Next Article in Journal
Hybrid System Assessment in On-Grid and Off-Grid Conditions: A Technical and Economical Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Opportunities in Measuring Multiscale Pore Structure of the Continental Shale of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Graphene in Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of PDMS/GA Composite Materials by Pickering Emulsion Method and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation

1
Petroleum Engineering College, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China
2
South China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(17), 5283; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175283
Submission received: 25 July 2021 / Revised: 16 August 2021 / Accepted: 23 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021

Abstract

:
With the intensification of human activities, a large amount of oil and organic solvent waste has been created, resulting in serious ecological and environmental pollution. Therefore, how to balance environmental benefits and economic benefits control a large number of organic solvent and oil pollution is an urgent problem. To solve this problem, a highly efficient oil-water separation material was designed and prepared in this paper. Graphene oxide aerogels were synthesized by the Pickering emulsion and hydrothermal method, and then hydrophobically lipophilic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) reduced graphene oxide aerogel composites (PDMS/GA) were obtained by modification of PDMS. The surface functional groups, hydrophobicity, thermal stability, and micromorphology of the materials were tested by various characterization methods. Their properties were tested by an oil absorption test and repeated experiments. The oil absorption performance experiments and repeated performance experiments of PDMS/GA are reported. The number of oxy-gen-containing functional groups of the modified graphene oxide (GO) decreased, and the contact angle of water was 134.4°. The adsorption capacity of n-hexane was up to 18.5 times its own weight. The material has the advantages of being lightweight, easy to recover, good hydrophobicity and lipophilicity, and has the potential for large-scale applications in the field of oil-water separation.

1. Introduction

In the 21st century, there are a many problems in the scientific field that need to be studied in depth, such as the energy crisis [1,2] and environmental pollution issues [3,4]. There is an urgent need for lightweight, high porosity, environmentally friendly, and sustainable materials with high mechanical properties in many emerging research fields such as energy storage [5,6], sensors [7,8], thermal insulation materials [9,10], adsorption [11,12], and so on. If any material can be called the king of lightweight, graphene oxide (GO) with the largest specific surface area must be the first choice [13,14]. GO has abundant oxygen-containing functional groups [15,16], which allows it to be active in many reactions. The material synthesized as a raw material has high porosity [17,18], low density [19,20], and low thermal conductivity [21,22], which has attracted widespread attention.
Hydrophobic graphene aerogel (GA) synthesized by the hydrothermal method, due to its high oil absorption performance, no pollution to the environment, and good selective oil absorption performance in water, makes it a relatively good choice in the treatment of marine oil spill accidents [23,24]. However, in terms of practical application, due to the easy coalescence of GO during the initial reaction, its products often have problems such as high brittleness, fragility, hygroscopicity, and non-renewability, which limit its commercial use [25,26,27]. In order to obtain higher porosity and lower density of graphene-based nanocomposites, better mechanical strength, and an increase in the dispersion of GO in the initial reaction, the preparation of Pickering emulsion before the hydrothermal reaction is a solution to the dispersion of GO.
In 2010, Kim et al. [28] first proposed and verified that GO can form a very stable Pickering emulsion due to its parental characteristics. Li et al. [29] verified through experiments that GO’s Pickering emulsion is an oil-in-water emulsion. Song et al. [30] reported that GO stabilized styrene/water Pickering emulsion can produce polystyrene coated with graphene oxide. Kulkarni et al. used the Pickering emulsion method to synthesize hydrophobic GA through freeze-drying and high-temperature annealing, but there is no doubt that the raw materials and experimental conditions used in this synthesis are far from being applicable to industrial mass production [31].
In this study, we used a simple mechanical stirring method to mix GO, ethylenediamine, n-hexane, and deionized water to form a Pickering emulsion to increase the dispersion of GO. Next, through a hydrothermal reaction, GO was combined through the π–π bond forces to obtain graphene oxide hydrogel. The hydrogel was dialyzed with a hydroalcoholic solution to remove n-hexane, and then lyophilized to obtain GA, modified by Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to obtain PDMS/GA. The microscopic morphology and structure of the composite aerogel were characterized, and the adsorption capacity of the composite aerogel for n-hexane was studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Flake graphite (325 mesh 99.6 wt%; Nanjing Xianfeng Nanomaterials Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4 98%; Beijing Chemical Reagent Factory, Beijing, China), potassium permanganate (KMnO4 99.5%; Beijing Chemical Reagent Factory, Beijing, China), sodium nitrate (AR Tianjin Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 30%; Shanghai Civic Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), ethylenediamine (Shanghai Civic Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), PDMS (Dow Corning Corporation 184), and n-hexane (Shanghai Civic Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.2. Instruments and Characterization

LEICA DM2500P microscope and supporting instruments (DM2500P polarizing microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany); JY-PHB type contact angle measuring instrument (Chengde Jinhe Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Chengde, China); DHG-9030A type vacuum drying oven (Shanghai Yiheng Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China); Panalytical model X-ray diffraction Instrument (Netherlands PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands); Thermo Fisher Nicolet Is5 model FTIR (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, America); Thermo Scientific Apreo 2C model field emission scanning electron microscope (Beijing Obertong Optical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Preparation of GO

The preparation method of GO adopted the hummers’ method, and the preparation method was improved. The main preparation method was: add 23 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid into a three-necked flask and placing the flask in an ice water bath, with the temperature less than 8 °C. Add 1g of natural flake graphite powder and 0.5 g of NaNO3 under the condition of constant stirring, add 3 g of KMnO4 to it after 3 min, and continue to stir and react for 2 h. Then, the temperature was raised to 35 °C and reacted for 35 min. After that, 46 mL of deionized water was added to the three-necked flask and the temperature was raised to 98 °C. After stirring the reaction for 20 min, 5 mL of H2O2 (5%) was added to neutralize the excess KMnO4, and then transferred to the refrigerator. After cooling overnight, the obtained solution was washed repeatedly with 0.1 mol/L dilute hydrochloric acid and deionized water and transferred to a drying box for drying to obtain GO.

2.3.2. Preparation of GA by the Pickering Emulsion Method

Disperse 20 mg of graphene oxide into 5 mL of deionized water, add 20 μL of ethylenediamine, 2 mL of n-hexane, and stir at high shear for 20 min to obtain a Pickering emulsion. The formed Pickering emulsion is shown in Figure 1. Put the solution into a high temperature and high pressure reactor with a polytetrafluoroethylene lining, heat it at 180 °C for 10 h, cool it naturally to room temperature, take out the graphene oxide hydrogel, and dialyze it several times with a hydroalcoholic solution at −30 °C. After freezing for 12 h and freeze-drying for 48 h, graphene oxide aerogel was obtained.

2.3.3. PDMS Modified Graphene Oxide Aerogel

Dissolve 1.1 g PDMS in 50 mL n-hexane solution (PDMS purchased from Dow Corning 184, 1 g A glue and 0.1 g B glue were mixed for use), immerse the graphene oxide aerogel in an appropriate amount of PDMS. The solution was heated in a vacuum drying oven at 60 °C for 2 h to pre-cure the PDMS, then the cured aerogel was further processed at 120 °C for 6 h to obtain an aerogel sample. As shown in Figure 2, a final graphene oxide aerogel that can be supported on flowers is obtained.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition Analysis of GO, GA, and PDMS/GA

Figure 3 reports X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO, GA and PDMS/GA. There was a very sharp diffraction peak at 2θ = 10.990° and the interlayer spacing was 8.0441. This is due to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups such as hydroxyl carboxyl groups on the GO surface, which leads to the presence of intercalated water molecules. The improved interlayer spacing and the graphene oxide synthesized in other literature [32] was basically the same. From the XRD pattern of GA, it can be seen that a wider diffraction peak was observed at 2θ = 24.014°, the corresponding interlayer spacing was d = 0.37027 nm. The intensity of the diffraction peak was reduced, the diffraction peak became wider and the sharp diffraction peak disappeared. These changes indicate that the oxygen-containing functional group indicated by GO was removed by the hydrothermal reduction reaction, which reduced the interlayer spacing of GA and improved the hydrophobicity to a certain extent. From the XRD pattern of PDMS/GA, it can be seen that the modified PDMS/GA was in an amorphous state.
In Figure 4, since all samples were freeze-dried or vacuum-dried and then subjected to thermogravimetric treatment, there was no significant quality degradation at 25–120 °C. The first significant thermal weight-loss stage of GO was 150–240 °C. The weight loss in this stage was mainly caused by the decomposition of oxygen-containing functional groups in GO; after 240 °C, the slow decrease in the mass of GO was also caused by the decomposition of oxygen-containing functional groups; After 475℃, its mass continued to decrease, which was due to the change in mass caused by the burning of amorphous carbon in the graphite powder during the test. GA and PDMS/GA continued to decrease slowly from 150 °C, which indicated that the unreduced oxygen-containing groups disappeared. At 475 °C, the amorphous carbon in the gel starts to burn, so there is a significant thermal weight loss stage. At 730 °C due to PDMS, the combustion of the silicone rubber formed after curing leads to changes in the quality development and a significant thermal weight loss stage.
The infrared spectrum of GO is shown in Figure 5. There are strong characteristic peaks at 3446 cm−1 (stretching vibration of -OH), absorption peaks at 1403 cm−1 (deformation vibration of -OH), and 1110 cm−1 (stretching vibration of C-O-C); all are caused by the oxygen-containing functional groups. It is worth noting that, compared with GO, the 3446, 1403, 1110 cm−1 peaks in the infrared spectrum of GA almost disappeared, and the band of oxygen-containing functional groups decreased significantly, which proved that graphene oxide was effectively reduced and the material was hydrophobic and lipophilic. Performance has been improved to a certain extent.
In the infrared spectrum of PDMS-GA, there is the C-H strong symmetrical stretching vibration peak of -CH3 (2963 cm−1), the in-plane bending vibration peak of Si-CH3 (1262 cm−1), the stretching vibration peak of Si-O-Si (1092 cm−1), and the symmetric stretching vibration peak of Si-O-Si bond (801 cm−1). The appearance of these new characteristic peaks indicates that PDMS was successfully grafted onto GA. Since the oxygen-containing groups on the PDMS/GA surface are greatly reduced at this time, the hydrophobic and lipophilic properties of the material are improved.
In Figure 6, GO has many oxygen-containing groups, exhibits hydrophilic characteristics, and has a contact angle of 56.7° to water. Ethylenediamine is used as a cross-linking agent and reducing agent to obtain graphene oxide aerogels with a contact angle of 81.3° by the Pickering emulsion method. This is because the surface contains too many oxygen groups and cannot achieve super-hydrophobicity. When further modified, the gel prepared by the Pickering emulsion method has better elasticity and tighter structure.
As an excellent hydrophobic modification substance, PDMS can not only hydrophobically modify graphene oxide, but also solidify the overall shape of aerogel so that the aerogel will not deform in the next high-temperature reduction. After the PDMS is cured at 60 °C, the graphene oxide aerogel is further reduced at a high temperature. Under vacuum and 120 °C, the oxygen-containing group chemical bonds of graphene oxide are broken at high temperature, forming small molecules of water and carbon dioxide. Due to the solidification of PDMS, the interlayer spacing between graphene oxide sheets remains unchanged, and the graphene oxide aerogel with a hydrophobic angle of 134.4° is finally obtained.
Figure 7a,b shows GA prepared by the Pickering emulsion method at 95 °C under high pressure. It can be found that the pores of graphene oxide folds are uniform and small owing to the use of n-hexane oil droplets as a template for the fold pores. Figure 7c,d shows the PDMS/GA. It is found that the outer layer of the modified aerogel is evenly covered with a layer of silicone rubber. Compared with the first two synthetic products, PDMS/GA composite materials by the Pickering emulsion method can still maintain the pore morphology. This means it can be used as a good oil-absorbing material.

3.2. Oil Absorption Test

Figure 8 reported the test chart of the adsorption performance of PDMS/GA, all n-hexane in the liquid surface could be adsorbed within 4 s. The adsorption capacity can reach 18.5 g/g. After evaporating n-hexane at high temperature, repeated adsorption of n-hexane still shows excellent adsorption performance, it can still adsorb about 10 times of n-hexane after five cycles, which is shown in Figure 9.
Dai et al. [33] prepared a three-dimensional macroscopic superhydrophobic magnetic porous carbon aerogel with popcorn as raw material; its adsorption capacity for corn oil was 10.28 g/g. He et al. [34] reported a kind of Superhydrophobic bacterial cellulose/SiO2 aerogels (BCAs/SAs); its adsorption capacity for corn oil was 8–14 g/g. The biodegradable cellulose aerogel prepared by Zhao et al. [35] could absorb 10 times its own weight.
Compared with the above research, the adsorption capacity of PDMS/GA on oil-water mixture was improved.

4. Discussion

In summary, a graphene oxide aerogel was modified by PDMS by the Pickering emulsion method with a trace amount of ethylenediamine as a cross-linking agent and reducing agent. The advantages of PDMS/GA are that it has good elasticity, no pollution, strong adsorption capacity for pollutants, and easy recycling and regeneration. The prepared graphene oxide aerogels have a loose and porous structure, and pollutants can fill the pores so that the reduced graphene foam has certain adsorption characteristics for pollutants. Aerogels have good adsorption performance for organic solvents and oil pollutants, and their adsorption capacity of n-hexane can be up to 18.5 times. At the same time, the recyclability of the aerogel makes PDMS/GA widely used in practical applications.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, formal analysis, investigation, B.W.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, Q.L., Z.F. and T.L.; resources and visualization, T.L., Q.T. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project is Supported by Heilongjiang Province Natural Science Foundation of “Study on flocculation of oilfield wastewater with magnetic nano-materials Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2”. Fund No.: LH2020E014.

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to my friends, Leipeng Leng, Mingyang Zhang, and Chenyi You for their long-term care of me in life and experiments. Most of the scientific research starts from curiosity to solve a puzzle. It is meant to be fun and needs to be creative. Learning and experimenting are parts of life; learn to love yourself first and then love others. I love you so much. Thanks again.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Melin, H. Towards a solution to the energy crisis. Nat. Astron. 2020, 4, 837–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ouyang, Y.; Shi, L.; Bai, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, J. Breaking scaling relations for efficient CO2 electrochemical reduction through dual-atom catalysts. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 1807–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Walker, T.R. Canada right to classify single-use plastics as toxic. Nature 2021, 594, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mai, L.; He, H.; Bao, L.J.; Liu, L.Y.; Zeng, E.Y. Plastics Are an Insignificant Carrier of Riverine Organic Pollutants to the Coastal Oceans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 15852–15860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sun, W.; Wang, F.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, M.; Winter, M. A rechargeable zinc-air battery based on zinc peroxide chemistry. Science 2021, 371, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hafiz, H.; Suzuki, K.; Barbiellini, B.; Tsuji, N.; Viswanathan, V. Tomographic reconstruction of oxygen orbitals in lithium-rich battery materials. Nature 2021, 594, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogers, C.; Piggott, A.Y.; Thomson, D.J.; Wiser, R.F.; Nicolaescu, R. A universal 3D imaging sensor on a silicon photonics platform. Nature 2020, 590, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Purnell, B.A. Bioenergetic sensor for exercise. Science 2020, 370, 806–807. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qian, X.; Zhou, J.; Chen, G. Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1188–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Almeida, C.; Ghica, M.E.; Ramalho, A.L.; Dures, L. Silica-based aerogel composites reinforced with different aramid fibres for thermal insulation in Space environments. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 13604–13619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lokamani, M.; Kelling, J.; Ohmann, R.; Meyer, J.; Kühne, T.; Cuniberti, G.; Wolf, J.; Huhn, T.; Zahn, P.; Moresco, F. A combined experimental and theoretical study of 1,4-bis(phenylethynyl)-2,5-bis(ethoxy)benzene adsorption on Au(111). Surf. Sci. 2021, 712, 121877. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ye, R.; Zhao, M.; Mao, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, P. Nanoscale cooperative adsorption for materials control. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, J.; Yan, Q.; Lv, L.; Tan, X.; Dai, W. Lightweight thermal interface materials based on hierarchically structured graphene paper with superior through-plane thermal conductivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Di, S.; Feng, F.; Han, H.; Ma, Z. Prominent adsorption performance of amino-functionalized ultra-light graphene aerogel for methyl orange and amaranth. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 324, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun, J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Jankowski, P.; Xiao, L.; Jankowski, P. Critical Role of Functional Groups Containing N, S, and O on Graphene Surface for Stable and Fast Charging Li-S Batteries. Small 2021, 17, 2007242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, X.; Ren, R.; Lv, Y. A self-prepared graphene oxide/sodium alginate aerogel as biological carrier to improve the performance of a heterotrophic nitrifier. Biochem. Eng. J. 2021, 171, 108027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Malik, S.; Gul, I.H.; Baig, M.M. Hierarchical MnNiCo ternary metal oxide/graphene nanoplatelets composites as high rated electrode material for Supercapacitors. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 17008–17014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shaikh, J.S.; Shaikh, N.S.; Mishra, Y.K.; Pawar, S.S.; Parveen, N.; Shewale, P.M.; Sabale, S.; Kanjanaboos, P.; Praserthdam, S.; Lokhande, C.D. The implementation of graphene-based aerogel in the field of supercapacitor. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 362001–362023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kuila, T.; Bose, S.; Chang, E.H.; Uddin, M.E.; Khanra, P.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Preparation of functionalized graphene/linear low density polyethylene composites by a solution mixing method. Carbon 2011, 49, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kuila, T.; Bose, S.; Mishra, A.K.; Khanra, P.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Effect of functionalized graphene on the physical properties of linear low density polyethylene nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2012, 31, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mortazavi, B.; Fan, Z.; Pereira, L.; Harju, A.; Rabczuk, T. Amorphized graphene: A stiff material with low thermal conductivity. Carbon 2016, 103, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, J.C.; Wi, J.H.; Ri, N.C.; Ri, S.I. Thermal conductivity of graphene/graphane/graphene heterostructure nanoribbons: Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Solid State Commun. 2021, 328, 114249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lza, B.; Xin, X.C.; Cca, B.; Bca, B. Facile synthesis of porous CoFe2O4 /graphene aerogel for catalyzing efficient removal of organic pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 143398. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, H.; Gao, B.; Yuan, W.; Li, H.; Chen, Z. Modification of graphene aerogel with titania nanotubes for efficient methylene blue adsorption kinetics. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2021, 97, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, J.; Huang, X.; He, M.; Zhang, B.; Feng, G.; Yin, G.; Cui, Y. Control of graphene aerogel self-assembly in strongly acidic solution via solution polarity tuning. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 21155–21163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, Z.; Richardson, G.F.; Meng, Q.; Zhu, S.; Ma, J. PEDOT-based composites as electrode materials for supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2015, 27, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Fan, Z. A Mini Review: Application Progress of Magnetic Graphene Three-Dimensional Materials for Water Purification. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 595643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, J.; Cote, L.J.; Kim, F.; Yuan, W.; Shull, K.R.; Huang, J. Graphene oxide sheets at interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhu, X.; Li, H.; Huang, S.; Hu, Y.; Qi, C.; Zhong, S. Graphene oxide as a sacrificial material for fabricating molecularly imprinted polymer via Pickering emulsion polymerization. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74654–74661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, H. PS colloidal particles stabilized by graphene oxide. Langmuir 2011, 27, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kulkarni, A.; Jana, S.C. Surfactant-free syndiotactic polystyrene aerogel foams via Pickering emulsion. Polymer 2020, 212, 123125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ji, C.; Yao, B.; Li, C.; Shi, G. An improved Hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon 2013, 64, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dai, J.; Zhang, R.; Ge, W.; Xie, A.; Chang, Z.; Tian, S.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, Y. 3D macroscopic superhydrophobic magnetic porous carbon aerogel converted from biorenewable popcorn for selective oil-water separation. Mater. Des. 2018, 139, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jian, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Dong, S.; Zhang, F.; Ji, H.; Rui, L. Superelastic and superhydrophobic bacterial cellulose/silica aerogels with hierarchical cellular structure for oil absorption and recovery. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 346, 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhao, L.; Lian, L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Meng, G.; Liu, Z.; Guo, X. Preparation and characterization of thermo- and pH dual-responsive 3D cellulose-based aerogel for oil/water separation. Appl. Phys. A 2018, 124, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Micrograph of graphene oxide Pickering emulsion.
Figure 1. Micrograph of graphene oxide Pickering emulsion.
Energies 14 05283 g001
Figure 2. Graphene oxide aerogel easily supported by flowers.
Figure 2. Graphene oxide aerogel easily supported by flowers.
Energies 14 05283 g002
Figure 3. XRD of raw GO, GA and PDMS/GA (The blue shade indicates 2θ = 10.990°; The purple shade indicates 2θ = 24.014°).
Figure 3. XRD of raw GO, GA and PDMS/GA (The blue shade indicates 2θ = 10.990°; The purple shade indicates 2θ = 24.014°).
Energies 14 05283 g003
Figure 4. The GO of raw GO, GA, and PDMS/GA.
Figure 4. The GO of raw GO, GA, and PDMS/GA.
Energies 14 05283 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of raw GO, GA, and PDMS/GA (the shadows from left to right are 3446 cm−1, 2963 cm−1, 1403 cm−1, 1262 cm−1, 1092 cm−1, and 801 cm−1).
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of raw GO, GA, and PDMS/GA (the shadows from left to right are 3446 cm−1, 2963 cm−1, 1403 cm−1, 1262 cm−1, 1092 cm−1, and 801 cm−1).
Energies 14 05283 g005
Figure 6. (a) Contact angle of GO; (b) Contact angle of GA; (c) Contact angle of PDMS/GA.
Figure 6. (a) Contact angle of GO; (b) Contact angle of GA; (c) Contact angle of PDMS/GA.
Energies 14 05283 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) of raw GA and PDMS/GA. (a,b) is SEM of GA; (c,d) is SEM of PDMS/GA.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) of raw GA and PDMS/GA. (a,b) is SEM of GA; (c,d) is SEM of PDMS/GA.
Energies 14 05283 g007
Figure 8. The test chart of the adsorption performance of PDMS modified graphene oxide aerogel on oil red-dyed n-hexane. (ah) is a photo taken every 0.5 s of adsorption.
Figure 8. The test chart of the adsorption performance of PDMS modified graphene oxide aerogel on oil red-dyed n-hexane. (ah) is a photo taken every 0.5 s of adsorption.
Energies 14 05283 g008
Figure 9. Absorption–desorption recyclability of PDMS/GA for n-hexane.
Figure 9. Absorption–desorption recyclability of PDMS/GA for n-hexane.
Energies 14 05283 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Fan, Z.; Liang, T.; Tong, Q.; Fu, Y. Fabrication of PDMS/GA Composite Materials by Pickering Emulsion Method and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation. Energies 2021, 14, 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175283

AMA Style

Wang B, Liu Q, Fan Z, Liang T, Tong Q, Fu Y. Fabrication of PDMS/GA Composite Materials by Pickering Emulsion Method and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation. Energies. 2021; 14(17):5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Biao, Qingwang Liu, Zhenzhong Fan, Ting Liang, Qilei Tong, and Yuanfeng Fu. 2021. "Fabrication of PDMS/GA Composite Materials by Pickering Emulsion Method and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation" Energies 14, no. 17: 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175283

APA Style

Wang, B., Liu, Q., Fan, Z., Liang, T., Tong, Q., & Fu, Y. (2021). Fabrication of PDMS/GA Composite Materials by Pickering Emulsion Method and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation. Energies, 14(17), 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop