Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Undergraduates’ Social Isolation on Smartphone Addiction: The Roles of Academic Anxiety and Social Media Use
Previous Article in Journal
Country Parks as Sites of Emergency Medical Facility: A Case of COVID-19 in Hangzhou, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Mancini et al. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089

1
Department of Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics (DIEM), Laboratory “Ambients and Radiations (Amb.Ra.)”, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
2
Institute of Construction Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, 1658 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15901; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315901
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment)

Figure Legend

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 3. Diagram of the sources (brown square boxes), processes (green round boxes), and parameters that a global dynamic radon model must consider. The time-dependent parameters are in blue [20]. The original copyright owner for this figure picture should be Doctor Lluis Font Guiteras. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.
The correct Legend
Figure 3. Diagram of the sources (brown square boxes), processes (green round boxes), and parameters that a global dynamic radon model must consider. The time-dependent parameters are in blue. Figure by Font L, available at https://icnts2008.bo.infn.it (accessed on 15 December 2021). Reprinted with permission from Lluis Font (2008).

Reference

  1. Mancini, S.; Vilnitis, M.; Guida, M. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mancini, S.; Vilnitis, M.; Guida, M. Correction: Mancini et al. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315901

AMA Style

Mancini S, Vilnitis M, Guida M. Correction: Mancini et al. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):15901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mancini, Simona, Martins Vilnitis, and Michele Guida. 2022. "Correction: Mancini et al. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 15901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315901

APA Style

Mancini, S., Vilnitis, M., & Guida, M. (2022). Correction: Mancini et al. A Novel Strategy for the Assessment of Radon Risk Based on Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8089. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop