Next Article in Journal
A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity
Next Article in Special Issue
Does the Exchange Rate and Its Volatility Matter for International Trade in Ethiopia?
Previous Article in Journal
Expectations Concordance and Stock Market Volatility: Knightian Uncertainty in the Year of the Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Labour Market Effects of International Trade in the Presence of Vertical Product Differentiation: Some Methodological Remarks in Retrospect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whose Policy Uncertainty Matters in the Trade between Korea and the U.S.?

by
Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
1,* and
Jungho Baek
2
1
Department of Economics and The Center for Research on International Economics, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
2
Department of Economics, School of Management, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14(11), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110520
Submission received: 19 August 2021 / Revised: 18 October 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published: 1 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue International Trade Theory and Policy)

Abstract

:
Since the introduction of the news-based policy uncertainty measure, a few studies have looked at its impact on trade flows by using panel models and aggregate trade data. In this paper we consider the short-run and long-run response of 61 2-digit U.S. exporting industries to Korea and 49 2-digit Korean exporting industries to the U.S. to policy uncertainty measures of the U.S. and Korea. We find that both measures have short-run effects on exports of almost one-third of industries in either direction. In the long run, however, while nine U.S. exporting industries (with a trade share of 9%) are negatively affected by the Korean uncertainty measure, only five industries (with 6% export share) are affected by the U.S. uncertainty measure. As for the Korean exporting industries, we find that three industries with a 31% export share are affected positively by the Korean uncertainty measure and six industries with a 7% export share are affected positively by the U.S. uncertainty measure.
JEL Classifications:
F14; F40; F50

1. Introduction

When the international monetary system shifted from fixed to relatively more flexible exchange rates in March 1973, a new area in international economics began emerging where researchers became interested in the impact of exchange rate uncertainty or volatility on trade flows among countries. Bahmani-Oskooee and Hegerty (2007) is the latest review article on the topic. However, exchange rate uncertainty is not the only factor that may hurt trade flows. Exchange rate uncertainty or volatility could coincide with other uncertain factors that could hurt trade flows at the same time. One such measure is nothing but economic policy uncertainty, which is news-based. The measure introduced by Baker et al. (2016) captures the effects of all uncertain factors. In every country for which the measure is constructed, they search highly circulated news associated with policy uncertainty issues. Some examples of the terms searched for are: “policy”, “tax”, “spending”, “regulation”, “central bank”, “budget”, “deficit”, “trade”, “terrorism”, etc. The terms such as “uncertain” or “uncertainty” are included in all searches. From the volume of the terms collected, a normalized index of uncertainty known as “Policy Uncertainty” is constructed. To learn about the path of this measure for the U.S. and Korea, we plot them in Figure 1. The spark towards the end of our study period reflects the appearance of the Covid-19 pandemic in both countries.
Since the introduction of the policy uncertainty measure, researchers have begun to assess its impact on different macro variables. To cite some, Baker et al. (2016) themselves assessed its impact on domestic economic activity to show its adverse impact. Wang et al. (2014) assessed the response of corporate investment to the new uncertainty measure. On the other hand, Pastor and Veronesi (2013), Ko and Lee (2015), and Brogaard and Detzel (2015) investigated the response of risk premium and market returns to policy uncertainty, Kang and Ratti (2013), as well as Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (2018) and Istiak and Alam (2019), investigated the response of oil prices to the policy uncertainty measure. Furthermore, while Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (2016) assessed the impact of policy uncertainty on the demand for money in the U.S., Bahmani-Oskooee and Ghodsi (2017) considered the response of house prices in each state of the U.S., and Bahmani-Oskooee and Hasanzade (2021) looked at its impact on income distribution in each state in the U.S. To see more, one could consult the review article by Al-Thaqeb and Algharabali (2019).1
As far as the response of trade flows to the policy uncertainty measure is concerned, the literature is in its infancy and includes only Armelius et al. (2014), Han et al. (2016), and Tam (2018). Armelius et al. (2014) showed that U.S. economic policy uncertainty hurts aggregate global trade. Similarly, using a panel model that included trade data from 31 countries over the period 1999–2012, Han et al. (2016) discovered adverse effects of U.S. economic policy uncertainty. Finally, Tam (2018) employed a global vector autoregressive (GVAR) trade model, which is a panel model that included a total of 45 countries. By relying upon impulse response functions, the author finds that US policy uncertainty affects global trade flows significantly and strongly, largely due to its indirect trade linkages with the rest of the world. By contrast, China’s economic policy uncertainty shock exhibits statistically significant impacts on exports and imports of its own as well as other economies, although not as pronounced as those arising from US economic policy shock.
Our main purpose in this paper is to consider trade flows between Korea and the U.S. and to try to determine whose policy uncertainty affects their trade flows more. To reduce aggregation bias embodied in the above studies, we adhere to time-series data between Korea and the U.S. To reduce the aggregation bias further, we use data at the industry level. Monthly data from 61 2-digit U.S. exporting industries to Korea and 49 2-digit Korean industries exporting to the U.S. over the period 2000M1–2020M7 are used to carry out the empirical exercise. The rest of the study is organized in the following manner: In Section 2 we introduce the models and estimation method, which is followed by our empirical results in Section 3. We then provide a summary in Section 4 that is followed by an Appendix A in which we provide sources of the data and definition of the variables.

2. The Models and Methods

A common practice in the literature to formulate a country’s export and import demand model is to include a measure of economic activity and a measure of relative prices as two major determinants of a trade flow model. Indeed, such models are used to estimate the so-called Marshall-Lerner Condition.2 As such we borrow those models and after adding the two policy uncertainty measures, we begin with the following specifications:
L n X i , t U S = α ο + α 1 L n Y t K O R + α 2 L n R E X t + α 3 L n P U t U S + α 4 L n P U t K O R + ε t
L n M i , t U S = β ο + β 1 L n Y t U S + β 2 L n R E X t + β 3 L n P U t U S + β 4 L n P U t K O R + μ t
Equation (1) outlines determinants of the U.S. export of commodity i to Korea denoted by XiUS. As can be seen, the level of economic activity in Korea (YKOR), the real won-dollar rate (REX), the U.S. economic policy uncertainty (PUUS), and the Korean economic policy uncertainty (PUKOR) are included to be the main determinants of the U.S. exports to Korea. As the Korean economy grows, we expect Korea to import more from the U.S.; hence, we expect an estimate of α1 to be positive. Finally, the real bilateral exchange rate is defined as REX = (NEX*CPIUS)/CPIKOR where NEX is the nominal exchange rate defined as the number of won per US dollar, CPIUS is the price level in the United States and CPIKOR is the price level in Korea. Thus, a decline in REX reflects a real depreciation of the US dollar. If dollar depreciation is to boost the U.S. exports to Korea, we expect an estimate of α2 to be negative. Finally, if an increase in either measure of policy uncertainty is to hurt the U.S. export, estimates of α3 and α4 are expected to be negative.
Following the above logic and reasoning, we identify determinants of the U.S. import of commodity i from Korea, MiUS, (or Korean export of commodity i to the U.S.) in Equation (2). These determinants are the level of economic activity in the U.S. (YUS), the REX, and two policy uncertainty measures. As the U.S. economy grows, since it imports more from Korea, an estimate of β1 is expected to be positive, and if dollar depreciation is to reduce U.S. imports of commodity ii from Korea, an estimate of β2 is expected to be positive. Finally, if either uncertainty measure is to hurt Korean exports to the U.S., estimates of β3 and β4 are expected to be negative.
The next step in our modeling approach is to convert (1) and (2) to an error-correction format so that we can also estimate the short-run effects of all exogenous variables on the dependent variables. Pesaran et al.’s (2001) ARDL bounds testing approach has a unique advantage of estimating the short-run and long-run effects in one step. We follow their approach and rely upon the following error-correction models:
Δ L n X i , t U S = a 1 + j = 1 n 1 a 2 j Δ L n X i , t j U S + j = 0 n 2 a 3 j Δ L n Y t j K O R + j = 0 n 3 a 4 j Δ L n R E X t j + j = 0 n 4 a 5 j Δ L n P U t j U S   + j = 0 n 5 a 6 j Δ L n P U t j K O R + θ 0 L n X i , t 1 U S + θ 1 L n Y t 1 K O R + θ 2 L n R E X t 1 + θ 3 L n P U t 1 U S + θ 4 L n P U t 1 K O R + ψ t  
Δ L n M i , t U S = b 1 + j = 1 n 5 b 2 j Δ L n M i , t j U S + j = 0 n 6 b 3 j Δ L n Y t j U S + j = 0 n 7 b 4 j Δ L n R E X t j + j = 0 n 8 b 5 j Δ L n P U t j U S + j = 0 n 9 b 6 j Δ L n P U t j K O R + ρ 0 L n M i , t 1 U S + ρ 1 L n Y t 1 U S + ρ 2 L n R E X t 1 + ρ 3 L n P U t 1 U S + ρ 4 L n P U t 1 K O R + ϕ t
Once (3) and (4) are estimated by the OLS technique, short-run effects of any of the exogenous variables are judged by the estimates of coefficients attached to first-differenced variables, and long-run effects are inferred by the estimates of θ1–θ4 normalized on −θ0 in (3) and estimates of ρ 1 ρ 4 normalized on ρ 0 in (4). To validate the long-run estimates, Pesaran et al. (2001) introduce two cointegration tests. The F test is proposed to establish the joint significance of lagged level variables and the t-test is suggested to establish the significance of θ0 in (3) and ρ 0 in (4).3 Pesaran et al. (2001) demonstrate that the distribution of both tests is non-standard; hence, they tabulate new critical values for both tests. Since the critical values account for integrating properties of the variables, there is no need for pre-unit-root testing and variables could be a combination of I(0) and I(1), which are the properties of the majority of macro variables, and this is another advantage of this approach.4

3. Empirical Results

In this section, we estimate model (3) for each of the 61 2-digit U.S. exporting industries to Korea and model (4) for each of the 49 2-digit Korean exporting industries to the U.S. by using monthly data over the period 2000M1–2020M7. A maximum of eight lags are imposed on each first-differenced variable and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) is used to select an optimum specification in each case. Since the study period includes the global financial crisis of 2008, a dummy variable is included to account for it. Industries in which the dummy is significant are identified in the tables. Additionally, we have collected all required critical values in the notes to each table and used them to identify significant estimates and diagnostic statistics. We first report estimates of the U.S. export demand model to Korea in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.
Due to the volume of the short-run estimates, we restrict ourselves to reporting short-run estimates attached to economic policy uncertainty variables. Those attached to ΔLnPUKOR are reported in Table 1 and estimates attached to ΔLnPUUS in Table 2. From Table 1 we gather that the Korean uncertainty measure carries at least one lagged significant coefficient in a total of 24 industries, implying that it has significant short-run effects. The comparable number for the U.S. policy uncertainty measure in Table 2 is 20. Thus, it appears that the Korean policy uncertainty measure has relatively more significant short-run effects on the U.S. exports to Korea than the U.S.’s own uncertainty measure. In how many industries do short-run effects translate into the long run? The answer is provided by Table 3 where we learn that the the Korean policy uncertainty measure carries a significant coefficient in 9 industries coded 05, 25, 29, 51, 58, 67, 69, 79, and 93.5 While in two industries (51 and 67) the coefficient estimate is positive, in the remaining seven industries it is negative. The aggregate trade share of these seven industries from Table 3 happens to be almost 9%, implying that only 9% of the U.S. exports to Korea is hurt by increased policy uncertainty in Korea. As for the long-run effects of the U.S. policy uncertainty, it carries a significant coefficient in industries coded as 02, 29, 58, 73, 76, and 87. While in the first three industries the estimate is positive, in the last three industries it is negative. One of the large industries, i.e., 87 (professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, n.e.s. with 4.707% trade share) is in the last group. In this case, the aggregate share of the three industries that are hurt is almost 6%. Therefore, even in the long run, an increase in Korean policy uncertainty is relatively more harmful to the U.S. exports to Korea, though the affected trade is small and marginal.6
Reported in Table 4 are a few additional diagnostic statistics. To make sure that the residuals in each model do not suffer from first-order serial correlation, we report the Lagrange multiplier test as LM, which is distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom. As can be seen, it is insignificant in most industries, supporting autocorrelation-free residuals. The Ramsey RESET test is also reported as RESET and is used to identify misspecified models. This statistic is also distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom. Again, since it is insignificant in most industries, the majority of optimum models are correctly specified. To establish stability of short-run and long-run coefficient estimates we apply the CUSUM and CUSUMSQ tests to the residuals of each model. Stable estimates are indicated by “S” and unstable ones by “US”. As can be seen, there are hardly any unstable estimates. Finally, we report the size of adjusted R2 to judge the goodness of the fit in each model.
Next, we consider estimates of the U.S. import demand model (4) or the Korean exports to the U.S. Again, results are reported in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8. From Table 5 and Table 6 we gather that the Korean economic policy uncertainty has significant short-run effects on exports of 26 Korean industries exporting to the U.S., whereas the U.S. policy uncertainty has significant effects only in 16 industries. Thus, it appears that Korea’s own uncertainty measure has significant short-run effects in relatively more industries than the U.S. uncertainty measure. From Table 7 and Table 8, however, we learn that short-run effects of the Korean policy uncertainty last into the long run only in industries 72 (machinery specialized for particular industries with 3.804% trade share), 78 (road vehicles with 27.34% trade share), and 88 (photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc. with 0.215% trade share). In the first two industries, the coefficient is positive, implying that an increase in Korean policy uncertainty boosts a total of 31.14% of Korean exports to the U.S. This could be the case if increased uncertainty in Korea makes U.S. importers more concerned for the future; hence, they import more today to avoid any future delay in delivery, production, and distribution. As for the U.S. policy uncertainty, it carries a significant coefficient in industries coded as 05, 28, 51, 71, 73, and 87. While in industry 28 (metalliferous ores and metal scrap with 0.021% trade share) the estimate is negative, in the reaming five industries it is positive. Since the aggregate trade share of these remaining five industries is 7.1%, increased uncertainty in the U.S. will boost almost 7% of Korean exports to the U.S.7

4. Summary and Conclusions

The most comprehensive measure of uncertainty in every country is said to be the new policy uncertainty measure introduced by Baker et al. (2016). This news-based measure captures all uncertainties associated with economic or political factors, and since its introduction, researchers have tried to assess its impact on different macro variables such as stock returns, oil prices, domestic investment, capital flows, demand for money, the housing market, etc.
In this paper, we consider the trade flows between Korea and the U.S. and try to find out whose policy uncertainty measure has relatively more effects on each country’s exports to the other. Depending on the availability of the data, we include 61 2-digit U.S. exporting industries to Korea and 49 2-digit Korean exporting industries to the U.S. Monthly data over the period 2000M1—2020M7 are used to carry out the empirical analysis. Our results could be best summarized by saying that both uncertainty measures had significant short-run negative effects on 1/3rd of the industries exporting from the U.S. to Korea and from Korea to the U.S. However, short-run effects lasted into the long run in a limited number of industries. More precisely, Korean policy uncertainty had significantly negative long-run effects on 9 U.S. exporting industries which engaged in 9% of exports whereas, the U.S. policy uncertainty had negative effects in five industries which engaged in only 6% of exports. As for the effects of both uncertainty measure on the U.S. imports from Korea or Korean exports to the U.S., we found that again, both measures had significant short-run effects in almost one-third of the industries. Short-run effects were translated into the long run in three industries as far as the effects of the Korean uncertainty is concerned and in six industries as far as the U.S. policy uncertainty measure is concerned. An interesting finding is that both uncertainty measures had positive effects on Korean exports to the U.S., and while the total share of industries affected by the Korean uncertainty measure was 31%, that of the industries affected by the U.S. uncertainty measure was 7%. Thus, increase uncertainty in Korea induces the U.S. importers to import more. This could be the case if the U.S. importers expect political and economic situations in Korea to get worse as a result of increased uncertainty. For example, a small threat by North Korea will make the South Korean policy uncertainty measure rise. If this is perceived by the U.S. importers as a serious long-lasting threat, they will import more in order not to experience disturbance in their sales, delivery, and production. It should be noted that in the exchange rate uncertainty trade literature, the new direction is to assess the possibility of an asymmetric response of trade flows to a measure of exchange rate uncertainty advanced by Bahmani-Oskooee and Aftab (2017). Future research should investigate the possibility of asymmetric effects of policy uncertainty on trade flows.

Author Contributions

Both authors have contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Valuable comments of three anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated. Remaining errors, however, are our own.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Data Definitions and Sources

Monthly data over 2000M1–2020M7 are used to carry out the empirical analysis. The data sources are as follows:

Variables

XiUS 
= Volume of exports of commodity i by the U.S. to Korea. Export value data in U.S. dollars for each industry come from source a. In the absence of export prices at the commodity level, we follow Bahmani-Oskooee and Hegerty (2009) and use the aggregate export price index of the U.S. to deflate the nominal exports of each commodity. The aggregate export price index comes from source b.
MiUS 
= Volume of imports of commodity i by the U.S. from Korea. Import value data in U.S. dollars for each industry come from source a. Again, we use the aggregate import price index of the U.S. to deflate the nominal imports of each commodity. The aggregate import price index comes from source b.
YUS 
= Measure of U.S. economic activity. Since data are monthly, we follow Bahmani-Oskooee and Ardalani (2006) and Bahmani-Oskooee and Aftab (2017) and use the Industrial Production Index, which is available monthly from source b.
YKOR 
= Measure of Korea’s economic activity, also proxied by the industrial production index from source b.
REX 
= Real bilateral exchange rate between US dollar and Korean won. It is defined as (NEX*CPIUS)/ CPIKOR where NEXi is the nominal exchange rate defined as the number of won per US dollar, CPIUS is the price level in the United States and CPIKOR is the price level in Korea. Thus, a decline in REX reflects a real depreciation of the USD. All data come from Source b.
PUUS 
= Measure of Economic Policy Uncertainty in the U.S., proxied by the economic policy uncertainty index from source c.
PUKOR 
= Measure of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Korea, also proxied by the economic policy uncertainty index from source c.

Notes

1
The policy uncertainty measure is now constructed for more than 20 countries by the Policy Uncertainty Group. For more details visit www.policyuncertainty.com (accessed on 4 March 2021).
2
A few examples are Bahmani-Oskooee (1986), Bahmani-Oskooee and Niroomand (1998), and Bahmani-Oskooee and Kara (2005). Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (2013) is the latest review article.
3
Note that estimates of θ0 and ρ 0 in this context are the same as an estimate of the coefficient attached to the lagged error-correction term in Engle and Granger’s (1987) approach. Hence, these estimates must be negative, and they measure the speed of adjustment. For proof, see Banerjee et al. (1998) and Bahmani-Oskooee and Ghodsi (2018).
4
For some other applications of this approach, see Halicioglu (2007), Durmaz (2015), Al-Shayeb and Hatemi-J. (2016), Aftab et al. (2017), Arize et al. (2017), and Hajilee and Niroomand (2019).
5
By meaningful we mean cointegration is supported either by the F or the t-test that is reported in the diagnostics in Table 4. Note that in industry 82, although the Korean policy uncertainty measure carries a significant coefficient, this industry is not included in the list since neither the F nor the t-test is significant.
6
As for the long-run effects of the income and exchange rate, while the exchange rate is significant in limited number of industries, Korean income or economic activity is significant in most industries.
7
Other diagnostics in Table 7 are similar to those in Table 4 and need no repeat. Furthermore, in most models the level of economic activity in the U.S. seems to be a significant long-run determinant of the U.S. imports from Korea.

References

  1. Aftab, Muhammad, Karim Bux Shah Syed, and Naveed Katper. 2017. Exchange-rate Volatility and Malaysian-Thai Bilateral Industry Trade Flows. Journal of Economic Studies 44: 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al-Shayeb, Abdulrahman, and Abdulnasser Hatemi-J. 2016. Trade Openness and Economic Development in the UAE: An Asymmetric Approach. Journal of Economic Studies 43: 587–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Al-Thaqeb, Saud Asaad, and Barrak Ghanim Algharabali. 2019. Economic Policy Uncertainty: A Literature Review. Journal of Economic Asymmetries 20: e00133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arize, Augustine C., John Malindretos, and Emmanuel U. Igwe. 2017. Do Exchange Rate Changes Improve the Trade Balance: An Asymmetric Nonlinear Cointegration Approach. International Review of Economics and Finance 49: 313–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Armelius, Hanna, Carl-Johan Belfrage, and Hanna Stenbacka. 2014. The Mystery of the Missing World Trade Growth after the Global Financial Crisis. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review 3: 7–22. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen. 1986. Determinants of International Trade Flows: Case of Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics 20: 107–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Farhang Niroomand. 1998. Long-Run Price Elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner Condition Revisited. Economics Letters 61: 101–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Orhan Kara. 2005. Income and Price Elasticities of Trade: Some New Estimates. International Trade Journal 19: 165–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Zohre Ardalani. 2006. Exchange Rate Sensitivity of U.S. Trade Flows: Evidence from Industry Data. Southern Economic Journal 72: 542–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Scott W. Hegerty. 2007. Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Flows: A Review Article. Journal of Economic Studies 34: 211–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Scott W. Hegerty. 2009. The Effects of Exchange-Rate Volatility on Commodity Trade between the U.S. and Mexico. Southern Economic Journal 75: 1019–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Muhammad Aftab. 2017. On the Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade Flows: New Evidence from US-Malaysia Trade at Industry Level. Economic Modelling 63: 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Seyed Hesam Ghodsi. 2017. Policy Uncertainty and House Prices in the United States of America. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 23: 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Seyed Hesam Ghodsi. 2018. Asymmetric Causality between the U.S. Housing Market and its Stock Market: Evidence from State-Level Data. Journal of Economic Asymmetries 18: e00095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, Hanafiah Harvey, and Scott W. Hegerty. 2013. Empirical Tests of the Marshall-Lerner Condition: A Literature Review. Journal of Economic Studies 40: 411–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, Ali Kutan, and Alice Kones. 2016. Policy Uncertainty and the Demand for Money in the United States. Applied Economics Quarterly 62: 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Mehrnoosh Hasanzade. 2021. Policy Uncertainty and Income Distribution: Asymmetric Evidence from State-Level Data in the U.S. Bulletin of Economic Research. forthcoming. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, Hanafiah Harvey, and Farhang Niroomand. 2018. On the Impact of Policy Uncertainty on Oil Prices: An Asymmetry Analysis. International Journal of Financial Studies 6: 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Baker, Scott R., Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. 2016. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131: 1593–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Banerjee, Anindya, Juan Dolado, and Ricardo Mestre. 1998. Error-Correction Mechanism Tests in a Single Equation Framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19: 267–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Brogaard, Jonathan, and Andrew Detzel. 2015. The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Management Science 61: 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Durmaz, Nazif. 2015. Industry Level J-curve in Turkey. Journal of Economic Studies 42: 689–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Engle, Robert F., and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica 55: 251–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hajilee, Massomeh, and Farhang Niroomand. 2019. On the Link between Financial Market Inclusion and Trade Openness: An Asymmetric Analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy 62: 373–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Halicioglu, Ferda. 2007. The J-Curve Dynamics of Turkish Bilateral Trade: A Cointegration Approach. Journal of Economic Studies 34: 103–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, Liyan, Mengchao Qi, and Libo Yin. 2016. Macroeconomic Policy Uncertainty Shocks on the Chinese Economy: A GVAR Analysis. Applied Economics 48: 4907–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Istiak, Khandokar, and Md Rafayet Alam. 2019. Oil Prices, Policy Uncertainty, and Asymmetries in Inflation Expectations. Journal of Economic Studies 46: 324–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kang, Wensheng, and Ronald A. Ratti. 2013. Oil Shocks, Policy Uncertainty, and Stock Market Return. International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money 26: 305–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ko, Jun-Hyung, and Chang-Min Lee. 2015. International Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Prices: Wavelet Approach. Economics Letters 134: 118–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pastor, Ľuboš, and Pietro Veronesi. 2013. Policy Uncertainty and Risk Premia. Journal of Financial Economics 110: 520–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pesaran, Hashem M., Yongcheol Shin, and Richard J. Smith. 2001. Bounds Testing Approach to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tam, Pui Sun. 2018. Global trade flows and economic policy uncertainty. Applied Economics 50: 3718–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Yizhong, Carl R. Chen, and Ying Sophie Huang. 2014. Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 26: 227–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monthly economic policy uncertainty indices.
Figure 1. Monthly economic policy uncertainty indices.
Jrfm 14 00520 g001
Table 1. Short-run coefficient estimates of Korean economic uncertainty on U.S. exports to Korea.
Table 1. Short-run coefficient estimates of Korean economic uncertainty on U.S. exports to Korea.
Code# Lags on ΔPUKOR
01234567
00 Live animals 0.063
01 Meat and preparations−0.142 **
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs −0.162 **−0.153 **−0.169 **
03 Fish, crustacean, and molluscs, and preparations thereof−0.222 *
04 Cereals and cereal preparations −0.005
05 Vegetables and fruit−0.170 **−0.055−0.0180.0260.0620.116 **0.129 **
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey−0.029
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof−0.015
08 Feeding stuff for animals (not including unmilled cereals)0.014
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations−0.067
11 Beverages0.059−0.188 **−0.099 *
21 Hides, skins and furskins, raw 0.054
22 Oil seeds and oleaginous fruit 0.343−0.602 **
23 Crude rubber (including synthetic and reclaimed)−0.0380.259 **
24 Cork and wood−0.034
25 Pulp and waste paper −0.031−0.060 *
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) 0.005
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals −0.053
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap 0.061
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes−0.022
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials0.015
41 Animal oils and fats −0.203
42 Fixed vegetable oils and fats −0.3880.3410.757 **0.909 **
43 Animal and vegetable oils and fats, processed and waxes 0.030
51 Organic chemicals0.075 *−0.007−0.066−0.153 **−0.076 *−0.102 **
52 Inorganic chemicals0.102
53 Dyeing, tanning, and coloring materials−0.033
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products−0.070
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations −0.038
56 Fertilizers, manufactured0.119
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products −0.005
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc −0.101 **
59 Chemical materials and products, nes−0.048−0.089 **−0.0120.066 *
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins −0.185 *
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #0.031
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures 0.009
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard −0.051 *
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products−0.036
66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures, nes 0.014
67 Iron and steel 0.069−0.113 *
68 Non-ferrous metals.−0.025
69 Manufactures of metals, nes−0.091 **0.085 **0.0430.069 **0.076 **0.058 *0.115 **0.067 **
71 Power generating machinery and equipment−0.087
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries −0.068
73 Metalworking machinery 0.009
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes−0.049
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment0.008
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment−0.055−0.168 **−0.265 **−0.0620.0150.1030.227 **0.157 **
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes 0.012
78 Road vehicles −0.010
79 Other transport equipment−0.0450.415 **
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes−0.041
82 Furniture and parts thereof0.0420.0480.0160.0930.195 **0.155 **0.132 **0.104 **
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers0.184 **
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories−0.037−0.108−0.125 *−0.275 **−0.191 **0.069−0.139 **
85 Footwear0.086
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes −0.064 *−0.101 **−0.096 **−0.048−0.0260.0070.064 **0.069 **
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc −0.0140.012−0.083 **
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes−0.068
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class −0.158 **
99 Estimate of non-Canadian low-value shipments0.009
Notes: ** and * indicate significance at 10% and 5% levels, respectively. The critical values of standard t-distribution, i.e., 1.64 and 1.96 are used to arrive at ** and *. The t-ratios themselves are not reported due to space constraints but they are available upon request. nes = not elsewhere specified. # next to an industry’s name indicates that the global financial crisis dummy was significant.
Table 2. Short-Run coefficient estimates of US economic policy uncertainty on U.S. exports to Korea.
Table 2. Short-Run coefficient estimates of US economic policy uncertainty on U.S. exports to Korea.
Code# Lags on ΔPUUS
01234567
00 Live animals 0.251
01 Meat and preparations0.078
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs 0.109 *
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof −0.250 *−0.1280.076−0.139−0.388 **
04 Cereals and cereal preparations −0.196 *0.202 *
05 Vegetables and fruit0.068
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey0.001
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof0.079
08 Feeding stuff for animals (not including unmilled cereals) 0.037
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations−0.008
11 Beverages−0.102
21 Hides, skins and furskins, raw −0.116 **
22 Oil seeds and oleaginous fruit −0.334
23 Crude rubber (including synthetic and reclaimed) −0.018−0.266 **0.1170.095−0.133
24 Cork and wood−0.028
25 Pulp and waste paper 0.068
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) −0.137 *−0.122−0.108−0.0160.062−0.0300.183 **
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals 0.015
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap −0.042−0.283 **−0.342 **−0.267 **−0.338 **−0.198 **−0.233 **
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes0.037−0.189 **−0.287 **−0.265 **−0.274 **−0.211 **−0.161 **
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials−0.252 *−0.331 **−0.318 **
41 Animal oils and fats 0.003−0.353 **−0.2150.101−0.391 **
42 Fixed vegetable oils and fats 0.198
43 Animal and vegetable oils and fats, processed and waxes −0.129
51 Organic chemicals−0.054
52 Inorganic chemicals−0.013
53 Dyeing, tanning, and coloring materials−0.014
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products0.019
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations −0.004
56 Fertilizers, manufactured0.085
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products −0.006
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc 0.089 **
59 Chemical materials and products, nes0.057
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins 0.092
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #−0.087
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures −0.200 **−0.094−0.176 **−0.083−0.0960.128−0.0040.163 **
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard 0.019
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products−0.015
66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures, nes −0.016
67 Iron and steel −0.131 *0.049−0.141 **
68 Non-ferrous metals.−0.087
69 Manufactures of metals, nes0.051
71 Power generating machinery and equipment0.131 *0.0790.1070.211 **
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 0.033
73 Metalworking machinery −0.1030.209 **
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes−0.023
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment−0.071
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment−0.0260.299 **0.287 **0.182 **0.228 **0.033
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes −0.033
78 Road vehicles −0.073−0.116 *
79 Other transport equipment0.040−0.474 **
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes−0.170
82 Furniture and parts thereof0.009
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers−0.107
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories−0.0300.0270.250 **0.233 **0.194 **0.0710.194 **
85 Footwear−0.115
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 0.0670.137 **0.189 **0.149 **
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc 0.017
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes−0.007
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class 0.039
99 Estimate of non-Canadian low-value shipments−0.003
Notes: ** and * indicate significance at 10% and 5% levels, respectively. The critical values of standard t-distribution, i.e., 1.64 and 1.96 are used to arrive at ** and *. The t-ratios themselves are not reported due to space constraints but they are available upon request. # next to an industry’s name indicates that the global financial crisis dummy was significant.
Table 3. Long-run coefficient estimates of U.S. export models.
Table 3. Long-run coefficient estimates of U.S. export models.
IndustriesSharecConstantLn YtKORLn REXtLn PUtKORLn PUtUS
00 Live animals #a0.045%10.571 (5.291) **1.363 (4.093) **−0.743 (0.807) b0.067 (0.339)0.267 (1.157)
01 Meat and preparations4.343%−0.430 (3.411) **2.197 (2.120) **1.408 (0.471)−0.232 (0.355)0.828 (1.173)
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs # 0.532%2.283 (4.651) **2.773 (6.204) **−1.132 (0.870)−0.169 (0.568)0.488 (1.716) *
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof #0.906%15.737 (6.081) **0.132 (0.478)0.033 (0.041)−0.238 (1.591)0.111 (0.488)
04 Cereals and cereal preparations #1.561%3.565 (6.644) **1.731 (3.060) **0.041 (0.026)−0.423 (1.065)−0.055 (0.127)
05 Vegetables and fruit #1.745%1.387 (4.347) **2.147 (7.541) **0.565 (0.720)−0.385 (1.787) *0.234 (1.336)
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey #0.076%3.629 (3.696) **0.892 (1.874) *−0.971 (0.715)−0.148 (0.521)0.007 (0.021)
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof #0.314%1.499 (5.324) **2.051 (11.650) **0.440 (0.894)−0.029 (0.266)0.153 (1.253)
08 Feeding stuff for animals (not including unmilled cereals) 1.282%0.629 (6.418) **2.396 (11.109) **0.657 (1.098)0.028 (0.219)0.075 (0.514)
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations #1.078%−1.059 (3.775) **1.962 (4.131) **2.389 (1.749) *−0.409 (1.431)−0.051 (0.167)
11 Beverages 0.190%5.212 (3.173) **−0.341 (0.255)−5.161 (1.314)1.065 (1.188)0.639 (0.840)
21 Hides, skins and furskins, raw 0.266%−1.486 (2.962) **−1.273 (0.952)−1.231 (0.328)−0.974 (0.929)2.096 (1.099)
22 Oil seeds and oleaginous fruit #0.792%21.274 (9.667) **−0.579 (1.872) *0.041 (0.047)0.251 (1.185)0.306 (1.327)
23 Crude rubber (including synthetic and reclaimed) 0.111%6.626 (5.215) **0.926 (2.217) **−0.893 (0.739)−0.308 (1.152)0.111 (0.302)
24 Cork and wood #0.142%5.761 (3.120) **−0.437 (0.875)−0.525 (0.380)−0.136 (0.455)−0.112 (0.320)
25 Pulp and waste paper 0.511%6.063 (5.901) **0.049 (0.244)−0.221 (0.404)−0.264 (1.944) *0.209 (1.561)
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) #0.385%5.865 (4.919) **0.240 (0.682)−0.076 (0.076)0.013 (0.074)0.109 (0.359)
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals #0.114%8.664 (7.621) **−0.122 (1.147)0.104 (0.351)−0.096 (1.531)0.027 (0.366)
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap #2.678%12.162 (6.174) **0.549 (1.265)−2.771 (2.244) **0.162 (0.781)0.487 (1.338)
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes #0.188%8.871 (9.292) **0.639 (3.431) **−0.668 (1.251)−0.233 (2.285) **0.649 (4.058) **
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials #17.503%1.632 (1.293)1.589 (0.376)−3.495 (0.280)0.272 (0.122)1.194 (0.356)
41 Animal oils and fats 0.086%3.226 (2.321) **0.097 (0.050)−1.168 (0.208)0.571 (0.542)−0.261 (0.157)
42 Fixed vegetable oils and fats 0.473%−6.639 (4.517) **1.695 (0.848)3.426 (0.611)0.202 (0.153)0.643 (0.533)
43 Animal and vegetable oils and fats, processed and waxes 0.012%5.726 (4.524) **0.394 (0.635)−0.338 (0.196)0.077 (0.207)−0.334 (0.766)
51 Organic chemicals4.545%7.253 (4.774) **−0.007 (0.021)−1.808 (1.983) **0.684 (2.796) **−0.217 (1.034)
52 Inorganic chemicals #1.145%17.387 (15.138) **0.838 (6.083) **−0.716 (1.826) *0.108 (1.356)−0.014 (0.147)
53 Dyeing, tanning, and coloring materials #0.549%1.536 (6.511) **1.281 (6.851) **1.022 (1.925) *−0.096 (0.884)−0.040 (0.312)
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products1.922%−2.337 (5.281) **2.658 (13.398) **1.615 (2.883) **−0.156 (1.336)0.042 (0.301)
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations #1.093%0.811 (4.018) **1.605 (8.668) **1.093 (2.078) **−0.148 (1.322)−0.015 (0.122)
56 Fertilizers, manufactured0.264%22.819 (4.497) **−1.450 (2.398) **−2.651 (1.499)0.207 (0.558)0.147 (0.359)
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products #1.927%9.900 (7.572) **0.972 (12.307) **−0.668 (3.057) **−0.008 (0.182)−0.012 (0.219)
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc #0.400%11.822 (8.409) **0.445 (5.721) **−0.260 (1.197)−0.141 (2.933) **0.125 (2.301) **
59 Chemical materials and products, nes2.475%7.103 (7.389) **1.302 (10.535) **−0.089 (0.258)−0.0004 (0.004)0.099 (1.263)
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins 0.007%2.924 (2.431) **−1.815 (0.594)−3.637 (0.406)−3.581 (1.093)1.782 (0.667)
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #0.263%0.077 (3.811) **2.093 (4.015) **1.052 (0.749)0.196 (0.647)−0.550 (1.315)
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures #0.046%7.012 (5.319) **−0.713 (1.548)−0.935 (0.712)0.032 (0.143)0.031 (0.078)
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard #0.497%4.988 (4.753) **0.557 (4.435) **0.281 (0.813)−0.129 (1.585)0.048 (0.566)
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products 0.269%0.816 (3.935) **0.633 (1.851) *1.461 (1.391)−0.207 (1.158)−0.084 (0.415)
66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures, nes #0.648%7.629 (7.263) **0.859 (7.421) **−0.467 (1.404)0.030 (0.461)0.099 (1.183)
67 Iron and steel #0.319%3.906 (4.303) **0.916 (1.238)−2.269 (1.036)1.315 (1.988) **−0.691 (1.254)
68 Non-ferrous metals #1.178%9.945 (4.706) **0.749 (2.343) **−2.034 (2.183) **−0.071 (0.409)0.119 (0.529)
69 Manufactures of metals, nes 1.000%2.110 (5.470) **1.575 (10.064) **0.863 (2.011) **−0.405 (3.310) **0.133 (1.346)
71 Power generating machinery and equipment1.811%10.889 (6.889) **0.589 (3.099) **−0.050 (0.092)−0.135 (1.402)−0.104 (0.685)
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 6.437%2.289 (5.321) **1.899 (5.172) **0.491 (0.495)−0.228 (1.102)0.113 (0.457)
73 Metalworking machinery 0.178%9.253 (4.454) **−1.604 (2.492) **−1.557 (0.826)0.038 (0.107)−0.935 (2.003) **
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes2.554%3.319 (4.233) **0.962 (4.198) **0.515 (0.799)−0.174 (1.278)−0.081 (0.501)
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment1.177%3.524 (3.676) **−0.679 (0.889)0.065 (0.039)0.052 (0.153)−0.446 (0.963)
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment1.042%4.654 (4.796) **−0.245 (0.584)0.983 (0.839)0.187 (0.663)−0.641 (1.820) *
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes #8.815%6.702 (4.565) **−0.693 (3.915) **−1.279 (2.566) **0.056 (0.565)0.013 (0.106)
78 Road vehicles #3.962%6.102 (6.399) **1.695 (4.812) **−1.435 (1.434)−0.033 (0.172)0.155 (0.586)
79 Other transport equipment4.564%4.593 (5.299) **0.932 (1.958) *1.335 (0.979)−0.622 (1.839) *−0.017 (0.045)
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes0.130%−1.593 (4.188) **1.076 (1.840) *2.704 (1.688) *−0.144 (0.437)−0.593 (1.364)
82 Furniture and parts thereof 0.130%−1.068 (3.575) **1.963 (2.301) **2.694 (1.133)−1.188 (1.762) *0.061 (0.143)
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers0.031%9.379 (3.416) **−1.758 (2.113) **−3.003 (1.435)0.822 (1.583)−0.479 (0.986)
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories0.186%5.342 (4.639) **1.349 (4.237) **−0.749 (0.833)0.334 (1.544)−0.378 (1.376)
85 Footwear0.067%5.134 (3.753) **−1.691 (0.353)−11.662 (0.931)1.795 (0.838)−2.416 (0.957)
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 4.707%5.523 (5.084) **0.985 (3.605) **−0.643 (0.581)0.329 (1.562)−0.574 (1.951) *
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc #0.802%8.179 (4.641) **−0.523 (1.342)−2.599 (2.416) **0.176 (0.802)0.075 (0.302)
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes2.359%8.434 (4.614) **0.544 (2.572) **−0.075 (0.131)−0.138 (1.039)−0.015 (0.103)
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class #0.557%−2.618 (5.249) **1.334 (3.921) **2.762 (2.746) **−0.435 (1.926) *0.199 (0.499)
99 Estimate of non-Canadian low-value shipments0.946%1.807 (3.740) **0.675 (2.467) **0.067 (0.091)0.067 (0.429)−0.019 (0.103)
Notes: a—# next to an industry’s name indicates that the global financial crisis dummy was significant. b—Numbers inside the parentheses are the absolute value of t-ratios. * and ** indicate significance at 5% levels and 10% levels respectively. c Share represents % share of each industry’s total U.S. exports to Korea.
Table 4. Diagnostic statistics associated with U.S. export models.
Table 4. Diagnostic statistics associated with U.S. export models.
IndustriesDiagnostics
F Stat a θ ^ 0 (t-Test) bLM cRESET dCUSUMCUSUMSQAdj. R2
00 Live animals 5.50 **−0.941 (5.292) **0.1290.785SS0.63
01 Meat and preparations2.34−0.094 (3.446)0.3490.073SUS0.08
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs 4.13 **−0.223 (4.586) **0.3093.200 *SS0.27
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof 7.20 **−0.933 (6.057) **5.774 **0.311SS0.71
04 Cereals and cereal preparations 8.69 **−0.288 (6.649) **0.0120.837SS0.20
05 Vegetables and fruit3.63*−0.290 (4.297) **4.98 **2.61USS0.59
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey2.67−0.196 (3.687) *0.4660.144SS0.36
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof5.42 **−0.519 (5.254) **9.979 **1.771SS0.35
08 Feeding stuff for animals (not including unmilled cereals) 8.43 **−0.495 (6.549) **0.0861.448SUS0.39
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations2.90−0.163 (3.841) *0.31410.159 **SS0.35
11 Beverages1.94−0.115 (3.146)0.1792.721 *SS0.36
21 Hides, skins and furskins, raw 1.660.055 (2.908)0.05912.690 **SS0.35
22 Oil seeds and oleaginous fruit 18.38 **−1.312 (9.673) **0.0207.955 **SS0.43
23 Crude rubber (including synthetic and reclaimed) 5.35 **−0.358 (5.216) **0.0922.439SS0.45
24 Cork and wood1.93−0.252 (3.134)0.2930.029SS0.54
25 Pulp and waste paper 6.90 **−0.324 (5.928) **0.5280.012SS0.45
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) 4.77 **−0.379 (4.929) **0.7030.275SS0.30
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals 11.44 **−0.553 (7.631) **1.6198.018 **SS0.33
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap 7.47 **−0.377 (6.168) **1.0571.505SS0.31
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes16.86 **−0.574 (9.298) **0.0171.245SS0.46
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials0.32−0.056 (1.269)0.0115.476 **SS0.26
41 Animal oils and fats 1.06−0.158 (2.320)0.2240.301SS0.32
42 Fixed vegetable oils and fats 4.00*−0.307 (4.512) **0.8160.072SS0.44
43 Animal and vegetable oils and fats, processed and waxes 4.01 **−0.388 (4.516) **0.4394.465 **SS0.39
51 Organic chemicals4.49 **−0.247 (4.779) **0.8640.029SS0.39
52 Inorganic chemicals45.09 **−0.945 (15.141) **4.470 **0.422SUS0.48
53 Dyeing, tanning, and coloring materials8.29 **−0.347 (6.491) **0.1942.916 *SS0.25
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products5.59 **−0.449 (5.332) **1.9320.142SS0.48
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations 3.11−0.255 (−3.981) *0.4240.441SS0.45
56 Fertilizers, manufactured3.98*−0.577 (4.499) **0.29210.609 **SS0.53
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products 11.28 **−0.537 (7.577) **1.6580.073SS0.41
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc 13.90 **−0.714 (8.413) **0.3892.359SS0.39
59 Chemical materials and products, nes10.69 **−0.576 (7.376) **1.7594.636 **SS0.46
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins 1.19−0.052 (2.457)1.0300.008SUS0.25
62 Rubber manufactures, nes3.81*−0.158 (4.401) **4.721 **9.169 **SS0.23
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures 5.56 **−0.289 (5.322) **1.3751.095SS0.28
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard 4.43 **−0.392 (4.747) **4.193 **1.557SS0.34
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products3.12−0.175 (3.986) *0.4880.257SS0.31
66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures, nes 10.37 **−0.483 (7.263) **0.0910.486SS0.35
67 Iron and steel 3.65*−0.155 (4.313) **0.0340.011SS0.41
68 Non-ferrous metals.4.34 **−0.349 (4.699) **6.302 **0.002SS0.43
69 Manufactures of metals, nes5.92 **−0.386 (5.489) **0.0001.777SS0.41
71 Power generating machinery and equipment9.32 **−0.641 (6.887) **2.796 *0.322SS0.45
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 5.61 **−0.296 (5.341) **1.0392.238SS0.27
73 Metalworking machinery 3.91 *−0.237 (4.460) **0.0554.731 **SS0.26
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes3.53 *−0.281 (4.235) **0.1451.237SS0.36
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment2.69−0.159 (3.701) *0.8811.255SS0.48
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment4.56 **−0.327 (4.824) **0.0165.949 **SS0.37
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes 4.10 **−0.212 (4.568) **0.3860.006SS0.28
78 Road vehicles 8.00 **−0.302 (6.383) **0.0190.027SS0.20
79 Other transport equipment5.57 **−0.534 (5.326) **1.0590.903SS0.52
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes3.50−0.287 (4.223) **0.0292.593SS0.37
82 Furniture and parts thereof2.48−0.149 (3.557)0.5330.014SS0.44
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers2.30−0.223 (3.423)1.0880.005SS0.47
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories4.21 **−0.355 (4.637) **1.4883.126 *SS0.47
85 Footwear2.77−0.048 (3.752) *5.070 **1.928SS0.35
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 5.06 **−0.274 (5.079) **1.2200.309SS0.58
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc 4.23 **−0.223 (4.638) **7.025 **0.169SS0.24
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes4.20 **−0.492 (4.621) **0.2872.850 *SS0.47
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class 5.35 **−0.363 (5.217) **1.0120.053SS0.40
99 Estimate of non-Canadian low-value shipments2.76−0.134 (3.746) *1.8470.015SS0.27
Notes: a—At the 5% (10%) significance level when there are four exogenous variables (k = 4), the upper bound critical value of the F test is 4.01 (3.52). These come from Pesaran et al. (2001, Table CI-Case III, page 300). b—Number inside the parenthesis next to θ ^ 0 is the absolute value of the t-ratio for cointegration. The upper bound critical value at the 5% (10%) significance level is −3.99 (−3.66) when k = 4 and these come from Pesaran et al. (2001, Table CII-Case III, page 303). c—LM is the Lagrange multiplier test of residual serial correlation. It is distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom (first-order). Its critical value at 5% (10%) significance level is 3.84 (2.77). d—RESET is Ramsey’s test for misspecification. It is distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom. **, and * show a level of significance at 5% and 10%, respectively.
Table 5. Short-run coefficient estimates of Korea economic policy uncertainty on U.S. imports from Korea.
Table 5. Short-run coefficient estimates of Korea economic policy uncertainty on U.S. imports from Korea.
Code# Lags on ΔPUKOR
01234567
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs 0.005−0.365 **−0.229 **−0.225 **−0.166 *
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof 0.049−0.146 **−0.147 **
04 Cereals and cereal preparations −0.033
05 Vegetables and fruit0.0840.156 **
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey−0.088
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof0.049
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations−0.019
11 Beverages0.010−0.077 *−0.136 **−0.092 **−0.156 **−0.069 *
12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures−0.049
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) 0.059
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals −0.005−0.23−0.092−0.059−0.0810.152 **
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap 0.090
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes−0.026
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials0.008−0.319 **−0.316 **−0.091−0.308 **
34 Gas, natural and manufactured−0.349 **
51 Organic chemicals−0.190 **
52 Inorganic chemicals−0.113−0.086−0.205 **
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products0.0990.0100.033−0.019−0.454 **
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations −0.004
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products −0.125 **−0.090 **
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc −0.031
59 Chemical materials and products, nes−0.015−0.143 **−0.110 **−0.085 **−0.115 **−0.112 **
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins −0.028
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #0.027
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures −0.082
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard −0.044 *
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products−0.032 *−0.051 **−0.044 **−0.047 **−0.037 **−0.039 **
67 Iron and steel −0.171 **
68 Non-ferrous metals0.027
69 Manufactures of metals, nes0.006
71 Power generating machinery and equipment−0.152 **−0.0570.0180.018−0.135 **
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 0.058−0.155 **−0.211 **−0.087 **−0.059−0.118 **
73 Metalworking machinery −0.065−0.138 **
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes−0.038−0.115 **−0.047−0.065 **
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment−0.027
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment−0.049
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes −0.033
78 Road vehicles 0.148 **−0.0210.030−0.075 **−0.141 **
79 Other transport equipment−0.122−0.165−0.263 **
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes0.130 *
82 Furniture and parts thereof−0.008
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers−0.065
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories−0.0160.0390.076 *0.021−0.042−0.101 **−0.064 **
85 Footwear0.014
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 0.009−0.060−0.0420.104 **0.039−0.0290.048
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc 0.0320.095 **0.0270.094 **0.086 **0.0350.088 **0.139 **
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes−0.022−0.061 **−0.014−0.034−0.048 **−0.0290.045 **
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class 0.005
98 Estimate of import items valued under $251 and others 0.009
Notes: ** and * indicate significance at 10% and 5% levels, respectively. The critical values of standard t-distribution, i.e., 1.64 and 1.96 are used to arrive at ** and *. The t-ratios themselves are not reported due to space constraints but they are available upon request.
Table 6. Short-run coefficient estimates of U.S. economic policy uncertainty on U.S. imports from Korea.
Table 6. Short-run coefficient estimates of U.S. economic policy uncertainty on U.S. imports from Korea.
Code# Lags on ΔPUUS
01234567
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs 0.112
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof 0.012
04 Cereals and cereal preparations 0.006
05 Vegetables and fruit0.196 **−0.279 **
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey−0.091
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof0.113
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations0.066 *
11 Beverages0.047
12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures0.036
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) −0.068
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals 0.089
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap −0.1010.580 **
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes0.016−0.226 **
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials0.2780.2540.2380.1650.715 **
34 Gas, natural and manufactured0.181
51 Organic chemicals0.214 **
52 Inorganic chemicals0.0930.1550.334 **0.250 **0.057−0.1450.148 *
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products−0.089
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations 0.034
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products 0.129 **0.073 *
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc 0.009
59 Chemical materials and products, nes0.0860.0970.128 **
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins −0.103
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #−0.020
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures 0.094
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard 0.035
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products0.012
67 Iron and steel 0.236 **
68 Non-ferrous metals−0.009
69 Manufactures of metals, nes0.029
71 Power generating machinery and equipment0.132 **
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries −0.040
73 Metalworking machinery 0.117
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes0.036
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment0.001−0.087 **
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment−0.036
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes 0.029
78 Road vehicles −0.141 **
79 Other transport equipment0.113
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes0.144 *
82 Furniture and parts thereof0.023
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers0.148 **
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories0.0560.045−0.052−0.0560.068
85 Footwear−0.062
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 0.082 *−0.0140.089 *−0.122 **
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc 0.019
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes0.035
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class −0.112
98 Estimate of import items valued under $251 and others −0.012
Notes: ** and * indicate significance at 10% and 5% levels, respectively. The critical values of standard t-distribution, i.e., 1.64 and 1.96 are used to arrive at ** and *. The t-ratios themselves are not reported due to space constraints but they are available upon request.
Table 7. Long-run coefficient estimates of U.S. import models.
Table 7. Long-run coefficient estimates of U.S. import models.
IndustriesSharecConstantLn YtUSLn REXtLn PUtKORLn PUtUS
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs #a 0.013%4.959 (4.628) **3.828 (2.095) **−3.048 (2.236) **0.325 (1.012) b0.305 (1.015)
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof #0.207%2.381 (2.672) **1.673 (0.987)−0.509 (0.399)0.293 (1.115)0.050 (0.199)
04 Cereals and cereal preparations #0.162%0.476 (1.506)0.614 (0.004)−17.538 (0.056)−14.159 (0.057)2.529 (0.063)
05 Vegetables and fruit#0.264%−7.136 (5.353) **7.973 (5.626) **−0.241 (0.239)−0.156 (0.625)1.105 (3.706) **
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey #0.006%−4.945 (6.838) **1.690 (1.655) *2.135 (2.948) **−0.155 (1.058)−0.160 (0.959)
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof #0.023%0.376 (2.873) **4.197 (1.573)−1.582 (0.845)0.216 (0.602)0.499 (1.211)
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations#0.276%−2.239 (2.444) **3.579 (0.605)−8.899 (0.874)0.470 (0.509)0.766 (0.634)
11 Beverages 0.147%1.498 (2.245) **2.804 (0.807)−2.679 (1.086)0.338 (0.607)0.538 (1.018)
12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures #0.108%−8.897 (4.623) **8.999 (3.972) **2.459 (1.528)−0.243 (0.759)0.177 (0.507)
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) #0.256%9.135 (9.445) **1.239 (2.504) **−0.829 (2.381) **0.107 (1.526)−0.122 (1.517)
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals #0.025%−6.919 (4.872) **5.109 (3.492) **1.237 (1.248)−0.021 (0.084)0.259 (1.090)
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap #0.021%26.479 (14.544) **0.468 (0.238)−2.019 (1.448)0.099 (0.388)−0.744 (2.329) **
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes#0.052%6.505 (5.944) **2.247 (2.431) **−1.602 (2.489) **0.205 (1.377)0.137 (0.781)
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials #4.354%2.345 (4.022) **7.067 (2.278) **−3.384 (1.512)1.171 (1.604)−1.149 (1.119)
34 Gas, natural and manufactured0.021%−1.798 (2.153) **5.596 (0.876)−1.144 (0.254)0.127 (0.126)1.028 (0.980)
51 Organic chemicals1.732%13.939 (6.032) **1.719 (0.899)−4.796 (3.524) **−0.040 (0.158)0.629 (2.27) **
52 Inorganic chemicals #0.159%−2.841 (2.951) **6.424 (1.713) *0.587 (0.224)0.272 (0.448)−0.271 (0.304)
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products2.833%−16.874 (3.150) **31.559 (3.389) **3.271 (0.542)0.822 (0.570)−0.816 (0.562)
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations #0.828%3.521 (2.639) **16.423 (2.108) **5.391 (0.922)2.408 (1.337)−1.029 (0.647)
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products #1.522%2.063 (1.687) *85.955 (0.117)17.065 (0.096)2.092 (0.102)−0.828 (0.053)
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc #1.087%−4.139 (2.914) **−8.386 (0.529)−9.540 (0.732)0.909 (0.701)−0.255 (0.294)
59 Chemical materials and products, nes0.720%2.529 (2.720) **3.406 (1.412)−2.981 (1.479)−0.093 (0.214)0.862 (1.646)
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins 0.006%11.891 (3.479) **−5.549 (3.245) **0.611 (0.501)−0.088 (0.360)−0.318 (1.067)
62 Rubber manufactures, nes #2.146%2.073 (3.176) **−10.243 (0.614)−0.453 (0.090)0.903 (0.719)−0.662 (0.426)
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures #0.006%−6.161 (3.089) **3.972 (1.124)3.701 (1.468)−0.429 (0.875)0.489 (0.769)
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard #0.849%1.342 (4.451) **1.821 (2.084) **0.371 (0.615)0.073 (0.529)−0.101(0.524)
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products 1.231%0.734 (2.810) **−0.277 (0.161)1.595 (1.318)−0.358 (1.242)0.149 (0.517)
67 Iron and steel #3.506%7.709 (3.961) **0.319 (0.114)−4.981 (2.540) **0.193 (0.474)0.514 (1.106)
68 Non-ferrous metals #1.095%7.664 (3.845) **4.228 (1.248)−7.151 (2.812) **0.151 (0.358)0.839 (1.564)
69 Manufactures of metals, nes 2.430%−0.625 (3.623) **3.864 (7.068) **0.286 (0.741)0.021 (0.274)0.099 (1.096)
71 Power generating machinery and equipment3.256%−1.337 (3.786) **5.493 (2.312) **0.025 (0.016)−0.555 (1.439)0.866 (2.372) **
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 3.804%10.219 (5.099) **−4.756 (1.177)−10.609 (3.657) **1.994 (2.96) **−0.419 (0.799)
73 Metalworking machinery 0.832%11.321 (5.779) **2.163 (1.151)−5.239 (3.718) **0.175 (0.674)0.424 (1.628) *
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes5.144%0.339 (2.322) **4.419 (2.059) **−1.059 (0.703)0.265 (0.812)0.325 (1.029)
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment6.193%−1.250 (3.599) **1.311 (0.546)3.769 (2.245) **−0.268 (0.801)0.228 (0.513)
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment5.641%10.912 (5.509) **−3.595 (3.151) **−0.103 (0.130)−0.178 (1.071)−0.128 (0.691)
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes #11.154%1.103 (5.232) **1.807 (2.937) **0.987 (2.263) **−0.143 (1.571)0.130 (1.239)
78 Road vehicles #27.347%−0.411 (4.904) **4.388 (4.925) **0.248 (0.395)0.359 (2.173) **−0.283 (1.557)
79 Other transport equipment1.093%6.521 (3.919) **2.965 (1.133)−2.528 (1.399)0.364 (0.864)0.313 (0.764)
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes0.183%−11.502 (3.688) **11.859 (4.000) **3.493 (1.744) *−0.596 (1.264)0.821 (1.578)
82 Furniture and parts thereof 0.329%1.424 (1.331)0.001 (0.001)−2.336 (0.583)−0.173 (0.239)0.513 (0.616)
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers0.106%−5.251 (3.508) **10.232 (2.100) **2.907 (0.742)−0.714 (1.001)1.616 (1.518)
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories0.320%−2.256 (2.329) **4.049 (0.334)14.958 (1.547)−1.954 (0.882)0.789 (0.268)
85 Footwear0.074%−5.997 (4.117) **9.519 (1.614) *5.621 (1.581)1.390 (1.182)−0.744 (0.856)
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes 1.022%3.837 (4.242) **2.336 (1.139)−4.459 (2.810) **−0.462 (1.001)1.252 (2.572) **
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods; watches, etc #0.215%0.866 (3.806) **1.261 (1.194)1.164 (1.573)−0.340 (1.827) *0.079 (0.478)
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes4.262%−3.116 (3.697) **10.327 (2.502) **1.889 (1.091)0.316 (0.654)0.529 (1.118)
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class #1.476%−13.649 (9.581) **4.394 (7.344) **1.869 (4.444) **0.005 (0.079)−0.124 (1.544)
98 Estimate of import items valued under $251 and others #0.454%3.025 (4.319) **0.906 (1.133)−0.210 (0.393)0.041 (0.390)−0.058 (0.465)
Notes: a—# next to an industry’s name indicates that the global financial crisis dummy was significant. b—Numbers inside the parentheses are the absolute value of t-ratios. * and ** indicate significance at 5% levels and 10% levels respectively. c—Share represents % share of each industry’s total U.S. imports from Korea.
Table 8. Diagnostic statistics associated with U.S. import models.
Table 8. Diagnostic statistics associated with U.S. import models.
IndustriesDiagnostics
F Stat a ρ ^ 0 (t-Test) bLM cRESET dCUSUMCUSUMSQAdj. R2
02 Dairy products and birds’ eggs 4.13 **−0.367 (4.585) **2.5700.015USS0.42
03 Fish, crustacean and molluscs, and preparations thereof 1.39−0.234 (2.662)1.3400.012SS0.43
04 Cereals and cereal preparations 0.39−0.002 (1.409)3.092 *1.188SS0.39
05 Vegetables and fruit5.66 **−0.293 (5.370) **22.259 **1.188USS0.45
06 Sugar, sugar preparations, and honey9.19 **−0.570 (6.839) **1.9740.221SS0.44
07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and manufactures thereof1.57−0.226 (2.827)0.5240.143SS0.42
09 Miscellaneous edible products and preparations1.220.041 (2.493)4.530 **0.325SS0.40
11 Beverages0.95−0.087 (2.195)0.3621.315SS0.32
12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures4.25 **−0.204 (4.649) **0.0130.136SS0.41
26 Textile fibers (not wool tops) and their wastes (not in yarn) 17.51 **−0.553 (9.441) **0.3320.936SS0.37
27 Crude fertilizer and crude minerals 4.67 **−0.346 (4.873) **0.3130.009SS0.42
28 Metalliferous ores and metal scrap 41.66 **−0.917 (14.558) **0.0030.123SUS0.46
29 Crude animal and vegetable materials, nes6.89 **−0.469 (5.922) **2.1390.926SS0.46
33 Petroleum, petroleum products, and related materials3.06−0.249 (3.950) *0.6354.598 **SS0.46
34 Gas, natural and manufactured0.94−0.176 (2.184)0.4662.605SUS0.38
51 Organic chemicals7.13 **−0.340 (6.024) **0.0482.158SS0.27
52 Inorganic chemicals1.72−0.154 (2.963)1.8762.436SS0.38
54 Medicinal and pharmaceutical products1.96−0.109 (3.156)0.0590.387SUS0.29
55 Oils and perfume materials; toilet and cleansing preparations 1.320.033 (2.599)1.1030.786USS0.41
57 Explosives and pyrotechnic products 0.550.004 (1.672)1.8880.096SS0.33
58 Artificial resins and plastic materials, and cellulose esters, etc 1.680.034 (2.927)8.993 **0.859SS0.37
59 Chemical materials and products, nes1.41−0.136 (2.684)0.03014.499 **SS0.33
61 Leather, leather manufactures, nes, and dressed furskins 2.39−0.324 (3.489)0.6425.063 **SS0.47
62 Rubber manufactures, nes.1.94−0.030 (3.150)1.3402.107SS0.38
63 Cork and wood, cork manufactures 1.88−0.192 (3.091)0.0882.057SS0.37
64 Paper, paperboard, and articles of pulp, of paper, or of paperboard 3.90 *−0.209 (4.454) **0.3560.089SS0.38
65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes, and related products1.53−0.079 (2.792)2.831 *0.279SS0.46
67 Iron and steel 3.08−0.157 (3.962) *0.3970.200SS0.41
68 Non-ferrous metals2.89−0.177 (3.834) *0.0560.005SS0.37
69 Manufactures of metals, nes2.62−0.293 (3.651)0.0031.667SS0.49
71 Power generating machinery and equipment2.90−0.153 (3.841) *0.0292.541SS0.44
72 Machinery specialized for particular industries 5.07 **−0.094 (5.083) **0.0009.702 **SS0.39
73 Metalworking machinery 6.54 **−0.275 (5.771) **1.2460.895SS0.31
74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes, and parts of, nes1.02−0.111 (2.279)0.6450.026USS0.27
75 Office machines and automatic data processing equipment3.00−0.102 (3.904) *1.0270.007SS0.19
76 Telecommunications, sound recording, and reproducing equipment5.97 **−0.278 (5.512) **0.6890.128SS0.30
77 Electric machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes, and parts, nes5.40 **−0.229 (5.245) **0.1293.551 *SS0.31
78 Road vehicles5.24 **−0.242 (5.165) **0.2560.222SS0.35
79 Other transport equipment3.01−0.360 (3.916) *2.5260.808USS0.45
81 Sanitary, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, and fittings, nes2.68−0.176 (3.696) *3.024 *1.387SS0.31
82 Furniture and parts thereof0.34−0.045 (1.319)0.0240.007USS0.40
83 Travel goods, handbags, and similar containers2.41−0.092 (3.503)5.433 **0.209SS0.26
84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories1.04−0.022 (2.305)7.209 **3.453 *SS0.44
85 Footwear3.31−0.083 (4.104) **1.3630.337SS0.39
87 Professional, scientific, controlling instruments, apparatus, nes3.52 *−0.112 (4.237) **2.3360.448SS0.48
88 Photographic equipment and supplies, optical goods, watches, etc2.91−0.246 (3.853) *0.0062.376SS0.44
89 Miscellaneous manufactured articles, nes2.71−0.067 (3.716) *1.01215.944 **SS0.28
93 Special transactions, commodity not classified according to class18.06 **−0.903 (9.589) **0.0140.647SS0.54
98 Estimate of import items valued under $251 and others 3.66 *−0.212 (4.313) **0.0040.004SS0.27
Notes: a—At the 5% (10%) significance level when there are four exogenous variables (k = 4), the upper bound critical value of the F test is 4.01 (3.52). These come from Pesaran et al. (2001, Table CI-Case III, page 300). b—Number inside the parenthesis next to ρ ^ 0 is the absolute value of the t-ratio for cointegration. The upper bound critical value at the 5% (10%) significance level is −3.99 (−3.66) when k = 4 and these come from Pesaran et al. (2001, Table CII-Case III, page 303). c—LM is the Lagrange multiplier test of residual serial correlation. It is distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom (first-order). Its critical value at 5% (10%) significance level is 3.84 (2.77). d—RESET is Ramsey’s test for misspecification. It is distributed as χ2 with one degree of freedom. **, and * show a level of significance at 5% and 10%, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bahmani-Oskooee, M.; Baek, J. Whose Policy Uncertainty Matters in the Trade between Korea and the U.S.? J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14, 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110520

AMA Style

Bahmani-Oskooee M, Baek J. Whose Policy Uncertainty Matters in the Trade between Korea and the U.S.? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021; 14(11):520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Jungho Baek. 2021. "Whose Policy Uncertainty Matters in the Trade between Korea and the U.S.?" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14, no. 11: 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110520

APA Style

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Baek, J. (2021). Whose Policy Uncertainty Matters in the Trade between Korea and the U.S.? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(11), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110520

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop