Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong
Abstract
:1. Background
The Current Study
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measures
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sample Characteristics
3.2. Access to ICT and Frequency of Use
3.3. Relationship between Internet Usage, Digital Skills and Well-Being
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. World Report on Aging and Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 24 March 2023).
- Ma, Q.; Chan, A.H.; Teh, P.-L. Bridging the digital divide for older adults via observational training: Effects of model identity from a generational perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince Yenilmez, M. Economic and social consequences of population aging the dilemmas and opportunities in the twenty-first century. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2015, 10, 735–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruine de Bruin, W.; Parker, A.M.; Strough, J. Age differences in reported social networks and well-being. Psychol. Aging 2020, 35, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- An, S.; Jang, Y. The role of social capital in the relationship between physical constraint and mental distress in older adults: A latent interaction model. Aging Ment. Health 2018, 22, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hebblethwaite, S.; Young, L.; Martin Rubio, T. Pandemic precarity: Aging and social engagement. Leis. Sci. 2021, 43, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, G.J.; Webster, N.J.; Bynum, J.P. A framework for aging-friendly services and supports in the age of COVID-19. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2020, 32, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galenkamp, H.; Deeg, D.J. Increasing social participation of older people: Are there different barriers for those in poor health? Introduction to the special section. Eur. J. Ageing 2016, 13, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Hoof, J.; Kazak, J.K.; Perek-Białas, J.M.; Peek, S.T. The challenges of urban ageing: Making cities age-friendly in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boz, H.; Karatas, S.E. A review on internet use and quality of life of the elderly. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci. 2015, 10, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miskelly, F.G. Assistive technology in elderly care. Age Ageing 2001, 30, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Volkom, M.; Stapley, J.C.; Malter, J. Use and perception of technology: Sex and generational differences in a community sample. Educ. Gerontol. 2013, 39, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waycott, J.; Vetere, F.; Ozanne, E. Building social connections: A framework for enriching older adults’ social connectedness through information and communication technologies. In Ageing and Digital Technology: Designing and Evaluating Emerging Technologies for Older Adults; Neves, B.B., Vetere, F., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dijk, J.A. The Digital Divide, 1st ed.; Wiley: Newark, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Marimuthu, R.; Gupta, S.; Stapleton, L.; Duncan, D.; Pasik-Duncan, B. Challenging the Digital Divide: Factors Affecting the Availability, Adoption, and Acceptance of Future Technology in Elderly User Communities. Computer 2022, 55, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Dijk, J. The Network Society; Sage Publication: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Van Deursen, A.J.; Van Dijk, J.A. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 2019, 21, 354–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Scheerder, A.; Van Deursen, A.; Van Dijk, J. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 8, 1607–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goedhart, N.S.; Verdonk, P.; Dedding, C. “Never good enough”. A situated understanding of the impact of digitalization on citizens living in a low socioeconomic position. Policy Internet 2022, 14, 824–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, S.C.; Chou, T.C.; Huang, C.H. Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 179, 121607. [Google Scholar]
- Morris, A.; Brading, H. E-literacy and the grey digital divide: A review with recommendations. J. Inf. Lit. 2007, 1, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, K.R.; Rodrigues, L.; Pereira, L.; Busse, G.; Irbe, M.; Almada, M.; Christensen, C.; Midão, L.; Dias, I.; Heery, D.; et al. Improving the digital skills of older adults in a COVID-19 pandemic environment. Educ. Gerontol. 2021, 47, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hargittai, E.; Piper, A.M.; Morris, M.R. From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2019, 18, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ihm, J.; Hsieh, Y.P. The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2015, 18, 1123–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millard, A.; Baldassar, L.; Wilding, R. The significance of digital citizenship in the well-being of older migrants. Public Health 2018, 158, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofer, M.; Hargittai, E.; Büchi, M.; Seifert, A. Older adults’ online information seeking and subjective well-being: The moderating role of Internet skills. Int. J. Commun. 2019, 13, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heo, J.; Chun, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, J. Internet use and well-being in older adults. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2015, 18, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, E.H.; Walden, J.; Johnson, A.C.; Sundar, S.S. Social networking in the aging context: Why older adults use or avoid Facebook. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaja, J.D.; Charness, N.; Fisk, A.D. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 2006, 21, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tirado-Morueta, R.; Aguaded-Gómez, J.I.; Hernando-Gómez, Á. The socio-demographic divide in Internet usage moderated by digital literacy support. Technol. Soc. 2018, 55, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hargittai, E.; Dobransky, K. Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Can. J. Commun. 2017, 42, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oh, S.S.; Kim, K.A.; Kim, M.; Oh, J.; Chu, S.H.; Choi, J. Measurement of digital literacy among older adults: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e26145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudrie, J.; Pheeraphuttranghkoon, S.; Davari, S. The digital divide and older adult population adoption, use and diffusion of mobile phones: A quantitative study. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 3, 673–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, M.H.; Hunsaker, A.; Hargittai, E. Older adults’ online social engagement and social capital: The moderating role of Internet skills. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2022, 25, 942–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexopoulou, S. The portrait of older people as (non) users of digital technologies: A scoping literature review and a typology of digital older (non) users. Gerontechnology 2020, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tőkés, G.E. The Third-level Digital Divide among Elderly Hungarians in Romania. Acta Ethnogr. Hung. 2022, 66, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büchi, M.; Festic, N.; Latzer, M. How social well-being is affected by digital inequalities. Int. J. Commun. 2018, 12, 3686–3706. [Google Scholar]
- Seifert, A.; Reinwand, D.A.; Schlomann, A. Designing and using digital mental health interventions for older adults: Being aware of digital inequality. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Census and Statistics Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Summary Results of 2021 Population Census and Year-End Population Estimate for 2021. Available online: https://gia.info.gov.hk/general/202202/28/P2022022800462_388301_1_1646036905239.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2023).
- Census and Statistics Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Thematic Household Survey Report No. 69. Available online: https://www.ogcio.gov.hk/en/about_us/facts/doc/householdreport2020_69.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2023).
- Kwong, Y.H. Digital divide: Computer and internet use by elderly people in Hong Kong. Asian J. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 10, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Lam, S.; Chung, W. Understanding the need of mobile ICT learning as an elderly learning tool. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. IJET 2009, 4, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cotten, S.R.; Schuster, A.M.; Seifert, A. Social media use and well-being among older adults. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2022, 45, 101293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keränen, N.S.; Kangas, M.; Immonen, M.; Similä, H.; Enwald, H.; Korpelainen, R.; Jämsä, T. Use of information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: A population-based survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aggarwal, B.; Xiong, Q.; Schroeder-Butterfill, E. Impact of the use of the internet on quality of life in older adults: Review of literature. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2020, 21, e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Deursen, A.J.; Van Dijk, J.A.; Peter, M. Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telemat. Inform. 2015, 32, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lwin, M.O.; Panchapakesan, C.; Sheldenkar, A.; Calvert, G.A.; Lim, L.K.; Lu, J. Determinants of eHealth literacy among adults in China. J. Health Commun. 2020, 25, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhao, P.; Qiao, S. Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information. Transp. Policy 2020, 99, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Deursen, A.J.; Helsper, E.; Eynon, R.; Van Dijk, J.A. The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. Int. J. Commun. 2017, 11, 452–473. [Google Scholar]
- Roque, N.A.; Boot, W.R. A new tool for assessing mobile device proficiency in older adults: The mobile device proficiency questionnaire. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2018, 37, 131–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Champagne, K.; Boot, W.R. Exploring predictors of mobile device proficiency among older adults. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Contexts; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 10272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moret-Tatay, C.; Beneyto-Arrojo, M.J.; Gutierrez, E.; Boot, W.R.; Charness, N. A spanish adaptation of the computer and mobile device proficiency questionnaires (CPQ and MDPQ) for older adults. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, N.; Ho, H.C.; Wang, M.P.; Lai, A.Y.; Luk, T.T.; Viswanath, K.; Chan, S.S.; Lam, T.H. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Family Communication Scale in the Chinese population. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 736514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, F.; Jhajj, A.K.; Stewart, D.E.; Burghardt, M.; Bierman, A.S. Single item measures of self-rated mental health: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014, 14, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez-Zepeda, M.U.; Belanger, E.; Zunzunegui, M.V.; Phillips, S.; Ylli, A.; Guralnik, J. Assessing the validity of self-rated health with the short physical performance battery: A cross-sectional analysis of the international mobility in aging study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fung, H.W.; Chan, C.; Lee, C.Y.; Yau, C.K.M.; Chung, H.M.; Ross, C.A. Validity of a web-based measure of borderline personality disorder: A preliminary study. J. Evid.-Based Soc. Work 2020, 17, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Feng, L.; Qiu, J. Self-rated health of population in southern China: Association with socio-demographic characteristics measured with multiple-item self-rated health measurement scale. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katz, V.S.; Gonzalez, C. Toward meaningful connectivity: Using multilevel communication research to reframe digital inequality. J. Commun. 2016, 66, 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragnedda, M.; Ruiu, M. Social Capital and the Three Levels of Digital Divide; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Du, P. Gender, capital endowment and digital exclusion of older people in China. Ageing Soc. 2021, 41, 2502–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dijk, J.A. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society, 1st ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Van Dijk, J.A. Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 2006, 34, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stockwell, S.; Schofield, P.; Fisher, A.; Firth, J.; Jackson, S.E.; Stubbs, B.; Smith, L. Digital behavior change interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary behavior in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Gerontol. 2019, 120, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lythreatis, S.; Singh, S.K.; El-Kassar, A.-N. The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 175, 121359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Nam, S.I. Creating supportive environments and enhancing personal perception to bridge the digital divide among older adults. Educ. Gerontol. 2021, 47, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fung, K.-k.; Hung, S.S.-l.; Lai, D.W.L.; Shum, M.H.Y.; Fung, H.-w.; He, L. Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136208
Fung K-k, Hung SS-l, Lai DWL, Shum MHY, Fung H-w, He L. Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(13):6208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136208
Chicago/Turabian StyleFung, Kwok-kin, Shirley Suet-lin Hung, Daniel W. L. Lai, Michelle H. Y. Shum, Hong-wang Fung, and Langjie He. 2023. "Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 13: 6208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136208
APA StyleFung, K. -k., Hung, S. S. -l., Lai, D. W. L., Shum, M. H. Y., Fung, H. -w., & He, L. (2023). Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(13), 6208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136208