Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Malocclusions between Cancer Patients and Healthy Peers
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Rural Tourism Development on Residents’ Satisfaction with the Local Environment, Socio-Economy and Quality of Life in Al-Ahsa Region, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness in Galicia, Northwest Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Mediating Effects of Work–Life Balance (WLB) and Ease of Using WLB Programs in the Relationship between WLB Organizational Culture and Turnover Intention
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effect of Psychological Anxiety Caused by COVID-19 on Job Self-Esteem and Job Satisfaction of Airline Flight Attendants

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4043; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074043
by Yelin Shin, Jinyoung Olivia Choi and Sunghyup Sean Hyun *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4043; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074043
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 25 March 2022 / Accepted: 27 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

To begin, you did not properly motivate this study from a practical standpoint. 

Why is this topic important right now, especially in light of the current competitive conditions?

What kinds of industry-specific evidence can you offer that would make industry leaders sit up and pay attention to your study?

Answers to these and related questions will help make a much stronger case for pursuing this line of inquiry.

 

Additionally, you did not properly motivate this study from a conceptual standpoint.

What are the specific gaps in the literature that you are attempting to address?  I encourage you to clearly and cogently explain:

(1) how the focal study addresses an important industry priority;

(2) how the topic is connected to existing theory;

(3) what we already know about practice and theory;

(4) what specifically we do not know;

(5) why we need to know what we do not know;

and (6) how this study or inquiry will help close the practical and theoretical gaps between what we know and do not know.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks to the Authors for the opportunity to see their work, I leave my comments for consideration below. First of all, congratulations to the Authors of a well-written article.

  1. Literature Review and Hypotheses

 

The theoretical part is concise and very well written. I suggest authors to consider including the most important information from the following articles:

https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179704

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073419

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073383

 

  1. Research Methods

3.2. Measurement

At this point, I am asking the Authors to describe in more detail the research tools used

 

  1. Research Results

Everything that is needed is presented in the main part describing the results of the research. The results were presented in what I believe is the best. At the beginning, demographic data were presented, and then the next steps of statistical analysis. Because in my articles I use similar methods myself. I don't think that this part would need to be changed.

 

  1. Discussion and Implications

I do not think that in the present form of the article I can propose anything that will improve its quality. The article is well written

 

  1. Limitation and Future Research

In the limitations of the research, it is worth mentioning that the research refers to a situation in which the limitations of flying were greater than the present ones

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop