Energy Efficiency of Transport Tasks Performed by the Air SAR System in the Baltic Sea: Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Section 1: a literature review.
- Section 2: a presentation of our own model for the selection of the base and transport vehicles, for the transport task carried out by the air SAR system in the Polish zone of responsibility in the Baltic Sea, based on energy efficiency criteria.
- Section 3: validation of the model,
- Section 4: a simulation study of the expansion of the air SAR system, with a new base or the purchase of new means of transport in which the developed model will be used.
2. Literature Analysis
- Scope 1: the issue of energy efficiency in rail transport;
- Scope 2: the issue of energy efficiency in car transport;
- Scope 3: the issue of energy efficiency in water transport;
- Scope 4: the issue of energy efficiency in urban transport;
- Scope 5: energy efficiency issues in air transport.
3. Methodology
3.1. Mathematical Model of the Problem
- The transport task is part of the rescue operation carried out by the air SAR system.
- The implementation of the transport task takes place within the adopted SAR responsibility zone (e.g., the Polish SAR responsibility zone in the Baltic Sea).
- The implementation of a given transport task complies with the applicable procedures for conducting rescue operations by the SAR system.
- The transport task is performed by the aircraft of the SAR system.
- Transport tasks begin and end at the bases of the air SAR system.
- Helicopter take-off from the air base of the SAR system.
- Flight to the search site.
- Searching for and picking up the survivors.
- Flight to a location where the survivors are provided further aid (e.g., medical points).
- Return flight to the base.
- Landing at the base of the SAR system.
3.2. Model Parameters
- sb(lb,tz)—a binary variable with the interpretation of the start from a given base for the implementation of the transport task, stored in the matrix A1(tz).
- cr(lc,tz)—binary variable about rescue flight target assignment interpretation, stored in the matrix A2(tz).
- mp(lm,tz)—binary variable about the interpretation of the assignment of the handover place of the injured person (s), recorded in the matrix A3(tz).
- sp(he,tz)—binary variable about the interpretation of the assignment of the aircraft to the transport task, stored in the matrix A4(tz).
- ou(tz,pe)—the transported elements are the people saved, taken from the set PE.
- bt(tz,bs)—the transport task with the tz number starts in the base with the bs number of the air SAR system.
- pt(tz,ct)—the purpose of the transport task with the number tz is the search point (target of the rescue flight) with the number ct.
- mt(tz,mmt)—the transport task with the number tz has a point with the number mmt, i.e., the place of handing over the injured.
- et(tz,bs)—the transport task with the tz number ends in the base with the bs number of the aviation SAR system.
- vpo(he,tz)—search speed carried out by the he helicopter as part of the transport task with the number tz.
- vp(he,tz)—flight speed of the helicopter he as part of the transport task with the number tz.
- rp(he,tz)—search radius by the helicopter he as part of the transport task with the number tz.
- tt(tz)—duration of the transport task with the number tz.
- tlo(tz,tt)—flight time to the search (activity) area; the flight is carried out as part of the transport task tz.
- tpr(tz,tt)—working time in the search area; the work is carried out as part of the transport task tz.
- tld(tz,tt)—flight time to the place of casualty transfer; the flight is carried out as part of the transport task tz.
- tpb(tz,tt)—time of return to base; the flight is carried out as part of the transport task tz.
- ty(he)—helicopter type, vm(he)—the maximum speed of the helicopter; vp(he)—the cruising speed of the helicopter; ve(he)—economic speed of the helicopter; vn(he)—the minimum speed of the helicopter; dl(he)—helicopter flight length with basic fuel supply; lsn(he)—number of engines; jzp(he)—specific fuel consumption.
- dw(tz)—wind direction during the implementation of the transport task; sw(tz)—wind force during the implementation of the transport task; we(tz)—the type of weather during the implementation of the transport task; vis(tz)—visibility during the implementation of the transport task; ss(tz)—the state of the sea during the implementation of the transport task.
3.3. Assessment Indicators for the Selection of the Base and Means of Transport
- minimizing the costs of implementing the transport task:
- minimizing energy consumption for the implementation of the transport task (determining the effectiveness of a given transport task):
- minimizing the time:
3.4. Limitations in the Problem of Choosing the Base and Means of Transport
4. Case Study
4.1. Characteristics of the Aviation SAR System
- Actions performed by rescuers lifting the rescued persons onto the helicopter deck may be hampered by the noise of the rotors and air turbulence at the scene of the operation, caused by helicopters. To facilitate coordination between helicopters and lifesaving equipment, and to minimize the risk of collision associated with helicopters operating in confined spaces, operations should be coordinated by an agency communicating with them, preferably by an OSC.
- The number of survivors that the helicopter can take on board for a given transport task is limited. Therefore, it may be necessary to reduce its weight by removing irrelevant equipment or fuel. The amount of fuel at the scene of the incident can be reduced by using advanced bases with refueling capabilities.
- The helicopter route and the place where survivors are to disembark should be known to the SMC.
- Due to limited fuel reserves for helicopters and their susceptibility to icing in some locations, it may be advantageous to send the aircraft in advance to confirm the weather condition en-route and to ensure that the unit requiring assistance is adequately informed in advance of the procedures for lifting the rescued persons by helicopter.
- Conducting a rescue operation by landing a helicopter on board a ship or another facility creates additional concerns. Factors, such as turbulence, ground level, loose objects, altitude, landing, and take-off paths, must be taken into account when selecting a landing site. High altitude operations reduce the performance of the helicopter and seriously affect the hovering ability.
- A typical successful rescue operation is carried out by locating the survivors and taking them to the helicopter deck using a winch, rescue basket, rescue net, emergency chair, or emergency stretcher.
4.2. Analysis of Rescue Operations Carried out by the Air SAR System
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cieśla, M.; Sobota, A.; Jacyna, M. Multi-Criteria decision making process in metropolitan transport means selection based on the sharing mobility idea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacyna, M.; Semenov, I. Models of vehicle service system supply under information uncertainty. Eksploat. I Niezawodn. 2020, 22, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Martinis, V.; Corman, F. Data-driven perspectives for energy efficient operations in railway systems: Current practices and future opportunities. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 95, 679–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacyna, M.; Szczepański, E.; Izdebski, M.; Jasiński, S.; Maciejewski, M. Characteristics of event recorders in Automatic train control systems. Arch. Transp. 2018, 46, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacyna, M.; Gołębiowski, P.; Urbaniak, M. Multi-option Model of Railway Traffic Organization Including the Energy Recuperation. In Programmieren für Ingenieure und Naturwissenschaftler; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 199–210. [Google Scholar]
- Urbaniak, M.; Kardas-Cinal, E.; Jacyna, M. Optimization of Energetic Train Cooperation. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ciccarelli, F.; DEL Pizzo, A.; Iannuzzi, D. Improvement of Energy Efficiency in Light Railway Vehicles Based on Power Management Control ofWayside Lithium-Ion Capacitor Storage. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szkoda, M.; Satora, M.; Konieczek, Z. Effectiveness assessment of diesel locomotives operation with the use of mobile maintenance points. Arch. Transp. 2020, 54, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, M.; Bitoleanu, A. A Review of the Energy Efficiency Improvement in DC Railway Systems. Energies 2019, 12, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gunselmann, W. Technologies for increased energy efficiency in railway systems. In Proceedings of the 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Dresden, Germany, 11–14 September 2005; p. 10. [Google Scholar]
- Gołębiowki, P.; Jacyna, M.; Stańczak, A. The Assessment of Energy Efficiency versus Planning of Rail Freight Traffic: A Case Study on the Example of Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ćwil, M.; Barnik, W.; Jastrzębowski, S. Railway vehicle energy efficiency as a key factor in creating sustainable transportation systems. Energies 2021, 14, 5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brenna, M.; Bucci, V.; Falvo, M.C.; Foiadelli, F.; Ruvio, A.; Sulligoi, G.; Vicenzutti, A. A review on energy efficiency in three transportation secotrs: Railways, electrical vehicles and marine. Energies 2020, 13, 2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandoval-Garcia, E.; Matsumoto, Y.; Sanchez-Partida, D. Data and energy efficiency indicators of freight transport sector in Mexico. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filin, S.; Filina-Dawidowicz, L. Improvement of Criteria for Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Thermoelectric Refrigerators Used in Supply Chains. Energies 2021, 14, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zajac, P.; Rozic, T. Energy consumption of forklift versus standards, effects of their use and expectations. Energy 2022, 239, D122187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zajac, P. Indicators and Measures of Energy Efficiency the Warehouse. Energy Comsumption Refrig. Wareh. 2016, 11, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrzycki, A.; Filipiak, M.; Jajczyk, J. Changes in the range of electric vehicles during operation. Comput. Appl. Electr. Eng. 2019, 28, 01009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rehmatulla, N.; Smith, T. The impact of split incentives on energy efficiency technology investments in maritime transport. Energy Policy 2020, 147, 111721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayasinghe, S.; Lokuketagoda, G.; Enshaei, H.; Shagar, V.; Ranmuthugala, D. Electro-technologies for energy efficiency improvement and low carbon emission in martitime transport. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual General Assembly and Conference of the International Association of Maritime Universities, Rijeka, Croatia, 7–10 October 2015; pp. 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- Bazaluk, O.; Havrysh, V.; Nitsenko, V. Energy Efficiency of Inland Waterways Transport for Agriculture: The Ukraine Case Study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filina-Dawidowicz, L.; Filin, S. Innovative energy-saving technology in refrigerated containers transportation. Energy Effic. 2019, 12, 1151–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vajihi, M.; Ricci, S. Energy Efficiency Assessment of Rail Freight Transport: Freight Tram in Berlin. Energies 2021, 14, 3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejdys, S. Model of a Sustainable Transport System on the Example of Olsztyn. Rocz. Ochr. Srodowiska 2021, 23, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlov, G.; Sekulov, L. Study and Analysis of Efficiency of Recuperative Energy Utilization in Ground Urban Electric Transport. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems (ELMA), Sofia, Bulgaria, 1–4 July 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izdebski, M.; Jacyna, M. An Efficient Hybrid Algorithm for Energy Expenditure Estimation for Electric Vehicles in Urban Service Enterprises. Energies 2021, 14, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosai, S.; Yuasa, M.; Yamasue, E. Chronological transition of relationship between intracity lifecycle transport energy efficiency and population density. Energies 2020, 13, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, G.; Wojciechowski, J. Improving chosen elements of energy efficiency in public transport through the use of supercapacitors. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 1083, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misanovic, S.M.; Zivanovic, Z.M.; Tica, S.M. Energy efficiency of different bus subsystems in Belgrade public transport. Therm. Sci. 2015, 19, 2233–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filipiak, M.; Jajczyk, J. The economics of use wireless power supply in electric buses. Comput. Appl. Electr. Eng. 2018, 19, 01034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cansino, J.M.; Roman, R. Energy efficiency improvements in air traffic: The case of Airbus A320 in Spain. Energy Policy 2017, 101, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verstraete, D. On the energy efficiency of hydrogen-fuelled transport aircraft. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 7388–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donateo, T.; Ficarella, A.; Spedicato, L. Applyng dynamic programming algorithms to the energy management of hybrid electric aircraft. In Proceedings of the Asme Turbo EXPO: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Lillestrom (Oslo), Norway, 11–15 June 2018; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Bolvashenkov, I.; Kammermann, J.; Herzog, H.G. Eliability assessment of a fault tolerant propulsion system for an electrical helicopter. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER 2017), Monte-Carlo, Monaco, 11–13 April 2017; p. 7935864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolvashenkov, I.; Kammermann, J.; Rubinraut, A.; Herzog, H.; Frenkel, I. Design and Feasibility of Electrical Version of Search-and-Rescure Helicopter Based on Eurocopter. SpringerBriefs Appl. Sci. Technol. 2022, 14, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Niu, Y.J.; Fang, W.g.; Zhang, T.t. Research on the Efficiency and Application of Ship-Helicopter Cooperative Search. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2019, 11632, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Q.; Xu, C.; Zhu, Y. Multi-Helicopter Search and Rescue Route Planning Based on Strategy Optimization Algorithm. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 2019, 33, 1950002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schemke, S.; Schwalbe, H.; Grunewald, L.; Maurer, H. Emergency medicine in the German Maritime Search and Rescue Service-Evaluation of medical emergencies in the North Sea and Baltic Sea over 2 years. Anaesthesist 2021, 70, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, P.; Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, B.; Yang, H. Helicopter maritime search area planning based on a minimum bounding rectangle and K-means clustering. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2021, 34, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz-Carretero, J.; Pardo, A.C.; Goulos, I.; Pachidis, V. Impact of adverse environmental conditions on rotorcraft operational performance and pollutant emissions. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2018, 140, 021201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, Y. Discrete mission planning algorithm for air-sea integrated search model. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kratzke, T.M.; Stone, L.D.; Frost, J.R. Search and Rescue Optimal Planning Sytem. IEEE Xplore 2011, 10, 11823426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Wang, R.; Xiong, P.; Wu, G. A Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Time-Space Weight for Helicopter Maritime Search and Rescue Decision-Making. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 81526–81541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otote, D.A.; Li, B.; Ai, B.; Gao, S.; Xu, J.; Chen, X.; Lv, G. A Decision-Making Algoritm for Maritime Search and Rescue Plan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudyk, T.; Szczepański, E.; Jacyna, M. Safety factor in the sustainable fleet management model. Arch. Transp. 2019, 49, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gołda, P.; Zawisza, T.; Izdebski, M. Evaluation of efficiency and reliability of airport processes using simulation tools. Eksploat. Niezawodn. 2021, 23, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chistensen, R.E.; Ottosen, C.I.; Sonne, A.; Novernberg, B.; Juul, A.H.; Steinmetz, J.; Rasmussen, L.S. Search and rescue helicopters for emergency medical service assistance: A retrospective Study. Air Med. J. 2021, 40, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Research Area | Year of Publication | Source |
---|---|---|
Scope 1: rail transport | ||
Railway traffic energy efficiency | 2018, 2018 | [3,4] |
Optimization of passenger train timetables with similar traction characteristics, energy recovery criterion at the stage of starting and braking | 2016, 2019 | [5,6] |
Energy efficiency of rail transport, including rail means of transport | 2014, 2020 | [7,8] |
Modernization of the railway transport system in terms of energy efficiency | 2019, 2005 | [9,10] |
The problem of the selection of rolling stock (wagons, locomotives) for transport, in terms of energy efficiency assessment | 2021 | [11] |
Energy consumption for the three types of railway vehicles | 2021 | [12] |
The issue of energy efficiency in rail transport | 2020 | [13] |
Scope 2: car transport | ||
Indicative assessment of the energy efficiency of road transport | 2021 | [14] |
Developing criteria for assessing the energy efficiency of refrigerators used in supply chains | 2021 | [15] |
Shaping the calculation method to determine energy consumption by forklifts in logistic centers | 2022 | [16] |
Indicative evaluation of the energy efficiency of the warehouse in the transport chain | 2016 | [17] |
Shaping the range of electric vehicles | 2019 | [18] |
Scope 3: water transport | ||
Assessment of the impact of measures and incentives aimed at energy efficiency in maritime transport | 2020 | [19] |
Improving fuel efficiency and the energy efficiency of the watercraft | 2020 | [20] |
Assessment of energy efficiency in relation to the theoretical and actual energy consumption of inland navigation | 2021 | [21] |
Shaping energy-saving technology in application to refrigerated containers in port terminals and on ships | 2019 | [22] |
Scope 4: urban transport | ||
Assessment of energy efficiency on the example of a freight tram | 2021 | [23,24] |
Energy recovery and energy efficiency of urban electric transport | 2021 | [25,26] |
Life cycle of urban transport and energy efficiency | 2020 | [27] |
Energy storage and the energy efficiency of urban transport | 2020 | [28] |
Assessment of energy efficiency of various bus transport subsystems in public transport | 2015 | [29] |
Economical evaluation of power supply in electric buses | 2018 | [30] |
Scope 5: air transport | ||
Improving energy efficiency in air traffic | 2017 | [31] |
Assessment of energy efficiency of hydrogen-powered transport aircraft | 2015 | [32] |
Energy management in hybrid electric planes | 2018 | [33] |
Assessment of the reliability of the drive system used in an electric helicopter | 2017 | [34] |
Research Area | Year of Publication | Source |
---|---|---|
Testing the drive system of an electric helicopter for rescue operations | 2022 | [35] |
Testing the effectiveness of operating helicopters | 2019 | [36] |
Study of an efficient route planning algorithm during the implementation of a rescue operation | 2019 | [37] |
Analysis of medical rescue services in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea | 2021 | [38] |
Planning of the search area, based on K-means clustering | 2021 | [39] |
Development of a methodology to quantify the impact of helicopter operating conditions on the environment during the implementation of actions under the SAR system | 2018 | [40] |
Development of an optimization model with the criteria of minimizing the time of rescue operations by helicopters in the MSAR system | 2021 | [41] |
Analysis of the Search and Rescue Optimal Planning System (SAROPS) | 2011 | [42] |
Development of an algorithm to optimize activities in the MSAR system | 2020 | [43] |
Analysis of the decision-making algorithm in sea rescue | 2019 | [44] |
Name | Notation |
---|---|
Location of the SAR system air bases | LB |
Rescue flight target location | LC |
Location of intermediate points | LM |
Parameters of the transport task | TZ |
Aircraft parameters | PS |
Costs of the transport task | KT |
Energy efficiency of the transport task | ET |
Tactical and Technical Data | |
---|---|
Maximum cargo mass inside the helicopter | 2100 kg |
Maximum flight speed | 260 km/h |
Maximum cruising speed | 235 km/h |
Maximum recommended cruising speed | 222 km/h |
Maximum range without additional fuel tanks at 222 km/h | 734 km |
Maximum flight endurance at 125 km/h | 4.2 h |
Radius rp (km) | Cruising Speed | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vp = 220 km/h | vp = 200 km/h | vp = 180 km/h | vp = 130 km/h | |||||
Time tlo (min) | Time tpr (min) | Time tlo (min) | Time tpr (min) | Time tlo (min) | Time tpr (min) | Time tlo (min) | Time tpr (min) | |
100 | 27 | 100 | 30 | 108 | 33 | 115 | 46 | 123 |
150 | 41 | 72 | 45 | 77 | 50 | 82 | 69 | 88 |
200 | 55 | 45 | 60 | 47 | 67 | 50 | 92 | 55 |
250 | 68 | 18 | 75 | 20 | 83 | 21 | 115 | 23 |
Radius rp (km) | 250 | 200 | 150 | 100 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed vpo (km/h) | 220 | 180 | 130 | 110 | 220 | 180 | 130 | 110 | 220 | 180 | 130 | 110 | 220 | 180 | 130 | 110 |
Time tpr (min) | 18.5 | 21 | 22.5 | 22 | 45.5 | 52.5 | 56 | 55 | 73 | 84 | 89.5 | 88.5 | 100 | 115 | 123 | 121 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fiuk, J.; Chamier-Gliszczynski, N.; Jacyna, M.; Izdebski, M. Energy Efficiency of Transport Tasks Performed by the Air SAR System in the Baltic Sea: Case Study. Energies 2022, 15, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020643
Fiuk J, Chamier-Gliszczynski N, Jacyna M, Izdebski M. Energy Efficiency of Transport Tasks Performed by the Air SAR System in the Baltic Sea: Case Study. Energies. 2022; 15(2):643. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020643
Chicago/Turabian StyleFiuk, Jerzy, Norbert Chamier-Gliszczynski, Marianna Jacyna, and Mariusz Izdebski. 2022. "Energy Efficiency of Transport Tasks Performed by the Air SAR System in the Baltic Sea: Case Study" Energies 15, no. 2: 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020643
APA StyleFiuk, J., Chamier-Gliszczynski, N., Jacyna, M., & Izdebski, M. (2022). Energy Efficiency of Transport Tasks Performed by the Air SAR System in the Baltic Sea: Case Study. Energies, 15(2), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020643