Influences of Internal Control on Enterprise Performance: Does an Information System Make a Difference?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Development and Hypothesis Formulation
2.1. Contingency Theory Perspective
2.2. Formulation of Hypotheses
2.2.1. Contingency Factors and IC Quality
2.2.2. Organizational Culture and Management Support
2.2.3. Structure and Strategy
2.2.4. Information System (IS)
2.2.5. IS Maturity
2.2.6. Organizational Performance
2.2.7. The Moderating Role of IS Quality
3. Research Design and Data Collection
3.1. Research Method
3.2. Sample and Data Collection
3.3. Research Instruments
4. Data Analysis and Findings
4.1. The Outer Model
4.2. Testing the Hypotheses
5. Discussion
6. Implications and Future Research Directions
7. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abbaszadeh, Mohammad R., Mahdi Salehi, and Seyed M. Faiz. 2019. Association of information technology and internal controls of Iranian state agencies. International Journal of Law and Management 61: 133–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Kader, Magdy, and Robert Luther. 2008. The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis. The British Accounting Review 40: 2–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abernethy, Margaret A., Jan Bouwens, and Laurence Van. 2010. Leadership and Control System Design. Management Accounting Research 21: 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akisik, Orhan, and Graham Gal. 2017. The impact of corporate social responsibility and internal controls on stakeholders’ view of the firm and financial performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 8: 246–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, M. Shakaib, M. Awais S. Goraya, Aneela Malik, and Amer M. Aljarallah. 2018. Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities. Sustainability 10: 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al MohamadSaleh, Ahmad, and Saeed Alzahrani. 2023. Development of a Maturity Model for Software Quality Assurance Practices. Systems 11: 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Muharfi, Abdul-Rahman. A. 2010. Forms of Organization Change and Accountant Participation in the Sap Implementation Process: Case Study from Saudi Arabia. Information Technology Journal 9: 632–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Muhayfith, Sara, and Hani Shaiti. 2020. The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on Business Performance: With the Discussion on Its Relationship with Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6: 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Thuneibat, Ali A., Awad S. Al-Rehaily, and Yousef A. Basodan. 2015. The impact of internal control requirements on profitability of Saudi shareholding companies. International Journal of Commerce and Management 25: 196–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Turki, Umar M. 2011. An Exploratory Study of ERP Implementation in Saudi Arabia. Production Planning & Control 22: 403–13. [Google Scholar]
- Alzeban, A. 2015. The Impact of Culture on the Quality of Internal Audit: An Empirical Study. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 30: 57–77. [Google Scholar]
- Becker, Jan M., Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2018. Estimating moderating effects in PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM: Interaction term generation_data treatment. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 2: 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Changchit, Chuleeporn, Clyde W. Holsapple, and Donald L. Madden. 2001. Supporting Managers’ Internal Control Evaluations: An Expert System and Experimental Results. Decision Support Systems 30: 437–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenhall, Robert H., Jiha P. Kallunki, and Hanna Silvola. 2011. Exploring the Relationships between Strategy, Innovation, and Management Control Systems: The Roles of Social Networking, Organic Innovative Culture, and Formal Controls. Journal of Management Accounting Research 23: 99–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, Wynne W. 2010. How to Write up and Report Pls Analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, Methods and Applications Concepts. Edited by Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, Wynne W. Chin, J Jörg Henseler and Huiwen Wang. Berlin: Springer, pp. 655–90. [Google Scholar]
- COSO. 1992. Internal Control-Integrated Framework, New York, Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission. Available online: https://www.coso.org/guidance-on-ic (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- COSO. 2004. Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework, New York, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Available online: https://www.coso.org/guidance-erm (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Croteau, Anne M., and Francois Bergeron. 2001. An information technology trilogy: Business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 10: 77–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3: 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detert, James R., Roger G. Schroeder, and John J. Mauriel. 2000. A Framework for Linking Culture and Improvement Initiatives in Organisations. Academy of Management Review 25: 850–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, Donald De S., and Renato S. D. Souza. 2004. ERP Systems Maturity and Competitive Advantage. Paper presented at Innovations through Information Technology, Information Resource Management Association (IRMA) International Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 23–26; pp. 156–58. [Google Scholar]
- Doeleman, Henk J., Steven Have, and Kees Ahaus. 2012. The Moderating Role of Leadership in the Relationship between Management Control and Business Excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 23: 591–611. [Google Scholar]
- Donaldson, Lex. 2001. The Contingincey Theory of Orgenization USA. New York: USA Sage Piblication Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Doyle, Jeffrey, Weili Ge, and Sarah McVay. 2007. Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44: 193–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dropulić, Ivan, and Andrijana Rogošić. 2014. Formalization of management control systems: A study of companies in Croatia. Croatian Operational Research Review 5: 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felício, Teresa, Antonio Samagaio, and Ricardo Rodrigues. 2021. Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research 124: 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, Joseph G. 1998. Contingency Theory, Management Control Systems and Firm Outcomes: Past Results and Future Directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10: 47. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gable, Guy G., Darshana Sedera, and Taizan Chan. 2003. Enterprise System Success: A Measurement Model. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2003), Seattle, WA, USA, December 15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Granlund, Markus. 2011. Extending AIS Research to Management Accounting and Control Issues: A Research Note. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12: 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, Anil K., and V. Govindarajan. 1984. Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation. Academy of Management Journal 27: 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hailu, Tesfaye. 2014. The Impact of Information System (IS) on Organizational Performance: With Special Reference to Ethio-Telecom Southern Region, Hawassa. European Journal of Business and Management 6: 331–39. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, Joseph F., Rolph Anderson, Brry Babin, and William. C. Black. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, Joseph F., Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko A. Sarstedt. 2013. Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, MMatthew, and David Smith. 2009. Mentoring and turnover intentions in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations & Society 34: 695–704. [Google Scholar]
- Hamed, Ruba. 2023. The Role of Internal Control Systems in Ensuring Financial Performance Sustainability. Sustainability 15: 10206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handoyo, Bregitta R. M., and Bunga I. Bayunitri. 2021. The influence of internal audit and internal control toward fraud prevention. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management 3: 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, Frank. 2005. The Effects of Tolerance for Ambiguity and Uncertainty on the Appropriateness of Accounting Performance Measures. A Journal of Accounting, Finance, and Business Studies 41: 241–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoai, Tu Thanh, Bui Q. Hung, and Nguyen P. Nguyen. 2022. The impact of internal control systems on the intensity of innovation and organizational performance of public sector organizations in Vietnam: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Heliyon 8: e08954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holland, Christopher P., and Ben Light. 2001. A Stage Maturity Model for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Use. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 32: 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossin, Md Atab, Md. Sajjad Hosain, Michelle F. Frempong, Stephen S. Adu-Yeboah, and Mohitul. A. A. Mustafi. 2021. What Drives Sustainable Organizational Performance? The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Sustainable Organizational reputation. Sustainability 13: 12363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiung, Hsing-H., and Juo-L. Wang. 2014. Factors of Affecting Internal Control Benefits under ERP System An Empirical Study in Taiwan. International Business Research 7: 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Shi-M., Pei-G. Hsieh, Hsiu H. Tsao, and Hsu Pei-yu. 2008. A Structural study of Internal Control for ERP systems environment: A perspective from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Int. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 5: 102–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, Melanie, Stephan Zimmermann, Christopher Rentrop, and Carsten Felden. 2016. The Relation of Shadow Systems and ERP Systems—Insights from a Multiple-Case Study. Systems 4: 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hulland, John. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent. Strategic Management Journal 20: 195–204. [Google Scholar]
- Hussaini, Umaru, and Umar Muhammed. 2018. Effect of Internal Control on Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Management Research & Review 8: 13–32. [Google Scholar]
- Hutahayan, Benny. 2020. The mediating role of human capital and management accounting information system in the relationship between innovation strategy and internal process performance and the impact on corporate financial performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal 27: 1289–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IFAC. 2012. Evaluating and Improving Internal Control in Organizations. Available online: www.ifac.org/site/default/files/publications (accessed on 15 July 2022).
- Ittonen, Kim. 2010. Investor Reactions to Disclosures of Material Internal Control Weaknesses. Managerial Auditing Journal 25: 259–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarah, Baker A. F., Nidal Zaqeeba, Melfleh F. M. Al-Jarrah, Abdalla M. Al Badarin, and Zeyad Almatarneh. 2023. The Mediating Effect of the Internal Control System on the Relationship between the Accounting Information System and Employee Performance in Jordan Islamic Banks. Economies 11: 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaworski, Bernard J., and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. Marketorientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing 57: 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokipii, Annukka. 2010. Determinants and Consequences of Internal Control in Firms: A Contingency Theory Based Analysis. Journal of Management & Governance 14: 115–44. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, Mary C., Melinda Cline, and Sherry Ryan. 2006. Exploring knowledge sharing in ERP implementation: An organizational culture framework. Decision Support Systems 41: 411–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kehinde, Obasan, and Yusuf Soyebo. 2012. Management Information System as a Catalyst to Organisational Performance in the 21 Century: A Study of Selected Banks in Nigeria. American Journal of Business and Management 1: 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Suyon. 2023. Internal Control Managers’ Accounting Experiences on Audit Quality—Focus on ESG. International Journal of Financial Studies 11: 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Lorraine, Stacie Petter, Dutch Fayard, and Shani Robinson. 2011. On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12: 305–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linying, Dong, Neufeld Derrick, and Higgins Chris. 2009. Top Management Support of Enterprise Systems Implementations. Journal of Information Technology (Palgrave Macmillan) 24: 55–80. [Google Scholar]
- Mano, Aline P., Sergio E. Gouvea da Costa, Edson. P. de Lima, and Ricardo C. Mergulhão. 2023. Exploratory factor analysis of barriers to lean construction based on Brazilian managers’ perceptions. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 14: 94–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miles, Raymond E., and Charles C. Snow. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
- Monteiro, Albertina, and Catarina Cepêda. 2021. Accounting Information Systems: Scientific Production and Trends in Research. Systems 9: 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, John J. 2011. The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. Journal of Information Systems 25: 129–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, Barry L., Leon A. Kappelman, and V.R. Prybutok. 1997. A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment. Information Resources Monagement Journal 10: 6–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahavandi, Afsaneh, and Ali R. Malekzadeh. 1993. Leader Style in Strategy and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Management Studies 30: 405–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naranjo-Gil, David, and Frank Hartmann. 2006. How Top Management Teams Use Management Accounting Systems to Implement Strategy. Journal of Management Accounting Research 18: 21–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, Nguyen P., and Tu T. Hoai. 2023. Internal controls driven by mindfulness toward enhanced ethical behaviors: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Heliyon 9: e18002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nolan, Richard L. 1979. Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Business Review 57: 115–26. [Google Scholar]
- Nunnally, Jum C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
- Otley, David T. 1980. The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5: 413–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakurár, Miklos, Hossam Haddad, Janos Nagy, Jozsef Popp, and Judit Olah. 2019. The Impact of Supply Chain Integration and Internal Control on Financial Performance in the Jordanian Banking Sector. Sustainability 11: 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, Fernanda D. C., Henrique D. Verocai, Vinicius R. Cordeiro, Carlos F. S. Gomes, and Helder G. Costa. 2015. Bibliometric Analysis of Information Systems Related to Innovation. Procedia Computer Science 55: 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, Michael. 1980. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance; and Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
- Pugh, Derek, David Hickson, C. Hinings, and Celine Turner. 1968. Dimensions of organisational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 13: 65–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rae, Kirsty, and Nava Subramaniam. 2008. Quality of internal control procedures, Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal 23: 104–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragowsky, Arik, Paul Licker, and David Gefen. 2012. Organizational IT Maturity (OITM): A Measure of Organizational Readiness and Effectiveness to Obtain Value from Its Information Technology. Information Systems Management 29: 148–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahi, ABM F., Jeaneth Johansson, Arne Fagerström, and Marita Blomkvist. 2022. Sustainability Reporting and Management Control System: A Structured Literature Review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosini, Iin, Juniati Gunawan, and Dani. R. Hakim. 2020. The Contingent Fit between Management Control System and Capabilities on Sustainability Performance. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management 7: 375–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubino, Michele, Filippo Vitolla, and Antonello Garzoni. 2017. How IT controls improve the control environment. Management Research Review 40: 218–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, Maya, Ade F. Lubis, Azhar Maksum, Prihatin Lumbanraja, and Iskandar Muda. 2018. The influence of organization’s culture and internal control to corporate governance and its impact on state-owned enterprises corporate. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 13: 673–84. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, Mark, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2009. Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
- Shafie, Nur A., Marlia Othman, Zuraidh M. Sanusi, Razana J. Johari, Halim M. Noor, and Milen Baltov. 2019. The Effects of Organizational Structure, Organizational Culture and Environmental Factors on the Effectiveness of Internal Control in Social cooperatives. International Journal of Business & Management Science 9: 277–97. [Google Scholar]
- Shaiti, Hani, Yanqing Duan, and Magdy Abdel-kader. 2013. Investigating the Relationship between Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System and Internal Control: A Exploratory Study. Paper presented at the International conference on Business: Accounting, Finance, Management & Marketing, Athens, Greece, July 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Staniškis, Jurgis K., and Valdas Arbačiauskas. 2009. Sustainability performance indicators for industrial enterprise management. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 48: 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- Suh, Hanjun, Sunghun Chung, and Jinho Choi. 2017. An empirical analysis of a maturity model to assess information system success: A firm-level perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 36: 792–808. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, Lijuan, Xiaoju Wei, and Wwnjing Wang. 2023. Does Enterprise Internal Control Improve Environmental Performance—Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 15: 10199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turnbull. 1999. Internal Control Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code. London: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Walles (ICAEW), London Chartered Accountants Hall. [Google Scholar]
- Valipour, Hashem, Javad Moradi, and Mohammad H. Fatheh. 2012. The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning (Erp) on the Internal Controls Case Study: Esfahan Steel Company. European Journal of Social Sciences 28: 228–38. [Google Scholar]
- Verbeeten, Frank H. M. 2010. The Impact of Business Unit Strategy, Structure and Technical Innovativeness on Change in Management Accounting and Control Systems at the Business Unit Level: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Management 27: 123–43. [Google Scholar]
- Vinzi, Vincenzo E., Wynne W. Chin, Jorg Henseler, and Huiwen Wang. 2010. Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Voordijk, Hans, Arjen Van Leuven, and Albertus Laan. 2003. Enterprise Resource Planning in a large construction firm: Implementation analysis. Construction Management & Economics 21: 511–52. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Kun, Lichen Liu, Mengyue Deng, and Yaxian Feng. 2023. Internal Control, Environmental Uncertainty and Total Factor Productivity of Firms—Evidence from Chinese Capital Market. Sustainability 15: 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widyastuti, Maria, Deograsias Y. Y. Ferdinand, and Yustinus B. Hermanto. 2023. Strengthening Formal Credit Access and Performance through Financial Literacy and Credit Terms in Micro, Small and Medium Businesses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16: 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, Margaret. 2009. A Contingency Theory Perspective on the Risk Management Control System within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research 20: 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Xinyue, and Shaolun Zeng. 2022. R&D Investment, Internal Control and Enterprise Performance—An Empirical Study Based on the Listed Companies in China of the Core Industry of the Digital Economy. Sustainability 14: 16700. [Google Scholar]
- Yohans, Jordy A., Agus Rahayu, and Puspo D. Dirgantari. 2023. Analysis of the Effect of Electronic Customer Relationship Management and Customer Engagement on Customer Loyalty on Gojek Online Transportation Services Users. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management 4: 381–91. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Ying, Dongxiao Niu, and Hongtao Zheng. 2009. Research on the Determinants of the Quality of Internal Control: Evidence from China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, Xi’an, China, December 26–27; pp. 503–6. [Google Scholar]
Construct | Number of Measures | Source |
---|---|---|
1. IS maturity | 5 items | (Nolan 1979) |
2. Culture (collaboration) | 3 items | (Detert et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2006) |
3. Top management support | 5 items | (Jaworski and Kohli 1993; Nahavandi and Malekzadeh 1993; Linying et al. 2009) |
4. Strategy (prospector) | 5 items | (Croteau and Bergeron 2001; Felício et al. 2021) |
5. Structure (formalization) | 3items | (Pugh et al. 1968; Donaldson 2001) |
6. IS quality | 7 items | (DeLone and McLean 1992; Myers et al. 1997; Gable et al. 2003) |
7. Internal control quality | 4 items | (COSO 2004) |
8. Performance | 4 items | (Staniškis and Arbačiauskas 2009; Akram et al. 2018; AlMuhayfith and Shaiti 2020) |
Characteristics | N | n% | |
---|---|---|---|
Firm Type | Private firm | 6 | 5.5% |
Limited partnership | 27 | 25% | |
Joint liability firm | 42 | 39.5% | |
Public firm | 33 | 30% | |
Qualification | Bachelor in Acc. or Fin. | 69 | 64% |
Bachelor in Bus. Man. | 10 | 10% | |
Diploma in Acc. or IS | 29 | 26% | |
IT Brand | Well-known | 80 | 74% |
Less well-known | 28 | 26% |
Construct Item | Loading | CA | CR | AVE | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management Support | |||||
-Supporting research, development, and innovation | 0.692 | 0.758 | 0.857 | 0.688 | |
-Preferring to delegate tasks to others | 0.835 | ||||
-Staff are involved in strategic planning and technical direction | 0.911 | ||||
Culture (Collaboration) | |||||
-Usually, staff choose to work in project teams | 0.864 | 0.754 | 0.860 | 0.674 | |
-Staff are willing to share data between them | 0.895 | ||||
-Entity inspires its staff to be free in their thinking and in producing ways to do their teamwork-related jobs | 0.690 | ||||
Strategy | |||||
-Development of new products and services is supported by the entity’s mission and actions | 0.778 | 0.877 | 0.916 | 0.732 | |
-Entity leads its sector in the direction of innovation | 0.856 | ||||
-Usually, the entity‘s actions lead to new rounds of competitive advantage in the sector | 0.892 | ||||
-Entity is generally involved in high-risk projects | 0.890 | ||||
Structure (Formalization) | |||||
-Entity has diversified occupational specialties | 0.869 | 0.762 | 0.892 | 0.805 | |
-Description of the job is presented | 0.925 | ||||
IS Maturity | |||||
-Number of IS users has increased since implementation | 0.875 | 0.827 | 0.882 | 0.653 | |
-IS applications that are used satisfy the entity’s needs | 0.833 | ||||
-Satisfaction with the control processes and standards of the IS’s resources | 0.760 | ||||
-Since the implementation of the IS, the control of traditional data processing activities has become tighter | 0.759 | ||||
IS Quality | 0.29 | ||||
-Entity’s [IS] is easy to use | 0.861 | 0.843 | 0.889 | 0.617 | |
-Entity’s [IS] is easy to learn | 0.805 | ||||
-Entity’s [IS] meets the users’ requirements | 0.808 | ||||
-Entity’s [IS] requires a minimum number of computers | 0.656 | ||||
-Data within the [IS] are fully integrated | 0.784 | ||||
Internal Control Quality | 0.57 | ||||
-Compliance with applicable laws and regulations | 0.771 | 0.803 | 0.871 | 0.627 | |
-Effectiveness and efficiency of operations | 0.858 | ||||
-Reliability of financial reporting | 0.793 | ||||
-Management efficiently establishes its strategic objectives | 0.743 | ||||
Performance | 0.39 | ||||
-Entity responds quickly to the first signs of opportunity/innovation | 0.699 | 0.652 | 0.811 | 0.590 | |
-Normally, profitability targets are achieved | 0.770 | ||||
-Operation and product characteristics are improving | 0.830 |
Culture | Formalization | ICQ | ISQ | MS | Maturity | Perform. | Strategy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Culture | 0.821 | |||||||
Formalization | 0.441 | 0.897 | ||||||
ICQ | 0.352 | 0.582 | 0.792 | |||||
ISQ | 0.200 | 0.225 | 0.479 | 0.786 | ||||
MS | 0.432 | 0.350 | 0.488 | 0.125 | 0.818 | |||
Maturity | 0.223 | 0.240 | 0.467 | 0.546 | 0.210 | 0.808 | ||
Perform. | 0.408 | 0.417 | 0.606 | 0.347 | 0.551 | 0.394 | 0.768 | |
Strategy | 0.422 | 0.638 | 0.628 | 0.329 | 0.514 | 0.281 | 0.500 | 0.855 |
Construct | Cross-Validity Communality |
---|---|
1. IS maturity | 0.69 |
2. Culture (collaboration) | 0.87 |
3. Top management support | 0.76 |
4. Strategy (prospector) | 0.74 |
5. Structure (formalization) | 0.78 |
6. IS quality | 0.73 |
7. Internal control quality | 0.61 |
8. Performance | 0.65 |
Beta | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | T Statistics | p Values | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Culture → ICQ | −0.045 | 0.077 | 0.274 | 0.555 | Non-Sig |
Formalization → ICQ | 0.302 | 0.093 | 3.260 | 0.001 | Sig |
MS → ICQ | 0.248 | 0.068 | 2.627 | 0.000 | Sig |
Maturity → ISQ | 0.546 | 0.088 | 6.178 | 0.000 | Sig |
Strategy → ICQ | 0.222 | 0.091 | 2.433 | 0.015 | Sig |
ISQ → ICQ | 0.316 | 0.088 | 3.606 | 0.000 | Sig |
ICQ → Perform. | 0.563 | 0.075 | 7.437 | 0.000 | Sig |
ISQ × ICQ → Perform. | 0.167 | 0.083 | 2.026 | 0.043 | Sig |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alshaiti, H. Influences of Internal Control on Enterprise Performance: Does an Information System Make a Difference? J. Risk Financial Manag. 2023, 16, 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120518
Alshaiti H. Influences of Internal Control on Enterprise Performance: Does an Information System Make a Difference? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023; 16(12):518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120518
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlshaiti, Hani. 2023. "Influences of Internal Control on Enterprise Performance: Does an Information System Make a Difference?" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16, no. 12: 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120518
APA StyleAlshaiti, H. (2023). Influences of Internal Control on Enterprise Performance: Does an Information System Make a Difference? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(12), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120518