Investigating Older Adults’ Response to Climate Change
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Background
2.1. Climate Change and Low-Carbon Behavior
2.2. Aging and Climate Change
2.2.1. Climate Risks to Older People
2.2.2. Carbon Emissions from Older Adults
2.2.3. Engaging Older People in Climate Action Dialogue
2.2.4. The Main Theories Related to Low-Carbon Behavior and Environmental Awareness of Older People
3. Methodology
3.1. Recruitment and Procedure
3.2. Sampling Strategy
3.3. Materials Used in Focus Groups
- The role of perception in understanding climate change;
- Awareness of terms such as “net zero”, “global warming”, and “climate change”.
- Experiences with low-carbon practices;
- Motivations for adopting low-carbon behaviors.
- Preferred channels and methods for accessing climate change information;
- Strategies for sharing climate change information.
- Personal challenges and aspirations regarding climate change;
- Expectations of society, government, and businesses in addressing climate change.
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Suggestions for Promoting Climate Action
4.1.1. Terminology Old People Can Understand
4.1.2. Cultural Differences and Cultural Integration
4.1.3. Multi-Channel Information Dissemination—By Population Group
4.2. Sharing of Low-Carbon Practices
Promoting Low-Carbon Practices of the Older People—To Inspire More People
4.3. Strategies for Exploring Climate Change
4.3.1. Discuss Climate Change—History, Geography, and Perception
4.3.2. Awaken Awareness of the Natural Environment—Land, Sea, Plants, Disasters, Air, and Animals
4.3.3. For the Next Generation—The Motivation
4.3.4. Attracting Attention with Economic Factors
4.3.5. Provide Guidelines for Learners at Different Stages
4.3.6. How the Message Is Presented—Remind, Warn, Encourage, and Attract
4.3.7. The Importance of Visual Materials
4.4. The Need for Climate Action
4.4.1. The Need for Government Improvements
4.4.2. Sustainability Awareness in Business
4.4.3. Improvements in Industry Support Facilities
5. Discussion
- Individual level: Consistent with the biopsychosocial model, physical health significantly influences older adults’ capacity for low-carbon behaviors. Participants with better mobility engaged more readily in sustainable practices, while those with physical limitations faced greater challenges. Self-efficacy, as highlighted by social cognitive theory, also plays a vital role; older adults with confidence in using green technologies were more likely to adopt low-carbon lifestyles, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to enhance their technological confidence.
- Social level: Aligned with social-ecological systems theory, this study demonstrates the influence of community support on climate engagement. Local environmental initiatives and intergenerational dialogue were pivotal, with participants reporting knowledge exchange with younger family members, strengthening both climate awareness and intergenerational bonds.
- Cultural level: Value-belief-norm theory explains the role of cultural values, such as frugality and resource conservation, in shaping sustainable behaviors. Immigrant participants enriched discussions by introducing diverse low-carbon practices from their home countries, highlighting the potential of cross-cultural exchange for global climate strategies.
- Policy level: Rational choice theory underscores the importance of economic incentives and inclusive policies. While participants acknowledged the role of reward and penalty systems in encouraging sustainable behaviors, they also pointed out significant barriers, such as the high costs of green technologies like solar panels. Dissatisfaction with policy transparency and coherence further emphasized the need for systemic support tailored to older adults’ financial constraints.
Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Filiberto, D.; Wethington, E.; Pillemer, K.; Wells, N.; Wysocki, M.; Parise, J.T. Older people and climate change: Vulnerability and health effects. Generations 2009, 33, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
- Wells, V.K.; Ponting, C.A.; Peattie, K. Behaviour and climate change: Consumer perceptions of responsibility. J. Mark. Manag. 2011, 27, 808–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shwom, R.; Bidwell, D.; Dan, A.; Dietz, T. Understanding US public support for domestic climate change policies. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoppner, C.; Whitmarsh, L.; Whitmarsh, L.; O’Neill, S.; Lorenzoni, I. Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication. In Earthscan; Routledge: London, UK, 2011; pp. 47–65. [Google Scholar]
- Thunberg, G. No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference; Penguin Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Pais-Magalhães, V.; Moutinho, V.; Robaina, M. Is an ageing population impacting energy use in the European Union? Drivers, lifestyles, and consumption patterns of elderly households. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 85, 102443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, S.; Ma, M. How does population aging affect household carbon emissions? Evidence from Chinese urban and rural areas. Energy Econ. 2021, 100, 105356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasse, T.; Rutter, J.; Norris, E.; Shepheard, M. Net Zero: How Government Can Meet Its Climate Change Target; Institute for Government: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Poortinga, W.; Whitmarsh, L.; Capstick, S.; Pidgeon, N.; Evans, G. Exploring Age-Related Perceptions of Climate Action: How Younger and Older Generations View the Net-Zero Target. J. Environ. Psychol. 2024, 78, 102443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poortinga, W.; Whitmarsh, L.; Steentjes, K.; Gray, E.; Thompson, S.; Brisley, R. Factors and framing effects in support for net zero policies in the United Kingdom. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1287188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietz, T.; Shwom, R.L.; Whitley, C.T. Climate change and society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2020, 46, 135–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benevolenza, M.A.; DeRigne, L. The impact of climate change and natural disasters on vulnerable populations: A systematic review of literature. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2019, 29, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillemer, K.; Cope, M.T.; Nolte, J. Older People and Action on Climate Change: A Powerful But Underutilized Resource; Commissioned Report for HelpAge International; United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Haq, G. Growing old in a changing climate. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017, 27, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNamara, T.K.; Gonzales, E. Volunteer transitions among older adults: The role of human, social, and cultural capital in later life. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2011, 66, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cool, L.E. Ethnic identity: A source of community esteem for the elderly. Anthropol. Q. 1981, 54, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009, 29, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, S.; Allwood, J.M. Technology or behaviour? Balanced disruption in the race to net zero emissions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 78, 102124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmichael, R. Behaviour Change, Public Engagement and Net Zero. A Report for the Committee on Climate Change. 2019. Available online: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publications/ (accessed on 31 October 2024).
- Skidmore, C. Mission Zero: Independent Review of the UK Government’s Approach to Delivering Net Zero; UK Government: London, UK, 2022.
- Cutler, J.; Nitschke, J.P.; Lamm, C.; Lockwood, P.L. Older adults across the globe exhibit increased prosocial behavior but also greater in-group preferences. Nat. Aging 2021, 1, 880–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carstensen, L.L. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol. Aging 1992, 7, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunlap, R.E.; Jones, R.E. Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handb. Environ. Sociol. 2002, 3, 482–524. [Google Scholar]
- Haines, A.; Kovats, R.S.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Corvalán, C. Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health 2006, 120, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasper, R.; Blohm, A.; Ruth, M. Social and economic impacts of climate change on the urban environment. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arbuthnott, K.G.; Hajat, S. The health effects of hotter summers and heat waves in the population of the United Kingdom: A review of the evidence. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rustemeyer, N.; Howells, M. Excess mortality in England during the 2019 summer heatwaves. Climate 2021, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMichael, A.J.; Woodruff, R.E.; Hales, S. Climate change and human health: Present and future risks. Lancet 2006, 367, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paavola, J. Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Nations; Department of Economic; Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/430). 2019. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3509065 (accessed on 9 December 2023).
- Pillemer, K.A.; Nolte, J.; Tillema Cope, M. Promoting climate change activism among older people. Generations 2022, 46, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Age, UK. Parliamentary Briefing: The Energy Crisis and Supporting Older People this Winter. 2021. Available online: https://www.ageuk.org.uk/siteassets/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/energy-crisis-parliamentary-briefing—december-2021.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2025).
- Woolrych, R.; Haq, G.; Latter, B. Healthy Ageing in a Changing Climate: Creating Inclusive, Age-Friendly, and Climate Resilient Cities and Communities in the UK. PlaceAge Project. 2023. Available online: https://www.sei.org/publications/healthy-ageing-changing-climate/ (accessed on 6 January 2025).
- Government of UK. Green Homes Grant Scheme: Improving Energy Efficiency for Homes. 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/greenhomesgrant (accessed on 6 January 2025).
- Ivanova, D.; Stadler, K.; Steen-Olsen, K.; Wood, R.; Vita, G.; Tukker, A.; Hertwich, E.G. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, Y.; Feng, J.; Sun, A.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y. Structural Characteristics of the Household Carbon Footprint in an Aging Society. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, D.A.; Lorek, S. Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. J. Consum. Policy 2005, 28, 261–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, A.C.; Hung, Y.; Olthof, M.R.; Verbeke, W.; Brouwer, I.A. Older consumers’ readiness to accept alternative, more sustainable protein sources in the European Union. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Disney, R. Can We Afford to Grow Older?: A Perspective on the Economics of Aging; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Luiu, C.; Tight, M.; Burrow, M. Factors preventing the use of alternative transport modes to the car in later life. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wu, W.; He, Q.; Li, C. Public transport use among the urban and rural elderly in China: Effects of personal, attitudinal, household, social-environment and built-environment factors. J. Transp. Land Use 2018, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayalon, L.; Ulitsa, N.; AboJabel, H.; Engdau, S. Older persons’ perceptions concerning climate activism and pro-environmental behaviors: Results from a qualitative study of diverse population groups of older Israelis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chazan, M.; Baldwin, M. Granny solidarity: Understanding age and generational dynamics in climate justice movements. Stud. Soc. Justice 2019, 13, 244–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornsey, M.J. The role of worldviews in shaping how people appraise climate change. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2021, 42, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, E.A. Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, I.R. Growing Older: Tourism and Leisure Behaviour of Older Adults; Cabi: Wallingford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Bengtson, V.L.; Elder, G.H., Jr.; Putney, N.M. The life course perspective on ageing: Linked lives, timing, and history. In Adult Lives: A Life Course Perspective; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 9–17. [Google Scholar]
- Pillemer, K.; Filiberto, D. Mobilizing older people to address climate change. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017, 27, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wethington, E.; Moen, P.; Glasgow, N.; Pillemer, K. Multiple roles, social integration, and health. In Social Integration in the Second Half of Life; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Petriwskyj, A. Diversity, inclusion, and the voice of older people: Engagement and decision-making in seniors’ organizations. Int. J. Public Adm. 2018, 41, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutterman, A.S. Older Persons and Climate Action; Available at SSRN 4307011; HelpAge International: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, D.S.; Twyman, C. Equity and justice in climate change adaptation amongst natural-resource-dependent societies. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2005, 15, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sovacool, B.K.; Del Rio, D.D.F. Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyball, R.; Brown, V.A.; Keen, M. Towards sustainability: Five strands of social learning. In Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World; Wageningen Academic: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 181–194. [Google Scholar]
- Terry, G. No climate justice without gender justice: An overview of the issues. Gend. Dev. 2009, 17, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adger, W.N. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ. Geogr. 2003, 79, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings Psychol. Cult. 2011, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katey, D.; Zanu, S. Climate change and population aging: The role of older adults in climate change mitigation. J. Aging Stud. 2024, 71, 101274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayalon, L.; Roy, S.; Aloni, O.; Keating, N. A scoping review of research on older people and intergenerational relations in the context of climate change. Gerontologist 2023, 63, 945–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bals, C.; Warner, K.; Butzengeiger, S. Insuring the uninsurable: Design options for a climate change funding mechanism. In Climate Change and Insurance; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 637–647. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, D.R.; Adger, W.N.; Brown, K. Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32, 395–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nisbet, M.C. Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In Doing News Framing Analysis; Routledge: London, UK, 2010; pp. 59–99. [Google Scholar]
- Schlosberg, D.; Collins, L.B.; Niemeyer, S. Adaptation policy and community discourse: Risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environ. Politics 2017, 26, 413–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archer, M.; Tritter, J. Rational choice theory. In Resisting Colonization; Routledge: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Schunk, D.H. Social Cognitive Theory; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- He, Y.; Xu, F.; Wang, L.; Nguyen, H. Modeling tourists’ pro-environmental behavior: A combination of the value-belief-norm theory and environmental identity theory. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2024, 67, 3694–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehman, B.J.; David, D.M.; Gruber, J.A. Rethinking the biopsychosocial model of health: Understanding health as a dynamic system. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2017, 11, e12328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, S. The pragmatic holism of social–ecological systems theory: Explaining adaptive capacity in a changing climate. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2021, 45, 1580–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas, H.; Oliveira, M.; Jenkins, M.; Popjoy, O. The Focus Group, a qualitative research method. J. Educ. 1998, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Kitzinger, J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995, 311, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennink, M.M. Focus Group Discussions; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, S.; Greenwood, M.; Prior, S.; Shearer, T.; Walkem, K.; Young, S.; Bywaters, D.; Walker, K. Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. J. Res. Nurs. 2020, 25, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryman, A. Social Research Methods, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Terry, G.; Hayfield, N.; Clarke, V.; Braun, V. Thematic analysis. Sage Handb. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2017, 2, 25. [Google Scholar]
- Adger, W.N.; Barnett, J.; Brown, K.; Marshall, N.; O’brien, K. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunarathne, A.N.; Kaluarachchilage, P.K.H.; Rajasooriya, S.M. Low-carbon consumer behaviour in climate-vulnerable developing countries: A case study of Sri Lanka. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 154, 104592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borenstein, S. Private net benefits of residential solar PV: The role of electricity tariffs, tax incentives, and rebates. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2017, 4, S85–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Sample (%) |
---|---|
Female | 60 |
Male | 40 |
Age | |
60–70 | 33 |
71–80 | 53 |
81–85 | 13 |
Race | |
White | 83 |
Asian | 13 |
Black | 3 |
Climate-related knowledge | |
No knowledge | 3 |
Basic knowledge | 40 |
Moderate knowledge | 46 |
Advanced knowledge | 10 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ni, Q.; Dong, H.; Kaniadakis, A.; Wang, Z.; Ge, C. Investigating Older Adults’ Response to Climate Change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020154
Ni Q, Dong H, Kaniadakis A, Wang Z, Ge C. Investigating Older Adults’ Response to Climate Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(2):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020154
Chicago/Turabian StyleNi, Qing, Hua Dong, Antonios Kaniadakis, Zhili Wang, and Chang Ge. 2025. "Investigating Older Adults’ Response to Climate Change" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 2: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020154
APA StyleNi, Q., Dong, H., Kaniadakis, A., Wang, Z., & Ge, C. (2025). Investigating Older Adults’ Response to Climate Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020154