Next Article in Journal
From Self-Doubt to Pride: Understanding the Empowering Effects of Delivering School-Based Wellness Programmes for Emerging Adult Facilitators—A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Social Undermining and Interpersonal Rumination among Employees: The Mediating Role of Being the Subject of Envy and the Moderating Role of Social Support
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fe-Mn Oxide Modified Biochar for Pb(II) in Wastewater

1
College of Environment Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Hunan Engineering Laboratory for Control of Rice Quality and Safety, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(14), 8420; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148420
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 10 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)

Abstract

:
This study prepared iron-manganese oxide-modified biochar (FM-BC) by impregnating rice straw biochar (BC) with a mixed solution of ferric nitrate and potassium permanganate. The effects of pH, FM-BC dosage, interference of coexisting ions, adsorption time, incipient Pb(II) concentration, and temperature on the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC were investigated. Moreover, the Pb(II) adsorption mechanism of FM-BC was analyzed using a series of characterization techniques. The results showed that the Fe-Mn oxide composite modification significantly promoted the physical and chemical functions of the biochar surface and the adsorption capacity of Pb(II). The specific surface area of FM-BC was 18.20 times larger than that of BC, and the maximum Pb(II) adsorption capacity reached 165.88 mg/g. Adsorption kinetic tests showed that the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC was based on the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, which indicated that the adsorption process was mainly governed by chemical adsorption. The isothermal adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC conformed to the Langmuir model, indicating that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic. Characterization analyses (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) showed that the adsorption mechanism of Pb(II) by FM-BC was mainly via electrostatic adsorption, chemical precipitation, complexation, ion exchange, and the transformation of Mn2O3 into MnO2. Therefore, FM-BC is a promising adsorbent for Pb(II) removal from wastewater.

1. Introduction

Lead (Pb) is a non-biodegradable, toxic element that bioaccumulates in the environment [1]. The mining and smelting, paint and coating, electroplating, and chemical industries are the main sources of Pb in aquatic environments [2]. Pb-polluted water presents a great danger to the ecological environment and threatens human health through the food chain [3,4]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to treat wastewater containing Pb and reduce the discharge of Pb into the environment in a high-efficiency, low-carbon, and environmentally friendly manner.
Recently, ion exchange [5], chemical precipitation [6], electrocoagulation [7], and adsorption [8] have been used to remove heavy metals from wastewater. Among these, adsorption is widely used because of its advantages of simple operation, high efficiency, and environmental friendliness, especially in the deep treatment of heavy metals in wastewater [9]. Biochar has a complex void structure, surface oxygen-containing functional group, and a large specific surface area [10,11], and is considered to be a valuable adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater [12,13]. Biochar has a wide range of raw materials, such as rice straw [14], rapeseed stem [15] and corn straw [16], which are agricultural by-products. Rapid pyrolysis technology is a common method of preparing biochar from agricultural waste. Raw materials can be pyrolyzed under anoxic and at a temperature range of 300–1000 °C conditions to obtain raw biochar [17,18]. However, the surface of biochar has many negative charges and a low content of functional groups and its adsorption capacity for heavy metals is limited [19]. Researchers have enhanced the adsorption performance of biochar by UV radiation modification, acid-base modification, functional group loading, and other modification methods. Studies have shown that the modification of biochar with metal or metal oxides can significantly boost the specific surface area and microporous pore size, boost the load amount of functional groups, such as hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, and significantly improve the adsorption performance of biochar [20]. Fe and Mn oxides can accelerate electron transfer and improve the oxidation process and have been widely used for the surface modification of raw materials [17]. Fe oxide has a significant specific surface area, strong affinity, and a tendency toward Pb(II) [21]. Wang et al. discovered that the maximum adsorption capacity of Fe3O4 modified biochar for Pb(II) was 110 mg/g, compared to 77.5 mg/g for the original biochar. Zhao et al. indicated that hematite-modified biochar had an outstanding adsorption capacity for Pb(II) in water, which was 41.75% higher than the unmodified biochar. Mn oxide has strong oxidation characteristics, excellent adsorption performance, and can form stable complexes with Pb(II) [22,23]. Faheem et al. [24] found that when the coverage of manganese oxide on rice husk biochar was 40%, the specific surface area of the modified manganese oxide biochar was 1.45 times larger than that of the original biochar and the maximum adsorption capacity for Pb(II) was 86.5 mg/g. Wang et al. showed that the strong interaction between birnessite particles and Pb(II) could strengthen the adsorption process and that the removal effect of manganese oxide-loaded biochar on Pb(II) in water (47.05 mg/g) was better than that of the original biochar (2.35 mg/g).
There is a synergistic effect between Fe and Mn metal oxides and the combination of Fe and Mn oxide modification can significantly improve the adsorption performance of biochar compared to the single-oxide modification [25]. Therefore, we believe that the Fe and Mn oxide composite-modified materials have a better adsorption capacity for Pb(II) in wastewater. However, little research has been conducted on the adsorption features and mechanism of Pb(II) in water by the combined modification of biochar with Fe and Mn oxides. In this study, rice straw biochar (BC) was used as the raw material and Fe-Mn oxide biochar (FM-BC) was prepared by impregnating it with a combination of Fe and Mn oxides. The major objectives of the present study were: (1) to study the adsorption performance and adsorption characteristics of FM-BC for Pb(II) in wastewater; (2) to investigate the influences of pH, addition dosage, coexisting ions, adsorption time, incipient concentration, and temperature on the Pb(II) adsorption capacities of FM-BC; (3) to explore the adsorption mechanism of Pb(II) in wastewater by FM-BC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. FM-BC Preparation

Rice straw was obtained from a paddy field in Liuyang City, Hunan Province (China), and was washed and dried in an electrothermal blowing drying oven (101-1AB, Tianjin Taiste, Tianjin, CHN) to a constant weight before being crushed by a 100-mesh sieve to make straw powder. The straw powder was heated in an anaerobic environment at 300 °C for 4 h to form biochar. Then, the biochar was cooled down to room temperature, washed with deionized water, and desiccated at 70 °C to obtain the original biochar of straw (BC).
We prepared biochars with nine different molar ratios of Fe/Mn and, through a pre-test, selected the Fe-Mn oxide biochar with the strongest adsorption capacity for Pb(II), Fe:Mn = 2:5. The composite modification of BC with Fe-Mn oxides was conducted by the impregnation method, and BC (5.0 g) was weighed and infiltrated into a mixed solution of 40 mL of 0.10 mol/L Fe(NO3)3 and 40 mL of 0.25 mol/L KMnO4. The mixture was stirred in a magnetic stirrer for 2 h, then placed in a water bath at 95 °C for 22 h, dried, and subjected to anaerobic pyrolysis at 300 °C for 0.5 h. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature, washed with deionized water, and dried in a dryer at 70 °C to a constant weight to obtain Fe-Mn oxide biochar (FM-BC).

2.2. Adsorption Experiments

These experiments examined the impact of pH (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0), FM-BC dosage (0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 g/L), single coexisting cations (Ca(II), Mg(II), Cu(II),and Zn(II)), adsorption time (0–720 min), incipient Pb(II) concentration (50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/L), and reaction temperature (288, 298, 308 and 318 K) on the FM-BC adsorption performance for Pb(II). In addition, the regeneration ability of FM-BC was also studied. The supernatant was filtered through a microporous membrane (0.45 μm) and stored in plastic polyethylene bottles for testing. All treatments were repeated three times. The adsorption process scheme is detailed in the Supplementary Material.

2.3. Characterization Analysis Method

Samples of BC, FM-BC, and FM-BC after adsorption (FM-BC-Pb) were characterized and analyzed. The microstructure and surface properties of the samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SIGMA 300, Oberkohen, GER) and the specific surface area of the samples was analyzed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method (BET) with automatic specific surface area analyzer (ASAP 2020 HD88, AUTOSORB IQ, Atlanta, GA, USA). The chemical composition and valence state of elements were examined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, Waltham, MA, USA) and the functional group structures of the samples were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo IN10, Waltham, MA, USA) in the absorption mode of 4000–400 cm−1.

2.4. Sample Analysis Method and Quality Control

The Pb(II) content in the filtrate was examined using ICP-AES (Thermo Fisher, ICAP-6300, Portland, OR, USA). The detection limit for Pb was 0.020 mg/L. The standard addition recovery method was used for quality control, and the recovery rate of Pb was 99.6–104.0%.

2.5. Data and Statistics Analysis

Pb(II) removal rate and adsorption capacity by FM-BC were evaluated, and the adsorption kinetics were investigated using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics. To assess the isothermal adsorption of the experimental data and explore the adsorption thermodynamics, the Langmuir and Freundlich equations were utilized. Detailed data processing is described in the Supplementary Materials. The data were processed and analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel and SPSS statistics V22, analyzed using the “post hoc” Duncan test (p < 0.05) and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) univariate, and mapped with OriginPro 2019b.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Peculiarities of the Adsorbent Structure

3.1.1. SEM and BET Analysis

The morphological characteristics and microstructures of BC, FM-BC, and FM-BC-Pb are displayed in Figure 1. The pore structure of BC was small and with few pores, and its surface was relatively smooth (Figure 1a). The modified FM-BC had pores all over the biochar surface with a larger pore structure, and more pores and spherical Fe-Mn binary oxide fine particles were attached to the surface. Furthermore, the elemental peaks of Mn and Fe in the EDS elemental analysis increased, confirming that Mn and Fe were effectively loaded onto the BC surface (Figure 1b). Moreover, the nanoparticles of metal (Ca(II), K(I)) produced during pyrolysis were also visible from the FM-BC surface, which was more favorable for ion exchange between FM-BC and Pb(II) [26]. Following the Pb(II) adsorption, the surface and pores of FM-BC were filled with a large number of granular Pb compounds (Figure 1c), indicating that FM-BC could efficiently adsorb Pb(II). As shown in Table 1, compared to BC, the specific surface area of FM-BC (13.726 m2/g) was 18.20 times higher, and the total pore volume was 15.00 times higher. This might be due to pyrolysis promoting the thermochemical decomposition of biomass and changing the pore structure. Fe-Mn oxide affected the pore structure of BC and optimized the surface properties of the biochar [27], which was beneficial for the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC in wastewater. After Pb(II) adsorption, the specific surface area of FM-BC reached 26.434 m2/g. A large amount of Pb(II) was adsorbed and attached to the FM-BC surface and pores, which increased the specific surface area but reduced the average pore size (Table 1). In addition, the external surface area, micropore-specific surface area, and micropore volume of FM-BC were significantly higher (30.45, 6.34 and 8.00 times, respectively), than those of BC. This shows that the adsorption size of FM-BC increased, making it superior for the Pb(II) adsorption.

3.1.2. XPS Analysis

The adsorption process of Pb by FM-BC was further investigated using XPS. As may be seen in Figure 2a, the major XPS peaks of FM-BC mainly included Fe 2p (711 eV), Mn 2p (642 eV), O 1s (530 eV), C 1s (286 eV), and Pb 4f (139 eV) peaks. The C 1s peak (Figure 2b) are divided into three peaks: C-C/C=C (284.7 eV), C-O-C (285.7 eV), and O-C=O (289.0 eV). C-C/C=C accounted for the largest proportion of BC and FM-BC-Pb (50.63% and 50.21%, respectively), and C-O-C accounted for the largest proportion of FM-BC (48.28%). This indicates that the C-C/C=C bond of biochar is oxidized by Fe-Mn oxide and then forms more C-O-C and O-C=O oxygen-containing functional groups with excellent properties [28], which is more conducive to the complexation of FM-BC with Pb(II). The Fe 2p spectrum (Figure 2c) showed that the three peaks with binding energies of 711.0, 713.1, and 714.8 eV belong to Fe2O3, FeOOH, and Fe(III), respectively. Fe2O3 accounted for the main proportion of both FM-BC and FM-BC-Pb, but its percentage decreased from 48.60% in FM-BC to 45.67% in FM-BC-Pb. The proportion of Fe(III) also decreased slightly, whereas the percentage of FeOOH increased (from 34.95% to 43.70%). The characteristic peak of Fe 2p had no obvious displacement, signifying that the Fe valence is fixed and does not change after the Pb(II) adsorption [22]. The Mn2p spectrum (Figure 2d) showed that the three peaks with binding energies of 641.2, 642.0, and 643.5 eV belong to MnO, Mn2O3, and MnO2, respectively. Following the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC, the proportion of Mn2O3 decreased from 63.43% to 34.18%, whereas the proportion of MnO2 increased from 23.76% to 42.38%, indicating that Mn2O3 participated in the adsorption process and Mn(III) underwent oxidation to form Mn(IV).
An obvious Pb 4f peak appeared in the XPS spectrum of FM-BC-Pb (Figure 2e). The characteristic peaks of Pb(OH)2, PbCO3, and Pb(NO3)2 appeared at 138.7, 139.0 and 139.2 eV, respectively, of which PbCO3 accounted for the main proportion (40.02%). The proportion of Pb(NO3)2 accounted for 35.51%, which may have been caused by the FM-BC remaining on the material surface after adsorbing the solution with Pb(NO3)2 as a solute.

3.1.3. FTIR Analysis

The functional groups of BC, FM-BC, and FM-BC-Pb were tested using FTIR (Figure 3). The wide peak of FM-BC at 3434 cm−1 was caused by the tensile and oscillation peaks of the -OH group of alcohol or phenol [29], that at 2922 cm−1 was prompted by the deformation oscillation of -CH2, that at 1625 cm−1 was prompted by the tensile oscillation of C=C, -C=O, those at 1385 and 1072 cm−1 were the absorption peaks of carboxyl O=C-O and C-O-C of cellulose [30], and that at 554 cm−1 was the absorption peaks of Fe-O and Mn-O [31]. The results showed that Fe-Mn oxide was effectively loaded on the biochar surface, which was consistent with the XPS results. FM-BC contained a variety of oxygen-containing functional groups, which are conducive to the Pb(II) adsorption.

3.2. Impacts of pH, Addition Dosage and Coexisting Ions on Pb(II) Adsorption by FM-BC

3.2.1. The Effect of pH on the Adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC

Figure 4 showed that the Pb(II) adsorption capacity and removal rate in water by FM-BC were influenced by the pH of the aqueous solution. At pH 2.0, the FM-BC for the adsorption capacity was only 5.99 mg/g and the adsorption effect was the lowest. The reason was that the surface of FM-BC was positively charged and the electrostatic repulsive force limited the adsorption of Pb(II) in acidic environments [32] and accelerated the desorption rate of Pb(II) in the FM-BC [33]. When the solution’s pH value increased from 2.0 to 5.0, the reduction rate of Pb(II) increased rapidly from 6.33% to 95.20% and the adsorption capacity rose from 5.99 to 94.30 mg/g. The main reason was that H+ in the aqueous solution decreased significantly with the increasing pH; moreover, FM-BC had a large number of negative charges on the surface, which was beneficial for the adsorption of Pb(II) cations. When the pH of the aqueous solution was changed from 5.0 to 6.0, the contents of OH- and CO32- in the solution increased and OH- and Pb(II) formed Pb(OH)2 and Pb(OH)+ [34], which reduced the positive charge of Pb and the content of free moving Pb(II), weakened the electrostatic attraction between FM-BC and Pb(II), and caused a minor drop in the adsorption capacity of Pb(II) by FM-BC (2.77 mg/g). It further confirmed that the Pb(II) adsorption could be related to hydrogen bonding and ion exchange [35].

3.2.2. The Effect of FM-BC Addition Dosage on Pb(II) Adsorption by FM-BC

The effects of different FM-BC addition dosages on Pb(II) adsorption in water can be seen in Figure 5. As the dosage of FM-BC increased from 0.5 to 8.0 g/L, the amount of Pb(II) adsorption gradually decreased, from 124.80–207.51 to 23.61–24.66 mg/g. However, the removal rate of Pb(II) increased from 31.50–52.38% to 95.34–99.59% (Figure S1). This is because the number of effective adsorption sites for Pb(II) in water increased with increasing FM-BC addition dosage. In contrast, the original content of Pb(II) in the solution was fixed (200 mg/L) and the molar amount of Pb(II) was constant, which resulted in the vacancy of some adsorption sites of FM-BC. As a result, FM-BC did not fully use all adsorption sites [36].

3.2.3. The Effect of Coexisting Ions on Pb(II) Adsorption by FM-BC

The effects of coexisting divalent metal ions (Ca(II), Mg(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II)) on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC were investigated to represent the coexistence of other metal ions in wastewater. Figure 6 showed that the order of the effect of the four coexisting ions on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC was Cu(II) > Zn(II) > Ca(II) > Mg(II). The presence of Ca(II), Mg(II), and Zn(II) had little effect on the removal of Pb(II) by FM-BC. When the contents of Ca(II), Mg(II), and Zn(II) increased from 10 to 200 mg/L, the adsorption potential of FM-BC for Pb(II) decreased by only 1.61–10.01%, 1.47–8.60%, and 2.12–12.67%, respectively, indicating that Pb(II) had stronger competitiveness for adsorption sites than these coexisting ions. In general, a higher electronegativity value for metal ions results in a stronger attractive force with FM-BC, and a smaller radius of hydrated ions for metal ions results in a greater affinity with FM-BC [37,38]. The electronegativity values of Ca(II), Mg(II), Zn(II), and Pb(II) are 1.00, 1.31, 1.65, and 2.33, respectively, and the radius of the hydrated ions are 4.12, 4.28, 4.30, and 4.01 Å, respectively [39,40,41]. Unlike these three metal ions, Pb(II) has a higher electronegativity and a smaller hydrated ion radius. Therefore, when Ca(II), Mg(II), and Zn(II) coexisted, FM-BC exhibited better selectivity for the adsorption of Pb(II). However, the coexistence of Cu(II) significantly repressed the adsorption of Pb(II); when Cu(II) was 200 mg/L, the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC was only 37.23 mg/g, decreased by 60.60%, and the adsorption amount of Cu(II) was 26.18 mg/g. This is because the electronegativity value of Cu(II) (1.90) was closer to that of Pb(II) (2.33) than those of Ca(II) (1.00), Mg(II) (1.31), and Zn(II) (1.65). Meanwhile, the hydrated ion radius of Cu(II) (4.19 Å) was similar to that of Pb(II) (4.01 Å) [39,40], and the hydrolysis constants of Pb(II) and Cu(II) were 7.7 [42]. According to ion exchange theory, the existence of Cu(II) had a great competitive impact on the Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC, but the Pb(II) adsorption capacity by FM-BC was better than that of Cu(II). Therefore, the Cu content should be reduced as much as possible when applying the FM-BC to adsorb Pb(II) from wastewater to avoid its influence on Pb adsorption efficiency.

3.3. Adsorption Characteristics of FM-BC on Pb(II) in Water

3.3.1. Adsorption Kinetics

The effects of initial content and adsorption time on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC are shown in Figure 7. FM-BC adsorbed Pb(II) faster and the maximum adsorption capacity could reach 68.25–99.66% of the equilibrium adsorption capacity when adsorbed for 5 min. This may be because the adsorption dynamic gradient between the FM-BC and Pb(II) solution interface was large and the adsorption locations on the surface of FM-BC were quickly filled with Pb(II). At low Pb(II) contents (50, 100 and 200 mg/L), the adsorption capacity curve of FM-BC for Pb(II) increased sharply with increasing adsorption time and reached equilibrium after 60 min. At this time, Pb(II) was completely adsorbed and the equilibrium adsorption capacities of FM-BC were 25.57, 50.47 and 94.55 mg/g for 50, 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively. Under the high content of Pb(II) (400 mg/L), the adsorption size curve of FM-BC for Pb(II) showed a slow upward trend with ascending adsorption time and did not reach equilibrium within 720 min. Pb(II) in the water body was not fully adsorbed, achieving a maximum adsorption size of 165.88 mg/g. This can be credited to the limited number of active adsorption locations on the surface of the FM-BC. With increasing Pb(II) content, the adsorption sites of FM-BC tended to saturate, which limited and slowed the adsorption [19].
According to the fitting data (Table S1), Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC conformed to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the R2 was between 0.998–0.999, which was significantly higher than that of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model (0.656–0.975) (Figure S2). The pseudo-second-order kinetic model showed that the equilibrium adsorption size of FM-BC for Pb(II) was 166.67 mg/g, which was closer to the experimental value of 165.88 mg/g. In this study, the equilibrium adsorption size of FM-BC for Pb(II) was 166.67 mg/g, much higher than that of BC (70.33 mg/g). Furthermore, the maximum adsorption size of FM-BC for Pb(II) was significantly higher than other adsorbents stated in the recent literature (Table 2).

3.3.2. Adsorption Isotherm

The adsorption isotherm of FM-BC for Pb(II) in water is displayed in Figure S3. The adsorption size of Pb(II) of FM-BC improved with increasing temperature (288–318 K). As the temperature amplified from 288 to 298 K, the increase in the adsorption size of FM-BC for Pb(II) was the largest and then slightly improved with further increase to 318 K. This showed that the adsorption process of FM-BC on Pb(II) was endothermic and the adsorption size of FM-BC on Pb(II) reached saturation at 298 K. The Freundlich and Langmuir models were utilized to fit the Pb(II) adsorption process by FM-BC (Table S2). The outcomes disclosed that the adsorption process of FM-BC on Pb(II) was in harmony with the Langmuir model more than with the Freundlich model, with an R2 between 0.996–0.999. The adsorption process of Pb(II) on FM-BC was speculated to be monolayer adsorption. At 288, 298, 308 and 318 K, the largest adsorption capacities of FM-BC calculated by the Langmuir model were 135.14, 147.06, 149.25, and 151.52 mg/g, respectively. At 298 K (room temperature), the adsorption capacities of Pb(II) by magnetic pine bark waste biochar and sludge ash in a past study were 29.699 and 25.0 mg/g, respectively, obviously inferior to that of FM-BC prepared in this study [47,48]. Therefore, FM-BC exhibits a stronger adsorption performance for Pb(II) than other materials. At the four different temperatures, the RL of FM-BC for Pb(II) adsorption was between 0–1, indicating that FM-BC was favorable for Pb(II) adsorption. These results indicated that the higher the temperature was, the closer the RL value was to 0 and the stronger the Pb(II) adsorption size of FM-BC. In conclusion, the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC was monolayer, uniform, and heterogeneous.

3.3.3. Adsorption Thermodynamics

To determine the spontaneity of the adsorption process, adsorption experiments of Pb(II) by FM-BC were carried out at four separate temperatures (288, 298, 308 and 318 K) and thermodynamic parameters were calculated (Table S3). With increasing temperature, the ΔGθ value of FM-BC decreased from −7.91 to −12.07 kJ/mol. ΔGθ was negative, which indicated that the process of adsorption was spontaneous; the greater the temperature, the more conducive the FM-BC adsorption of Pb(II) and the stronger the spontaneity of the adsorption process. When ΔHθ > 0, it was further confirmed that Pb(II) absorbed by FM-BC was an endothermic process. ΔSθ > 0 showed that the disorder and randomness of molecules at the solid–liquid interface were amplified in the FM-BC adsorbing of Pb(II) and the ΔSθ value of FM-BC was 0.14 kJ/(mol·K) [49].

3.4. Adsorption Mechanism of Pb(II) by FM-BC

According to the XPS analysis (Figure 2), PbCO3 accounted for the main proportion, which indicated that chemical precipitation and complexation mainly occurred during the Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC. The high content of Pb(NO3)2 indicated that physical adsorption was included in the sorption process. Moreover, a decrease in potassium ions in the EDX analysis (Figure 1) may indicate that potassium salts have washed out of the surface or pores and depending on the anions, Pb(II) probably formed more insoluble salt PbCO3.
According to the FTIR analysis (Figure 3), once the FM-BC adsorbed Pb(II), the intensities of the -OH, O=C-O, and C=C peaks of alcohols or phenols decreased, indicating that O=C-O, -OH, and C=C bonds might be involved in the adsorption process. The complexation of Pb(II) with ionized oxygen functional groups (-OH or -COO) or C=C (π-electron) bonds form a complex of Pb-O and COO-Pb [50]. In addition to that, Pb(II) can be adsorbed through an ion-exchange mechanism. as shown in the following equations [35]:
2(R-COH) + Pb2+ → (R-CO)2Pb + 2H+.
2R-COOH + Pb2+ → (R-COO)2Pb + 2H+.
According to the findings of adsorption kinetics (Figure 7) and adsorption thermodynamics (Table S3), the pseudo-second-order kinetic model displayed a more accurate description of the adsorption characteristics for Pb(II) on FM-BC, which indicated that the adsorption of Pb(II) on FM-BC was mainly governed by chemical adsorption [51]. In general, chemisorption was dominant when ΔHθ was between 20–200 kJ/mol [52]. ΔHθ of FM-BC was 32.15 kJ/mol, which indicated that chemical adsorption was the main adsorption process, agreeing with the pseudo-second-order kinetic fitting results.

4. Conclusions

FM-BC prepared by the composite modification of Fe and Mn oxides optimized the physical and chemical properties of the biochar surface. The specific surface area of FM-BC was 18.20 times higher than that of BC and the number of adsorption sites and pore structures was higher. The largest adsorption capacity of FM-BC for Pb(II) was 165.88 mg/g, achieved at 298 K. The presence of Cu(II) in the water had a significant competitive influence on the adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC. The adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir models. The adsorption of Pb(II) by FM-BC is controlled by chemical adsorption, which is single-layer, uniform, and heterogeneous, and the adsorption process is spontaneous and endothermic. Through characterization and analysis, it was determined that Fe-Mn oxides participated in the adsorption of Pb(II). Fe2O3 and Fe(III) were transformed into FeOOH, while Mn2O3 was transformed into MnO2. The adsorption mechanism of FM-BC for Pb(II) mainly consisted of chemical precipitation, complexation, and ion exchange. In conclusion, Fe-Mn oxide modified biochar can effectively adsorb Pb(II), which is a promising biomass adsorption material for removing Pb(II) from wastewater.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19148420/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-F.T. and B.-H.L.; methodology, W.-T.T.; software, S.-F.T.; validation, H.Z., P.Z. and J.-F.G.; formal analysis, S.-F.T.; investigation, J.-G.H.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, W.-T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-F.T.; writing-review and editing, H.Z.; visualization, P.Z.; supervision, B.-H.L.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (2021NK2027), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2021JJ31159), and the Science and Technology Talent Support Project of Hunan Province (2019TJ-N05).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data for this study are available from the corresponding author via email: [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, G.Y.; Luo, J.M.; Liu, C.B.; Chu, L.; Ma, J.H.; Tang, Y.H.; Zeng, Z.B.; Luo, S.L. A highly efficient polyampholyte hydrogel sorbent based fixed-bed process for heavy metal removal in actual industrial effluent. Water Res. 2016, 89, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Venkateswarlu, S.; Yoon, M. Core-shell ferromagnetic nanorod based on amine polymer composite (Fe3O4@DAPF) for fast removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25362–25372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bolisetty, S.; Peydayesh, M.; Mezzenga, R. Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: Review and analysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Tsend, N.; Li, T.K.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, R.Q.; Gai, X.K.; Wang, H.P.; Shan, S.D. Microwave assisted hydrothermal preparation of rice straw hydrochars for adsorption of organics and heavy metals. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 273, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Alguacil, F.J.; Escudero, E. The removal of toxic metals from liquid effluents by ion exchange resins. Part VIII: Arsenic(III)/OH-/Dowex 1x8. Rev. Metal. 2018, 54, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chen, H.J.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, G.X.; Zhang, Z.B.; Xu, C.; Liu, Y.H.; Chen, J.; Zhuang, L.; Haya, T.; Wang, X.K. Enhanced adsorption of U(VI) and 241Am(III) from wastewater using Ca/Al layered double hydroxide@carbon nanotube composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 347, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elabbas, S.; Ouazzani, N.; Mandi, L.; Berrekhis, F.; Perdicakis, M.; Pontvianne, S.; Pons, M.N.; Lapicque, F.; Leclerc, J.P. Treatment of highly concentrated tannery wastewater using electrocoagulation: Influence of the quality of aluminium used for the electrode. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 319, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmed, W.; Mehmood, S.; Nunez-Delgado, A.; Ali, S.; Qaswar, M.; Khan, Z.H.; Ying, H.; Chen, D.-Y. Utilization of Citrullus lanatus L. seeds to synthesize a novel MnFe2O4-biochar adsorbent for the removal of U(VI) from wastewater: Insights and comparison between modified and raw biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, X.D.; Wan, Y.S.; Zheng, Y.L.; He, F.; Yu, Z.B.; Huang, J.; Wang, H.L.; Ok, Y.S.; Jiang, Y.S.; Gao, B. Surface functional groups of carbon-based adsorbents and their roles in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 608–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goncalves, S.P.C.; Strauss, M.; Teodoro Martinez, D.S. The positive fate of biochar addition to soil in the degradation of PHBV-silver nanoparticle composites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13845–13853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Igalavithana, A.D.; Kim, K.H.; Jung, J.M.; Heo, H.-S.; Kwon, E.E.; Tack, F.M.G.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Jeon, Y.J.; Ok, Y.S. Effect of biochars pyrolyzed in N2 and CO2, and feedstock on microbial community in metal(loid)s contaminated soils. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kvakic, M.; Pellerin, S.; Ciais, P.; Achat, D.L.; Augusto, L.; Denoroy, P.; Gerber, J.S.; Goll, D.; Mollier, A.; Mueller, N.D.; et al. Quantifying the limitation to world cereal production due to soil phosphorus status. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2018, 32, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoo, J.-C.; Beiyuan, J.; Wang, L.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Baek, K.; Bolan, N.S.; Ok, Y.S.; Li, X.D. A combination of ferric nitrate/EDDS-enhanced washing and sludge-derived biochar stabilization of metal-contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tan, G.Q.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, D. Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated rice straw biochar-A low-cost and highly effective sorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 84, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, B.; O’Connor, D.; Zhang, J.L.; Peng, T.Y.; Shen, Z.T.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Hou, D.Y. Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, G.C.; Sun, W.L.; Xu, Y.R.; Wang, H.Y.; Xu, N. Sorption of mercury (II) and atrazine by biochar, modified biochars and biochar based activated carbon in aqueous solution. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 211, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qiu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.H.; Gao, B.; Fan, Z.X.; Li, M.; Hao, H.R.; Wei, X.N.; Zhong, M. Degradation of anthraquinone dye reactive blue 19 using persulfate activated with Fe/Mn modified biochar: Radical/non-radical mechanisms and fixed-bed reactor study. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yunus, Z.M.; Yashni, G.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Othman, N.; Hamdan, R.; Ruslan, N.N. Advanced methods for activated carbon from agriculture wastes; a comprehensive review. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 102, 134–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.X.; Liu, H.B.; Chen, T.H.; Dong, C.; Sun, Y.B. Synthesis of magnetic biochar composites for enhanced uranium (VI) adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 1020–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, N.Y.; Qiao, J.; Yan, T.M. Arsenic immobilization through regulated ferrolysis in paddy field amendment with bismuth impregnated biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Y.F.; Haynes, R.J. Sorption of heavy metals by inorganic and organic components of solid wastes: Significance to use of wastes as low-cost adsorbents and immobilizing agents. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 40, 909–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, X.W.; Gao, M.L.; Qiu, W.W.; Khan, Z.H.; Liu, N.B.; Lin, L.N.; Song, Z.G. Fe-Mn-Ce oxide-modified biochar composites as efficient adsorbents for removing As(III) from water: Adsorption performance and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 17373–17382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, H.P.; Gu, L.Q.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, S.R.; Wan, H.Q.; Sun, J.Y.; Zhu, D.Q.; Xu, Z.Y. Removal of aqueous Pb(II) by adsorption on Al2O3-pillared layered MnO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 406, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Faheem; Yu, H.X.; Liu, J.; Shen, J.Y.; Sun, X.Y.; Li, J.S.; Wang, L.J. Preparation of MnOx-loaded biochar for Pb2+ removal: Adsorption performance and possible mechanism. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 66, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, G.X.; Wang, C.Y.; Yang, C.W.; Guo, P.C.; Yu, H.Q. Degradation of bisphenol a by peroxymonosulfate catalytically activated with Mn1.8Fe1.2O4 nanospheres: Synergism between Mn and Fe. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 12611–12618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, G.C.; Song, X.W.; Tao, L.; Sarkar, B.; Sarmah, A.K.; Zhang, W.X.; Lin, Q.T.; Xiao, R.B.; Liu, Q.J.; Wang, H.L. Novel Fe-Mn binary oxide-biochar as an adsorbent for removing Cd(II) from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; Sun, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.; Han, Y.T.; Wang, T.S.; Chen, J.W.; Tsang, D.C.W. Biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron as an efficient catalyst for organic degradation in groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, L.N.; Qiu, W.W.; Wang, D.; Huang, Q.; Song, Z.G.; Chau, H.W. Arsenic removal in aqueous solution by a novel Fe-Mn modified biochar composite: Characterization and mechanism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohammadi, S.; Mirghaffari, N. A preliminary study of the preparation of porous carbon from oil sludge for water treatment by simple pyrolysis or KOH activation. New Carbon Mater. 2015, 30, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, X.; Chen, B.L.; Zhu, L.Z. Transformation, morphology, and dissolution of silicon and carbon in rice straw-derived biochars under different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3411–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, J.; Hu, R.; Chen, G.C.; Xing, B.S. Facile synthesis of multifunctional bone biochar composites decorated with Fe/Mn oxide micro-nanoparticles: Physicochemical properties, heavy metals sorption behavior and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 123067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, S.S.; Gao, B.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Li, Y.C.; Ma, L.; Harris, W.G.; Migliaccio, K.W. Removal of arsenic by magnetic biochar prepared from pinewood and natural hematite. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, L.L.; Kong, L.; Qu, Z.; Lo, L.; Shen, G.Q. Magnetic biochar decorated with ZnS nanocrytals for Pb (II) removal. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, X.D.; Harris, W. Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5222–5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, L.K.; Liu, X.Y.; Huang, X.M.; Wang, W.D.; Sun, P.; Li, Y.M. Adsorption of Pb2+ from aqueous solutions using Fe-Mn binary oxides-loaded biochar: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 1853–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, S.S.; Yang, F.; Li, J.S.; Cheng, K. Porous biochar-nanoscale zero-valent iron composites: Synthesis, characterization and application for lead ion removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 746, 141037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ouyang, D.X.; Zhuo, Y.T.; Hu, L.; Zeng, Q.; Hu, Y.H.; He, Z.G. Research on the adsorption behavior of heavy metal ions by porous material prepared with silicate tailings. Minerals 2019, 9, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, S.B.; Ma, Y.B.; Chen, L.; Xian, K. Adsorption of aqueous Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+ ions by nano-hydroxyapatite: Single- and multi-metal competitive adsorption study. Geochem. J. 2010, 44, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kundu, S.; Chowdhury, I.H.; Naskar, M.K. Nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbon nanospheroids for selective dye adsorption and Pb(II) ion removal from waste water. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 9888–9898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Q.Y.; Zhang, T.C.; Ouyang, L.K.; Yuan, S.J. Single-Step hydrothermal synthesis of biochar from H3PO4-activated lettuce waste for efficient adsorption of Cd(II) in aqueous solution. Molecules 2022, 27, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, X. Monitoring the interfacial polymerization of piperazine and trimesoyl chloride with hydrophilic interlayer or macromolecular additive by in situ FT-IR sspectroscopy. Membranes 2020, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sounthararajah, D.P.; Loganathan, P.; Kandasamy, J.; Vigneswaran, S. Effects of humic acid and suspended solids on the removal of heavy metals from water by adsorption onto granular activated carbon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 10475–10489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, L.C.; Zhao, H.H.; Song, X.L.; Li, Y.K.; Li, D. The adsorption characteristics and mechanism of Pb(II) onto corn straw biochar. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2021, 15, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Feng, T.; Yi, T.; Wang, Q.B.; Li, P.W. Shrimp shells-derived biochar for efficient adsorption of Pb2+ in aqueous solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2021, 233, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Q.; Jiang, F.Y.; Ouyang, X.K.; Yang, L.Y.; Wang, Y.G. Adsorption of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution by Mussel Shell-Based Adsorbent: Preparation, Characterization, and Adsorption Performance. Materials 2021, 14, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, T.C.; Ma, X.L.; Cai, H.; Ma, Z.C.; Liang, H.F. Study on the Adsorption of CuFe2O4-Loaded Corncob Biochar for Pb(II). Molecules 2020, 25, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reddy, D.H.K.; Lee, S.-M. Magnetic biochar composite: Facile synthesis, characterization, and application for heavy metal removal. Colloids Surf. A 2014, 454, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Militaru, B.A.; Pode, R.; Lupa, L.; Schmidt, W.; Tekle-Roettering, A.; Kazamer, N. Using sewage sludge ash as an efficient adsorbent for Pb (II) and Cu (II) in single and binary systems. Molecules. 2020, 25, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Irani, M.; Amjadi, M.; Mousavian, M.A. Comparative study of lead sorption onto natural perlite, dolomite and diatomite. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 178, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, C.G.; Qiu, M.Q. High efficiency removal of Pb(II) in aqueous solution by a biochar-supported nanoscale ferrous sulfide composite. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmed, W.; Mehmood, S.; Nunez-Delgado, A.; Ali, S.; Qaswar, M.; Shakoor, A.; Mahmood, M.; Chen, D.Y. Enhanced adsorption of aqueous Pb(II) by modified biochar produced through pyrolysis of watermelon seeds. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Akpomie, K.G.; Conradie, J. Biogenic and chemically synthesized Solanum tuberosum peel-silver nanoparticle hybrid for the ultrasonic aided adsorption of bromophenol blue dye. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SEM-EDS images of (a) rice straw biochar (BC), (b) Fe-Mn oxide biochar (FM-BC), and (c) Fe-Mn oxide biochar after adsorption of Pb(II) (FM-BC-Pb).
Figure 1. SEM-EDS images of (a) rice straw biochar (BC), (b) Fe-Mn oxide biochar (FM-BC), and (c) Fe-Mn oxide biochar after adsorption of Pb(II) (FM-BC-Pb).
Ijerph 19 08420 g001aIjerph 19 08420 g001b
Figure 2. XPS spectrum of biochar (a) full scan spectrum (b) C 1s spectrum (c) Fe 2p spectrum (d) Mn 2p spectrum (e) Pb 4f spectrum.
Figure 2. XPS spectrum of biochar (a) full scan spectrum (b) C 1s spectrum (c) Fe 2p spectrum (d) Mn 2p spectrum (e) Pb 4f spectrum.
Ijerph 19 08420 g002aIjerph 19 08420 g002bIjerph 19 08420 g002c
Figure 3. FTIR spectrums of biochar.
Figure 3. FTIR spectrums of biochar.
Ijerph 19 08420 g003
Figure 4. The effect of pH value on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The effect of pH value on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijerph 19 08420 g004
Figure 5. The effect of FM-BC addition on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC.
Figure 5. The effect of FM-BC addition on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC.
Ijerph 19 08420 g005
Figure 6. The effect of coexisting ions on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The effect of coexisting ions on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijerph 19 08420 g006
Figure 7. The effects of time and initial concentration on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC.
Figure 7. The effects of time and initial concentration on Pb(II) adsorption by FM-BC.
Ijerph 19 08420 g007
Table 1. Surface property parameters of biochar.
Table 1. Surface property parameters of biochar.
MaterialsSurface AreaExternal Surface AreaMicropore Specific Surface AreaPore DiameterTotal Pore VolumeMicropore Volume
(m2/g)(m2/g)(m2/g)(nm)(cm3/g)(cm3/g)
BC0.7540.3710.3838.0890.00020.0001
FM-BC13.72611.2962.43010.4040.0030.0008
FM-BC-Pb26.43419.8846.5507.0080.0060.002
Table 2. Comparison of sorption capacity of adsorbents for Pb(II).
Table 2. Comparison of sorption capacity of adsorbents for Pb(II).
AdsorbentMax. Pb(II) Capacity (mg/g)References
Corn straw biochar81.63[43]
Shrimp shell biochar94.16[44]
Calcined mussel shell powder102.04[45]
CuFe2O4-loaded corncob biochar132.10[46]
BC70.33This study
FM-BC165.88
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, S.-F.; Zhou, H.; Tan, W.-T.; Huang, J.-G.; Zeng, P.; Gu, J.-F.; Liao, B.-H. Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fe-Mn Oxide Modified Biochar for Pb(II) in Wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148420

AMA Style

Tang S-F, Zhou H, Tan W-T, Huang J-G, Zeng P, Gu J-F, Liao B-H. Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fe-Mn Oxide Modified Biochar for Pb(II) in Wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(14):8420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Shang-Feng, Hang Zhou, Wen-Tao Tan, Jun-Guo Huang, Peng Zeng, Jiao-Feng Gu, and Bo-Han Liao. 2022. "Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fe-Mn Oxide Modified Biochar for Pb(II) in Wastewater" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 14: 8420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148420

APA Style

Tang, S. -F., Zhou, H., Tan, W. -T., Huang, J. -G., Zeng, P., Gu, J. -F., & Liao, B. -H. (2022). Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fe-Mn Oxide Modified Biochar for Pb(II) in Wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop