Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What pro-environment activities did Miejska Energetyka Cieplna in Koszalin carry out in 2017–2020?
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
- The company creates the best conditions for the supply of heat to current and future customers,
- The company has the strongest commercial brand in the district heating sector in Koszalin,
- The company uses the latest technologies in the production, transfer and distribution of thermal energy,
- The company strives to optimize the costs of heat sales, taking into account in long-term development plans the production of thermal energy in combination with electricity,
- The company takes care of the protection of the environment in the city of Koszalin, which has the title “Green City”.
- heat transmission and distribution infrastructure—113.4 km of heat network (including 70% pre-insulated pipe);
- 760 heat transfer stations;
- two DPM/FUB boiler plants providing total installed capacity 174.43 MW for shared use;
- two local gas-fired boiler plants providing total installed capacity 0.3 MW;
- a district boiler plant in the town of Sianów providing total installed capacity 4.7 MW and gas-fired boiler plant with capacity 0.5 MW;
- contracted capacity 134 MW;
- over 1 m GJ of heat energy sold annually.
- generation, transmission and distribution of heat;
- construction, expansion, improvement and refurbishment of the heat network, related energy devices, including their maintenance;
- investment services, consulting, advisory activity, designing related to heat.
- to respect the natural environment in and around Koszalin;
- to excel in quality;
- to operate profitably and effectively;
- to connect new users to its heat network;
- to reduce costs of heat generation/transmission/distribution;
- to closely collaborate across the source-distributor-user relationship to yield heat savings and lower costs of heat generation;
- to adapt own staff to the latest market conditions (customer-oriented model); apart from the technical quality of supply, the level of service should be reflected in proper customer communication and culture (complaints, billing, etc.);
- to address constant and high technical advancement of the heat industry; to effectively implement the latest technology and technical solutions; and to ensure innovation in heat energy generation.
4. Results
- to achieve environmental goals and tasks;
- to reasonably use energy and water resources (including to lower consumption of electricity and utility water);
- to minimise waste and achieve environmentally safe waste management, by optimising the company’s activities and by sorting, storing and moving waste to recycling/treatment providers;
- to reasonably use resources;
- to improve cooling of the heat medium in heat transfer stations;
- to maintain low emission of air pollutants, by implementing the latest technical solutions that are environment-friendly;
- to satisfy all regulatory requirements (including for emissions) according to statutes and other regulations in the area of environment, occupational health and safety;
- to periodically review and identify any new aspects to address; to give priority to environmental aspects; and to take actions preventing contamination of the natural environment;
- to implement a waste management policy that will be environment-friendly and warrant waste sorting, reuse and recycling as well as further treatment as needed according to the regulatory environmental requirements.
- it appropriately reflects the objectives of the company’s activity as well as its external and internal context;
- it is based on the company’s strategic growth directions and supports them;
- it sets forth a framework for determining environmental goals;
- it expresses personal commitment to create conditions needed to implement the policy across all areas of the company’s activity, and to achieve the defined environmental goals;
- it is formulated based on the principle of mitigation of threats and leveraging of opportunities.
- maintain and continuously enhance the Environmental Management System according to PN-EN ISO 14001:2015;
- constantly develop effectiveness of that system and ensure resources needed for its proper operation and development;
- protect the environment, including prevent its contamination;
- satisfy regulatory compliance requirements (including legal requirements applicable to the company’s operations).
- to improve technical parameters of atmospheric emissions;
- to greatly reduce PM emissions by applying high-efficiency extraction devices;
- to lower carbon oxide emissions;
- to diminish hydrocarbon emissions;
- to enable reduction of SO2 emissions when fuel is changed to a better one;
- to greatly improve technical parameters of emissions: time and temperature of combustion, height of emission source, travel of combustion gases;
- to reduce consumption of energy media;
- to lower emissions of air pollutants and volume of waste;
- to limit heat losses;
- to improve environmental management.
- thanks to the promotion of lower heat demand (thermal performance improvements and heat automation systems), the company managed to produce less air pollutants because its efforts has led to reduced consumption of fuel;
- improved quality of fuel (high-quality fuel only that contains less ash and sulphur);
- reduced consumption of fuel thanks to better performance of heat transfer devices (upgraded boilers improved performance by ca. 5 percent);
- lower overall consumption of fuel (by 10–15 percent) thanks to better performance of main heat transfer devices;
- limited heat losses in heat network;
- reduced consumption of electricity (thanks to frequency transducers ensuring smooth adjustment of pumps and vents);
- improved heat transfer stations;
- eradicated local coal-fired boiler plants;
- eradicated old heat transfer technology (improved system safety and lower consumption of heat by ca. 17 percent).
- educational projects related to environmental protection;
- environment-oriented promotional campaigns (leaflets, films, articles, sign boards);
- sponsoring activity related to environmental protection;
- other actions enhancing the community.
- challenges in energy and heating sectors from the perspective of environmental protection;
- protection of air: new requirements;
- waste management;
- Environmental Protection Academy—regulatory changes;
- 6th Edition—co-generation project development factors;
- Environmental Protection Law Academy—key changes;
- Waste Law amendment of July 2018;
- session at National Environmental Protection Fund (NFOŚiGW) in Warsaw;
- new waste management rules on local government level;
- waste incineration plant strategy vs reality.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- implementation of ISO 50001 standard,
- introduction of ECSR in the supply chain,
- annual CSR reporting,
- implementation of CSR-dedicated standards (e.g., ISO 26000).
7. Limitations
8. Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wyszomirski, A.; Olkiewicz, M. Environmental corporate social responsibility as a tool for creating the future of environmental protection. Rocz. Ochr. Srodowiska 2020, 22, 1145–1161. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Wei, J.; Lu, L. Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 1027–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, J.; Mahmood, S.; Ali, H.; Ali Raza, M.; Ali, G.; Aman, J.; Nurunnabi, M. The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmental Factors through a Moderating Role of Social Media Marketing on Sustainable Performance of Business Firms. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Green, T.; Peloza, J. How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? J. Consum. Mark. 2011, 28, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hąbek, P.; Wolniak, R. Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 399–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ponomarenko, T.V.; Wolniak, R.; Marinina, O.A. Corporate Social responsibility in coal industry (Practices of russian and european companies). J. Min. Inst. 2016, 222, 882–891. [Google Scholar]
- Wolniak, R. The corporate social responsibility practices in mining sector in Spain and in Poland—Similarities and differences. Sci. Pap. Sil. Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser. 2017, 2017, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hąbek, P.; Wolniak, R. Factors Influencing the Development of CSR Reporting Practices: Experts’ versus Preparers’ Points of View. Eng. Econ. 2015, 26, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wolniak, R.; Hąbek, P. Quality assessment of CSR reports—Factor analysis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 220, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hąbek, P.; Wolniak, R. Relationship between management practices and quality of CSR reports. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 220, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wei, Z.; Song, X.; Makhdoom, Z.H.; Xie, P. Paradox strategic cognition and ECSR in China: A three-tripod perspective. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 2019, 25, 392–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Famiyeh, S. Corporate social responsibility and firm’s performance: Empirical evidence. Soc. Responsib. J. 2017, 13, 390–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moir, L. What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2001, 1, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hussain, T.; Abbas, J.; Wei, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Xuehao, B.; Gaoli, Z. Impact of Urban Village Disamenity on Neighboring Residential Properties: Empirical Evidence from Nanjing through Hedonic Pricing Model Appraisal. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2021, 147, 04020055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ditlev-Simonsen, C.D. From corporate social responsibility awareness to action? Soc. Responsib. J. 2010, 6, 452–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tran, A.N.; Jeppesen, S. SMEs in their Own Right: The Views of Managers and Workers in Vietnamese Textiles, Garment, and Footwear Companies. J. Bus. Ethic. 2016, 137, 589–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vives, A. Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America. J. Corp. Citizsh. 2006, 2006, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Zieliński, M. Social and Economic Aspects of CSR in Employment Restructuring of the Polish Coal Mining, Zbornik Vedeckych Prac. Stefan Majtan a Kolektiv. Ekonomicka Univerzita v Bratislave. Fakulta Podnikoveho Manazmentu. Katedra Podnikovohospodarska; Vydavatel’stvo Ekonom: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2018; pp. 589–598. [Google Scholar]
- Shilei, H.; Wang, X. The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness—Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, J.; Su, E.; Wang, S. When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? The Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation. J. Bus. Ethic. 2019, 158, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y. Consumer Responses to the Food Industry’s Proactive and Passive Environmental CSR, Factoring in Price as CSR Tradeoff. J. Bus. Ethic. 2017, 140, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, J.; Zhao, W. Institutional Linkages with the State and Organizational Practices in Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Manag. Organ. Rev. 2017, 13, 539–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnall, N.; Henriques, I.; Sadorsky, P. Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size. J. Manag. Stud. 2009, 47, 1072–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonek-Kowalska, I. Efficiency of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) systems. Comparative analysis in the fuel sector and energy sector on the basis of Central-European companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Resour. Policy 2019, 62, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonek-Kowalska, I. Long-term Analysis of the Effects of Production Management in Coal Mining in Poland. Energies 2019, 12, 3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bras, T.M.C. Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Energy Sector in Portugal, Tecnico Lisoa. 2014. Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiAgfnN6sHvAhUFAhAIHYHBCwYQFjAFegQICxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt%2FdownloadFile%2F563345090413567%2Fdissertacao.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2skgIz-GNQVOktMn8eDRmH (accessed on 21 March 2021).
- Rashid, N.R.N.A.; Khalid, S.A.; Rahman, N.I.A. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR): Exploring its Influence on Customer Loyalty. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 31, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, E.M.; Mais, E.L. Framing the “Green” alternative for environmentally conscious consumers. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2010, 1, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feroz, A.K.; Zo, H.; Chiravuri, A. Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forcadell, F.J.; Úbeda, F.; Aracil, E. Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on innovativeness of spanish industrial SMEs✰,✰✰,★,★★. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 162, 120355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Pan, Y.; Sun, H.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. Can Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk? Evidence From China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 8, 608115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, T.-W.; Yeh, Y.-L.; Li, H.-X. How to Shape an Organization’s Sustainable Green Management Performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wei, Z.; Song, X.; Na, S.; Ye, J. When does environmental corporate social responsibility promote managerial ties in China? The moderating role of industrial power and market hierarchy. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 2020, 26, 642–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 15, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, M.; Coates, J. Environmental ethics for social work: Social work’s responsibility to the non-human world. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 2011, 21, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobers, P. Corporate social responsibility: Management and methods. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2009, 16, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gu, J. Spatial Dynamics between Firm Sales and Environmental Responsibility: The Mediating Role of Corporate Innovation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Ullah, R.; Shah, S.J. Linking Corporate Environmental Performance to Financial Performance of Pakistani Firms: The Roles of Technological capability and Public awareness. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Chin, T.; Zhu, W. Will Green CSR Enhance Innovation? A Perspective of Public Visibility and Firm Transparency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chao, A.C.; Pu, Z. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmentally Sound Technology in Endogenous Firm Growth. Sustainability 2017, 9, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jia, Y.; Yan, J.; Liu, T.; Huang, J. How Does Internal and External CSR Affect Employees’ Work Engagement? Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bătae, O.M.; Dragomir, V.D.; Feleagă, L. The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 290, 125791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olkiewicz, M. The role of the stakeholder in the quality improvement of an organization. Sci. Pap. Sil. Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Ser. 2020, 2020, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olkiewicz, M. Quality improvement through foresight methodology as a direction to increase the effectiveness of an organization. Contemp. Econ. 2018, 12, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bombiak, E.; Marciniuk-Kluska, A. Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bansal, P.; Roth, K. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 717–736. [Google Scholar]
- Cliza, M.C.; Spataru-Negura, L.C. Environmental protection derived from the European convention for human rights and from the European social charter. LESIJ 2020, XXVII, 121–134. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C. Monopoly with corporate social responsibility, product differentiation, and environmental R&D: Implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 287, 125433. [Google Scholar]
- Arpad, T. Willing to pay to save the planet? Evaluating support for increased spending on sustainable development and environmentally friendly policies in five countries. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Du, J. Certification of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Differentiated Duopoly Market. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 2017, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mai, K.N.; Nguyen, P.N.; Nguyen, A.K.; Tran, N.M. The effects of managerial perceptions on CSR practices and corporate financial performance: An evidence from Vietnam. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 8, 858–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruchello, G.; Johnstone, R.L. Comment on Rights and Value: The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Addresses the Environment. Stud. Soc. Justice 2013, 7, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Local Burden of Disease HIV Collaborators. Mapping subnational HIV mortality in six Latin American countries with incomplete vital registration systems. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, K.R.; Hussain, K.; Abbas, J.; Adedoyin, F.F.; Shaikh, P.A.; Yousaf, H.; Muhammad, F. Analyzing the role of industrial sector’s electricity consumption, prices, and GDP: A modified empirical evidence from Pakistan. AIMS Energy 2021, 9, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daci, J. Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Acad. Int. Sci. J. 2014, 9, 54–67. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, L.; Chao, A. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Growth, and Energy Policy in China. Energies 2018, 11, 3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Golob, U.; Podnar, K.; Koklič, M.K.; Zabkar, V. The importance of corporate social responsibility for responsible consumption: Exploring moral motivations of consumers. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, J.; Zhang, Q.; Hussain, I.; Akram, S.; Afaq, A.; Shad, M.A. Sustainable Innovation in Small Medium Enterprises: The Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Innovation through a Mediation Analysis by Using SEM Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, W.; Wei, Q.; Huang, S.-Q.; Tsai, S.-B. Doing Good Again? A Multilevel Institutional Perspective on Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Philanthropic Strategy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bombiak, E. Green human resource management—The latest trend or strategic necessity? Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2019, 6, 1647–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moisescu, O.-I.; Gică, O.-A. The Impact of Environmental and Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: A Multigroup Analysis among Generations X and Y. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rela, I.Z.; Awang, A.H.; Ramli, Z.; Sum, S.M.; Meisanti, M. Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental well-being perception and the mediation role of community resilience. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 2176–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rorrer, A.S.; Moghadam, S.H.; Spencer, B.; Sun, T. eCSR: Creating Intensive Research Experiences that Cultivate Community for Undergraduate Women & Women of Color. In Proceedings of the 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Portland, OR, USA, 10–11 March 2020; Volume 1, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Cuesta-Valiño, P.; Rodríguez, P.G.; Núñez-Barriopedro, E. The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty in hypermarkets: A new socially responsible strategy. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filbee-Dexter, K.; Pittman, J.; Haig, H.A.; Alexander, S.M.; Symons, C.C.; Burke, M.J. Ecological surprise: Concept, synthesis, and social dimensions. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e02005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deutz, P. Producer responsibility in a sustainable development context: Ecological modernisation or industrial ecology? Geogr. J. 2009, 175, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, M.; Darnton, G. Green Companies or Green Con-panies: Are Companies Really Green, or Are They Pretending to Be? Bus. Soc. Rev. 2005, 110, 117–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, K.R.; Abbas, J.; Tufail, M. Revisiting electricity consumption, price, and real GDP: A modified sectoral level analysis from Pakistan. Energy Policy 2021, 149, 112087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Lho, L.H.; Al-Ansi, A.; Ryu, H.B.; Park, J.; Kim, W. Factors Triggering Customer Willingness to Travel on Environmentally Responsible Electric Airplanes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ming, H.; Xia, B.; Lee, K.-Y.; Adepoju, A.; Shakkottai, S.; Xie, L. Prediction and assessment of demand response potential with coupon incentives in highly renewable power systems. Prot. Control. Mod. Power Syst. 2020, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathevet, R.; Bousquet, F.; Larrère, C.; Larrère, R. Environmental Stewardship and Ecological Solidarity: Rethinking Social-Ecological Interdependency and Responsibility. J. Agric. Environ. Ethic. 2018, 31, 605–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhu, T.; Yao, H.; Sun, Q. The Impact of Green Information on the Participation Intention of Consumers in Online Recycling: An Experimental Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paliwoda-Matiolańska, A. Odpowiedzialność Społeczna w Procesie Zarządzania Przedsiębiorstwem; C.H. Beck: Warszawa, Poland, 2009; pp. 111–112. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Ren, L.; Qiao, J.; Yao, S.; Striełkowski, W.; Sreimikis, J. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption: Implications for the Sustainable Energy Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leon, P.; Moon, S.G. Contexts and corporate voluntary environmental behaviors: Examining the EPA’s green lights voluntary program. Organ. Environ. 2007, 20, 480–496. [Google Scholar]
- Baxter, P.; Jack, S. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. Qual. Rep. 2015, 13, 544–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper. 2021. Available online: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/casestudy (accessed on 21 March 2021).
- Guenther, E.; Hoppe, H.; Poser, C. Environmental corporate social responsibility of firms in the mining and oil and gas industries: Current status quo of reporting following GRI guidelines. Green. Manag. Int. 2007, 53, 7–25. [Google Scholar]
- Jose, A.; Lee, S.-M. Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. J. Bus. Ethic. 2006, 72, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peattie, K. Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge; Pitman Publishing: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Punte, S.; Repinski, P.; Gabrielsson, S. Improving Energy Efficiency in Asia’s Industry. Greener Manag. Int. 2005, 2005, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christmann, P. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Acad. Manag. J. 2004, 47, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carroll, A.B. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Resposibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Bus. Horiz. 1991, 34, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochran, P.L. The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Bus. Horiz. 2007, 50, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maimunah, I. Corporate Social Responsibility and its Role in Community Development: An International Perspective. J. Int. Soc. Res. 2009, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Pacana, A.; Andrzej Gazda, A.; Bednárová, L. The impact of quality information on innovatory environment of the public administration. Int. J. Interdiscip. Theory Pract. 2014, 4, 25–26. [Google Scholar]
- Laskurain, I.; Ibarloza, A.; Larrea, A.; Allur, E. Contribution to Energy Management of the Main Standards for Environmental Management Systems: The Case of ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies 2017, 10, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zobel, T.; Malmgren, C. Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements. Energies 2016, 9, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koya, N.; Hurst, B.; Roper, J. In whose interests? When relational engagement to obtain a social license leads to paradoxical outcomes. Public Relat. Rev. 2021, 47, 101987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, G.; Pekyi, G.; Chen, H.; Sun, H.; Wang, X. Sustainability-Conscious Stakeholders and CSR: Evidence from IJVs of Ghana. Sustainability 2021, 13, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, S. Evaluation of Definitions: Ten Dimensions of Corporate Social Resposibility. World Rev. Bus. Res. 2011, 1, 166–176. [Google Scholar]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cyfert, S.; Glabiszewski, W.; Zastempowski, M. Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z. Energies 2021, 14, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milojević, M.; Urbański, M.; Terzić, I.; Prasolov, V. Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Effectiveness of Audits in Energy Companies. Energies 2020, 13, 6212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, A.; Noreen, U.; Azam, A.; Tahir, M.S. Does CSR Governance Improve Social Sustainability and Reduce the Carbon Footprint: International Evidence from the Energy Sector. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.B.; Hassan, M.R.; Tarique, K.M. Three Dimensional Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility. Daffodil Int. Univ. J. Bus. Econ. 2008, 3, 200–212. [Google Scholar]
- Rubczyński, A. Czyste Ciepło 2030. Strategia dla Ciepłownictwa, Izba Gospodarcza Ciepłownictwo Polskie; Euro-Media Sp. z o.o.: Warszawa, Poland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Communication from the Commission—The Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme: Towards a Thematic Strategy for Air Quality, COM/2001/0245 Final. 2001. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52001DC0245 (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- National Emissions Ceilings (NEC) Directive (2016/2284/EU). 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.344.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2016:344:TOC (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Directive 2010/75/EU on Industrial Emissions (IED). 2010. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0075 (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Medium Combustion Plant Directive (MCPD), (EU) 2015/2193. 2015. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32015L2193 (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Meseguer-Sánchez, V.; Gálvez-Sánchez, F.J.; López-Martínez, G.; Molina-Moreno, V. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability. A Bibliometric Analysis of Their Interrelations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seroka-Stolka, O. Environmantal Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) in Polish Food Sector Enterprises from Czestochowa region—Empirical Analysis, Scientific Papers, Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce; Agroinform Publishing House: Budapest, Hungary, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Korea District Heating Corporation. Happy Life with You. An Energy Leader Realizing Social Values; Korea District Heating Corporation: Bundang-ro, Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Saniuk, S.; Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B. Social Expectations and Market Changes in the Context of Developing the Industry 4.0 Concept. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- An EU Strategy on Heating and Cooling, European Commission, Brussels. 2016. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v14.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Ashour, M.L.; Ali, N.N.; Allan, M.S. Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Relationships and mechanisms. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Adm. 2020, 8, 161–175. [Google Scholar]
- Moratis, L.; Van Egmond, M. Concealing social responsibility? Investigating the relationship between CSR, earnings management and the effect of industry through quantitative analysis. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2018, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pacana, A.; Ulewicz, R. Analysis of causes and effects of implementation of the quality management system complaint with ISO 9001. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 21, 283–296. [Google Scholar]
- Ozordi, E.; Uwalomwa, U.; Obarakpo, T.; Ikumapayi, T.; Gbenedio, A.E. Corporate diversity and corporate social environmental disclosure of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2018, 16, 229–244. [Google Scholar]
Area | Activity | Objective |
---|---|---|
Designing |
| To build a designing/organisational potential (resources) allowing the implementation of pro-environment solutions in the organisation, including service quality excellence and improvement of ecological awareness within the social responsibility framework. |
Operations/production |
|
|
Sales/purchasing | Building adequate (according to internal policies) relations with stakeholders, including in the area of ecological aspects. |
|
Marketing |
|
|
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Educational projects related to environmental protection |
|
|
|
|
Environment-oriented promotional campaigns (leaflets, films, articles, sign boards, etc.)—up to 20 publications in local media (magazines/newspapers, TV stations, web portals) |
|
|
|
|
Sponsoring activity related to environmental protection (e.g., children contest awards—quantities and sums) |
|
|
|
|
Actions enhancing the community (details, quantities, periods, sums) |
|
|
|
|
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ISO 14001:2015 | Implemented an integrated management systemPLN 24,450 | Periodic auditPLN 11,200 | Periodic auditPLN 11,200 | Re-certification 30% incurred in 2020 (PLN 7155)The rest will be incurred in 2021. |
Environmental protection training | PLN 1800 | PLN 8400 | PLN 5600 | PLN 150 |
Staff promotion | PLN 7678 | PLN 8243 | PLN 2020 | PLN 0 |
Total | PLN 33,928 | PLN 27,843 | PLN 18,820 | PLN 7305 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wolniak, R.; Wyszomirski, A.; Olkiewicz, M.; Olkiewicz, A. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study. Energies 2021, 14, 1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071930
Wolniak R, Wyszomirski A, Olkiewicz M, Olkiewicz A. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study. Energies. 2021; 14(7):1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071930
Chicago/Turabian StyleWolniak, Radosław, Adam Wyszomirski, Marcin Olkiewicz, and Anna Olkiewicz. 2021. "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study" Energies 14, no. 7: 1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071930
APA StyleWolniak, R., Wyszomirski, A., Olkiewicz, M., & Olkiewicz, A. (2021). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study. Energies, 14(7), 1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071930