Next Article in Journal
Association between Prevention from Going Out and Incidence of Falls among Community-Dwelling Older Adults during COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Establishing Self-Harm Registers: The Role of Process Mapping to Improve Quality of Surveillance Data Globally
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Resilience Scale in Portuguese Adults under Assisted Reproductive Techniques
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Types and Characteristics of Stress Coping in Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment in Korea

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032648
by Yumi Choi 1 and So-Hyun Moon 2,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032648
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Causes and Psychological Impact of Infertility)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors 

Infertility is defined by the World Health Organization as the inability to conceive after one year or more in couples with regular sexual activity.

Women have higher rates of anxiety levels associated with infertility. Report infertility as one of the most stressful experiences in their life. 

Therefore, the paper address a very important topic for women's health.

This study aimed to identify the types and characteristics of coping with infertility - related stress among women with infertility. 

The topic is correctly introduced, methods well characterized and the results are clearly presented.

It was a pleasure to read this manuscript.

With best and warmest regards,

 

Author Response

Thank you for your review.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well-desinged and implemented research. I would like to highlight some issues to improve:

- The information about the reliability of each questionnaire ( Cronbach´s data) should be in Results instead of Materials and methods.

- 2.5.3 There are 3 paragraphs with coments about the manuscript. Please, review. 

- 3.1 When giving the general information about the participants, authors only talk about being married. Were there single or divorced participants?

- Line 228-229 The idea is not understood. Review.

- Table 5: Review the title format.

- Line 501 Comments on the manuscript. Review

- Discussion: the presentation of the clusters could be improved. It is confusing. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment"

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop