Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists’ Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methods and Data Sources
3.1. Study Area Overview
3.2. Data Source and Processing
3.3. Research Methods
3.3.1. DeepSentiBank
3.3.2. Kernel Density Analysis
4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Photo Visual Semantic Word Frequency Statistics
4.2. Spatial Distribution of Photo Types
4.3. Tourists’ Photo Landscape Perception
4.3.1. Tourists’ Photo Landscape Perceptions at Different Time Scales
4.3.2. Tourist Photo Landscape Perceptions at Different Spatial Scales
4.4. Tourist Photo Emotional Preferences
4.4.1. Emotional Preferences of Tourists’ Photos at Different Time Scales
4.4.2. Emotional Preferences of Tourists’ Photos on Different Spatial Scales
5. Discussion
- (1)
- Through the visual semantic analysis of tourists’ photos in Huangshan Mountain, we were able to obtain nine types of themes, namely mountain rocks, road facilities, plants, architecture, natural scenery, people, meteorology, hydrology, and animals, in order according to the number of photos, accounting for 19.69%, 15.36%, 13.23%, 12.22%, 11.53%, 10.61%, 10.04%, 4.73%, and 2.59%, respectively. According to the emotional worth score, tourists’ photo emotions were classified into five ranges (0, 0.6), (0.6, 0.7), (0.7, 0.8), (0.8, 0.86), and (0.86, 0.98).
- (2)
- The spatial differentiation of tourists’ visual landscape perceptions: ① From an overall perspective, the perception of hydrology and animals landscape images generally has the spatial characteristics of “scattered distribution”, and plants, architecture, and meteorology landscape perception images in general present “significant nucleus” spatial characteristics. The perceived images of mountain rocks, road facilities, natural scenery, and people display spatial distribution characteristics of “concentrated into a belt”. ② From the perspective of scenic spots, Stone From Heaven, Brightness Apex, Celestial Capital Peak, etc., belong to the photographic theme of rock images; Cloud Valley Temple Station, South Gate, North Gate, etc., belong to the theme of road and facilities images; King Pine, Convincing Peak, Black Tiger Pine, etc., belong to the theme of plant images; Mercy Light Temple, Cloud Valley Temple, Sea Heart Pavilion, etc., belong to the theme of architectural images. ③ The emotional value of North Gate, South Gate, Pine Valley Station, West Gate, and Mountain Waist Temple is less than 0.65, while the emotional value of Celestial Capital Peak, Dragon Fish Peak, Convincing Peak, and Greeting Pine is higher, namely between 0.65 and 0.85. A characteristic analysis of cumulative emotional value was conducted for the representative attractions recommended by the Huangshan Tourism Marketing Organization, namely Stone From Heaven, Brightness Apex, Greeting Pine, and Hot Spring, and it was found that the cumulative emotional value of Hot Spring is much lower than the other three attractions, which is inconsistent with the recommended results of the Huangshan Tourism Marketing Organization. Hot Spring is the first stop when entering the scenic area from the gate of Huangshan Mountain, and few tourists soak in Hot Spring first before climbing the mountain. In addition, Hot Spring needs to pay higher fees, which may lead to a low emotional accumulation value for tourists. Therefore, it is necessary to add cultural design and implement landscape improvements to Huangshan Hot Spring, improve the marketing strategy and service measures of Hot Spring, and provide reasonable promotion and guidance to tourists so as to enhance the tourism quality of Hot Spring.
- (3)
- In terms of the temporal divergence of landscape types of concern in tourists’ photos: ① From the seasonal scale, mountain rocks are the landscape type of concern for tourists throughout all seasons. In addition, in summer, visitors also pay attention to plant landscape types, and in winter, they pay attention to meteorology, natural scenery, and roads and facilities. The change in tourists’ emotional value on the seasonal scale is a “slowly sloping straight line” type, and tourists’ emotional value is highest in winter and lowest in spring. ② On the monthly scale, throughout all months, tourists focus on the mountain rock landscape type; in December–February, they focus on the meteorology landscape type; and in May–July, they focus on the plant landscape type. The change in tourists’ emotional value on the monthly scale is in the shape of a “W”, with the highest emotional value in February and the lowest emotional value in March. ③ On the weekly scale, the mountain rock landscape is the type that attracts attention seven days a week. The change in the emotional value of tourists on the weekly scale is the “N” type. ④ On an hourly scale, the meteorology landscape is the type that tourists mainly pay attention to from 03:00 to 06:00. The change of tourists’ emotional value varies on the hourly scale in the shape of “M”, with the highest emotional value at 03:00 and the lowest at 00:00.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bhatia, A.; Roy, B.; Kumar, A. A review of tourism sustainability in the era of COVID-19. J. Stat. Manag. Syst. 2022, 25, 1871–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobhani, P.; Veisi, H.; Esmaeilzadeh, H.; Sadeghi, S.M.M.; Marcu, M.V.; Wolf, I.D. Tracing the Impact Pathways of COVID-19 on Tourism and Developing Strategies for Resilience and Adaptation in Iran. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Ji, X.; Li, Z. Spatial and temporal changes in European and American tourists’ emotional experiences at the Qin Shihuang Imperial Museum. Hum. Geogr. 2018, 33, 129–136. [Google Scholar]
- Chalfen, R.M. Photograph’s role in tourism: Some unexplored relationships. Ann. Tour. Res. 1979, 6, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adison, A.; Carolina, G.S.; Caroline, M.; Germán, C.; Alejandro, M.; Marco, P.; Laurent, T.; Lorena, V.; Paula, M. Landscape Disturbance Gradients: The Importance of the Type of Scene When Evaluating Landscape Preferences and Perceptions. Land 2020, 9, 306. [Google Scholar]
- Li, R.J.; Lu, Z.; Li, J.F. The calculation method of landscape perception sensitivity on sightseeing route in ecotourism destinations: A case study of Qixiagu Scenic Region in Wu’an National Geopark. J. Geogr. 2011, 66, 244–256. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, S.; Lee, J.; Tsai, H. Travel photos: Motivations, image dimensions, and affective qualities of places. Tour. Manag. 2014, 40, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepchenkova, S.; Zhan, F. Visual destination images of Peru: Comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yüksel, A.; Akgül, O. Postcards as affective image makers: An idle agent in destination marketing. Tour. Manag. 2006, 28, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, W.C. A typology of photographic representations for tourism: Depictions of groomed spaces. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, G.D.C.; Roig-Maimó, M.F.; Mascaró-Oliver, M.; Amengual-Alcover, E.; Mas-Sansó, R. Understanding How CNNs Recognize Facial Expressions: A Case Study with LIME and CEM. Sensors 2023, 23, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cherem, G.J.; Driver, B.L. Visitor Employed Photography: A Technique to Measure Common Perceptions of Natural Environments. J. Leis. Res. 1983, 15, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haywood, K.M. Visitor-Employed Photography: An Urban Visit Assessment. J. Travel Res. 1990, 29, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Wen, X.S. Dimensional analysis of local attachment elements of tourist places based on VEP method- Baiyun Mountain as an example. Hum. Geogr. 2012, 06, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
- Zong, Y.Y. Research on tourism imagery based on VEP content analysis: Fuzhou Baiyun Cave as an example. J. Jining Coll. 2013, 34, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
- Hunter, W.C. The social construction of tourism online destination image: A comparative semiotic analysis of the visual representation of Seoul. Tour. Manag. 2016, 54, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, P.; Pi, R.; Li, A.F. Binary construction and comparison of visual representation of tourism place image. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. Self Sci. Ed. 2018, 046, 94–101. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.Z.; Jiang, K.L.; Lu, L. Study on the spatial characteristics of tourists’ path trajectories in Nanjing:taking geotagged photos as an example. Econ. Geogr. 2014, 34, 181–187. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Yang, X.Z.; Sun, J.D. Spatial characteristics of tourist mobility in Nanjing based on new geographic information technology. Hum. Geogr. 2015, 2, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, R.R.; Yan, H.W.; Sun, Q.K. Research on tourist behavior of the upper Yellow River urban cluster with geographic photo metadata. Surv. Mapp. Sci. 2020, 45, 156–162. [Google Scholar]
- Kuo, C.L.; Chan, C.T.; Fan, I.C.; Zipf, A. Efficient Method for POI/ROI Discovery Using Flickr Geotagged Photos. Int. J. Geo Inf. 2018, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mou, N.; Yuan, R.; Yang, T.; Zhang, H.; Tang, J.; Makkonen, T. Exploring spatio-temporal changes of city inbound tourism flow: The case of Shanghai, China. Tour. Manag. 2019, 76, 103955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, N.; Zhong, L.N.; Li, H. Destination image perception based on UGC image metadata-Beijing as an example. J. Tour. 2018, 33, 53–62. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, Y.; Cho, N.; Yoon, J.; Park, S.; Kim, J. Transfer Learning of a Deep Learning Model for Exploring Tourists’ Urban Image Using Geotagged Photos. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 2021, 10, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Chen, Y.; Li, C. Discovering the tourists’ behaviors and perceptions in a tourism destination by analyzing photos’ visual content with a computer deep learning model: The case of Beijing. Tour. Manag. 2019, 75, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, N.; Liu, Y.F.; Niu, Y.; Ji, S.W. Different perceptions of Beijing’s destination images from tourists: An analysis of Flickr photos based on deep learning method. Resour. Sci. 2019, 41, 416–429. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Y.H.; Long, Y.; Yang, P.F. A study of urban imagery based on web photo data-an example of 24 major cities in China. Planner 2017, 2, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
- Bubalo, M.; Zanten, B.T.; Verburg, P.H. Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 184, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunkel, A. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 142, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueroa-Alfaro, R.W.; Tang, Z. Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2016, 60, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Zhao, Z.B. Research on the display of ancient village tourism landscape based on tourists’ experience: The case of Dangjia Village in Shaanxi. J. Beijing Second. Foreign Lang. Inst. 2009, 31, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, W.J. Research on cruise tourists’ expectations and perceptions of Li River landscape. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2013, 23, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
- Bigné, J.E.; Andreu, L.; Gnoth, J. The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehra, P. Unexpected surprise: Emotion analysis and aspect based sentiment analysis (ABSA) of user generated comments to study behavioral intentions of tourists. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 45, 101063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.P.; Jin, C. A review of research on emotions in tourism. Tour. Sci. 2015, 29, 74–85. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Y.J. A bipolar affective model of tourism experience:pleasure-pain. Res. Financ. Econ. 2006, 05, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Bao, J.G.; Zhu, Y.L. Exploration of emotional evaluation method of tourist destinations based on big data. Geogr. Res. 2017, 36, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, L. Study on the motivation behavior of tourists in mountain tourism places-an empirical analysis of tourists in Huangshan Mountain. Hum. Geogr. 1997, 12, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Yao, G. Study on image perception of Huangshan Mountain based on online reviews. World Reg. Stud. 2016, 25, 158–168. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.X.; Hao, S.M. Research on the evaluation of resources and sustainable development of Huangshan tourist scenic area. J. Chang. Inst. Technol. 2021, 34, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
- He, Z.; Deng, N.; Li, X.; Gu, H.M. How to “Read” a Destination from Images? Machine Learning and Network Methods for DMOs’ Image Projection and Photo Evaluation. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 597–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, N.; Liu, J. Where did you take those photos? Tourists’ preference clustering based on facial and background recognition. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 21, 100632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, X.; Zhong, Y.; Yang, L.; Wei, J.; Tang, X. Analysis of Forest Landscape Preferences and Emotional Features of Chinese Forest Recreationists Based on Deep Learning of Geotagged Photos. Forests 2022, 13, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Borth, D.; Darrell, T.; Chang, S.F. DeepSentiBank: Visual Sentiment Concept Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1410.8586. [Google Scholar]
- Lang, Y.H.; Li, R.J.; Fu, X.Q. Spatial pattern analysis of tourism behavior based on GPS track rasterization. J. Tour. 2019, 34, 48–57. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, N.; Li, X. Feeling a destination through the “right” photos: A machine learning model for DMOs’ photo selection. Tour. Manag. 2018, 65, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, F.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, C.; Qiu, M.; Yao, S. Xi’an tourism destination image analysis via deep learning. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2020, 13, 5093–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Fei, T.; Kwan, M.-P.; Kang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Bian, M. GIS-Based Emotional Computing: A Review of Quantitative Approaches to Measure the Emotion Layer of Human–Environment Relationships. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 2020, 9, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y. Spatiotemporal analysis of visual tourism images in Inner Mongolia from the perspective of tourists. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2020, 34, 194–200. [Google Scholar]
- Han, G.S.; Kim, S.; Ham, K.M. The Process and Method to Set a Mountainous Scenic Site’s Designated Area. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2020, 36, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, F.; Zhou, B.L.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Fung, H.H.; Lin, H.; Ratti, C. Measuring human perceptions of a large-scale urban region using machine learning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 180, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type | Noun |
---|---|
Mountain rocks | bridge, fence, garden, hill, hills, mountain, mountains, tower, valley |
Meteorology | sun, air, autumn, beach, clouds, darkness, dawn, fog, ice, island, mist, moon, morning, night, places, rain, rainbow, sea, sky, snow, spring, star, storm, summer, sunlight, sunrise, sunset, waves, winter |
Hydrology | spa, bay, creek, lake, pond, pool, river, water, waterfall, stream |
Plants | blossom, flora, flower, flowers, forest, grass, leaves, mushrooms, plant, rose, shadow, shadows, tree, trees, wood, woods |
Animals | animal, animals, bat, bats, bird, birds, bull, butterfly, cat, cats, chicken, cockroach, creatures, deer, dog, fish, fishing, hawk, horse, insect, kitty, monkey, pet, pets, pig, pony, puppy, rabbit, snake, spider, wings, wolf |
People | actor, adult, artist, baby, band, boy, chest, child, childhood, children, dad, driver, eyes, face, family, fan, friends, girls, glasses, guard, hands, hat, head, heart, kids, lady, legs, lips, men, mothers, mouth, parents, police, soldier, student, team, tears, teen, volunteers, worker |
Natural Scenery | earth, island, landscape, moon, nature, places, reserve, scene, scenery, sky, sunlight, view, views, wonder |
Road Facilities | road, street, streets, hospitals, hotel, bed, phone, piano, places, theatre, tour, toy, train, vacation, vehicle, wood |
Architecture | architecture, building, painting, paintings, statue, architecture, backyard, building, castle, chair, church, construction, design, farm, fence, fortress, hall, heritage, history, landmark, sign, space, toilet, tower, wall, window, sculpture, statue |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yan, J.; Yue, J.; Zhang, J.; Qin, P. Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists’ Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053843
Yan J, Yue J, Zhang J, Qin P. Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists’ Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(5):3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053843
Chicago/Turabian StyleYan, Junxia, Jiaheng Yue, Jianfeng Zhang, and Peng Qin. 2023. "Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists’ Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 5: 3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053843
APA StyleYan, J., Yue, J., Zhang, J., & Qin, P. (2023). Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists’ Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053843