Next Article in Journal
Distributed Volt-Var Curve Optimization Using a Cellular Computational Network Representation of an Electric Power Distribution System
Next Article in Special Issue
Membrane Electrode Assembly Degradation Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Developing Countries in the Lead: A Bibliometric Approach to Green Finance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Performance of a Cylindrical Lithium-Ion Battery Module Cooled by Two-Phase Refrigerant Circulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnéli TiO2 as a High Durability Support for the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Catalysts

Energy and Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(12), 4437; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124437
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Electrochemical Energy System)

Abstract

:
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) cathode catalysts’ robustness is one of the primary factors determining its long-term performance and durability. This work presented a new class of corrosion-resistant catalyst, Magnél TiO2 supported Pt (Pt/Ti9O17) composite, synthesized. The durability of a Pt/Ti9O17 cathode under the PEMFC operating protocol was evaluated and compared with the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. Like Pt/C, Pt/Ti9O17 exhibited exclusively 4e oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in the acidic solution. The accelerated stress tests (AST) were performed using Pt/Ti9O17 and Pt/C catalysts in an O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution using the potential-steps cycling experiments from 0.95 V to 0.6 V for 12,000 cycles. The results indicated that the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of the Pt/Ti9O17 is significantly more stable than that of the state-of-the-art Pt/C, and the ECSA loss after 12,000 potential cycles is only 10 ± 2% for Pt/Ti9O17 composite versus 50 ± 5% for Pt/C. Furthermore, the current density and onset potential at the ORR polarization curve at Pt/C were significantly affected by the AST test. In contrast, the same remained almost constant at the modified electrode, Pt/Ti9O17. This demonstrated the excellent stability of Pt nanoparticles supported on Ti9O17.

1. Introduction

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have drawn much attention as a promising energy conversion technology due to their higher conversion efficiency, higher power density, higher current density, and quick startup [1,2]. Among PEMFCs, the high-temperature fuel cell is considered a next-generation technology as it has several advantages at an operating temperature of more than 90 °C [3,4] There are several advantages to operating at a higher temperature a: (i) promoting faster reaction kinetics, especially for the four-electron reduction process at the cathode; (ii) better contamination tolerance; (iii) efficient water control; and (iv) easier straightforward injection. Unfortunately, the catalyst durability is a critical challenge that must be addressed for PEMFC’s widespread commercialization since it directly reflects the life and cost of PEMFC’s power-generation systems [5]. Carbon black has been the commonly used catalyst support material due to its low cost, high surface area, and availability [6,7,8]. Although catalyst degradation could result from many factors t, the primary contributors are believed to be (i) the dissolution and re-deposition (Ostwald ripening) of Pt, (ii) coalescence via crystal migration, and (iii) detachment of Pt particles from the catalyst support [9]. Among these, Pt detachment results through catalyst support corrosion. Conventional carbon blacks, such as Vulcan XC72R, are superior catalyst-support materials because of their cost and physicochemical properties. However, carbon is unstable under the cathodic operation in a PEMFC based on its thermodynamic considerations.
C + H2O = CO2 + 2H+ + 2e E0 = 0.207 V vs. RHE
In order to resolve the issue of carbon support corrosion, several extensive studies have been conducted on adopting materials with high corrosion resistance, including carbon, with a greater degree of graphitization. Several other types of carbon-based materials have been studied, including nanofiber, nanotube, nano-diamond, graphene, and mesoporous structure [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Although carbon with a higher graphitization degree has higher corrosion resistance versus carbon black, it is still inadequate to mitigate its corrosion under long-term operation due to its intrinsic carbon composition. Therefore, to improve PEMFCs catalyst support stability, considerable work has been done over the past few decades on non-carbon support materials [19,20,21,22,23,24], including oxides, carbides, and nitrides. However, the improvements are insufficient to prevent performance loss under highly oxidative conditions during automotive start-stop cycles. Among the non-carbon support materials, the following basic criteria should be considered for the improvement of fuel cell activity and durability that includes the high surface area, high corrosion resistance in extreme operating conditions, like under dry or humid environments, a higher resistance in acidic or alkaline media, high conductivity and excellent electrochemical stability [25,26]. The strong physiochemical interaction of supporting materials with the element is highly desirable to improve catalytic activity and stability.
In this work, we have focused on sub-stoichiometric titanium oxide (TinO2n−1), which is a Magnéli phase of TiO2 (M-TiO2), to improve the durability of requirements of the automotive application. The electron conductivity of MTiO2 obtained by thermally treating TiO2 in a reducing environment is similar to that of activated carbon [27]. Moreover, chemically inert M-TiO2 materials have remarkably high electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance [27]. These excellent properties of M-TiO2 translate it as an excellent candidate for catalyst support for Pt-based catalysts in the PEMFCs [27].
In this study, Ti9O17 was synthesized as M-TiO2 and then used as catalyst support for Pt catalyst. The activity of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) of synthesized catalyst was evaluated using O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution, and the stability was evaluated using AST protocol via stop-start cycle over 12,000 cycles. The catalyst support needs to demonstrate <30% degradation to be eligible to use in automotive applications. Ti9O17 support Pt showed excellent activity and stability towards ORR. The ORR activity and stability of the synthesized Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst were compared with the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Pt/C catalyst (20% Pt loading) was purchased from the Fuel Cell Store. Titanium (IV) oxide, anatase (99.7% metal basis), and Pt nanoparticle (~30 nm) were procured from Aldrich. The analytical grade purity materials were used in this study without further purification.

2.2. Catalyst Synthesis and Electrode Preparation

2.2.1. Synthesis of Ti9O17

Ti9O17 as a support material for PEMFC catalyst was synthesized as follows: 0.45 g of anatase TiO2 was dispersed in 20 mL of ethanol; the solution was stirred for 80 min. Afterward, the solvent was evaporated at 70 °C with continuous stirring. Finally, the material was reduced at 1050 °C in the mixture of 5% H2 and 95% N2 for 5 h. The obtained solid was noted as Ti9O17

2.2.2. Synthesis of 30% Pt/Ti9O17

The Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst was prepared as follows: 105.9 mg of Ti9O17 and 45.4 mg of Pt nanoparticle (~30 nm) were mechanically mixed with a pestle and mortar. Then, transferred into a ceramic boat and treated in an inert atmosphere at 400 °C for 3 h. Thus, the obtained solid was noted as Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst.

2.2.3. Electrode Preparation

Glassy carbon (GC) rotating disk electrodes (RDEs) with 5 mm diameter were used as a working electrode. Before each experiment, the working electrode was polished to a mirror finish with 0.05 μm alumina suspensions and served as an underlying conductive substrate of the working electrode.

Pt /Ti9O17 (30%) Electrode

10.0 mg Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst was dispersed ultrasonically in a 1.0 mL mixture of isopropyl alcohol (IPA), water, and 5% Nafion solution (686, 294, and 20 µL, respectively) to prepare the catalyst ink. The dispersion was ultrasonicated for 30 min. A total of 10 μL of the dispersed ink was pipetted out and carefully coated on the top of the RDE. The catalyst layer was dried at room temperature. Thus prepared electrode was dried first at room temperature and then heated in an oven at 130 °C for 30 min in the presence of air. The Pt catalyst loading of the thus prepared electrode was calculated as 0.168 mg/cm2.

Pt/C (20%) Electrode

The catalyst ink with Pt/C was prepared in the same way described above. In short, 10.0 mg of Pt/C was dispersed in 1.0 mL of a mixture of the solution, and 15 μL of the dispersion was pipetted out and carefully coated on the top of the GC to get the same amount of Pt loading (0.168 mg/cm2).

2.3. Surface Characterizations

Powder X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) of the catalyst was performed on an X-ray diffractometer (Smartlab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The diffractometer was operated at 40 kV and 44 mA using Cu Kα radiation at a 4°/min scan rate from 10–80°. The energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer-assisted field-mission scanning electron microscopy (FEI Quanta 650 FEG SEM) was used for analyzing particle morphology and element composition.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

0.5 M H2SO4 solution was used as an electrolyte for the electrochemical characterizations with the electrode immersed in the 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. Before each electrochemical measurement, the electrolyte solution was purged for 15 min with N2 gas. The RDE voltammetric measurements were carried out using the PINE Rotating Electrode speed controller in an O2-saturated solution and recorded at various rotation rates during the ORR study. All currents measured during the experiments were normalized by the geometric surface area of the electrode to current densities.

2.5. Accelerated Stress Test (AST) via Start-Stop Cycles

The stability of the PEMFC catalyst support is usually evaluated through the AST start-stop cycles developed by Nissan. The AST cycle involved a square wave from 0.6 V to 0.95 V with a 3 s dwell time at each potential [28]. The stability of catalysts (Pt/C and Pt/Ti9O17) is evaluated for 12,000 cycles according to the protocol scheme shown in Figure 1. In the protocol, initial CVs were performed in 0.5 M H2SO4 saturated with N2 gas followed by ORR stability for 12,000 cycles, ORR at O2saturated, and finally CVs again in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution saturated with N2 gas.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a illustrates the XRD patterns of the Ti9O17 with standard reference spectra of Ti9O17. The Magnéli titania phases found in the XRD analysis were mainly Ti9O17 [29,30]. The synthesized Ti9O17 was found to be crystalline, and the crystallite size was calculated using the Scherer equation from the XRD diffraction peak width [31]:
L = K λ β cos θ
where L is the particle size, K is a constant, normally taken as 0.9; λ is the X-ray wavelength in nanometer (0.15418 nm) and β is the peak width of the diffraction peak profile at half maximum height in radians. The crystallite size was calculated as 31 nm.
Figure 2b,c shows the SEM images of Ti9O17 and Pt/Ti9O17, respectively. As seen from these figures, there is no significant difference in the morphology and distribution of Ti9O17 and Pt/Ti9O17. The Pt nanoparticles are evenly distributed on the Ti9O17 surface.
The EDX pattern of the Ti9O17 and Pt/Ti9O17 electrocatalyst (Figure 2d,e, respectively) clearly shows an elemental characteristic of the catalyst surface, that is, the presence of Ti, O, C in the Ti9O17 sample and Pt, Ti, O, C in the Pt/Ti9O17 sample.
Electrochemical surface-active area (ECSA). Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammogram (CV) obtained for the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalysts and experimental Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst in an N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution.
A characteristic CV response expected for the Pt electrode is obtained for both the Pt/C and Pt/Ti9O17 electrocatalysts (Figure 3) corresponding to the hydrogen adsorption-desorption and the oxide layer formation and its reduction. The ECSA is calculated from the coulombic charges measured during the hydrogen oxidation step after correcting for double layer charging current using the following equation:
ECSA = Q H 0.21
where ECSA is the electrochemical active surface area in cm2, QH (mC) is the charge from the oxidation of adsorbed hydrogen in the hydrogen region of the CVs, 0.21 mC/cm2 is the electrical charge associated with monolayer adsorption of hydrogen on Pt. The ECSA of Pt/Ti9O17 and Pt/C are calculated as 1.02 and 0.33 cm2, respectively. The specific ECSA of the Pt/Ti9O17 and Pt/C are further calculated and obtained as 10.2 and 5.04 m2/g, respectively.
An RDE voltammetric technique is extremely useful in evaluating the catalytic activity of electrocatalysts for ORR. Figure 4 illustrates hydrodynamic voltammograms obtained for the ORR at the state-of-the-art Pt/C or Pt/Ti9O17 -modified electrodes at different rotation rates speed of 400–2000 rpm in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1.
The transferred electron number per oxygen molecule involved in the ORR at the Pt/C and Pt/Ti9O17 electrocatalysts was determined by the Kouteckey-Levich equation (Equation (4) in which iL is the Levich current and is expressed by Equation (5))
1 i l = 1 i k + 1 i L
i L = 0.62 n F A D O 2 2 / 3 ν 1 / 6 C O 2 ω 1 / 2
where n is the number of electrons transferred per oxygen molecule, F is the Faraday constant (96,485 C mol−1), A is a geometric area of the electrode (0.196 cm2), DO2 is the diffusion coefficient of O2 (1.93 × 10−5 cm2 s−1), v is the kinetic viscosity of the solution (1.009 × 10−2 cm2 s−1), and CO2 is the concentration of dissolved O2 in solution (1.26 × 10−3 mol L−1) [32].
As shown in Figure 4c,d, the Kouteckey–Levich plots of il−1 versus ω−1/2 at various potentials for the voltammograms of Figure 4a,b gave the straight lines the slopes that are equal to that expected for four-electron ORR, and the values of n were found to be 3.98 and 3.94 for the Pt/C, and Pt/Ti9O17 electrocatalysts, respectively.
The AST of catalysts was performed and shown in Figure 5. Pt/Ti9O17 was exposed to an accelerated stability test which consists of 12,000 potential cycles in an O2-saturated solution and was compared to the state-of-the-art Pt/C (Figure 4a,b). In Figure 5a, the current remains almost constant even after 12,000 cycles of degradation indicating the enhanced stability of the catalyst. However, the current significantly decreases with a time of stability testing in the state-of-the-art Pt/C, indicating degradation of catalyst (Figure 5b). The catalyst degradation is evaluated by comparing ORR polarization curves at 1200 rpm and cyclic voltammetry at N2saturated H2SO4 solution. The onset potential of ORR at Pt/Ti9O17 (Figure 5c) remains the same before and after the stability. In contrast, the onset potential at Pt/C (Figure 5d) shifted to higher reductive potential after stability confirming the degradation at Pt/C. Furthermore, Figure 5d shows a limiting current being decreased at Pt/C after stability testing, whereas the diffusion-limited current density of Pt/Ti9O17 in Figure 5c remains unchanged. Platinum dissolution and agglomeration are well-known degradation paths leading to such effects at Pt/C, which suggested carbon itself is not a perfect support material. On the other hand, less than 10 ± 2.5% degradation ORR performance is observed, indicating a good and alternative support material for Pt in PEMFC application. Further analysis of catalyst degradation is carried out by comparing CVs and ECSA of catalysts before and after the stability study. The CVs obtained at Pt/Ti9O17 (Figure 5e) were identical when compared with the before and after 12,000 cycles of degradation, whereas a significant difference in CVs was obtained before and after stability at Pt/C (Figure 5f). The indications of catalyst degradation become apparent by calculating the electroactive Pt surface. Figure 6 compares the ECSA losses for both catalysts. The ECSA decreased at Pt/Ti9O17 by 10 ± 2% whereas at Pt/C by almost 50 ± 5% from the initial values. Thus, the decrease of ECSA at the state-of-the-art Pt/C indicates the least stable catalyst during PEMFC operating conditions.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we have successfully synthesized a highly stable and corrosion-resistant Magnéli phase titania (Ti9O17) as a support for the Pt electrocatalyst for PEMFC. Like Pt/C, Pt/Ti9O17 exhibits the 4e ORR process in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4. The durability of a Pt/Ti9O17 under the PEMFC operating protocol was evaluated and compared to those of the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. After 12,000 potential cycles, the Pt/Ti9O17 retained 90 ± 2% of its ECSA, while the state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst retained only 50 ± 5% of its ECSA. In addition, the comparison of ORR polarization curves before and after the AST study also supports the excellent stability of the synthesized catalyst. These results indicate that the Pt/Ti9O17 exhibits significantly higher durability due to the fabricated support material of its higher corrosion resistance property.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T.; Funding acquisition, J.T.; Investigation, J.M.; Methodology, J.T. and J.M.; Project administration, J.T.; Supervision, J.T.; Writing—original draft, J.M.; Writing—review & editing, J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The present work was financially supported by The UND Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development (VPRED).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ning, F.; He, X.; Shen, Y.; Jin, H.; Li, Q.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Zhan, Y.; Du, Y.; Jiang, J.; et al. Flexible and Lightweight Fuel Cell with High Specific Power Density. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5982–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, D.; Peng, C.; Yin, C. Review of System Integration and Control of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2020, 3, 466–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scheepers, F.; Stähler, M.; Stähler, A.; Rauls, E.; Müller, M.; Carmo, M.; Lehnert, W. Temperature optimization for improving polymer electrolyte membrane-water electrolysis system efficiency. Appl. Energy 2021, 283, 116270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lochner, T.; Kluge, R.M.; Fichtner, J.; El-Sayed, H.A.; Garlyyev, B.; Bandarenka, A.S. Temperature Effects in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Firouzjaie, H.A.; Mustain, W.E. Catalytic Advantages, Challenges, and Priorities in Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cells. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ren, X.; Lv, Q.; Liu, L.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, A.; Wu, G. Current progress of Pt and Pt-based electrocatalysts used for fuel cells. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, W.; Bera, S.; Kim, C.M.; Koh, E.K.; Hong, W.P.; Oh, S.J.; Cho, E.A.; Kwon, S.H. Synthesis of highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles into carbon supports by fluidized bed reactor atomic layer deposition to boost PEMFC performance. NPG Asia Mater. 2020, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antolini, E. Carbon supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 88, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kharwar, Y.P.; Akula, S.; Sahu, A.K.; Ramanujam, K. Highly Durable Pt-Based Catalyst Supported on Carbon Derived from Tamarind Seeds for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in PEM Fuel Cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 104515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, C.; Xiao, Y.; Zou, Y.; Dai, L. Carbon-Based Metal-Free Electrocatalysis for Energy Conversion, Energy Storage, and Environmental Protection. Electrochem. Energ. Rev. 2018, 1, 84–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jha, N.; Reddy, A.L.M.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Rajalakshmi, N.; Ramaprabhu, S. Pt–Ru/multiwalled carbon nanotubes as electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gribov, E.N.; Kuznetsov, A.N.; Golovin, V.A.; Krasnikov, D.V.; Kuznetsov, V.L. Effect of modification of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with nitrogen-containing polymers on the electrochemical performance of Pt/CNT catalysts in PEMFC. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2019, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Karuppannan, M.; Kim, Y.; Gok, S.; Lee, E.; Hwang, J.Y.; Jang, J.H.; Cho, Y.H.; Lim, T.; Sung, Y.E.; Kwon, O.J. A highly durable carbon-nanofiber-supported Pt–C core–shell cathode catalyst for ultra-low Pt loading proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Facile carbon encapsulation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2820–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zang, J.; Wang, Y.; Bian, L.; Zhang, J.; Meng, F.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, R.; Qu, X.; Ren, S. Graphene growth on nanodiamond as a support for a Pt electrocatalyst in methanol electrooxidation. Carbon 2012, 50, 3032–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jafri, R.I.; Rajalakshmi, N.; Ramaprabhu, S. Nitrogen doped graphene nanoplatelets as catalyst support for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7114–7117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ganyecz, Á.; Kállay, M. Oxygen Reduction Reaction on N-Doped Graphene: Effect of Positions and Scaling Relations of Adsorption Energies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 8551–8561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ding, J.; Chan, K.Y.; Ren, J.; Xiao, F.S. Platinum and platinum-ruthenium nanoparticles supported on ordered mesoporous carbon and their electrocatalytic performance for fuel cell reactions. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 3131–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xu, H.; Tian, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhong, H.; Liang, Y.; Yi, B. Microporous layer with composite carbon black for PEM fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 49094915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Lia, J.; Wei, Z. Transition-metal-oxide-based catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 8194–8209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Kelly, T.G.; Chen, J.G.; Mustain, W.E. Metal Carbides as Alternative Electrocatalyst Supports. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1184–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Wilkinson, D.P.; Zhang, J. Recent Progresses in Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysts for Electrochemical Energy Applications. Electrochem. Energ. Rev. 2019, 2, 518–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, Y.J.; Wilkinson, P.D.; Zhang, J. Noncarbon Support Materials for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7625–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, S.H.; Ganesan, P.; Park, S.; Popov, B.N. Development of a Titanium DioxideSupported Platinum Catalyst with Ultrahigh Stability for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13898–13899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duma, A.D.; Wu, Y.C.; Su, W.N.; Pan, C.J.; Tsai, M.C.; Chen, H.M.; Lee, J.F.; Sheu, H.S.; Ho, V.T.T.; Hwang, B.J. In Situ Confined Synthesis of Ti4O7 Supported Platinum Electrocatalysts with Enhanced Activity and Stability for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shao, Y.; Yin, G.; Gao, Y. Understanding and approaches for the durability issues of Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2007, 171, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stevens, D.A.; Hicks, M.T.; Haugen, G.M.; Dahn, J.R. Ex Situ and In Situ Stability Studies of PEMFC Catalysts: Effect of Carbon Type and Humidification on Degradation of the Carbon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arif, A.F.; Balgis, R.; Ogi, T.; Iskandar, F.; Kinoshita, A.; Nakamura, K.; Okuyama, K. Highly conductive nano-sized Magnéli phases titanium oxide (TiOx). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Masud, J.; Thakare, J.; Aulich, T.; Mann, M.; Zhao, J.X. Magnéli Phase Ti9O17− Catalyst Support Materials for ORR. In ECS Meeting Abstracts; MA2020-02 2849; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Stariha, S.; Macauley, N.; Sneed, B.T.; Langlois, D.; More, K.L.; Mukundan, R.; Borup, R.L. Recent Advances in Catalyst Accelerated Stress Tests for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, F492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ishida, Y.; Doshin, W.; Tsukamoto, H.; Yonezawa, T. Black TiO2 Nanoparticles by a Microwave-induced Plasma over Titanium Complex Aqueous Solution. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 1327–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masud, J.; Nguyen, T.V.; Singh, N.; McFarland, E.; Ikenberry, M.; Hohn, K.; Pan, C.J.; Hwang, B.J. A RhxSy/C Catalyst for the Hydrogen Oxidation and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions in HBr. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, F455–F462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Masud, J.; Nath, M. Co7Se8 Nanostructures as Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction with High Methanol Tolerance. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. AST protocol scheme for PEM fuel cell catalyst evaluation.
Figure 1. AST protocol scheme for PEM fuel cell catalyst evaluation.
Energies 15 04437 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD spectra of Ti9O17 along with a reference (ICSD # 035124) spectrum. SEM images of (b) Ti9O17 and (c) Pt/Ti9O17. EDS spectra of (d) Ti9O17 and (e) Pt/Ti9O17.
Figure 2. (a) XRD spectra of Ti9O17 along with a reference (ICSD # 035124) spectrum. SEM images of (b) Ti9O17 and (c) Pt/Ti9O17. EDS spectra of (d) Ti9O17 and (e) Pt/Ti9O17.
Energies 15 04437 g002
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammogram (CV) obtained using the rotating disk electrodes with (a) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (b) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s−1.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammogram (CV) obtained using the rotating disk electrodes with (a) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (b) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst in N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at a scan rate of 25 mV s−1.
Energies 15 04437 g003
Figure 4. Hydrodynamic voltammograms obtained at the disk electrodes coated with (a) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (b) Pt/Ti9O17 catalysts in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at scan rate of 10 mV s−1 at various rotation rates of 400 to 2000 rpm. Koutecky–Levich plots at various potentials obtained with (c) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (d) Pt/Ti9O17.
Figure 4. Hydrodynamic voltammograms obtained at the disk electrodes coated with (a) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (b) Pt/Ti9O17 catalysts in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at scan rate of 10 mV s−1 at various rotation rates of 400 to 2000 rpm. Koutecky–Levich plots at various potentials obtained with (c) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and (d) Pt/Ti9O17.
Energies 15 04437 g004
Figure 5. AST studies obtained using the rotating disk electrodes with (a) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (b) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst carried out in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. Comparison of ORR polarization curves at (c) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (d) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. Comparison of CVs at (e) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (f) state‒of‒the‒art Pt/C catalyst before and after stability test.
Figure 5. AST studies obtained using the rotating disk electrodes with (a) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (b) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst carried out in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. Comparison of ORR polarization curves at (c) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (d) state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. Comparison of CVs at (e) Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst and (f) state‒of‒the‒art Pt/C catalyst before and after stability test.
Energies 15 04437 g005
Figure 6. The ECSA before and after stability for state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst.
Figure 6. The ECSA before and after stability for state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst and Pt/Ti9O17 catalyst.
Energies 15 04437 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thakare, J.; Masud, J. Magnéli TiO2 as a High Durability Support for the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Catalysts. Energies 2022, 15, 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124437

AMA Style

Thakare J, Masud J. Magnéli TiO2 as a High Durability Support for the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Catalysts. Energies. 2022; 15(12):4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thakare, Jivan, and Jahangir Masud. 2022. "Magnéli TiO2 as a High Durability Support for the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Catalysts" Energies 15, no. 12: 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124437

APA Style

Thakare, J., & Masud, J. (2022). Magnéli TiO2 as a High Durability Support for the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Catalysts. Energies, 15(12), 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop