Next Article in Journal
Risk Implications for the Role of Budgets in Implementing Post-Acquisition Systems Integration Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Equity Premium with Habits, Wealth Inequality and Background Risk
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Neural Network Monte Carlo Approximation for Expected Utility Theory

J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14(7), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070322
by Yichen Zhu † and Marcos Escobar-Anel *,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14(7), 322; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070322
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 18 June 2021 / Published: 13 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics and Finance)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper studies a continuous portfolio optimization problem with stochastic volatility; Monte Carlo simulations are performed, with help of neural networks. I think the paper can be accepted after a few minor revisions.

  • Particular focus is made on the 4/2 SV model, but I wonder if the methodology would be easily transferable to models with other elasticity constant, for instance a 3/2 model (see e.g. Carr and Sun, Rev. Deriv. Res. 2007).
  • As Monte Carlo methods are involved, it would be interesting to have a bit more practical details such as convergence speed or confidence intervals. 
  • Also, as a non specialist of deep learning techniques, I wonder whether neural networks provide better variance reduction than classical techniques (such as antithetic variates), or simply a faster convergence? Maybe a short discussion on the topic would be welcome.
  • P.15 please correct "Levy" to "Lévy".

Author Response

Please see the file attached.

Thank you.

Reviewer 2 Report

Please, see the file attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the file attached.

Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

After reading the new version of the manuscript, I notedd a great improvement of the work. The authors have enriched both the theoretical part and the numerical exercise according to all the suggestions I proposed.

Hence, I believe that the paper is now ready for publication. 

Back to TopTop