Characterization and Analysis of Energy Demand Patterns in Airports
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Literature Review
- Engineering methods: They are also called forward modeling, classical or white box. These methods use detailed physics to model the energy behaviour and thermal dynamic of the system under evaluation, knowing the inputs and aiming to predict the outputs [11]. They are characterized by the use of specific software tools, such as DOE-2 (Version 2.2, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA), EnergyPlus (Version 8.2, USA Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA), Transient Systems Simulation Program (TRNSYS 17, Thermal Energy System Specialists, Madison, WI, USA), etc. [14]. This methodology requires a lot of detail and a high level of technical knowledge, since it is necessary to develop appropriate models whose accuracy increases as more information and data on the characteristics of the system are available. To solve this technical disadvantage, simplified methods have been developed such as the degree-day or bin method [15].
- Statistical methods: They are also called inverse modeling, data-driven or black-box. These methods require no physical data about the system under evaluation. Both inputs and outputs are known, and historical data are used to define the mathematical description of the system by statistical methods whose variables have no physical meaning. Examples of these statistical models would be simple or multiple linear regression [16] or conditional demand analysis [17].
- Artificial methods: These methods, as in the case of the statistical methods, use historical data to model the system under evaluation, and are very useful tools to solve nonlinear problems of energy consumption. Examples of these artificial models would be neural networks [18], support vector machines [19], decision tree [20] or genetic algorithms [21].
- Hybrid methods: They are also called gray-box and use simplified detailed physics to simulate the behavior of the systems, thus minimizing the need of training data and calculation time since statistical methods based on the operation data are used to obtain the coefficients of the model [22]. Examples of these artificial models would be resistance capacitance (RC) models [23].
- Bill-based methods: This would be the simplest way to model and quantify the energy use because electricity bills are available for most owners. However, this data, usually collected with a monthly frequency, do not provide enough information for the assessment of energy efficiency or for characterization because such data are inherently aggregated across end-uses. Examples of these methods are shown in [42,43].
- Monitoring methods: They allow better energy control of buildings or infrastructure, and, the quantification of energy efficiency and the detection of facility faults. They can be classified between end-use-submetering methods, non-intrusive load monitoring methods and building energy management systems (BEMS)-based methods. Sub-metering methods place separate metering hardware in each system under evaluation, obtaining energy use of individual loads. Such methods are principally used because they are a precise way to obtain accuracy energy data for energy investigations, although they are normally considered to be too expensive for conventional buildings [44]. The non-intrusive load monitoring method is a pattern recognition-based method which is capable of analyzing energy consumption placing only a small amount of hardware [45]. Lastly, BEMS are computer-based systems that help to manage, control and monitor the facilities under evaluation, typically heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and lighting, and the energy consumption of the devices used [46]. They also provide the information and the tools to understand the energy behaviour of buildings and to control and improve energy efficiency.
1.2. Aim and Scope
2. Case of Study: Seve Ballesteros-Santander Airport
3. Methodology
3.1. Step 1: General Airport Characterization
3.1.1. Generalities
3.1.2. Actors Involved
3.1.3. Tools
3.1.4. Methods and Materials
3.1.5. General Airport Characterization Conclusions
3.2. Step 2: Electric Data Characterization
3.2.1. Generalities
3.2.2. Actors involved
3.2.3. Tools
3.2.4. Methods and materials
- and are the theoretical total active power during closing and opening hours of the airport, respectively;
- and are the theoretical active power of fixed loads during closing and opening hours of the airport, respectively;
- is the theoretical active power of opening loads during opening hours of the airport;
- is the theoretical active power of variable loads during opening hours of the airport;
- represents a time slot, typically 15 min;
- represents a set of time slots;
- represents a subset of time slots during opening hours of the airport;
- represents a subset of time slots during closing hours of the airport.
- Electric charge/Load: Name or description of the load.
- Facility associated: The most common classification of electric charges by facility/system in airports are HVAC, lighting, airfield lighting, radio navigation, data center processing, ICT, signaling and information, security, meteorological, electromechanical, and various equipment.
- Typology of charge: Fixed, opening or variable loads, as explained previously.
- Number of elements: The number of equal charges in that location.
- Company: The electric charge can be associated to the airport operator or to the different companies located at the airport.
- Location: Zone, building, plant or area.
- Electric power: Electrical power under normal conditions and under stand-by conditions. It is based on both the theoretical electric power shown in the corresponding technical datasheet of the load under evaluation and on specific electric measurements to confirm or to obtain this data. In the case study, a 325 Clamp Meter (Fluke, Washington, DC, USA) was used for the energy measurements of individual loads.
- Operation hours: Annual operating hours including stand-by hours. This time can be determined by several sources: Information provided by maintenance personnel, information obtained during visits, or output data of the measuring equipment. Number of days: The number of days per year that the facility is operative.
- External influences: Description of the external influences that can affect the greater or lesser use of such electric charge, such as the temperature, the daylighting, or the number of passengers and air operations.
3.2.5. Step 2: Electric Data Characterization Conclusions
- (1)
- Fixed loads: Electric charges with continuous operation 24/7, representing 8% of the loads and 26% of energy consumption in 2015 for the case study. These loads are principally composed of data center processing, security, meteorological and radio navigation systems.
- (2)
- Opening loads: Electric charges with operation only during the opening hours of the airport, independently of the number of passengers or air operations, representing 76% of the loads and 54% of energy consumption in 2015 for the case study. These loads are mainly composed of HVAC, lighting, ICT and signaling and information systems.
- (3)
- Variable loads: Electric charges with variable operation during the opening hours of the airport depending on the number of passengers or aircraft operations, representing 16% of the loads and 20% of energy consumption in 2015 for the case study. These loads are mainly composed of airfield lighting and electromechanical systems.
- (1)
- Temperature: 3.3% of the loads representing 30.5% of energy consumption in 2015 are influenced by the outside temperature, all related to HVAC systems.
- (2)
- Daylighting: 65% of the loads representing 25% of energy consumption in 2015 are influenced by daylighting, all related to lighting and airfield lighting systems.
- (3)
- Aircraft operations: 12.5% of the loads representing 9% of energy consumption in 2015 are influenced by the number of air operations, all related to airfield lighting, hangers and fuel storage building.
- (4)
- Passengers: 3.5% of the loads representing 11% of energy consumption in 2015 are influenced by the number of passengers, principally related to the electromechanical facilities of the terminal building and the external companies located at airport.
3.3. Step 3: Electric Pattern Analysis
3.3.1. Generalities
3.3.2. Actors Involved
3.3.3. Tools
3.3.4. Methods and Materials
- Night load: Night power demand (or during closed hours).
- Base load: The minimum electric power demand that is necessary to maintain operative 24/7.
- Morning start-up and ramp-up: The effect of the start-up and ramp-up operation on power demand, identifying the amount of electric charges that are switched-on.
- Peak or maximum demand: The time, magnitude and duration of peak demand period.
- Evening setback and shut-down: The effect of the evening setback and shut-down operation on power demand, identifying the amount of electric charges that are switched-off.
- Weather effects: The effect of weather conditions on the energy demand can be identified from day to night and comparing demand profiles in each season. In the case of airports will be focused on outside temperature and daylighting influences.
- Interactions: Interactions between systems may be evident, for example, increasing energy demand when an aircraft is landing or taking-off.
- Weekly analysis: The repetition of the energy pattern must be studied in order to establish the energy behavior on weekdays and weekends or holidays.
- Monthly analysis: The influence of the different seasons, mainly related to the outside temperature and daylighting on the energy demand must be analyzed.
- Other analyses: Annual energy consumption as well as general comparisons between some of the main external influencers and the main energy consumption buildings or facilities must be done, comparing, for example, terminal building energy consumption versus number of passengers, HVAC energy consumption versus outside temperature, lighting energy consumption versus number of hours of daylighting or airfield lighting energy consumption versus number of hours of daylighting.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. General Analysis
- Night load: Between 11:30 p.m. and 06:00 a.m. the airport is closed, so it has an average energy demand of around 175 kW, 125 kW of which corresponds to the terminal building, 25 kW to HVAC systems in the terminal building that are in stand-by during the night, and the other 25 kW to other airport buildings. This night load is composed of fixed loads, stand-by loads of facilities that are switched-off during the night but are plugged-in, and loads related to facilities that are switched-on but should be off due to inefficiencies.
- Morning start-up: At 06:00 a.m., the activity of the terminal building, urbanization and several buildings start, as reflected in the schedule of Table 2, producing a morning start-up and ramp-up between 6:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m., related to the switching-on of facilities like HVAC, lighting, ICT and information and signaling systems, etc. This ramp-up also includes all the equipment needed by the airport operator and the different companies located at the airport, and their employees. This energy demand, called morning start-up, is the minimum necessary to start the process of attention to passengers and aircraft at 7:30 a.m., and is composed of fixed and opening loads, which are independent of the number of passengers and aircraft operations.
- Peak or maximum demand: It occurs approximately at 7:15 a.m. due to the mandatory test of all airfield lighting for 10–15 min, which increments the energy demand of the aiport aproximately 80–90 kW. This on-peak can be maintained longer if some air operations are scheduled at 7:30 a.m., and by ATC is considered necessary to keep them switched-on. This peak demand occurs again in the evening after sunset, due to the repeated mandatory test of all airfield lighting during the evenings. The schedule of this second test is variable throughout the year depending on the sunset hour.
- Operative energy demand: Between 7:30 a.m. and sunset, period during which the airport is open, a variable energy demand exists due to different external influences. This operative energy demand is composed of fixed, opening and variable loads, mainly associated to the terminal building, urbanization and airfield lighting. During the day, this energy demand decreases and stabilizes due to the progressive shut-down of urbanization and airfield lighting, and the lower energy demand of HVAC systems due to thermal inertia of terminal building.
- Evening setback: Between sunset and 9:30 p.m. approximately, the energy demand increases again due to the need for artificial lighting and airfield lighting in case of aircraft operations.
- Evening shut-down: Between 09:30 p.m. and 11:30 p.m., the progressive shut-down of electric charges takes place until the night load is reached.
4.2. Hourly Analysis
- Terminal building: This quarter-hourly power demand curve has been plotted with the power demand data collected during the 18 February 2015 by the power analyzer located at the main electrical panelboard that supplies electricity to the terminal building. As was seen previously in Table 7, the terminal building represents 76% of annual energy consumption of the airport, and therefore is also the main influencer of the airport energy demand patterns. Due to its importance, the terminal building curve is disagreggated and explained by facility later in Figure 12.
- Urbanization and Parking (Outside Lighting): This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the power demand data collected during the 18 February 2015 from the three electricity meters located at the main electrical panelboards that supply electricity to this area, in the period that lighting systems were switched-on. This lighting is automatized through astronomical time switches, having a constant power demand of 44 kW from the opening hour of the airport at 6:00 a.m. until 9:00 a.m. (approximately 45 after the sunrise), and between 06:00 p.m. (approximately 45 before the sunset) and 00:00 a.m. (30 min after the closing hour of the airport). During nights, only a minimum lighting is switched-on for security reasons, with a constant power demand of 1 kW.
- Aircraft movement area (Airfield Lighting): This quarter-hourly power demand curve has been plotted with the power demand data collected during 18 February 2015 from the three electricity meters located at the main electrical panelboards that supply electricity to this area. On the one hand, this airfield lighting is switched-on based on the requirements established by ATC service depending on the flights schedules. As it can be seen in Figure 11 and Table 11, the influence of aircraft operations on the power demand of this area is clearly reflected during the time periods associated with flight schedules and without daylighting, with on-peaks of 70 kW approximately. On the other hand, during the rest of the opening hours of the airport with daylighting, a minimum constant power demand of approximately 3.5 kW is consumed, related principally to aircraft warning lights and similars devices. During nights, some airfield lightings located in the apron area remain switched-on in order to facilitate aircrafts maintenance tasks, with a constant power demand of 4 kW. As previously commented, at 7:15 a.m. all airfield lighting is switched-on for 10–15 min, which increments the energy demand of the aiport aproximately 80–90 kW, in order to test the operation of all airfield lighting. This test is also repeated in the evening after sunset, in this case at approximately 07:15 p.m.
- Others: The term ‘others’ refers to the remaining buildings not included previously (control tower, radio navigation systems buildings and auxiliary buildings), which only represent the 12% of the energy consumption in 2015 for the case study. This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the difference between the power demand data collected by the power analyzer located at the main electrical panelboard that supplies electricity to the entire airport during the 18 February 2015, and the sum of the power demand data of terminal building, aircraft movement area and urbanization and parking seen previously. These buildings hardly affect to the energy demand patterns of the airport, representing a small fraction of them. Their power demand varies between the 23 kW during nights, mainly due to the fixed loads related to the radio navigation systems and control tower, and approximately 40 kW during opening hours of the airport, due to the operation and auxiliary services needed by the airport staff during this time, such as HVAC, ICT, various equipment, etc.
- Data center processing: This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the power demand data collected during 18 February 2015 from the electricity meter located at the main electrical panelboards that supply electricity to this facility. This facility contains fixed loads, with continuous operation 24/7 generating a constant power demand of approximately 33 kW.
- Security: The same issue occurs with this facility that contains fixed loads with continuous operation 24/7 generating a constant power demand of approximately 20 kW. This quarter-hourly power demand curve has been plotted with the power demand data collected during the 18 February 2015 from the three electricity meters located at the main electrical panelboards that supply electricity to the security systems.
- Information and Signaling: This facility is composed of fixed loads (related to specific computer information systems that must be switched-on 24/7) and opening loads (related to signaling and information monitor systems that are only switched-on during the openings hours of the airport). This behavior can be observed in Figure 12, where a constant power demand of 11 kW is maintained during nights and 15 kW additional are added during the opening hours of the airport. This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the power demand data collected during 18 February 2015 from the three electricity meters located at the main electrical panelboards that supply electricity to this facility.
- Electromechanical: This facility is mainly composed of variable loads depending on the flight schedules. As it can be seen in Figure 12, several demand peaks between 10–15 kW appear just approximately one hour before and after the scheduled flights presented in Table 11, related principally to luggage delivery process. During nights, a constant power demand of approximately 2 kW is consumed related to the stand-by of these facilities. This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the power demand data collected during 18 February 2015 from the electricity meter located at the main electrical panelboard that supplies electricity to the luggage facility, and in the case of elevators, scalators and automatic doors, based on estimations from the energy data collected in the energy inventory. In summary, electromechanical facility represents a small fraction of the energy demand pattern of the terminal building, changing its peak demand depending on the flights schedules.
- Lighting: As in the previous case of urbanization and parking, terminal lighting is mainly used during the periods of the day without daylighting and during opening hours of the airport. Inside the terminal building, lighting is automatized for public spaces (departures, arrivals, check-in, etc.) through BEMS systems between 06:00 a.m. and 11:30 p.m., with more or less electric circuits switched-on in these areas depending on the external brightness. As it can be seen in Figure 12, the hours with the highest power demand related to lighting systems are from the opening hour of the terminal building at 06:00 a.m. until 8:30 a.m. (approximately 15 min. after the sunrise), and between 06:30 p.m. (approximately 15 min. before the sunset) and the closing hour of the terminal building, with a power demand of approximately 75–90 kW. This facility greatly influences the morning ramp-up just when the airport is opening and the evening set-back, and throughout the day its power demand decreases or increases in function of the hours of daylighting and brightness, which will be variable depending on the day of the year and its corresponding sunrise, sunset and meteorological conditions. During nights, only a minimum lighting is switched-on inside the terminal for security reasons, with a constant power demand of approximately 1 kW. This quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the power demand data collected during 18 February 2015 from the five electricity meters located at the main electrical panelboard that supply electricity to the lighting facility in public spaces, and on usage estimations from the energy data collected in the energy inventory for the case of offices and lighting locations without electricity meters for this specific day.
- HVAC: It represents the main energy consumer of the terminal building, nearly 35% of the annual energy consumption in 2015, and is strongly dependent on the outside temperature and the set-point operation, 21 °C in the case of heating during winter season. Likewise, HVAC systems in public spaces are automatized through BEMS systems between 06:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., generating a morning ramp-up between 06:00 a.m. and 08:00 a.m. due to the start-up of all devices in order to, in this case, to heat the terminal building until the set-point chosen (21 °C in winter and 25 °C in summer). Throughout the day, this power demand decreases due to the thermic inertia of the building. As will be seen in the monthly analysis, this on-peak and later demand will be variable as a function of the season of the year. During nights, only a minimum constant power demand of 25 kW remains, related to the stand-by of the HVAC equipment. This quarter-hourly power demand curve has been plotted with the power demand data stored during the 18 February 2015 by the power analyzer located at the main electrical panelboard that supplies electricity to the HVAC system of the terminal building.
- Others: The term others represent the remaining facilities not included previously (ICT and various equipment), that due to the multitude of electric circuits related to them, is not possible to have direct metered data about these facilities. For this reason, this quarter-hourly power demand curve is based on the difference between the power demand data collected by the power analyzer located at the main electrical panelboard that supplies electricity to the entire terminal building during the 18 February 2015, and the sum of the power demand of lighting, electromechanical, information and signaling, security and data center processing facilities seen previously. During nights, a power demand of approximately 50–55 kW remains, due to the fixed loads associated with the Equipment various facility (refrigerators, ATMs, etc.) and the ICT facility (network communication devices, etc.), to the stand-by loads that are switched-off during the night but are plugged-in (computers, monitors, etc.), and loads related to facilities that are switched-on but should be off due to inefficiencies. During the opening hours, the power demand varies between 65 and 85 kW, principally due to the operation and services required by airport staff and passengers.
4.3. Weekly Analysis
4.4. Seasonal and Monthly Analysis
4.5. Yearly Analysis
4.6. Other Analyses
4.7. Error Analysis
4.8. Future Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AENA | Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (In Spanish) |
AIP | aeronautical information publication |
ATC | air traffic control |
BEMS | building energy management systems |
CCTV | closed circuit television |
CHP | combined heat and power |
DSM | demand side management |
EPI | energy performance indicators |
HVAC | heating, ventilation and air conditioning |
ICAO | International Civil Aviation Organization |
ICT | information and communication technologies |
LT | local time |
RC | resistance capacitance |
TRNSYS | Transient Systems Simulation Program |
References
- Aerodrome Design and Operations, 5th ed.; International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): Montreal, QC, Canada, 2009.
- Ashford, N.; Mumayiz, S.; Wright, P. Airport Engineering, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds, T.; Neufville, R.; Beloboba, P.; Odoni, A. Airport Systems, Planning, Design and Management, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Professional: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ortega, S.; Manana, M. Energy research in airports: A review. Energies 2016, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corporate Responsibility Report 2014, 1st ed.; Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aerea (AENA): Madrid, Spain, 2015.
- Ministry of Industry, Energy and Turism of Spain. Energy in Spain 2014; Technical General Secretary: Madrid, Spain, 2015. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- London Heathrow Airport. Environmental Report 2014. Available online: http://www.heathrow.com/company/community-and-environment/responsible-heathrow/reports-and-further-reading (accessed on 1 June 2016).
- Frankfurt Airport. Environmental Report 2014. Available online: http://www.fraport.com/content/fraport/en/investor-relations/events-und-publications/publications/annual-reports.html (accessed on 1 June 2016).
- Swan, L.G.; Ugursal, V.I. Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1819–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Yan, C.; Xiao, F. Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 873–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Magoules, F. A review on the prediction of building energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 3586–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foucquier, A.; Robert, S.; Suard, F.; Stephan, L.; Jay, A. State of the art in building modeling and energy performances prediction: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fumo, N. A review on the basics of building energy estimation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crawley, D.B.; Hand, J.W.; Kummert, M.; Griffith, B.T. Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Homoud, M.S. Computer-aided building energy analysis techniques. Build. Environ. 2001, 36, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fumo, N.; Biswas, M.A. Regresssion analysis for prediction of residential energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 47, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aranda, A.; Ferreira, G.; Mainar-Toledo, M.D.; Scarpelline, S.; Sastresa, E.L. Multiple regression models to predict the anual energy consumption in the Spanish banking sector. Energy Build. 2012, 49, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalogirou, S.A. Artificial neural networks in energy applications in buildings. Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 2006, 1, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, F.; Magoules, F.; Lherminier, F. Vapniks learning theory applied to energy consumption forecasts in residential buildings. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2008, 85, 1563–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Haghighat, F.; Fung, B.; Yoshino, H. A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1637–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ooka, R.; Komamura, K. Optimal design method for building energy systems using genetic algorithms. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y. Gray predicting heory and application of energy consumption of building heat-moisture system. Build. Environ. 1999, 34, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, J.E.; Chaturvedi, N. An inverse gray-box model for transient building load prediction. HVAC&R Res. 2002, 8, 73–99. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Xie, K. A prediction model based on unbiased grey Markov for airport energy consumption prediction. In Proceedings of the 2013 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Changsha, China, 7–8 November 2013.
- Huang, H.; Chen, L. A hybrid model predictive control scheme for energy and cost saving in commercial buildings: Simulation and experiment. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, USA, 1–3 July 2015; pp. 256–261.
- Huang, H.; Chen, L. A new model predictive control scheme for energy and cost saving in commercial buildings: An airport terminal building study. Build. Environ. 2015, 89, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Chen, L. Model predictive control for energy-efficient buildings: An airport terminal building study. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), Taichung, China, 18–20 June 2014.
- Chen, J.; Xiao, W.; Qian, G. Prediction of airport energy consumption using a hybrid grey neural network model. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 608–609, 1252–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaras, C.A.; Dascalaki, E.; Gaglia, A.; Droutsa, K. Energy conservation potential, HVAC installations and operational issues in Hellenic airports. Energy Build. 2003, 35, 1105–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Yu, N.; Lei, B.; Rong, X.; Yang, L. Research on indoor environment for the terminal 1 of Chengdu Shuangliu international airport. In Proceedings of the 11th International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, UK, 27–30 July 2009.
- Ma, J.S.; Liu, X.T.; Zhuang, D.M.; Wang, S.G. CFD-based design of the natural ventilation system of the traffic center of T3 Beijing International Airport. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 291–294, 3292–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raymond, M.H. Air flow analysis for large spaces: Computational fluid dynamics and reduced-scale physical model tests. In Proceedings of the Asian Pacific Conference on Computational Mechanics, Hong Kong, China, 26 November 1991; pp. 1705–1711.
- Meng, Q.L.; Chen, Z.L. Simulation and research on indoor environment control mode basing on thermal comfort: A case study in the aviation building in Sanya airport. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, Beijing, China, 3–6 September 2007; pp. 161–168.
- Griffith, B.; Pless, S.; Talbert, B.; Deru, M.; Torcellini, P. Energy Design Analysis and Evaluation of a Proposed air Rescue and Firefighting Administration Building for Teterboro Airport; National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Zeren, F. Energy Performance Analysis of Adnan Menderes International Airport. Master’s Thesis, Science in Energy Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey, March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.; Jin, X.; Du, Z.; Fan, B.; Yang, X. Modeling and simulation of the airport terminal air conditioning system based on Energyplus. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2010, 44, 745–748. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, X.; Jin, X.; Fan, B.; Du, Z.; Zeng, X. Evaluation on air conditioning’s operating property of airport terminal based on hierarchal cluster. CIESC J. 2012, 36, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, K.; Zhu, N.; Tian, Z.; Wang, M.L. Analysis of energy-saving design of glass curtain wall in the terminal. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 280, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangiorgi, M.; Maellas, J.; Sanglier, G. Energy consumption optimization of a small Spanish airport. In Proceedings of the 9th International IBPSA Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 15–18 August 2005.
- Gowreesunker, B.L.; Tassou, S.A.; Kolokotroni, M. Coupled TRNSYS-CFD simulations evaluating the performance of PCM plate heat exchangers in an airport terminal building displacement conditioning system. Build. Environ. 2013, 65, 32–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falvo, M.C.; Santi, F.; Acri, R.; Manzan, E. Sustainable airports and NZEB: The real case of Rome International Airport. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Rome, Italy, 10–13 June 2013; pp. 1492–1497.
- Field, A.J.; Soper, J.; Jones, P.; Bordass, W.; Grigg, P. Energy performance of occupied non-domestic buildings: Assessment by analysing end-use energy consumption. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 1997, 18, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abkari, H. Validation of an algorithm to disaggregate whole-building hourly electrical load into end uses. Energy 1995, 20, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar]
- Philip, Y.; Chow, W.K. A discussion on potentials of saving energy use for commercial buildings in Hong Kong. Energy 2007, 32, 83–94. [Google Scholar]
- Pihala, H. Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring System Based on a Modern kWh-Meter; VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Publications: Espoo, Finland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Masoero, M.; Silvi, C.; Toniolo, J. Energy performance assessment of HVAC systems by inspection and monitoring. In Proceedings of the 10th REHVA World Congress Climate 2010, Antalya, Turkey, 9–12 May 2010.
- Mathieu, J.L.; Price, P.N.; Kiliccote, S.; Piette, M.A. Quantifiying changes in building electricity use, with application to demand response. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2011, 2, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, J.H.; Hong, W.H.; Seo, Y.K. Characteristic analysis of peak load in electricity on large scale hotels considering the energy efficiency. Int. J. Smart Home 2014, 8, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gul, M.; Patidar, S. Understanding the energy consumption and occupancy of a multi-purpose academic building. Energy Build. 2015, 87, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lanzisera, S.; Dawson-Haggerty, S.; Iris Cheung, H.Y.; Taneja, J.; Culler, D.; Brown, R. Methods for detailed energy data collection of miscellaneous and electronic loads in a commercial office building. Build. Environ. 2013, 65, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M.; Park, H.C. Comparison of building energy demand for hotels, hospitals and offices in Korea. Energy 2015, 92, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M.; Park, H.C. Building energy demand patterns for department stores in Korea. Appl. Energy 2012, 90, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, I.; Thomson, M.; Infield, D.; Clifford, C. Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pedrini, A.; Westphal, F.S.; Lamberts, R. A methodology for building energy modeling and calibration in warm climates. Build. Environ. 2002, 37, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilkiş, Ş.; Kilkiş, Ş. Benchmarking airports based on a sustainability ranking index. J. Clean. Prod. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upham, P. A comparison of sustainability theory with UK and European airports policy and practice. J. Environ. Manag. 2001, 63, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santoli, L.; Mancini, F.; Nastasi, B.; Piergrossi, V. Building integrated bioenergy production—Economic sustainability analysis of Bari airport combined heat and power upgrade fueled with bioenergy from short chain. Renew. Energy 2015, 81, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (AENA). Santander Airport Statistics. Available online: http://www.aena.es/csee/Satellite?pagename=Estadisticas/Home (accessed on 5 June 2016).
- ENAIRE. Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP). Available online: http://www.enaire.es/csee/Satellite/navegacion-aerea/es/Page/1078418725163/?other=1083158950596#ancla3 (accessed on 5 June 2016).
- Asociación Española de Meteorología (AEMET). Santander Meterological Data 1987–2010. Available online: http://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos?k=can (accessed on 5 June 2016).
Area | Type of Data | Data |
---|---|---|
Administration | Name | Airport Seve Ballesteros-Santander |
Code | LEXJ | |
Geographic | Adress | Airport Road, Maliaño, 39600, Spain |
Latitude | 43°25′37′′ N | |
Longitude | 03°49′12′′ W | |
Elevation | 5 m/16 ft | |
Air Operations | Schedule | 07:30 a.m.–11:00 p.m. LT |
Passenger Services | Hotels | No |
Restaurants | Yes | |
Medical service | No | |
Bank office | No | |
Post office | No | |
Transport | Bus, Taxi and rent-a-car | |
Post office | No | |
Tourism office | Yes |
Type of Building or Area | Denomination | Surface | Schedule |
---|---|---|---|
Terminal Building | 1 Terminal Building | 17,112 m2 | 06:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Control Tower | 1 Control Tower | 728 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 1 Firefighting Building | 730 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 1 Cargo Terminal | 636 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 2 Helicopter Hangers | 1700 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 3 Radio Navigation Systems Building | 530 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 1 Power Station Building | 630 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Auxiliary Building | 1 Fuel Storage Building | 625 m2 | 07:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Landside Urbanization | 1 Parking and airport urbanization | 86,900 m2 | 06:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m |
Aircraft Movement Area (Airside) | 1 Aircraft Apron (78,000 m2) 3 Taxiway (33,580 m2) 1 Runway (104,400 m2) | 215,980 m2 | 07:30 a.m.–11:00 p.m |
Typology of Companies Located at Airport | Number of Companies | Location |
---|---|---|
Airport Operator | 1 | Entire Airport |
Air Navigation Operator | 1 | Control Tower |
Shopping | 3 | Terminal Building |
Rent-a-Car | 4 | Terminal Building |
Restaurants and Coffee Bars | 2 | Terminal Building |
General Aviation | 3 | Aircraft Movement Area |
Commercial Aviation | 4 | Aircraft Movement Area |
Tourism | 1 | Terminal Building |
Security | 1 | Terminal Building |
Services | 2 | Terminal Building |
Government agencies | 3 | Entire Airport |
Fuel storage and distribution | 1 | Fuel Storage Area |
Example Charge Characteristics | Charge 1 | Charge 2 | Charge 3 |
Electric Charge Name | Street Lamps | CCTV Camera | Runway center-line lights |
Facility Associated | Lighting | Security | Airfield Lighting |
Typology of Charge | Opening | Fixed | Variable |
Number of Equal Elements | 43 | 1 | 154 |
Company | AENA | AENA | AENA |
Location | Parking (Landside) | Hangers | Runway (Airside) |
Electric Power | 0.25 kW | 0.09 kW | 0.096 kW |
Stand-by Power | - | - | - |
Total Electric Power | 10.75 kW | 0.09 kW | 14.78 kW |
Operation Hours | 7.5 | 24/7 | Under ATC demand |
Number of Days | 365 | 365 | 365 |
Estimated Energy Consumption | 29,428 kWh | 789 kWh | 52,073 kWh |
Example Charge Characteristics | Charge 4 | Charge 5 | Charge 6 |
Electric Charge Name | Escalator | ILS | Flight Information Monitor |
Facility Associated | Electromechanical | Radio Navigation | Signaling and Information |
Typology of Charge | Variable | Fixed | Opening |
Number of Equal Elements | 1 | 1 | 10 |
Company | AENA | AENA | AENA |
Location | Departures Hall—Terminal | Radio Navigation Building | Checking-in area—Terminal |
Electric Power | 9 kW | 0.97 kW | 0.170 kW |
Stand-by Power | 0.020 kW | 0 | 0.005 |
Total Electric Power | 9 kW | 0.97 | 1.7 |
Operation Hours | 3 | 24/7 | 18 |
Number of Days | 365 | 365 | 365 |
Estimated Energy Consumption | 10,008 kWh | 7884 kWh | 11,278 kWh |
Example Charge Characteristics | Charge 7 | Charge 8 | Charge 9 |
Electric Charge Name | Oven | Router | Computer |
Facility Associated | Equipment various | ICT | ICT |
Typology of Charge | Variable | Fixed | Opening |
Number of Equal Elements | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Company | Restaurant | Rent-a-Car 1 | Air Company 1 |
Location | Cafeteria—Terminal | Arrivals—Terminal | Check-in—Terminal |
Electric Power | 4 kW | 0.1 kW | 0.110 kW |
Stand-by Power | 0 | 0 | 0.010 kW |
Total Electric Power | 4 kW | 0.1 kW | 0.220 kW |
Operation Hours | 4 | 24/7 | 8 |
Number of Days | 365 | 365 | 365 |
Estimated Energy Consumption | 5840 kWh | 876 kWh | 642 kWh |
Zone | Building or Area | Number of Charges | Electric Power (kW) | Main Facilities | External Influences |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landside | Terminal Building | 6830 (68.92%) | 1286 (75.50%) | HVAC | Temperature Terminal Schedule Employees Passengers |
Lighting | Daylighting Terminal Schedule Employees/Passengers | ||||
Data Center Processing | Continuous operation | ||||
ICT | Terminal Schedule Employees | ||||
Signaling and Information | Terminal Schedule | ||||
Electromechanical | Passengers | ||||
Security | Continuous operation | ||||
Other equipment | Terminal Schedule Employees/Passengers | ||||
Airside | Parking and Urbanization | 770 (7.77%) | 47.73 (2,80%) | Lighting | Terminal Schedule Daylighting |
Aircraft Movement Area | 1048 (10.58%) | 113.55 (6.66%) | Airfield Lighting | Airport Schedule Air Operations Daylighting | |
Radio Navigation Systems Buildings | 88 (0.89%) | 13.37 (0.78%) | Radio Navigation Meteorological HVAC | Continuous operation | |
Control Tower | 299 (3.02%) | 49.5 (2.90%) | Radio Navigation | Continuous operation | |
HVAC | Temperature Building Schedule | ||||
Lighting | Daylighting Building Schedule Employees | ||||
ICT | Building Schedule Employees | ||||
Other equipment | Building Schedule Employees | ||||
Auxiliary Buildings | 875 (8.83%) | 193.54 (11.3%) | Lighting | Daylighting Building Schedule Employees | |
HVAC | Temperature Building Schedule Employees | ||||
Other equipment | Building Schedule | ||||
Total | Airport | 9910 | 1704 | - | - |
Measurement Equipment | Location | Number of Equipment |
---|---|---|
Equipment: Electricity meters Model: Schneider Power Meter Series 700 Location: Electric Panelboards of Buildings Data: Energy consumption (kWh) Frequency: Monthly | Terminal Building | 1 |
Parking | 2 | |
Urbanization | 1 | |
Control Tower | 1 | |
Cargo Terminal | 1 | |
Helicopter Hangers | 2 | |
Firefighting Building | 1 | |
Radio Navigation Buildings | 4 | |
Power Station Building | 1 | |
External Companies | 20 | |
Equipment: Electricity meters Model: Schneider Power Meter Series 700 Location: Electrical Panelboards of Facilities Data: Energy consumption (kWh) Frequency: Monthly | Airfield Lighting | 3 |
HVAC Terminal Building | 1 | |
Signaling and public information | 3 | |
Data Center Processing | 1 | |
Security Systems | 3 | |
Electromechanical | 1 | |
Lighting systems | 5 | |
Meteorological Systems | 2 | |
Equipment: Power analyzer Model: Chauvin Arnoux CA 8332B Location: Electrical Panelboards Data: Power consumption (kW) Frequency: 15 min | General Airport | 1 |
Terminal Building | 1 | |
HVAC Terminal Building | 1 |
Building | Annual Energy Consumption (kWh) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Terminal Building | 2,230,768 | 76.01% |
Parking and Urbanization | 130,516 | 4.45% |
Aircraft Movement Area | 236,078 | 8.04% |
Radio Navigation Systems Buildings | 45,292 | 1.57% |
Control Tower | 102,030 | 3.48% |
Power Station Building | 53,488 | 1.82% |
Helicopter Hangers | 29,720 | 1.01% |
Firefighting Building | 39,147 | 1.33% |
Cargo Terminal | 1180 | 0.04% |
Fuel Storage Building | 7743 | 0.26% |
Other Auxiliary Buildings | 58,387 | 1.99% |
Total | 2,935,000 | 100% |
Month | Terminal (kWh) (without HVAC) | HVAC Terminal (kWh) | Aircraft Movement Area (kWh) | Urbanization (kWh) | Other Buildings or Areas (kWh) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
January | 126,352 | 92,220 | 20,040 | 15,777 | 27,231 |
February | 120,249 | 93,050 | 20,614 | 12,387 | 27,804 |
March | 125,268 | 69,665 | 20,338 | 10,813 | 26,916 |
April | 118,318 | 28,437 | 18,383 | 8289 | 19,573 |
May | 123,328 | 38,340 | 21,553 | 7130 | 17,421 |
June | 119,845 | 72,593 | 19,025 | 5684 | 17,022 |
July | 128,615 | 97,430 | 20,300 | 6666 | 33,538 |
August | 128,049 | 99,500 | 18,281 | 8021 | 28,357 |
September | 125,638 | 31,195 | 19,243 | 10,479 | 23,445 |
October | 130,691 | 27,000 | 20,525 | 13,765 | 18,749 |
November | 126,865 | 57,320 | 19,415 | 15,537 | 26,127 |
December | 128,749 | 63,252 | 18,361 | 15,969 | 27,671 |
Total | 1,460,767 | 770,000 | 236,078 | 130,516 | 293,855 |
Facility | Annual Energy Consumption (kWh) | Type of Charge | Number of Charges | Electric Power (kW) |
---|---|---|---|---|
HVAC | 897,746 (30.58%) | Opening/Variable | 318 (3.21%) | 775.08 (45,48%) |
Lighting | 572,498 (19,51%) | Opening/Variable | 7120 (71.8%) | 249.01 (14.61%) |
Airfield Lighting | 238,301 (8.12%) | Variable | 1060 (10.7%) | 113.13 (6.64%) |
Data Center Processing | 299,636 (10.20%) | Fixed | 48 (0.48%) | 72.13 (4.23%) |
ICT | 105,650 (3.60%) | Opening/Fixed | 306 (3.09%) | 36.80 (2.16%) |
Signaling and Information | 171,881 (5.86%) | Opening/Fixed | 236 (2.38%) | 25.73 (1.51%) |
Electromechanical | 155,121 (5.29%) | Variable | 108 (1.09%) | 160.20 (9.40%) |
Security | 110,522 (3.76%) | Fixed | 364 (3.67%) | 36.31 (2.13%) |
Radio Navigation | 85,673 (2.91%) | Fixed | 21 (0.21%) | 9.78 (0.57%) |
Equipment various | 292,535 (9.96%) | Opening/Variable | 327 (3.30%) | 225.46 (13.23%) |
Meteorological | 6132 (0.21%) | Fixed | 2 (0.09%) | 0.7 (0.04%) |
Total | 2,935,000 | - | 9910 | 1704 |
Hour | Average Outside Temperature | Average Terminal Temperature (*) |
---|---|---|
00:00 a.m. | 5.5 °C | 20.1 °C |
06:00 a.m. | 5.9 °C | 17.4 °C |
09:00 a.m. | 7.0 °C | 21.2 °C |
12:00 a.m. | 9.2 °C | 20.9 °C |
03:00 p.m. | 10.0 °C | 21.1 °C |
06:00 p.m. | 8.0 °C | 21.1 °C |
09:00 p.m. | 4.7 °C | 20.8 °C |
Flight | Hour | Type |
---|---|---|
1 | 7:30 a.m. | Arrival |
2 | 7:35 a.m. | Departure |
3 | 8:00 a.m. | Departure |
4 | 10:45 a.m. | Arrival |
5 | 11:15 a.m. | Departure |
6 | 12:15 p.m. | Arrival |
7 | 12:45 p.m. | Departure |
8 | 02:30 p.m. | Arrival |
9 | 02:45 p.m. | Arrival |
10 | 03:00 p.m. | Departure |
11 | 04:15 p.m. | Departure |
12 | 04:30 p.m. | Arrival |
13 | 05:00 p.m. | Departure |
14 | 07:30 p.m. | Arrival |
15 | 08:00 p.m. | Departure |
16 | 10:45 p.m. | Arrival |
© 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ortega Alba, S.; Manana, M. Characterization and Analysis of Energy Demand Patterns in Airports. Energies 2017, 10, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010119
Ortega Alba S, Manana M. Characterization and Analysis of Energy Demand Patterns in Airports. Energies. 2017; 10(1):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010119
Chicago/Turabian StyleOrtega Alba, Sergio, and Mario Manana. 2017. "Characterization and Analysis of Energy Demand Patterns in Airports" Energies 10, no. 1: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010119
APA StyleOrtega Alba, S., & Manana, M. (2017). Characterization and Analysis of Energy Demand Patterns in Airports. Energies, 10(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010119