Management Accounting System in the Management of an Intelligent Energy Sector Enterprise
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What managerial accounting tools are used in the implementation of enterprise management functions: planning, organizing, leading, controlling?
- What managerial accounting tools do managers use in strategic decision making?
- What managerial accounting tools do managers use in operational decision making?
- What impact do the managerial accounting tools used have on energy industry entity management?
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
- owner/manager;
- senior/executive manager (strategic level);
- mid-level manager;
- operational-level manager.
4. Results
5. Discussion
- Intelligent suite;
- Digital platform;
- Intelligent technology.
- internal processes digitalization, and automation of implemented tasks treated as natural communication;
- systematic analysis of weaknesses and deviations in the achievement of the goals intended;
- conduction/support of research and development activities;
- introduction of new technologies;
- introduction of network organizational structure and delegation of responsibility to lower levels of management;
- exploitation of the full employee potential;
- knowledge management.
6. Conclusions
- Repetitive process automation (RPA)—answering queries using AI chatbots, transaction classification, fixed and current asset management, process control, online communication, problem solving at various organizational levels, and savings, enriching the use thereof with a finance module that allows, at this stage, financial forecasting, financial control, simple budgets, and KPIs (key performance indicators) tailored to the specifics and information needs of the energy industry entity.
- Real-time decision making—the amount of the data provided is increasing, and the algorithms based on BI or ML technologies enable data visualization and allow managers to predict business decisions.
- Creation of business value—by processing large amounts of data through defined algorithms, reducing the time of analysis performance via real-time decision making.
- wider use of the tools of the management accounting system in the performance of the management function in an energy company;
- use of management accounting tools tailored to the needs of the energy entity;
- application of modern technologies supporting the functioning of the management accounting system, providing managers with access to information in real time.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Polskie Towarzystwo Przesyłu i Rozdziału Energii Elektrycznej (PTPiREE). Energetyka, Dystrybucja, Przemysł; Raport branżowy 2022; PTPiREE: Poznań, Poland, 2022; pp. 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- Little, A.D. Report: Disruption is Now, How Decarbonization, Decentralization, and Digitalization Transform the Energy and Resources Sector. ADL. May 2022, pp. 4–7. Available online: https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/report/disruption-now (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- Wójcik, G.P. Wpływ systemu zarządzania na efektywność przedsiębiorstwa energetycznego. Res. Pap. Wrocław Univ. Econ. 2012, 265, 390–403. [Google Scholar]
- Borowski, P.F. Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants. Energies 2022, 15, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, A.D. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, K.R. The Concept of Corporate Strategy; R. D. Irwin: Homewood, IL, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Helmold, M. Lean Management and Kaizen; Fundamentals from Cases and Examples in Operations and Supply Chain Management; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, K. A review on implementation of 5s for workplace management. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng. 2022, 9, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Golrizgashti, S.; Sarkis, J. Product deletion and supply chain repercussions: Risk management using FMEA. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021, 28, 409–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rankovic, N.; Rankovic, D.; Ivanovic, M.; Lazic, L. Improved Effort and Cost Estimation Model Using Artificial Neural Networks and Taguchi Method with Different Activation Functions. Entropy 2021, 23, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiaofeng, C. Is JIT just in time or on time production? Enterp. Manag. 2021, 5, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, R.; Madachy, R.; Ingold, D.; Lane, J.A. Modeling kanban processes in systems engineering. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP), Zurich, Switzerland, 2–3 June 2012; pp. 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, A.; Scuotto, V. The Business Model Canvas. Symphonya. Emerg. Issues Manag. 2015, 3, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haiyun, C.; Zhixiong, H.; Yüksel, S.; Dinçer, H. Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabriel, C.A.; Kirkwood, J. Business models for model businesses: Lessons from renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries. Energy Policy 2016, 95, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelken, M.; Römer, B.; Drescher, M.; Welpe, I.M.; Picot, A. Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuo, Y.; Endo, S.; Nagatomi, Y.; Shibata, Y.; Komiyama, R.; & Fujii, Y. Investigating the economics of the power sector under high penetration of variable renewable energies. Appl. Energy 2020, 267, 113956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bromwich, M. The case for strategic management accounting: The role of accounting information for strategy in competitive markets. Account. Organ. Soc. 1990, 15, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlsson-Wall, M.; Kraus, K.; Lind, J. Strategic management accounting in close inter-organisational relationships. Account. Bus. Res. 2015, 45, 27–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, C.; Costantini, A.; Grassetti, L. Strategic choices and strategic management accounting in large manufacturing firms. J. Manag. Gov. 2019, 23, 605–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaeddin, O.; Shawtari, F.A.; Salem, M.A.; Altounjy, R. The effect of management accounting systems in influenc in environmental uncertainty, energy efficiency and environmental performance. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2019, 9, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbejule, A. The relationship between management accounting systems and perceived environmental uncertainty on managerial performance: A research note. Account. Bus. Res. 2012, 35, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A.A. Association between strategic management accounting facets and organizational performance. Balt. J. Manag. 2018, 14, 212–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadid, W.; Al-Sayed, M. Management accountants and strategic management accounting: The role of organizational culture and information systems. Manag. Account. Res. 2021, 50, 100725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gongjun, L. Innovative application of strategic management accounting in private enterprises. Commer. Account. 2019, 5, 58–66. [Google Scholar]
- Burritt, R.L.; Schaltegger, S.; Zvezdov, D. Carbon Management Accounting: Explaining Practice in Leading German Companies. Aust. Account. Rev. 2011, 21, 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haseeb, M.; Hussain, H.I.; Ślusarczyk, B.; Jermsittiparsert, K. Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kowalewski, M. Umiejscowienie controllingu oraz zasady wyodrębniania ośrodków odpowiedzialności za koszty w Miejskim Przedsiębiorstwie Energetyki Cieplnej. Finans. Rynk. Finans. Ubezpieczenia 2017, 88, 457–468. [Google Scholar]
- Zahid, N.; Vagif, L. The Role of Management Accounting in the Organization. Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci. 2020, 9, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar]
- Rybicka, K. New Technologies—the Impact on Contemporary Management Accounting. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu 2018, 515, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nielsen, S. Reflections on the applicability of business analytics for management accounting—and future perspectives for the accountant. J. Account. Organ. Change 2018, 14, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varzaru, A.A.; Bocean, C.G.; Mangra, M.G.; Mangra, G.I. Assessing the Effects of Innovative Management Accounting Tools on Performance and Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilensky, H. Organizational Intelligence: Knowledge and Policy in Government and Industry; Quid Pro Books: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2015; pp. 2–3. [Google Scholar]
- March, J.G. The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence; Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Liebowitz, J.; Ditsch, R. WBuilding Organizational Intelligence: A Knowledge Management Primer; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Leksykon Zarządzania; Difin: Warszawa, Poland, 2004; p. 171.
- Łobejko, S. Trendy Rozwojowe Inteligentnych Organizacji w Globalnej Gospodarce. Ekspertyza Współfinansowana Przez Unię Europejską w Ramach Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego, Warszawa. 2009; p. 11. Available online: https://www.parp.gov.pl/storage/publications/pdf/2009_trendy_rozwojowe_lobejko.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2022).
- Thannhuber, M.J. The Inteligent Enterprise: Theoretical Concepts and Practical Implications; Physica Verlag, A Springer Company: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 71. [Google Scholar]
- Choo, C.W. Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: The Art of Scanning the Environment; Information Today/Learned Information: Medford, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Bylok, F.; Jelonek, D.; Tomski, P.; Wysłocka, E. Role of Social Capital in Creating Innovative Climate in Enterprises: The Case of Poland. In Proceedings of the ICICKM 2019 16th International Conference on Intellectual Capital Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning, Sydney, Australia, 5–6 December 2019; pp. 5–6. [Google Scholar]
- Borowski, P.F. Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelonek, D. Systemy Informacyjne Zarządzania Przedsiębiorstwem, Perspektywy Strategii i Tworzenia Wartości; PWE S.A.: Warszawa, Poland, 2018; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Williams, A. Intelligent Accounting System Structure and Intelligent Accounting Algorithm Based on Computer Vision. In Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics; Xu, Z., Alrabaee, S., Loyola-González, O., Zhang, X., Cahyani, N.D.W., Ab Rahman, N.H., Eds.; CSIA 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 125, pp. 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gotthardt, M.; Dan, K.; Paksoy, O.; Saramo, C.; Lehner, O. Current state and challenges in the implementation of smart robotic process automation in accounting and auditing. ACRN J. Financ. Risk Perspect. 2020, 9, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowak, S. Metodologia Badań Społecznych; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2011; pp. 22–23. [Google Scholar]
- Trzaskalik, T. Wybrane Zagadnienia Zarządzania Projektami. In Informatyka w Badaniach Operacyjnych; Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej: Katowice, Poland, 2005; p. 135. [Google Scholar]
- Brzeziński, J.M. Metodologia Badań Społecznych; Wydawnictwo Zysk i Ska: Warszawa, Poland, 2011; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Maison, D. Jakościowe Metody Badań Marketingowych; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2015; p. 95. [Google Scholar]
- Hoque, Z.; Parker, L.D.; Covaleski, M.A.; Haynes, K. The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2017; p. 321. [Google Scholar]
- Colin, N.; Sorrell, S.; Polzin, F. Catalysing the energy service market: The role of intermediaries. Energy Policy 2016, 98, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ceglia, F.; Esposito, P.; Marrasso, E.; Sasso, M. From smart energy community to smart energymunicipalities: Literature review, agendas and pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughan, A. UN climate change summit. New Sci. 2019, 243, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pyatkina, D.; Shcherbina, T.; Samusenkov, V.; Razinkina, I.; Sroka, M. Modeling and Management of Power Supply Enterprises’ Cash Flows. Energies 2021, 14, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertomeu, J. Machine learning improves accounting: Discussion, implementation and research opportunities. Rev. Account. Stud. 2020, 25, 1135–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.; Vasarhelyi, M.A.; Sun, T.; Zhang, C. Learning from Machine Learning in Accounting and Assurance. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 2020, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Lev, B.; Peng, X.; Sun, T.; Vasarhelyi, M.A. Machine learning improves accounting estimates: Evidence from insurance payments. Rev. Account. Stud. 2020, 25, 1098–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulianne, E. Revisiting fit between AIS design and performance with the analyzer strategic type. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2007, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Januszewski, A.; Kujawski, J.; Buchalska-Sugajska, N. Benefits of and obstacles to RPA implementation in accounting firms. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 4672–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nespeca, A.; Chiucchi, M.S. The Impact of Business Intelligence Systems on Management Accounting. Systems: The Consultant’s Perspective. In Network, Smart and Open; Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Chandel, S.S. Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bratnicki, M.; Dyduch, W. Understanding Cognitive Biases in Strategic Decisions for Value Creation and Capture. In Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0; Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A., Staniec, I., Eds.; Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belfo, F.; Trigo, A.; Estebanez, R.P. Impact of ICT innovative momentum on real-time, Accounting. Bus. Syst. Res. J. 2015, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, T.J. The performance effect of computer mediated communication and decentralized strategic decision making. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimmel, P.D.; Weygandt, J.J.; Kieso, D.E. Financial Accounting-Tools For Business Decision Making, 9th Edition; Kimmel, P.D., Weygandt, J.J., Kieso, D.E., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- Bhimani, A.; Datar, S.; Horngren, C.; Rajan, M. Management and Cost Accounting, 7th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Eierle, B.; Schultze, W. The Role of Management as a User of Accounting Information: Implications for Standard Setting. Account. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2013, 12, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beatriz García Osma, B.G.; Jacobo Gomez-Conde, J.; Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras, E. Management control systems and real earnings management: Effects on firm performance. Manag. Account. Res. 2022, 55, 100781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, I.E.; Garnsey, M.R.; Hughes, M.D. Natural Language Processing in accounting, auditing and finance: A synthesis of the literature with a roadmap for future research. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Account. Financ. Manag. 2016, 23, 157–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palizban, O.; Kauhaniemi, K. Energy storage systems in modern grids—Matrix of technologies and applications. J. Energy Storage 2016, 6, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nardo, D.M. Developing a Conceptual Framework Model of Industry 4.0 for Industrial Management. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst. 2020, 19, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Future of Digitization in the Energy Sector (In Polish). Available online: https://transformacja2050.pl/project/cyfryzacja-wenergetyce-analiza/ (accessed on 8 August 2022).
Concept | Description |
---|---|
Kaizen | A concept of continuous efficiency improvement and streamlining, engaging all employees, regardless of the level, in the search of ideas to optimize every area in the organization, with the aim of eliminating errors and implementing innovations. |
5S | The method is intended to establish and maintain workplace order and discipline. Its implementation establishes a work environment conducive to pro-quality activity and promotes harmonious work and continuous improvement of interpersonal relations, which positively impact overall organizational efficiency. The term “5S” derives from the Japanese words seiri—tidiness, seiton—orderliness, seiso—cleanliness, seiketsu—standardization, shitsuke—discipline. Adherence to the 5S concept improves productivity, reduces costs, and increases work safety and employee engagement. |
FMEA Failure Mode and Effect (Critical) Analysis | The method is intended to identify and assess the risks associated with the weaknesses in production planning, designing, and manufacturing processes, thereby significantly reducing the risks. Application of the method enables improvement of the quality of the services provided, improvement of the reliability of the products offered, better adaptation to the customer requirements, reduction of costs, and reduction in the number of complaints and defective product claims. The concept deepens employee integration and teamwork as well as improving the flow of information in the organization. |
Just in Time | The concept assumes provision of all the components necessary in each production process, at the required time, in the required quantity. Its implementation ensures reduction of inventory levels, lower warehousing costs, improved product quality and minimized costs of product inspection, higher standard of service to customers, reduced lead times, and maximized production efficiency. |
Model Taguchi | The use of modern production technologies enabling elimination of deviations, from the values desired, in the level of product/service quality and in manufacturing/assembly/service-delivery processes. It is used to optimize new products/services/processes or to improve the existing ones. |
Kaban Method | A method of workflow management and business process visualization. It is used to optimize work and processes, improve efficiency, and minimize waste, on the basis of reports and analysis. In modern enterprises, Kanban systems are computerized systems. |
Canvas | The concept consists of nine elements: customer segments, customer value proposition, sales and service channels, customer relationships, key processes, key resources, partner ties, revenue streams, and cost structure. It is a business strategy used in new product/service launching. |
QFD Quality Function Deployment | The method is intended to translate the customer needs and expectations into the quality of the products/services offered, and the customer needs into technical product/service parameters. It involves market research, development research, invention, new concept design, prototype testing, and product testing and service. |
Small Extent * | Large Extent | Hager Polo Ltd. | Very Large Extent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable costing | 25% | 33% | x | 17% |
Activity-based costing | 8% | 50% | x | 33% |
Product life cycle costing | 25% | 50% | x | 0% |
Target costing | 17% | 33% | x | 33% |
Quality costing | 25% | 50% | x | 0% |
Operational budgeting | 17% | 33% | x | 33% |
Financial budgeting | 8% | 50% | x | 33% |
Strategic scorecard | 25% | 33% | x | 17% |
Small Extent * | Large Extent | Hager Polo Ltd. | Very Large Extent | Hager Polo Ltd. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable costing | 13% | 0% | 33% | x | |
Activity-based costing | 25% | 33% | x | 17% | |
Product life cycle costing | 25% | 33% | 17% | ||
Target costing | 25% | 33% | 17% | ||
Quality costing | 17% | 50% | x | 17% | |
Operational budgeting | 8% | 17% | 67% | x | |
Financial budgeting | 17% | 50% | x | 17% | |
Strategic scorecard | 42% | 17% | 0% |
Very Important | Hager Polo Ltd. | Decidedly Most Important | Hager Polo Ltd. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue analysis | 50% | 50% | x | |
Sales analysis | 33% | 67% | x | |
Financial ratio analysis | 33% | 67% | x | |
Coverage margin analysis | 50% | x | 50% | |
Cost analysis | 33% | 67% | x | |
Profit analysis | 33% | 67% | x |
Very Small and Small Extent * | Large Extent | Hager Polo Ltd. | Very Large Extent | Hager Polo Ltd. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable costing | 17% | 17% | 17% | x | |
Activity-based costing | 17% | 50% | x | 17% | |
Product life cycle costing | 33% | 33% | x | 0% | |
Target costing | 33% | 33% | x | 17% | |
Quality costing | 17% | 50% | x | 0% | |
Operational budgeting | 0% | 33% | 17% | x | |
Financial budgeting | 0% | 33% | x | 33% | |
Strategic scorecard | 33% | 17% | x | 33% |
Introductory Interview Questions | Answers: |
---|---|
Position in the enterprise | Chief Sales Officer |
Duties/responsibilities | Team management, participation in board meetings, daily communication with employees, contacts with contractors, developing company plans, accounting, reporting, substantive and product support for employees, participation in international projects. |
Main interview questions | Answers: |
Strategic decisions made in the enterprise in the last 3 years | Development and expansion of the related product offer with renewable energy sources and intelligent energy management in enterprises, houses or cities, energy-saving services, and products, introducing changes in the organizational structure and management, and implementation of international projects. |
Business planning decisions for the upcoming 1 year, 2–3 years, and over 3 years | To shorten planning time due to the uncertainty of the external environment, there was implementation of investment processes over 3 years, demand for information up to 1 year, and planning and financial and operational budgets for 2–3 years. |
Application of management accounting tools in managing an energy entity | In the implementation of the management function in the Hager Polo Ltd. energy company, management accounting tools are used for control purposes. They use target and quality costing in planning new products and activities. According to the manager, management accounting tools are not used in motivating and organizing. |
The use of management accounting tools in making strategic decisions | In strategic management, management accounting tools are used to a large extent. The controlling department is responsible for the development of analyses with the use of information from the management accounting system. |
The use of management accounting tools in making operational decisions | In day-to-day management, managers operate on financial and operational budgets, for the implementation of which they are accountable for. They have access to and analyze monthly information and use activity-based costing. These reports are prepared by the controlling department. |
Management Function | Managerial Accounting Tool Use |
---|---|
Organizing |
|
Leading |
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Posadzińska, I.; Grzeszczak, M. Management Accounting System in the Management of an Intelligent Energy Sector Enterprise. Energies 2022, 15, 7633. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207633
Posadzińska I, Grzeszczak M. Management Accounting System in the Management of an Intelligent Energy Sector Enterprise. Energies. 2022; 15(20):7633. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207633
Chicago/Turabian StylePosadzińska, Iwona, and Małgorzata Grzeszczak. 2022. "Management Accounting System in the Management of an Intelligent Energy Sector Enterprise" Energies 15, no. 20: 7633. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207633
APA StylePosadzińska, I., & Grzeszczak, M. (2022). Management Accounting System in the Management of an Intelligent Energy Sector Enterprise. Energies, 15(20), 7633. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207633