Next Article in Journal
Techno-Economic Optimization Analysis of an Autonomous Photovoltaic Power System for a Shoreline Electrode Station of HVDC Link: Case Study of an Electrode Station on the Small Island of Stachtoroi for the Attica–Crete Interconnection
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Atmospheric Precipitation on Wastewater Volume Flowing into the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Nowy Targ (Poland) in Terms of Treatment Costs
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of MnAl Permanent Magnets with a Study on Their Potential in Electrical Machines
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Electrification in the Decarbonization of Central-Western Europe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

“Oil is the New Data”: Energy Technology Innovation in Digital Oil Fields

Science and Technology Policy Institute, Sejong National Research Complex 370, Sicheng-daero, Sejong 30147, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(21), 5547; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215547
Submission received: 11 August 2020 / Revised: 15 September 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 / Published: 23 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Transition and Environmental Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Digital oil fields (DOFs) are built on data produced from energy technology innovation during the application of new technologies to oil resource development. In this study, this conversion is examined through the paradigm switch to “oil is the new data”. An analysis of related patents shows that DOF technology is developing through convergence and close links with other industries, specifically the equipment, parts, and material industries. Additionally, it is conjectured that the strategic preemption of standards will emerge as an important policy issue because a standard must be established for the interoperability of the elemental technologies of DOFs. Furthermore, with the expansion of DOF-related technologies, device-related technologies have also been developed. Of these device-related technologies, sensor technology specifically provides new possibilities for the development of DOFs. The significance of this study is that it explains the evolution of DOFs over the course of 10 years, which is illustrative of technological innovation in the field of energy-related development and data collection.

1. Introduction

The expression, “data is the new oil” implies the considerable current economic value of big data in the digital era [1]. This indicates that data, like coal and oil used as raw material and fuels for industrial applications, may be used to develop other industries, creating new economic value. Recently, the oil exploration and production (oil E&P) industry has been generating, storing, and using vast amounts of data. The oil E&P industry has applied sensors throughout the entire oil production process to create data in real time, and uses artificial intelligence to analyze the collected data to make decisions efficiently. We describe the digital transformation of the oil E&P industry as the digital oil field (DOF). DOFs, which are preoccupied with value added data, have attracted significant attention recently with the introduction of new technologies. Since DOFs are oil fields that produce big data, we paraphrase the term “data is oil”, to state that “oil is the new data”. Furthermore, data have garnered attention as the crude oil of the 21st century [2]. To date, data have had a great impact worldwide, such that new economic drivers have been established owing to its applications throughout industry. Although the resource development industry has been dealing with vast amounts of material for a long time, the rapid development of computers, sensors, information and communication technologies (ICTs) in recent years has exponentially increased the amount of data being generated. Big data technologies can be used to analyze large amounts of unstructured data that hitherto could not be processed. As processing technologies, big data analysis methods are the basis for realizing intelligent services [3].
Recently, big data analysis has been utilized for innovation based on new DOF technology. DOF innovation is progressing rapidly because the combination of resource development and ICT can reduce the overall cost and increase profitability of the whole process. To develop a DOF, it is necessary to study the optimal search path by combining various data such as geographic information, field information, core data, and reservoir data. Therefore, related patents, which are being continuously monitored, have been filed in connection with these fields [4,5]. DOF technology primarily develops by adopting technologies from fields such as short-range and telecommunication infrastructure, cloud computing and integrated data management, digital sensor modules, and data analysis and visualization [6]. This is different from existing energy-related data conversion, which necessitates the periodic consideration of technology for comprehensive data collection. This study contributes toward finding ways to develop energy-related innovation capabilities through the analysis of DOF-related innovation capabilities.
Although the influence of oil in some areas in the world is diminishing due to the increasing deployment of renewable energy, oil remains important in the world economy. Recently, with production rates in traditional oil and gas fields reaching their peaks, or even depletion stages, exploration environments have become increasingly hostile owing to greater target depths, more extreme climates, or inaccessible locations. In the case of new petroleum resources such as shale gas, the required drilling per unit of leased area is typically higher than that of conventional petroleum resources, and so are the required work and management operations, such as in hydraulic crushing. DOF technology makes it possible to efficiently manage sites that require oil wells comprising several hundred to several thousand holes, such as those for shale gas, and to facilitate the unmanned or remote management of oil and gas development sites in extreme or remote locations. In addition, data generated in the oil production process are being leveraged to increase production and economic efficiency through risk prevention and demand forecasting. Therefore, this study aims to identify the implications of DOFs in the field of oil resource development using specific data. Various efforts have been made in the DOF-related hardware field to remotely monitor and control oil wells [7] by integrating ICT technologies such as data communication with servers and real time data processing. Research in this field is ongoing [8,9].
Several technological innovations have been designed recently in the field of oil exploration and production, through the adoption of new technologies [4]. DOFs are convergence technologies that manage and operate online [10,11]. New technologies that are adopted in the field include the extraction of limited petroleum resources. Examples of the extraction technology include extreme pole and gas hydrates, recovery/production by robots, AI-based exploration and evaluation technology, digital production optimization technology (DOF), and consumption prediction using big data [3,12]. This research reflects these new technologies based on data accumulated in the oil resource development field [13,14]. DOFs, in relation to petroleum resource development, have the potential to facilitate the creation of various business models through their roles as platforms for scaling and managing data. Dominant technology development companies in the petroleum field have a strong network in the value chain process, which makes it difficult for new startups to participate in this area. This is a real problem, as it is difficult for new companies to penetrate a niche market with well-established methods and strategies. As an opportunity for new companies to participate in the digital oil field, we make this field our focus. We believe that the results of this study can be used as reference material for future oil-related policies.
In this study, the structural characteristics of the innovation process in DOFs were investigated through the conversion of energy-related innovation capabilities focused on oil resource development stages. To this end, we analyzed changes in the innovation capabilities and structural characteristics of DOFs, which focus on using data to produce value addition. Previous studies on the digital oil field have focused on detailed element technology or business feasibility for specific cases [10,15,16,17,18], without discussions about the overall system perspective. In addition, there is little research that analyzes the contents of unstructured data using actual patent data in detailed technology. Furthermore, compared with the interest in the rapidly developing digital oil field owing to the grafting of new technologies, limited research has been conducted on case studies, and research on the structural characteristics related to technological innovations in this field is insufficient [10,17,19].
This study aims to solve major issues in technological innovation processes taking place in the digital oil field by using data on actual patent content. Specifically, by analyzing the innovation capabilities of DOFs, future research directions will be derived and proposed. The characteristics of the rapidly growing innovation capabilities of DOFs will be examined, and conclusions will be drawn. To overcome the limitations of existing research methods, we focused on innovative competency-related data (unstructured data in patents), and analyzed and derived structural implications through the analysis of structural characteristics over time.

2. Materials and Methods

The main activities of oil E&P are composed of exploration, reservoir characterization, development, and production, which collectively have the highest number of patents. We analyzed how DOF technologies evolved in the above mentioned areas. First, we focused on the development and production fields, which have the highest number of patents for E&P activities. We analyzed these patents using DOF-related methods. We collected and analyzed related data and derived future implications. During the study, relevant experts on patent-related search formulas were consulted (see Appendix A).
In oil E&P, securing core technologies is directly linked to profitability at each stage of the oil and gas field development; therefore, it is necessary to identify and continuously monitor core competencies. Despite the importance of these core competencies, they have so far hardly been organized and analyzed based on the number of patent applications and trends by country. In this study, we deployed a differentiated analysis method to overcome the limitations of existing research methods and to continuously monitor innovation capabilities in the field of oil resource development. For innovation capability analysis, we attempted to extract key content using patent document information such as unstructured and text data, and identify the key content and issues using cluster analysis and topic modeling.
Topic modeling is a machine learning technique that can extract the topics inherent in document data to classify documents or derive word clusters that constitute topics. The topic analysis modeling method extracts topics through the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) algorithm and visualizes the clustering of keywords and documents for each topic. The rationale for using the LDA algorithm in topic modeling is to discover the hidden semantic structure of the text body. In particular, LDA extracts topics by estimating the probabilities that a word exists in a specific subject and that a specific subject exists in a document as a combination probability [20]. This study uses scientific analysis tools to understand the knowledge-based network structure of the digital oil field, monitor the technological innovation process, and utilize the results of the analysis in policy development, supporting the entry of startups into the field.
The analysis steps (shown in Figure 1) are as described here.
First, the related literature was investigated to determine DOF research trends in the field of oil resource development.
Second, methods for collecting DOF-related data were designed in consultation with experts in the relevant fields, and a search formula for finding related patents was derived (Appendix A). Data from the last 9 years (2 June 2011~2 June 2020) were collected from the Korean Intellectual Property Office. A total of 15159 data points were collected. The Korean Intellectual Property Office database is a reliable site showing the current status of each country’s patents by linking up with the patent databases of other countries.
Third, the cluster network analysis method and topic modeling technique were used to examine the structural characteristics. Through these methods, major issues and contents were analyzed to draw their implications. Unstructured patent data were used for this analysis. The patent number and applicant data were omitted, and the patent description and unstructured data related to the title were collected, analyzed, and processed.
Fourth, to analyze the yearly change in innovation capacity, each keyword was extracted by dividing the data for the 9 years into three-year ranges, such as 2011~2014, 2015~2017, and 2018~2020.
Finally, conclusions were drawn based on the analysis of the contents, and future research tasks were proposed.
This study attempts to understand the structural characteristics of network formation by first determining the knowledge-based network structure occurring in the digital oil field, and then monitoring, in detail, the changes that occurred in the last 9 years. This is meaningful in monitoring the innovation capacity of the digital oil field, which has been rapidly changing in recent years. Additionally, this study is different from other studies in that it contains an abundant, unseen knowledge-based network structure that focuses on the contents of patent data and attempts to analyze it so as to overcome the limitations of analysis methods based on patent frequency alone.

3. Results

In this study, semantic network analysis was utilized to examine the structural characteristics of the innovative capabilities of DOFs. First, by analyzing the entirety of the 9-year data, we attempted to analyze critical keywords and issues in the related topics. To examine the temporal changes in technological innovation, the data were split into three time divisions.
The following results were obtained by analyzing the structural characteristics of DOFs (Table 1). To interpret the results by group (Figure 2), an analysis was attempted by referring to a study that distinguished existing DOFs [21,22], and explained the characteristics of their related technologies at each stage. This study was used to interpret the high-ranking keywords and main contents of each group among the classification groups, with reference to existing studies (see Table A1).
The most common keywords from the first group, denoted by G1, include “method”, “system”, “composition”, “material”, and “use”. This group represents the transmission role within the system in the DOF. It can be identified as the component serving as the communication infrastructure, which assembles, supports, and builds hardware-related technologies.
The second group, G2, mainly focuses on keywords such as “process”, “apparatus”, “control”, and other terms related to process modeling in the DOF that involve interpretation and control of the collected data. The group is closely related to automation, which is important for optimizing the overall work processes. Traditional technologies in the field of oil resource development are being utilized to support the overall system efficiency improvement of DOFs by combining AI and machine learning, which are nontraditional technologies, to support decision making [23,24]. It was also confirmed that these technologies are closely related to those used in the equipment industry in terms of remote monitoring and control.
Among the main technologies in a DOF, process control can be made redundant by improving the efficiency of the oil field using methods such as prediction and production optimization through automated data collection and alarm systems. The management life cycle is divided into data processing, analysis, and modeling. Specifically, this process is used to make decisions with data obtained from petroleum resource development [25,26].
The recently developed virtual field is a technology that can simulate the physical process by mathematically modeling a production network from oil and gas fields through a production line [27]. This is an important step, in which real time on-site data analysis, production optimization, and economic forecast analysis can be performed by incorporating risk factors into the simulation as well. Production optimization can be performed by applying each production classification; the optimization process utilizes additional drilling locations and plans at the field scale. Ultimately, this process can be integrated and used to predict oil price fluctuations or production volumes, thereby establishing an optimal management system for major oil fields [28].
A device with one or more sensors for monitoring the effectiveness of sand compaction on a production line. The sensor measures the changes in sand compaction, which is affected by the mechanics of the vibration system, changes in the sand properties, and environmental changes—from patent #13204677, 2011.8.6. Moha**-.
The third group, G3, includes keywords such as “device”, “treatment”, and “production”, and indicates major issues related to sensor and interface support. Device technologies include sensors and interfaces, and represent the processes of seismic exploration, 4D exploration, and monitoring, including remote sensing [29,30,31]. Processing and visualizing the obtained data can increase the efficiency of oil production by unifying complex data, such as geological and borehole data obtained from earthquake disasters, to increase the drilling and development efficiency.
G4, the last group, comprises major issues related to control hardware, such as the “plant”, “power”, “acid”, and “unit”. The major DOF companies characteristically develop technology mainly on the sea, where energy-related technology developments for plant management are being made. It has been confirmed that these companies are attempting to develop more efficient technology for situations where it is necessary to supply electricity to an offshore oil field.
A digital offshore plant field has also been analyzed. This field is used for discovering, drilling, and producing marine resources such as oil and gas, and is closely related to the DOF. Developments in this area can significantly reduce the cost of generating and producing marine resources in offshore plants by combining new technologies, such as ICT, with established ones [32,33].
In marine installations, a DOF is unmanned and remotely controlled. Owing to initial cost limitations, the technology for offshore oil fields tends to be developed mainly through collaboration with major companies that develop large-scale oil fields and major ICT companies. To disrupt the monopoly that major companies with experience in large-scale oil fields have, it is necessary to develop DOFs with differentiated strategies.
A method for recovering gas in natural gas hydrate exploitation is disclosed, in which a gas–water mixture at the bottom of an exploitation well is delivered to an ocean surface platform through a marine riser by adopting the gas-lift effect of methane gas derived from the dissociation of natural gas hydrate, thus achieving a controllable flow production of marine natural gas hydrate. #15765652 2018.2.12. G* institute-.
Technological innovations in DOFs have evolved. Initially, in early 2010, keywords such as “oilfield”, “gas system”, “process composition”, and “apparatus” ranked highly. A change was observed in the mid-2000s, and as the importance of devices that improved the process efficiency of DOFs increased, the ranking of keywords related to those devices also increased. In recent years, devices that are considered important in DOFs have been sensor, block chain, and predictive analytics technologies (Research and markets, 2018). Among these, sensor technology is central in data collection and processing, and plays an important role in the development of DOFs. To manage a large area, it is necessary to install a sensor, and collect and analyze its data; the economic feasibility of this can be determined based on the price of the sensor. As a matter of fact, sensor prices have been falling since 2010 ($0.66 per unit) and, at the time of writing, they have fallen to half their initial values [34]. It has been confirmed that DOFs are becoming more economically efficient owing to the drop in sensor prices and that the majority of the keywords are device-related issues. In the development of DOFs, sensors can collect different data and, by processing these data, increase the efficiency and predictability of the entire process, thus facilitating the development of a smarter oil field.
A completion system for use in a well includes a first completion section and a second section. The first completion section has a sand control assembly to prevent passage of particulates, a first inductive coupler portion, and a sensor positioned proximate to the sand control assembly, which is electrically coupled to the first inductive coupler portion—from patent #14586375, S* cooperation, 2014.12.30.-.
Data integration, which involves collecting data from each step, is a comprehensive process that covers data collection and processing. Optimization, which improves business efficiency, is performed by varying the judgment and manipulation method according to the collection of information in the upstream stage. Intelligent drilling and completion is a process that extracts underground information in real time during drilling. It helps drilling technicians remove obstacles and optimize operations such as bending. Specifically, it helps in optimizing the productivity of boreholes during drilling through means such as monitoring the temperature and pressure through a fluid sensor. It also prevents accidents by facilitating the early detection of hazards.
Next, changes in the knowledge-based network structure were examined by extracting the frequency of keywords over time (Figure 3), based on the keywords extracted from the network by group. The variation of the DOF over time is as presented here. First, when considering the contents of related patents, the keywords related to “system” and “process” are located at the root. This has remained the same for almost a decade and it can be confirmed that, in the development of the DOF, technological developments related to improving the efficiency of these systems and processes are being made. Additionally, it has been confirmed that DOFs, which manage the entire cycle, tend to be geared toward the development of technologies for overall optimization rather than the development of specific technologies.
In the development of DOF technology, “device” development is closely related to the sensor, communication base, decision support, remote operation, and control system fields. In the field of traditional petroleum resource development, which is mainly based on existing hardware device technology, it is possible to improve the economic efficiency of oil fields by adopting new ICT technology [35]. The core technology in this field is based on equipment components. Furthermore, hardware technology development is a field that has been developed in combination with AI and machine learning technologies that can support decision making [18].
The analysis results obtained from extracting the frequency of related keywords in the groups over time are detailed as follows.
The groups G1 (communications infrastructure), G3 (sensor and interface support), and G4 (control hardware) have become more important over time (Figure 4). The frequency of G2 (processing modeling), conversely, has reduced over time, indicating that the DOF has progressed beyond the initial stage of development, which requires overall process modeling. Furthermore, it can be observed that various technologies related to traditional oil resource development are evolving in combination with other innovative technologies as they undergo a scale-up process while being assimilated into the DOF. The technology related to G1 is advancing steadily, which suggests that the standards for maintaining interoperability by integrating different technologies are growing in importance over time.
Groups G1, G3, and G4 have become increasingly important over time by percentage distribution. However, as seen in Table 2, the occurrence frequency of G1 key terms decreased from 5211 (2011–2014) to 4344 (2018–2020); the occurrence frequency of G2 key terms decreased from 3591 to 2158. The frequency ratio gradually decreases for all groups, but the distribution shows a tendency to increase gradually for groups G1, G3, and G4. This shows a tendency to decrease in quantity but increase in actual overall distribution, which is meaningful in that it shows qualitative growth of core technologies rather than a quantitative increase.

4. Discussion

To develop a DOF, a strategic innovation transitioning from “data is the new oil” to “oil is the new data” is necessary. In the past, petroleum resource development involved oil production through the process of drilling, reservoir characterization, development, and the production of traditional oil. The oil industry, in particular, is characterized by the pervasive presence of cartels in the technology sector, as major corporations around the world dominate and lead technology development. Entering the petroleum sector, unlike other industries, requires high initial capital and experience. The availability of empirical data can reduce the opportunity cost and improve the economic efficiency of the DOF.
In DOFs, a technology that can increase the overall optimization efficiency is being primarily developed. In the petroleum field, petroleum technology developments so far can be mainly attributed to innovations in elemental technologies. However, the digital oil field is developing into a platform that enhances overall efficiency, focusing on the interoperability of element technologies [36]. Additionally, by using the data generated by the DOF platform, we are trying to realize not only the optimization of the entire system but also a reduction in management costs through the optimization management of the oil field. Therefore, in establishing policies related to DOFs, rather than focusing on specific technologies, it is necessary to focus on the overall system or control field and seek data-based support measures. In this field, the integration of different elementary technologies will emerge as an important issue in the future; technological innovation policy support is needed.
In the existing oil industry, the participation of venture companies and small and medium enterprise (SMEs) is restricted, owing to the monopoly of certain dominant companies. However, a situation where new technology is inevitable in the petroleum industry can provide a new opportunity for venture companies and SMEs with differentiated technologies to incorporate such new high-tech technologies into the market. Therefore, this study is meaningful in the sense that it offers a technological innovation direction for startups to enter into the oil industry, by providing the structural characteristics of the knowledge base of the digital oil field.
Digitalization of the oil resource development field is closely related to industrial development. Regardless of how good a technology is, if it does not yield industrial profits, it may be obliterated. Furthermore, technology in the field of petroleum resource development has developed under the monopoly of a few leading companies over the past few years; but there has hardly been any external technical impetus. A change in this aspect can provide an opportunity for the industrial revolution to shift to an oil-oriented development strategy centered on economics, especially against the backdrop of the surge in oil prices that occurred in the mid-2000s. A strategic approach is needed to shift the paradigm of energy-related technological development.
DOFs are being developed in tandem with various industries such as the parts, materials, equipment, and device industries; it goes beyond merely adopting ICT technology. Future studies could focus on confirming the development trend of DOFs in relation to the various industries in a development strategy focused on early productivity improvement methods.

5. Conclusions

In this study, using DOF-related patents, the technological innovations in DOFs, which have recently attracted significant attention in energy-related technology development, were analyzed. This study overcame the limitations of the existing patent analysis by focusing on the contents of the technology. Furthermore, research methodologies, such as the evolution of the technology field and cluster analysis through semantic network analysis, were utilized.
First, as can be seen in the DOF-related patent analysis, technological development is achieved through fusion with other industries, specifically the equipment, parts, and material industries. DOFs develop closely with the equipment, parts, and materials industries; they are not created by merely grafting new ICT into the traditional oil industry. It can be observed that developments are being made through innovations that go beyond simply monitoring the entire system; these developments do not involve merely deploying an ICT-based monitoring system in the existing oil resource development field. Therefore, to monitor the situation of oil and gas fields in real time and build an online management system by automating the entire process from exploration to production, it is necessary to go through the scale-up process of all related technologies and confirm that the overall technology optimization is taking place.
It is conjectured that the strategic preemption of the standard will emerge as an important policy task because standards must be established to ensure the interoperability of the elemental technologies in DOF technology optimization. In developing DOFs, it was confirmed that the main systems and processes are central to the interoperability of convergence technologies and closely related to standard preemption; technology development is being geared toward improving the efficiency of the component systems and processes of DOFs.
Several device-related technologies have also been developed. Among these device-related technologies, sensor technology provides new possibilities for the development of DOFs. This is because the development of sensor technology can lead to a qualitative growth in data collection and processing, as various data are produced and collected through sensors in DOFs. In terms of economics, the decline in the price of core devices plays an important role in the diffusion of DOFs.
Hardware technologies in the traditional oil resource development field are rapidly developing DOF devices, which is a deviation from traditional preoccupation, by combining AI and machine learning, data collection, and processing technologies. The core significance of this study is that it explains the evolution of DOF technology, which is illustrative of technological innovation in the field of energy-related data development and collection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C.; methodology, H.C.; validation, H.C.; formal analysis, H.C.; investigation, H.C.; data curation, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C. and H.P.; writing—review and editing, H.C. and H.P. supervision, H.C. and H.P.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication fee for this manuscript was funded by the Science and Technology Policy Institute (project number: P0200300 and B0200502).

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by STEPI (project number: P020030, title: Global tech-knowledge of strategic resources competitiveness for securing Korea’s competitiveness). Furthermore, this research is related to “Research on Data-based policy priorities for technology innovation-rediscovery of dark data” (project number: B0200502).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

This research focused on Oil resource development field development and production stage digital oil fields.
Table A1. Network analysis results of topic modeling analysis by time series.
Table A1. Network analysis results of topic modeling analysis by time series.
No.2011–20142015–20172018–2020
KeywordsFrequency%KeywordsFrequency%KeywordsFrequency%
1system70416.9system64520.0system61618.6
2process4039.7composition3009.3composition55016.6
3oil3668.8process2668.2process37311.3
4composition3408.2oil2507.8use2407.3
5apparatus3157.6apparatus2297.1device2156.5
6sand3147.5device2236.9apparatus2096.3
7material2886.9sand2226.9material1855.6
8device2786.7material2156.7treatment1454.4
9gas2115.1use1685.2oil1344.1
10use1894.5gas1665.1product1314.0
11production1764.2water1243.8sand1193.6
12water1613.9production1183.7fluid1023.1
13hydrocarbon1543.7product1053.3preparation962.9
14surface1453.5treatment1013.1production962.9
15control1243.0surface932.9hydrocarbon952.9
total 4168100% 3225100% 3306100%

References

  1. Haupt, M. “Data is the New Oil”—A Ludicrous Proposition. Available online: https://medium.com/project-2030/data-is-the-new-oil-a-ludicrous-proposition-1d91bba4f294 (accessed on 7 July 2020).
  2. Hirsch, D.D. The glass house effect: Big Data, the new oil, and the power of analogy. Maine Law Rev. 2013, 66, 373. [Google Scholar]
  3. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources. Smart Evaluation Solution for Oil and Gas Field Based on Integration of Static and Dynamic Data; KIGAM: Daejeon, Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khan, M.Y.; Chetri, H.; Saputelli, L.; Singh, S. Waterflood Optimization and its Impact Using Intelligent Digital Oil Field (Idof) Smart Workflow Processes: A Pilot Study in Sabriyah Mauddud, North Kuwait. In Proceedings of the IPTC 2014: International; North Kuwait Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 19–22 January 2014; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hussain, A.; Vega, J.C.; Hassane, M.A.S.; Yusaf, S.A.; Abdul-Halim, A.A. Enhancing Smart Completion Capabilities by Integration with Digital Oil Field Real Time Monitoring System in a Green Field of ADMA-OPCO. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 7–10 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. HyunTae, K. The Technology Trend of Upstream Field in Oil. Presented at STEPI Presentation Material, Sejong, Korea, 22 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Qin, H.; Han, Z. Stochastic Resource Allocation for Well Control With Digital Oil Field Infrastructure. IEEE Syst. J. 2016, 12, 1295–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burda, B.; Crompton, J.; Sardoff, H.M.; Falconer, J. Information Architecture Strategy for the Digital Oil Field. In Proceedings of the Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, Huston, TX, USA, 11–12 April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tao, Z. IOT’s application in the “Digital Oil Field”. Telecommun. Sci. 2010, 4, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  10. Holland, D. Managing the journey to the digital oil field. Lead. Edge 2004, 23, 1137–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chanana, P.; Soni, T.M.; Bhakne, U. Emerging Technologies and Workflows in Digital Oil Field. In Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 22–25 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Taneja, P.; Wate, P. Big data enabled digital oil field. CSI Commun. 2013, 37, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  13. Holland, D. Digital Oil Field 2.0: Maturity and Paradigms. J. Pet. Technol. 2009, 61, 56–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rajan, S. Future Technologies of the Oil Field. Way Ahead 2011, 7, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Records, L.R.; Shimbo, D.T. Petroleum enterprise intelligence in the digital oil field. In Proceedings of the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 23–25 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Beckwith, R. Apps and the Digital Oil Field. J. Pet. Technol. 2012, 64, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, Z.; Al-Jasmi, A.K.; Qiu, F. Digital Oil Field Experience: An Overview and a Case Study. In Proceedings of the SPE Digital Energy Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 5–7 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Anderson, R.N. ‘Petroleum Analytics Learning Machine’ for optimizing the Internet of Things of today’s digital oil field-to-refinery petroleum system. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 December 2017; pp. 4542–4545. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cramer, R.; Gobel, D.; Mueller, K.; Tulalian, R. A measure of the digital oil field status-is it the end of the beginning? In Proceedings of the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 27–29 March 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
  21. BP, “The Field of the Future technology flagship,” 2014.03. Available online: www.bp.com (accessed on 2 July 2020).
  22. Crompton, J. The Digital Oil Field Hype Curve: A Current Assessment the Oil and Gas Industry’s Digital Oil Field Program. In Proceedings of the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 3–5 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Devries, S.G. Production Management Information Challenges of the Digital Oil Field. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA, 9–12 October 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jafarizadeh, B.; Bratvold, R.B. Strategic Decision Making in the Digital Oil Field. In Proceedings of the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, Huston, TX, USA, 7–8 April 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bonham, G.M.; Heradstveit, D.; Narvesen, O.; Shapiro, M.J. A Cognitive Model of Decision-making: Application to Norwegian Oil Policy. Coop. Confl. 1978, 13, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Oliveira, V.L.C.; Tanajura, A.P.M.; Lepikson, H. A Multi-agent System for Oil Field Management. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2013, 46, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, L.; Xianmei, L. Design of training system of oil field simulation based on virtual reality technology. Comput. Technol. Dev. 2012, 22, 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lim, J.-T.; Park, H.-W.; Lim, J.-S. Classification and Application of Digital Oil Field System. J. Korean Soc. Miner. Energy Resour. Eng. 2014, 51, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwarteng, A.Y. Multitemporal remote sensing data analysis of Kuwait’s oil lakes. Environ. Int. 1998, 24, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Landro, M.; Solheim, O.A.; Hilde, E.; Ekren, B.O.; Stronen, L.K. The Gullfaks 4D seismic study. Pet. Geosci. 1999, 5, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hatchell, P.; Kawar, R.; Savitski, A. Integrating 4D Seismic, Geomechanics and Reservoir Simulation in the Valhall Oil Field. In Proceedings of the 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 June 2005; p. cp-1-00585. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, X.; Jiang, X.; Shi, S.; Chi, T. Digital ocean technological advances. In Remote Sensing and Modeling; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 195–214. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, C. Modeling with Digital Ocean and Digital Coast; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  34. Statista, 2020. Smart Sensors: Global Average Sales Price 2010–2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/736563/global-average-sales-price-of-smart-sensors/ (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  35. Holdaway, K.L. Enhance Digital Oil Fields by Plugging the Technological Capability Gap. In Proceedings of the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, Egypt, 14–17 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Janakiraman, S. Digital oil fields—Intelligent wells and platforms. Pet. Eng. 2018, 16, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research process.
Figure 1. Research process.
Energies 13 05547 g001
Figure 2. Group network analysis of digital oil fields.
Figure 2. Group network analysis of digital oil fields.
Energies 13 05547 g002
Figure 3. Result of topic modeling by time series.
Figure 3. Result of topic modeling by time series.
Energies 13 05547 g003aEnergies 13 05547 g003b
Figure 4. Characteristics of digital oil field (DOF) development by time series.
Figure 4. Characteristics of digital oil field (DOF) development by time series.
Energies 13 05547 g004
Table 1. Results on group network analysis of digital oil fields.
Table 1. Results on group network analysis of digital oil fields.
G1 (Communications Infrastructure)G2 (Processing Modeling)G3 (Sensor and Interface Support)G4 (Control Hardware)
KeywordsFrequencyDegree CentralityKeywordsFrequencyDegree CentralityKeywordsFrequencyDegree CentralityKeywordsFrequencyDegree Centrality
method466993process104659device71839plant16426
system197273apparatus76041treatment39652power13919
composition119662oil75049production39256acid12120
material68851sand65557fuel20425unit7617
use60065gas45946compound17421
product33339fluid37536particle13517
surface29740water37148agent12918
coating22526hydrocarbon31240mixture11927
preparation20130control28137medium10922
polymer18733application20131storage10623
metal18631recovery19535bed9718
structure18426formation18317soil9111
assembly17824catalyst16818reactor9015
Tool17321processing15527filter8322
carbon15723heat15326chemical8125
cement14918energy14418
mold14022waste14329
component12925flow13623
construction12022operation12820
vehicle11919fracturing12322
sanding11313conversion11518
core10421bitumen10720
casting10118stream10316
manufacture10018removal10127
article9814extraction10021
manufacturing9720temperature9819
proppant9711slurry9620
formulation9618separation9119
element938feedstock8919
layer9018tailing8411
machine9012pressure8313
resin9015biomass8218
panel8913liquid8115
glass8616screen7711
concrete8512well7613
skin836steam7512
fiber8111proppants748
foam7922field7214
binder7612
support7612
body7511
building7212
fracture7212
Table 2. Characteristics of DOF development by time series.
Table 2. Characteristics of DOF development by time series.
Group DivisionⅠ (2011–2014)Ⅱ (2015–2017)Ⅲ (2018–2020)
Frequency%Frequency%Frequency%
G1 (Communications infrastructure)521151.6%434955.1%434456.9%
G2 (Processing modeling)359135.6%256832.5%215828.3%
G3 (Sensor and interface support)111611.1%83910.6%95112.5%
G4 (Control Hardware)1781.8%1411.8%1772.3%
Total10096100%7897100%7630100%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.; Park, H. “Oil is the New Data”: Energy Technology Innovation in Digital Oil Fields. Energies 2020, 13, 5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215547

AMA Style

Choi H, Park H. “Oil is the New Data”: Energy Technology Innovation in Digital Oil Fields. Energies. 2020; 13(21):5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, HaeOk, and Hwanll Park. 2020. "“Oil is the New Data”: Energy Technology Innovation in Digital Oil Fields" Energies 13, no. 21: 5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215547

APA Style

Choi, H., & Park, H. (2020). “Oil is the New Data”: Energy Technology Innovation in Digital Oil Fields. Energies, 13(21), 5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215547

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop