Next Article in Journal
Uncertainty and Well-Being amongst Homeworkers in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of University Staff
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors between Adolescents and Their Parents Is Mitigated by Parental Physical Activity—A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on University Students: An Analysis of Its Influence on Psychological and Academic Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adherence to Combined Healthy Movement Behavior Guidelines among Adolescents: Effects on Cardiometabolic Health Markers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 16
10.3390/ijerph191610434
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Study Protocol

Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries—Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings †

by
Daniel Gödde
1,*,‡,
Florian Bruckschen
2,‡,
Christian Burisch
3,
Veronika Weichert
4,
Kevin J. Nation
5,
Serge C. Thal
6,7,
Stephan Marsch
8,‡ and
Timur Sellmann
2,6,‡
1
Department of Pathology and Molecularpathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
2
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus BETHESDA zu Duisburg, 47053 Duisburg, Germany
3
State of North Rhine-Westphalia/Regional Government, 44145 Düsseldorf, Germany
4
Department of Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Duisburg, 47249 Duisburg, Germany
5
NZRN, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
6
Department of Anaesthesiology I, University Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
7
Department of Anesthesiology, HELIOS University Hospital, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
8
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
This work is part of the doctoral thesis of Florian Bruckschen.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10434; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610434
Submission received: 12 June 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 22 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiometabolic Health and Lifestyle Behaviors in Young People)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Injuries related to resuscitation are not usually systematically recorded and documented. By evaluating this data, conclusions could be drawn about the quality of the resuscitation, with the aim of improving patient care and safety. (2) Methods: We are planning to conduct a multicentric, retrospective 3-phased study consisting of (1) a worldwide literature review (scoping review), (2) an analysis of anatomical pathological findings from local institutions in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany to assess the transferability of the review data to the German healthcare system, and (3) depending on the results, possibly establishing potential prospective indicators for resuscitation-related injuries as part of quality assurance measures. (3) Conclusions: From the comparison of literature and local data, the picture of resuscitation-related injuries will be focused on and quality indicators will be derived.

1. Introduction

Manual and/or mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with chest compressions and ventilations maintains minimal organ perfusion in the event of cardiac arrest (CA). CPR averts the immediate death of the patient until circulatory function is reestablished by return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The current standard CPR technique was initially described in the early 1960s [1,2,3] and has become the gold standard treatment for all patients in CA.
CPR is a frequent event, which if successful can be associated with considerable follow-up costs. Worldwide over 135 million cardiovascular deaths occur each year with an increasing prevalence in coronary heart disease cases [4]. The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) ranges from 20 to 140 per 100,000 people [5]. In 2019, the German Resuscitation Register [6] data from 88 rescue services showed 15,274 patients with OHCA and ROSC and 3741 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and ROSC from 118 participating hospitals. These numbers represent approximately 18% of treated CA patients [7], meaning that approximately 60,000 CPR procedures occur per year.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation may initially achieve ROSC, but the overall survival rates are low and range from 2% to 11% [5]. In order to improve the incidence of ROSC, national and international standardized guidelines have been established [8,9,10]. However, even if delivered according to these guidelines, CPR is often inefficient [11], providing only 10–30% of normal blood flow to the heart and 30–40% of normal blood flow to the brain [12,13,14,15]. With high quality chest compressions (CC) blood flow can be reestablished by up to 90% [11,16,17,18,19]. Therefore, high quality CPR is key to improve patient survival [20] even though it may result in injuries [21].
Despite the potentially lifesaving properties of CC, the key feature is repeated blunt force trauma to the chest, which can lead to extensive traumatic skeletal and non-skeletal injuries [22]. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation involves vigorous, rhythmic chest compressions performed manually or with the aid of a device. The reported incidence of CPR-associated injuries ranges from 21% to more than 65% [21].
The duration of CPR has been associated with the number of rib fractures and the occurrence of sternal fractures [23]. The duration of CPR in OHCA management has been identified as an independent risk factor for chest injuries, possibly due to the difficulty of maintaining the adequate quality of CPR [24]. Other aspects of CPR, such as hand position during CC [24,25,26], CC rate [27,28], CC depth [29,30,31,32,33], or chest wall recoil [34,35] are still under debate.
Injuries related to CPR can affect the skeletal system, as well as soft tissue and organs. Commonly, fractures occur of the ribs and sternum. Less often, CPR causes fractures of the larynx or injury to the stomach, spleen, heart, or liver [36,37]. Gastric injuries are less frequent [38,39,40] but are a potentially lethal complication after initial successful resuscitation [40]. Resuscitation-associated major liver injury, such as rupture or laceration, and hemorrhage or hematoma are also rare and indicate compromised hemostasis with no significant influence on the overall outcome [41]. Heart injury, rupture of the heart, pericardial tamponade, and aortic dissection have been reported [37,42] as well as lung contusion [42], lung herniation [43], and upper airway and pulmonary injuries [44].
In patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, the rapid use of automatic external defibrillator has a positive impact on survival [45,46,47] but may cause skin injuries [48,49] or cardiac and renal damages due to rhabdomyolysis [37].
Risk factors for injuries include female gender [50,51] and older age [42,51]. Skeletal, organ and relevant soft tissue injuries occur very rarely after pediatric CPR [52,53,54]. Even when performed by nonmedical or untrained individuals, CPR did not increase the likelihood of injury in the pediatric population [55]. In adults, sternal fractures occur in at least one-fifth of cases and rib fractures and/or sternal fractures in at least one-third of patients during conventional CPR [56], sometimes causing a flail chest [57,58].
Usually, CPR is performed manually, although external mechanical assist devices may also be available [59,60,61,62]. Mechanical CPR devices may provide a useful adjunct to standard treatment in situations where high-quality manual CC cannot be provided [20]. However, the use of devices during CPR can also lead to injuries. In an animal model, the LUCAS™ device shows superior resuscitation outcomes and less thoracic injuries, compared to the Corpuls CPR [63]. However, in forensic autopsy studies, the use of LUCAS™ compared with manual CPR was associated in part with significantly higher rates of sternal fractures, rib fractures, and severe soft tissue injuries, including several case reports of potentially life-threatening injuries [64,65,66,67]. In comparison, the patterns of trauma in autopsy records between AutoPulse® CPR and manual CPR showed different characteristic patterns of injuries. Manual CPR showed a characteristic pattern with higher frequencies of anterior rib fractures, sternal fractures, and midline chest abrasions along the sternum. AutoPulse® CPR-associated injuries included a high frequency of posterior rib fractures and skin abrasions located along the anterolateral chest and shoulder and a few cases of visceral injuries [68]. The use of CardioPump® showed an increased frequency of thoracic injuries following CPR [69]. The incidence of skeletal injuries increased with patient age along with the use of CPR devices [70] (Table 1).
In addition to clinical findings and radiological diagnostics, autopsies also play an important role in the identification of CPR-associated injuries [50,69,71,72,73]. Autopsies show the highest diagnostic sensitivity. Both frequent skeletal injuries and the rarer injuries to internal organs are reliably detected by autopsy [51,74,75,76]. Postmortem diagnostics can also be used to answer questions regarding injury patterns or the impacts of CPR related injury on survival [55,68].
The aim of our study is to further contribute to the understanding of CPR-associated injuries. To do this, data from published international medical literature will be compared with local clinical and post-mortem data. We expect to fill knowledge gaps regarding a perceived discrepancy between the expected and actual incidence of resuscitation-associated injury patterns. We will report their extent, as well as their influence on outcome. Our results will inform the development of possible indicators for improving CPR quality.
CPR technique continues to be developed. To date, original papers and systematic reviews focus on individual aspects of CPR. In addition, there is significant heterogeneity in study design and research methodology [56,77]. Although current guidelines address CPR quality, strategies to systematically monitor CPR quality are rare [16,78]. Here, the influence of CPR feedback and CPR training could contribute to improve CPR quality [79,80,81]. In other fields of medicine, the use of a systematic continuous quality improvement approach has been shown to optimize outcomes [82,83,84].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a retrospective study undertaken following the Declaration of Helsinki principles and after approval by the local Ethics Committee of the Witten/Herdecke University. The study is divided into three sections: a scoping review, a local national retrospective multicenter evaluation, and potentially, an evolution of quality indicators based on the results of our previous findings.

2.1.1. Literature Review

The review protocol was developed using the statement and checklist of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (30178033). The search strategy was developed by all authors (TS, DG, CB, KN, FB, VW, ST, SM), with detailed search terms subsequently generated. To identify potentially relevant documents, the following bibliographic databases are searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library. The review will include all kinds of published academic peer-reviewed research articles, review articles, and case reports in English and German except unpublished “gray” literature. The search strategy for MEDLINE is structured as follows: (“Heart arrest” [All Fields] OR “cardiac arrest” [All Fields]) AND (“cardiopulmonary resuscitation” [All Fields] OR “CPR” [All Fields] OR “chest compression” [All Fields]) AND (“manual” [All Fields] OR “hands” [All Fields] OR “hands-only” [All Fields]) AND (“Mechanical” [All Fields] OR “LUCAS” [All Fields] OR “AutoPulse” [All Fields] OR “Load distributing band” [All Fields]) AND (“injury” [All Fields] OR “injuries” [All Fields] OR “trauma” [All Fields] OR “violation” [All Fields] OR “hurt” [All Fields] OR “lesion” [All Fields] OR “harm” [All Fields] OR “findings” [All Fields]) AND (“post mortem” [All Fields] OR “dead” [All Fields] OR “deceased” [All Fields] OR “autopsy” [All Fields]). The search results will be exported in Rayyan (www.rayyan.ai, accessed on 15 May 2022) and duplicates will be removed. All titles and abstracts are split up and screened in teams of two reviewers independently. Disagreements will be resolved via discussion, with reference to the a priori eligibility criteria until consensus is achieved. Residual data are collected and documented if they meet the inclusion criteria (Table 2).

2.1.2. Local Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation

The results from our scoping review will be compared to the results of autopsies undertaken in the last 10 years in participating universities and private pathology laboratories, as well as forensic medicine departments in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. These will be analyzed to determine the occurrence of mechanic traumatic resuscitation-related injuries. The data from this regional review will be analyzed to determine recommendations for quality improvement and their application more broadly across Germany.

2.1.3. Evolution of Quality Indicators

Derived key variables from the collected review data will be used to suggest parameters to evaluate resuscitation outcomes as part of quality management systems. These key variables could be used to determine criteria for data collection in the German Resuscitation Register.

2.2. Data Analysis

Statistical data analysis will be performed using the open-source software “PSPP” [85]. Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentages. Wherever it is appropriate, t-test will be used for the comparison of means between groups and Pearson’s chi-squared test will be used to check the independence between categorical variables. p values less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

3. Conclusions

To improve the quality of CPR, all sub-areas and possible complications of this complex procedure need to be examined in detail. Although CPR is primarily about restoring blood flow, and thus the perfusion of the organs, it is ultimately the outcome that determines the success. It is, therefore, of interest to not only optimize the process and performance of CPR but also analyze possible risk factors and complications. The knowledge of possible injuries, frequency of occurrence, severity, and risk factors can lead to prevention strategies for both health professional and lay rescuers. Following the use of CPR devices, which may be accompanied by more frequent and severe injuries, consideration should be given to a patient clinical examination. Thus, complications for the patient, some of which can be serious, can be reduced and follow-up costs minimized.
By standardizing the process of CPR together with a continuous training of potential professional and lay rescuers, the quality of CPR can be proven [79,80,81]. To date, certain quality assurance parameters have already been identified [86] and established [16]. Complications, such as CPR-associated injuries, have been previously discussed, but number, frequency, and severity have not yet been described in a consistent manner. Furthermore, to date, no quality indicators have been derived from findings.
It is the aim of this study to investigate and develop a map of possible CPR-associated injuries. We propose that the knowledge of the possible types of CPR-associated injuries, frequency of occurrence, and degree of impact on CPR and outcome can be used to develop strategies of avoiding the occurrence of such injuries. In addition, a classification of the CPR-associated injuries into minor and major groups will not only simplify therapeutic decisions after CPR but also guide mitigation strategies. In the identification and weighting of CPR-associated injuries, postmortem findings play an important role in addition to clinical data [50,71,72,73,87]. The combining of clinical and postmortem data can further inform the likely severity of injuries. We hypothesize that our comparison of local data with findings from the literature will help fill in gaps in knowledge.
This study has several limitations. First, both the scoping review and multicenter evaluation are based on retrospective data. Furthermore, the scoping review will include only papers in English and German and no analysis of the quality of the included papers will be performed. In addition, we acknowledge limitations in our search strategy and that the local multicenter evaluation covers a limited period.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S., D.G. and S.M.; formal analysis, F.B., C.B. and V.W; funding acquisition, D.G.; methodology T.S., D.G. and S.M.; project administration, T.S.; writing—original draft, D.G., T.S. and K.J.N.; writing—review and editing, K.J.N., S.M., F.B., T.S., V.W., S.C.T., C.B. and D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University Witten/Herdecke (No. 47/2022, date of approval 22 March 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jude, R.J.; Kouwenhoven, W.B.; Knickerbocker, G.G. Cardiac arrest. Report of application of external cardiac massage on 118 patients. JAMA 1961, 178, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kouwenhoven, B.W.; Jude, J.R.; Knickerbocker, G.G. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA 1960, 173, 1064–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ristagno, G.; Tang, W.; Weil, M.H. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: From the beginning to the present day. Crit. Care Clin. 2009, 25, 133–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahern, R.M.; Lozano, R.; Naghavi, M.; Foreman, K.; Gakidou, E.; Murray, C.J.I. Improving the public health utility of global cardiovascular mortality data: The rise of ischemic heart disease. Popul. Health Metr. 2011, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Berdowski, J.; Berg, R.A.; Tijssen, J.G.P.; Koster, R.W. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010, 81, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fischer, M.W.J.; Gräsner, J.T.; Seewald, S.; Brenner, S.; Jantzen, T.; Bein, B.; Bohn, A. Jahresbericht des Deutschen Reanimationsregisters–Außerklinische Reanimation 2019. Anästhesiologie Intensivmed. 2020, 61, V89–V93. [Google Scholar]
  7. Seewald, S.B.S.; Fischer, M.; Gräsner, J.T.; Wnent, J.; Jantzen, T.; Ristau, P.; Bein, B. Jahresbericht des Deutschen Reanimationsregister—Innerklinische Reanimation 2019. Anästhesiologie Intensivmed. 2020, 61, V100–V102. [Google Scholar]
  8. Soar, J.; Böttiger, B.W.; Carli, P.; Couper, K.; Deakin, C.D.; Djärv, T.; Lott, C.; Olasveengen, T.; Paal, P.; Pellis, T.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2021, 161, 115–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Panchal, A.R.; Bartos, J.A.; Cabanas, J.G.; Donnino, M.W.; Drennan, I.R.; Hirsch, K.G.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Kurz, M.C.; Lavonas, E.J.; Morley, P.T.; et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2020, 142 (Suppl. S2), S366–S468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. German Resuscitation Council—Deutscher Rat Für Wiederbelebung. 2022. Available online: https://www.grc-org.de (accessed on 21 April 2022).
  11. Meaney, P.A.; Bobrow, B.J.; Mancini, M.E.; Christenson, J.; de Caen, A.R.; Bhanji, F.; Abella, B.S.; Kleinman, M.E.; Edelson, D.P.; Berg, R.A.; et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013, 128, 417–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ralston, S.H.; Voorhees, W.D.; Babbs, C.F. Intrapulmonary epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Improved regional blood flow and resuscitation in dogs. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1984, 13, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Michael, J.R.; Guerci, A.D.; Koehler, R.C.; Shi, A.Y.; Tsitlik, J.; Chandra, N.; Niedermeyer, E.; Rogers, M.C.; Traystman, R.J.; Weisfeldt, M.L. Mechanisms by which epinephrine augments cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1984, 69, 822–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Halperin, H.R.; Tsitlik, J.E.; Guerci, A.D.; Mellits, E.D.; Levin, H.R.; Shi, A.Y.; Chandra, N.; Weisfeldt, M.L. Determinants of blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1986, 73, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Rubertsson, S.; Karlsten, R. Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS: A new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2005, 65, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kleinman, M.E.; Brennan, E.E.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Swor, R.A.; Terry, M.; Bobrow, B.J.; Gazmuri, R.J.; Travers, A.H.; Rea, T. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015, 132 (Suppl. S2), S414–S435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zöllner, K.; Sellmann, T.; Wetzchewald, D.; Schwager, H.; Cleff, C.; Thal, S.C.; Marsch, S. U SO CARE-The Impact of Cardiac Ultrasound during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vogt, L.; Sellmann, T.; Wetzchewald, D.; Schwager, H.; Russo, S.; Marsch, S. Effects of Bag Mask Ventilation and Advanced Airway Management on Adherence to Ventilation Recommendations and Chest Compression Fraction: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rifai, S.; Sellmann, T.; Wetchewald, D.; Schwager, H.; Tschan, F.; Russo, S.G.; Marsch, S. Hands-On Times, Adherence to Recommendations and Variance in Execution among Three Different CPR Algorithms: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Simulator-Based Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Poole, K.; Couper, K.; Smyth, M.A.; Yeung, J.; Perkins, G.D. Mechanical CPR: Who? When? How? Crit. Care 2018, 22, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sommers, M.S. Potential for injury: Trauma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Heart Lung 1991, 20, 287–293. [Google Scholar]
  22. Righi, F.A.; Jenkins, S.; Lin, P.T. Nonskeletal injuries related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An autopsy study. J. Forensic Sci. 2021, 66, 2299–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jang, S.J.; Cha, Y.K.; Kim, J.S.; Do, H.H.; Bak, S.H.; Kwack, W.G. Computed tomographic findings of chest injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: More complications for prolonged chest compressions? Medicine (Baltimore) 2020, 99, e21685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Takayama, W.; Koguchi, H.; Endo, A.; Otomo, Y. The Association between Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Settings and Chest Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2018, 33, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qvigstad, E.; Kramer-Johansen, J.; Tomte, O.; Skalhegg, T.; Sorensen, O.; Sunde, K.; Olasveengen, T.M. Clinical pilot study of different hand positions during manual chest compressions monitored with capnography. Resuscitation 2013, 84, 1203–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Orlowski, J.P. Optimum position for external cardiac compression in infants and young children. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986, 15, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Idris, A.H.; Guffey, D.; Pepe, P.E.; Brown, S.P.; Brooks, S.C.; Callaway, C.W.; Christenson, J.; Davis, D.P.; Daya, M.R.; Gray, R.; et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Idris, A.H.; Guffey, D.; Aufderheide, T.P.; Brown, S.; Morrison, L.J.; Nichols, P.; Powell, J.; Daya, M.; Bigham, B.L.; Atkins, D.L.; et al. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation 2012, 125, 3004–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stiell, I.G.; Brown, S.P.; Nichol, G.; Cheskes, S.; Vaillancourt, C.; Callaway, C.W.; Morrison, L.J.; Christenson, J.; Aufderheide, T.P.; Davis, D.P.; et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation 2014, 130, 1962–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hellevuo, H.; Sainio, M.; Nevalainen, R.; Huhtala, H.; Olkkola, K.T.; Tenhunen, J.; Hoppu, S. Deeper chest compression—More complications for cardiac arrest patients? Resuscitation 2013, 84, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hostler, D.; Everson-Stewart, S.; Rea, T.D.; Stiell, I.G.; Callaway, C.W.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Sears, G.K.; Emerson, S.S.; Nichol, G. Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: Prospective, cluster-randomised trial. BMJ 2011, 342, d512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stiell, I.G.; Brown, S.P.; Christenson, J.; Cheskes, S.; Nichol, G.; Powell, J.; Bigham, B.; Morrison, L.J.; Larsen, J.; Hess, E.; et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 1192–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Moller Nielsen, A.; Rasmussen, L.S. Damage and depth of chest compressions. Resuscitation 2013, 84, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zuercher, M.; Hilwig, R.W.; Ranger-Moore, J.; Nysaether, J.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Berg, M.D.; Kern, K.B.; Sutton, R.; Berg, R.A. Leaning during chest compressions impairs cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow in piglet cardiac arrest. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 38, 1141–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Niles, D.E.; Sutton, R.M.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Glatz, A.; Zuercher, M.; Maltese, M.R.; Eilevstjonn, J.; Abella, B.S.A.; Becker, L.B.; Berg, R.A. Prevalence and hemodynamic effects of leaning during CPR. Resuscitation 2011, 82 (Suppl. S2), S23–S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Olds, K.; Byard, R.W.; Langlois, N.E. Injuries associated with resuscitation—An overview. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2015, 33, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rudinska, L.I.; Hejna, P.; Ihnat, P.; Smatanova, M.; Dvoracek, I.; Truhlar, A. Injuries associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Soud. Lek. 2014, 59, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hata, Y.; Ichimata, S.; Nishida, N. Two autopsy cases with injuries to the stomach following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Leg. Med. (Tokyo) 2021, 53, 101916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diop, S.; Gautier, A.; Moussa, N.; Legriel, S. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related left gastric artery laceration. Intensive Care Med. 2019, 45, 1307–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spoormans, I.; Hoorenbeeck, K.V.; Balliu, L.; Jorens, P.G. Gastric perforation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Review of the literature. Resuscitation 2010, 81, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Meron, G.; Kurkciyan, I.; Sterz, F.; Susani, M.; Domanovits, H.; Tobler, K.; Bohdjalian, A.; Laggner, A.N. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-associated major liver injury. Resuscitation 2007, 75, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moriguchi, S.; Hamanaka, K.; Nakamura, M.; Takaso, M.; Baba, M.; Hitosugi, M. Aging is only significant factor causing CPR-induced injuries and serious injuries. Leg. Med. 2021, 48, 101828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aggarwal, S.; Loehrke, M. Lung herniation post cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J. Postgrad. Med. 2014, 60, 212–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ram, P.; Menezes, R.G.; Sirinvaravong, N.; Luis, S.A.; Hussain, S.A.; Madadin, M.; Lasrado, S.; Eiger, G. Breaking your heart-A review on CPR-related injuries. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2018, 36, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chan, P.S.; Nichol, G.; Krumholz, H.M.; Spertus, J.A.; Nallamothu, B.K. Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Sasson, C.; Rogers, M.A.M.; Dahl, J.; Kellermann, A.L. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2010, 3, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Caffrey, S.L.; Willoughby, P.J.; Pepe, P.E.; Becker, L.B. Public use of automated external defibrillators. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1242–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. NishanthaVadysinghe, A.; Thambirajah, B.; Denniss, K.M. Abuse of defibrillator pads: Suicide by electrocution. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2021, 83, 102252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sucu, M.; Davutoglu, V.; Ozer, O. Electrical cardioversion. Ann. Saudi Med. 2009, 29, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Black, C.J.; Busuttil, A.; Robertson, C. Chest wall injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004, 63, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yamaguchi, R.; Makino, Y.; Chiba, F.; Torimitsu, S.; Yajima, D.; Inokuchi, G.; Motomura, A.; Hashimoto, M.; Hoshioka, Y.; Shinozaki, T.; et al. Frequency and influencing factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries during implementation of the American Heart Association 2010 Guidelines: A retrospective study based on autopsy and postmortem computed tomography. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2017, 131, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ondruschka, B.; Baier, C.; Siekmeyer, M.; Buschmann, C.; Dreßler, J.; Bernhard, M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-associated injuries in still-/newborns, infants and toddlers in a German forensic collective. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 279, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Price, E.A.; Rush, L.R.; Perper, J.A.; Bell, M.D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related injuries and homicidal blunt abdominal trauma in children. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2000, 21, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bush, C.M.; Jones, J.S.; Cohle, S.D.; Johnson, H. Pediatric injuries from cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1996, 28, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Matshes, E.W.; Lew, E.O. Do resuscitation-related injuries kill infants and children? Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2010, 31, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hoke, R.S.; Chamberlain, D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004, 63, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Thompson, M.; Langlois, N.E.I.; Byard, R.W. Flail Chest Following Failed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. J. Forensic Sci. 2017, 62, 1220–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ananiadou, O.; Karaiskos, T.; Givissis, P.; Drossos, G. Operative stabilization of skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a cardiac surgical patient. Interact. CardioVascular Thorac. Surg. 2010, 10, 478–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Plaisance, P.; Adnet, F.; Vicaut, E.; Hennequin, B.; Magne, P.; Prudhomme, C.; Lambert, Y.; Cantineau, J.P.; Leopold, C.; Ferraci, C.; et al. Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a prehospital advanced cardiac life support. A randomized multicenter study. Circulation 1997, 95, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wik, L. Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000, 47, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Steen, S.; Liao, Q.; Pierre, L.; Paskevicius, A.; Sjöberg, T. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002, 55, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gaxiola, A.; Varon, J. Evolution and new perspective of chest compression mechanical devices. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008, 26, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ruemmler, R.; Stein, J.; Duenges, B.; Renz, M.; Hartmann, E.K. Standardized post-resuscitation damage assessment of two mechanical chest compression devices: A prospective randomized large animal trial. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2021, 29, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Friberg, N.; Schmidbauer, S.; Walther, C.; Englund, E. Skeletal and soft tissue injuries after manual and mechanical chest compressions. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes 2019, 5, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lardi, C.; Egger, C.; Larribau, R.; Niquille, M.; Mangin, P.; Fracasso, T. Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS2): A forensic autopsy study. Int. J. Legal Med. 2015, 129, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Smekal, D.; Johansson, J.; Huzevka, T.; Rubertsson, S. No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device—A pilot study. Resuscitation 2009, 80, 1104–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Magliocca, A.; Rezoagli, E.; Zani, D.; Manfredi, M.; De Giorgio, D.; Olivari, D.; Fumagalli, F.; Langer, T.; Avalli, L.; Grasselli, G.; et al. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-associated Lung Edema (CRALE). A Translational Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 203, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Pinto, D.C.; Haden-Pinneri, K.; Love, J.C. Manual and automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): A comparison of associated injury patterns. J. Forensic Sci. 2013, 58, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baubin, M.; Sumann, G.; Rabl, W.; Eibl, G.; Wenzel, V.; Mair, P. Increased frequency of thorax injuries with ACD-CPR. Resuscitation 1999, 41, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Merdji, H.; Poussardin, C.; Helms, J.; Meziani, F. Vertebral fracture as a complication of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. 2018, 44, 1750–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Smekal, D.; Hansen, T.; Sandler, H.; Rubertsson, S. Comparison of computed tomography and autopsy in detection of injuries after unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2013, 84, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rabl, W.; Baubin, M.; Broinger, G.; Scheithauer, R. Serious complications from active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Int. J. Legal Med. 1996, 109, 84–89. [Google Scholar]
  73. Deliliga, A.; Chatzinikolaou, F.; Koutsoukis, D.; Chrysovergis, I.; Voultsos, P. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) complications encountered in forensic autopsy cases. BMC Emerg. Med. 2019, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lederer, W.; Mair, D.; Rabl, W.; Baubin, M. Frequency of rib and sternum fractures associated with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation is underestimated by conventional chest X-ray. Resuscitation 2004, 60, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Buschmann, C.T.; Tsokos, M. Frequent and rare complications of resuscitation attempts. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hashimoto, Y.; Moriya, F.; Furumiya, J. Forensic aspects of complications resulting from cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Leg. Med. (Tokyo) 2007, 9, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wininger, K.L. Chest compressions: Biomechanics and injury. Radiol. Technol. 2007, 78, 269–274. [Google Scholar]
  78. Genbrugge, C.; Eertmans, W.; Salcido, D.D. Monitor the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2020. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2020, 26, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cheng, A.; Overly, F.; Kessler, D.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Lin, Y.; Doan, Q.; Duff, J.P.; Tofil, N.M.; Bhanji, F.; Adler, M.; et al. Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback, Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role. Resuscitation 2015, 87, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lin, Y.; Cheng, A.; Grant, V.J.; Currie, G.R.; Hecker, K.G. Improving CPR quality with distributed practice and real-time feedback in pediatric healthcare providers—A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation 2018, 130, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Birkenes, T.S.; Myklebust, H.; Neset, A.; Kramer-Johansen, J. Quality of CPR performed by trained bystanders with optimized pre-arrival instructions. Resuscitation 2014, 85, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Jollis, J.G.; Granger, C.B.; Henry, T.D.; Antman, E.M.; Berger, P.B.; Moyer, P.H.; Pratt, F.D.; Rokos, I.C.; Acuna, A.R.; Roettig, M.L.; et al. Systems of care for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: A report From the American Heart Association’s Mission: Lifeline. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2012, 5, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Nestler, D.M.; Noheria, A.; Haro, L.H.; Stead, L.G.; Decker, W.W.; Scanlan-Hanson, L.N.; Lennon, R.J.; Lim, C.; Holmes, D.R.; Rihal, C.S.; et al. Sustaining improvement in door-to-balloon time over 4 years: The Mayo clinic ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2009, 2, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Santana, M.J.; Stelfox, H.T. Quality indicators used by trauma centers for performance measurement. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 72, 1298–1302, discussion 12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Free Software Foundation. 2022. Available online: http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp (accessed on 12 March 2022).
  86. Kramer-Johansen, J.; Edelson, D.P.; Losert, H.; Köhler, K.; Abella, B.S. Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation 2007, 74, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Baubin, M.; Rabl, W.; Pfeiffer, K.P.; Benzer, A.; Gilly, H. Chest injuries after active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) in cadavers. Resuscitation 1999, 43, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. CPR-related injuries and risk factors associated with CPR devices.
Table 1. CPR-related injuries and risk factors associated with CPR devices.
CPR DeviceCPR-Related InjuriesRisk Factors
LUCASTMRib and sternal fracture; haemato- and pneumothorax; pulmonary contusion; lung bleeding; pulmonary edema; mediastinal, retrosternal, and pericostal bleeding; hematoperitoneum; aortic laceration; right coronary artery rupture; cardiac petechiae; epicardial hemorrhage; myocardial rupture; hemopericardium; laceration of esophageal, tracheal, and gastric mucosae; pancreatic bleeding; perirenal bleeding; liver and spleen laceration; chest cutaneous lesions; breast implant rupturePositioning/handling the device, CPR duration, age, female gender
AutoPulse®Rib and vertebral fractures; skin abrasions; liver, mesenteric, and splenic laceration; hemoperitoneum
CardioPump®Vertebral, sternal, and rib fractures; skin abrasions; liver laceration
Table
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the scoping review.
Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the scoping review.
Inclusion criteriahuman (male/female, any gender, any age)
clinical or non-clinical resuscitation
manual or mechanical resuscitation
any type of injuries
any anatomical region of injuries
any number of injuries
any underlying diseases
any procedure to determine injuries
any patient outcome
Exclusion criteriaanimal model
resuscitation without injuries
injuries resulting from inadequate perfusion/ventilation
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gödde, D.; Bruckschen, F.; Burisch, C.; Weichert, V.; Nation, K.J.; Thal, S.C.; Marsch, S.; Sellmann, T. Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries—Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610434

AMA Style

Gödde D, Bruckschen F, Burisch C, Weichert V, Nation KJ, Thal SC, Marsch S, Sellmann T. Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries—Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(16):10434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gödde, Daniel, Florian Bruckschen, Christian Burisch, Veronika Weichert, Kevin J. Nation, Serge C. Thal, Stephan Marsch, and Timur Sellmann. 2022. "Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries—Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 16: 10434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610434

APA Style

Gödde, D., Bruckschen, F., Burisch, C., Weichert, V., Nation, K. J., Thal, S. C., Marsch, S., & Sellmann, T. (2022). Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries—Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop