Chemical Analysis of Nutritional Content of Prickly Pads (Opuntia ficus indica) at Varied Ages in an Organic Harvest
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Preparation
2.2. Washed and Dry Vacuum Process
2.3. Chemical Approximate Analysis
2.4. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)
2.5. Mass Spectrometry ICP-MS
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- OMS; Departamento de inocuidad de los alimentos; Organización mundial de la salud. Biotecnología moderna de los alimentos, salud y desarrollo humano: estudio basado en evidencias; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Betancourt-Domínguez, MA; Hernández-Pérez, T; García-Saucedo, P; Cruz-Hernández, A; Paredes-López, O. Physico-chemical changes in cladodes (nopalitos) from cultivated and wild cacti (Opuntia spp.). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr 2006, 61, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
- Piga, A. Cactus pear, a fruit of nutraceutical and functional importance. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus. Dev 2004, 6, 9–22. [Google Scholar]
- Le Houérou, HN. The role of cacti (Opuntia spp.) in erosion control, land reclamation, rehabilitation and agricultural development in the Mediterranean Basin. J. Arid Environ 1996, 33, 135–159. [Google Scholar]
- Periago, MJ; Ros, G; López, G; Martínez, MC; Rincón, F. The dietary fiber components and their physiological effects. Rev. Esp. Ciencia Tecnol. Aliment 1993, 33, 229–246. [Google Scholar]
- Sáenz, HC. Cladodes: A source of dietary fiber. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus. Dev 1997, 2, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
- Reid, IR; Ames, RW; Evans, MC; Gamble, GD; Sharpe, SJ. Long-term effects of calcium supplementation on bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Med 1995, 98, 331–335. [Google Scholar]
- Palumbo, B; Efthimiou, Y; Stamatopoulos, J; Oguogho, A; Budinsky, A; Palumbo, R; Sinziger, H. Prickly pear induces upregulation of liver LDL binding in familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia. Nucl. Med. Rev 2003, 6, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
- Feugang, JM; Konarski, P; Zou, D; Stintzing, FC; Zou, C. Nutritional and medicinal use of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) cladodes and fruits. Front. Biosc 2006, 11, 2574–2589. [Google Scholar]
- Gebremariam, T; Melaku, S; Yami, A. Effect of different levels of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) inclusion on feed intake, digestibility and body weight gain in tef (Eragrostis tef) straw-based feeding of sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech 2006, 131, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-García, ME; De Lira, C; Hernández-Becerra, E; Cornejo-Villegas, MA; Palacios-Fonseca, AJ; Rojas-Molina, I; Reynoso, R; Quintero, LC; Del real, A; Zepeda, TA. Physicochemical characterization of prickly pads (Opuntia ficus indica) and dry vacuum prickly pads powders as a function of the maturation. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr 2007, 62, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
- Saenz, C. Processing technologies: An alternative for cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) fruits and cladodes. J. Arid Environ 2000, 46, 209–225. [Google Scholar]
- Stintzing, FC; Carle, R. Cactus stems (Opuntia spp.): A review on their chemistry, technology, and uses. Mol. Nutr. Food Res 2005, 49, 175–194. [Google Scholar]
- Stintzing, FC; Schieber, A; Carle, R. Phytochemical and nutritional significance of cactus pear. Eur. Food Res. Technol 2001, 212, 396–407. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, CM. Nutritional quality of organic food: Shades of grey or shades of green? Proc. Nutr. Soc 2002, 61, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
- Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.
- A Guide to the Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
- Geankoplis, CJ. Procesos de Transporte y Operaciones Unitarias, 4th ed.; Compañía Editorial Continental: México City, México, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y-C; Pyo, Y-H; Ahn, C-K; Kim, S-H. Food functionality of Opuntia ficus-indica var. cultivated in Jeju Island. J. Food Sci. Nutr 2005, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Nobel, PS; Israel, AA. Cladode development, environmental responses of CO2 uptake, and productivity for Opuntia ficus-indica under elevated CO2. J. Exp. Bot 1994, 45, 295–303. [Google Scholar]
- Drennan, PM; Nobel, PS. Responses of CAM species to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Plant Cell Environ 2000, 23, 767–781. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilar, BG; Peña, VCB. Alteraciones fisiológicas provocadas por sequía en nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica). Rev. Fitotec. Mex 2006, 29, 231–237. [Google Scholar]
- Granados Sánchez, D; Castañeda Pérez, AD. El Nopal Historia, Fisiología, Genética e Importancia Frutícola; Trillas: México City, México, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Frati, MAC; Xilotl, DN; Altamirano, P; Ariza, R; López, LR. The effect of two sequential doses of estreptacantha upon glycemia. Arch. Invest. Med 1991, 22, 333–336. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Pérez, T; Carrillo López, A; Guevara-Lara, F; Cruz-Hernández, A; Paredes-López, O. Biochemical and nutritional characterization of three prickly pear species with different ripening behavior. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr 2005, 60, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Gallegos-Infante, JA; Rocha-Guzman, NE; González-Laredo, RF; Reynoso-Camacho, R; Medina-Torres, L; Cervantes-Cardozo, V. Effect of air flow rate on the polyphenols content and antioxidant capacity of convective dried cactus pear cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr 2009, 60, 80–87. [Google Scholar]
- Guevara-Figueroa, T; Jiménez-Islas, H; Reyes-Escogido, ML; Mortensen, AG; Laursen, BB; Lin, L-W; De León-Rodríguez, A; Fomsgaard, IS; Barba de la Rosa, AP. Proximate composition, phenolic acids, and flavonoids characterization of commercial and wild nopal (Opuntia spp.). J. Food Compos. Anal 2010, 23, 525–532. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Felix, A; Cantwell, M. Developmental changes in composition and quality of prickly pear cactus cladodes (nopalitos). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr 1988, 38, 83–93. [Google Scholar]
Prickly pads age (days) | Prickly pads weight (g) | Moisture (g) | Ash (g) | Fat (g) | Crude Fiber (g) | Protein (g) | Carbohydrates(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 | 100 | 5.03 cd | 17.65 a | 2.16 e | 11.00 a | 7.07 b | 42.94 a |
50 | 150 | 8.81 e | 19.59 b | 2.37 f | 13.26 b | 8.99 e | 53.04 b |
60 | 200 | 5.43 d | 20.64 c | 2.38 f | 16.14 c | 8.39 d | 53.01 b |
70 | 250 | 4.85 bcd | 21.09 d | 1.62 bc | 19.03 d | 8.92 e | 55.53 d |
80 | 300 | 4.36 ab | 21.64 e | 1.53 ab | 18.73 d | 7.25 b | 53.53 bc |
90 | 350 | 4.81 bc | 21.92 f | 1.50 ab | 19.12 d | 7.78 c | 55.15 cd |
100 | 400 | 4.08 a | 22.80 g | 1.42 a | 20.11 de | 8.29 d | 56.73 d |
115 | 450 | 4.58 abc | 22.91 h | 1.72 c | 21.48 e | 8.48 d | 59.20 e |
125 | 500 | 4.35 ab | 20.91 i | 1.70 c | 19.85 d | 5.85 a | 52.67 b |
135 | 550 | 4.18 a | 24.30 j | 1.87 d | 23.33 f | 7.07 b | 60.77 e |
Maturity stage (age-days) (mg/g) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mineral | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 115 | 125 | 135 |
Phosphorus | 2.59 a | 4.26 b | 4.48 b | 4.39 b | 4.06 b | 4.60 b | 3.77 abc | 5.00 c | 3.15 a | 3.94 c |
Manganese | 0.29 | 0.06 a | 0.07 a | 0.05 a | 0.08 a | 0.05 a | 0.05 a | 0.05 a | 0.03 a | 0.08 a |
Iron | 0.09 a | 0.09 a | 0.10 a | 0.12 b | 0.12 b | 0.134 b | 0.132 bc | 0.14 c | 0.16 | 0.22 |
Zinc | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
Magnesium | 8.80 a | 10.60 e | 11.20 f | 11.5 g | 10.2 d | 12.00 h | 11.00 f | 11.95 h | 8.95 b | 9.55 c |
Calcium | 17.95 | 22.10 a | 24.00 a | 27.00 b | 28.35 bc | 28.65 bc | 29.20 bc | 29.15 c | 30.70 c | 34.40 |
Potassium | 55.20 a | 64.75 bc | 70.90 d | 68.50 bcd | 72.20 d | 69.70 cd | 69.95 d | 71.45 d | 51.80 a | 63.35 b |
Sodium | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.30 |
Maturity stage (age-days) (mg/100g) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mineral | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 115 | 125 | 135 |
Lithium | 0.80 | 0.23 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.99 | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.29 |
Vanadium | 0.33 a | 1.43 b | 1.61 b | 1.66 b | 2.27 b | 2.19 b | 2.07 ab | 0.68 a | 0.94 | 0.79 a |
Cobalt | 0.16 a | 0.13 ab | 0.15 abc | 0.14 bde | 0.18 c | 0.12 d | 0.10 de | 0.15 de | 0.11 e | 0.21 |
Arsenic | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.007 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.002 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Selenium | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.001 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Cadmium | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
Thallium | 0.07 | 0.06 a | 0.06 a | 0.06 a | 0.06 a | 0.06 a | 0.06 a | 0.07 a | 0.82 | 0.06 |
© 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
Hernández-Urbiola, M.I.; Pérez-Torrero, E.; Rodríguez-García, M.E. Chemical Analysis of Nutritional Content of Prickly Pads (Opuntia ficus indica) at Varied Ages in an Organic Harvest. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051287
Hernández-Urbiola MI, Pérez-Torrero E, Rodríguez-García ME. Chemical Analysis of Nutritional Content of Prickly Pads (Opuntia ficus indica) at Varied Ages in an Organic Harvest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2011; 8(5):1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051287
Chicago/Turabian StyleHernández-Urbiola, Margarita I., Esther Pérez-Torrero, and Mario E. Rodríguez-García. 2011. "Chemical Analysis of Nutritional Content of Prickly Pads (Opuntia ficus indica) at Varied Ages in an Organic Harvest" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8, no. 5: 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051287
APA StyleHernández-Urbiola, M. I., Pérez-Torrero, E., & Rodríguez-García, M. E. (2011). Chemical Analysis of Nutritional Content of Prickly Pads (Opuntia ficus indica) at Varied Ages in an Organic Harvest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051287