Next Article in Journal
Development of a Model for Performance Analysis of a Honeycomb Thermal Energy Storage for Solar Power Microturbine Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Radioactive Effluent Releases from Pressurized Water Reactors after Permanent Shutdown
Previous Article in Journal
Optimising Convolutional Neural Networks to Predict the Hygrothermal Performance of Building Components
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Colorimetric Method for Detection of Hydrazine Decomposition in Chemical Decontamination Process

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2
Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Daejeon 34057, Korea
3
Quantum Energy Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Korea
4
Advanced Radiation Technology Institute (ARTI), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Jeongeup 56212, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(20), 3967; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203967
Submission received: 11 September 2019 / Revised: 8 October 2019 / Accepted: 18 October 2019 / Published: 18 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nulcear Energy and Technology)

Abstract

:
The aim of nuclear facility decommissioning is to make local settlements safe, sustainable and professedly acceptable. The challenges are the clean-up of the nuclear site and waste management. This means a definite promise in terms of safety and security, taking into account social and environmental accountability. There is an essential need to develop safe and efficient methods for nuclear decommissioning. Thus, chemical decontamination technology is of great significance to the decommissioning of nuclear energy facilities. In particular, chemical decontamination technology is applicable to the pipelines and internal loop. The iron-rich oxides, such as Fe3O4 or NiOFe2O3, of a nuclear power plant should have sound decontamination follow-through and should put through a very small amount of secondary waste. It is important to be able to detect and quantify hydrazine in decontamination situations with high sensitivity and selectivity. A colorimetric assay is a technique used to determine the concentration of colored compounds in a solution. However, detecting targeted species rapidly and easily, and with high sensitivity and specificity, is still challenging. Here, the catalytic reaction of oxidants in the p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and hydrazine reaction is elucidated. Oxidants can catalyze the reaction of hydrazine and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde to form an azine complex such as p-dimethylaminobenzaldazine, with high selectivity and sensitivity within 30 min at ambient temperatures. In the absence of an oxidant such as iron or hydrogen peroxide no detectable colorimetric change was observed by the reaction of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and hydrazine unless an external oxidant was present in the system. In this study, we demonstrated a colorimetric method for the sensitive detection of hydrazine decomposition in the chemical decontamination process. Furthermore, the colorimetric response was easy to monitor with the unaided eye, without any sophisticated instrumentation. This method is thus suitable for on-site detection of contamination in a nuclear facility. In addition, this colorimetric method is convenient, non-invasive, free of complex equipment, and low-cost, making it possible to analyze hydrazine in industrial nuclear facilities. The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of hydrazine decomposition in the nuclear decontamination process.

1. Introduction

Nuclear science and technology play a pivotal role in bringing innovation, safety, and efficiency to industrial processes. Nuclear advances responding to global energy and environmental needs have contributed to the peaceful and sustainable development of the world. Today, there are 435 nuclear reactors in operation around the world [1]. A number of nuclear reactors are operated within well-established nuclear countries with their own supply networks. With the rapid phasing out of fossil fuels, and climate change concerns, many countries are planning to expand existing nuclear power programs, meaning that their resources may be extended. Furthermore, 31 entrant countries are actively preparing for the establishment of a nuclear energy program, with six planning to commission by 2020 and half by 2030 [2]. The domestic and global demand for nuclear decommissioning processes will significantly enhance in this phase, as directly operating nuclear reactors are brought off-line after their life spans end [3].
Decontamination is defined as the removal of contamination from surfaces of facilities or equipment via cleaning out, heating, chemical or electrochemical methods, mechanical cleaning, or other techniques. Among them, chemical decontamination is one of the important technologies applied during the decommissioning and post-operational clean-out process of industrial nuclear facilities. This ensures the safety of the laborers and reduces or minimizes the quantity of radioactive waste. Chemical decontamination in nuclear facilities removes iron-rich oxides and radionuclides on the surface of contaminated metals. In addition, decontamination for nuclear facilities that are being decommissioned requires the removal of thickened corroded surfaces using more effective agents or specially designed equipment. The goals of decontamination are, first, to reduce the magnitude of the residual radioactive sources in the reactor, pipes, and vessels and, second, to restore and reuse the equipment and nuclear materials to reduce the volume of radioactive waste. Most importantly, it is necessary to remove iron-rich oxides, such as Fe3O4 or NiOFe2O3, that are liable to trap contaminants on the inner surfaces of piping, as well as in thin layers of the structural material. Chemical decontamination technology is applicable to the pipelines and internal loops of the nuclear facilities; it should have acceptable decontamination efficiency with a low amount of secondary waste. To obtain sound decontamination, a concentrated chemical solution is generally used. However, this produces a large volume of secondary waste. A dilute solution of organic ligands such as Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) has a positive effect on decontamination. The decontamination solution, however, is not easily decomposed by the conventional oxidation approach.
The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide and the simultaneous oxidation of hydrazine were investigated by Graham [4]. Hydrazine and its derivatives are used extensively in many fields as chemicals, in agriculture, pesticides, insecticides, blowing agents for pharmaceuticals, plastic, photographic chemicals, textiles dyes, treatment of water for corrosion inhibitions, jets and rocket fuels, missile system, catalysts, emulsifiers, explosives, and reducing agents [5,6,7]. Thus, there has been increasing demand for a highly sensitive method of determination of hydrazine in applications such as water treatment, industrial practices, and environmental materials. In particular, hydrazine is used as a scavenger for dissolved oxygen in boilers. It is used widely for chemical pre-treatment in high-pressure boilers. The reducing properties of hydrazine enable its wide application in energetics and metallurgy as a corrosion inhibitor and for reducing metal ions. It is also able to make a protective magnetite coating as an effect of its reaction with surface rust or iron. Individuals may be professionally exposed to hydrazine at work or by accidental discharges into water, soil and air, which may happen during handling, transport, or storage, or due to improper waste disposal. The hydrazine in this system is an important reducer and reagent for the determination of successful decontamination in nuclear facilities. Many analytical methods to detect hydrazine have been reported in the literature, such as spectrophotometric [8,9,10], optical [11], potentiometric [12], spectrophotometric flow injection [13], fluorimetric [14,15], and chemiluminescence [16,17], as well as the measurement of gases [18]. Of these techniques, the colorimetric method is considered a simple, rapid and effective method for the detection of hydrazine at low concentrations. Rapid and convenient technologies for the identification of physical and analytical chemistry are of great significance in the environmental monitoring, multidisciplinary science, technology and engineering fields [19].
In this study, we successfully demonstrated a simple and rapid colorimetric method for the sensitive detection of hydrazine decomposition for a chemical decontamination process. Furthermore, the colorimetric response was easy to monitor with the unaided eye, without any sophisticated instrumentation. This assay is therefore suitable for the on-site detection for adaptation in successful chemical decontamination. It is applicable to the pipelines and internal loops of nuclear facilities and should produce sound decontamination in the field. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first report to successfully demonstrate chemical decontamination technology applicable to pipelines and internal loops, with iron-rich oxides, of a nuclear power plant using a colorimetric response that is easy to monitor without any sophisticated instrumentation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Spectrometric Assay

All reagents were of analytical grade and prepared using high-purity water. The composition of hydrazine was analyzed by a p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (4 × 10−6 M) method from HydraVer 2 Reagent (HACH Co. Ltd. (Loveland, Colorado, United States)). The Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-VIS) spectra were measured on a model UV-2600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Equipment, Tokyo, Japan). The colorimetric spectra of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and hydrazine were obtained using a model UV-2600 Shimadzu spectrometer), and 1.0 cm plastic cells were used in this study.

2.2. Characterization and Colorimetric Analysis

To analyze the samples prepared, they were photographed with a mobile phone camera in high dynamic range mode using the default settings. The mobile phone camera was fixed on a stand to stabilize the photos of the samples. Then, each photograph of the prepared samples was saved in JEPG format. Numerical color values of the colorimetric images were extracted from areas of each sample in the resulting image using ImageJ software [20]. The ΔR, ΔG, and ΔB values were calculated from the RGB values before and after and were analyzed for the histogram plot.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Decontamination Process in a Nuclear Power Plant and a Colorimetric Method for Hydrazine Detection

Many efforts have been made to understand the chemical decontamination using technology during the decommissioning and decontamination processes at nuclear facilities. A new concept in nuclear systems is the development of a chemical decontamination process without organic chelating reagents to decontaminate the reactor coolant system, loop, and pipelines with iron-rich oxides in nuclear facilities. Our group developed an effective in-situ system for chemical decontamination in which so-called hydrazine-based reductive metal ion decontamination was capable of dissolving metal oxides by protonation, surface complexation, or reduction. A solution containing hydrazine and an inorganic acid such as sulfuric acid made it possible for hydrogen to break the bonds between iron and oxygen via protonation, providing electrons for the reduction of insoluble ferric ions to soluble ferrous ions in an acidic condition [21].
Currently, a hydrazine-based reductive metal ion decontamination process is being developed to demonstrate its decontamination performance and applicability to the corrosion occurring in the nuclear reactor coolant system and steam generators with iron-rich forms, which is one of the major problems faced in nuclear facilities. Traditionally, these processes were minimized by keeping metal surfaces clean by chemical removal using an acceptable scavenger such as hydrazine. Hydrazine decomposition using hydrogen peroxide will subsequently be triggered to produce nitrogen and water, responding to the volume reduction of secondary waste. Here, ferrous and ferric ion from iron-rich oxides in the pipelines and internal loop will enhance the hydrazine decomposition as oxidants of catalysts. The reaction between hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide is given by Equation (1).
N2H4 (l) + 2H2O2 (l) → N2 (g) + 4H2O (l)
We elucidate a total schematic diagram for a colorimetric assay for the detection of hydrazine decomposition of internal surfaces with an oxidation of vessels or pipelines in a nuclear power plant in Figure 1.

3.2. Hydrazine

Hydrazine is an inorganic chemical reagent with the formula N2H4. There is a colorless liquid in which each H2N–N subunit is pyramidal in shape. The N–N and N–H distances are 1.45 Å (144.9 pm) and 1.02 Å (102.1 pm), respectively. However, hydrazine has a relatively high toxicity and is dangerously unstable. For this reason, it is usually managed while in a solution, for safety. Table 1 presents the properties and chemical structure of hydrazine. Hydrazine is widely used as a polymer foaming agent, including as a precursor to polymerization in pharmaceuticals and catalysts [22,23]. Hydrazine is used in processes including the production of spandex fibers, photographic developers, semiconductor manufacturing, and heat stabilizers. It is also widely used as an oxygen scavenger and corrosion protection in boiler water systems [24]. Lately, hydrazine has been widely used to dissolve materials for solar cell applications [25,26].

3.3. Effect of H2O2 Doses and Kinetics

As shown in Figure 2, the decomposition of hydrazine caused by H2O2 was found to be significantly dependent on the H2O2 concentration manners. As the initial H2O2 concentration increased, the intensity of absorbance at 455 nm was reduced significantly due to increased amounts of hydroxyl radicals. For 0.025 M of hydrazine, the decrease in absorbance at 455 nm reached a maximum upon the addition of 0.8 M H2O2. The impact of the initial concentration of H2O2 on color change kinetics was investigated. As shown in the insert in Figure 2, the dependence on H2O2 concentration was shown to be first order for low concentrations with a correlation coefficient up to 0.9664.

3.4. Colorimetric Method and Fenton/Fenton-Like Reaction

To understand the photo-physical properties, the color change of the azine complex aqueous chemo-indicator for the measurement of ferrous ions for hydrazine decomposition was investigated, as shown in Figure 3A,B. In the presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+, the color changed from yellow to dark orange with increasing Fe2+ or Fe3+ concentrations, which could be monitored by the unaided eye within 30 min and finally changed to dark brown. A colorimetric sensor for hydrazine with high sensitivity to p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde within 30 min at ambient temperature is presented.
Notably, the decomposition of hydrazine using Fenton (Fe2+/H2O2) and Fenton-like (Fe3+/H2O2) reactions is demonstrated in Equations (2)–(8). The Fenton reaction uses ferrous ions to react to hydrogen peroxide, triggering hydroxyl radicals with dominant oxidizing capabilities to decompose hydrazine, as shown in Equations (2)–(9). Here, R represents N2H4.
H2O2 + Fe2+ → OH∙+ OH + Fe3+
OH∙+ RH → R∙+ H2O
R + Fe3+ → R+ + Fe2+
Fe2+ + OH∙→ Fe3+ + OH
During the reaction in this system, ferric ions were formed, which could be reacted to make ferrous ions. The reaction of hydrogen peroxide with ferric ions was referred to as a Fenton-like reaction, as shown in Equations (6)–(9).
Fe3+ + H2O2 → Fe∙OOH2+ + H+
Fe∙OOH2+ → HO2∙+ Fe2+
H2O2 + Fe2+ → OH + OH + Fe3+
OH + RH → R∙+ H2O
Both Fenton and Fenton-like reactions should be effective, little work has been done on the Fenton-like reaction of hydrazine decomposition. This study suggested that the pipelines and internal loops of the Fenton/Fenton-like reaction for a colorimetric method could be used for the detection of hydrazine decomposition for chemical decontamination process with surface iron and rust in nuclear facilities.
The proposed method is based on yellow color change by the reaction of hydrazine with p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde to form an azine complex such as p-dimethylaminobenzaldazine with high selectivity and sensitivity. The yellow colored complex formed was stable and had a maximum absorption at 455 nm, which was detected by a UV-VIS detector with 1 cm optical path length. The presence of hydrogen peroxide and metal ions in the hydrazine solution did not interfere with the analysis (Figure 4).

3.5. A Colorimetric Assay for Hydrazine Decomposition

The influence of different metal ions, such as Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Cr6+, and Ni2+, on the degree of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 was elucidated. As shown in Figure 5A, the decomposition of hydrazine was relatively high at Fe2+ or Fe3+, while Mn2+, Cr6+, and Ni2+ were not changed compared to the control. It was important that the selective color change from dark orange to brown, induced by Fe2+ or Fe3+ sample solutions, be easily discernible by the unaided eye. Notably, no significant color change was observed upon the addition of cations other than Fe2+ or Fe3+. The presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+ could be readily distinguished by the unaided eye, as shown in Figure 5B. These results indicated that the degree of hydrazine decomposition had a better relationship with Fe2+ or Fe3+ than other metal ions. As shown in Figure 5C, each RGB value was measured at specific sample area and the corresponding digital image, using ImageJ software, was averaged to get the mean values in plot histograms. In addition, the values of the digital images were colorimetrically separated and converted into red (R), green (G), and blue (B). The RGB values formed a three-dimensional vector (ΔR, ΔG, and ΔB) and were analyzed from the RGB values before and after activity with different metal ions. Most importantly, the blue value (B) was unchanged in the presence of the Fe2+ or Fe3+ ion. However, the samples with Fe2+ or Fe3+ showed significant changes in terms of decreased values in red (R) and green (G) compared to the control. This result suggests that on-site detection and determination using a colorimetric assay can be easily confirmed by the unaided eye, even when Fe2+ or Fe3+, such as in case of magnetite, exists in unknown conditions.
As shown in Figure 6A and Figure 7A, the decomposition of hydrazine was relatively high at concentrations of 32 ppm, compared to 2 ppm, in the presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+. This suggests that hydrazine decomposition could be triggered by hydroxyl radicals generated in the presence of both Fe2+ or Fe3+ and H2O2. As shown in Figure 6B and Figure 7B, the color changes of the samples in the presence of different Fe2+ or Fe3+ concentrations were investigated using RGB values. The red (R) and green (G) significantly increased in concentration-dependent manners in the presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+, while the blue (B) value was nearly unchanged compared to the control. Therefore we propose that a colorimetric assay for detection of hydrazine decomposition for a chemical decontamination process would be convenient and efficient for Fe2+ or Fe3+ detection. The time-sequential results of color change in the presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+ are presented in Figures S1 and S2. In the presence of Fe2+ or Fe3+, the color changed from yellow to dark orange with increasing Fe2+ or Fe3+ concentration, which could be analyzed by the unaided eye within 30 min and before finally changing to dark brown. The reaction at 32 ppm of Fe2+ or Fe3+ concentration was faster than at 2 ppm.

4. Conclusions

We successfully developed a simple and rapid colorimetric method for the detection of hydrazine decomposition in chemical decontamination processes, applicable to the pipelines and internal loops in a nuclear power plant. Color changes were easily observed with the unaided eye when hydrazine was present in the decontamination process. This was directly related to the hydrazine concentration. We demonstrated that the hydrazine in this system is an important reducer and reagent for the determination of decontamination in a nuclear facility. Spectrophotometry evaluation of successful decontamination in a nuclear facility was one of the first analytical methods that enabled the determination of hydrazine decomposition. This method is an important tool due to its speed, availability, low-cost equipment, and simplicity—the analysis did not require highly-skilled manpower. The reaction between hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide was developed as a p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde chemodosimetric system for the highly selective detection of iron-rich oxides such as Fe3O4 or NiOFe2O3 in the primary coolant system of a nuclear power plant. The spectral analysis gave rise to a solution color change from yellow to brown, which was visible to the unaided eye. In particular, the method presented here was simple and convenient, as well as being environmentally friendly and providing a very effective strategy for the assay of iron-rich oxide forms by using ‘off the shelf’ reagents. Note that the proposed p-dimethylaminobenzaldazine with a colorimetric assay revealed enhanced on-site and real-time determination performance compared to conventional methods. First, visual sensitivity was high as the unaided eye was the limit of detection of hydrazine decomposition; second, there was a reasonably rapid response time (<30 min); and, third, there was strong selectivity without any interference of other metal ions. We believe that the suggested strategy is a very simple, convenient, and fast method for the detection of hydrazine decomposition, and is a potential candidate for practical applications such as on-site investigation and real-time monitoring. Eventually, a colorimetric method will be able to demonstrate decontamination performance and applicability in actual in-situ system decontamination. This proposed colorimetric method paves the way for realizing effective decontamination performance for decommissioning nuclear facilities.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3967/s1, Figure S1: Time sequential images of color change in the presence of Fe2+; Figure S2: Time sequential images of color change in the presence of Fe3+.

Author Contributions

J.P. and C.R. conceived and designed the experiment; J.P. and C.R. performed the experiments; H.-C.E. and S.K. suggested the idea for this work; C.R. and S.-J.P. analyzed the experimental data; all authors wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was mainly supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea for the award of a grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the Republic of Korea through the Nuclear Research and Development Program (NRF-2017M2A8A5015144).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WNA Reactor Database as of 1/1/13. Available online: http://world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html (accessed on 1 September 2019).
  2. World Nuclear Association (WNA). The World Nuclear Supply Chain: Outlook 2030; WNA: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moon, J.; Kim, S.; Choi, W.; Choi, B.; Chung, D.; Seo, B. The status and prospect of decommissioning technology development at KAERI. JNFCWT 2019, 17, 139–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Graham, D.P. Promoter action in reactions of oxidation concomitant with the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. 1,2 I. The oxidation of hydrazine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1930, 52, 3035–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karuppiah, C.; Palanisamy, S.; Chen, S.M.; Ramaraj, S.K.; Periakaruppan, P. A novel and sensitive amperometric hydrazine sensor based on gold nanoparticles decorated graphite nanosheets modified screen printed carbon electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 139, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Palanisamy, S.; Thirumalraj, B.; Chen, S.M. Electrochemical fabrication of gold nanoparticles decorated on activated fullerene C60: An enhanced sensing platform for trace level detection of toxic hydrazine in water samples. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 94591–94598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Devasenathipathy, R.; Palanisamy, S.; Chen, S.M.; Karuppiah, C.; Mani, V.; Ramaraj, S.K.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Hemaid, F.M. An amperometric biological toxic hydrazine sensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and iron tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine composite modified electrode. Electroanalysis 2015, 27, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ensafi, A.A.; Sadeghie, M.M.; Emamei, F. Kinetic reaction rate method for the determination of hydrazine with spectrophotometric detection. J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 54, 1024–1027. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abbaspour, A.; Mirahmadi, E.; Khajehzadeh, A. Disposable sensor for quantitative determination of hydrazine in water and biological sample. Anal. Methods 2010, 2, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Fang, M.; LaGasse, M.K.; Askim, J.R.; Suslick, K.S. Colorimetric recognition of aldehydes and ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 9860–9863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nelsen, S.F.; Ismagilov, R.F.; Powell, D.R. Effects of bridge redox state levels on the electron transfer and optical properties of intervalence compounds with hydrazine charge-bearing units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1924–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chiristova, R.; Ivanova, M.; Novkirishka, M. Indirect potentiometric determination of arsenite, sulphite, ascorbic acid, hydrazine and hydroxylamine with an iodide-selective electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 1976, 85, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ensafi, A.A.; Naderi, B. Flow-injection spectrophotometric determination of hydrazine. Microchem. J. 1997, 56, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Danielson, N.D.; Conroy, C.M. Fluorometric determination of hydrazine and ammonia separately or in mixtures. Talanta 1982, 29, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ensafi, A.; Rezaei, B. Flow injection determination of hydrazine with fluorimetric detection. Talanta 1998, 47, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Safavi, A.; Baezzat, M.R. Flow injection chemiluminescence determination of hydrazine. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 358, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Safavi, A.; Absalan, G.; Bamdad, F. Effect of gold nanoparticle as a novel nanocatalyst on luminol–hydrazine chemiluminescence system and its analytical application. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 610, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hassan, S.S.M. Microgasometric determination of the hydrazine function by oxidation with some inorganic oxidants in acidic media. Anal. Chim. Acta 1971, 54, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Housecroft, C.; Constable, E. Chemistry: An Introduction to Organic, Inorganic, and Physical Chemistry; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kang, S.M.; Jang, S.C.; Huh, Y.S.; Lee, C.S.; Roh, C. A highly facile and selective Chemo-Paper-Sensor (CPS) for detection of strontium. Chemosphere 2016, 152, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, S.; Park, S.; Choi, W.; Won, H.; Park, J.; Seo, B. Magnetite dissolution by copper catalyzed reductive decontamination. JNFCWT 2018, 16, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. CRC. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 83rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  23. Holleman, A.F.; Wieberg, E. Inorganic Chemistry; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schirmann, J.P.; Bourdauducq, P. Hydrazine in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, W.; Mitzi, D.B.; Yuan, M.; Kellock, A.J.; Chey, S.J.; Gunawan, O. 12% Efficiency CuIn(Se,S)2 photovoltaic device prepared using a hydrazine solution process. Chem. Mater. 2009, 22, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, W.W.; Bob, B.; Li, S.-H.; Yang, Y. Low-temperature processing of a solution-deposited CuInSSe thin-film solar cell. Thin Solid Film. 2009, 517, 6853–6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a colorimetric assay for detection of hydrazine decomposition of internal surfaces with an oxidation of vessels or pipelines in a nuclear power plant.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a colorimetric assay for detection of hydrazine decomposition of internal surfaces with an oxidation of vessels or pipelines in a nuclear power plant.
Energies 12 03967 g001
Figure 2. Effect of H2O2 concentrations on absorption at 455 nm for detection of hydrazine decomposition. The insert is a calibration graph of H2O2.
Figure 2. Effect of H2O2 concentrations on absorption at 455 nm for detection of hydrazine decomposition. The insert is a calibration graph of H2O2.
Energies 12 03967 g002
Figure 3. (A) Sequential time images of color change in the presence of Fe2+. The concentrations of hydrazine, H2O2, Fe2+, and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde are 0.025 M, 0.2 M, 32 ppm, and 4 × 10−6 M, respectively. (B) Sequential time images of color change in the presence of Fe3+. The concentration of hydrazine, H2O2, and Fe3+, and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde are 0.025 M, 0.2 M, 32 ppm, and 4 × 10−6 M, respectively.
Figure 3. (A) Sequential time images of color change in the presence of Fe2+. The concentrations of hydrazine, H2O2, Fe2+, and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde are 0.025 M, 0.2 M, 32 ppm, and 4 × 10−6 M, respectively. (B) Sequential time images of color change in the presence of Fe3+. The concentration of hydrazine, H2O2, and Fe3+, and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde are 0.025 M, 0.2 M, 32 ppm, and 4 × 10−6 M, respectively.
Energies 12 03967 g003
Figure 4. Proposed mechanism of hydrazine assay.
Figure 4. Proposed mechanism of hydrazine assay.
Energies 12 03967 g004
Figure 5. (A) Spectral responses for detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different metal ions (32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different metal ions; and (C) RGB profiles of different metal ions. 1 represents the control and 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represent Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Cr6+, and Ni2+. The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Figure 5. (A) Spectral responses for detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different metal ions (32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different metal ions; and (C) RGB profiles of different metal ions. 1 represents the control and 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represent Fe2+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Cr6+, and Ni2+. The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Energies 12 03967 g005
Figure 6. (A) Spectral responses for the detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (C) RGB profiles for different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively). 1 represents the control without H2O2 and 2, 3, and 4 represent with H2O2, with H2O2 and Fe2+ (2 ppm), and with H2O2 and Fe2+ (32 ppm). The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Figure 6. (A) Spectral responses for the detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (C) RGB profiles for different concentrations of Fe2+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively). 1 represents the control without H2O2 and 2, 3, and 4 represent with H2O2, with H2O2 and Fe2+ (2 ppm), and with H2O2 and Fe2+ (32 ppm). The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Energies 12 03967 g006
Figure 7. (A) Spectral responses for the detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (C) RGB profiles for different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively). 1 represents the control without H2O2 and 2, 3, and 4 represent with H2O2, with H2O2 and Fe3+ (2 ppm), and with H2O2 and Fe3+ (32 ppm). The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Figure 7. (A) Spectral responses for the detection of hydrazine decomposition in the presence of H2O2 (0.2 M) and different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (B) color changes for different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively); (C) RGB profiles for different concentrations of Fe3+ (2 and 32 ppm respectively). 1 represents the control without H2O2 and 2, 3, and 4 represent with H2O2, with H2O2 and Fe3+ (2 ppm), and with H2O2 and Fe3+ (32 ppm). The concentration of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde used was 4 × 10−6 M.
Energies 12 03967 g007
Table 1. Properties and chemical structure of hydrazine.
Table 1. Properties and chemical structure of hydrazine.
IUPAC NameHydrazine
Chemical structure Energies 12 03967 i001
Molecular formulaN2H4, N2H4·H2O
Molecular shapepyramidal at N
Molar mass (g/mol)32.05 (anhydrous)
50.06 (hydrate)
Density (g/cm3)1.004 (anhydrous)
1.032 (hydrate)
Melting point (°C)2 (anhydrous)
−51.5 (hydrate)
Boiling point (°C)113.5 (anhydrous)
120.1 (hydrate)
Viscosity (cP)0.876 at 25 °C
Vapor pressure (mmHG)14.19 at 25 °C
Surface tension (mN/m)66.7 at 25 °C (anhydrous)
74.2 at 25 °C (hydrate)
Vapor pressure (kPa)1.92 (anhydrous)
1.20 (hydrate)
Heat of formation (ΔHf) (kJ/mol)55.63 (anhydrous)
−242.9 (hydrate)
Dipole moment (C·m)6.1375 × 10−3
Dielectric constant51.7 at 25 °C
Acidity (pKa)7.98 at 25 °C
Solubility in waterSoluble

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.; Eun, H.-C.; Kim, S.; Roh, C.; Park, S.-J. Colorimetric Method for Detection of Hydrazine Decomposition in Chemical Decontamination Process. Energies 2019, 12, 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203967

AMA Style

Park J, Eun H-C, Kim S, Roh C, Park S-J. Colorimetric Method for Detection of Hydrazine Decomposition in Chemical Decontamination Process. Energies. 2019; 12(20):3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203967

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Jungsoon, Hee-Chul Eun, Seonbyeong Kim, Changhyun Roh, and So-Jin Park. 2019. "Colorimetric Method for Detection of Hydrazine Decomposition in Chemical Decontamination Process" Energies 12, no. 20: 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203967

APA Style

Park, J., Eun, H. -C., Kim, S., Roh, C., & Park, S. -J. (2019). Colorimetric Method for Detection of Hydrazine Decomposition in Chemical Decontamination Process. Energies, 12(20), 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203967

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop