Next Article in Journal
A Mixed-Methods Study on Use of Different Tobacco Products among Younger and Older Adults with Lower and Higher Levels of Nicotine Exposure in California in 2019–2020
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of COVID-19 Vaccine Perception, Hope, and Fear on the Travel Bubble Program
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection on Environmental Surfaces in a University Setting of Central Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Post-COVID-19 Tourists’ Preferences, Attitudes and Travel Expectations: A Study in Guayaquil, Ecuador
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph19095562
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review of Tourism Destination Resilience Research

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095562
by Tian Wang 1,2, Zhaoping Yang 1,2,*, Xiaodong Chen 1,2 and Fang Han 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Yeongbae Choe
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095562
Submission received: 11 April 2022 / Revised: 30 April 2022 / Accepted: 2 May 2022 / Published: 3 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Livable, Healthy and Lively Cities and Tourism Destinations: Facing Pandemics and Other Crisis Situations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript focuses on tourism/destination resilience literature, which is a hot topic in tourism and related fields in recent years.

This study is very well-written and organized, thus requiring only a few minor checks/revisions.

1) please write a detailed explanation about how to select/identify the target studies.

 2) it might be much more interesting if the authors can identify/describe the rise or fall of the specific topics across the time span. in the current study, a total of 11 topics were identified. how about the trend of each of 11 topics?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

The topic of destination resilience is indeed among issues that are more and more commonly studied by scientists representing different areas of knowledge. The growing body of literature allows at the moment conducting of the first literature studies and bibliometric analysis. Definitely, the selection of the topic is justified properly. The bibliometric analysis is prepared well. Due to the high number of analyzed sources adding the table covering all sources is not necessary and desired. As usual, the selection of the database for such an analysis can be controversial, but the Authors know about this and present clear arguments as well as the limitations of their choice. The value of the paper is amended by attached figures presenting the results of their network and clustering analysis. If I should find some weaknesses of the paper, I would search for them in the conclusions. This part is rather short, but it contains the most expected statements in it.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

I believe that the topic is absolutely timely, not only, but especially considering the COVID-19 pandemic. The database used (WoS) is no doubt adequate. All research seems consistent, following a well-explained methodology. Results are shared, as well as some future hypotheses to continue this study. I am absolutely comfortable recommending this paper for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 4 Report

The article is interesting but I have a few suggestions for a better comprehension:

  • lines 89-90: review the phrase
  • A better explanation of the time span should be useful. 
  • The quality of figure 2 is poor. 
  • The discussion section includes new ideas whose origin is not clear, i.e. DPSIR.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop