The Role and Function of Autobiographical Memory Narratives during the Emotional Processing of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Empirically-Derived Memory Coding System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Breast Cancer Experience in Young Age: The Psychological Impact
1.2. The Role of Narrative and Autobiographical Memory in Critical Experience
1.3. Autobiographical Memory Narrative and Breast Cancer Experience
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants and Recruitment
- eligibility criteria were first admission to the hospital before the age of 50 and a diagnosis of infiltrating ductal BC;
- exclusion criteria were metastatic disease (stage IV), neoadjuvant therapy, and psychotherapeutic treatment in progress.
2.2. Ethical Approval
2.3. Procedure and Longitudinal Recruitment
2.4. EPS: Emotional Processing Scale
2.5. Narrative Ad Hoc in Deep Interview
3. Data Analysis
A Step by Step Empirically-Derived Procedure
- Data Reduction and Translation
- 2.
- Development of a Memory Coding Manual System
4. Results
4.1. Dividing the Emotion Coping/Profiles
4.2. Validating the Emotion Coping/Processing Profiles
4.3. Summary of the Findings
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Clinical Implications
Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Breast Cancer Survivors’ Autobiographical Memory Narratives Coding Manual
- Degree of Agency Experienced—As past experiences are described, what is the ultimate attitude of the participant toward the outcome and their ability to have an effect or influence on that outcome?Since there are four interviews for each participant, the coding sheet should reflect a score for each interview and then a total score. If the participant failed to answer a prompt, then this should be noted and they should be removed from any analyses that aggregate across that prompt. For participants who answered all four interview prompts, their scores can range from a total of 4–12.
- Memory Reflects Sense of Passivity and Helplessness in Face of Destiny (Score of 1)
- Participant uses words like: “helpless, powerless, paralyzed, lost, out of my control”; “how do you fight it?”; “what do you do?”; “I was lost”; “you are missing out on something”; “you don’t have the power to decide about anything”; “it is others who decide for you”; “you just have to stay and wait”; “I don’t feel strong”; “it all went wrong”; “it did not strengthen me”; “I didn’t feel in control of my body”; “it was difficult to recover”; “it is chaos”.
- Participant indicates: “this is God’s will”; “this is my fate”; “I am a victim of bad luck”; “why me?”; “a sense of resignation”; “bad luck”; “sometimes you wonder why?”; “the disease has put me up against the uncontrollable”.
- 2.
- Memory Reflects a Degree of Uncertainty but Commitment to Endure (Score of 2)
- Participant uses words like: “I will survive”; “it won’t be easy”; “I have to hope for the best”; “I dodged a bullet”; “my faith has given me the strength to survive”; “I am coping with life a little better”; “uou continue on”; “you do the best that you can”.
- 3.
- Memory Reflects Strength and Confidence about Outcome (Score of 3)
- Participant uses words like: “I will be strong”; “I will go forward”; “I will win this battle”; “I will not let this get me down”; “I can handle this”; “you fight through it”; “I won’t give up”; “I overcame it”; “I dealt with it well”; “I am optimistic”; “I try to be confident”; “I have tried to be strong”; “I mobilized. I tried to do my best” (NOTE—the difference between hoping for the best and doing one’s best); “I was not as strong (as I am now)—I suffered more”; “I am overcoming too”; “I find courage within and keep moving forward”; “I have overcome multiple challenges”; “trust and optimism”; “in every case I have dealt with them”.
- II.
- Expression of Negative Emotion and Efforts at Regulation—(Two Codes)
- Mention of Emotion: “pain” (in psychological sense); “suffering”; “the loss is felt”; “concern”; “traumatic”; “scares me”; “you will be broken and makes me emotional”; “hit me hard”; “most difficult blow”; “when someone is bereaved, this is how I feel”; “anxiety”; “guilt”; “feel bad”; “shaken”; “makes me feel bad”; “struggle”; “carry this weight inside me”; “fear”; “crying”; “nervous”; “hurt”; “depression”; “afraid”; “terrified”; “feeling of fear”; “feeling like the earth had been pulled out from under me”; “devastating”; ”stressed”; “tough”; “bitter”; “angry”.
- 2.
- Emotion Regulation: for this coding, you should give one overall score for each interview phase. What is the overall sense of emotion regulation for that particular set of responses to the prompt for that phase? This means that each interview phase should be coded as one of the four categories below. If there seems to be evidence of more than one in the same interview phase, choose the one that seems the most dominant among the competing responses. Over the four interviews, the emotion regulation approach that is most frequently used could be considered the “dominant” approach for that individual.
- Acceptance/Resignation—“resigned”; “you have to just stay and wait”; “have accepted it but with so many consequences”; “you continue on without remorse, regrets; “without giving you any power to take action but to trust your doctors”.
- Distraction-Denial—“trying to forget it”; “try to cut yourself off from emotions”; “remove yourself”; “not feel them”; “detach myself from things”; “try not thinking about them”; “trying to distract myself”; “don’t like feeling sorry for myself”; “I don’t remember anything”.
- Difficulty Coping—“most difficult blow”; “sense of helplessness”; “cannot speak about it”; “reliving emotions”; “traumatized” (different than “traumatic”); “never resigned”; “I cannot do it”; “could not successfully react”; “feel dazed”; “it is more heavy”.
- Coping—“attending a group”; “coping better”; “you cannot break down”; “optimism, tranquility and trusting your doctors (different from mere acceptance because of the state of optimism and tranquility).
- III
- Interpersonal Relations—Degree of Engagement and Support—Does the participant mention receiving or offering support to family and/or friends? Does the participant explicitly express distancing or hiding their illness from others? Does the participant express trust and faith in others (e.g., doctors and health providers), including faith in God? In this case, each phase can be coded for as many of these responses to interpersonal relations that seem to be present (this refers to the first five below). After coding all four phases, the interpersonal response that seems most prevalent can be noted as the “dominant overall interpersonal relations response.” For the sixth item, “Family illness and loss,” it should simply be noted if this is mentioned in each phase and what kind (e.g., mother, father, sibling, child, aunt, etc.).
- Receiving Support: “my loved ones have all helped me”.
- Giving Support: “I have tried to help whomever in my family”; “worrying and caring for children”; “many daily tasks you have to take care of”; “you fight for your children”; “protection you have for your daughter”; “I have to stay here with my daughters”; “I was responsible for my father”; “I never left him alone”; “you cannot break down and must keep your strength up for your family”; “when you assist someone else it is more difficult”; “always found strength for myself and others”; “I have to go and get my son”.
- Distancing and Self-Reliance: “defend my children and not let them see me cry”; “not let others see my suffering”; “didn’t want to talk about things with others”; “I don’t have anybody and I don’t feel like begging for attention”; “I face it alone”; “I am very self-reliant”; “I have earned everything I have”.
- Expressing Trust and Faith in Others and/or God: “my faith has given me the strength to survive’; “putting trust in a person, a doctor, a team that follows your case”.
- Distress Caused by Negative Family and/or Other Interactions: “as a daughter, I cannot count on her”; “mother’s depression”; “daughter turned her back on her”; “daughter hurting her”; “being taken away from mother”; “not with my husband any more”; “problems with my father”; “hospital wasn’t very helpful”; “doctor had wrong diagnosis”.
- Family Illness and Loss: “mother’s illness”; “loss of a newborn”; “I was close to my father and watched him die”; “we were left without a mother”; “brother was murdered”; “miscarriage”; “family unit—whole series of diseases”; “brother was unwell”; “father was in poor health”; “when my mom was unwell, fear of losing her was great”; “lost my father when I was 10”; “sisters had it; one did not make it”; “lost our mother when I was 10”; “lost the baby”; “I was five years old when my mother died”; “mother-in-law had tumor”.
Appendix B
Coping Profiles |
ID 1—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID1 primarily displays an agentic focus that emphasizes moving forward and overcoming adversity (ex. “confident in myself, sure of my strength, of my character, I keep pushing forwards”), regulates emotions effectively (ex. “You just have to fight through it and keep moving forward”), and interpersonal interactions that dominantly give support (ex. “I have always tried to help whoever in my family was dealing with it”). ID1 undergoes a change from passivity to overcoming across the first three phases (see a change in language from “we will see” to “and so you continue forwards”), in addition to a change in emotional regulation style from resigned to effectively coping (see a change in language from “my turn has arrived” and “sense of resignation” to “confident in myself, sure of my strength, of my character, I keep pushing forwards”). However, there is no displayed change in the dominant style of interpersonal relations: it remains giving support throughout the first three phases. |
Overall emphasis on giving to others. Sense of maturity, composed. |
ID 2—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID2 initially shows us a positive sense of agency in phase 1 (ex. “I am optimistic (with my own cancer)”), but quickly gives way to an all-encompassing sense of passivity and helplessness which dominates the remainder of the interview (ex. “I felt like things were going crazy, because this was the only time that I have been truly, truly, truly… how do you say it… powerless to do anything… to change the situation. That was the only time I was truly lost. Indeed, you could say that I was more lost then than I am now!”). They struggle to regulate their negative emotions (ex. “how do you fight it? What do you do? What do you know? It’s difficult.”) and both give help and receive help (ex. When you have children, you find yourself in situations which you… you wouldn’t want, but you fight for them, you understand?” and “But (my loved ones) have all helped me, my niece, my daughter, they manage to get through to you” respectively). We see no change in their style of emotional regulation; they consistently struggle to deal with negative emotions, and we only see their aforementioned change in sense of agency. |
Overall struggles to deal with past and current trauma, but shows initial strength. The experience shifts them to a greater sense of resignation. |
ID 3—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID 3 shows us a sense of agency that is dominantly passive (ex. “you have to just stay and wait… it is others who decide for you, you don’t have the power to decide about anything.”), dominantly displays a sense of resignation (ex. you face it but there is not much you can do), and experiences distress from many interpersonal interactions (ex. “Of course I didn’t have many points of reference (for how to cope with/address it), she is a weak and sick person and you accept it for what it is. But as a daughter I cannot count on her”). They display changes from phases 1 to 3 in agency and emotional regulation (see changes in language from “how is it possible that yesterday we were all alright, I was fine then, and now this happened” to “I have had to be strong and continue forwards” and from “how is it possible that yesterday we were all alright, I was fine then, and now this happened” to “you face it but there is not much you can do”). |
Displays a commitment to endure in the face of adversity, despite its weight. Throughout all phases they display tension about agency, vacillating between a sense of powerlessness and a stoic commitment to endure and manage her adversity. |
ID 6—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID6 shows an unchanging dominant sense of passivity and helplessness (ex. “ It has created so much suffering for me, and therefore (affected) my choices a bit”) and an emotional regulation style that starts resigned (ex. “I say “death is a part of life, why didn’t I just accept it?” I mean, I have accepted it but with so many consequences”) before moving to struggling (ex. “Like I already said there is the time in which I faced my mother’s illness, I cannot speak about it unfortunately”.). They have a dominant interpersonal relations style that changes from distancing (ex. “I showed myself to be very… let’s say I was “strong”) to giving (ex. “I went through the whole process with her from start to finish”). |
ID 6 shows an ongoing struggle to leave behind past trauma. |
ID 7—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID7 displays an unchanging agentic focus on endurance (ex. I try to be… confident that I can get through this, I don’t care if they have to take my breasts or if they do chemo to me, but I still want to be close to my children, and that’s all”) and an unchanging sense of distancing in regards to interpersonal relations (ex. Have tried to be strong and to not let others see my suffering”). They display an emotional regulation strategy that shifts from effectively coping to struggling (see a change in language from “I confronted (his diagnosis) with so much strength” to “I say this because my father wasn’t a talker and he didn’t say anything, he suffered in silence like I do”). |
There is an emphasis on carrying weight alone and hiding pain inside. |
ID 9—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID9 initially displays an initial agentic focus on endurance (ex. “Anyway you deal with it, the fear goes away”), but gives way to a dominant tendency towards passivity and helplessness (ex. “I have always been afraid of having to miss out on the (lives of) my two little girls, and it is all like a chain”) They also display an unchanging struggle to regulate negative emotions (see “and so there’s just so much fear, the predominant adjective for me is fear”). In addition, ID9 is primarily a giving person, and shows a deep commitment to their daughters (ex. “My mother was 40 years old when she died, and I will never do that to (my kids), I will never meet the same end”). |
An emphasis on caring for their children coupled with an overwhelming fear to leave them behind. |
ID 10—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID10 displays an unchanging passive and helpless nature (ex. “Eh I find myself today as someone who is nervous, I grind my teeth during the night and… I am not the same as I was before, I have changed”), an unchanging tendency to struggle with negative emotions (ex. “This is the strongest pain of my life…”), and an unchanging dominant interpersonal relations style of interaction distress (ex. “She does not give me the joy of living, the joy of living with this small grandson of mine, or with her (the granddaughter). Why do you have to be so mean? What have I done to you?”). |
Painful anecdotes are used to communicate the trouble that ID10 is having coping with the experience of cancer. |
ID 13—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID13 displays an agentic focus on endurance (ex. At “first it was not easy, it was very hard, you do not expect your world to fall apart. I was already going to church (before this), but now I am attending a group and I am coping with life a bit better”), an unchanging emotional regulation strategy of denial (ex. “In my personal life… no. I don’t feel like… I don’t want to talk about it”), and an interpersonal relations style of faith in others and/or God (ex. “My faith has guided me… my faith has given me the strength to survive.”). |
There is an emphasis on faith and a reluctance to confront, speak about, or recall specific painful experiences. |
ID 15—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID15 possesses a sense of agency that is primarily passive and helpless (ex. “So in this case I was angry because I didn’t feel in control of my body”), but it changes to that from enduring (ex. “You continue on, without remorse, regrets, without much drama, that perhaps this is not the most serious thing”). They display an emotional regulation strategy that changes from resignation (ex. “I experienced it as a thing that just happened”) to become dominantly struggling (ex. “It was difficult to recover. In this case I became huge, and I found that even then I could not successfully react”). In addition, they display an interpersonal relations style that is defined by interaction distress (ex. “The return to work was incredibly difficult, as you are no longer considered a woman, but a mother.”), but that began as distancing. |
Their experience is defined by a feeling of lack of control, and a sense that their efforts of denial are ineffective. |
ID 16—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID16’s sense of agency is dominantly passive and helpless, and it does not change (ex. “When the phone rang, I was always filled with anxiety, because I was afraid that it would be the hospital calling with bad news, as it was such a precarious situation”). Their emotional regulation strategy is dominantly distraction and denial (ex. “I tried to not… to not think, that is how I am”), but over time she struggles to maintain her efforts at distancing and denial (ex. “Ultimately I feel dazed when I engage with these thoughts, and my mind wanders and it is chaos”). Her dominant style of interpersonal relations is distancing (ex. “Let’s say that I was always making myself strong, because my whole family was always busy”). |
There is an emphasis on distancing herself from her painful experiences. |
ID 17—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID17 displays a sense of agency that is initially overcoming (ex. “I had a bit of a feeling like the earth had been pulled out from beneath my feet when… when he started to get sick, and then when he was gone… but fortunately, he gave the basics (life skills/insight) both to me, and to my sister, so that we could grow up”), and changes from this (ex. “I basically was responsible for it, because my mother wasn’t capable of it, and my sister is a little further away from these things, and so I took care of it, I tried to take this all on”) to passivity and helplessness (ex. “He did not have this same disease but anyways, essentially, he suffered greatly in his final phase of life, and I experienced (anxiety) very intensely in that period, similar to how I feel in this one”). It crosses the gamut of agency scores. They struggle regulating negative emotions (ex. “I never left him alone, I spent every night with him; it was a long and heavy journey”), but they initially displayed strength in the face of these emotions (ex. “Eh, as it came, day by day, I centered myself around the things that I had to do for him, I mobilized, I tried to do my best”). They display an interpersonal regulations style that is dominantly and firmly about giving to others (ex. “I was very close to my father, throughout the entirety of his illness”). |
There is a huge emphasis on taking care of others, and growing in the face of trials and tribulations. |
ID 22—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID22 displays an agency that is initially passive and helpless in nature (ex. “There was a somewhat long period in which we found ourselves alone, me and both my brother and my sister”), but over time becomes more focused on strength and overcoming adversity (ex. “When the experience is yours personally, you manage to not lose strength”). In addition, she displays a coping strategy that is initially struggling (ex. “I have endured bad things but they could be resolved, I was the one who couldn’t understand”) but shifts to focus on marshaling her strength (ex. “When you are experiencing it on your own skin you can be stronger”), and an interpersonal relations style that is dominantly giving (ex. “But when you assist someone else who is sick it is more difficult”). |
Over the four phases, there is a developing emphasis on keeping up her strength and not placing a burden on others. She is hardened by her prior experiences with illness in her family. |
ID 24—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID 24 displays an agency that shifts from enduring (ex. “Eh… with patience, you just keep moving forwards, unfortunately I couldn’t do anything about it, it is not the kind of thing that can be cured or operated on”) to passivity and helplessness (ex. “In contrast, this has been much more heavy, not so much with the surgery but with radiation, because I experience burning, fatigue, heaviness, everything… it burns, it hurts, and everything goes black”), but is ultimately dominantly overcoming in nature (ex. “And now, I am overcoming it too”). In addition, she ultimately shows that she can effectively cope with negative emotions (ex. “And now, I am overcoming it too”), but she begins as resigned (ex. “There is nothing to operate on, so there is really nothing that I could do”) and overtime shifts to struggling (ex. “No, no, no. No other experience. This has been so much more… serious”). Her dominant interpersonal relations style is faith in others or God (ex. “I went to the day hospital, they did it and then sent me home. I am always going to check how it is, and they say that it’s all fine”). |
Over time she learns to cope with the difficult experience, and sees herself overcoming the difficulty. |
ID 29—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID 29 shows an agentic focus on endurance (ex. “Your world falls apart a bit, you feel that the years go by, though you always hope that things will go well even if it was not a good experience”) but one that shifts to an overcoming nature over time (ex. “I give myself courage, and I go on because that’s the way life is”). She effectively copes with negative emotions (ex. “I have always found strength for myself and others”), and in terms of interpersonal relations, she distances herself from others (ex. “I don’t have anybody and therefore I don’t feel like begging for attention”). |
There is an overwhelming sense of individual strength, she is getting through cancer by herself. There is an emphasis on stoicism. |
ID 31—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID 31 displays an agency that shifts from passivity and helplessness (ex. “In the meantime as I was waiting for the results”) to overcoming in nature (ex. “I have overcome multiple challenges in life”), but that is ultimately dominantly enduring (ex. “I have overcome so many challenges in my life, but these were manageable challenges overall… graduation, work… These were things in my power. In contrast, this disease has put me up against the uncontrollable, something that possesses you without giving you any power to take action, other than trusting my doctors and being a patient”). She displays an emotional regulation style that shifts from struggling (ex. “I lost so much weight because I was working so many shifts, even at night, and I was so thin and so stressed”) to effectively coping (ex. “I have earned all that I have, I have had other challenges and for better or for worse I have always managed to overcome them”), but that settles as resigned in its nature in phase 4 (ex. “Something that possesses you without giving you any power to take action”). Finally, her interpersonal relations style is defined by interaction distress (ex. “But she said this very calmly, like how I am talking now… she just threw these things in my face”). |
There is a struggle here to trust others because of past negative interactions with medical personnel. Although she perceives herself as strong and agentic, the disease creates passivity. |
ID 39—Red (Less Healthy Coping) |
ID 39 may have blocked painful memories. She alludes to tough times with the death of her mother, but never elaborates. In addition, she says she does not remember anything (ex. “No, fortunately… with my mother I was so young (when she died) that I don’t remember anything. I was 5 years old when she died and I don’t remember anything”). |
An emphasis on denial and distraction with regards to emotional regulation. |
ID 50—Blue (Healthy Coping) |
ID 50 displays an unchanging enduring sense of agency, and an emotional regulation strategy that is dominantly effectively coping (ex. “Well, with optimism, with the tranquility and optimism that is needed, of course, it is necessary, and then by trusting the doctors… and (those) who are working for you, that is very important, isn’t it?”). However, it shifts over time to distraction and denial in phase 3. In addition, she displays an interpersonal relations style that is dominated by expressing faith (ex. “Anyways, putting trust in a person, in a doctor, in a team that follows your case. And so (you trust that)…they combine the various things and then, they take the right…the right direction”). |
The difficulty of confronting the cancer closes her off in phases 2 and 3, but she does express vulnerability again in phase 4. |
Blue Code—healthier emotional processing and coping (seven participants) |
Red Code—more problematic emotional processing and coping (10 participants) |
References
- Martino, M.L.; Lemmo, D.; Gargiulo, A. A review of psychological impact of breast cancer in women below 50 years old. Health Care Women Int. 2021, 42, 1066–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Margherita, G.; Martino, M.L.; Recano, F.; Camera, F. Invented fairy tales in groups with onco-haematological children. Child Care Health Dev. 2014, 40, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemmo, D.; Martino, M.L.; Nunziante Cesàro, A.; Solbakk, J.H. Idiosyncratic ambivalence: A three-dimensional interpretative model to understand the non-adhesion of women to breast and cervical cancer screening. Mediterr. J. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 8, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Martino, M.L.; Lemmo, D.; Gargiulo, A.; Barberio, D.; Abate, V.; Avino, F.; Freda, M.F. Changes of narrative meaning-making markers during the different phases of breast cancer treatment for women below 50 years old. Health Psychol. Rep. 2022, 10, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martino, M.L.; Lemmo, D.; Gargiulo, A.; Barberio, D.; Abate, V.; Avino, F.; Freda, M.F. Processing breast cancer experience in underfifty women: Longitudinal trajectories of narrative sense making functions. J. Constr. Psychol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martino, M.; Gargiulo, A.; Lemmo, D.; Margherita, G. Cancer blog narratives: The experience of under-fifty women with breast cancer during different times after diagnosis. Qual. Rep. 2019, 24, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martino, M.L.; Lemmo, D.; Gargiulo, A.; Barberio, D.; Abate, V.; Avino, F.; Tortoriello, R. Underfifty Women and Breast Cancer: Narrative Markers of Meaning-Making in Traumatic Experience. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martino, M.L.; De Luca Picione, R.; Lemmo, D.; Boursier, V.; Freda, M.F. Meaning-Making Trajectories of Resilience in Narratives of Adolescents with Multiple Sclerosis. Mediterr. J. Clin. Psychol. 2019, 7, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martino, M.L.; Gargiulo, A.; Lemmo, D.; Dolce, P.; Barberio, D.; Abate, V.; Avino, F.; Tortriello, R. Longitudinal effect of emotional processing on psychological symptoms in women under 50 with breast cancer. Health Psychol. Open 2019, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurevich, M.; Devins, G.M.; Rodin, G.M. Stress Response Syndromes and Cancer: Conceptual and Assessment Issues. Psychosomatics 2002, 43, 259–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martino, M.L.; Freda, M.F. Meaning-Making Process Related to Temporality During Breast Cancer Traumatic Experience: The Clinical Use of Narrative to Promote a New Continuity of Life. Eur. J. Psychol. 2016, 12, 622–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quattropani, M.C.; Lenzo, V.; Armieri, V.; Filastro, A. The origin of depression in Alzheimer disease: A systematic review. Riv. Psichiatr. 2018, 53, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
- Neimeyer, R.A. Complicated grief and the quest for meaning: A constructivist contribution. OMEGA J. Death Dying 2006, 52, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Luca Picione, R.; Valsiner, J. Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: Liminality of narrative processes. Eur. J. Psychol. 2017, 13, 532–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salvatore, S.; Freda, M.F. Affect, unconscious and sensemaking. A psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas Psychol. 2011, 29, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valsiner, J. Processes structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Hum. Dev. 2001, 44, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freda, M.F.; Lemmo, D.; Auriemma, E.; Picione, R.D.L.; Martino, M.L. From sense to meaning: Narrative Function Coding System for the experience of illness. Qual. Res. J. 2022; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
- Horowitz, M.J. Stress-response syndromes. In International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes; Wilson, J.P., Raphael, B., Eds.; The Plenum Series on Stress and Coping; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1993; pp. 49–60. [Google Scholar]
- Janoff-Bulman, R. Posttraumatic Growth: Three Explanatory Models. Psychol. Inq. 2004, 15, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Joseph, S.; Linley, A.P. Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2005, 9, 262–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, A.W. Just listening: Narrative and deep illness. Fam. Syst. Health 1998, 16, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, D.M.; Elverdam, B. Cancer survivor’s experience of time- time disruption and time appropriation. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 57, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjelmblink, F.; Holmstrom, I. To cope with uncertainty: Stroke patients’ use of temporal models in narratives. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2006, 20, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca Picione, R.; Martino, M.L.; Freda, M.F. Understanding cancer patients’ narratives: Meaning-making process, temporality, and modal articulation. J. Constr. Psychol. 2017, 30, 339–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brockmeier, J. Autobiographical time. Narrat. Inq. 2000, 10, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, E.M. Risky business: Medical discourse, breast cancer, and narrative. Qual. Health Res. 2008, 18, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.L. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 257–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blagov, P.S.; Singer, J.A.; Oost, K.M.; Goodman, J.A. Self-defining memories—Narrative Features in relation to adaptive and maladaptive personality traits (Replication and extension of Blagov & Singer, 2004). J. Personal. 2022, 90, 457–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAdams, D.P. Personal narratives and the life story. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research; John, O.P., Robins, R., Pervin, L.A., Eds.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 242–262. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, K.; Fivush, R. The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 111, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fivush, R.; Nelson, K. Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pals, J.L.; McAdams, D.P. The transformed self: A narrative understanding of posttraumatic growth. Psychol. Inq. 2004, 15, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
- Pascuzzi, D.; Smorti, A. Emotion regulation, autobiographical memories and life narratives. New Ideas Psychol. 2017, 45, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, K.; Fivush, R. The development of autobiographical memory, autobiographical narratives, and autobiographical consciousness. Psychol. Rep. 2020, 123, 71–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blagov, P.S.; Singer, J.A. Four dimensions of self-defining memories (specificity, meaning, content, and affect) and their relationships to self-restraint, distress, and repressive defensiveness. J. Personal. 2004, 72, 481–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singer, J.A.; Blagov, P. The Integrative Function of Narrative Processing: Autobiographical Memory, Self-Defining Memories, and the Life Story of Identity. In The Self and Memory; Beike, D.R., Lampinen, J.M., Behrend, D.A., Eds.; Psychology Press: New York City, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, J.A.; Blagov, P. Self-defining memories, narrative identity, and psychotherapy. In The Handbook of Narrative and Psychotherapy: Practice, Theory and Research; Sage Pub.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004; Volume 229. [Google Scholar]
- Conway, M.A.; Pleydell-Pearce, C.W. The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychol. Rev. 2000, 107, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, S.B.; Lax, M.L. The unanticipated resilience of trait self-knowledge in the face of neural damage. Memory 2010, 18, 918–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluck, S. Autobiographical memory: Exploring its functions in everyday life. Memory 2003, 11, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluck, S.; Habermas, T. The life story schema. Motiv. Emot. 2000, 24, 121–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singer, J.A.; Blagov, P.; Berry, M.; Oost, K.M. Self-defining memories, scripts, and the life story: Narrative identity in personality and psychotherapy. J. Personal. 2013, 81, 569–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singer, J.A.; Bonalume, L. Autobiographical memory narratives in psychotherapy: A coding system applied to the case of Cynthia. Pragmatic Case Stud. Psychother. 2010, 6, 134–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fivush, R.; Habermas, T.; Waters, T.E.; Zaman, W. The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives and identity. Int. J. Psychol. 2011, 46, 321–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fivush, R.; Haden, C.; Reese, E. The development of autobiographical memory. In Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory; Rubin, D.C., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Reese, E.; Haden, C.A.; Baker-Ward, L.; Bauer, P.; Fivush, R.; Ornstein, P.A. Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. J. Cogn. Dev. 2011, 12, 424–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fivush, R.; Bohanek, J.G.; Zaman, W. Personal and intergenerational narratives in relation to adolescents’ well-being. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2011, 131, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, K.C.; Pasupathi, M.; Pals, J.L. Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 11, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pasupathi, M.; Mansour, E.; Brubaker, J.R. Developing a life story: Constructing relations between self and experience in autobiographical narratives. Hum. Dev. 2007, 50, 85–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasupathi, M. Telling and the remembered self: Linguistic differences in memories for previously disclosed and previously undisclosed events. Memory 2007, 15, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thoman, D.B.; Sansone, C.; Pasupathi, M. Talking about interest: Exploring the role of social interaction for regulating motivation and the interest experience. J. Happiness Stud. 2007, 8, 335–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasupathi, M.; Alderman, K.; Shaw, D. Talking the talk: Collaborative remembering and self-perceived expertise. Discourse Process. 2007, 43, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singer, J.A.; Conway, M.A. Reconsidering therapeutic action: Loewald, cognitive neuroscience and the integration of memory’s duality. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2011, 92, 1183–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, K.C.; Thorne, A. Late adolescents’ self-defining memories about relationships. Dev. Psychol. 2003, 39, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thorne, A.; McLean, K.C. Telling traumatic events in adolescence: A study of master narrative positioning. In Connecting Culture and Memory: The Development of an Autobiographical Self; Psychology Press: New York City, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 169–185. [Google Scholar]
- Nieto, M.; Navarro-Bravo, B.; Moreno, B.; Ocana, A.; Serrano, J.P.; Gras, C.B.; Latorre, J.M. Functioning of autobiographical memory specificity and self-defining memories in people with cancer diagnosis. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kangas, M.; Henry, J.L.; Bryant, R.A. Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer: A conceptual and empirical review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 22, 499–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van’t Spijker, A.; Trijsburg, R.W.; Duivenvoorden, H.J. Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: A meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom. Med. 1997, 59, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tjemsland, L.; Søreide, J.A.; Matre, R.; Malt, U.F. Properative psychological variables predict immunological status in patients with operable breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. J. Psychol. Soc. Behav. Dimens. Cancer 1997, 6, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson-Ihrfelt, E.; Fjällskog, M.L.; Blomqvist, C.; Ahlgren, J.; Edlund, P.; Hansen, J.; Andersson, G. Breast cancer on the Internet: The quality of Swedish breast cancer websites. Breast 2004, 13, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nilsson-Ihrfelt, E.; Fjällskog, M.L.; Liss, A.; Jakobsson, O.; Blomqvist, C.; Andersson, G. Autobiographical memories in patients treated for breast cancer. J. Psychosom. Res. 2004, 57, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, S.A.; Zoellner, L.A. Overgeneral autobiographical memory and traumatic events: An evaluative review. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morel, N.; Dayan, J.; Piolino, P.; Viard, A.; Allouache, D.; Noal, S.; Giffard, B. Emotional specificities of autobiographical memory after breast cancer diagnosis. Conscious. Cogn. 2015, 35, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebri, V.; Triberti, S.; Pravettoni, G. Injured self: Autobiographical memory, self-concept, and mental health risk in breast cancer survivors. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 607514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novakova, B.; Howlett, S.; Baker, R.; Reuber, M. Emotion processing and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A cross-sectional comparison of patients and healthy controls. Seizure 2015, 29, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Luca Picione, R.; Martino, M.L.; Freda, M.F. Modal articulation: The psychological and semiotic functions of modalities in the sensemaking process. Theory Psychol. 2018, 28, 84–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Id | Age | Educational Level | Job Position | Marital Status | Number of Children | Age of Children |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 48 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 2 | 23; 16 |
2 | 45 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 2 | 20; 9 |
3 | 39 | High school | Housewife | Married | 1 | 7 |
6 | 45 | High school | Employee | Single | 0 | 0 |
7 | 49 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 1 | 25 |
9 | 36 | High school | Employee | Married | 1 | 8 |
10 | 46 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 2 | 32; 26 |
13 | 47 | Elementary/secondary | Freelance | Married | 2 | 21; 11 |
15 | 49 | Elementary/secondary | Freelance | Married | 1 | 11 |
16 | 44 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 3 | 15; 13; 9 |
17 | 41 | High school | Employee | Single | 2 | 4; 2 |
22 | 42 | Elementary/secondary | Employee | Single | 3 | 22; 20; 18 |
24 | 48 | Elementary/secondary | Housewife | Married | 2 | 19; 14 |
29 | 46 | High school | Housewife | Single | 0 | 0 |
31 | 48 | Degree | Employee | Married | 2 | 11; 13 |
39 | 44 | High school | Employee | Separated | 1 | 22 |
50 | 39 | High school | Employee | Married | 1 | 9 |
Agency | The degree to which the participants felt they could make an active response or have any sense of control in response to their diagnosis, disease process, and treatment. |
Emotion Regulation | Encompassed their range of coping responses at each phase of their cancer diagnosis and treatment; these responses included acceptance; distraction/denial; distress/hopelessness; and active positive coping. |
Interpersonal Relations | Included accepting support; supporting others; distancing/self-reliance; expressing trust/faith in a greater power, whether God or the medical team; and interpersonal distress caused by negative family and/or other interactions. |
Divided by Less Healthy and More Coping Styles Based on Memory Coding | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Less healthy | More healthy | |||
Coping group | Coping group | |||
(n = 10) | (n = 7) | |||
Phase 1 | Phase 3 | Phase 1 | Phase 3 | |
Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | |
Suppression | 4.27 (2.17) | 6.20 (2.61) | 5.54 (1.94) | 4.20 (2.98) |
Unprocessed | 4.94 (2.79) | 5.80 (1.75) | 3.83 (2.72) | 2.56 (2.00) |
Controllability | 3.21 (2.46) | 4.53 (1.96) | 1.37 (1.24) | 2.16 (1.62) |
Avoidance | 4.58 (2.96) | 5.20 (2.32) | 4.06 (1.26) | 4.68 (2.82) |
Experience | 3.81 (1.62) | 3.91 (1.92) | 3.33 (1.70) | 3.12 (2.21) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Martino, M.L.; Lemmo, D.; Moylan, J.; Stevenson, C.; Bonalume, L.; Freda, M.F.; Singer, J.A. The Role and Function of Autobiographical Memory Narratives during the Emotional Processing of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Empirically-Derived Memory Coding System. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021492
Martino ML, Lemmo D, Moylan J, Stevenson C, Bonalume L, Freda MF, Singer JA. The Role and Function of Autobiographical Memory Narratives during the Emotional Processing of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Empirically-Derived Memory Coding System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(2):1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021492
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartino, Maria Luisa, Daniela Lemmo, Joshua Moylan, Caroline Stevenson, Laura Bonalume, Maria Francesca Freda, and Jefferson A. Singer. 2023. "The Role and Function of Autobiographical Memory Narratives during the Emotional Processing of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Empirically-Derived Memory Coding System" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 2: 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021492
APA StyleMartino, M. L., Lemmo, D., Moylan, J., Stevenson, C., Bonalume, L., Freda, M. F., & Singer, J. A. (2023). The Role and Function of Autobiographical Memory Narratives during the Emotional Processing of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Empirically-Derived Memory Coding System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021492