Next Article in Journal
The Role of Functional Deficits, Depression, and Cognitive Symptoms in the Perceived Loneliness of Older Adults in Mexico City
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 4 Years after the COVID-19 Pandemic in Adolescents with Different Levels of Physical Activity Engagement: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 21
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph21080976
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temporal Trends in Air Pollution Exposure across Socioeconomic Groups in The Netherlands

by
Niklas Hlubek
1,*,
Yvonne Koop
1,
Alfred Wagtendonk
2 and
Ilonca Vaartjes
1
1
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Internal Mail No. Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(8), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080976
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 26 July 2024
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Air pollution exposure has been linked to detrimental health outcomes. While cross-sectional studies have demonstrated socioeconomic disparities in air pollution exposure, longitudinal evidence on these disparities remains limited. The current study investigates trends in residential air pollution exposure across socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Our dataset includes over 12.5 million individuals, aged 18 years and above, who resided in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019, using Statistics Netherlands data. The address-level air pollution concentrations were estimated by dispersion models of the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. We linked the exposure estimations of particulate matter < 10 or <2.5 μm (PM10, PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) to household-level socioeconomic data. In highly urbanized areas, individuals from both the lowest and highest socioeconomic groups were exposed to higher air pollution concentrations. Individuals from the lowest socioeconomic group were disproportionally located in highly urbanized and more polluted areas. The air pollution concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 decreased between 2014 and 2019 for all the socioeconomic groups. The decrease in the annual average air pollution concentrations was the strongest for the lowest socioeconomic group, although differences in exposure between the socioeconomic groups remain. Further research is needed to define the health and equity implications.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is a major health challenge worldwide and is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the largest environmental health risk in Europe [1,2]. Long-term exposure to air pollution such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and nitrogen oxide (NO2) has consistently been associated with adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease outcomes [3] and mortality [4,5].
Over the last few decades, the majority of the environmental inequality literature from North America, New Zealand, Asia, and Africa has shown that exposure to poor air quality is linked to a lower socioeconomic position (SEP) [6]. Evidence from the European region is rather mixed and the SEP gradient in terms of air pollution exposure is often described as U-shaped, where the lowest SEP group shows the highest levels of exposure, yet also the highest SEP group experiences higher levels of exposure than other groups [7,8,9]. This pattern is likely linked to the spatial distribution of densely populated and highly polluted urban areas, where individuals from the lowest SEP group often reside near pollution sources such as highways or factories, while high SEP individuals often reside in more expensive and polluted city centers [10,11,12].
To protect individuals from air pollution exposure, many initiatives to improve air quality in cities have been set up in the last 30 years. For example, the WHO’s Healthy City Network aims to put health high on the political and social agenda of cities and to build a strong movement for public health at the local level [13]. Furthermore, the adoption and implementation of policy interventions have proved to be effective in improving air quality in North America and Europe by reducing the average population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations between 2010 and 2016 in those regions [14,15,16].
Despite the overall improvements in air pollution exposure, SEP-related exposure inequalities in the European region have remained [17,18] or even increased over time in some countries [19,20]. Current evidence on changes in SEP inequalities in air pollution exposure is based on area-level comparisons, missing finer-scale exposure contrasts (e.g., living near a major road). There is a need for longitudinal studies that are carried out at the national level using individual-level data to investigate patterns in the exposure distribution across socioeconomic groups [10,18,21].
To the best of our knowledge, there is no longitudinal study using individual-level data to investigate temporal changes in air pollution exposure across SEP groups on a national level in the European region. The current study aims to fill this gap by investigating nationwide temporal trends in air pollution exposure between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands, examining the average annual concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 across SEP groups.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population and Data Linkage

For this longitudinal study, data on the annual average air pollution concentrations for every year between 2014 and 2019 were linked to sociodemographic data on all the registered residents in the Netherlands. Sociodemographic information was centralized by Statistics Netherlands and originated from the National Population Register, the tax register, and education registers. A detailed description of the sources and generation of the datasets from these registers can be found at www.cbs.nl/microdata (accessed on 23 July 2024).
For every year between 2014 and 2019, we created separate cohorts of all the residents who were registered in the National Population Register in each given year. The average annual air pollution concentrations were then linked to individuals in each cohort based on their residential address data.
We only included individuals who were 18 years or older on 1 January 2014, and did not decease before 31 December 2019. Individuals with missing or incomplete data on air pollution, SEP, or urbanicity in any year were excluded (n = 27,911), resulting in a total sample of 12,520,681 individuals who were registered at an address between 2014 and 2019.

2.2. Air Pollution Data for the Netherlands, 2014–2019

The average concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 for 2014 to 2019 were modeled and mapped on a grid with a resolution of 25 m by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and provided by the Geoscience and health Cohort Consortium (GECCO) [22]. The maps were constructed from 1 km resolution nationwide background concentration maps combined with local traffic information. In short, the nationwide background concentration maps were based on dispersion models, including information on industrial, vehicular, and household emissions in the Netherlands and abroad, meteorological data, and chemical information [23]. Two models (one for roads within cities and one for highways in more open terrain) based on local vehicular traffic data, originating from the Dutch National Air Quality Cooperation Program [in Dutch: ‘Nationaal Samenwerkingsprogramma Luchtkwaliteit’] [24,25] were combined with the national background maps [23,25]. The model prediction patterns and absolute concentrations generally agreed well with the measurements for NO2 and PM2.5 [23,25]; however, quality quantification is hard to interpret as measurements have been used in calibrating the models. Next, the air pollution concentrations were calculated at 9 million datapoints in the Netherlands, which were then interpolated to a raster map with a 25 m resolution using ordinary Kriging. The air pollution concentrations were linked to address locations and exported to a tabular format [22].

2.3. Socioeconomic Position

The household-level SEP data were obtained from Statistics Netherlands and hold information on the financial welfare (income and wealth of household), educational level (maximum of main breadwinner and partner), and recent employment history (maximum of main breadwinner and partner) for all the private households in the Netherlands (SES-WOA) [26]. Data were available for all the years from 2014 to 2019. The overall SES-WOA score is a composite of the sub-scores of financial welfare, educational level, and employment history and is calculated by Statistics Netherlands with the use of multiple correspondence analysis [26]. The SEP quintile scores were constructed with the bottom quintile consisting of the lowest SEP (1) and the top quintile representing the highest SEP (5).

2.4. Ethnicity

We differentiated between ethnic groups according to Statistics Netherlands’ definition of migration background, which is based on the country of birth of the person and their parents [26]. If the person and both parents were born in the Netherlands, the person’s ethnicity was classified as Dutch. If the person and one or both parents were born abroad (i.e., first-generation migrant), their ethnicity was based on the person’s country of birth. If the person was born in the Netherlands and one of the parents was born abroad (i.e., second-generation migrant), ethnicity was based on the country of birth of the parent born abroad. If the person was born in the Netherlands and both parents were born abroad (i.e., second-generation migrant), ethnicity was based on the mother’s country of birth.

2.5. Covariates

Data on age (in years), sex (biological sex as registered at birth), and marital status (married, unmarried and other) were obtained from the Population Register for the years 2014 and 2019 [26]. Neighborhoods in the Netherlands are defined as homogeneously bounded parts of a municipality from a building or socioeconomic perspective [26]. Urbanicity was defined by the neighborhoods’ address density. The neighborhood address density was the average address density per residential address in the neighborhood. The address density per residential address was calculated as the number of addresses in a 1 km2 circular buffer around the residential address. We divided urbanicity into two categories, indicating that the residential address was situated in a rural to moderately urbanized neighborhood (<2000 addresses/km2) or a highly urbanized neighborhood (>2000 addresses/km2).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

2.6.1. Summary Statistics

Demographic characteristics were described as the number and percentage of ethnicity (ethnic Dutch, European excluding ethnic Dutch, Indonesian, Turkish. Moroccan and other), marital status (married/unmarried/other), age categories (18–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70, 71–80, 81+), and SEP group (quintiles) in 2014 and 2019 for the total cohort and stratified by the level of urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized, highly urbanized). Summary statistics (mean, standard deviation, maximum) were computed for all the air pollutants for all the years from 2014 to 2019 to characterize the annual air pollution concentrations. The annual average air pollution concentrations between 2014 and 2019 were visualized nationwide and stratified by urbanicity.

2.6.2. Average Concentrations across Socioeconomic Position Groups

To examine and visualize the trends in the distribution of air pollution among different SEP groups, we calculated the average annual concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 for all the years from 2014 to 2019 per SEP quintiles, stratified by the level of urbanicity. We quantified the absolute changes in the air pollution concentrations between 2014 and 2019 across the SEP quintiles and computed the relative differences to express the changes as a percentage of the concentration in 2014. For a sensitivity analysis, we computed a similar analysis using the SEP deciles (Table S1a–c).
All the analyses were performed in the secured environment of Statistics Netherlands and performed in R version 4.2.3 (15 March 2023) [27].

3. Results

3.1. Population Characteristics

Between 2014 and 2019, we identified 12,520,681 individuals aged 18 years or above with registered addresses in the Netherlands. In 2014, we identified 12,000,901 individuals, with 8,371,072 (69.7%) individuals living in rural to moderately urbanized areas and 3,629,829 (30.3%) in highly urbanized areas. In 2019, we identified 11,721,518 individuals, with 7,493,373 (63.9%) living in rural to moderately urbanized areas and 4,228,145 (36.1%) in highly urbanized areas. More individuals with a non-Dutch ethnic background lived in highly urbanized areas (32.2% in 2014; 35.4% in 2019) compared to rural to moderately urbanized areas (14.3% in 2014; 15.7% in 2019). In highly urbanized areas, more unmarried individuals were registered (60.9% in 2014; 60.1% in 2019) compared to rural to moderately urbanized areas, where more married individuals were registered (43.8% in 2014; 43.6% in 2019). Individuals from lower age groups (18–30 and 31–49 years of age) were more often registered in highly urbanized areas. In highly urbanized areas, more than one-quarter of registered individuals were from the lowest SEP group (26.5% in 2014; 26.0% in 2019) compared to 12.0% in 2014 and 14.3% in 2019 in rural to moderately urbanized areas (Table 1).

3.2. Annual Average Pollutant Concentrations

Nationally, all the air pollution concentrations decreased between 2014 and 2019. PM2.5 showed the largest average concentration decrease (24.2%), followed by PM10 (14.6%) and NO2 (12.2%). The concentrations of all the air pollutants were consistently lower for individuals living in rural to moderately urbanized areas than in highly urbanized areas. The pattern of change was similar between the categories of urbanicity (Figure 1a–c). Table 2 summarizes the PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 concentrations across all the exposure years.

3.3. Differences in Average Air Pollutant Concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by Socioeconomic Position Group

3.3.1. PM2.5

Nationwide, the average PM2.5 concentrations were higher for the lowest and highest SEP groups compared with the other SEP groups, although the lowest SEP group showed the highest average PM2.5 concentrations in 2014 (13.54 µg/m3) while the average PM2.5 concentrations were similar for both the lowest and the highest SEP group in 2019 (10.23 µg/m3; 10.22 µg/m3). When stratified for urbanicity, the average PM2.5 concentrations in rural to moderately urbanized areas were consistently the highest for the highest SEP group. In highly urbanized areas, the average PM2.5 concentrations were higher for the lowest and the highest SEP group, with the highest average concentrations observed in the highest SEP group (Figure 2a).
The relative differences in the average PM2.5 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 were higher in highly urbanized areas compared with rural to moderately urbanized areas across the SEP groups. The lower SEP groups showed larger relative differences in the average PM2.5 concentrations in highly urbanized areas compared to the other SEP groups. We observed the highest relative difference in the average PM2.5 concentrations for the lowest SEP group, both nationwide and in highly urbanized areas. The relative differences in the average PM2.5 concentrations across the SEP groups were homogenous in rural to moderately urbanized areas (Table 3).

3.3.2. PM10

Nationwide, the average PM10 concentrations were higher for the lowest and highest SEP groups compared with the other groups, although the lowest SEP group showed the highest PM10 concentrations in 2014 (20.89 µg/m3) while the average PM10 concentrations were similar for both the lowest and the highest SEP group in 2019 (17.80 µg/m3; 17.78 µg/m3). When stratified for urbanicity, the average PM10 concentrations in rural to moderately urbanized areas were consistently the highest for the highest SEP group. In highly urbanized areas, the average PM10 concentrations were consistently higher for the lowest and the highest SEP groups compared with the other groups, with the highest average concentrations in the highest SEP group (Figure 2b).
The relative differences in the average PM10 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 were higher in rural to moderately urbanized areas compared with highly urbanized areas across the SEP groups. The lower SEP groups showed larger relative differences in the average PM10 concentrations in highly urbanized areas compared to the other groups. We observed the highest relative difference in the average PM10 concentrations for the lowest SEP group, both nationwide and across levels of urbanicity (Table 4 and Figure 2b).

3.3.3. NO2

Nationwide, the average NO2 concentrations were consistently higher for the lowest and highest SEP groups compared with the other groups. Specifically, the lowest SEP group showed the highest NO2 concentrations in 2014 (21.53 µg/m3) and in 2019 (18.62 µg/m3). When stratified for urbanicity, the average NO2 concentrations in rural to moderately urbanized areas were consistently the highest for the highest SEP group. In highly urbanized areas, the average NO2 concentrations were higher for the lowest and the highest SEP groups compared with the other groups, with the highest average concentrations for the lowest SEP group in 2014 and the highest average concentrations for the highest SEP group in 2019 (Figure 2c).
The relative differences in the average NO2 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 were higher in highly urbanized areas compared with rural to moderately urbanized areas across the SEP groups. The lower SEP groups showed larger relative differences in the average NO2 concentrations in highly urbanized areas compared to the other groups. We observed the highest relative difference in the average NO2 concentrations for the lowest SEP group, both nationwide and across levels of urbanicity (Table 5).

3.4. Sensitivity Analysis

We conducted a sensitivity analysis to investigate the potential variations of the differences in the average annual air pollutant concentrations when using the SEP group deciles instead of quintiles. The results of the sensitivity analysis were in line with our initial findings and can be found in Supplementary Materials (Table S1a–c).

4. Discussion

Our study utilizes a comprehensive longitudinal dataset, encompassing over 12.5 million registered individuals in the Netherlands, with detailed demographic and individual-level air pollution data from 2014 to 2019. We present an overview of the temporal changes in exposure to PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 concentrations from 2014 to 2019 across SEP groups.
Between 2014 and 2019, the average air pollution concentrations consistently decreased in the Netherlands. The observed decreases originate from reductions in emissions in various sectors and are driven by autonomous technological development and policy measures. National emission reductions in the Netherlands are required under the Gothenburg Protocol [28] and EU National Emission Ceilings Directive [29]. The largest contributing sector to reductions in emissions contributing to air quality is industry (including electricity productions and refineries), followed by agriculture and transport [30]. The average PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations showed a stronger decrease in highly urbanized areas, while the average PM10 concentrations showed a stronger decrease in rural to moderately urbanized areas. The average PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations showed a temporal increase from 2017 to 2018. This increase is likely due to changes in the measurement, as municipalities submitted more livestock farms for inclusion in the calculations for 2018 and there were unusual weather conditions in those years, such as a general lack of rain [31].
While the average PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 concentrations in the Netherlands decreased for all the SEP groups between 2014 and 2019, the decrease was generally stronger for the lowest SEP groups. This pattern was more pronounced in highly urbanized areas, whereas in rural to moderately urbanized areas the concentration decreases were more homogenous across the SEP groups. Comparable evidence on the temporal changes in air pollution exposure across SEP groups in the European region is scarce, as most studies are cross-sectional and rely on area-level data. An EU report on air pollution and deprivation from 2007 to 2013/14 indicated that low SEP groups generally benefitted from reductions in air pollution levels at least as much as those in higher SEP groups [18]. Evidence on the national level showed that in Great Britain, the annual average NO2 concentrations decreased at lower rates in the most deprived areas between 2001 and 2011 and the annual average PM10 concentrations even increased in low SEP areas [20]. Building upon these findings, our study provides more recent evidence, demonstrating a strong decrease in air pollution exposure for individuals in the lowest SEP group between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands. This decrease was particularly pronounced in highly urbanized areas, where the main sources of air pollution, such as traffic emissions, are more concentrated. The implementation of environmental and traffic measures, including the banning of older, higher-emission vehicles from densely populated areas and city centers, and the enforcement of speed limits, may have had a significant impact in these areas. This highlights the potential benefits of air pollution reduction strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Future research should prioritize the use of individual-level data on a national scale to monitor socioeconomic differences in air pollution changes over time.
Despite the general decrease in the air pollution concentrations between 2014 and 2019 for all the SEP groups, we observed consistent disparities in exposure between the groups, dependent on urbanicity and the type of pollutant. In highly urbanized areas, individuals from both the lowest and highest SEP groups were consistently exposed to higher annual average NO2 concentrations compared to the other groups. This U-shaped pattern was similar yet less strong for the annual average PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. In rural to moderately urbanized areas, we consistently observed higher annual average air pollution concentrations for the highest SEP group compared to the other SEP groups. Our findings are comparable with a recent Danish study that also used nationwide individual-level data to assess air pollution exposure at the residence [32]. In 2017, Danish individuals from the highest SEP were on average exposed to higher PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations, whereas in highly urbanized areas, individuals from the lowest SEP group were also exposed the higher average NO2 concentrations compared to the other SEP groups. In both the Netherlands and Denmark, individuals from lower SEP groups might relocate to urban areas with higher pollution levels but typically do not reside in the densely trafficked central parts of cities, which are often attractive yet expensive and predominantly inhabited by those from a higher SEP. The housing market conditions in highly urbanized areas may pressure individuals from the lowest SEP group to disproportionately reside near main roads, leading to higher exposure to road transport-related air pollutants such as NO2 and PM2.5 [33,34]. This could be an explanation for our finding of a U-shaped SEP gradient in highly urbanized areas in the Netherlands, where both the lowest and highest SEP groups are exposed to higher NO2 concentrations than other groups.
Although unhealthy levels of air pollution pose a risk to all individuals, those from lower SEP groups may exhibit increased susceptibility to the associated health risks [35]. This heightened vulnerability could stem from pre-existing health conditions or other harmful exposures associated with a lower social position, such as occupational hazards, which could further impair their health status [10]. Our study demonstrates that individuals from the lowest SEP group were disproportionately located in highly urbanized and heavily polluted areas in the Netherlands, representing the largest group in these areas compared to any other SEP group. The health risks associated with air pollution may be particularly relevant for this more exposed and vulnerable population group.
Among the strengths of the current study are that it benefitted from data on the entire population of the Netherlands aged 18 and above between 2014 and 2019, with the usage of nationwide socioeconomic data on the household level and the modeling of the air pollution concentration at the residential address-level. While the majority of studies on environmental inequality are carried out cross-sectionally, the current study contributes to the understanding of temporal changes in air pollution exposure across SEP groups. We were able to compute the results on a population-wide dataset providing a comprehensive portrayal of the changing social distribution of air pollution exposure between 2014 and 2019.
The limitations include the fact that the current study only focused on exposure to PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 concentrations and the associations might differ for other air pollutants, such as ultrafine particles and black carbon. Furthermore, the modeled air pollution concentrations at the household level can only be seen as a proxy for personal exposure. Although the air pollution concentrations from the prediction models showed good agreement [23,25], we acknowledge some remaining uncertainty; however, by averaging over large-scale population groups, over- or underestimations are minimized, ensuring the robustness of our results. Actual exposure is also influenced by indoor air pollution, exposure during occupation, and mobility patterns. Additionally, exposure variations exist at the street-level scale, influenced by factors such as the altitude of the living floor and the distance from the façade to the street center [36]. The associations between the sociodemographic characteristics of the population and the residential air pollution concentrations are likely location-specific and generalization to other countries should be performed with caution.

5. Conclusions

The air pollution concentrations (PM2.5, PM10, and NO2) have decreased for all the SEP groups in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019, with the strongest decrease for the lowest SEP group. The average PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations showed a stronger decrease in highly urbanized areas, while the average PM10 concentrations showed a stronger decrease in rural to moderately urbanized areas. Within rural to moderate urbanized areas, individuals in the highest SEP group were consistently exposed to the highest air pollution concentrations. In highly urbanized areas, individuals from the highest and lowest SEP group were exposed to higher air pollution concentrations compared to the other SEP groups. Individuals from the lowest SEP group were disproportionately located in highly urbanized and polluted areas compared to any other SEP group. Our findings highlight that while exposure to air pollution decreased more in favor of the lowest SEP group in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019, the average exposure differences between socioeconomic groups persist and vary depending on the specific pollutant and urbanization level.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph21080976/s1.

Author Contributions

N.H., Y.K. and I.V. conceptualized and designed the study. N.H. performed the formal analysis and drafted the first version of the manuscript. N.H. accessed and verified the underlying data. N.H., Y.K. and I.V. interpreted the results. A.W. extracted and curated the air pollution data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by SURREAL-ITN (https://surreal-itn.eu/, accessed on 23 July 2024) and the University Medical Center Utrecht. SURREAL-ITN is funded through the European Union’s H2020 under grant agreement No. 956780. The geodata were obtained via the Geoscience and Health Cohort Consortium, which was financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, and Amsterdam University Medical Center.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was performed according to the guidelines of the local research ethics committees.

Informed Consent Statement

In compliance to research regulations concerning the Dutch law on Medical Research in Humans, approval by an ethics committee was not required for the present study.

Data Availability Statement

The results are based on calculations using geodata and non-public microdata from Statistics Netherlands; the full datasets are not available due to privacy regulations. Under certain conditions, the underlying encrypted microdata are accessible for statistical and scientific research. For further information, contact [email protected]. If verification of the analyses is desired and Statistics Netherlands provides access to the microdata, we will provide the R-scripts for the cohort-building and analyses upon request to the corresponding author. The geodata can be downloaded from www.atlasleefomgeving.nl or requested from the Geoscience and Health Cohort Consortium (www.gecco.nl).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Environmental Health Inequalities in Europe: Second Assessment Report; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289054157 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  2. European Environment Agency (EEA). Air Quality in Europe 2022. 2022. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2022 (accessed on 8 September 2023).
  3. Liu, M.; Meijer, P.; Lam, T.M.; Timmermans, E.J.; Grobbee, D.E.; Beulens, J.W.J.; Vaartjes, I.; Lakerveld, J. The built environment and cardiovascular disease: An umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023, 30, 1801–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Atkinson, R.W.; Butland, B.K.; Anderson, H.R.; Maynard, R.L. Long-term Concentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide and Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. Epidemiology 2018, 29, 460–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, J.; Hoek, G. Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hajat, A.; Hsia, C.; O‘Neill, M.S. Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: A Global Review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015, 2, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brunt, H.; Barnes, J.; Jones, S.J.; Longhurst, J.W.S.; Scally, G.; Hayes, E. Air pollution, deprivation and health: Understanding relationships to add value to local air quality management policy and practice in Wales, UK. J. Public Health 2017, 39, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Walker, G.; Mitchell, G.; Fairburn, J.; Smith, G. Environmental Quality and Social Deprivation Phase II: National Analysis of Flood Hazard, IPC Industries and Air Quality; Report No. E2-067/1; Environment Agency: Bristol, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairburn, J.; Walker, G.; Smith, G. Investigating Environmental Justice in Scotland: Links between Measures of Environmental Quality and Social Deprivation; Sniffer: Balen, Belgium, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairburn, J.; Schule, S.A.; Dreger, S.; Karla Hilz, L.; Bolte, G. Social Inequalities in Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution: A Systematic Review in the WHO European Region. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Samoli, E.; Stergiopoulou, A.; Santana, P.; Rodopoulou, S.; Mitsakou, C.; Dimitroulopoulou, C.; Bauwelinck, M.; de Hoogh, K.; Costa, C.; Mari-Dell’Olmo, M.; et al. Spatial variability in air pollution exposure in relation to socioeconomic indicators in nine European metropolitan areas: A study on environmental inequality. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fecht, D.; Fischer, P.; Fortunato, L.; Hoek, G.; de Hoogh, K.; Marra, M.; Kruize, H.; Vienneau, D.; Beelen, R.; Hansell, A. Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 198, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. World Health Organization. National Healthy Cities Networks in the WHO European Region: Promoting Health and Well-Being throughout Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2015. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289051026 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  14. Shaddick, G.; Thomas, M.L.; Mudu, P.; Ruggeri, G.; Gumy, S. Half the world’s population are exposed to increasing air pollution. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2020, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crippa, M.; Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Dentener, F.; Guizzardi, D.; Sindelarova, K.; Muntean, M.; Van Dingenen, R.; Granier, C. Forty years of improvements in European air quality: Regional policy-industry interactions with global impacts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 3825–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuklinska, K.; Wolska, L.; Namiesnik, J. Air quality policy in the U.S. and the EU—A review. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2015, 6, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. European Environment Agency (EEA). Income-Related Environmental Inequalities Associated with Air Pollution in Europe. 2023. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/income-related-environmental-inequalities-associated (accessed on 8 September 2023).
  18. European Environment Agency (EEA). Analysis of Air Pollution and Noise and Social Deprivation. 2018. Available online: https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-atni/products/etc-atni-reports/eionet_rep_etcacm_2018_7_deprivation_aq_noise (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  19. Pisoni, E.; Dominguez-Torreiro, M.; Thunis, P. Inequality in exposure to air pollutants: A new perspective. Environ. Res. 2022, 212 Pt B, 113358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitchell, G.; Norman, P.; Mullin, K. Who benefits from environmental policy? An environmental justice analysis of air quality change in Britain, 2001–2011. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 105009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fairburn, J.; Maier, W.; Braubach, M. Incorporating Environmental Justice into Second Generation Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Lessons from the UK and Progress Internationally. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lakerveld, J.; Wagtendonk, A.; Vaartjes, I.; Karssenberg, D.; Consortium, G. Deep phenotyping meets big data: The Geoscience and hEalth Cohort COnsortium (GECCO) data to enable exposome studies in The Netherlands. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2020, 19, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Velders, G.J.M.; Aben, J.M.M.; Jimmink, B.A.; van der Swaluw, E.; de Vries, W.J.; Geilenkirchen, G.P.; Matthijsen, J. Large-scale Air Quality Concentration and Deposition Maps in the Netherlands—Report 2011. RIVM Rep. 2011, 680362001. [Google Scholar]
  24. de Smet, P.A.M.; Visser, S.; Valster, N.L.; Schuch, W.J.L.; Geijer, M.N.; Wesseling, J.P.; van den Beld, W.A.; Drukker, D.; Groot Wassink, H.; Sanders, A. Monitoringsrapportage NSL 2020: Stand van Zaken Nationaal Samenwerkingsprogramma Luchtkwaliteit; Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM): Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wesseling, J.; Nguyen, L.; Hoogerbrugge, R. Gemeten en Berekende Concentraties Stikstof(di)oxiden en Fijnstof in de Periode 2010 t/m 2015 (Update): Een Test Van de Standaardrekenmethoden 1 en 2; Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek Microdata Services. Documentatie Socialeconomische Statusscore van Particuliere Huishoudens of 1 Januari (SESWOA); CBS: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2024. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  28. UNECE. Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-Level Ozone; UN/ECE Document EB/AIR/1999/1; United Nations Economic and Social Council: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  29. EU. Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the Emissions Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Velders, G.J.M.; Maas, R.J.M.; Geilenkirchen, G.P.; de Leeuw, F.A.A.M.; Ligterink, N.E.; Ruyssenaars, P.; de Vries, W.J.; Wesseling, J. Effects of European emission reductions on air quality in the Netherlands and the associated health effects. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 221, 117109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. de Smet, P.; Visser, S.; Valster, N.; Schuch, W.; Wesseling, J.; van Hooydonk, P.; van den Beld, W.; Drukker, D.; Groot Wassink, H.; Sanders, A. Monitoringsrapportage NSL 2019: Stand van zaken Nationaal Samenwerkingsprogramma Luchtkwaliteit. In NSL 2019 Monitoring Report; Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu: De Bilt, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Taj, T.; Poulsen, A.H.; Hvidtfeldt, U.A.; Ketzel, M.; Christensen, J.H.; Brandt, J.; Frohn, L.M.; Geels, C.; Valencia, V.H.; et al. Air pollution at the residence of Danish adults, by socio-demographic characteristics, morbidity, and address level characteristics. Environ. Res. 2022, 208, 112714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mielck, A.; Heinrich, J. Social inequalities and distribution of the environmental burden among the population (environmental justice). Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverb. Der Arzte Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes) 2002, 64, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. European Environment Agency (EEA). Air Quality in Europe: 2019 Report; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019; ISBN 978-92-9480-088-6. [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Neill, M.S.; Jerrett, M.; Kawachi, I.; Levy, J.I.; Cohen, A.J.; Gouveia, N.; Wilkinson, P.; Fletcher, T.; Cifuentes, L.; Schwartz, J. Health, wealth, and air pollution: Advancing theory and methods. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Luchtkwaliteit in de Grote Stad. TVVL Magazine. 2013. Available online: http://bronconsult.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Luchtkwaliteit-in-de-grote-stad.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2024).
Ijerph 21 00976 g001
Figure 1. (a) Annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) (b) Annual average PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average PM10 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas). (c) Annual average NO2 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average NO2 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas).
Figure 1. (a) Annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) (b) Annual average PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average PM10 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas). (c) Annual average NO2 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity. Annual average NO2 concentrations (µg/m3); nationwide and by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas).
Ijerph 21 00976 g001
Ijerph 21 00976 g002
Figure 2. (a) Annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest). (b) Annual average PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average PM10 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest). (c) Annual average NO2 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average NO2 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest).
Figure 2. (a) Annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest). (b) Annual average PM10 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average PM10 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest). (c) Annual average NO2 concentrations in the Netherlands for the period 2014–2019 by urbanicity and SEP group. Annual average NO2 concentrations (µg/m3) by urbanicity (rural to moderately urbanized and highly urbanized areas) and socioeconomic position (SEP) group (1—lowest to 5—highest).
Ijerph 21 00976 g002
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of registered individuals in the Netherlands for 2014 and 2019.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of registered individuals in the Netherlands for 2014 and 2019.
NationwideRural to Moderately Urbanized Areas 1Highly Urbanized Areas 2
201420192014201920142019
N (%)12,000,901 (100)11,721,518 (100)8,371,072 (69.7)7,493,373 (63.9)3,629,829 (30.3)4,228,145 (36.1)
Female—N (%)6,123,174 (51.0)5,971,023 (50.9)4,247,354 (50.7)3,805,917 (50.8)1,875,820 (51.7)2,165,106 (51.2)
Ethnicity—N (%)
Ethnic Dutch9,592,811 (79.9)9,036,258 (77.1)7,170,794 (85.7)6,305,021 (84.1)2,422,017 (66.7)2,731,237 (64.6)
European excl. Dutch755,728 (6.3)888,467 (7.6)464,734 (5.6)474,209 (6.3)290,994 (8.0)414,258 (9.8)
Indonesian318,185 (2.7)310,942 (2.7)195,601 (2.3)175,277 (2.3)122,584 (3.4)135,665 (3.2)
Turkish263,169 (2.2)267,702 (2.3)102,451 (1.2)90,932 (1.2)160,718 (4.4)176,770 (4.2)
Surinamese252,579 (2.1)252,185 (2.2)89,988 (1.1)84,651 (1.1)162,591 (4.5)167,534 (4.0)
Moroccan228,745 (1.9)232,732 (2.0)78,287 (0.9)70,253 (0.9)150,458 (4.1)162,479 (3.8)
Other589,683 (4.9)733,131 (6.4)269,216 (3.2)293,029 (3.9)320,467 (8.8)440,202 (10.4)
Marital status—N (%)
Married6,122,843 (51.0)5,910,200 (50.4)4,705,716 (56.2)4,223,459 (56.4)1,417,127 (39.0)1,686,741 (39.9)
Unmarried4,029,771 (33.6)3,522,039 (30.0)2,415,847 (28.9)1,822,170 (24.3)1,613,924 (44.5)1,699,869 (40.2)
Other1,848,287 (15.4)2,289,279 (19.5)1,249,509 (14.9)1,447,744 (19.3)598,778 (16.4)841,535 (19.9)
Age in years—N (%)
18–302,286,146 (19.4)1,598,208 (13.6)1,386,812 (16.8)811,930 (10.8)899,334 (25.1)786,278 (18.6)
31–401,908,844 (16.2)1,944,693 (16.6)1,236,182 (15.0)1,139,251 (15.2)672,662 (18.8)805,442 (19.0)
41–502,423,299 (20.5)2,103,797 (17.9)1,768,591 (21.5)1,388,762 (18.5)654,708 (18.3)715,035 (16.9)
51–602,225,377 (18.8)2,291,276 (19.5)1,642,871 (20.0)1,572,887 (21.0)582,506 (16.3)718,389 (17.0)
61–701,811,973 (15.3)1,886,903 (16.1)1,349,278 (16.4)1,295,481 (17.3)462,695 (12.9)591,422 (14.0)
71–80910,492 (7.7)1,322,422 (11.3)673,761 (8.2)908,605 (12.1)236,731 (6.6)413,817 (9.8)
81+247,790 (2.1)574,219 (4.9)173,734 (2.1)376,457 (5.0)74,056 (2.1)197,762 (4.7)
SEP Quintiles—N (%)
1—lowest2,040,311 (17.0)2,171,763 (18.5)1,078,572 (12.9)1,071,003 (14.3)961,739 (26.5)1,100,760 (26.0)
22,503,730 (20.9)2,456,233 (21.0)1,741,261 (20.8)1,573,113 (21.0)762,469 (21.0)883,120 (20.9)
32,539,294 (21.2)2,413,635 (20.6)1,910,958 (22.8)1,669,345 (22.3)628,336 (17.3)744,290 (17.6)
42,476,620 (20.6)2,372,348 (20.2)1,896,889 (22.7)1,679,045 (22.4)579,731 (16.0)693,303 (16.4)
5—highest2,440,946 (20.3)2,307,539 (19.7)1,743,392 (20.8)1,500,867 (20.0)697,554 (19.2)806,672 (19.1)
1 Rural to moderately urbanized areas (<2000 addresses/km2). 2 Highly urbanized areas (>2000 addresses/km2).
Table 2. Annual air pollution concentration for PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 in the Netherlands for the period 2014 and 2019, nationwide and by urbanicity.
Table 2. Annual air pollution concentration for PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 in the Netherlands for the period 2014 and 2019, nationwide and by urbanicity.
YearUrbanicity 1PM2.5 (µg/m3)—Mean (SD)PM2.5 (µg/m3)—MaxPM10 (µg/m3)—Mean (SD)PM10 (µg/m3)—MaxNO2 (µg/m3)—Mean (SD)NO2 (µg/m3)—Max
2014Nationwide13.35 (1.42)19.5320.65 (1.70)40.6620.22 (5.17)51.20
Highly urbanized14.11 (1.11)17.7021.59 (1.41)27.4224.64 (4.44)51.20
Rural to moderately urbanized13.00 (1.31)19.5320.22 (1.78)40.6618.22 (4.12)45.89
2015Nationwide11.00 (1.37)26.9118.44 (1.73)36.8519.44 (5.15)49.55
Highly urbanized11.68 (1.11)26.9119.30 (1.38)35.1623.48 (4.39)47.89
Rural to moderately urbanized10.65 (1.36)26.5018.01 (1.72)36.8517.37 (4.19)49.55
2016Nationwide 10.90 (1.48)17.5118.12 (1.82)35.5020.07 (5.07)60.13
Highly urbanized11.71 (1.17)16.9419.35 (1.48)25.8024.16 (4.31)60.13
Rural to moderately urbanized10.48 (1.46)17.5117.47 (1.64)35.5017.94 (4.03)45.97
2017Nationwide10.75 (1.38)16.6217.96 (1.76)30.3419.75 (5.21)45.35
Highly urbanized11.50 (1.07)16.3219.06 (1.40)25.6523.77 (4.43)45.35
Rural to moderately urbanized10.35 (1.37)16.6217.38 (1.65)30.3417.60 (4.24)42.04
2018Nationwide11.64 (1.29)17.2919.05 (1.65)31.0318.89 (4.71)43.83
Highly urbanized12.41 (1.04)17.0520.17 (1.36)26.7022.57 (4.12)43.33
Rural to moderately urbanized11.21 (1.21)17.2918.44 (1.46)31.0316.88 (3.68)43.83
2019Nationwide10.12 (1.08)15.6317.63 (1.43)29.1317.76 (4.26)42.43
Highly urbanized10.61 (0.91)13.3918.44 (1.19)23.5220.97 (3.74)40.88
Rural to moderately urbanized9.85 (1.08)15.6317.14 (1.32)29.1315.92 (3.34)42.43
1 Urbanicity: rural to moderately urbanized areas (<2000 addresses/km2); highly urbanized areas (>2000 addresses/km2).
Table 3. Differences in the average PM2.5 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Table 3. Differences in the average PM2.5 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Urbanicity 1SEP Group 2PM2.5 (µg/m3)—Mean 2014PM2.5 (µg/m3)—Mean 2019Absolute DifferenceRelative Difference (%)
Nationwide113.5410.23−3.3−24.5
213.2710.07−3.2−24.1
313.2210.04−3.2−24.0
413.2610.07−3.2−24.1
513.4610.22−3.2−24.1
Rural to moderately urbanized112.989.82−3.2−24.3
212.919.79−3.1−24.2
312.949.81−3.1−24.2
413.019.86−3.2−24.2
513.149.96−3.2−24.3
Highly urbanized114.1710.63−3.5−25.0
214.0710.57−3.5−24.9
314.0410.55−3.5−24.9
414.0510.57−3.5−24.8
514.2110.71−3.5−24.6
1 Urbanicity: rural to moderately urbanized areas (<2000 addresses/km2); highly urbanized (>2000 addresses/km2). 2 Socioeconomic position (SEP) group: quintile scores ranging from the lowest SEP (1) to the highest SEP (5).
Table 4. Differences in the average PM10 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Table 4. Differences in the average PM10 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Urbanicity 1SEP Group 2PM10 (µg/m3)—Mean 2014PM10 (µg/m3)—Mean 2019Absolute DifferenceRelative Difference (%)
Nationwide120.8917.80−3.1−14.8
220.5617.55−3.0−14.6
320.4917.50−3.0−14.6
420.5517.55−3.0−14.6
520.7817.78−3.0−14.4
Rural to moderately urbanized120.1917.08−3.1−15.4
220.1117.04−3.1−15.2
320.1517.09−3.1−15.2
420.2417.16−3.1−15.2
520.3917.30−3.1−15.2
Highly urbanized121.6718.50−3.2−14.6
221.5418.42−3.1−14.5
321.4918.41−3.1−14.3
421.4918.47−3.1−14.1
521.7018.67−3.0−14.0
1 Urbanicity: rural to moderately urbanized areas (<2000 addresses/km2); highly urbanized (>2000 addresses/km2). 2 Socioeconomic position (SEP) group: quintile scores ranging from the lowest SEP (1) to the highest SEP (5).
Table 5. Differences in the average NO2 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Table 5. Differences in the average NO2 concentrations between 2014 and 2019 by socioeconomic position group and urbanicity (2014 to 2019).
Urbanicity 1SEP Group 2NO2 (µg/m3)—Mean 2014NO2 (µg/m3)—Mean 2019Absolute DifferenceRelative Difference (%)
Nationwide121.5318.62−2.9−13.5
219.9717.54−2.4−12.2
319.5917.27−2.3−11.8
419.6817.34−2.3−11.8
520.5218.11−2.4−11.7
Rural to moderately urbanized118.3215.98−2.4−12.8
217.9515.71−2.3−12.5
318.0115.75−2.3−12.5
418.2015.89−2.3−12.7
518.6616.31−2.4−12.6
Highly urbanized125.0721.18−3.9−15.5
224.4320.74−3.7−15.1
324.2320.62−3.6−14.9
424.2920.79−3.5−14.4
524.9121.40−3.5−14.1
1 Urbanicity: rural to moderately urbanized areas (<2000 addresses/km2); highly urbanized (>2000 addresses/km2). 2 Socioeconomic position (SEP) group: quintile scores ranging from the lowest SEP (1) to the highest SEP (5).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlubek, N.; Koop, Y.; Wagtendonk, A.; Vaartjes, I. Temporal Trends in Air Pollution Exposure across Socioeconomic Groups in The Netherlands. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080976

AMA Style

Hlubek N, Koop Y, Wagtendonk A, Vaartjes I. Temporal Trends in Air Pollution Exposure across Socioeconomic Groups in The Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(8):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlubek, Niklas, Yvonne Koop, Alfred Wagtendonk, and Ilonca Vaartjes. 2024. "Temporal Trends in Air Pollution Exposure across Socioeconomic Groups in The Netherlands" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 8: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080976

APA Style

Hlubek, N., Koop, Y., Wagtendonk, A., & Vaartjes, I. (2024). Temporal Trends in Air Pollution Exposure across Socioeconomic Groups in The Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(8), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop