Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects
1. Introduction
2. A Short Review of the Contributions in This Issue
3. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rees, W.E. Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 59, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dreher, A. Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl. Econ. 2006, 38, 1091–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Skare, M.; Porada-Rochoń, M. Financial and economic development link in transitional economies: A spectral Granger causality analysis 1991–2017. Oecon. Copernic. 2019, 10, 7–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajdos, A.; Arendt, L.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B. Future trends of labour market polarisation in Poland. Perspect. Trans. Bus. Econ. 2020, 19, 114–135. [Google Scholar]
- Jankiewicz, M.; Pietrzak, M.B. Assessment of trends in the share of expenditure on services and food in the Visegrad Group member states. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2020, 21, 977–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piekut, M. Patterns of energy consumption in Polish one-person households. Energies 2020, 13, 5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szopik-Depczyńska, K.; Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, A.; Szczepaniak, K.; Cheba, K.; Gajda, W.; Ioppolo, G. Innovation in sustainable development: An investigation of the EU context using 2030 agenda indicators. Land Use Policy 2018, 79, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, P. Cooperation of enterprises in innovative activities on the example of Polish regions. Equilib. Quart. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2021, 16, 839–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E.; Grzelak, M.M. Macroeconomic stability and the level of competitiveness in EU member states: A comparative dynamic approach. Oeconomia Copernic. 2022, 11, 657–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szopik-Depczynska, K.; Cheba, K.; Bąk, I.; Stajniak, M.; Simboli, A.; Ioppolo, G. The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 90, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balcerzak, A.P. Quality of institutions in the European Union countries. Application of TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2020, 17, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 140, 16–62. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, M.-X.; Liou, H.M.; Chou, K.T. National energy transition framework toward SDG7 with legal reforms and policy bundles: The case of Taiwan and its comparison with Japan. Energies 2020, 13, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pietrzak, M.B.; Igliński, B.; Kujawski, W.; Iwański, P. Energy transition in Poland—assessment of the renewable energy sector. Energies 2021, 14, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strat. Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chovancová, J.; Tej, J. Decoupling economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions: The case of the energy sector in V4 countries. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosse, T.G. Low carbon economy policy in Poland: An example of the impact of europeanisation. Equilib. Quart. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2011, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheba, K.; Bąk, I. Environmental production efficiency in the European Union countries as a tool for the implementation of goal 7 of the 2030 agenda. Energies 2021, 14, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kludacz-Alessandri, M.; Cygańska, M. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance among energy sector companies. Energies 2021, 14, 6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stritzke, S.; Jain, P. The sustainability of decentralised renewable energy projects in developing countries: Learning lessons from Zambia. Energies 2021, 14, 3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piekut, M. The consumption of renewable energy sources (RES) by the European Union households between 2004 and 2019. Energies 2021, 14, 5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matuszewska-Janica, A.; Żebrowska-Suchodolska, D.; Ala-Karvia, U.; Hozer-Koćmiel, M. Changes in electricity production from renewable energy sources in the European Union countries in 2005–2019. Energies 2021, 14, 6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wałachowska, A.; Ignasiak-Szulc, A. Comparison of renewable energy sources in ‘New’ EU Member States in the context of national energy transformations. Energies 2021, 14, 7963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senkus, P.; Glabiszewski, W.; Wysokińska-Senkus, A.; Cyfert, S.; Batko, R. The potential of ecological distributed energy generation systems, situation, and perspective for Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 7966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huterski, R.; Huterska, A.; Zdunek-Rosa, E.; Voss, G. Evaluation of the level of electricity generation from renewable energy sources in European Union countries. Energies 2021, 14, 8150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ključnikov, A.; Civelek, M.; Fialova, V.; Folvarčná, A. Organizational, local, and global innovativeness of family-owned SMEs depending on firm-individual level characteristics: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Equilib. Quart. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2021, 16, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prokop, V.; Kotkova Striteska, M.; Stejskal, J. Fostering Czech firms? innovation performance through efficient cooperation. Oecon. Copernic. 2021, 12, 671–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, J.; Simmons, E.; Convery, I.; Weatherall, A. Public perceptions of community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4217–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zoellner, J.; Schweizer-Ries, P.; Wemheuer, C. Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4136–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igliński, B.; Flisikowski, K.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Kiełkowska, U.; Skrzatek, M.; Zyadin, A.; Natarajan, K. Renewable energy in the Pomerania Voivodeship—institutional, economic, environmental and physical aspects in light of EU energy transformation. Energies 2021, 14, 8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igliński, B.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Kiełkowska, U.; Skrzatek, M.; Gajdos, A.; Zyadin, A.; Natarajan, K. How to meet the Green Deal objectives—is it possible to obtain 100% RES at the regional level in the EU? Energies 2022, 15, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidełko, R. Application of technological processes to create a unitary model for energy recovery from municipal waste. Energies 2021, 14, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydin, O.; Igliński, B.; Krukowski, K.; Siemiński, M. Analyzing wind energy potential using efficient global optimization: A case study for the city Gdańsk in Poland. Energies 2022, 15, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurowska-Pysz, J.; Kunikowski, G. The ESCO formula as support for public and commercial energy projects in Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smagowicz, J.; Szwed, C.; Dąbal, D.; Scholz, P. A simulation model of power demand management by manufacturing enterprises under the conditions of energy sector transformation. Energies 2022, 15, 3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorączkowska, J. Enterprise innovation in technology incubators and university business incubators in the context of Polish industry. Oecon. Copernic. 2020, 11, 799–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zinecker, M.; Skalická, M.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B. Business angels in the Czech Republic: Characteristics and a classification with policy implications. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 2021, 16, 273–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zinecker, M.; Skalická, M.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B. Identifying the impact of external environment on business angel activity. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meluzín, T.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Zinecker, M.; Doubravský, K. The impact of rumours related to political and macroeconomic uncertainty on IPO success: Evidence from a qualitative model. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2018, 2017, 148–169. [Google Scholar]
- Meluzín, T.; Zinecker, M.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Doubravský, K.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Dohnal, M. The timing of initial public offerings: Non-numerical model based on qualitative trends. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2018, 19, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meluzín, T.; Zinecker, M.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B. Why do companies stay private? Determinants for IPO candidates to consider in Poland and the Czech Republic. East. Eur. Econ. 2018, 56, 471–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meluzín, T.; Zinecker, M.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Doubravský, K. Institutional Settings and their Impact on the IPO Activity: An Exploratory Study Based on Qualitative Modelling. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2021, 18, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Igliński, B.; Pietrzak, M.B. Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects. Energies 2022, 15, 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134735
Igliński B, Pietrzak MB. Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects. Energies. 2022; 15(13):4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134735
Chicago/Turabian StyleIgliński, Bartłomiej, and Michał Bernard Pietrzak. 2022. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects" Energies 15, no. 13: 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134735
APA StyleIgliński, B., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2022). Renewable and Sustainable Energy: Current State and Prospects. Energies, 15(13), 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134735