Next Article in Journal
Sustainability Initiatives for Green Tourism Development: The Case of Wayanad, India
Next Article in Special Issue
The COVID-19 Health Crisis and Its Impact on China’s International Relations
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of an Integrated External Environment Monitoring Framework Aimed at the Internal Control of the Procurement Process of Fat and Oil Companies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Financial Burden and Shortage of Respiratory Rehabilitation for SARS-CoV-2 Survivors: The Next Step of the Pandemic?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

COVID-19: Barriers to Physical Activity in Older Adults, a Decline in Health or Economy?

1
Dr. Stephen Hui Research Centre for Physical Recreation and Wellness, Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
2
Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
3
Centre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
4
Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LaPSCo, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(2), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020051
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2022 / Published: 23 January 2022
Since spring 2020, in response to the global threat of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several governments implemented emergency policies and regulations to prevent further transmission of the disease (Portegijs et al. 2021). Social distancing, isolation or lock-downs have been adopted to control the transmission and protect citizens. These regulations involve typically restricting the mobility of citizens and the closure of activity destinations. Although the measures could “flatten the curve” of new cases and minimize the infection rates, the restrictions have also had significant impacts on citizens’ health and well-being due to the amplification of the barriers to physical activity (PA). The impacts may be more obvious and impactful to vulnerable populations, namely, the elderly and those with chronic medical conditions and individuals with sedentary behaviors (Marashi et al. 2021). Evidence has shown that the decline in PA could represent an increased risk of developing functional limitations and daily living disabilities (Tak et al. 2013), chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (Hupin et al. 2015), obesity (Zbrońska and Mędrela-Kuder 2018), cognitive decline (Shah et al. 2017), dementia (Guure et al. 2017), depression (Schuch et al. 2018) and the rate of all-cause mortality (Hupin et al. 2015). In contrast, there are numerous benefits for improving PA, which have been thoroughly reported in previous studies. The level of and engagement in PA are also associated with the economy of a country, especially from the aspects of healthcare and medication. According to a previous report from Australia, almost 7% of Australia’s health burden was attributed to physical inactivity, with the main contributors being ischemic heart disease (51%), type 2 diabetes (20%) and stroke (14%) (Begg et al. 2007). The diseases usually occur in elderly adults. This indicates that elderly populations would be badly affected by COVID-19 but would also gain the most benefit from increased levels of PA. The increased PA levels would result in a decreased occurrence of the disease and facilitate a decline in future economic demands of healthcare and medication.
According to previous studies prior to COVID-19, there were some existing physical barriers for PA participation for the elderly including physical limitations such as discomfort and different kinds of pain. In addition, psychosocial barriers such as lack of motivation and lack of enjoyment also exist, in conjunction with other numerous barriers such as environmental factors and social support, etc. (Portegijs et al. 2020). During the COVID-19 epidemic, the existing barriers have been widely amplified. Many governments have implemented measures such as lockdowns to control the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These measures have resulted in public sports and recreational facilities being forced to close. Now, as communities are returning to normal activities and more people are in the public domain more often, physical distancing is used as a common approach globally to ensure physical space between people in public areas. The rationale behind social distancing is to minimize the virus spread by avoiding crowds, group gatherings, and refraining from individual contact with one another (Nilsen et al. 2020). However, these policies have brought about an increase in sedentary behavior and relational distancing, which has resulted in a general norm for the increased physical inactivity of citizens. The impact is more apparent among vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with chronic medical conditions. The situation of city-wide lockdowns or restrictive access to public sports facilities has forced individuals to change hobbies and habits, and the elderly have been reported to associate with decreased activity during the COVID-19 pandemic (Suzuki et al. 2020). In addition, Yuta Suzuki’s research team (Suzuki et al. 2020) found that elderly people in a relevantly more dormant state faced another physical obstacle that related to the changes in daily transportation needs.
Considering its impact on health, the environmental limitations restricted PA levels, leading to the deterioration of function or cognitive decline, which would adversely affect PA levels. As reported by Yamada’s research team (Yamada et al. 2020), the total PA time decreased by 65 min per week across frailty and robust groups of older adults in Japan during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The decreasing rates recorded were 30% and 36.4% in frail and robust older adults, respectively. The PA decrease may indicate a deteriorating trend of physical function and disability in the future (Yamada et al. 2020). Not only physically, the COVID-19 pandemic has also induced dramatic changes in psychosocial status. The elderly and people with severe comorbidities are particularly vulnerable to the adverse consequences of COVID-19. This issue may cause considerable fear among the elderly and exaggerate other related psychological problems including increases in anxiety, irritability and excessive stress (Dubey et al. 2020). These psychological impacts on the elderly may automatically transform into a sense of self-protection awareness by confining themselves to home because they have increased concerns about being infected when contacting others. The contact may occur with close relations and friends during gatherings indoors or with strangers in crowded places in public areas. Hence, psychological stresses such as fear and anxiety are potentially perceived barriers to outdoor activities. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a situation where a paradoxical loop has developed. This paradox relates to the fact that elderly populations are unable to conduct physical activities due to the psychological stresses or closure of faculties, simultaneously; they are unable to relieve their psychological stresses through physical activities. A summary of the barriers to physical activity of older adults amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and the relevant effects to elderly’s health and economy has been summarized in Figure 1.
In relation to the economy, healthcare and hospitalization costs may increase with increases in the age of populations and their aggravation of diseases. When the elderly become less active, they have more risk of sarcopenia, depression, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease and are a majority group who are subjected to multi-morbidity with implications for proper medical care and social service support. According to a study published in 2016 examining data from the United States in 2014, non-institutionalized adults aged 50 years old and greater cost a staggering USD 860 billion annually in healthcare. This figure is amazing when we consider that four out of five of the most costly chronic conditions among the elderly can be prevented or managed by PA (Watson et al. 2016). Similarly, research conducted in the pre-pandemic period in Australia illustrated that, if the prevalence of physical inactivity in adults experienced a reduction of 10%, this would result in 6000 fewer incident cases of the disease, 2000 fewer deaths and 25,000 fewer disability-adjusted life years, which may confer a reduction of AUD 96 million in health sector costs (Cadilhac et al. 2011). Two recent studies during the COVID-19 pandemic have illustrated similar concepts that billions of dollars in global health-related expenditure could be saved by improving the level of PA (Hafner et al. 2019; Hafner et al. 2020), since regular PA is associated with lower onset rates of different chronic diseases, such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes and dementia, etc. (Baker et al. 2021; Guure et al. 2017), when people progress in age. Although it is unrealistic to expect immediately converting health costs to savings when people become sufficiently active (Stephenson et al. 2000), the cost of pharmaceuticals might be reduced in the short term. For example, blood pressure could be reduced by 3–5 mmHg if individuals began to conduct regular moderate PA; using this scenario, the cost for antihypertensive medication would be reduced. From a long-term perspective, a large amount of savings from the reduction in cost of health care, hospitalization and medication because of physical inactivity could be used for individual services followed by economically supporting the government and healthcare providers, which would further benefit the entire society. Taking an example of Hong Kong, whose population is ageing, the total health spending from 1989/90 to 2019/20 grew at an average annual rate of 5.6% in real terms, faster than the corresponding 3.4% increase in the gross domestic product (GDP) during the same period. As a result, total health expenditure as a percentage of the GDP increased from 3.6% in 1989/90 to 6.8% in 2019/20 (Food and Health Bureau 2021) and is expected to continuously increase in the coming years. Even after the resumption of the world economy when the COVID-19 pandemic ends, the economic impacts of physical inactivity due to the barriers amplified by COVID-19 would remain. If this sedentary lifestyle in the elderly continues, the number of health-related expenditures could increase even more, which would consequently result in a heavier burden to the government in the future, as 53% of the current health expenditure was paid via government schemes, and only 30% was by household out-of-pocket payment in 2019/20 (Food and Health Bureau 2021).
Therefore, in order to maintain health and safeguard the economy, a further initiative to overcome barriers to physical activity includes tools such as online exercise videos, apps, online platforms and telehealth media. These tools are not limited by environmental barriers and are fundamental international recommendations for maintaining mental health and physical health during the COVID-19 quarantine. There are various online group exercise classes that could be freely provided to the elderly. As recommended by The WHO Regional Office for Europe, following “online exercise classes” would be a positive way to be active as this method has demonstrated positive relevance to PA during self-isolation (Stay Physically Active during Self-Quarantine 2020). In addition, these methods for PA can help the elderly avoid the risk of being infected and encourage them to continue their physical activities within their own comfort zones and the safety of their homes. In this COVID-19 era, older people should be made aware of web-based applications that can keep them physically and mentally fit. Web-based applications that are available for older adults include Bold, Silver Sneakers Go, Britain’s National Health Service, Calm, C25K and Healthline (The Best Health and Fitness Apps for Seniors 2020). Furthermore, we think future healthcare provision will be reliant on artificial intelligence (AI). In fact, the era of AI medication seems inevitable. Patients can use AI chatbots at home to keep track of their health plans at the simplest level. It may be possible to remove anxiety and confusion associated with seniors by using artificial intelligence applications that remind them when to take their medication, when to see their doctors and even when to eat. Social robots powered by AI can go beyond this by providing senior citizens with some level of companionship. Social robots can also nudge self-care behaviors by tailoring their engagement (Greulich-Smith 2020). In summary, despite putting the blame on governments, it is our responsibility as citizens to make use of the available technologies to protect not just the health of our elderly but also our economy. These technologies need to be realized soon and made freely available. This development would facilitate increases in PA while reducing the economic and medical burdens associated with physical inactivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., B.C.C. and S.-H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J. and S.-H.C.; writing—review and editing, B.C.C., J.S.B. and F.D.; literature search and review, Y.G., W.L., D.T., R.S. and F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Gordon Cheung for his technical and administrative support to this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baker, Julien S., Alistair Cole, Dan Tao, Feifei Li, Wei Liang, Jojo Jiao, Yang Gao, and Rashmi Supriya. 2021. The preventive role of exercise on the physiological, psychological, and psychophysiological parameters of coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A mini review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14: 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Begg, Stephen, Vos Theo, Barker Bridget, Stevenson Chris, Stanley Lucy, and Lopenz Alan. 2007. The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia 2003. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/burden-of-disease-injury-australia-2003 (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  3. Cadilhac, Dominique A., Toby B. Cumming, Lauren Sheppard, Dora C. Pearce, Rob Carter, and Anne Magnus. 2011. The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: An Australian example. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 8: 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dubey, Neha, Priyanka Podder, and Dinkar Pandey. 2020. Knowledge of COVID-19 and Its Influence on Mindfulness, Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Psychological Flexibility in the Indian Community. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 589365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Food and Health Bureau. 2021. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Estimates of Health Expenditure: 1989/90–2019/20. Available online: https://www.fhb.gov.hk/statistics/en/dha/dha_summary_report.htm (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  6. Greulich-Smith, Tamsin. 2020. Can Artificial Intelligence Care for the Elderly? Available online: https://govinsider.asia/smart-gov/ai-powering-dubais-pursuit-happiness/ (accessed on 24 October 2021).
  7. Guure, Chris B., Noor A. Ibrahim, Mohd B. Adam, and Salmiah Md Said. 2017. Impact of Physical Activity on Cognitive Decline, Dementia, and Its Subtypes: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. BioMed Research International 2017: 9016924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hafner, Marco, Erez Yerushalmi, William D. Phillips, Jack Pollard, Advait Deshpande, Michael Whitmore, Francois Millard, and Christian Van Stolk. 2019. The Economic Benefits of a More Physically Active Population: An International Analysis. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, RR-4291-TVG, Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4291.html (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  9. Hafner, Marco, Erez Yerushalmi, Martin Stepanek, William Phillips, Jack Pollard, Advait Deshpande, Michael Whitmore, Francois Millard, Shaun Subel, and Christian Van Stolk. 2020. Estimating the global economic benefits of physically active populations over 30 years (2020–2050). British Journal of Sports Medicine 54: 1482–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hupin, David, Frédéric Roche, Vincent Gremeaux, Jean-Claude Chatard, Mathieu Oriol, Jean-Michel Gaspoz, Jean-Claude Barthélémy, and Pascal Edouard. 2015. Even a low-dose of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduces mortality by 22% in adults aged≥60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 49: 1262–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Marashi, Maryam Yvonne, Emma Nicholson, Michelle Ogrodnik, Barbara Fenesi, and Jennifer J. Heisz. 2021. A mental health paradox: Mental health was both a motivator and barrier to physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16: e0239244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nilsen, Per, Ida Seing, Carin Ericsson, Ove Andersen, Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Thomas Kallemose, and Jeanette Wassar Kirk. 2020. Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus: Protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden. Implementation Science Communications 1: 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Portegijs, Erja, Kirsi E. Keskinen, Johanna Eronen, Milla Saajanaho, Merja Rantakokko, and Taina Rantanen. 2020. Older Adults’ Physical Activity and the Relevance of Distances to Neighborhood Destinations and Barriers to Outdoor Mobility. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Portegijs, Erja, Kirsi E. Keskinen, Essi-Mari Tuomola, Timo Hinrichs, Milla Saajanaho, and Taina Rantanen. 2021. Older adults’ activity destinations before and during COVID-19 restrictions: From a variety of activities to mostly physical exercise close to home. Health Place 68: 102533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schuch, Felipe B., Davy Vancampfort, Joseph Firth, Simon Rosenbaum, Philip B. Ward, Edson S. Silva, Mats Hallgren, Antonio Ponce De Leon, Andrea L. Dunn, Andrea C. Deslandes, and et al. 2018. Physical Activity and Incident Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 175: 631–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shah, Tejal M., Michael Weinborn, Giuseppe Verdile, Hamid R. Sohrabi, and Ralph N. Martins. 2017. Enhancing Cognitive Functioning in Healthly Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Significance of Commercially Available Computerized Cognitive Training in Preventing Cognitive Decline. Neuropsychology Review 27: 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stay Physically Active during Self-Quarantine. 2020. WHO. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/technical-guidance/stay-physically-active-during-self-quarantine (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  18. Stephenson, John, Bauman Adrian, Armstrong Tim, Smith Ben, and Bellew Bill. 2000. The Cost of Illness Attributable to Physical Inactivity in Australia; A Preliminary Study. Available online: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/5F2C0F157D587DAECA257BF0001E44CE/$File/phys_costofillness.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  19. Suzuki, Yuta, Noriaki Maeda, Daigo Hirado, Taizan Shirakawa, and Yukio Urabe. 2020. Physical Activity Changes and Its Risk Factors among Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Adults during the COVID-19 Epidemic: Associations with Subjective Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tak, Erwin, Rebecca Kuiper, Astrid Chorus, and Marijke Hopman-Rock. 2013. Prevention of onset and progression of basic ADL disability by physical activity in community dwelling older adults: A meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews 12: 329–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. The Best Health and Fitness Apps for Seniors. 2020. Available online: https://www.thetechhelper.com/health-fitness-apps-seniors/ (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  22. Watson, Kathleen B., Susan A. Carlson, Janelle P. Gunn, Deborah A. Galuska, Ann O’Connor, Kurt J. Greenlund, and Janet E. Fulton. 2016. Physical Inactivity Among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older—United States, 2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65: 954–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, Minoru, Yasuyuki Kimura, Daisuke Ishiyama, Yuhei Otobe, Mizue Suzuki, Shingo Koyama, Takashi Kikuchi, Hitomi Kusumi, and Hajime Arai. 2020. Effect of the COVID-19 Epidemic on Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 24: 948–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zbrońska, Izabela, and Ewa Mędrela-Kuder. 2018. The level of physical activity in elderly persons with overweight and obesity. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny 69: 369–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Summary of the barriers to physical activity of older adults amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and the relevant effects to elderly’s health and economy.
Figure 1. Summary of the barriers to physical activity of older adults amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and the relevant effects to elderly’s health and economy.
Jrfm 15 00051 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiao, J.; Supriya, R.; Chow, B.C.; Baker, J.S.; Dutheil, F.; Gao, Y.; Chan, S.-H.; Liang, W.; Li, F.; Tao, D. COVID-19: Barriers to Physical Activity in Older Adults, a Decline in Health or Economy? J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020051

AMA Style

Jiao J, Supriya R, Chow BC, Baker JS, Dutheil F, Gao Y, Chan S-H, Liang W, Li F, Tao D. COVID-19: Barriers to Physical Activity in Older Adults, a Decline in Health or Economy? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022; 15(2):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiao, Jiao, Rashmi Supriya, Bik C. Chow, Julien S. Baker, Frédéric Dutheil, Yang Gao, Sze-Hoi Chan, Wei Liang, Feifei Li, and Dan Tao. 2022. "COVID-19: Barriers to Physical Activity in Older Adults, a Decline in Health or Economy?" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no. 2: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020051

APA Style

Jiao, J., Supriya, R., Chow, B. C., Baker, J. S., Dutheil, F., Gao, Y., Chan, S. -H., Liang, W., Li, F., & Tao, D. (2022). COVID-19: Barriers to Physical Activity in Older Adults, a Decline in Health or Economy? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020051

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop