1. Introduction
Geological explorations in the 21st century have resulted in the discovery of extensive reserves of shale gas with isotopic reversal [
1,
2,
3]. These expeditions elucidated that shale gas with isotopic reversal developed in areas where the maturity of source rock was much greater than 2.0% R
o [
2,
4].
In recent years, substantial research has been conducted to unravel the mechanism of isotopic rollover and reversal of over-mature natural gas. However, the specific procedures involved in this phenomenon remain to be not understood completely. Over the past two years, a novel approach was proposed which implied that isotopic reversal of over-mature shale gas was related to CH
4 polymerization occurring in the early stage of CH
4 cracking [
5,
6]. Chen, B. et al. [
5] proved that shale gas with carbon isotope reversal could be produced via a CH
4 pyrolysis experiment conducted in a closed gold tube system. Furthermore, Mi, J.K. et al. [
6] also demonstrated that the CH
4 polymerization could form a heavy hydrocarbon gas (C
2~C
5) with depleted δ
13C by continuous heating at 450–800 °C, while performing the CH
4 thermal cracking experiment at a heating rate of 20 °C per hour. They further hypothesized that the combination of methyl formed in the early CH
4 cracking stage (termed CH
4 polymerization) was a crucial factor for isotope reversal in over-mature shale gas and that the magnitude of carbon isotope reversal (δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2) was inversely proportional to the degree of CH
4 cracking. In other words, the δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 would mirror the degree of over-mature natural gas cracking to some extent. Zumberge, J. et al. [
1] found that the high production of shale gas occurs only at low wetness values (<5%), corresponding to isotopic reversal, and that the biggest producers tend to have more negative ethane carbon isotope compositions. If the hypothesis that carbon isotopic reversal of over-mature gas is relative to CH
4 cracking, there should be a genetic relationship between CH
4 cracking and the δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 in over-mature shale gas.
CH
4 is the most stable hydrocarbon component and the chief composition in natural gas [
7]. CH
4 thermal stability or the natural gas geochemistry corresponding to CH
4 substantial cracking in a geological setting is very important to determine the largest depth of natural gas exploration [
8]. The present study investigated the geochemical data of several hundred isotopically “abnormal” shale gas samples. Then, a CH
4 pyrolysis experiment was conducted to investigate the carbon isotope variation of hydrocarbon gas generated in the CH
4 cracking process. The similar variations in δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 of mud gas with increasing depth in three shale gas production wells and in that of gaseous products with increasing experimental temperature in the CH
4 cracking experiment indicate that CH
4 polymerization and CH
4 substantial cracking would happen in a geological setting. Finally, two geochemical indices to indicate CH
4 substantial cracking are proposed according to the experimental results of the CH
4 pyrolysis experiment, δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 variations of mud gas, with increasing depth and the variation of shale gas production as a function of geochemical composition in the Sichuan Basin. The scope of this work is to offer new insights into geochemistry to aid the exploration of over-mature shale gas.
2. Isotope Reversal Range Variation of Over-Mature Natural Gas with the Wetness
Previous exploration has proven that shale gas with isotope reversal possesses very low wetness [
2,
3,
8]. The relationship between wetness and δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 for isotopic reversal natural gas obtained from gas fields in the US and China is shown in
Figure 1. It is evident that δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 variation with decreasing wetness of over-mature shale gas can be represented by a parabolic curve. The wetness of shale gas with isotope reversal is less than 1.8%. The δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 increases initially, with decreasing wetness within a wetness range of 0.9~1.8%, and then decreases at wetness <0.9%.
Several researchers have attempted to unravel the mechanism underlying the isotopic reversal of over-mature natural gas since it was extensively encountered in shale gas. Their interpretations can be classified into four types. (1) The isotopic reversal of shale gas at the over-mature stage is caused by the mixing of primary gas from kerogen cracking and secondary gas from the cracking of remained hydrocarbons [
2,
3,
9]. (2) The redox reactions between water and CH
4 at 250–300 °C generate isotopically light carbon dioxide and hydrogen, which further interact and form isotopically light ethane (C
2H
6) and finally cause the isotopic reversal of the shale gas [
1,
8]. (3) The isotope fractionation mechanism during gas desorption from depressurized late-mature shale leads to isotope reversal in the residual gas produced from shale formation [
4]. (4) CH
4 polymerization prior to its substantial cracking causes the isotopic reversal of over-mature natural gas [
5,
6].
(1) Mixing mechanism: In all mixing models, one end member employed in the mixing process was characterized by high wetness (wetness > 20% generally), while another one was a dry gas (wetness < 5%). For instance, the wetness of the two end members that were selected as primary gas and residual cracking gas by Xia X.Y. et al. [
9] for their mixing model were 2.44% and 63.6%, respectively. The 63.6% wetness of residual cracking gas was so high that it rarely exists naturally in geological settings, especially in a shale system with over maturity. Oil-prone kerogen pyrolysis experiment results under hydrous and anhydrous conditions in a closed system illustrated that mixing between primary and cracking gases would not yield isotopic reversal, only isotopic rollover [
10,
11]. While the wetness of two end members involved in a mixing model is fixed, the geochemistry of gases involved in a mixing process is variable in a geological setting. Thus, the interpretation of isotope reversal of over-mature shale gas by a mixing mechanism does not hold true.
(2) Mechanism of oxidation-reduction reactions between CH4 and H2O: In geological settings, as the geological temperature attains the range at which CH4 can react with water (i.e., 250–300 °C), C2H6 reacts with water prior to CH4 owing to the comparatively lower activation energy. The reaction between C2H6 and water would result in the residual C2H6 possessing a heavier carbon isotope. Thus, the model of carbon isotopic reversal will not occur.
(3) Isotope fractionation mechanism during the uplift and depressurization of shale: The initial gas generated in the shale exhibits a normal isotope trend, with δ
13C
1 < δ
13C
2. After the generation of the new gas essentially ceases at high maturities (VR > 2%) and the uplift as well as depressurization are initiated, methane enriched in
12C desorbs from the source rock more rapidly than CH
4 enriched in
13C. Consequently, the residual CH
4 becomes enriched in
13C more rapidly than the residual C
2H
6, which leads to isotope reversal of the residual gas present in rocks [
4]. Thus, the gas stored in conventional reservoirs should exhibit a normal isotope trend in view of this fractionation mechanism. However, the natural gases with isotopic reversal were found both in the marine conventional gas carbonate reservoir in the Sichuan Basin, China [
12] and in the coal-derived tight reservoirs [
13,
14,
15]. Therefore, the isotope fractionation mechanism of shale gas might just be a speculation and requires more concrete evidence.
(4) CH
4 polymerization mechanism: In theory, the ultimate products of CH
4 thermal cracking are C and H
2. However, CH
4 does not crack into carbon and H
2 directly during the cracking process, but does in the gradual dehydrogenation process [
5,
16,
17]. In the CH
4 cracking process, a methane molecular dehydrogenates and forms a methyl radical (CH
3•) and a hydrogen radical (H•) initially. If two H• combine and form H
2, two CH
3• can also combine to produce C
2H
6. There are two kinds of methane molecules (
12CH
4 and
13CH
4) in natural gas.
12CH
3–H is characterized by preferential bond cleavage, while
13CH
3–H is not. Thus, the preferentially formed CH
3• is depleted in the
13C.
12CH
3• combination, which leads to depletion of
13C in heavy gas, and further causes the carbon isotopic reversal of over-mature gas.
Natural gas with the isotopic reversal feature was originally considered to be of abiogenic origin before shale gas with similar features was identified. The abnormal isotopic feature of abiogenic hydrocarbon gas was thought to be caused by the polymerization of CH
4 formed by Fischer–Tropsch synthesis between H
2 and CO
2 (or CO) as well [
18,
19,
20]. However, the hypothesis that CH
4 polymerization leads to isotope reversal in over-mature gas requires further validation with more experimental data.
3. Carbon Isotopic Variation of Hydrocarbon Gas Products in CH4 Pyrolysis Experiment
The modern petrochemical industry has demonstrated that higher hydrocarbons can be generated via CH
4 polymerization in the presence of bifunctional catalysts [
16,
17]. However, in geological settings with sparse metallic catalysts, whether heavy gases depleted in
13C and generated by CH
4 polymerization can form naturally or not must be experimentally proven. In this study, a CH
4 pyrolysis experiment was conducted without any catalysts in a gold tube system.
To quantify the CH4 content in products at different temperatures, a mixture of N2 and CH4 was used in the CH4 cracking experiment. N2 was selected as the reference gas in this experiment as it is the most stable diatomic molecule with a decomposition temperature greater than 3000 °C, thus ensuring that it could not crack at the highest temperature (800 °C) used in this experiment. The gas mixture was purchased from Zhaoge Gas Company, Beijing, China. The percentages of CH4 and N2 (v/v) in the mixing gas were 89.67% and 10.33%, respectively. No other gaseous component was detected in the mixture via gas chromatography (GC). The carbon isotopic composition of CH4 was -26.07%.
The experiments were conducted in a gold tube system. The experimental system had 20 autoclaves and every one had an independent heating apparatus. The sizes of the tubes used in this experiment were 100 mm in length, 5.5 mm in outer diameter and 0.25 mm in thickness, respectively. One end of the tube had been sealed by argon-arc welding before the gas mixture loading. To load gas mixture into the gold tube, a custom made whifflow was developed, which could connect with a vacuum pump and the open tube mouth. In a typical gas loading procedure, the air in the tube was first removed by the vacuum pump to a pressure less than 1 kPa. Then, the mixing gas was injected into the tube from a gas cylinder from the open mouth of the tube. The pressure of gas injected in the tube was about 4 atm in this experiment, which was controlled via a pressure gauge on the gas cylinder. Finally, the open end of tube was sealed by argon-arc welding while the tube was immersed in ice water. The external fluid pressure of tube was kept a constant value of 50 MPa throughout the experiment. The experimental temperature was programmed as follows: the tube was first heated from 20 °C to 300 °C in 1 h and held for 30 min, then heated at a rate of 20 °C/h till the target temperature was arrived. Subsequently, the autoclave heating was terminated. Finally, the tubes were moved out for the relative analysis as the temperature of autoclave decreased to room temperature.
Two gold tubes were loaded into the autoclave at every temperature experiment in case of tube breakage. Moreover, duplicate tubes were also used as replicates for gas analysis and quantification.
Identification and quantification of individual gas components were carried out using a Wasson-Agilent 7890 GC. The heating program for the GC oven was heating from 20 °C to 68 °C (held isothermal for 7 min), then to 90 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min (held isothermal for 1.5 min), and finally to 175 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min (held isothermal for 1.5 min). An external standard with 12 gas components was used for the chromatographic calibration. Certified gas standards were prepared at a precision of better than ± 0.1 mol% for each component made by Zhaoge Gas Company, Beijing, China.
The stable carbon isotopes of the hydrocarbon gases were measured by using an Isochrom II GC-IRMS. The analysis temperature was programmed as follows: heating started from an initial temperature of 30 °C (isothermal for 3 min), then heating at 15 °C/min to 150 °C, and held isothermal for 8 min. The δ13C measurement for each component was repeated at least twice to ensure the analytical error of each component was less than 0.3‰. The δ13C values of each component presented in this work were the average values of two measurements.
The geochemistry of gaseous products of CH
4 cracking experiments at different temperatures is presented in
Table 1. Besides the original components (CH
4 and N
2), heavy hydrocarbon gases (including alkane and alkene) as well as H
2 were generated during the experiment, at different temperatures. The heavy hydrocarbon gases were formed solely via the CH
4 polymerization, as no heavy hydrocarbon gases were detected in the original mixing gas. Overall, CH
4 concentration decreased with increasing temperature (
Figure 2a). However, a slow decreasing in CH
4 content appeared below 700 °C, and a steep decline in CH
4 percentage occurred above 700 °C. The contents of C
2H
6 and H
2, the highest percentage gases in the newly formed components, were in the same order of magnitude (×10
−1%). The contents of all heavy gases increased initially and then decreased with experimental temperature increasing (
Figure 2b,c). The corresponding temperatures at which the contents of C
2H
6 and rest heavy gases reached their maximum values were 750 °C and 675 °C, respectively. The highest concentration of total heavy gas was 1.05% at 750 °C.
The variation in C
2H
6 content with increasing temperature could be classified under three increasing segments (slow, moderate, and intense) as well as a decreasing segment. The slow increase in C
2H
6 content below 575 °C (
Figure 2b) indicated that CH
4 polymerization was weak. Similarly, the moderate increase in C
2H
6 content within a temperature range of 575 °C to 650 °C suggested that CH
4 polymerization increased, while the intense increase in the C
2H
6 content within a temperature range of 650 °C to 750 °C indicated that CH
4 polymerization increased sharply. The decrease in C
2H
6 content above 750 °C (
Figure 2b) was relative to the cracking of C
2H
6 formed by CH
4 polymerization.
The temperature of 750 °C, at which C
2H
6 content began to decrease, was higher than that of 700 °C, at which CH
4 content began to decrease rapidly. This appeared to conflict with the general knowledge in chemistry that the thermal stability of C
2H
6 is lower than that of CH
4. Shuai et al. (2006) observed via a coal pyrolysis experiment in a confined system that the generation and cracking of C
2H
6 could co-exist at high temperatures [
21]. Their experiment results indicated that C
2H
6 cracking began at 500 °C in a coal pyrolysis experiment with the same heating rate of 20 °C/h as that in our experiment. In theory, the ultimate products of CH
4 cracking are C and H
2. However, CH
4 does not produce C and H
2 directly in the cracking process, but rather in the gradual dehydrogenation process. The reactions involved in the process include CH
4 polymerization to form heavy hydrocarbon gas, dehydrogenation of the heavy hydrocarbon gas to produce unsaturated heavy gas and the further dehydrogenation of the unsaturated heavy hydrocarbon gas to generate C and H
2 [
5,
16,
17]. Therefore, all the aforementioned reactions (including CH
4 polymerization and heavy gas further dehydrogenation or cracking) could not stop as CH
4 does not convert into C and H
2 completely. Although the content of CH
4 decreases obviously at the highest experimental temperature of 800 °C, C
2H
6 does not disappear in experimental products. In other words, C
2H
6 cracking and C
2H
6 formation vs. CH
4 polymerization could co-exist at the high temperatures of our experiment. In the temperature range of 700–750 °C, the ratio of C
2H
6 formation vs. CH
4 polymerization was greater than that of C
2H
6 cracking, which was attributed to the increase of C
2H
6 content in this temperature range. Correspondingly, the higher ratio of C
2H
6 cracking vs. that of C
2H
6 formation via CH
4 polymerization caused the decrease in the content above 750 °C. In this study, the whole process of CH
4 cracking is divided into two stages: the early cracking stage and the substantial cracking stage. The early CH
4 cracking stage includes all the reactions prior to solid C formation. Whereas the substantial CH
4 cracking stage refers to the change from solid C appearance to CH
4 complete conversion into solid C.
The decrease in content of other heavy gases above 675 °C (
Figure 2c) was also caused by their cracking. The same cracking temperature of 675 °C for C
3H
8 and C
4H
10 did not mean that they shared the same thermal stability as well. Instead, the temperature interval of 650–675 °C used in this experiment might cover the temperature point at which C
4H
10 contents began to decrease.
The inner wall of the tubes heated to different temperatures has been depicted in
Figure 3. The color of the inner wall of the tube was brown at 725 °C, and became black with increasing temperature. The brown and black solids deposited on the inner walls above 725 °C were identified as carbon via energy spectrum analysis. The temperature at which the solid C formed was consistent with that at which CH
4 began to decrease sharply. Consequently, the appearance of solid carbon on the tube inner wall at 725 °C indicated that the substantial cracking of CH
4 began in the temperature range of 700–725 °C.
Zhang et al. (2013) reported that the lowest temperature of solid C generated by CH
4 cracking is 400 °C in an isothermal Fischer–Tropsch experiment [
22]. The lowest temperature (725 °C) of solid C generated in our non-isothermal CH
4 cracking experiment is higher than that of solid C generated in the Zhang et al. (2013) isothermal Fischer–Tropsch experiment. This difference in temperature corresponding to solid C appearance is attributed to the compensation between temperature and isothermal duration as well as the catalyst effect in the Zhang et al. (2013) isothermal experiment. Nevertheless, the hydrocarbon gas shares a feature of carbon isotopic reversal before solid C appearance in the two experiments. This also indicates the CH
4 polymerization happens before CH
4 substantial cracking.
As presented in
Table 1 and
Figure 4, δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 generally increased with increasing temperature (
Figure 3). The variation in δ
13C
2 with increasing temperature could be divided into three segments: gradual increase in δ
13C
2 below 625 °C; rapid increase from 625 to 725 °C; and slow increase above 725 °C. The variation of δ
13C
1 was not observable within the analytic error (±0.5‰) below 725 °C. This is consistent with the slight decrease in CH
4 content (1.26%) below 725 °C. The distribution between δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 showed a distinct reversal trend for (δ
13C
1 > δ
13C
2) below 725 °C, while it was normal (δ
13C
1 < δ
13C
2) above 725 °C.
The experimental CH
4 cracking results indicated that CH
4 polymerization leading to heavy gas formation had occurred at 450 °C. However, the CH
4 polymerization was so weak that no obvious decrease in CH
4 content was observed—and consequently, a trace heavy gas was observed below 600 °C. CH
4 polymerization increased noticeably within the temperature range of 600–750 °C, resulting in increased heavy gas content. The generation of non-saturated heavy gas above 600 °C indicated that saturated heavy gas had begun to undergo cracking and further caused the rapid isotopic reversal of δ
13C
2. Nevertheless, C
2H
6 content continued to increase, and the carbon isotopic distribution exhibited a reversal below 725 °C (
Figure 4). This was attributed to the relatively higher ratio of the CH
4 polymerization to form heavy gas than that of heavy gas cracking, i.e., a high ratio of C
2H
6 cracking compared to C
2H
6 formation, caused by the decrease in C
2H
6 content above 725 °C. The values of δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 tended toward becoming equal as CH
4 began to substantial crack at 700–725 °C.
The CH4 cracking experiment elucidated that methane cracking could be divided into two stages, early cracking and substantial cracking. The combination of methyl depleted in δ13C, which formed in the early CH4 cracking stage, and produced heavy hydrocarbon gas with a light isotopic composition. The methyl combination could be looked at as CH4 polymerization. CH4 polymerization is an important underlying factor for isotope reversal in over-mature gas. Moreover, δ13C1–δ13C2 decreased with an increase in experimental temperature prior to CH4 substantial cracking. The values of δ13C1–δ13C2 tended to become zero during the process of CH4 substantial cracking. Thus, δ13C1–δ13C2 could potentially be interpreted as a factor to predict the degree of CH4 cracking.
4. Carbon Isotope Variation of Mud Gas vs. the Depth during Shale Gas Drilling
As mentioned above, the CH4 cracking experiment proved that δ13C1–δ13C2 in over-mature shale gas could be used as an index to extrapolate the degree of CH4 cracking. Nevertheless, the experimental conclusion requires further validation of the practical data obtained from shale gas exploration. Generally, shale gas collected from a gas field is often a mixture of the gases obtained at different depths from the entire reservoir. The carbon isotopic composition of shale gas does not display any variations in δ13C1 and δ13C2 with increasing depth. In reality, the mud gas from varying depths during shale drilling is the original shale gas stored in shale. Thus, the carbon composition of mud gas from different depths could reveal whether the trend of δ13C1 and δ13C2 variation with increasing depth—similar to that observed during the CH4 cracking experiment with increasing temperature—exists in geological settings.
The Sichuan Basin is a petroliferous gas basin located in the southwest of China. A large amount of shale gas has been produced in both the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation and the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the basin. Both these clusters of shale gas attain over maturity [
23,
24]. Moreover, a majority of the shale gas extracted from these formations bears a feature of isotope reversal [
25].
Niu et al. have presented the carbon isotope composition variation with depth of mud gases obtained from the three shale gas wells (DY5, JY10-10, SY3,
Figure 5) [
26]. In the three wells, the δ
13C
1 of mud gas increased with increasing depth. Contrastingly, the δ
13C
2 of mud gas initially decreased with increasing depth, followed by a sharp increase. All the mud gas observed in the interval segment exhibited isotope reversal. With increasing depth, δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 of mud gas increases initially, then decreases and ultimately reaches zero. The vertical variation in δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 for mud gas was fairly consistent with the conclusion derived from the CH
4 cracking experiment that δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 decreased with increasing CH
4 cracking degree.
The CH
4 cracking experiment results indicated that CH
4 polymerization had occurred at 450 °C (Easy R
o = 1.49%). At this maturity level, the C
2H
6, which existed originally in over-mature shale gas, could not undergo substantial cracking in geological settings. With a rise in geological temperature or maturity level, CH
4 polymerization also increases, and more C
2H
6 depleted in δ
13C is formed. The latter cause depletion of δ
13C in the original C
2H
6, further resulting in isotope reversal in natural gas. With the increase in C
2H
6 formation via polymerization, the δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 in natural gas escalates as well. The cracking of C
2H
6 formed via CH
4 polymerization occurs at a greater depth or higher temperature and causes a rapid increase in δ
13C
2. At this stage, CH
4 cracking and polymerization attain a dynamic equilibrium, while the δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 tend to become equal. Thus, the vertical variation in δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 in mud gases with increasing depth is in concurrence with the conclusions derived from the CH
4 cracking experiment. Moreover, the vertical variations of δ
13C
1 and δ
13C
2 with increasing depth is consistent with the results presented in
Figure 1, which reflects the relationship between δ
13C
1–δ
13C
2 and the wetness of over-mature shale gas.
The quantity of mud gas is very low in the segment of the three wells, where δ13C1 nearly equals δ13C2. In addition, hardly any hydrocarbon gas was detected in the deeper segment below the layer where δ13C1 nearly equals δ13C2. Thus, it is evident that the phenomenon of very low gas content and approximately equivalent δ13C1 and δ13C2 should be caused by CH4 substantial cracking.