Next Article in Journal
Nutrition Supports Deconstructed and Disrupted: An Evaluation of a Multilevel School-Based Intervention during the Time of COVID
Next Article in Special Issue
Oral Health Status in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Pilot Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Subjective and Contextual Factors Surrounding E-Cigarette and Combustible Tobacco Product Use among Young Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Are Public Oral Care Services Evenly Distributed?—Nation-Wide Assessment of the Provision of Oral Care in Japan Using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dental Healthcare Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

by
Rabia Tariq Butt
1,
Omer Sefvan Janjua
2,
Sana Mehmood Qureshi
3,
Muhammad Saad Shaikh
4,
Julia Guerrero-Gironés
5,*,
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lozano
5,6 and
Muhammad Sohail Zafar
7,8
1
General Dental Practitioner, Al-Noor Clinics, Okara 56000, Pakistan
2
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, PMC Dental Institute, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
3
Department of Oral Pathology, PMC Dental Institute, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
4
Department of Oral Biology, Sindh Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi 75510, Pakistan
5
Gerodontology and Special Care Dentistry Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Medicine School, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
6
Cellular Therapy and Hematopoietic Transplant Research Group, Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia, Clinical University Hospital Virgen de laArrixaca, University of Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain
7
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah 41311, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11008; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111008
Submission received: 23 September 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Oral Health and Health Promotion Research)

Abstract

:
The hustle and bustle of the planet Earth have come to a halt thanks to the novel coronavirus. The virus has affected approximately 219 million people globally; taken the lives of 4.55 million patients as of September 2021; and created an ambiance of fear, social distancing, and economic instability. The purpose of this review article is to trace the historical origin and evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus is highly contagious with a unique feature of rapid mutations—the scientific research is paving the way for discoveries regarding novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) diagnosis, features, prevention, and vaccination. The connections between the coronavirus pandemic and dental practices are essential because COVID-19 is transmitted by aerosols, fomites, and respiratory droplets, which are also produced during dental procedures, putting both the patient and the dentist at risk. The main emphasis of this paper is to highlight the psychological, economic, and social impact of this pandemic on dental practices throughout the world and under what circumstances and guidelines can dental health care be provided. In the current situation of the pandemic, an appropriate screening tool must be established either by using rapid molecular testing or saliva point-of-care technology, which will be effective in identifying as well as isolating the potential contacts and carriers in hopes to contain and mitigate infection. The blessing in disguise is that this virus has united the leaders, scientists, health care providers, and people of all professions from all around the world to fight against a common enemy.

1. Introduction

Coronaviruses are a group of viruses causing common cold and flu-like symptoms, infecting both humans and animals [1]. Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disorder [1] due to severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first diagnosed case was in the “wet markets’’ of Wuhan (China) in December 2019 [1]. On 11 March 2020, the disease was announced as a global pandemic [2] by the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO reports more than 219 million COVID-19 cases globally [3]. SARS-CoV-2 is 88% identical to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-like CoV) derived from bats collected from eastern China in 2018 [4]. It possesses 79% genetic resemblance with SARS-CoV (2003) and 50% with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [4]. This virus is highly temperature-sensitive with maximum stability at 4 °C, but when the temperature is raised to 70 °C during the incubation period its inactivation time is reduced to 5 min [5,6]. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) can remain stable on inanimate surfaces up to 1.5 week, up to 180 min on printing papers, up to 48 h on clothes and wood, up to 96 h on smooth surfaces such as glass, and may survive for several days on stainless steel, plastics, and the inner or outer surface of surgical masks [5,7]. The purpose of the present review is to emphasize the impact of COVID-19 on dentistry, how the dentist can aid in its diagnosis, and its overall effects on the profession of dentistry worldwide. In addition to this, the article also highlights the role of teledentistry and newly established guidelines for providing dental health care amid the pandemic.

2. History and Evolution Novel Coronavirus

Epidemiological and genetic studies show that SARS-CoV-2 is zoonotic in origin [8]. The first transmission was from animal (bats and pangolins) to human (zoonosis), followed by inter-human transmissions [9]. However, human–animal transmission (anthroponosis) has also been hypothesized [10]. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 infected minks were reported in Sweden, Denmark, United States, Spain, and Netherlands [11]. Domestic dogs and cats of infected persons have also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 [12]. Dr. Almeida first identified coronavirus at St. Thomas Hospital, London, in 1964, where the virus caused flu-like symptoms in humans [13]. By 1967, scientists discovered similar human and animal viruses and called them due to their crown-like appearances [13]. In 2002, SARS-CoV emerged in southern China, spreading to 28 other countries [14]. More than 8000 people were infected by July 2003, with a mortality rate of 10% [14]. In 2012, MERS-CoV affected 1700 people in Saudi Arabia with a mortality rate of 36% [15,16]. The 2019-nCoV infecting humans was identified with the aid of next-generation sequencing by the end of 2019 [17]. Since its emergence in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has shown genetic diversity, attributed to a low fidelity viral polymerase and increased recombination frequency. Both of these factors promote a high mutation rate. These genomic mutations of COVID-19 virus have generated variants which have been sorted out in nine clades viz L, V, S, G, GH, GR, GV, GRY, and O. At the time of writing, clades G, GH, GR, and GRY are responsible for the majority of infections while clades L and V, which were responsible for the commencement of pandemic in December 2019, are almost extinct now. Since January 2021 onwards, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, and the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) derivatives of clade G are the predominant infections. These variants are demonstrating D614G, P323L, and F106F mutations, thus increasing the susceptibility of the virus for dissemination of disease [18]. D614G mutation first appeared in March 2020; B.1.1.7, which was labelled as UK variant, first emerged in September 2020. The South African variant (B.1.351) was first identified in December 2020 while the Brazilian variant or P.1 was first isolated in January 2021. B.1.617.2 was called the double variant and was first identified in December 2020 [19].

3. Specific Virology, Pathophysiology, and Life Cycle of COVID-19

Coronaviridae family possess a single-stranded RNA with the genomic length ranging from 26 to 32 kilobases [1] and can adapt to new environments through mutations causing long-term health effects [20]. The virus demonstrates round, elliptical, or a pleomorphic shape with an approximate diameter of 60–140 nm.
The SARS-CoV-2 life cycle [21], once entered into the human body, is presented in Figure 1. The SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology, once it has entered the human body through aerosol, is presented in Figure 2. The flow chart describes how the virus replicates inside the human body and how the body reacts to the replication of the virus. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 are given in Table 1 [22,23,24,25,26]. In serologic studies, 30% of individuals were symptomless [27]. However, the symptomatic patients reported coryza [27]. The re-infection frequency observed with SARS-CoV-2 is high and implies that antibody IgG is not protective [27].
The virus can infect individuals from all ages irrespective of any gender predilection; however, individuals who are above 60 years of age or those possessing co-morbidities like diabetes, asthma, obesity, ischemic heart disease, cancer, or patients who have undergone organ transplant comprise the high-risk group with almost a 12 times greater chance of fatality with SARS-CoV-2 infection than individuals falling in low risk category [21]. According to a study conducted in Jinyintan and Wuhan pulmonary hospital on 191 adult patients, 48% had comorbid conditions, including high blood pressure (30%), diabetes mellitus (19%), and coronary artery disease (8%) [28]. The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) conducted a survey where they analysed the relationship of co-morbidities associated with fatality and the results are presented in Table 2. Similarly, data from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians are at an increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection [21].

4. Transmission

The most common mode of human–human transmission occurs via droplets (coughing, sneezing, talking, and aerosol generating procedures) or blood with smaller droplets traveling a longer distance and larger droplets limited to nearby objects [30]. The effect of droplet size on the distance is shown in Figure 3.
Furthermore, the studies of conjunctival samples from suspected as well as confirmed 2019-nCoV cases advocates that exposure of eyes may be an efficient way for the virus entrance [32,33]; therefore, there is a need for using protective eye-wear while working in a dental practice and other areas where one may come in contact with potential and confirmed cases.

5. Diagnosis and Diagnostic Methods

The CDC, China, reported the viral genome sequence in the international database banks GenBank and Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data [32,34]. It helped labs to develop a particular real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) evaluation for its diagnosis [32]. Other diagnostic tests include molecular tests (digital PCR, next-generation sequencing, microarray analysis, and isothermal nucleic acid amplification) and antibody testing for prior infection [35]. The methods for testing are:
  • Nasopharyngeal swab.
  • Oropharyngeal swab.
  • Blood sampling for antibody detection (immunization).
  • Expectorated sputum in severe respiratory disease [36].
In terms of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods, sensitivity is the test’s capacity to identify all infected individuals. In contrast, specificity is the test’s ability to detect a particular pathogen [37]. Sensitivity of the RT-PCR varied depending on the specimen type: pharyngeal swab (32%), nasal swab (63%), sputum (72–75%), and bronchoalveolar lavage (93–95%) [38].

5.1. Saliva as a Diagnostic Tool

COVID-19 has also been detected in the saliva of infected patients [33]. There are three suspected pathways for SARS-CoV to be present in saliva:
  • Lower and upper respiratory tract → exchange of liquid droplets between the oral cavity and respiratory tract → virus in saliva [8,36]
  • Blood → virus via gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) enters oral cavity→ saliva [39]
  • SARS-CoV-2 → infection of salivary glands (rhesus macaques) → saliva [40]
Saliva is a cheap, accessible, and non-invasive diagnostic method with minimal risk of transmission and is currently serving as a biomarker for diagnosing and screening different diseases [41,42], including viral, fungal, or bacterial infections; various types of cancers; cardiovascular diseases; and developmental as well as genetic diseases [43,44,45]. It has substantial biomarkers and components, including DNA and RNA, various microorganisms, immunoglobulins, and metabolites [46]. Salivary glands are also a reservoir for the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor expression, the functional receptor for this virus [47,48]. Considerably lower expression of ACE-2 receptors has been found in the pharyngeal cells compared to the lower respiratory tract and salivary glands [47].

5.2. Gingival Crevicular Fluid

The GCF is an inflammatory exudate or serum transudate of the pathological or healthy periodontal tissues [49]. It is used for the detection of periodontal diseases, presence of drugs in the periodontal pockets through systematic circulation, and proteomic analysis [50] for isolation and assessment of different viruses (Herpes simplex, Epstein–Barr, and Cytomegalovirus) [51]. GCF can be collected by absorption technique using paper strips/points and can be a non-invasive method for isolating and diagnosing coronavirus and its pathway for entry into the oral cavity [52].

6. SARS-COV-2 Incubation Period in Humans

The mean incubation period after being infected is 5.1 days. During this period, the patient remains asymptomatic. Three weeks is the crucial period for COVID-19 because patients either died after 15 to 22 days or were discharged between 18 to 25 days from the onset of symptoms (Table 3) [28].

7. Management of COVID-19

At present, there are no approved and specific therapies for 2019-nCoV. Many immunotherapies and antiviral drugs are under investigation for COVID-19 (Table 4) [53].
Vaccination is considered the most effective defence against infectious diseases. The same is true for COVID-19; therefore, over 214 candidate vaccines from different pharmaceutical companies are being developed. The vaccines are broadly classified as: vaccines based on full-length S-protein, protein (RBD-based or S2 based subunit vaccines), inactivated vaccines, live attenuated vaccine, nucleic acid (DNA/mRNA) based vaccines, replicating and non-replicating viral vectors vaccine, and viral-like particle vaccine [69]. COVID-19 vaccines showed promising results by producing specific T cell-mediated immune responses and increased the number of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) [56]. Different vaccines for COVID-19 available are demonstrated in Table 5. Vaccination priorities include:
(1)
Healthcare professionals and inhabitants of long-term care facilities.
(2)
Essential workers (such as transportation, food service, finance, and health) and individuals aged 75 years or older.
(3)
Individuals aged 65 to 74 years; individuals aged 16 to 64 years with systemic conditions.
Once the people with priority have been successfully vaccinated, only then the general public will get the opportunity of getting vaccinated [70].
Vaccinations other than parenteral routes are also under development. Following are the examples of some of the vaccines which are under development and do not employ the parenteral route:
  • hAd5 T-cell (Immunity Bio and NantKwest) [76].
  • Intranasal COVID-19 vaccine (Ad COVID) [77].
  • ChAdOx1 nCov-19 inhaled (University of Oxford) [78].
Similarly, already available vaccines like BCG and MMR are being repurposed for developing immunity against COVID-19 as the literature has suggested that it may offer partial immunity against COVID-19 infection [71].

8. Oral Manifestations of COVID-19 Infection

Evaluation of 666 patients at a temporary field hospital in Spain showed that 45% had mucocutaneous symptoms and more than 25% had oral symptoms as follows [79]: The relative frequencies of oral manifestations are 11.5% (lingual papillitis), 6.9% (aphthous stomatitis), 6.6% (glossitis), 5.3% (burning mouth sensation), and 3.9% (patchy depapillation and mucositis) [79]. Other common findings were macroglossia, tongue discoloration/coated tongue [80], and COVID-19 tongue (geographic tongue) (Figure 4) [81,82]. These oral lesions were left undiagnosed in COVID-19 patients because the patients usually wear masks while presenting in hospitals.
Other authors have reported association of COVID-19 with irregular and aphthous like lesions; herpetiform or zosteriform lesions; generalized non-specific ulcerations; erosions on the tongue, palate, and labial mucosa; atrophic and hyperkeratotic patches on the tongue, gingiva, and palate; lesions resembling erythema multiforme; desquamative gingivitis; and angina bullosa-like lesions [83]. Similarly, petechiae, post-inflammatory pigmentation, and vesicular eruptions have also been described. Periodontal manifestations include aggressive necrotizing periodontal disease, which may be due to bacterial co-infection caused by Prevotella intermedia. Two cases with Kawasaki disease and Melkerson–Rosenthal syndrome have also been reported [84]. Halepas et al. has reported oral manifestations of COVID-19 infection in paediatric patients. According to him, red swollen lips were seen in 48.9% cases while 10.6% presented with strawberry tongue and represent multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children [85].
In addition, SARS-CoV-2 is known to affect the salivary glands directly, which can lead to xerostomia and inflammation of the major salivary glands [86]. Dryness of the oral cavity can also be produced by mouth breathing, dehydration, and COVID-19 related medications. Severe halitosis has also been reported in COVID-19 patients [83]. Usually, this xerostomia is self-limiting and transient in nature. However, it can lead to periodontal disease and caries in patients run a protracted course of the disease or who are hospitalized for longer durations. Transneuronal migration of SARS-CoV-2 can lead to neuronal death of cells of the olfactory bulb and the taste buds, which can explain the loss of taste and smell [87]. Release of cytokines as in cytokine storm and acute febrile illness can lead to specific viral and non-specific ulcerations, fissuring, and erythematous eruptions in the oral cavity. The common areas of involvement include lips, tongues, palate, and buccal mucosa [88].

8.1. The Role of ACE-2 in Oral Manifestations of COVID-19

The ACE-2 is most likely to be the cell receptor of the 2019-nCoV [80]. The ACE-2 receptors which bind the SARS-CoV-2 are abundantly found on the surfaces of the oral mucosa, particularly the tongue and masticatory mucosa of the gingiva (Figure 5) [49,80]. These findings elucidate the risk for potentially substantial COVID-19 infectious susceptibility for the oral cavity and dental practices [49,80]. The strong affinity between ACE-2 and COVID-19 S protein proposed that the patients with greater ACE-2 expression are more liable to COVID-19 [89,90]. The cellular serine protease Transmembrane protease, serine 2 also added to the S-protein priming of 2019-nCoV, signifying its potential to comprise a management option [91].

8.2. Dentistry Hazards

The highest level of aerosol contamination within 60 cm between the patient’s head and dentist’s right arm has been shown in the literature. Aerosols can remain suspended in the air for 30 min after a dental procedure [93]. SARS-CoV-2 viability is estimated to be 3 h with an adherence capability for one and a half weeks to different surfaces [94].

9. Economic and Emotional Impact on Dentists and Dental Practices

For almost a year now, this pandemic has affected dental care providers both psychologically and economically (Figure 6) [95]. In various countries, dental procedures were banned entirely to prevent viral transmission, thus creating a huge financial implication for dental professionals.
The infection control during dental healthcare amid the COVID-19 pandemic is demonstrated in Table 6 [96,97,98,99,100,101]. In terms of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on dental personals, Khanagar et al. reported increased mental stress and psychological distress among dentists [102]. Depression, anxiety, fear, and stress have adversely affected dentists across the globe. They experienced fear of being exposed at the workplace and then the possibility of transmitting the infection to the near and dear ones at home [103]. The same was the case with dental students. Suspension of regular classes and closure of their schools took a toll on them as well. They felt anxious and depressed as they believed that they could not learn the skill during online teaching, which will affect their professional career. A study by Hakami et al. has reported that this anxiety and stress was more prevalent among female dentists and dental assistants as compared to their male counterparts [104]. Quarantines, isolations, financial impact, and loss of family members due to COVID-19 put immense pressures on dental surgeons and up to the extent that some dental personnel have expressed suicidal thoughts [105].
A study conducted by Ahmadi et al. in Iran concluded that around 10% of the dentists and their staff members had COVID-19 related symptoms. They have also reported that 63% of the dentists had faced financial problems due to COVID-19 pandemic and 43% reported anxiety and depression with almost 50% of these required consultation with a psychiatrist [106]. Kamran et al. conducted a nationwide survey among dentists in Pakistan and have reported that a significant number of dental practitioners have modified their practices following COVID-19 related guidelines. According to their survey around 70% dentists have installed a physical barrier at their workplace and have tried to maintain 6 feet distance in the waiting area. They also report that 70–80% dentists were using N95 masks and PPE like face shields, gowns, etc., and were avoiding aerosol generating procedures [107]. These studies clearly highlight the economical and emotional toll COVID-19 has on the dental profession.
Disinfectants containing 1000 mg/Chlorine for the walls, floors, and dental operatory disinfection. Alcohol-based sanitizer (75% to 80%) is beneficial against SARS-CoV-2. The suggested disinfectant for SARS-CoV-2 for waste disinfection before disposal is sodium hypochlorite [99]. Povidone-iodine (0.23% to 7%) and hydrogen peroxide (1.5%) are suggested to decrease viral load as a pre-procedural mouth wash [121,122]. Surface disinfectants including ethanol (62–71%), hydrogen peroxide (0.5%), and sodium hypochlorite (0.1%) are also efficient against SARS-CoV-2 [123,124].

10. Categorization of Dental Procedures according to COVID-19 Guidelines

Various dental procedures are categorized as emergencies and non-emergencies according to COVID-19 guidelines. Their details are presented in Table 7 below.
The transmission can be manageable, i.e., decrease the viral transmission (via close contact or droplets), using the point-of-care technology [126]. Several guidelines have been recommended to prevent and control the disease at various levels of populations. The WHO also advocated recommendations for the decrease in viral load via the disinfection and cleaning [127,128,129]:
  • Wash hands with alcohol-based soap solution for 20 s.
  • Wear masks when outside.
  • Avoid touching face.
  • Stay 6 feet apart from each other.
  • Cover your face while coughing or sneezing.
  • Disinfect the surfaces used repeatedly (doorknobs, tables, and mobile phones).
  • Avoid crowded areas.
  • Isolate yourself if sick or at greater risk.

11. Aerosol Generating Procedures

The CDC says that aerosol generating procedures (Table 8 and Figure 7) are the medical procedures that produce greater concentrations of infective respiratory aerosols than sneezing, coughing, breathing, or speaking [130,131].
Aerosol-generating procedures are hazardous because they release micro-droplets into the air through spray generating equipment [136]. Severe and potentially life-threatening diseases are spread by droplets and aerosols, including pneumonic plague, tuberculosis, influenza, Legionnaire’s diseases, and SARS infections [137]. These droplets may remain in the air or travel long distances and may lead to inhaled infection (Table 9) [138]. Dental practitioners need to develop an understanding of the following [139,140]:
  • Risks associated with different modes of transmission (i.e., droplets, aerosols, and fomites).
  • The sources, nature, kinetics, and the quantity of microbial load in such aerosols.
  • The efficacy of current and emerging practices in mitigating aerosol-generated microbial load.
The coolant used with rotary handpieces and powered scalers has a flow rate of 10 to 40 mL per minute [141] which is 5- to 10-fold greater than unstimulated and stimulated saliva. The dilution of salivary or respiratory pathogens occurs in these settings, reducing the overall pathogenic microbial load and the infectivity of such aerosols. The facial pathologies and fractures management are of greater risk because of the viral load in the oral, nasal, and oropharyngeal mucosa. To reduce the risk of potential infections, we have to adopt principles of simplification of surgery, avoid complicated surgical procedures, and limit the operating times [142,143] as well as implement the various protocols listed in Table 10.
  • Cataloguing of suspicious or high-risk patients (history of fever, respiratory problems, travel history, and contact with a COVID-19 patient during the past 14 days) [143].
  • Repetition of triage [144].
  • Preoperative testing after 48 h, i.e., two RT-PCR tests 24 h apart with a sensitivity of at least 71% [145] (if both tests are not positive, perform surgery with improved airborne protections) [144].
  • Accommodation of patient in an isolated ward or room [144].
  • Execution pace of the preoperative preparation [143,144].
According to the guidelines for performing oral and maxillofacial surgery during COVID-19 by the Association of Osteosynthesis: Cranio-Maxillofacial (AO CMF):
The therapeutic and surgical procedure for facial fractures as suggested by AO CMF are as follows [144,147,151]:
  • Scalpel use over monopolar cautery for skin/mucosal incision.
  • Avoid intra-oral incision, repeated suctioning, and irrigation.
  • Elective surgery must be delayed for non-critical cancer patients unless it does not affect the prognosis.
  • Substitution of power saw by a low-speed drill or osteotome.
  • Application of a low power bipolar cautery for haemostasis.
The following Table 11 [157] highlights the international guidelines for COVID-19 issued by the professional organizations for maxillofacial guidelines [150], the United Kingdom National Health Service [9], the Australian Society for Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, and British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [145].

12. Association of Rhino-Cerebral Fungal Infections with COVID-19

Recent literature is showing an association of black fungus (fungal ball) of the lungs and maxillary sinuses with COVID-19 patients. Song et al. have reported an association of COVID-19 with aspergillus flavus, candida albicans, and candida glabrata. The overall incidence of invasive fungal infections along with COVID-19 co-infection was around 5% [158]. Rabaglaiti et al. studied the corelation of invasive mould infection in established COVID-19 patients and found the overall incidence to be around 11% with a mortality of around 30% in these patients [159]. Waizal-Haiat et al. have reported a case of fatal rhino-orbital mucormycosis along with diabetic ketoacidosis in a COVID-19 patient [160]. Mucormycosis, when it affects the maxillary sinus and orbit, usually presents as pain and swelling in the midface region, involving the eyelids and the nasal fold area. There can be associated paraesthesia of the involved infra-orbital nerve. Other signs and symptoms that can point towards rhino-cerebral mucormycosis can be mobile teeth in the maxilla with discharging sinuses; a presentation very similar to chronic osteomyelitis of the maxilla; black, necrosed palate; nasal blockage; and decreased visual acuity from the affected eye. CT scan or MRI is usually the gold standard for diagnosing involvement of the maxillary and or ethmoidal sinuses. There can be an associated epiphora due to blockage of the nasolacrimal apparatus by the fungus [161]. Management usually includes aggressive anti-fungal treatment through surgical debridement, management of the underlying immunosuppressing state, and supportive therapy to improve the nutritional status of the patients. However, despite all these aggressive treatment modalities, the mortality rate is high, and the disease usually carries a poor prognosis [162].

13. Conclusions

Despite scientific advancements, we are still unable to contain the spread of COVID-19, and scientists have yet to develop a definitive treatment for this disease. Currently, there is no evidence that dental healthcare professionals are at a higher risk of airborne viral disease transmission than the general population. Epidemiologic evidence of the prevalence of infections in dental healthcare providers and a comparison to populations as a whole may shine a light on highly protective infection control practices that can be implemented to keep practitioners and patients as safe as possible. Dental professionals should educate patients about the significance of good oral hygiene. Poor oral hygiene is associated with increased plaque deposits and bacterial load, which may lead to bacterial superinfection and risk of complications in COVID-19 patients. Our only preventative measure right now is vaccination and maintenance of cross-infection protocols which can be achieved through proper education of health care workers, patients, and the general public. The COVID-19 pandemic has given us an important message that even the superpowers can collapse and that the most intelligent nations can be startled. Mere weapons cannot defend us and the number of produced medicines cannot suffice our needs. Under the disguise of scientific revolution and industrialization, we have disrupted nature’s equilibrium. A critical question arises: will we realize the importance of our green planet in the post-COVID world?

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.T.B. and M.S.Z.; methodology, R.T.B. and O.S.J.; software, F.J.R.-L. and S.M.Q.; validation, R.T.B., M.S.Z., J.G.-G. and F.J.R.-L.; formal analysis, M.S.S. and M.S.Z.; investigation, R.T.B. and O.S.J.; resources, M.S.S., M.S.Z., J.G.-G. and F.J.R.-L.; data curation, R.T.B. and O.S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, R.T.B. and O.S.J.; writing—review and editing, M.S.Z., J.G.-G. and F.J.R.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Su, S.; Wong, G.; Shi, W.; Liu, J.; Lai, A.C.; Zhou, J.; Liu, W.; Bi, Y.; Gao, G.F. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Cucinotta, D.; Vanelli, M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hamid, H.; Khurshid, Z.; Adanir, N.; Zafar, M.S.; Zohaib, S. COVID-19 pandemic and role of human saliva as a testing biofluid in point-of-care technology. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14 (Suppl. 1), S123–S129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Chin, A.W.; Poon, L.L. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions—Authors’ reply. Lancet Microbe 2020, 1, e146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, P.; Poon, L.L.; Wang, Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 411–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saqlain, M.; Munir, M.M.; Rehman, S.U.; Gulzar, A.; Naz, S.; Ahmed, Z.; Tahir, A.H.; Mashhood, M. Knowledge, attitude, practice and perceived barriers among healthcare workers regarding COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 105, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Peng, X.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhou, X.; Ren, B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, S.; Han, J.; Lichtfouse, E. Backward transmission of COVID-19 from humans to animals may propagate reinfections and induce vaccine failure. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oreshkova, N.; Molenaar, R.J.; Vreman, S.; Harders, F.; Munnink, B.B.O.; Hakze-van Der Honing, R.W.; Gerhards, N.; Tolsma, P.; Bouwstra, R.; Sikkema, R.S. SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minks, the Netherlands, April and May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020, 25, 2001005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sit, T.H.; Brackman, C.J.; Ip, S.M.; Tam, K.W.; Law, P.Y.; To, E.M.; Veronica, Y.; Sims, L.D.; Tsang, D.N.; Chu, D.K. Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 586, 776–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tyrrell, D.A.J.; Fielder, M. Cold Wars: The Fight against the Common Cold; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rota, P.A.; Oberste, M.S.; Monroe, S.S.; Nix, W.A.; Campagnoli, R.; Icenogle, J.P.; Penaranda, S.; Bankamp, B.; Maher, K.; Chen, M.-H. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003, 300, 1394–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zaki, A.M.; Van Boheemen, S.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Fouchier, R.A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Groot, R.J.; Baker, S.C.; Baric, R.S.; Brown, C.S.; Drosten, C.; Enjuanes, L.; Fouchier, R.A.; Galiano, M.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Memish, Z.A. Commentary: Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (mers-cov): Announcement of the coronavirus study group. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 7790–7792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tan, W.; Zhao, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, W.; Niu, P.; Xu, W. A novel coronavirus genome identified in a cluster of pneumonia cases—Wuhan, China 2019–2020. China CDC Wkly. 2020, 2, 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Singh, J.; Pandit, P.; McArthur, A.G.; Banerjee, A.; Mossman, K. Evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Williams, H.; Hutchinson, D.; Stone, H. Watching Brief: The evolution and impact of COVID-19 variants B. 1.1. 7, B. 1.351, P. 1 and B. 1.617. Glob. Biosecur. 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Graham, R.L.; Baric, R.S. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: Mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 3134–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Khade, S.M.; Yabaji, S.M.; Srivastava, J. An update on COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 life cycle, immunopathology, and BCG vaccination. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 51, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Agyeman, A.A.; Chin, K.L.; Landersdorfer, C.B.; Liew, D.; Ofori-Asenso, R. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aragão, M.d.F.V.V.; Leal, M.; Cartaxo Filho, O.; Fonseca, T.; Valença, M. Anosmia in COVID-19 associated with injury to the olfactory bulbs evident on MRI. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020, 41, 1703–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mao, L.; Wang, M.; Chen, S.; He, Q.; Chang, J.; Hong, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Jin, H. Neurological manifestations of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective case series study. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, Z.-M.; Fu, J.-F.; Shu, Q.; Chen, Y.-H.; Hua, C.-Z.; Li, F.-B.; Lin, R.; Tang, L.-F.; Wang, T.-L.; Wang, W. Diagnosis and treatment recommendations for pediatric respiratory infection caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus. World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2020, 16, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2020, 323, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hierholzer, J.C.; Tannock, G.A. Coronaviridae: The coronaviruses. In Laboratory Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases Principles and Practice; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 451–483. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Franki, R. Comorbidities the Rule in New York’s COVID-19 Deaths. Available online: https://www.mdedge.com/chestphysician/article/220457/coronavirus-updates/comorbidities-rule-new-yorks-covid-19-deaths (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  30. Xie, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, L. Exhaled droplets due to talking and coughing. J. R. Soc. Interface 2009, 6, S703–S714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Checchi, V.; Bellini, P.; Bencivenni, D.; Consolo, U. COVID-19 dentistry-related aspects: A literature overview. Int. Dent. J. 2021, 71, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. To, K.K.-W.; Tsang, O.T.-Y.; Yip, C.C.-Y.; Chan, K.-H.; Wu, T.-C.; Chan, J.M.-C.; Leung, W.-S.; Chik, T.S.-H.; Choi, C.Y.-C.; Kandamby, D.H. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 841–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. WHO. Novel Coronavirus—China (Emergencies Preparedness, Response). Available online: https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-china/en/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  35. Habibzadeh, P.; Mofatteh, M.; Silawi, M.; Ghavami, S.; Faghihi, M.A. Molecular diagnostic assays for COVID-19: An overview. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2021, 58, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kubina, R.; Dziedzic, A. Molecular and serological tests for COVID-19 a comparative review of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus laboratory and point-of-care diagnostics. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, L.; Tu, L. Implications of gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 629–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silva-Boghossian, C.M.; Colombo, A.P.V.; Tanaka, M.; Rayo, C.; Xiao, Y.; Siqueira, W.L. Quantitative proteomic analysis of gingival crevicular fluid in different periodontal conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, L.; Wei, Q.; Alvarez, X.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, J.; Lam, P.; Zhang, L. Epithelial cells lining salivary gland ducts are early target cells of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in the upper respiratory tracts of rhesus macaques. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 4025–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Khurshid, Z.; Zohaib, S.; Najeeb, S.; Zafar, M.S.; Slowey, P.D.; Almas, K. Human saliva collection devices for proteomics: An update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Khurshid, Z.; Zafar, M.; Khan, E.; Mali, M.; Latif, M. Human saliva can be a diagnostic tool for Zika virus detection. J. Infect. Public Health 2019, 12, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abdul Rehman, S.; Khurshid, Z.; Hussain Niazi, F.; Naseem, M.; Al Waddani, H.; Sahibzada, H.A.; Sannam Khan, R. Role of salivary biomarkers in detection of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Proteomes 2017, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sahibzada, H.A.; Khurshid, Z.; Khan, R.S.; Naseem, M.; Siddique, K.M.; Mali, M.; Zafar, M.S. Salivary IL-8, IL-6 and TNF-α as potential diagnostic biomarkers for oral cancer. Diagnostics 2017, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Khurshid, Z.; Zafar, M.S.; Khan, R.S.; Najeeb, S.; Slowey, P.D.; Rehman, I.U. Role of salivary biomarkers in oral cancer detection. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2018, 86, 23–70. [Google Scholar]
  46. Khurshid, Z.; Moin, S.F.; Khan, R.S.; Agwan, M.A.S.; Alwadaani, A.H.; Zafar, M.S. Human salivary protein extraction from RNAPro· SAL™, Pure· SAL™, and passive drooling method. Eur. J. Dent. 2017, 11, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Hamming, I.; Timens, W.; Bulthuis, M.; Lely, A.; Navis, G.V.; van Goor, H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, L.; Zhao, J.; Peng, J.; Li, X.; Deng, X.; Geng, Z.; Shen, Z.; Guo, F.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, Y. Detection of 2019-nCoV in saliva and characterization of oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Cell Prolif. 2020, 53, e12923. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Shaikh, M.S.; Lone, M.A.; Kabir, R.; Apu, E.H. Periodontal connections to the coronavirus disease 2019: An unexplored novel path? Adv. Hum. Biol. 2020, 10, 197–198. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin, P.-H.; Yeh, S.-K.; Huang, W.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, C.-H.; Sheu, J.-R.; Lin, C.-T.; Huang, Y.-K. Research performance of biomarkers from biofluids in periodontal disease publications. J. Dent. Sci. 2015, 10, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Grenier, G.; Gagnon, G.; Grenier, D. Detection of herpetic viruses in gingival crevicular fluid of patients suffering from periodontal diseases: Prevalence and effect of treatment. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 24, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Majeed, Z.N.; Philip, K.; Alabsi, A.; Pushparajan, S.; Swaminathan, D. Identification of gingival crevicular fluid sampling, analytical methods, and oral biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of periodontal diseases: A systematic review. Dis. Markers 2016, 2016, 1804727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Zimmer, C.; Corum, J.; Wee, S. Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  54. Sheahan, T.P.; Sims, A.C.; Zhou, S.; Graham, R.L.; Pruijssers, A.J.; Agostini, M.L.; Leist, S.R.; Schäfer, A.; Dinnon, K.H.; Stevens, L.J. An orally bioavailable broad-spectrum antiviral inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in human airway epithelial cell cultures and multiple coronaviruses in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eabb5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Agostini, M.L.; Pruijssers, A.J.; Chappell, J.D.; Gribble, J.; Lu, X.; Andres, E.L.; Bluemling, G.R.; Lockwood, M.A.; Sheahan, T.P.; Sims, A.C. Small-molecule antiviral β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine inhibits a proofreading-intact coronavirus with a high genetic barrier to resistance. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e01348-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bakadia, B.M.; He, F.; Souho, T.; Lamboni, L.; Ullah, M.W.; Boni, B.O.; Ahmed, A.A.Q.; Mukole, B.M.; Yang, G. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19: Focus on interferons, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and vaccine. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 133, 111008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Schreiber, G. The role of type I interferons in the pathogenesis and treatment of COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 595739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Abdolvahab, M.H.; Moradi-Kalbolandi, S.; Zarei, M.; Bose, D.; Majidzadeh-A, K.; Farahmand, L. Potential role of interferons in treating COVID-19 patients. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 90, 107171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Echeverría-Esnal, D.; Martin-Ontiyuelo, C.; Navarrete-Rouco, M.E.; De-Antonio Cuscó, M.; Ferrández, O.; Horcajada, J.P.; Grau, S. Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: A review. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021, 19, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bleyzac, N.; Goutelle, S.; Bourguignon, L.; Tod, M. Azithromycin for COVID-19: More than just an antimicrobial? Clin. Drug Investig. 2020, 40, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wei, Q.; Lin, H.; Wei, R.-G.; Chen, N.; He, F.; Zou, D.-H.; Wei, J.-R. Tocilizumab treatment for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2021, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tleyjeh, I.M.; Kashour, Z.; Damlaj, M.; Riaz, M.; Tlayjeh, H.; Altannir, M.; Altannir, Y.; Al-Tannir, M.; Tleyjeh, R.; Hassett, L. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients: A living systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 27, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Campochiaro, C.; Della-Torre, E.; Cavalli, G.; De Luca, G.; Ripa, M.; Boffini, N.; Tomelleri, A.; Baldissera, E.; Rovere-Querini, P.; Ruggeri, A. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 patients: A single-centre retrospective cohort study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2020, 76, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chatterjee, K.; Wu, C.-P.; Bhardwaj, A.; Siuba, M. Steroids in COVID-19: An overview. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2020, 87, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Waterer, G.W.; Rello, J. Steroids and COVID-19: We need a precision approach, not one size fits all. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2020, 9, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Halpin, D.M.; Singh, D.; Hadfield, R.M. Inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19: A systematic review and clinical perspective. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 2001009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Madsen, L.W. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19-Final Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 338, 1813–1826. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nichols, B.E.; Jamieson, L.; Zhang, S.R.; Rao, G.A.; Silal, S.; Pulliam, J.R.; Sanne, I.; Meyer-Rath, G. The Role of Remdesivir in South Africa: Preventing COVID-19 Deaths Through Increasing Intensive Care Unit Capacity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 1642–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Belete, T.M. Review on up-to-date status of candidate vaccines for COVID-19 disease. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. CDC. How CDC Is Making COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations-process.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fvaccines%2Frecommendations.html (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  71. Malik, J.A.; Mulla, A.H.; Farooqi, T.; Pottoo, F.H.; Anwar, S.; Rengasamy, K.R. Targets and strategies for vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137, 111254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nag, K.; Baray, J.C.; Khan, M.R.; Mahmud, A.; Islam, J.; Myti, S.; Ali, R.; Sarker, E.H.; Kumar, S.; Chowdhury, M.H. An mRNA-based vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2 elicits stable immuno-response with single dose. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3745–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Stephenson, K.E.; Le Gars, M.; Sadoff, J.; de Groot, A.M.; Heerwegh, D.; Truyers, C.; Atyeo, C.; Loos, C.; Chandrashekar, A.; McMahan, K. Immunogenicity of the Ad26. COV2. S Vaccine for COVID-19. JAMA 2021, 325, 1535–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, H.; Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Chu, K.; Han, W.; Chen, Z.; Tang, R.; Yin, W. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase ½ clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, Z.; Xu, W.; Xia, S.; Gu, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Y.; Cai, X.; Qu, D. RBD-Fc-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate induces highly potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody response. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2020, 5, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. NantKwest. ImmunityBio and NantKwest Announce FDA Authorization to Study hAd5 T-Cell COVID-19 Vaccine for Combination of Subcutaneous, Oral and Sublingual Boost to Induce T-Cell, Mucosal, and Antibody Immunity. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210211005960/en/ImmunityBio-and-NantKwest-Announce-FDA-Authorization-to-Study-hAd5-T-Cell-COVID-19-Vaccine-for-Combination-of-Subcutaneous-Oral-and-Sublingual-Boost-to-Induce-T-Cell-Mucosal-and-Antibody-Immunity (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  77. ClinicalTrials.gov. Safety and Immunogenicity of AdCOVID in Healthy Adults (COVID-19 Vaccine Study). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04679909 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  78. O’Hare, R. Landmark Coronavirus Study to Trial Inhaled Imperial and Oxford Vaccines. Available online: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/203653/landmark-coronavirus-study-trial-inhaled-imperial/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  79. Nuno-Gonzalez, A.; Martin-Carrillo, P.; Magaletsky, K.; Martin Rios, M.; Herranz Mañas, C.; Artigas Almazan, J.; García Casasola, G.; Perez Castro, E.; Gallego Arenas, A.; Mayor Ibarguren, A. Prevalence of mucocutaneous manifestations in 666 patients with COVID-19 in a field hospital in Spain: Oral and palmoplantar findings. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 184, 184–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xu, H.; Zhong, L.; Deng, J.; Peng, J.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Q. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alikhani, M.; Khalighinejad, N.; Ghalaiani, P.; Khaleghi, M.A.; Askari, E.; Gorsky, M. Immunologic and psychologic parameters associated with geographic tongue. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014, 118, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hathway, R. COVID tongue. Br. Dent. J. 2021, 230, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Farid, H.; Khan, M.; Jamal, S.; Ghafoor, R. Oral manifestations of Covid-19-A literature review. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, e2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Iranmanesh, B.; Khalili, M.; Amiri, R.; Zartab, H.; Aflatoonian, M. Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: A review article. Dermatol. Ther. 2021, 34, e14578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Halepas, S.; Lee, K.C.; Myers, A.; Yoon, R.K.; Chung, W.; Peters, S.M. Oral manifestations of COVID-2019-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A review of 47 pediatric patients. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2021, 152, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Halboub, E.; Al-Maweri, S.A.; Alanazi, R.H.; Qaid, N.M.; Abdulrab, S. Orofacial manifestations of COVID-19: A brief review of the published literature. Braz. Oral Res. 2020, 34, e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Amorim Dos Santos, J.; Normando, A.G.C.; Carvalho da Silva, R.L.; Acevedo, A.C.; De Luca Canto, G.; Sugaya, N.; Santos-Silva, A.R.; Guerra, E.N.S. Oral Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review. J. Dent. Res. 2021, 100, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Farook, F.F.; Nuzaim, M.N.M.; Ababneh, K.T.; Alshammari, A.; Alkadi, L. Covid-19 Pandemic and Challenges of Dentistry: COVID-19 Pandemic: Oral Health Challenges and Recommendations. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, S165–S170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Guy, J.; Lambert, D.; Warner, F.; Hooper, N.; Turner, A. Membrane-associated zinc peptidase families: Comparing ACE and ACE2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1751, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wu, C.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, M. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCoV, in the nasal tissue. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Krüger, N.; Mueller, M.A.; Drosten, C.; Pöhlmann, S. The novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) uses the SARS-coronavirus receptor ACE2 and the cellular protease TMPRSS2 for entry into target cells. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Martín Carreras-Presas, C.; Amaro Sánchez, J.; López-Sánchez, A.F.; Jané-Salas, E.; Somacarrera Pérez, M.L. Oral vesiculobullous lesions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Oral Dis. 2020, 27 (Suppl. 3), 710–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Legnani, P.; Checchi, L.; Pelliccioni, G.; D’Achille, C. Atmospheric contamination during dental procedures. Quintessence Int. 1994, 25, 435–439. [Google Scholar]
  94. Veena, H.; Mahantesha, S.; Joseph, P.A.; Patil, S.R.; Patil, S.H. Dissemination of aerosol and splatter during ultrasonic scaling: A pilot study. J. Infect. Public Health 2015, 8, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. ADA. COVID-19 Economic Impacts on Dental Practices by American Dental Association. Available online: https://www.ada.org/en/science-research/health-policy-institute/covid-19-dentists-economic-impact/survey-results (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  96. Elkarim, I.; Abdulla, Z.; Yahia, N.; AlQudah, A.; Ibrahim, Y. Basic infection control procedures in dental practice in Khartoum—Sudan. Int. Dent. J. 2004, 54, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Loeb, M.; Dafoe, N.; Mahony, J.; John, M.; Sarabia, A.; Glavin, V.; Webby, R.; Smieja, M.; Earn, D.J.; Chong, S. Surgical mask vs. N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: A randomized trial. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2009, 302, 1865–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Singh, V.; Nagaraja, C.; Hungund, S.A. A study of different modes of disinfection and their effect on bacterial load in dental unit waterlines. Eur. J. Gen. Dent. 2013, 2, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sarfaraz, S.; Shabbir, J.; Mudasser, M.A.; Khurshid, Z.; Al-Quraini, A.A.A.; Abbasi, M.S.; Ratnayake, J.; Zafar, M.S. Knowledge and attitude of dental practitioners related to disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc. Healthc. 2020, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, Y.; Ning, Z.; Chen, Y.; Guo, M.; Liu, Y.; Gali, N.K.; Sun, L.; Duan, Y.; Cai, J.; Westerdahl, D. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature 2020, 582, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Radonovich, L.J.; Simberkoff, M.S.; Bessesen, M.T.; Brown, A.C.; Cummings, D.A.; Gaydos, C.A.; Los, J.G.; Krosche, A.E.; Gibert, C.L.; Gorse, G.J. N95 respirators vs. medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: A randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2019, 322, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Khanagar, S.B.; Alfadley, A. Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Dental Interns in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2020, 13, 508–512. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ahmed, M.A.; Jouhar, R.; Ahmed, N.; Adnan, S.; Aftab, M.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z. Fear and practice modifications among dentists to combat novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17, 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Uhlen, M.; Ansteinsson, V.; Stangvaltaite-Mouhat, L.; Korzeniewska, L.; Skudutyte-Rysstad, R.; Shabestari, M.; Mdala, I.; Hovden, E. Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental health personnel in Norway. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hakami, Z.; Khanagar, S.B.; Vishwanathaiah, S.; Hakami, A.; Bokhari, A.M.; Jabali, A.H.; Alasmari, D.; Aldrees, A.M. Psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on dental students: A nationwide study. J. Dent. Educ. 2021, 85, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ranka, M.S.; Ranka, S.R. Survey of Mental Health of Dentists in the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2021, 11, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  107. Ahmadi, H.; Ebrahimi, A.; Ghorbani, F. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on dental practice in Iran: A questionnaire-based report. BMC Oral Health 2020, 20, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kamran, R.; Saba, K.; Azam, S. Impact of COVID-19 on Pakistani dentists: A nationwide cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Niazi, M.I.K.; Ghafoor, S. Teledentistry and COVID-19: Today and Tomorrow. Biomedica 2020, 36, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chopra, S.S.; Sahoo, N.K. Protocol for teledentistry during COVID-19 in Armed Forces dental establishments. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2020, 76, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Khan, J.A.; Ali, B.; Aslam, K.; Hasan, A.; Ali, A.; Charania, A.; Phil, B. Dental Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidelines for Teaching Hospital OPDs. J. Pak. Dent. Assoc. 2020, 29, S43–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Izzetti, R.; Nisi, M.; Gabriele, M.; Graziani, F. COVID-19 transmission in dental practice: Brief review of preventive measures in Italy. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Razmara, F.; Khayamzadeh, M.; Shabankare, G. Dental practice in the era of COVID-19: A review of literature. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2021, 10, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  114. Bhanushali, P.; Katge, F.; Deshpande, S.; Chimata, V.K.; Shetty, S.; Pradhan, D. COVID-19: Changing trends and its impact on future of dentistry. Int. J. Dent. 2020, 2020, 8817424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Peditto, M.; Scapellato, S.; Marcianò, A.; Costa, P.; Oteri, G. Dentistry during the COVID-19 epidemic: An Italian workflow for the management of dental practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Parihar, A.V.; Sahoo, R.; Parihar, S. Dental practice in Covid times—An overview. Indian J. Prev. Soc. Med. 2020, 51, 48–60. [Google Scholar]
  117. Patel, M. Infection control in dentistry during COVID–19 pandemic: What has changed? Heliyon 2020, 6, e05402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Villani, F.A.; Aiuto, R.; Paglia, L.; Re, D. COVID-19 and dentistry: Prevention in dental practice, a literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2020, 17, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shi, A.H.; Guo, W.; Chng, C.K.; Chan, B.H. Precautions when providing dental care during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 2020, 49, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Meng, L.; Hua, F.; Bian, Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Parhar, H.S.; Tasche, K.; Brody, R.M.; Weinstein, G.S.; O’Malley, B.W., Jr.; Shanti, R.M.; Newman, J.G. Topical preparations to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosolization in head and neck mucosal surgery. Head Neck 2020, 42, 1268–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kirk-Bayley, J.; Sunkaraneni, S.; Challacombe, S. The Use of Povidone Iodine Nasal Spray and Mouthwash During the Current COVID-19 Pandemic May Reduce Cross Infection and Protect Healthcare Workers. SSRN 2020. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3563092 (accessed on 1 May 2021). [CrossRef]
  123. Hui, D.S. Epidemic and emerging coronaviruses (severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome). Clin. Chest Med. 2017, 38, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kampf, G. Potential role of inanimate surfaces for the spread of coronaviruses and their inactivation with disinfectant agents. J. Infect. Prev. 2020, 2, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. ADA Develops Guidance on Dental Emergency, Nonemergency Care: Recommendations Part of Dentists’ Response over COVID-19 Concerns. Available online: https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2020-archive/march/ada-develops-guidance-on-dental-emergency-nonemergency-care (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  126. Malik, Y.S.; Kumar, N.; Sircar, S.; Kaushik, R.; Bhat, S.; Dhama, K.; Gupta, P.; Goyal, K.; Singh, M.P.; Ghoshal, U. Coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19): Challenges and a global perspective. Pathogens 2020, 9, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. TFSS. Practitioners specialized in oral health and coronavirus disease 2019: Professional guidelines from the French society of stomatology, maxillofacial surgery and oral surgery, to form a common front against the infectious risk. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 121, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Lin, L.; Li, T. Interpretation of “Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection by the national health commission (Trial version 5)”. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2020, 100, E001. [Google Scholar]
  129. Adhikari, S.P.; Meng, S.; Wu, Y.-J.; Mao, Y.-P.; Ye, R.-X.; Wang, Q.-Z.; Sun, C.; Sylvia, S.; Rozelle, S.; Raat, H. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: A scoping review. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. RCSLT. The Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Guidance on Reducing the Risk of Transmission and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in the Context of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.rcslt.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/RCSLT-guidance-on-reducing-risk-of-transmission-PPE_Jan-2021-update.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  131. Speech Pathology Australia Guidance for Service Delivery, clinical procedures and infection control during COVID-19 pandemic. Aerosol Generating Procedures and Exposure to Aerosols. Available online: https://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/SPAweb/About_us/COVID-19_News_and_Information/COVID-19_-_Guidance_for_Service_Delivery/SPAweb/About_Us/COVID-19/Guidance_for_Service_Delivery.aspx?hkey=fc19a880-e7a8-4246-8631-a474fc43d4ae (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  132. El-Boghdadly, K.; Wong, D.; Owen, R.; Neuman, M.; Pocock, S.; Carlisle, J.; Johnstone, C.; Andruszkiewicz, P.; Baker, P.; Biccard, B. Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: A prospective international multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jackson, T.; Deibert, D.; Wyatt, G.; Durand-Moreau, Q.; Adisesh, A.; Khunti, K.; Khunti, S.; Smith, S.; Chan, X.H.S.; Ross, L. Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: A rapid systematic review. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2020, 7, e000730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Tran, K.; Cimon, K.; Severn, M.; Pessoa-Silva, C.L.; Conly, J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Geisinger, M. Into the Unknown: Emerging Evidence Regarding Risks of Aerosols in the Dental Office. Available online: https://orthopracticeus.com/into-the-unknown-emerging-evidence-regarding-risks-of-aerosols-in-the-dental-office/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  136. Knibbs, L.D.; Johnson, G.R.; Kidd, T.J.; Cheney, J.; Grimwood, K.; Kattenbelt, J.A.; O’Rourke, P.K.; Ramsay, K.A.; Sly, P.D.; Wainwright, C.E. Viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cough aerosols generated by persons with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2014, 69, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Harrel, S.K.; Molinari, J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: A brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2004, 135, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hatagishi, E.; Okamoto, M.; Ohmiya, S.; Yano, H.; Hori, T.; Saito, W.; Miki, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Saito, R.; Yamamoto, T. Establishment and clinical applications of a portable system for capturing influenza viruses released through coughing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Yan, J.; Grantham, M.; Pantelic, J.; De Mesquita, P.J.B.; Albert, B.; Liu, F.; Ehrman, S.; Milton, D.K.; Consortium, E. Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Wood, M.E.; Stockwell, R.E.; Johnson, G.R.; Ramsay, K.A.; Sherrard, L.J.; Jabbour, N.; Ballard, E.; O’Rourke, P.; Kidd, T.J.; Wainwright, C.E. Face masks and cough etiquette reduce the cough aerosol concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Micik, R.E.; Miller, R.L.; Mazzarella, M.A.; Ryge, G. Studies on dental aerobiology: I. Bacterial aerosols generated during dental procedures. J. Dent. Res. 1969, 48, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Gu, Y.; Co, B.; Lu, J.; Yang, Y.; Ding, M.; Ma, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Tian, L. Clinical analysis of 25 oral and maxillofacial emergency patients during the period of COVID-19 epidemic. Chin. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 18, 105. [Google Scholar]
  143. Barca, I.; Cordaro, R.; Kallaverja, E.; Ferragina, F.; Cristofaro, M.G. Management in oral and maxillofacial surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Our experience. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 58, 687–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Yang, Y.; Soh, H.Y.; Cai, Z.G.; Peng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, C.B. Experience of diagnosing and managing patients in oral maxillofacial surgery during the prevention and control period of the new coronavirus pneumonia. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 23, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  145. National Health Service, England. Clinical Guide for Management of Patients Requiring Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during the Coronavirus Pandemic; 2020; Available online: https://www.baoms.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/professionals/covid_19/specialty_guide_omfs_and_coronavirus_v1_20_march.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  146. Kariwa, H.; Fujii, N.; Takashima, I. Inactivation of SARS coronavirus by means of povidone-iodine, physical conditions and chemical reagents. Dermatology 2006, 212, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Eggers, M.; Koburger-Janssen, T.; Eickmann, M.; Zorn, J. In vitro bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of povidone-iodine gargle/mouthwash against respiratory and oral tract pathogens. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2018, 7, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Xue, Y.; Han, B.; Pan, J.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Hu, K. Suggestions for how to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 during oral surgeries. Chin. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 18, 198–203. [Google Scholar]
  149. Hsieh, T.-Y.; Dedhia, R.D.; Chiao, W.; Dresner, H.; Barta, R.J.; Lyford-Pike, S.; Hamlar, D.; Stephan, S.J.; Schubert, W.; Hilger, P.A. A guide to facial trauma triage and precautions in the COVID-19 pandemic. Facial Plast. Surg. Aesthet. Med. 2020, 22, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chinese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Expert proposal for the management of oral maxillofacial surgery during the epidemic period of 2019-nCoV. Chin. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 18, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  151. Ma, S.; Yuan, Z.; Peng, Y.; Luo, Q.; Song, H.; Xiang, F.; Tan, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, N.; Hu, G. Recommendations for the regulation of medical practices of burn treatment during the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2020, 36, E004. [Google Scholar]
  152. Givi, B.; Schiff, B.A.; Chinn, S.B.; Clayburgh, D.; Iyer, N.G.; Jalisi, S.; Moore, M.G.; Nathan, C.-A.; Orloff, L.A.; O’Neill, J.P. Safety recommendations for evaluation and surgery of the head and neck during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2020, 146, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Grant, M.; Buchbinder, D.; Dodson, T.B.; Fusetti, S.; Leung, M.Y.Y.; Aniceto, G.S.; Schramm, A.; Strong, E.B.; Wolvius, E. AO CMF international task force recommendations on best practices for maxillofacial procedures during COVID-19 pandemic. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2020, 13, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Patel, Z.M.; Fernandez-Miranda, J.; Hwang, P.H.; Nayak, J.V.; Dodd, R.; Sajjadi, H.; Jackler, R.K. Precautions for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurosurgery 2020, 87, E66–E67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Licina, A.; Silvers, A.; Stuart, R.L. Use of powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) by healthcare workers for preventing highly infectious viral diseases—A systematic review of evidence. Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Canelli, R.; Connor, C.W.; Gonzalez, M.; Nozari, A.; Ortega, R. Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1957–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. DeSerres, J.J.; Al-Shaqsi, S.Z.; Antonyshyn, O.M.; Fialkov, J.A. Best practice guidelines for the management of acute craniomaxillofacial trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2020. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282404/ (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  158. Song, G.; Liang, G.; Liu, W. Fungal co-infections associated with global COVID-19 pandemic: A clinical and diagnostic perspective from China. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Rabagliati, R.; Rodríguez, N.; Núñez, C.; Huete, A.; Bravo, S.; Garcia, P. COVID-19–Associated Mold Infection in Critically Ill Patients, Chile. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1454–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Waizel-Haiat, S.; Guerrero-Paz, J.A.; Sanchez-Hurtado, L.; Calleja-Alarcon, S.; Romero-Gutierrez, L. A case of fatal rhino-orbital mucormycosis associated with new onset diabetic ketoacidosis and COVID-19. Cureus 2021, 13, e13163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  161. Saldanha, M.; Reddy, R.; Vincent, M.J. Paranasal Mucormycosis in COVID-19 Patient. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 22, 1–4. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12070-021-02574-0 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
  162. Mekonnen, Z.K.; Ashraf, D.C.; Jankowski, T.; Grob, S.R.; Vagefi, M.R.; Kersten, R.C.; Simko, J.P.; Winn, B.J. Acute invasive rhino-orbital mucormycosis in a patient with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 37, e40–e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 life cycle showing virus behaviour inside the body [21].
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 life cycle showing virus behaviour inside the body [21].
Ijerph 18 11008 g001
Figure 2. COVID-19 pathophysiology demonstrating disease progression from virus entrance in the body to causing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [21].
Figure 2. COVID-19 pathophysiology demonstrating disease progression from virus entrance in the body to causing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [21].
Ijerph 18 11008 g002
Figure 3. Showing exhalation distances of aerosols and droplets (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 3. Showing exhalation distances of aerosols and droplets (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Ijerph 18 11008 g003
Figure 4. Macroglossia with lateral indentations (left) geographic tongue (right) (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 4. Macroglossia with lateral indentations (left) geographic tongue (right) (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Ijerph 18 11008 g004
Figure 5. SARS-CoV-2 mechanism of oral manifestations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 5. SARS-CoV-2 mechanism of oral manifestations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Ijerph 18 11008 g005
Figure 6. Economic impact of COVID-19 on dental practices [95].
Figure 6. Economic impact of COVID-19 on dental practices [95].
Ijerph 18 11008 g006
Figure 7. Aerosol-generating dental procedures and associated factors [135].
Figure 7. Aerosol-generating dental procedures and associated factors [135].
Ijerph 18 11008 g007
Table 1. Signs and symptoms of COVID-19.
Table 1. Signs and symptoms of COVID-19.
Most CommonLess CommonMost Dangerous
Pyrexia
Fatigue
Dry cough
Anosmia and ageusia [22,23]
Headache [24]
Sore throat
Diarrhoea
Conjunctivitis
Skin rash
Fingers and toes discoloration
Dyspnoea
Chest pain/pressure
Loss of movement/speech
Heart attack
Epilepsy [24]
Blood coagulation [25]
Cerebral infarction [26]
Kidney failure
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure because of cytokine storm
Table 2. Showing relationship of COVID-19 with various comorbid conditions [29].
Table 2. Showing relationship of COVID-19 with various comorbid conditions [29].
  • Hypertension (55.4%)
  • Diabetes (37.3%)
  • Hyperlipidaemia (18.5%)
  • Coronary artery disease (12.4%)
  • Renal disease (11%)
  • Dementia (9.1%)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.3%)
  • Cancer (8.1%)
  • Atrial fibrillation (7.1%)
  • Heart failure (7.1%)
Table 3. Incubation period and onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier.
Table 3. Incubation period and onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 2021 Copyright Elsevier.
Clinical FeaturesPopulation Experiencing (%)
1 to 3 day(s)
Onset of symptoms
  • Fever generally appears on the first day
  • Cough, sore throat may appear by 3 days
80% of patients get these mild symptoms
4 to 9 days
In the lungs
  • The virus may reach lungs between 3 to 4 days
  • Difficult breathing may start by 4 to 9 days
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome due to lungs inflammation between 18 to 25 days
14% of those infected experience these severe symptoms
8 to 15 days
In the blood
  • From the lungs, the infection may enter the blood
  • By the end of 1 week, sepsis may develop
5% of those infected need admissions to an intensive care unit
Table 4. Commonly used drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.
Table 4. Commonly used drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.
Name of DrugPotential Role in COVID-19Problems/Issues/Remarks
β-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) [54]Ribonucleoside analogue with broad-spectrum antiviral activity (oral route)
Effective against Remdesivir-resistant virus, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and SARS-CoV in primary HAE cell cultures
Reduces virus titres in a dose-dependent manner
Coronavirus may achieve 2-fold resistance after 30 passages [55].
Interferons (IFN-I and III) [56]Produces innate immune response in human cells and stimulates IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) through JAK/STAT pathway, affecting viral replication at all stages of its replicative cycle.
Early administration can decrease the viral spread and can produce extended-lasting responses without inflammatory side effects.
Virus adapts to IFNs by turning over interferon receptors, leading to a diminished response by helper T cells and NK cells.
IFNs can produce flu-like symptoms on their own [57,58].
Chloroquine (CQ), Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) [56]Inhibits intracellular replication of viral particles.
It prevents the interaction between the virus and its receptor, thus blocking its effect.
Both drugs are immunomodulatory and downregulate Toll-like receptors, thus suppressing the cytokine storm.
HCQ is a less toxic derivative of CQ; hence it is favoured in the treatment of COVID-19. Both these drugs produce reactive oxygen species, which can damage host cells.
Azithromycin (AZM) [56,59,60]Inhibits replication of virus in bronchial cells by decreasing the synthesis of adhesion molecules like ICAM-1.
Downregulates cytokine production (IL2, 6, 8), maintains alveolar cell integrity and reduces lung fibrosis
Acts synergistically with HCQ in reducing viral load
It also prevents bacterial co-infection by Prevotella, which can enhance the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 by internalizing it.
It can cause gastrointestinal upset, nausea, headache, hepatotoxicity, and bacterial resistance.
It can prolong QTc interval, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden cardiac arrest by causing intracellular sodium overdose.
Tocilizumab [61,62]Recombinant humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, which is a competitive blocker of membrane-bound and soluble IL-6.
Potential role in patients presenting with symptoms associated with cytokine storm.
Compochiaro et al. found no statistically significant survival benefit with a slightly increased propensity towards the development of fungal infections; however, it may reduce the need for ventilatory support in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [63].
Steroids [64,65,66]Usually administered steroids include methylprednisolone (32 mg/day), dexamethasone (6 mg/day), and hydrocortisone. Dexamethasone is favoured as it causes minimal fluid retention.
It may have a role in reducing the tissue injury due to cytokine storm.
Conflicting body of evidence regarding improvement in survival and decreased hospital stay. May be beneficial but should not be given to all the patients.
It can lead towards the development of hyperglycaemia, hypernatremia and mucormycosis and aspergillosis.
It can reduce the duration of fever but has no overall effect on the duration of hospitalization.
Remdesvir [67,68]Broad-spectrum antiviral which is an inhibitor of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymeraseConflicting data on improvement in symptoms with no significant impact on mortality, however, may offer a survival benefit if given early in mild to moderately ill COVID-19 patients.
VitaminsA high dose of vitamin C can prevent cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients, which reduces lung injury and inflammatory damage.
Table 5. Sources, respective companies, and approval status of various COVID-19 vaccines.
Table 5. Sources, respective companies, and approval status of various COVID-19 vaccines.
CompanyTypeDosesRouteEfficacyStorageApproval/DevelopmentMechanism of Action
Pfizer–BioNTechNucleoside modified mRNA (BNT162a1 and BNT162b2)2 shots
21 days apart
I.M inj.95%−70 °CUK approvedSpike proteins and RBD fragments are introduced into the body producing the desired immune response [71].
Oxford–AstraZenecaViral vector (genetically altered nonreplicating chimpanzee adenovirus)2 shots
4 to 12 weeks apart
I.M inj.70%Regular fridge temperatureUK approvedSpecifically deliver genes to the target cells thus providing a trigger to cytotoxic T-cells resulting in killing of infected cells [69].
ModernaBased on lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA2 shots
28 days apart
I.M inj.94.1%−20 °CUK approvedEncodes stable form of spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and educates CD4+ immune cells of the body [72].
Novavax (NVX-CoV2373)Full-length S (spike) Protein-based2I.M inj. Regular fridge temperaturePendingPromotes migration of leukocytes into lymph nodes thus increasing T-cell, B-cell, and NK cell response [69].
Janssen (Johnson & Johnson’s)Viral vector based using adenovirus or pox virus1I.M inj.66.3%Regular fridge temperaturePendingDNA of the adenovirus is modified which helps the body to develop humoral and T-cell based cellular immune response against COVID-19 [73].
CoronaVac (Sinopharm/Sinovac) (BBIBP-CorV)Inactivated virus vaccine I.M inj.79%Regular fridge temperatureApproved by China, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and PakistanContains virus has been inactivated through UV light/chemicals and elicits antigen-specific antibody response producing plasma cells, T-cells, and memory B-cells [74].
CanSino Bioloics (Ad5-nCoV) ConvideciaNon-replicating adenovirus based vaccine1I.M inj.66% to 91%Regular fridge temperatureApproved by Hungary, China, Mexico, and PakistanRBD and spike proteins produce T cell response conferring immunity against virus [69].
Sputnik VUsing two non-replicating adenovirus based vector (Ad26, Ad5)2 doses 21 days apart Undergoing phase 3 trials Gamaleya Institute, Moscow.Dose 1 injects Ad26, and in dose 2 Ad5 is given. This produces an enhanced immune response [69].
KBP-201 (NCT04473690)Protein (RBD-based) subunit vaccine2 doses 21 days apartI.M inj.Currently undergoing phase II trials-PendingRBD in the spike protein binds to ACE-2 receptor producing neutralizing monoclonal antibodies towards SARS-CoV-2 [75].
CovaxinInactivated virus vaccine Currently undergoing trials in IndiaSame as mentioned above under CoronaVac (sinopharm)
BHPIV3/SARS-SLive attenuated virus vaccine1I.M. InjCurrently undergoing phase 2 animal trials Currently undergoing trials in India and ChinaInduces production of SARS-CoV neutralizing serum antibodies [69].
DelNS1-SARS-CoV2-RBDLive attenuated vaccine with deletion of NS1 influenza strain1Intra-nasalCurrently undergoing phase 2 animal trials Modified to include SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is considered more immunogenic than other LAVs [69].
LUNAR-COV19Lipid enabled and unlocked nucleomonomer agent-modified RNA (LUNAR)1 Currently undergoing phase 1 and 2 trials Biospace, SingaporeEntry into host cells and mRNA is translated into protiein, s leading to the production of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 [69].
I.M inj. (Intramuscular injection).
Table 6. Prevention and control of COVID-19 during dental healthcare.
Table 6. Prevention and control of COVID-19 during dental healthcare.
1—Teledentistry and Triage Protocols
(a)
Teledentistry involves using the telephone, SMS, WhatsApp, Skype, Facebook Messenger, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or emails [108].
(b)
Ascertain identity and medical history of the patients along with confirmation of COVID status.
(c)
Focus on providing appropriate advice, analgesics, and antimicrobials (the three A’s) [109].
(d)
Determine the urgency of treatment and defer non-emergency treatment.
(e)
Limit the number of visitors accompanying the patient.
(f)
Patients and visitors should wear masks [110].
2—Screening Zone
(a)
Provide face masks and monitor temperature, preferably with a contact-free thermometer.
(b)
Cough etiquette and hand hygiene instructions.
(c)
Sanitizers (ABHR) with at least 60% alcohol.
(d)
If the patient is in emergency conditions for COVID-19, refer him/her to a medical facility and avoid all sorts of dental treatment in a confirmed positive case [111].
3—Waiting Area
(a)
The waiting area should be well ventilated, and chairs should be at least 2 m apart.
(b)
Remove frequently touched objects (magazines, etc.).
(c)
Hand sanitizer should be available.
(d)
Schedule appointments to minimize patient load [112,113].
4—Donning ZoneClean area PPE wearing sequence including the hand disinfection:
  • Put on gloves in case of double gloving.
  • Wearing covers of shoe, gown, mask/respirator, eye protection and head cap.
  • Perform hand disinfection [114].
5—Doffing ZoneDirty area PPE removing sequence:
  • Remove outer gloves in case double gloving, shoes cover, head cap, gown, inner gloves.
  • Perform hand hygiene (for at least 20 s, use ABHR with alcohol (60%) or wash hands with soap).
  • Remove eye wear and mask/respirator [115].
6—Dental Surgery Room for Aerosol Generating Procedures
  • A closed room.
  • Patients should wear a gown and protective eyewear.
  • Furniture and other non-essential items should be removed.
  • All materials, instruments, paper records, etc., should be outside the surgery.
  • During aerosol procedures, 1 or 2 small openings into the dental surgery, for air inflow, and passing of materials into the surgery.
  • Door should possess a self-closing device [116].
7—Procedure Infection Control
  • Adequate ventilation [117]
  • Masks favoured for dental procedures with aerosol generation are FFP2/N95, FFP3/N95, and NI00 [101].
  • Valved expirators filter the entering air but releases the unfiltered expired air. Thus, they must be covered with a surgical mask [97,118].
  • Non-valved expirators are favoured more because they filter both inspired and expired air.
  • Rubber dam isolation.
  • Aseptically set up the instrument tray and the required materials before the procedure.
  • Apply protective barriers.
  • Preprocedural rinse with mouth wash containing 1% hydrogen peroxide for 1 min or 0.2% povidone-iodine for 30 s or chlorhexidine gluconate may reduce the microbial contamination.
  • HV suction with an 8 mm wide suction tip should be held 6–15 mm from an aerosol producing device [119].
  • Ideally high-speed rotary instruments and handpieces must be avoided. If necessary to use, such instruments must be fitted with anti-retraction system [118].
8—Dental Surgery Disinfection
  • Procedure must be scheduled at the end of day.
  • The clinic must not be accessed for at least 180 min following the procedure.
  • The waste produced by the patient’s treatment with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 is comprehended to be infectious; therefore, yellow coloured double-layer clinical waste bags and “gooseneck” ligation should be used.
  • On the next day or after at least after 180 min, the entire dental surgery should be disinfected meticulously [120].
9—Dental Surgery Ventilation
a
In-line exhausts with ducts.
b
Through the wall exhausts.
c
HVAC systems with HEPA filters can be used for disinfection.
The dental clinic might be converted to a negative pressure room, with >12 air changes an hour [116].
10—Dental Equipment MaintenanceFollow the guidelines of IFU for the maintenance of dental unit water-lines, autoclave, compressors, radiography equipment, and suctions [116].
Table 7. Various emergency and non-emergency dental procedures according to COVID-19 guidelines [125].
Table 7. Various emergency and non-emergency dental procedures according to COVID-19 guidelines [125].
Dental Non-Emergency ProceduresDental Emergency Procedures
New/periodic oral examinationsUncontrolled bleeding
Routine x-raysCellulitis/bacterial facial space infection
Routine dental cleaning as well as preventive therapiesSevere dental pain (pulpitis)
Extraction of asymptomatic teethPericoronitis/3rd molar pain
Restorative dental procedures (fillings, crowning)Dry socket
Recall/revisitTooth fracture
Dento-alveolar trauma
Painful broken filling
Adjustment of ortho-wire damaging gums
Post-surgery treatment
Table 8. Aerosol-generating medical procedures [132,133,134].
Table 8. Aerosol-generating medical procedures [132,133,134].
1. Tracheostomy and tracheal intubation procedures2. Positive-pressure mechanical ventilation and CPAP
3. Bronchoscopy4. Intubation and extubation procedures
5. Surgery, autopsy, or post-mortem procedures with high-speed devices6. High frequency oscillatory ventilation
7. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation8. High-flow oxygen therapy
9. Sputum induction10. Airway suctioning
11. FEES and VFSS12. Nebulized or aerosol therapy
CPAP (Continuous positive airway pressure); FEES (Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing); VFSS (Video fluoroscopic swallowing study)
Table 9. Showing different types of aerosols and droplets and their significance [141].
Table 9. Showing different types of aerosols and droplets and their significance [141].
Droplet TypeDescription
Splatter dropletsParticle size ≥ 50 µm, briefly airborne, and spread by close contact (typically within 1 m) with the host.
AerosolsParticle size < 50 µm, carry viable pathogens, remain airborne for prolonged period, and spread to distant surfaces.
Droplets > 5 µmRemain in the upper respiratory tract.
Droplets ≤ 5 µmMight be inhaled into the lower respiratory tract.
Droplets ≤ 1 µmCan enter alveoli.
Table 10. Protocols for maxillofacial procedures during COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 10. Protocols for maxillofacial procedures during COVID-19 pandemic.
Pre-Procedure ProtocolsDuring Procedure ProtocolsPost-Procedure Protocols
  • Medical and dental history, physical examination, and auxiliary tests should be conducted.
  • Povidone (0.2%) or hydrogen peroxide (1%) containing mouthwashes efficiently lowers the droplets and aerosols number formed throughout oral operations [9,146,147,148].
  • PPE: eye protection, masks (N95 or FFP2), surgical gloves, and fluid-resistant gown.
  • Limit the instruments and materials used during the procedure [149].
  • Surgical procedures of positive patients should be carried out in a negative pressure room [150]. However, COVID-19 negative patients can be in non-negative pressure rooms [151].
  • Use of PAPR is strongly recommended [152,153,154]. Allocated protection factor for PAPR is 25–100, while for N95 it is 10 [155].
  • All staff except the anaesthesia team should remain outside the operating room 10 min following intubation and extubation [156].
  • Allocate patients in separate rooms.
  • Periodic control of hypertension, temperature, oxygen saturation, and heart rate. Monitoring devices should be different for each patient.
  • Medical treatment decreasing the use of glucocorticoids.
  • Early patient mobilization to reduce hospitalization [143].
personal protective equipment (PPE); powered air purifying respirator (PAPR)
Table 11. International guidelines for management of cranio-maxillo-facial trauma [157].
Table 11. International guidelines for management of cranio-maxillo-facial trauma [157].
Urgency for operationEmergent (require surgical intervention in ≤24 h)Urgent (require surgical intervention for bone union)
Patient presentationCompromised airway or vision, uncontrolled bleeding, or combined intracranial or upper facial fractureFacial fracture causing functional or cosmetic deformity including displaced cranio-orbital fractures, orbital dystopia, and naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures
COVID-19 screeningRT-PCR or rapid COVID testRT-PCR or rapid COVID-19 test
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Butt, R.T.; Janjua, O.S.; Qureshi, S.M.; Shaikh, M.S.; Guerrero-Gironés, J.; Rodríguez-Lozano, F.J.; Zafar, M.S. Dental Healthcare Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111008

AMA Style

Butt RT, Janjua OS, Qureshi SM, Shaikh MS, Guerrero-Gironés J, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Zafar MS. Dental Healthcare Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(21):11008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Butt, Rabia Tariq, Omer Sefvan Janjua, Sana Mehmood Qureshi, Muhammad Saad Shaikh, Julia Guerrero-Gironés, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lozano, and Muhammad Sohail Zafar. 2021. "Dental Healthcare Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 21: 11008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111008

APA Style

Butt, R. T., Janjua, O. S., Qureshi, S. M., Shaikh, M. S., Guerrero-Gironés, J., Rodríguez-Lozano, F. J., & Zafar, M. S. (2021). Dental Healthcare Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop