez-Morros, A.; Alonso, S.; Vidal-Alaball, J.; Ruiz-Olalla, G.; Vidal, M.; Rubio, R.; Cascant, E.; Parras, D.; Rodrigo Melero, N.; et al. Persistence and baseline determinants of seropositivity and reinfection rates in health care workers up to 12.5 months after COVID-19. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Duggan, N.M.; Ludy, S.M.; Shannon, B.C.; Reisner, A.T.; Wilcox, S.R. Is novel coronavirus 2019 reinfection possible? Interpreting dynamic SARSCoV-2 test results through a case report. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 39, 256.e1–256.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Elzein, F.; Ibrahim, A.; Alshahrani, F.; Mahrous, M.; Murshid, E.; Aldhehyan, T.; Almutiri, G.; Altowairqi, M.; Ahmed, M.; Alsaeed, M.; et al. Reinfection, recurrence, or delayed presentation of COVID-19? Case series and review of the literature. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fageeh, H.; Alshehri, A.; Fageeh, H.; Bizzoca, M.E.; Lo Muzio, L.; Quadri, M.F.A. Re-infection of SARS-CoV-2: A case in a young dental healthcare worker. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fabianova, K.; Kyncl, J.; Vlckova, I.; Jirincova, H.; Kostalova, J.; Liptakova, M.; Orlikova, H.; Sebestova, H.; Limberkova, R.; Mackova, B.; et al. COVID-19 reinfections. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2021, 70, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Fernandes, A.C.; Figueiredo, R. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection: A case report from Portugal. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2021, 54, e0002-2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ferrante, L.; Livas, S.; Steinmetz, W.A.; Almeida, A.C.L.; Leao, J.; Vassao, R.C.; Tupinambas, U.; Fearnside, P.M.; Duczmal, L.H. The First Case of Immunity Loss and SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection by the Same Virus Lineage in Amazonia. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2021, 8, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fintelman-Rodrigues, N.; da Silva, A.P.D.; Dos Santos, M.C.; Saraiva, F.B.; Ferreira, M.A.; Gesto, J.; Rodrigues, D.A.S.; Vale, A.M.; de Azevedo, I.G.; Soares, V.C.; et al. Genetic Evidence and Host Immune Response in Persons Reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fonseca, V.; de Jesus, R.; Adelino, T.; Reis, A.B.; de Souza, B.B.; Ribeiro, A.A.; Guimaraes, N.R.; Livorati, M.; Neto, D.F.L.; Kato, R.B.; et al. Genomic evidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection case with the emerging B.1.2 variant in Brazil. J. Infect. 2021, 5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Garduno-Orbe, B.; Sanchez-Rebolledo, J.M.; Cortes-Rafael, M.; Garcia-Jimenez, Y.; Perez-Ortiz, M.; Mendiola-Pastrana, I.R.; Lopez-Ortiz, E.; Lopez-Ortiz, G. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection among Healthcare Workers in Mexico: Case Report and Literature Review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021, 57, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Garg, J.; Agarwal, J.; Das, A.; Sen, M. Recurrent COVID-19 infection in a health care worker: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Garvey, M.I.; Casey, A.L.; Wilkinson, M.A.C.; Ratcliffe, L.; McMurray, C.; Stockton, J.; Holden, E.; Osman, H.; Loman, N.J. Details of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections at a major UK tertiary centre. J. Infect. 2021, 82, e29–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Goel, N.; Jain, D.; Haddad, D.B. Coronavirus Disease-19 and Re-infection: Unknown of the Unknown. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2021, 32, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gulati, K.; Prendecki, M.; Clarke, C.; Willicombe, M.; McAdoo, S. COVID-19 Reinfection in a Patient Receiving Immunosuppressive Treatment for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73, 1091–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gupta, V.; Bhoyar, R.C.; Jain, A.; Srivastava, S.; Upadhayay, R.; Imran, M.; Jolly, B.; Divakar, M.K.; Sharma, D.; Sehgal, P.; et al. Asymptomatic reinfection in two healthcare workers from India with genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Habadi, M.I.; Balla Abdalla, T.H.; Hamza, N.; Al-Gedeei, A. COVID-19 Reinfection. Cureus 2021, 13, e12730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hanif, M.; Haider, M.A.; Ali, M.J.; Naz, S.; Sundas, F. Reinfection of COVID-19 in Pakistan: A First Case Report. Cureus 2020, 12, e11176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Harrington, D.; Kele, B.; Pereira, S.; Couto-Parada, X.; Riddell, A.; Forbes, S.; Dobbie, H.; Cutino-Moguel, T. Confirmed Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 Variant VOC-202012/01. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hayes, B.; Stanley, J.; Peppers, B.P. COVID-19 Recurrence Without Seroconversion in a Patient With Mannose-Binding Lectin Deficiency. Allergy Rhinol. (Providence) 2021, 12, 21526567211024140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hunsinger, D.H.P.; Kutti Sridharan, D.G.; Rokkam, D.; Fantry, D.L.E. COVID-19 Reinfection in An Immunosuppressed Patient Without An Antibody Response. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 362, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hussein, N.R.; Musa, D.H.; Saleem, Z.S.M.; Naqid, I.A.; Ibrahim, N. Possible COVID-19 reinfection case in Duhok City, Kurdistan: A case report. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2021, 10, 2035–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hussein, N.R.; Rashad, B.H.; Almizori, L.A.; Yousif, S.S.; Sadeeq, A.T.; Abdulkareem, Y.R.; Mahmood, A.M.; Salih, Z.K. The Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Duhok city, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 13, e2021035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ibrahim, M.; Vegel, A.; Niu, A.; Panse, K.; Chen, R.; Safah, H.; Socola, F.; Luk, A.; Saba, N.S. Reinfection versus failure of viral clearance in a COVID-19 patient with hematologic malignancy. Leuk. Res. 2021, 101, 106514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Inada, M.; Ishikane, M.; Terada, M.; Matsunaga, A.; Maeda, K.; Tsuchiya, K.; Miura, K.; Sairenji, Y.; Kinoshita, N.; Ujiie, M.; et al. Asymptomatic COVID-19 re-infection in a Japanese male by elevated half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of neutralizing antibodies. J. Infect. Chemother. 2021, 27, 1063–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jain, A.; Kaur, J.; Rai, A.K.; Pandey, A.K. Anosmia: A Clinical Indicator of COVID-19 Reinfection. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021, 100, 180S–181S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kapoor, R.; Nair, R.K.; Nayan, N.; Bhalla, S.; Singh, J. Reinfection or Reactivation of Coronavirus-19 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Case Report Series. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2021, 3, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Krishna, V.N.; Ahmad, M.; Overton, E.T.; Jain, G. Recurrent COVID-19 in Hemodialysis: A Case Report of 2 Possible Reinfections. Kidney Med. 2021, 3, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kulkarni, O.; Narreddy, S.; Zaveri, L.; Kalal, I.G.; Tallapaka, K.B.; Sowpati, D.T. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection without mutations in Spike protein. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e1239–e1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Larson, D.; Brodniak, S.L.; Voegtly, L.J.; Cer, R.Z.; Glang, L.A.; Malagon, F.J.; Long, K.A.; Potocki, R.; Smith, D.R.; Lanteri, C.; et al. A Case of Early Re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lechien, J.R.; Chiesa-Estomba, C.M.; Vaira, L.A.; Saussez, S.; Hans, S. COVID-19 Reinfection and Second Episodes of Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunctions: Report of First Cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020, 145561320970105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lee, J.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, T.S.; Hong, K.H.; Ryoo, N.H.; Lee, J.; Park, J.H.; Cho, S.I.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, Y.G.; et al. Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Leung, S.; Hossain, N. Recurrence and Recovery of COVID-19 in an Older Adult Patient with Multiple Comorbidities: A Case Report. Gerontology 2021, 67, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Luciani, M.; Bentivegna, E.; Spuntarelli, V.; Lamberti, P.A.; Cacioli, G.; Del Porto, F.; Sesti, G.; Martelletti, P.; De Biase, L. Recurrent COVID-19 pneumonia in the course of chemotherapy: Consequence of a weakened immune system? J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1882–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mahajan, N.N.; Gajbhiye, R.K.; Lokhande, P.D.; Bahirat, S.; Modi, D.; Mathe, A.M.; Bharmal, R.; Rathi, S.; Mohite, S.C.; Tilve, A. Clinical Presentation of Cases with SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection/ Reactivation. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2021, 69, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Marquez, L.; Koy, T.; Spinler, J.K.; Luna, R.A.; Tocco, L.; Fasciano, L.; Dunn, J.; Campbell, J.R. Reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.7 variant in an immunocompromised adolescent. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol 2021, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Massanella, M.; Martin-Urda, A.; Mateu, L.; Marin, T.; Aldas, I.; Riveira-Munoz, E.; Kipelainen, A.; Jimenez-Moyano, E.; Rodriguez de la Concepcion, M.L.; Avila-Nieto, C.; et al. Critical Presentation of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection: A Case Report. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Mohseni, M.; Albus, M.; Kaminski, A.; Harrison, M.F. A Case of COVID-19 Re-Infection in a Liver Transplant Patient. Cureus 2021, 13, e14916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mulder, M.; van der Vegt, D.; Oude Munnink, B.B.; GeurtsvanKessel, C.H.; van de Bovenkamp, J.; Sikkema, R.S.; Jacobs, E.M.G.; Koopmans, M.P.G.; Wegdam-Blans, M.C.A. Reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in an immunocompromised patient: A case report. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Munoz Mendoza, J.; Alcaide, M.L. COVID-19 in a patient with end-stage renal disease on chronic in-center hemodialysis after evidence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Reinfection or inaccuracy of antibody testing. IDCases 2020, 22, e00943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nachmias, V.; Fusman, R.; Mann, S.; Koren, G. The first case of documented Covid-19 reinfection in Israel. IDCases 2020, 22, e00970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Naveca, F.; da Costa, C.; Nascimento, V.; Souza, V.; Corado, A.; Nascimento, F.; Costa, A.; Duarte, D.; Silva, G.; Mejía, M.; et al. Three SARS-CoV-2 reinfection cases by the new Variant of Concern (VOC) P.1/501Y.V3. Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nazir, N.; Ahirwar, A.; Jain, S. Reinfection in a healthcare worker with COVID-19 in a hospital in North India. Anaesth. Pain Intensive Care 2020, 24, 572–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nicholson, E.G.; Avadhanula, V.; Fragoso, S.; Stroh, R.; Ye, X.; Bond, N.; Santarcangelo, P.; Stroh, J.; Piedra, P.A. SARS-CoV-2 re-infection versus prolonged shedding: A case series. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nonaka, C.K.V.; Franco, M.M.; Graf, T.; de Lorenzo Barcia, C.A.; de Avila Mendonca, R.N.; de Sousa, K.A.F.; Neiva, L.M.C.; Fosenca, V.; Mendes, A.V.A.; de Aguiar, R.S.; et al. Genomic Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Involving E484K Spike Mutation, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1522–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Novoa, W.; Miller, H.; Mattar, S.; Faccini-Martinez, A.A.; Rivero, R.; Serrano-Coll, H. A first probable case of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Colombia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2021, 20, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ozaras, R.; Ozdogru, I.; Yilmaz, A.A. Coronavirus disease 2019 re-infection: First report from Turkey. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 38, 100774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Pow, T.; Allen, S.; Brailovsky, Y.; Darki, A. Acute submassive pulmonary embolism after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case report of reinfection or prolonged hypercoagulable state. Eur. Heart J. Case Rep. 2021, 5, ytab103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Quiroga, B.; Fernandez Ramos, A.; Delgado Arroyo, A. COVID-19 reinfection in a kidney transplant recipient, time for rethinking? Nefrologia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ramirez, J.D.; Munoz, M.; Ballesteros, N.; Patino, L.H.; Castaneda, S.; Rincon, C.A.; Mendez, C.; Oliveros, C.; Perez, J.; Marquez, E.K.; et al. Phylogenomic Evidence of Reinfection and Persistence of SARS-CoV-2: First Report from Colombia. Vaccines 2021, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Rani, P.R.; Imran, M.; Lakshmi, J.V.; Jolly, B.; Jain, A.; Surekha, A.; Senthivel, V.; Chandrasekhar, P.; Divakar, M.K.; Srinivasulu, D.; et al. Symptomatic reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with spike protein variant N440K associated with immune escape. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4163–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Resende, P.C.; Bezerra, J.F.; Teixeira Vasconcelos, R.H.; Arantes, I.; Appolinario, L.; Mendonca, A.C.; Paixao, A.C.; Duarte, A.C.; Silva, T.; Rocha, A.S.; et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 P.2 Lineage Associated with Reinfection Case, Brazil, June-October 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1789–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rodriguez-Espinosa, D.; Broseta Monzo, J.J.; Casals, Q.; Pineiro, G.J.; Rodas, L.; Vera, M.; Maduell, F. Fatal SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in an immunosuppressed patient on hemodialysis. J. Nephrol. 2021, 34, 1041–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Romano, C.M.; Felix, A.C.; Paula, A.V.; Jesus, J.G.; Andrade, P.S.; Candido, D.; Oliveira, F.M.; Ribeiro, A.C.; Silva, F.C.D.; Inemami, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection caused by the P.1 lineage in Araraquara city, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2021, 63, e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Salcin, S.; Fontem, F. Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome and development of pulmonary hypertension: A case report. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 33, 101314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Salehi-Vaziri, M.; Omrani, M.D.; Pouriayevali, M.H.; Fotouhi, F.; Banifazl, M.; Farahmand, B.; Sadat Larijani, M.; Ahmadi, Z.; Fereydouni, Z.; Tavakoli, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 presented moderately during two episodes of the infection with lack of antibody responses. Virus Res. 2021, 299, 198421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Salehi-Vaziri, M.; Jalali, T.; Farahmand, B.; Fotouhi, F.; Banifazl, M.; Pouriayevali, M.H.; Sadat Larijani, M.; Afzali, N.; Ramezani, A. Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 by re-infection vs. reactivation: A case series from Iran. Eur J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Salzer, H.J.F. Emerging COVID-19 reinfection four months after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sanyang, B.; Kanteh, A.; Usuf, E.; Nadjm, B.; Jarju, S.; Bah, A.; Bojang, A.; Grey-Johnson, M.; Jones, J.C.; Gai, A.; et al. COVID-19 reinfections in The Gambia by phylogenetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants-first two confirmed events in west Africa. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e905–e907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Scarpati, G.; Piazza, O.; Pagliano, P.; Rizzo, F. COVID-19: A confirmed case of reinfection in a nurse. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e244507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Selhorst, P.; Van Ierssel, S.; Michiels, J.; Marien, J.; Bartholomeeusen, K.; Dirinck, E.; Vandamme, S.; Jansens, H.; Arien, K.K. Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of a health care worker in a Belgian nosocomial outbreak despite primary neutralizing antibody response. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Selvaraj, V.; Herman, K.; Dapaah-Afriyie, K. Severe, Symptomatic Reinfection in a Patient with COVID-19. R I Med. J. 2020, 103, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  126. Sen, M.K.; Gupta, N.; Yadav, S.R.; Kumar, R.; Singh, B.; Ish, P. Contentious Issue in Recurrent COVID-19 Infection: Reactivation or Reinfection. Turk. Thorac. J. 2020, 21, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sevillano, G.; Ortega-Paredes, D.; Loaiza, K.; Zurita-Salinas, C.; Zurita, J. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection within the same clade in Ecuador: A case study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shastri, J.; Parikh, S.; Agrawal, S.; Chatterjee, N.; Pathak, M.; Chaudhary, S.; Sharma, C.; Kanakan, A.; Vivekanand, A.; Srinivasa Vasudevan, J.; et al. Clinical, Serological, Whole Genome Sequence Analyses to Confirm SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Patients From Mumbai, India. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2021, 8, 631769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shoar, S.; Khavandi, S.; Tabibzadeh, E.; Khavandi, S.; Naderan, M.; Shoar, N. Recurrent coronavirus diseases 19 (COVID-19): A different presentation from the first episode. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, 2149–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sicsic, I., Jr.; Chacon, A.R.; Zaw, M.; Ascher, K.; Abreu, A.; Chediak, A. A case of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a patient with obstructive sleep apnea managed with telemedicine. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e240496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Siqueira, J.D.; Goes, L.R.; Alves, B.M.; da Silva, A.C.P.; de Carvalho, P.S.; Cicala, C.; Arthos, J.; Viola, J.P.B.; Soares, M.A. Distinguishing SARS-CoV-2 bonafide re-infection from pre-existing minor variant reactivation. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 90, 104772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Silva, M.S.D.; Demoliner, M.; Hansen, A.W.; Gularte, J.S.; Silveira, F.; Heldt, F.H.; Filippi, M.; Pereira, V.; Silva, F.P.D.; Mallmann, L.; et al. Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant in Southern Brazil and reinfection of the same patient by P.2. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2021, 63, e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Staub, T.; Arendt, V.; Lasso de la Vega, E.C.; Braquet, P.; Michaux, C.; Kohnen, M.; Tsobo, C.; Abdelrahman, T.; Wienecke-Baldacchino, A.; Francois, J.H. Case series of four re-infections with a SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 variant, Luxembourg, February 2021. Euro Surveill 2021, 26, 2100423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Takeda, C.F.V.; de Almeida, M.M.; Gomes, R.G.D.; Souza, T.C.; Mota, M.A.D.; Cavalcanti, L.P.D.; Colares, J.K.B. Case Report: Recurrent Clinical Symptoms of COVID-19 in Healthcare Professionals: A Series of Cases from Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 1993–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tang, C.Y.; Wang, Y.; McElroy, J.A.; Li, T.; Hammer, R.; Ritter, D.; Lidl, G.M.; Webby, R.; Hang, J.; Wan, X.F. Reinfection with two genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 viruses within 19 days. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 5700–5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Tuan, J.; Spichler-Moffarah, A.; Ogbuagu, O. A new positive SARS-CoV-2 test months after severe COVID-19 illness: Reinfection or intermittent viral shedding? BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e240531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Teka, I.A.; BenHasan, M.H.; Alkershini, A.A.; Alatresh, O.K.; Abulifa, T.A.; Lembagga, H.A.; Alhudiri, I.M.; Elzagheid, A. Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: A case report from Libya. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 41, 102040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. To, K.K.; Hung, I.F.; Chan, K.H.; Yuan, S.; To, W.K.; Tsang, D.N.; Cheng, V.C.; Chen, Z.; Kok, K.H.; Yuen, K.Y. Serum Antibody Profile of a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Reinfection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, e659–e662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Chan, P.K.S.; Lui, G.; Hachim, A.; Ko, R.L.W.; Boon, S.S.; Li, T.; Kavian, N.; Luk, F.; Chen, Z.; Yau, E.M.; et al. Serologic Responses in Healthy Adult with SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection, Hong Kong, August 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 3076–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Tomkins-Tinch, C.H.; Daly, J.S.; Gladden-Young, A.; Theodoropoulos, N.M.; Madaio, M.P.; Yu, N.; Vanguri, V.K.; Siddle, K.J.; Adams, G.; Krasilnikova, L.A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in a Liver Transplant Recipient. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 1178–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tomassini, S.; Kotecha, D.; Bird, P.W.; Folwell, A.; Biju, S.; Tang, J.W. Setting the criteria for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection—Six possible cases. J. Infect. 2021, 82, 282–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Torres, D.A.; Ribeiro, L.; Riello, A.; Horovitz, D.D.G.; Pinto, L.F.R.; Croda, J. Reinfection of COVID-19 after 3 months with a distinct and more aggressive clinical presentation: Case report. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 93, 1857–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ul-Haq, Z.; Khan, A.; Fazid, S.; Noor, F.; Yousafzai, Y.M.; Sherin, A. First documented reinfection of SARS-COV-2 in second wave from Pakistan. J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad 2020, 32 (Suppl. 1), S704–S705. [Google Scholar]
  144. Vetter, P.; Cordey, S.; Schibler, M.; Vieux, L.; Despres, L.; Laubscher, F.; Andrey, D.O.; Martischang, R.; Harbarth, S.; Cuvelier, C.; et al. Clinical, virological and immunological features of a mild case of SARS-CoV-2 re-infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 791.e1–791.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Vora, T.; Vora, P.; Vora, F.; Sharma, K.; Desai, H.D. Symptomatic reinfection with COVID-19: A first from Western India. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2021, 10, 1496–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. West, J.; Everden, S.; Nikitas, N. A case of COVID-19 reinfection in the UK. Clin. Med. (Lond) 2021, 21, e52–e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yeleti, R.; Guglin, M.; Saleem, K.; Adigopula, S.V.; Sinha, A.; Upadhyay, S.; Everett, J.E.; Ballut, K.; Uppuluri, S.; Rao, R.A. Fulminant myocarditis: COVID or not COVID? Reinfection or co-infection? Future Cardiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Yu, A.L.F.; Liphaus, B.L.; Ferreira, P.M.; Tanamachi, A.T.; Masuda, E.T.; Trevisan, C.M.; Lucas, P.C.C.; Bugno, A.; Carvalhanas, T. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection: Report of two cases in Southeast Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2021, 63, e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zare, F.; Teimouri, M.; Khosravi, A.; Rohani-Rasaf, M.; Chaman, R.; Hosseinzadeh, A.; Jamali Atergeleh, H.; Binesh, E.; Emamian, M.H. COVID-19 re-infection in Shahroud, Iran: A follow-up study. Epidemiol. Infect. 2021, 149, e159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zhang, K.; Yiu-Nam Lau, J.; Yang, L.; Ma, Z. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in two patients who have recovered from COVID-19. Precis. Clin. Med. 2020, 3, 292–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zucman, N.; Uhel, F.; Descamps, D.; Roux, D.; Ricard, J.D. Severe reinfection with South African SARS-CoV-2 variant 501Y.V2: A case report. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tirado, S.M.; Yoon, K.J. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease. Viral Immunol. 2003, 16, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yahav, D.; Yelin, D.; Eckerle, I.; Eberhardt, C.S.; Wang, J.; Cao, B.; Kaiser, L. Definitions for coronavirus disease 2019 reinfection, relapse and PCR re-positivity. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Xiao, A.T.; Tong, Y.X.; Zhang, S. False negative of RT-PCR and prolonged nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: Rather than recurrence. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 1755–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Wang, W.; Xu, Y.; Gao, R.; Lu, R.; Han, K.; Wu, G.; Tan, W. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. JAMA 2020, 323, 1843–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Chaturvedi, R.; Naidu, R.; Sheth, S.; Chakravarthy, K. Efficacy of Serology Testing in Predicting Reinfection in Patients With SARS-CoV-2. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2020, 15, e29–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Atkinson, B.; Petersen, E. SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity. Lancet 2020, 395, 1339–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Anonymous. COVID-19 reinfection: Are we ready for winter? EBioMedicine 2020, 62, 103173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Gousseff, M.; Penot, P.; Gallay, L.; Batisse, D.; Benech, N.; Bouiller, K.; Collarino, R.; Conrad, A.; Slama, D.; Joseph, C.; et al. Clinical recurrences of COVID-19 symptoms after recovery: Viral relapse, reinfection or inflammatory rebound? J. Infect. 2020, 81, 816–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Turner, J.S.; Day, A.; Alsoussi, W.B.; Liu, Z.; O’Halloran, J.A.; Presti, R.M.; Patterson, B.K.; Whelan, S.P.J.; Ellebedy, A.H.; Mudd, P.A. SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA Shedding for More Than 87 Days in an Individual With an Impaired CD8+ T Cell Response. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 618402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Raveendran, A.V. COVID-19 re-infection: Diagnostic challenges and proposed diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2021, 15, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Pilz, S.; Chakeri, A.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Richter, L.; Theiler-Schwetz, V.; Trummer, C.; Krause, R.; Allerberger, F. SARS-CoV-2 re-infection risk in Austria. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Sui, J.; Li, W.; Roberts, A.; Matthews, L.J.; Murakami, A.; Vogel, L.; Wong, S.K.; Subbarao, K.; Farzan, M.; Marasco, W.A. Evaluation of human monoclonal antibody 80R for immunoprophylaxis of severe acute respiratory syndrome by an animal study, epitope mapping, and analysis of spike variants. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5900–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Zhao, J.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, H.; Liu, W.; Liao, X.; Su, Y.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J.; Li, T.; Li, J.; et al. Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2027–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Del Fante, C.; Franchini, M.; Baldanti, F.; Percivalle, E.; Glingani, C.; Marano, G.; Mengoli, C.; Mortellaro, C.; Viarengo, G.; Perotti, C.; et al. A retrospective study assessing the characteristics of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors and donations. Transfusion 2020, 61, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Long, Q.X.; Liu, B.Z.; Deng, H.J.; Wu, G.C.; Deng, K.; Chen, Y.K.; Liao, P.; Qiu, J.F.; Lin, Y.; Cai, X.F.; et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cassaniti, I.; Novazzi, F.; Giardina, F.; Salinaro, F.; Sachs, M.; Perlini, S.; Bruno, R.; Mojoli, F.; Baldanti, F.; Members of the San Matteo Pavia, C.-T.F. Performance of VivaDiag COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test is inadequate for diagnosis of COVID-19 in acute patients referring to emergency room department. J. Med. Virol 2020, 92, 1724–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Bichara, C.; Amoras, E.; Vaz, G.; Bichara, C.; Amaral, I.; Vallinoto, A. Persistence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Antibody up to 8 Months Post-COVID-19. Case Rep. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sethuraman, N.; Jeremiah, S.S.; Ryo, A. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA 2020, 323, 2249–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Channappanavar, R.; Fett, C.; Zhao, J.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Perlman, S. Virus-specific memory CD8 T cells provide substantial protection from lethal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 11034–11044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Sherina, N.; Piralla, A.; Du, L.; Wan, H.; Kumagai-Braesh, M.; Andréll, J.; Braesch-Andersen, S.; Cassaniti, I.; Percivalle, E.; Sarasini, A.; et al. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 specific B- and T-cell responses in convalescent COVID-19 patients 6-8 months after the infection. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Enjuanes, L.; Zuniga, S.; Castano-Rodriguez, C.; Gutierrez-Alvarez, J.; Canton, J.; Sola, I. Molecular Basis of Coronavirus Virulence and Vaccine Development. Adv. Virus Res. 2016, 96, 245–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Figueiredo-Campos, P.; Blankenhaus, B.; Mota, C.; Gomes, A.; Serrano, M.; Ariotti, S.; Costa, C.; Nunes-Cabaco, H.; Mendes, A.M.; Gaspar, P.; et al. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in COVID-19 patients and healthy volunteers up to 6 months post disease onset. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 2025–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Krishna, E.; Pathak, V.K.; Prasad, R.; Jose, H.; Kumar, M.M. COVID-19 reinfection: Linked Possibilities and future outlook. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 5445–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Khoshkam, Z.; Aftabi, Y.; Stenvinkel, P.; Paige Lawrence, B.; Rezaei, M.H.; Ichihara, G.; Fereidouni, S. Recovery scenario and immunity in COVID-19 disease: A new strategy to predict the potential of reinfection. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 31, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Prevost, J.; Finzi, A. The great escape? SARS-CoV-2 variants evading neutralizing responses. Cell Host Microbe 2021, 29, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Guallar, M.P.; Meirino, R.; Donat-Vargas, C.; Corral, O.; Jouve, N.; Soriano, V. Inoculum at the time of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and risk of disease severity. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 97, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Arvin, A.M.; Fink, K.; Schmid, M.A.; Cathcart, A.; Spreafico, R.; Havenar-Daughton, C.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Corti, D.; Virgin, H.W. A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 584, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Negro, F. Is antibody-dependent enhancement playing a role in COVID-19 pathogenesis? Swiss Med. Wkly. 2020, 150, w20249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Peron, J.P.S.; Nakaya, H. Susceptibility of the Elderly to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: ACE-2 Overexpression, Shedding, and Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE). Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020, 75, e1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ulrich, H.; Pillat, M.M.; Tarnok, A. Dengue Fever, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE): A Perspective. Cytom. A 2020, 97, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Wan, Y.; Shang, J.; Sun, S.; Tai, W.; Chen, J.; Geng, Q.; He, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Shi, Z.; et al. Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e02015-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Wen, J.; Cheng, Y.; Ling, R.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B.; Huang, W.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, Y. Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 100, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Yager, E.J. Antibody-dependent enhancement and COVID-19: Moving toward acquittal. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 217, 108496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bournazos, S.; Gupta, A.; Ravetch, J.V. The role of IgG Fc receptors in antibody-dependent enhancement. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Eroshenko, N.; Gill, T.; Keaveney, M.K.; Church, G.M.; Trevejo, J.M.; Rajaniemi, H. Implications of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection for SARS-CoV-2 countermeasures. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 789–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Fleming, A.B.; Raabe, V. Current studies of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 may underestimate risk of antibody-dependent enhancement. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Kumar, R.; Gupta, N.; Kodan, P.; Mittal, A.; Soneja, M.; Wig, N. Is there antibody-dependent enhancement in SARS Coronavirus 2? J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 2589–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Nechipurenko, Y.D.; Anashkina, A.A.; Matveeva, O.V. Change of Antigenic Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Virus S-Protein as a Possible Cause of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Cytokine Storm. Biophysics (Oxford) 2020, 65, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Yip, M.S.; Leung, N.H.; Cheung, C.Y.; Li, P.H.; Lee, H.H.; Daeron, M.; Peiris, J.S.; Bruzzone, R.; Jaume, M. Antibody-dependent infection of human macrophages by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Virol. J. 2014, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  191. Lee, W.S.; Wheatley, A.K.; Kent, S.J.; DeKosky, B.J. Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Kabir, K.M.A.; Tanimoto, J. Cost-efficiency analysis of voluntary vaccination against n-serovar diseases using antibody-dependent enhancement: A game approach. J. Theor. Biol. 2020, 503, 110379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kadkhoda, K. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, original antigenic sin, and antibody-dependent enhancement: Ménage à trois. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2020, 32, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Karthik, K.; Senthilkumar, T.M.A.; Udhayavel, S.; Raj, G.D. Role of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 and its mitigation strategies for the development of vaccines and immunotherapies to counter COVID-19. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 3055–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Cohen, J.I.; Burbelo, P.D. Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Vaccines. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Gudbjartsson, D.F.; Norddahl, G.L.; Melsted, P.; Gunnarsdottir, K.; Holm, H.; Eythorsson, E.; Arnthorsson, A.O.; Helgason, D.; Bjarnadottir, K.; Ingvarsson, R.F.; et al. Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Iyer, A.S.; Jones, F.K.; Nodoushani, A.; Kelly, M.; Becker, M.; Slater, D.; Mills, R.; Teng, E.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Garcia-Beltran, W.F.; et al. Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eabe0367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Weisblum, Y.; Schmidt, F.; Zhang, F.; DaSilva, J.; Poston, D.; Lorenzi, J.C.; Muecksch, F.; Rutkowska, M.; Hoffmann, H.H.; Michailidis, E.; et al. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Elife 2020, 9, e61312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Choudhary, M.C.; Crain, C.R.; Qiu, X.; Hanage, W.; Li, J.Z. SARS-CoV-2 Sequence Characteristics of COVID-19 Persistence and Reinfection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ulhaq, Z.S.; Soraya, G.V.; Indriana, K. Breakthrough COVID-19 case after full-dose administration of CoronaVac vaccine. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hacisuleyman, E.; Hale, C.; Saito, Y.; Blachere, N.E.; Bergh, M.; Conlon, E.G.; Schaefer-Babajew, D.J.; DaSilva, J.; Muecksch, F.; Gaebler, C.; et al. Vaccine Breakthrough Infections with SARS-CoV-2 Variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2212–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Dyer, O. Covid-19: Chinese vaccines may need changes to improve efficacy, admits official. BMJ 2021, 373, n969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Angel, Y.; Spitzer, A.; Henig, O.; Saiag, E.; Sprecher, E.; Padova, H.; Ben-Ami, R. Association Between Vaccination With BNT162b2 and Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Health Care Workers. JAMA 2021, 325, 2457–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Osterholm, M.T.; Kelley, N.S.; Sommer, A.; Belongia, E.A. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Roy, S. COVID-19 Reinfection: Myth or Truth? SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2020, 2, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Cavanaugh, A.M.; Spicer, K.B.; Thoroughman, D.; Glick, C.; Winter, K. Reduced Risk of Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 After COVID-19 Vaccination—Kentucky, May-June 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Al-Tawfiq, J.A.; Rabaan, A.A.; Al-Omari, A.; Al Mutair, A.; Al-Qahtani, M.; Tirupathi, R. Learning from SARS and MERS: COVID-19 reinfection where do we stand? Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 41, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Bizzoca, M.E.; Campisi, G.; Lo Muzio, L. An innovative risk-scoring system of dental procedures and safety protocols in the COVID-19 era. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Bizzoca, M.E.; Campisi, G.; Lo Muzio, L. Covid-19 Pandemic: What Changes for Dentists and Oral Medicine Experts? A Narrative Review and Novel Approaches to Infection Containment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Campisi, G.; Bazzano, M.; Mauceri, R.; Panzarella, V.; Di Fede, O.; Bizzoca, M.E.; Lo Muzio, L. The patient-doctor relationship: New insights in light of the current Ministerial recommendations regarding Phase 2 of the COVID-19 pandemic. Minerva Stomatol. 2020, 69, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram for the selection process of identified articles.
Figure 1. Flow diagram for the selection process of identified articles.
Ijerph 18 11001 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of cases worldwide.
Figure 2. Distribution of cases worldwide.
Ijerph 18 11001 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of cases according age.
Figure 3. Distribution of cases according age.
Ijerph 18 11001 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of cases according sex.
Figure 4. Distribution of cases according sex.
Ijerph 18 11001 g004
Figure 5. In total, 60% of reinfection involved patients in risk groups.
Figure 5. In total, 60% of reinfection involved patients in risk groups.
Ijerph 18 11001 g005
Figure 6. The evolution of the reinfection episode was more severe in 35.3% of cases.
Figure 6. The evolution of the reinfection episode was more severe in 35.3% of cases.
Ijerph 18 11001 g006
Figure 7. Flow diagram in order to determine the cause of persistent RT-PCR positivity for SARS-CoV-2, modified by Raveendran, A.V. et al. [161].
Figure 7. Flow diagram in order to determine the cause of persistent RT-PCR positivity for SARS-CoV-2, modified by Raveendran, A.V. et al. [161].
Ijerph 18 11001 g007
Table 1. Protocol of Center for Disease Control and Prevention for investigating suspected SARS-CoV-2 reinfection.
Table 1. Protocol of Center for Disease Control and Prevention for investigating suspected SARS-CoV-2 reinfection.
Investigative CriteriaLaboratory Evidence
  • People with detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA (if detected by RT-PCR, only include if Ct value < 33 or if Ct value unavailable) ≥90 days after the first detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, whether or not symptoms were present
Best evidence
Differing clades as defined in Nextstrain and GISAID of SARS-CoV-2 between the first and second infection, ideally coupled with other evidence of actual infection (e.g., high viral titers in each sample or positive for subgenomic mRNA, and culture)
2.
People with detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (if detected by RT-PCR, only include if Ct value < 33 or if Ct value unavailable) ≥45 days after the first detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
AND
with a symptomatic second episode and no obvious alternate etiology for COVID-19-like symptoms or close contact with a person known to have laboratory-confirmed COVID-19
Moderate evidence
>2 nucleotide differences per month * in consensus between sequences that meet quality metrics above, ideally coupled with other evidence of actual infection (e.g., high viral titers in each sample or positive for subgenomic mRNA, and culture)
Poor evidence but possible
≤2 nucleotide differences per month * in consensus between sequences that meet quality metrics above or >2 nucleotide differences per month * in consensus between sequences that do not meet quality metrics above, ideally coupled with other evidence of actual infection (e.g., high viral titers in each sample or positive for subgenomic mRNA, and culture)
* The mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 is estimated at 2 nucleotide differences per month, therefore if suspected reinfection occurs 90 days after initial infection, moderate evidence would require >6 nucleotide differences.
Table 2. Cases of SARS-CoV2 reinfection in the international literature (all cases were again positive for SARS-CoV-2 after complete symptomatic recovery in addition to negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, according to WHO recommendations [34]).
Table 2. Cases of SARS-CoV2 reinfection in the international literature (all cases were again positive for SARS-CoV-2 after complete symptomatic recovery in addition to negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, according to WHO recommendations [34]).
AuthorsYearPatient CountryPatientInterval Time between 1 Infection and ReinfectionViral Genome SequenceCOVID-19SymptomsAntibody after First Infection or Reinfection
  • Abu-Raddad LJ et al. [35]—case 27
2021Qatar25–29-year-old man469 SNVs compared to initial infection strain, including D614GMildN/AN/A
MildN/A
2.
Abu-Raddad LJ et al. [35]—case 33
2021Qatar40–44-year-old man7111 SNVs compared to initial infection strain, including D614GMildN/AN/A
MildN/A
3.
Abu-Raddad LJ et al. [35]—case 20
2021Qatar45–49-year-old woman883 SNVs compared to initial infection strain, including D614GMildN/AROCHE elecsys antiSARS-CoV-2 negative at time of reinfection
MildN/A
4.
Abu-Raddad LJ et al. [35]—case 44
2021Qatar25–29-year-old woman551 SNVs compared to initial infection strain, including D614GMildN/AN/A
MildN/A
5.
Adrielle dos Santos L et al. [36]
2021Brazil44-year-old healthcare man with systemic arterial hypertension, obesity5320AMildDry cough, dyspnea, dysgeusia, diarrhea, asthenia, sneezing/runny noseN/A
Clade B.1.1.28WorseDry cough, dyspnea, fever, myalgia, asthenia, arthralgia, headache, nausea/vomiting, sneezing/runny nose, severe respiratory symptoms and was admitted to ICU, dying after 20 days of symptoms
6.
Aguilar-Shea AL et al. [37]
2021Spain39-year-old healthcare man290N/AMildSore throat, fever, general malaise, nasal congestion, tachycardia, chest pain, loss of smell and tasteRapid antibody test: positive
201/501Y.V1.Britain variant B.1.17MilderSore throat, slight general malaise, nasal congestion, tirednessRapid antibody test: positive
7.
Ahmadian S et al. [38]
2021Iran36-year-old healthcare man60N/AMildLethargy, fatigue, shortness of breath, headache, fever, chillsN/A
MilderEye infection, fever, fatigue, shortness of breath, muscle pain
8.
Ahmed A et al. [39]
2021PakistanHealthcare worker man118N/AMildArthralgia, weakness, anosmia, ageusiaN/A
MilderFever, sore throat, dry cough
9.
Ahmed A et al. [39]
2021PakistanHealthcare worker man86N/AMildFever, sore throatN/A
MilderSinusitis
10.
Ak R et al. [40]
2021Pakistan40-year-old male94N/AMildFeverN/A
WorseSore throat, cough, diarrhea
11.
Aldossary B et al. [41]
2021Bahrain47-year-old woman without comorbidities60N/AMildMild respiratory tract symptomsN/A
WorseAbdominal pain, fulminant hepatic failure > death
12.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 1
2020Iran20s year age range, male89 **N/AMildFever, myalgia6.7 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, myalgia, cough, loss of taste, loss of smell
13.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 2
2020Iran30s year age range, female55 **N/AMildFever, myalgia10.3 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
14.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 5
2020Iran40s year age range, male55 **N/AMildFever, myalgia15.5 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
MildFever, myalgia, cough
15.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 8
2020Iran50s year age range, male46 **N/AMildFever, myalgia10.3 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
16.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 9
2020Iran50s year age range, female53 **N/AMildFever, loss of taste and smell5.35 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
MilderFever, myalgia, cough
17.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 11
2020Iran40s year age range, male76 **N/AMildFever, myalgia7.22 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
18.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 12
2020Iran40s year age range, female45 **N/AMildFever, myalgia11.2 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
19.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 14
2020Iran40s year age range, male50 **N/AMildFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia12.51 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
MildFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
20.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 16
2020Iran40s year age range, male62 **N/AMildFever, cough7.11 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
21.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 17
2020Iran40s year age range, female49 **N/AMildFever8.37 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia
22.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 18
2020Iran40s year age range, male72 **N/AMildFever5.11 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
23.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 20
2020Iran30s year age range, male59 **N/AMildFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia6.3 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
MildFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
24.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 22
2020Iran50s year age range, male53 **N/AMildFever, myalgia9.3 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
25.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 23
2020Iran20s year age range, male49 **N/AMildFever, myalgia7.25 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough
26.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 24
2020Iran40s year age range, female52 **N/AMildFever, myalgia6.21 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
WorseLoss of taste and smell, myalgia
27.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 25
2020Iran20s year age range, female54 **N/AMildFever11.9 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
MildFever, cough
28.
Ali A. et al. [42]
Patient 26
2020Iran30s year age range, male138 **N/AModerateFever, loss of taste and smell, myalgia, cough2.08 IgG (s/ca) after recovery
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
29.
AlFehaidi A et al. [43]
2020Qatar46-year-old woman with mild asthma80N/AMildSore throatN/A
ModerateChest pain, fever, sore throat, body pain, cough, mild dyspnea
30.
Alshukairi AN et al. [44]
2021Saudi Arabia51-year-old woman with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma16019BMildFever, cough, malaise, and headacheNegative COVID-19 serology after 1st infection and reinfection
20BMildFever and dyspnea
31.
Amikishiyes S et al. [16]
2021Turkey34-year-old man with chronic glomerulonephritis>150N/AMildAsymptomaticN/A
WorseCough, fever, bilateral infiltrates at computed chest tomography
32.
Amorin MR et al. [45]
2021Brazil35-year-old healthcare worker woman55N/AMildFever, headache, chills, sneezing, coryza, myalgiaN/A
MildHeadache, nasal congestion, odynophagia, ageusia, anosmia
33.
Amorin MR et al. [45]
2021Brazil61-year-old healthcare worker woman with chronic bronchitis170N/AMildHeadache, cough, myalgia, odynophagia, coryza, diarrhea, ageusiaN/A
MildCough, myalgia, odynophagia, anosmia, diarrhea
34.
Amorin MR et al. [45]
2021Brazil40-year-old healthcare worker woman131N/AMildNasal congestion, coryza, cough, ageusiaN/A
MildOdynophagia, sneezing, coryza, diarrhea, ageusia, anosmia
35.
Amorin MR et al. [45]
2021Brazil40-year-old healthcare worker woman148N/AMildFever, headache, myalgia, coryza, dry cough, vomiting, malaiseN/A
MildOdynophagia, dry cough, myalgia, malaise, coryza, headache
36.
Arteaga-Livias K et al. [46].
2021Peru42-year-old healthcare worker woman107N/AMild with home managementOdynophagia, headache, malaise, rhinorrhea, ageusia, anosmia, coughIgM and IgG+
Worse with home managementChest pain, productive cough, anosmia, pneumonia
37.
Atici S et al. [47]
2021Turkey46-year-old healthcare worker man114N/AModerateFever, sore throat, headache, cough, weakness, nausea and diarrhea, bilateral ground glass opacities and peribronchial thickening predominating on the right
lung
N/A
MildSore throat, fever, headache, myalgia, weakness and nausea
38.
Atici S et al. [47]
2021Turkey47-year-old healthcare worker woman128N/AMildMyalgia, headache and abdominal pain started without fever and coughN/A
WorseSore throat, headache and myalgia, fever, cough and mild respiratory symptoms, ground glass opacities and subpleural nodule on the left lung base consistent with COVID-19 on chest CT imagine
39.
Awada H et al. [48]
2021Lebanon27-year-old man56N/AMildFever, chills, diffuse arthralgia, myalgia, headache, back painN/A
MilderFever, headache
40.
Bader N et al. [49]
2021USA73-year-old man with obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pancreatic insufficiency, type II diabetes mellitus60N/AMildShortness of breathN/A
WorseDyspnea, fevers, confusion with worsening clinical situation and intubation
41.
Baiswar S et al. [50]
2021USA28-year-old male with diabetes mellitus type 1, hypertension, and end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis with multiple past admissions for diabetic ketoacidosis and uncontrolled hypertension122N/AMildNausea and vomitingN/A
WorseHeadaches and altered mental status, left-hand weakness. The patient became unresponsive and was intubated for airway protection > cerebrovascular accident
42.
Bellesso M et al. [51]
2021Brazil76-year-old female with end-stage kidney disease related to lambda light chain multiple myeloma126N/AModerateHip pain, confusion, respiratory distressN/A
WorseDyspnea, acute respiratory failure, hypoxemia > death
43.
Bongiovanni M. [52]
2020Italy48-year-old nurse female90N/AMildDry cough, mild feverLIASON ® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG+ 30 Au/mL
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticIgG+ 102.9 Au/mL
44.
Bonifacio LP et al. [53]
2020Brazil24-year-old white female without comorbidities76N/AMild with complete resolution at home within 10 daysHeadache, malaise, adynamia, feverish sensation, sore throat, nasal congestionN/A
Worse with home resolution in 12 days, headache and hyposmia for 63 daysMalaise, myalgia, severe headache, fatigue, weakness, feverish sensation, sore throat, anosmia, dysgeusia, diarrhea, coughingIgG/IgM– at NAAT+IgG/IgM+ 28 days after NAAT+
45.
Borgogna C et al. [54]
2021Italy52-year-old man with transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis110Clade 20B and Pangolin lineage B.1.1MildCough, fever
Clade 20A and Pangolin lineage B.1MilderFeverVery low levels of IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, positive IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 N protein
46.
Brehm TT et al. [55]
2021Germany27-year-old female nurse282HH-24.I
(19A)
MildFever, chills, dyspneaIgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein: 40 AU/mL in July 2020, 15 AU/mL in September 2020
HH-24.II (20EU1) with differences in 21 positions, including 2 typical variations in spike proteins A222V and D614GMilderDry cough, mild rhinorrheaIgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein: 97 AU/mL on 29 December
47.
Buddingh EP et al. [56]
2021The Netherlands16-year-old girl390ClassicModerateHigh fever, mild conjunctivitis, malaise, chest pain, coughing, abdominal pain and diarrhea. She was diagnosed with myocarditis, shock and had high inflammatory parameters.IgG SARS-CoV-2 was negative (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG; Abbott Laboratories)
B.1.1.7 variant (UK variant),MildMild respiratory symptoms
48.
Caralis P. [57]
2021USA60 with diabetes72N/AMildAcute renal failure
MilderFatigue
49.
Caralis P. [57]
2021USA27 with psoriatic arthritis79N/AMildFever, flu-likeIgG+
MilderFatigue, loss taste
50.
Caralis P. [57]
2021USA33 year-old woman with allergic rhinitis172N/AMildFever, cough, diarrheaIgG+
MilderFever headache
51.
Caralis P. [57]
2021USA71 with renal/liver transplant HIV, diabetes93N/AModerateFever, pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
52.
Caralis P. [57]
2021USA72 with pulmonary/cardiac sarcoidosis111N/AMildDyspnea, fatigue, headache
MilderFatigue
53.
Cavanagaugh AM et al. [58]
2021USAM (80–89 years old)101N/AAsymptomaticasymptomaticN/A
MildLethargy, decreased appetite, dry cough for 14 days
54.
Cavanagaugh AM et al. [58]
2021USAF (80–89 years old)103N/AAsymptomaticasymptomaticN/A
WorseCongestion, respiratory failure and death
55.
Cavanagaugh AM et al. [58]
2021USAF (60–69 years old)109N/AMildnauseaN/A
MildCough, sore throat, loss of appetite, malaise, muscle aches for 17 days
56.
Cavanagaugh AM et al. [58]
2021USAF (70–79 years old)109N/AMildGastrointestinal symptoms for 17 daysN/A
MilderLoss of appetite, malaise for 12 days
57.
Cavanagaugh AM et al. [58]
2021USAFemale (90–99 years old)110N/AAsymptomaticasymptomaticN/A
MildCough, loss of appetite, malaise, muscle aches for 6 days
58.
Colson P et al. [59]
2021France70-year-old man105Clade 20AModerateFever, coughIgG+ on D26
20A.E2, 34 nucleotide differencesAsymptomatic, during a systematic screeningAsymptomatic
59.
Das P et al. [60]—case 1
2021BangladeshA 35–49-year-old man with hypertension98N/AMildFever, cough
MilderFever, cough, cold
60.
Das P et al. [60]—case 2
2021BangladeshA 35–49-year-old researcher woman92N/AMildMalaise
MilderSore throat, fever, cough, headache
61.
Das P et al. [60]—case 3
2021Bangladesh35–49 hypertensive physician94N/AMildFever, headache, sore throat
MildFever, cold, low oxygen saturation
62.
Das P et al. [60]—case 4
2021Bangladesh35–49 man with asthma93N/AMildFever
MildFever, cough
63.
Das P et al. [60]—case 5
2021Bangladesh35–49-year-old health worker woman with hypertension, hypothyroidism131N/AMildFever, cough
WorseChest pain, headache, sore throat, hospitalized
64.
Daw MA et al. [61]
2021Libya52-year-old healthy male72N/AMildCough, sore throat, fever, myalgias, headacheN/A
WorseFever, cough, shortness of breath, gastrointestinal symptoms
65.
De Brito C. et al. [62]
2020Brazil40-year-old male doctor46N/AModerateFever, cough, sore throat, fatigue, myalgia, headache, diarrheaIgG and IgM– 42 days after 1 infection
ModerateFever, cough, sore throat, fatigue, myalgia, headache, diarrhea, anosmia and dysgeusiaIgG and IgM–
66.
Diaz Y et al. [63]
2021Panama36-year-old man without comorbidities181A.2.4MildMyalgia, chest pain, fever, cephalea, rhinorrhea, hyposmia, ageusia
A.2.5 containing Spike mutations D614G and L452RMilderCephalea, myalgia, rhinorrhea
67.
Dimeglio C et al. [64]
2021France25-year-old female healthcare worker>90N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticNo neutralizing antibodies
ModerateFever, rhinorrhea, dyspnea, chest pain, dysgeusia, anosmia, asthenia, myalgia, eye pain, pharyngitis; not hospitalizedYes, neutralizing antibodies
68.
Dimeglio C et al. [64]
2021France40-year-old female healthcare worker>90N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticNo neutralizing antibodies
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticNo neutralizing antibodies
69.
Dimeglio C et al. [64]
2021France46-year-old female healthcare worker>90N/AModerateFever, rhinorrhea, cough, dyspnea, chest pain, intestinal disorders, dysgeusia, anosmia, asthenia, headache, myalgia, not hospitalizedYes, neutralizing antibodies
MildFever, cough, dyspnea, chest pain, headache, asthenia, myalgia, pharyngitis; not hospitalizedYes, neutralizing antibodies
70.
Dimeglio C et al. [64]
2021France31-year-old male healthcare worker>90N/AMildAnosmia; not hospitalizedYes, neutralizing antibodies
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticYes, neutralizing antibodies
71.
Dimeglio C et al. [64]
2021France50-year-old female healthcare worker>90N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticYes, neutralizing antibodies
MildCough, headache; not hospitalizedYes, neutralizing antibodies
72.
Dobano C et al. [65]
2021Spain29-year-old female healthcare worker212N/AMild60 daysSeronegative after 1st infection, seroconverted after re-infection
Mild70 days
73.
Dobano C et al. [65]
2021Spain41-year-old female healthcare worker154N/AMild61 daysSeronegative after 1st infection, seroconverted after re-infection
Milder
74.
Dobano C et al. [65]
2021Spain58-year-old female healthcare worker58N/AMild3 daysUnknow after 1st infection, seropositive after reinfection
Mild3 days
75.
Dobano C et al. [65]
2021Spain44-year-old female healthcare worker211N/AMild11 daysSeropositive after 1st infection with antibody low-level
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
76.
Duggan NM et al. [66]
2020USA82-year-old male with Parkinson, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension48N/ASevere with intubationFever, shortness of breath, hypoxia, pneumoniaN/A
Severe without intubationFever, hypoxia, hypotension, tachycardia, pneumonia
77.
Elzein F et al. [67]
2021Saudi Arabia51-year-old man without comorbidities58 AsymptomaticAsymptomatic7.04 SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbot) during second admission
WorseFever, cough, generalized weakness, and shortness of breath, bilateral diffuse patchy airspace disease while a CT scan revealed bilateral patchy 4 central and peripheral ground glass opacities most likely related to COVID-19
78.
Elzein F et al. [67]
2021Saudi Arabia55-year-old man with relapsed NHL31 MildMild0.01 SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbot) index negative during second admission
WorseHigh grade fever, dry cough, sore throat, tachycardia and (SPO2) 93% on room air
79.
Elzien F et al. [67]
2021Saudi Arabia60-year-old man with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease27 MildMildN/A
MilderCough, shortness of breath
80.
Elzein F et al. [67]
2021Saudi Arabia48-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer85 ModeratePneumoniaN/A
MildFever, shortness of breath
81.
Fageeh H et al. [68]
2021Saudi Arabia24-year-old male dental student90N/AMildSore throat, cough, headache, nausea, diarrhea, loss of taste and smell, insomnia, loss of appetite, and fatigue, fear and anxiety, increased insomnia, and increased body acheN/A
MildCoughing, body ache, loss of taste and smell, and diarrhea symptoms were slightly less severe, the patient was less anxious and slept well. Fever
82.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 1
2021Czech Republic60-year-old man with diabetes177N/AMildMild—long term care facilityN/A
ModerateMild—hospitalized
83.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 2
2021Czech Republic75-year-old man with diabetes, cardiovascular disease102N/AMildMild—long term care facilityN/A
SevereMild—hospitalized
84.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 3
2021Czech Republic72-year-old man with malignity205N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
85.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 4
2021Czech Republic62-year-old woman with asthma137N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
86.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 5
2021Czech Republic57-year-old woman without comorbidities203N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
87.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 6
2021Czech Republic56-year-old woman without comorbidities216N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
88.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 7
2021Czech Republic55-year-old man without comorbidities212N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
89.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 8
2021Czech Republic53-year-old man without comorbidities214N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
90.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 9
2021Czech Republic50-year-old woman with malignity197N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
91.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 10
2021Czech Republic49-year-old woman without comorbidities195N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
92.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 11
2021Czech Republic49-year-old woman without comorbidities200N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
93.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 12
2021Czech Republic47-year-old man without comorbidities141N/AMildMild—homeN/A
ModerateMild—home
94.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 13
2021Czech Republic47-year-old man without comorbidities206N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
95.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 14
2021Czech Republic46-year-old man without comorbidities154N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
96.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 15
2021Czech Republic46-year-old woman without comorbidities231N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
97.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 16
2021Czech Republic45-year-old woman without comorbidities101N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
98.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 17
2021Czech Republic45-year-old woman with diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, allergy196N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
99.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 18
2021Czech Republic45-year-old woman with cardiovascular disease211N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
100.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 19
2021Czech Republic44-year-old woman with hypertension169N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
101.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 20
2021Czech Republic44-year-old man without comorbidities224N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
102.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 21
2021Czech Republic42-year-old woman without comorbidities206N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
103.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 22
2021Czech Republic39-year-old woman without comorbidities229N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
104.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 23
2021Czech Republic34-year-old man without comorbidities158N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
105.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 24
2021Czech Republic30-year-old woman without comorbidities219N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
106.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 25
2021Czech Republic29-year-old woman without comorbidities139N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
107.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 26
2021Czech Republic27-year-old woman without comorbidities172N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
108.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 27
2021Czech Republic27-year-old woman without comorbidities215N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
109.
Fabianova K et al. [69]—case 28
2021Czech Republic25-year-old man without comorbidities222N/AMildMild—homeN/A
MildMild—home
110.
Fernandez AC et al. [70]
2021Portugal28-year-old man with asthma285N/AMildFever, chills, sneezingN/A
WorseFever, tiredness, productive cough, frontal headache, dizziness, dark urine, dysuria
111.
Ferrante L et al. [71]
2021Brazil24-year-old woman without comorbidities109N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticNo IgG antibodies after first infection
P1 variantWorseHeadache, sore throat, odynophagia, nasal congestion, tiredness, fatigue, chest pain, lack of appetite, hypertension, tachycardia
112.
Fintelman-Rodrigues N et al. [72]
2021Brazil54-year-old man without comorbidities65N/AMildHeadacheIgM, IgA, IgG detected <1:4
Clade 20BWorseFever, dry cough, tiredness, body ache, anosmia, ageusiaIgM, IgA, IgG detected 1:128
113.
Fintelman-Rodrigues N et al. [72]
2021Brazil57-year-old woman with discoid lupus erythematous61Clade 19AMildMild diarrheaIgM, IgA, IgG detected <1:4
Clade 20BWorseFever, diarrhea, headache, body ache, anosmia, ageusiaIgM, IgA, IgG detected 1:32
114.
Fintelman-Rodrigues N et al. [72]
2021Brazil34-year-old man without comorbidities64Clade 20BMildAsymptomaticIgM, IgA, IgG detected <1:4
Clade 20BWorseFever, nausea, tiredness, headache, body acheIgM, IgA, IgG detected 1.64
115.
Fintelman-Rodrigues N et al. [72]
2021Brazil34-year-old woman without comorbidities60N/AMildMild diarrheaIgM, IgA, IgG detected <1:4
Clade 20BWorseDry cough, diarrhea, tiredness, headache, body ache, anosmia, ageusiaIgM, IgA, IgG detected 1:64
116.
Fonseca V et al. [73]
2021Brazil29-year-old health care worker man without comorbidities225B.1.1.28
Spike D614G
MildFever, myalgia cough, sore throat, diarrheaIgG negative 180 days after the 1st infection
B,1,2
Spike D614G
MildAgain symptoms
117.
Garduno-Orbe B et al. [74]
2021Mexico40-year-old healthcare worker woman with hypertension, smoking134N/AModerateFever, dry cough, nasal drainage, dyspnea, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, anosmia, dysgeusia, decreased oxygen saturation up to 84%, maculopapular rash on the upper and lower limbs, chest, face, neck
WorseSneezing, runny nose, myalgia, arthralgia, fever, dry cough, headache, dyspnea, emphysema of the right lung
118.
Garduno-Orbe B et al. [74]
2021Mexico49-year-old health care worker woman with hypothyroidism129N/AMildNasal congestion, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, headache, dry cough, dysgeusia, anosmia, maculopapular exanthema, insomnia
MildHeadache, dry cough, odynophagia, myalgia, dyspnea, conjunctivitis
119.
Garduno-Orbe B et al. [74]
2021Mexico53-year-old health care worker man without comorbidities107N/AMildFever, dyspnea, pneumonia
MildFever, chills, anosmia, dysgeusia dry cough, rhinorrhea, general malaise, chest pain,
120.
Garduno-Orbe B et al. [74]
2021Mexico52-year-old health care worker man without comorbidities82N/AMildOdynophagia, dry cough, nasopharyngeal exudate
WorseMyalgias, arthralgias, dry cough, dyspnea, odynophagia, pneumonia> intensive care for hypoxia
121.
Garg J et al. [75]
2021India30-year-old health care worker man without comorbidities90N/AMildFever30 days after initial diagnosis IgG antibody negativity
WorseFever, severe myalgia, anosmia, loss of taste30 days after reinfection diagnosis IgG antibody positivity
122.
Garvey MI et al. [76]
2021UK92-year-old man with dementia2071st waveModeratePyrexia, dry cough, shortness of breath, bilateral pneumonia
B.1.177 (Spain variant)ModerateLethargy, persistent cough, pyrexia, pneumonia
123.
Garvey MI et al. [76]
2021UK84-year-old man with dementia and Paget’s disease2241st waveMildLethargy, confusion, headache, fatigue
B.1.177 (Spain variant)MildPositive
124.
Garvey MI et al. [76]
2021UK59-year-old man with end stage renal failure2361st waveMildCough, fluctuating temperature
B.1.1.7 (Kent variant)noneNone
125.
Goel N et al. [77]
2021USA59-year-old man with end stage renal failure and hemodialysis59N/AModerateCough, fever, pneumonia > hospitalization
MilderCough, shortness of breath, >hospitalizationSARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody positive after re-infection
126.
Goldman JD et al. [30]
2020USA (Washington)Sexagenarian (age between 60 and 69) with emphysema and hypertension140Clade 19BSevereFever, chills, productive cough, dyspnea, chest pain
Clade 20A harboring the spike variant D614GSevere, but milder than firstDyspnea, dry cough, weaknessRBD, spike and NC IgG, spike IgM, NC IgA+ on D14 of reinfection
127.
Gulati K et al. [78]
2021UK61-year-old south Asian with immunosuppression for ANCA-associated vasculitis180N/ASevereDry cough, dyspnea, fever, myalgia, kidney dysfunction, pneumoniaN/A
ModerateFever, myalgia, dyspnea, pneumonia
128.
Gupta V et al. [79]
2020India25-year-old male healthcare worker1089 SNVs compared to initial infection (19A first infection–20A second infection)AsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic with higher viral load
129.
Gupta V et al. [79]
2020India28-year-old female healthcare worker11110 SNVs compared to initial infection; mutation 22882T > G (S:N440K) within the receptor binding domain found in the second episodeAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic with higher viral load
130.
Habadi MI et al. [80]
2021SAU44-year-old woman healthcare worker108N/AModerateFever, chills, severe sore throat, fatigueN/A
ModerateSevere persistent productive cough, runny nose, loss of smell, partial loss of taste
131.
Habadi MI et al. [80]
2021SAU35-year-old heavy male smoker94N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
WorseFever, cough, body ache, abdominal pain, loss of taste
132.
Hanif M et al. [81]
2020Pakistan58-year-old cardiac surgeon male without comorbidities55N/AHospitalized for 30 daysFatigue, headache, sore throat, pneumoniaN/A
Hospitalized for 14 daysFever >39 °C, headache, muscle aches
133.
Harrington D et al. [82]
2021UK78-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, sleep apnea, ischemic heart disease250Lineage B.2 with no mutations in the S regionDischarged homeMild illnessSARS-CoV-2 antibodies (using the Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG assay detecting antibodies targeting viral nucleocapsid “N” antigen) were detectable on 6 occasions between 4 June 2020 and 13 November 2020 with no evidence of antibody waning seen
Variant VOC-20201/01 of lineage B.1.1.7 with 18 amino acid replacement and deletions in the S regionEmergency intubation, worseShortness breath, severe hypoxia, pneumonia, myocardial infarction
134.
Hayes B et al. [83]
2021USA30-year-old female healthcare worker with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, pancreatitis, GERD, anxiety, recurrent pneumonia183N/AMildFever, fatigue, sore throat, nasal congestion, dry cough, chest tightnessAfter 1st infection anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were negative
MildHeadaches, fever, sinus congestionAfter 2nd infection anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were positive
135.
Hunsinger HP et al. [84]
2021USA81-year-old woman with immunosuppression for rheumatoid arthritis62N/AMildAltered mental status,N/A
ModerateCough, shortness of breath, oxygen requirement
136.
Hussein NR, Musa DH et al. [85]
2021Iraq39-year-old man with hypertension112N/AModerateFever, dry cough, hypoxemiaSARS-CoV-2 2 months after discharge
MildFever, not hypoxemia
137.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 1
2021Iraq32-year-old man82N/AMildMyalgia, feverN/A
MildMyalgia
138.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 2
2021Iraq40-year-old man50N/ASevereFever, loss of smell, myalgia, dyspneaN/A
MildFever, sore throat
139.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 3
2021Iraq46-year-old man74N/AMildFever, dry coughN/A
ModerateFever, sore throat, loss of taste and smell
140.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 4
2021Iraq39-year-old man122N/ASevereFever, dry cough, dyspneaN/A
MildFever, sore throat
141.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 5
2021Iraq32-year-old woman174N/AMildFever, dry cough, loss of smell, sore throatN/A
MildFever, sore throat, myalgia
142.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 6
2021Iraq44-year-old man with colon cancer51N/AMildFever, myalgiaN/A
MildMyalgia
143.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 7
2021Iraq26-year-old woman84N/AMildHeadache, sweating, loss of tasteN/A
MildHeadache, myalgia
144.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 8
2021Iraq26-year-old woman84N/AMildHeadache, loss of tasteN/A
ModerateMyalgia, cough, dyspnea
145.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 9
2021Iraq36-year-old woman with diabetes51N/AMildSore throat, feverN/A
SevereFever, myalgia, cough, dyspnea
146.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 10
2021Iraq34-year-old man49N/AMildHeadache, feverN/A
SevereMyalgia, fever, headache, anorexia
147.
Hussein NR, Rashad BH et al. [86]—case 11
2021Iraq79-year-old woman with heart failure and hypertension58N/ASevereFever, dyspneaN/A
SevereCough, anorexia, fever
148.
Ibrahim M et al. [87]
2021USA59-year-old Caucasian male with Hodgkin lymphoma150N/AModerateShortness of breath, dry cough, tachycardia, oxygen desaturation to 85%N/A
ModerateChills, worsening shortness of breath, productive cough, fever, tachycardia, hypoxemia
149.
Inada M et al. [88]
2021Japan58-year-old with mild dyslipidemia105N/AModerateFever, bilateral pneumoniaAfter 1st episode IC50 of neutralizing antibodies anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 50.0 microg/mL
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticAfter 2nd episode IC50 of neutralizing antibodies anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 14.8 microg/mL
150.
Jain A et al. [89]
2020India21-year-old female50N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
mildComplete loss of smell for 2 weeks
151.
Kapoor R et al. [90]
2021India39-year-old male with multiple myeloma84N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
SevereHigh grade fever, chills, shortness of breath, bilateral pneunomia
152.
Kapoor R et al. [90]
2021India33-year-old male with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia60N/ASevereFever, cough, pneumoniaN/A
SevereHeadache, vomiting, high grade fever, pneumonia
153.
Kapoor R et al. [90]
2021India26-year-old male with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia91N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
ModerateFever
154.
Krishna VN et al. [91]
2021USA70-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease45N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticCOVID-19 IgG positive after 1st infection
WorseShortness of breath, cough, chest pain, myalgias
155.
Krishna VN et al. [91]
2021USALate 50s woman with hypertension, hepatitis C, heart failure75N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
WorseFever, myalgias, sore throat
156.
Klein J et al. [31] *
2021USA66-year-old man with bipolar disorder, end-stage renal disease due to lithium toxicity and renal transplantation210Clade B.1MildFever, fatigue, dry coughFailure of humoral immunity with defective response of the neutralizing antibodies after primary infection
Clade B.1.280MilderFatigue and nonproductive cough
157.
Kulkarni O et al. [92]
2021India61-year-old male healthcare worker7520B cladeAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
20B clade with 10 variationsMildCough, weakness
158.
Larson D et al. [93]
2020USA (Virginia)42-year-old man military healthcare provider64Lineage B.1.26Moderate, clinical resolution in 10 daysCough, fever, myalgias
Lineage B.1.26 with several potential variationsSevere, worseFever, cough, shortness of breath, gastrointestinal symptoms, pneumoniaSpike IgG+ on D8 of reinfection
159.
Lechien JR et al. [94]
2020France42-year-old Parisian male7 monthsN/AHome-managedDyspnea, fever, headache, diarrhea, abdominal pain, ageusia, total less of smellIgG 2 months after
MilderFever, nasal burning, total loss of taste and smell
160.
Lechien JR et al. [94]
2020Spain38-year-old Spanish health care worker female6 monthsN/AModerate—hospitalized for 7 daysDyspnea, fever, headache, diarrhea, loss of smellN/A
MilderFever, headache, new total loss of smell and taste
161.
Lee JS et al. [95]
2020South Korea21-year-old healthy woman26Clade V—found in Asia and EuropeHospitalized with few symptomsSore throat
Clade G—found in south KoreaMildCough, sore throatIgG+
162.
Loconsole D et al. [96]
2021Italy41-year-old healthcare worker woman28920BMildFever, arthralgia, headache, diarrhea, anosmia, ageusiaIgG positive after 1st infection and after 2nd infection
20E (EU1)MildHeadache, sore throat, diarrhea
163.
Loh SY et al.
2021UK55-year-old man with X-linked agammaglobulinemia56N/AModeratePurulent sputum, fever, breathlessness, fever, headache, myalgia, chest tightnessN/A
WorseShort of breath, fevers > death
164.
Luciani M et al. [97]
2020Italy69-year-old man, heavy smoker with classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma with mixed cellularity131N/AModerate with 3 months of hospitalizationPneumonia, fever, diarrheaIgG+ 50 days after hospitalization
Moderate with 64 days of hospitalizationFever, dyspnea, anemia, leukopenia, pneumoniaN/A
165.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 2
2021India33-year-old man90N/AMildSore throatN/A
WorseInfluenza like Illness symptoms with breathing difficulty
166.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 3
2021India27-year-old man69N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
WorseFever, cough, myalgia
167.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 4
2021India48-year-old woman97N/AMildMyalgiaN/A
MildMyalgia
168.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 5
2021India26-year-old woman55N/AMildFever, myalgiaN/A
MildFever, sore throat, myalgia
169.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 6
2021India25-year-old man89N/AMildFever, sore throat, myalgia and loss of smell and tasteN/A
MildFever
170.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 7
2021India31-year-old man70N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
WorseMyalgia
171.
Mahajan NN et al. [98]—Case 9
2021India51-year-old woman157N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
WorseMyalgia, headache, pneumonia (25% lung involvement)
172.
Marquez L et al. [99]
2021USA16-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease90B.1.2MildSore throat, fatigue, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, dry coughIgM+ and IgG− after the 2nd infection
B.1.1.7MilderLeg pain, fatigue, swelling leg, fever
173.
Massanella M et al. [100]
2021Spain62-year-old male healthcare worker with previous history of mild asthma, hypertension, dyslipidemia, liver steatosis, hyperuricemia, and overweight (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2)158 MildFever of 38 °C, diarrhea, anosmia, dysgeusia, cough, intense asthenia, and arthromyalgiaAfter reinfection weak immune response, with marginal humoral and specific T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2. All antibody isotypes tested as well as SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies increased sharply after day 8 post symptoms. A slight increase of T-cell responses was observed at day 19 after symptom onset
B.1.79 (G)WorseIntense arthromyalgias, headache, fever, cough, and dyspnea > admitted to the emergency room for worsening dyspnea, cough, chills, fever 39 °C, myalgias, anosmia, and ageusia. His respiratory rate was 36 breaths/minute, his heart rate was 100 beats/minute, and he had bilateral inspiratory crackles. The chest radiograph showed bilateral alveolar-interstitial infiltrates
174.
Mohseni M et al. [101]
2021USA53-year-old female with liver transplant in 2010 due to alcoholic cirrhosis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease90N/ASevereEncephalopathy due to her COVID-19N/A
MildNausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and myalgias
175.
Mulder et al. [102]
2020Denmark89-year-old immunocompromised woman (Waldestrom macroglobulinemia)59The 2 strains differed at 10 nucleotide positions in ORF1a (4), ORF1b (2), spike (2), ORF3A (1), M (1) genesHospitalized for 5 daysFever, severe cough, persisting fatigueIgM-
WorseFever, cough, dyspnea > death after 2 weeksN/A
176.
Munos Mendoza J et al. [103]
2020USA51-year-old African American male with hypertension and hemodialysis history2 monthsN/AAsymptomaticPositive for NAAT and IgG at a routine control during hemodialysisIgM−, IgG+
Severe, hospitalized with non-invasive positive pressure mechanical ventilationFever 38.3 °C, severe dyspnea, pneumoniaIgG+, IgM+, IgA+
177.
Nachmias V. et al. [104]
2020Israel22-year-old woman without comorbidities111N/AMild with home back after 23 daysFever, cough
AsymptomaticTachycardiaIgG+
178.
Naveca F et al.—case 1 [105] *
2021Brazil29-year-old28120AMildFever, myalgia, cough, sore throat, nausea, and back pain
20J (P.1)MildFever, cough, sore throat, diarrhea, anosmia, ageusia, headache, runny nose, and resting pulse oximetry of 97%
179.
Naveca F et al.—case 2 [105] *
2021Brazil50-year-old15320BMildFever, cough, and tiredness
20J (P.1)MildCough, headache, and runny nose
180.
Naveca F et al.—case 3 [105] *
2021Brazil40-year-old woman28220AMildFever, headache, chest pain, and weakness
20J (P.1)MildSore throat and running nose
181.
Nazar N et al. [106]
2020India26-year-old man healthcare worker97N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
182.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 1
2021USA46-year-old man with hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, plantar fasciitis>90N/AMildFever, myalgias, sore throat, chills, headaches, nausea, shortness of breathSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 1st test: 1:4096 (BCM laboratory)
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 2nd test: 1:2048 (BCM laboratory)
183.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 2
2021USA27-year-old woman>90N/AMildCongestion, fatigue, loss of taste, loss of smell, headacheN/A
MilderFever, chills, fatigue
184.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 3
2021USA53-year-old man with hypertension, sleep apnea>90N/AMildCough, congestion, loss of taste, loss of smellSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 1st test: 1:2048 (BCM laboratory)
AsymptomaticAsymptomaticSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 2nd test: 1:1024 (BCM laboratory)
185.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 4
2021USA66-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, congestive heart failure, renal disease, gout, hypertension>90N/AMildFatigueN/A
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
186.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 5
2021USA73-year-old woman with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression>90N/AMildCongestion, sore throat, headacheN/A
MildCough, shortness of breath, congestion, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, headache
187.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 6
2021USA42-year-old woman with breast cancer>90N/AMildCough, shortness of breath, fatigue, loss of taste, loss of smell, headache, feverSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 1st test: 1:4096 (BCM laboratory)
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
188.
Nicholson EG et al. [107]—case 7
2021USA36-year-old man>90N/AMildCough, fatigue, nausea, loss of smell, feverSARS-CoV−2 IgG testing 1st test: 1:4096 (BCM laboratory), 2nd test: 1:4096 (BCM laboratory)
AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
189.
Nonaka CKV et al. [108]
2021Brazil45-year-old woman147Lineage B.1.1.33 with S:G1219C mutationMildDiarrhea, myalgia, asthenia, odynophagia for 7 daysN/A
Lineage P.2 (or B.1.1.28.2) with S:E484K mutationModerateHeadache, malaise, ageusia, muscle fatigue, insomnia, mild dyspnea, shortness of breath
190.
Novoa W et al. [109]
2021Colombia44-year-old male, healthcare worker103N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
ModerateMalaise, chills, headache, fever, odynophagia
191.
Ozaras R et al. [110]
2020Turkey23-year-old woman116N/AHospitalizedFever >39 °C, chills, fatigue, cough, headache, sore throat, muscle and joint painN/A
Recovered in 10 daysFever 28.7 °C, chills, fatigue, loss of appetite, taste and smell loss, muscle and joint painIgG slightly positive
192.
Pow T et al. [111]
2021USA40-year-old man89N/AMildFever, coughN/A
WorseDyspnea, tachycardia > death
193.
Prado-Vivar B et al. [28]
2020Ecuador46-year-old man63Nextstrain 20A/GISAID B1.p9 lineageMildIntense headache, drowsinessIgM+ IgG− on D7 of initial infection
Nextstrain 19B/GISAID A.1.1 lineage; 18 mutations differenceModerateOdynophagia, nasal congestion, fever 39 °C, back pain, productive cough, dyspneaIgM+ IgG+ on D28
194.
Quiroga B et al. [112]
2021Spain60-year-old male, with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
due to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis that received his first kidney transplant 2004
149N/AMildCough and low-grade feverAntibodies (IgM and IgG) for SARS-CoV2 resulted negative after reinfection
WorseRespiratory fever and acute injury of the allograft function. A chest X-ray showed bilateral infiltrates with unilateral pleural effusion > death
195.
Ramirez JD et al. [113]—case 3
2021Colombia54-year-old woman with hypertension, gastritis, arthrosis33B.1MildFever, cough, odynophagia, fatigueN/A
B.1.1.269MilderFever, odynophagia
196.
Rani PR et al. [114]
2021India47-year-old man4615 genetic variants with 22882T > G (Spike N440K)AsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
17 genetic variants with 22882T > G (Spike N440K)WorseFever, cough, malaise
197.
Resende PC et al. [115]
2021Brazil37-year-old healthcare worker woman116B.1.1.33MildHeadache, runny nose, diarrhea, myalgiaIgG+ after re-infection
VOI P.2 with mutation S-E484KMildHeadache, ageusia, anosmia, fatigue
198.
Rodríguez-Espinosa D et al. [116]
2021Spain76-year-old man with hypertension, biological aortic heart valve replacement, and end-stage kidney disease secondary to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease58 AsymptomaticAsymptomaticIgG and IgM to SARS-CoV-2 tested negative after 1st and 2nd episode
WorseFever, cough, and shortness of breath, bilateral pneumonia > death 18 days after admission
199.
Romano CM et al. [117]
2021Brazil26-year-old woman128Non-VOC virusMildDry cough, dizziness, headache, fatigue, stuffy nose, back pain, loss of taste, nausea, diarrhea
VOC-virus P.1 variantMildDry cough, dizziness, headache, fatigue, diarrhea, joint pain legs, difficult breathing
200.
Salcin S et al. [118]
2021USA62-year-old woman with hypertension, hypothyroidism, chronic lower back pain90N/AHospitalizedWorsening shortness of breath, cough, hypoxiaN/A
Worse with intubation twiceTachypnea, hypoxia, pneumonia
201.
Salehi-Vaziri M et al. [119]
2021Iran42-year-old man12820G with 11 mutationsMildCough, headache, severe diarrheaIgG and IgM negative
20G with 17 mutationsMildBody pain, shortness of breath, headache, anosmiaIgG and IgM negative
202.
Salehi-Vaziri M et al. [120]
2021Iran32-year-old woman63N/AMildHeadache, sore throat, cough, feverThe antibody titration was achieved positive by the rapid test (sensitivity 72%, specificity: 76%) for IgM (At the time of second infection, IgG titration was assessed as 4.89 AU/mL which after two months turned to a significant raise (over ELISA reader standard range).
D614G mutationWorseSevere cough, fever, fatigue
203.
Salehi-Vaziri M et al. [120]
2021Iran54-year-old man156L139L non-synonymous mutationMildFatigue, anxiety, chest pain, cough, feverIgM and IgG were detected in the first incidence, and he was being followed up to the second virus presentation. In the whole duration between two incidences, IgG test was positive. Antibody titration at the time of second infection showed that IgG level was 5.25 IU/mL which increased to 27.5 IU/mL after about 2 weeks.
L139L non-synonymous mutationMildMilder fatigue, chest pain, dizziness, diarrhea
204.
Salehi-Vaziri M et al. [120]
2021Iran42-year-old man111N/AMildShortness of breath, sore throat, shaking chills, pain, diarrheaThe IgG titration was 17.5 IU/mL which decreased to 6.5 IU/mL after almost 2 weeks.
D614G mutationMildSimilar to the first infection with severe diarrhea
205.
Salzer HJF [121]
2021Austria95-year old man with dementia, hypertension, total thyroidectomy124N/AMildFever, leukopeniaN/A
SeverePneumonia
206.
Sanyang B et al. [122]
2021Gambia31-year-old woman without comorbidities145B1MildMild
B1.1.74MildMild
207.
Sanyang B et al. [122]
2021Gambia36-year-old woman without comorbidities184B.1.235AsymptomaticAsymptomatic
B.1WorseMild
208.
Scarpati G et al. [123]
2021Italy63-year-old healthcare man with type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease299Clade 20AAsymptomaticAsymptomatic
Clade 20EWorseShortness of breath with rapid worsening of clinical presentation and recovering in intensive care unit > death
209.
Selhorst P et al. [124]
2020Belgium39-year-old female immunocompetent healthcare worker185Different clades: 19AMildCough, dyspnea, headache, fever, general malaiseIgG+
20AMilderDyspneaIgM and IgG+
210.
Selvaraj V. et al. [125]
2020USA70-year-old male with obesity, neuropathy, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension7 monthsN/AHospitalizedWorsening shortness of breath, tachypneic, mild, patchy mid and lower lung airspace disease bilaterallySARS-CoV-2 IgG−
HospitalizedShortness of breath, fever, body aches, nausea, malaise
211.
Sen MK et al. [126]
2020India78-year-old man with coronary artery disease57N/AMildFever, cough for 2 daysN/A
MildFever, cough, dyspnea for 1 day
212.
Sevillano G et al. [127]
2021Ecuador28-year-old man102B.1.1MildSore throat, cough, headache, nausea, diarrhea, anxiety, panic attackIgM and IgG negative after 1st infection
Different in 27 nucleotidesMildAnosmia, ageusia, fever, headacheIgM and IgG negative after 2nd infection
213.
Sharma R et al. [13]
2020Qatar57-year-old male with diabetes mellitus86N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomatic, screening for exposition to an infected work colleagueN/A
SymptomaticFever, myalgia, headache, productive coughIgM and IgG+
214.
Shastri J et al. [128]—Case A
2021India27-year-old male doctor66Lineage B.1Mild, 2 days of symptomsSore throat, nasal congestion, rhinitisN/A
Lineage B with 7 differencesMild, worse than initial (1 week)Myalgia, fever, non-productive cough, fatigueAbbott anti-NC IgG− on D5 of reinfection
215.
Shastri J et al. [128]—Case B
2021India31-year-old male doctor65Lineage B.1.1AsymptomaticNothingN/A
Lineage B.1.1 with 8SPSs in initial strain compared to reference not present in reinfection strain including D614GMild, worse than initial (2 days)Myalgia, malaiseAbbott NC IgG− on D7 of reinfection
216.
Shastri J et al. [128]—Case C
2021India27-year-old male doctor19Lineage B.1.1AsymptomaticAsymptomatic—screening prior going home to visit parentsN/A
Lineage B.1.1 with 9 SNPs compared to reference not present in initial infection strain including D614GMildFever, headache, myalgia not productive coughIgG/IgM/IgA−
217.
Shastri J et al. [128]—Case D
2021India24-year-old woman nurse55Lineage B.1.1Mild, 5 daysSore throat, rhinitis, myalgiaN/A
Lineage B.1.1 with 10SNPs compared to reference not present in initial infection strain including D614GMild, worse than initial—3 weeksFever, myalgia, rhinitis, sore throat, not productive cough, fatigueIgG/IgM/IgA−
218.
Shoar S et al. [129]
2021USA31-year-old healthcare worker man79N/ASevereMalaise, cough, shortness of breath, anosmia, =2 saturation to 88%, pneumoniaN/A
MilderMalaise, aphthous gingival ulcer, desquamating palmar lesion, fever, myalgia
219.
Sicsic I et al. [130]
2021USA69-year-old woman with asthma, hypercholesteremia, hypertension, OSA (obstructive sleep apnea)70N/AMildShortness of breath, dry cough, headache, fatigue, feversN/A
ModerateCough, fever, ageusia
220.
Siqueira JD et al. [131]
2021Brazil76-year-old woman with chronic renal failure and renal squamous cell carcinoma1049 single nucleotide variations (SNVs)SevereCough, fever, pneumoniaN/A
WorseCough, fever, pneumonia > death
221.
Soares da Silva et al. [132]
2021Brazil39-year-old man with chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus101P.1Not reportedNot reportedN/A
P.2WorseDyspnea, fatigue, respiratory distress > intubated > death 12 days after the onset of symptoms
222.
Staub T et al. [133] – case 1
2021FranceMid-20s healthcare worker man without comorbidities>83November N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticN/A
B1.351—identified in December 2020 in South AfricaWorseCough
223.
Staub T et al. [133]—case 2
2021FranceMid-20s healthcare worker woman without comorbidities288April 2020—N/AMildFever, headache, chills, diarrhea, loss of taste and smellN/A
B1.351MilderFever, headache, chills
224.
Staub T et al. [133]—case 4
2021FranceLate-20s healthcare worker woman without comorbidities90November 2020—N/AMildFever, muscle pain, headache, loss of taste and smellN/A
B1.351MilderCough, muscle pain
225.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 1
2020Brazil29-year-old man healthcare professional without comorbidities53N/AMildMyalgia, feverN/A
MildFever, anosmia, loss of taste
226.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 2
2020Brazil63-year-old man healthcare professional without comorbidities58N/AMildDiarrhea, feverN/A
MildHypoxemia, fever
227.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 3
2020Brazil40-year-old woman healthcare professional with ankylosing spondylitis and asthma70N/AModerateFever, Pneumonia, myalgiaNot specified
MildAnosmia, fever
228.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 4
2020Brazil67-year-old man healthcare professional with obesity, apnea syndrome, rhinitis54N/AMildCoryza, arthralgiaNot specified
Hospitalized with high-flow oxygen therapyHypoxia
229.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 5
2020Brazil47-year-old man healthcare professional without comorbidities56N/AMildMyalgia, feverNot specified
MildFever
230.
Takeda C et al. [134]
Patient 6
2020Brazil31-year-old man healthcare professional without comorbidities57N/AModerateHypoxemia, myalgia, diarrhea, feverNot specified
ModerateHypoxemia, fever
231.
Tang CY et al. [135]
2021USAFemale in 20s with asthma, obesity, anxiety, depression19PANGOLIN A.3 lineageMildCough, chills, exertional dyspnea, sore throat, dizziness, rhinorrhea, feverN/A
PANGOLIN B.1.1 lineageMilder
Cough, fatigue, dyspnea
232.
Tehrani HA et al. [136]
2021Iran15-year-old boy with acute myeloid leukemia M343N/AModerateCough, dyspnea, patchy infiltration in the left lungIgG+ IgM−
SevereFever, neutropenia, cough, myalgia and shivering, O2 saturation at 75%, pneumoniaIgG−
233.
Teka IA et al. [137]
2021Libya18-year-old man80N/AMildFever, headache, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, anosmiaIgG positive after re-infection
WorseFever, cough, muscle pain, dyspnea, hypoxia
234.
Tillett RL et al. [27]
2020USA (Nevada)25-year-old man without comorbidities48Clade 20CMildSore throat, cough, headache, nausea, diarrheaN/A
Clade 20C with 11SNP mutationSevere with hospitalizationFever, headache, dizziness, cough, nausea, diarrhea, hypoxia, shortness of breathRoche Elecsys Anrti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG+ on D8 of reinfection
235.
To KK et al. [5,138,139]
2020Hong KongA 33-year-old male142Nextstrain 19A/GISAID V/Pangolin lineage B.2Mild—hospitalizedFever, headache, cough, sore throatIgG negativity by ELISA or microsphere based antibody assay 10 days post symptom onset; IgG positivity but IgM negativity by indirect immunofluoresence assay; neutralizing antibody presence 10 days post-symptom onset with conventional and pseudovirus-based neutralization tests (VNTs)
Nextstrain 20A/GISAID G/Rambout B.1.79; 24 nucleotides differenceAsymptomatic, systematic screeningAsymptomaticIgG negativity by ELISA or microsphere based antibody assay 1 day post-hospitalization, but positivity at day 5; absence of neutralizing antibodies by VNTs and IgM negativity by IFI assay and CLIA 1 day post-hospitalization; then positivation on day 3; neutralizing antibody detection on day 3; IgG detection by IFon day 3; high affinity IgG
236.
Tomkins-Tinch C-H et al. [140]
2021USA61-year-old man with liver transplant due to chronic hepatitis B and C infections111Genome of 2nd episode differed by 11 to 12 single base substitutionsMildFever, nausea, vomiting, cough
WorseConfusion, hallucination, lethargy, hypoxiaAnti-SARS-CoV-2 assay positive after 2nd episode
237.
Tomassini S et al. case 9 [141]
2021UK93-year-old British male with multiple myeloma, cognitive impairment55N/A14 days—hospitalizedLethargy, reduced appetite, diarrhea
Cough, fever, dyspneaAbbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ on D58
238.
Tomassini S et al. case 24 [141]
2021UK82-year-old British male with atrial fibrillation, congestive cardiac failure, abdominal aortic aneurism, lung cancer, diabetes87N/AMild—hospitalizedFever, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, hemoptysis, hypoxia
MilderFever, cough, dyspneaAbbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ on D88. 92
239.
Torres DA et al. [142]
2020Brazil36-year-old female medical doctor without comorbidities87N/AModerateRhinorrhea, sore throat, low fever, diarrhea, asthenia, mild headache, erythematous vesicles on her right calf, severe musculoskeletal pain of the lower limbs, hyperesthesiaIgG− 23 days after the onset, IgM/IgG− after 33 and 67 days from onset
WorseNasal obstruction, hyaline rhinorrhea, sudden and complete anosmia and ageusia, frontal headache and asthenia, pneumoniaIgG+ at the 20th day
240.
Tuan J et al. [136]
2021USA44-year-old Hispanic man with type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity4 monthsN/ASevere with tracheostomyDyspnea, stridor, difficulty at breath,IgG+
MildFever, respiratory decompensation
241.
Ul-Haq Z et al. [143]
2020Pakistan41-year-old healthcare worker man133N/AMildFever, oxygen saturation of 90–92%, bilateral lung infiltrates, mild shortness of breath, loss of taste, severe restlessness, insomnia, body-achesSARS-CoV-2 antibodies: 1.97
MilderFever, moderate shortness of breath, loss of smell, moderate restlessness, insomnia, body achesSARS-CoV-2 antibodies: 0.08
242.
Van Elsland J et al. [29]
2020Belgium51-year-old woman with asthma93Pangolin Lineage B.1.1Moderate with self-quarantine for 2 weeksHeadache, myalgia, fever, cough, chest pain, dyspnea; some persisting symptoms for 5 weeksN/A
Lineage A; 11 nucleotide differencesMilder with resolution in 1 weekHeadache, cough, fatigue, rhinitisRoche nucleocapsid IgG+ on D7 of reinfection
243.
Vetter P et al. [144]
2021Switzerland36-year-old female physician205Clade 20AMildAsthenia, headache, slight memory lossPositivity for anti-S1 IgG and anti-N Ig at 14th and at 30th days
Clade 20A.EU2 with non-synonymous mutation in the S (S477N)MildAsthenia, shivering, rhinorrhea, anosmia, arthralgia, headache, exertional dyspnea for 10 daysPositivity for anti-S1 IgG and anti-N Ig
244.
Vora T et al. [145]
2021India58-year-old woman with hypertension, hypothyroidism120N/AMildFever, generalized body ache, running nose, soreness of throatTotal antibody and immunoglobulin G antibody test for COVID-19 were negative after first infection
MilderFever, generalized body ache, dry cough, throat pain
245.
Vora T et al. [145]
2021India58-year-old woman with hypertension and hypothyroidism91N/AMildLow-grade intermittent fever, generalized body ache, running nose and soreness of throatN/A
MildIntermittent fever, generalized body ache, dry cough, and throat pain
246.
West J et al. [146]
2021UK25-year-old male UK doctor17N/AMildHigh-grade fevers, headache of 3-day duration, severe fatigue lasting 3 weeksN/A
MilderFatigue, coryzal symptoms for 4 daysRest at home
247.
Yeleti R et al. [147]
2021USA25-year-old female medical student with vitiligo120N/AAsymptomaticAsymptomaticIgG+
SevereFever, abdominal pain, fatigue, vomiting and fulminant myocarditis with co-infection of parvovirus and SARS-CoV-2N/A
248.
Yu ALF et al. [148]
2021Brazil41-year-old woman with gastroplasty history146B.1.1.33 lineageMildHeadache, myalgia, fatigue, fever, dry cough, shortness of breath, anosmia, loss of tasteN/A
B.1.1.28 lineageMildHeadache, myalgia, fatigue, fever, dry cough, shortness of breath, anosmia, loss of taste, diarrhea, loss of appetite, dizziness
249.
Yu ALF et al. [148]
2021Brazil34-year-old healthcare worker woman with chronic respiratory disease173B.1.1.28 lineageMildFever, cough, odynophagia, dyspneaN/A
P2MildHeadache, running nose, fever, sore throat
250.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran50-year-old man230N/AN/AN/AN/A
251.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran81-year-old woman234N/AModerateN/AN/A
WorseDeath for COVID-19
252.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran42-year-old woman107N/AN/AN/AN/A
253.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran27-year-old man115N/AN/AN/AN/A
254.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran79-year-old man150N/AModerateN/AN/A
WorseDeath for COVID-19
255.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran86-year-old man164N/A ModerateN/AN/A
WorseDeath for COVID-19
256.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran90-year-old woman130N/AN/AN/AN/A
257.
Zare F et al. [149]
2021Iran13-year-old woman124N/AN/AN/AN/A
258.
Zhang K et al. [150]
2020China33-year-old female59N/AModerate—hospitalized for 16 days Reduction of IgG+ to −
ModerateIgG+
259.
Zhang K et al. [150]
2020China33-year-old female86N/ASevere—hospitalized for 38 days Reduction of IgG+ to weak+
ModerateIgM+ and IgG+
260.
Zucman N et al. [151]
2021South African58-year-old male with asthma120N/AMildDyspnea, feverIgG+
South African variant 501Y.V2Severe with intubation and mechanical ventilationDyspnea, fever, severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
* data from papers which are not certified by peer review, medRxiv or Research Square preprints. ** days from recovery not from 1 infection. NAAT: nasopharyngeal nucleic acid amplification test; AT: antibody test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo Muzio, L.; Ambosino, M.; Lo Muzio, E.; Quadri, M.F.A. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Is a New Challenge for the Effectiveness of Global Vaccination Campaign: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182011001

AMA Style

Lo Muzio L, Ambosino M, Lo Muzio E, Quadri MFA. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Is a New Challenge for the Effectiveness of Global Vaccination Campaign: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(20):11001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182011001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo Muzio, Lorenzo, Mariateresa Ambosino, Eleonora Lo Muzio, and Mir Faeq Ali Quadri. 2021. "SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Is a New Challenge for the Effectiveness of Global Vaccination Campaign: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 11001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182011001

APA Style

Lo Muzio, L., Ambosino, M., Lo Muzio, E., & Quadri, M. F. A. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection Is a New Challenge for the Effectiveness of Global Vaccination Campaign: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 11001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182011001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop