Next Article in Journal
Study on Top Hierarchy Control Strategy of AEBS over Regenerative Brake and Hydraulic Brake for Hub Motor Drive BEVs
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards GreenPLM—Key Sustainable Indicators Selection and Assessment Method Development
Previous Article in Journal
An Adaptive Strategy for Medium-Term Electricity Consumption Forecasting for Highly Unpredictable Scenarios: Case Study Quito, Ecuador during the Two First Years of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internet Users’ Approach to HRM Portals in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Comparative Analysis of Poland and Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Management of Healthcare Settings’ Personnel Based on Intelligent Project-Oriented Approach for Post-War Development

1
Project Management in Urban Management and Construction Department, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine
2
Mathematical Modeling and Artificial Intelligence Department, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, 61072 Kharkiv, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(22), 8381; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228381
Submission received: 10 October 2022 / Revised: 27 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development: Policies, Challenges, and Further)

Abstract

:
The paper considers the transformation of human resource management processes in the healthcare settings of Ukraine in the context of war and the COVID-19 pandemic. It is noted that the unstable and hostile environment of a healthcare setting during times of crisis leads to the need to change the personnel selection and team formation model to increase the adaptability and resilience of human resources involved in the provision of medical care. The key features of the human resource management process in a turbulent environment are the high migration activity of personnel, which leads to the need to reallocate resources, the need to operate under severe financial constraints, and the need to consider personnel as a non-renewable resource when it is impossible to attract additional resources. To ensure the reliability of the functioning of a medical institution, the transformation of human resource management processes should be based on strategic agility and human resource management, organizational resilience as a resource-based capability, corporate sustainability, and transformation of enterprises’ resources, which can be achieved by applying methodological support for resource management in a multi-project environment. Considering a network of medical institutions as a multi-project environment will allow using the methodology of project-oriented resource management, forming adaptive teams in a multi-project environment, to ensure flexible redistribution of resources both within a single institution and within a network of institutions. It is proposed to use formal transformations to manage a medical institution’s human resources. Applying the proposed approach for managing the human resources of a medical institution is considered. The formation of a project team that satisfies the minimum requirements with the maximum value of the team’s qualification score is considered. It is shown that the use of this methodological support made it possible to choose the composition of the project team with a minimum number and a maximum value of the characteristic.

1. Introduction

Healthcare settings in Ukraine are forced to operate in challenging, unstable conditions due to the Russian war and the COVID-19 pandemic.
In order to improve the sustainability of the functioning of healthcare settings, it is necessary to transform the processes of human resource management. At the same time, the transformation should provide strategic flexibility in managing human resources and organizational resilience as a resource-based capability.
Ensuring organizational sustainability can be achieved using agile approaches to management [1,2], ensuring proactive human resource management [3,4].
If, before the start of the medical reform, the staff in healthcare settings was somewhat redundant, then the reform against the backdrop of the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a shortage of personnel (a shortage of specialists of a particular specialization and qualifications) and the need to transform human resource management processes [5].
In an analysis of changes in the medical environment [6], recruiting trends in 2021–2022 showed the need to reduce personnel costs while tightening the requirements for ensuring sustainable project management [7] against the backdrop of an unbalanced labor market due to migration [8].
Formed teams must be flexible [9], adaptable [10], and resilient [11], comply with the principles of functional redundancy and ensure the organizational sustainability [12] of a medical institution. Since healthcare settings are safety-oriented systems, when forming teams, it is advisable to use specialized methodological tools, e.g., presented in the works of Zachko et al. [13], Golovatyi [14], and Ponomaryov et al. [15]. The presented models of the formation of project teams in security-oriented systems take into account the parameters of candidates’ personal human qualities and professional skills. They improve the efficiency of recruitment. However, the models do not consider the need to ensure the redistribution of resources in a multi-project environment.
Taking into account the cyclical nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and the presence of hostilities on the territory of Ukraine, the task of recruiting personnel for healthcare settings with the possibility of quickly forming teams under given functional and resource constraints is relevant.
The article aims to develop a conceptual framework for transforming human resource management processes in the healthcare settings of Ukraine in the conditions of war and the COVID-19 pandemic, based on the application of methodological support for resource management in a multi-project environment.
The further structure of the paper is as follows: Section 2, namely, current research analysis, provides an overview of up-to-date research connected with the paper. Section 3, Materials and Methods, proposes the scientific hypotheses and tasks, which will be addressed in the paper. Section 4 describes the results obtained within the research. An analysis was made of the functioning of the multi-project environment of medical institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic and hostilities. A model of project resource support in the Backus–Naur notation was built, which made it possible to formalize the requirements for human resources in a multi-project medical environment: the formation of a functionally reserved adaptive resolute team in multi-project no-nonsense healthcare settings was proposed to use the methodology of a project-oriented approach to resource management in a multi-project environment. Section 5 discusses the obtained results. The Conclusions section describes the outcomes, limitations of the study, and future research.

2. Current Research Analysis

Adam et al. [16] describe the experience of changes made to the distribution of human resources in the Center Hospitalier de Universite de Montreal (CHUM) pharmacy department. The issues of crisis management, internal communications, employee stress, reorganization of workplaces and clinical staff, remote work, and schedule management were considered. At the same time, the main changes did not concern the redistribution of duties of medical personnel and were not aimed at improving their work efficiency. The purpose of implementing the changes was primarily to improve the safety of personnel in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
A study by Amorim-Lopes et al. [17] proposes a sociotechnical methodology to account for future uncertainty in mathematical programming modeling to aid in planning for health workforce adjustments. The authors propose to create individual scripts and input parameters corresponding to the scripts, which are then used in mathematical programming models. At the same time, the proposed methodology involves experts at all stages: from developing scenarios to interpreting model results.
Paper [18] examines the redeployment of human resources for health care in conjunction with contact tracing and border control in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Barbados. The authors propose controlling the population’s contact to avoid overcrowding in medical institutions. However, the proposed approach does not consider the human and financial resources required for contact tracing, testing, and isolation management. The authors of [19] consider the complex use of resources to provide medical care, focusing on distributing doctors and medical beds. The study shows that these distributions are embedded in health systems, i.e., the ratio of doctors to beds varies for treating different diseases. At the same time, it was concluded that the distribution of human resources and beds depends on the region’s funding, and only health policy can influence this.
A study by Hafezalkotob et al. [20] proposes a collaborative game theory approach to mitigate the adverse effects of catastrophic events, minimize the expected level of hospital care, and reduce unwanted costs. At the same time, cooperation between medical centers is considered, not within one institution. Paper [21] analyzes the evolution and use of contactless healthcare services over three different periods: before, during, and after COVID-19. As a result, a conclusion was drawn about the redistribution of human resources for the hybrid provision of services for those medical services that have proven their effectiveness with contactless use. The authors analyze contactless service provision after the COVID-19 pandemic, although it is still ongoing.
Paper [22] is devoted to measures for the development of healthcare teams. At the same time, the main result of introducing such measures is to increase the psychological safety of medical workers. However, the proposed approach does not consider the medical worker’s previous experience and competencies. Paper [23] is based on the concept of intelligent hospitals. It presents an elastic distribution of human resources in medical institutions, focused on the Internet of Things model, capable of tracking the use of hospital rooms by patients and adapting the distribution of medical workers to these rooms to meet the needs of patients. The purpose of the proposed approach is to reduce the waiting time for patients in the queue, i.e., this is a supply and demand management model, and not to increase the efficiency of the use of human resources.
The authors of [24] consider the lean approach to managing human resources in healthcare. Among the main achievements of implementing the lean approach in healthcare institutions, the authors highlight the increase in job satisfaction and work autonomy.
An analysis of works [25,26] showed the need to transform human resource management processes to ensure the stable functioning of companies.
Assisting patients with COVID-19 in Ukraine is currently associated with specific problems that negatively affect the fight against COVID-19:
  • War;
  • Hostile environment for the functioning of medical institutions;
  • Destruction of medical facilities;
  • Insufficient supply of medicines to hospitals;
  • Lack of the required number of medical staff with the necessary qualifications;
  • Uncontrolled population migration;
  • Non-compliance with personal protective measures;
  • The impossibility of assisting at the primary level in the territories where hostilities are taking place;
  • Re-profiling of hospitals.
PMI notes [27] that most companies, in the course of their work, face the problems of implementing projects in an unstable environment; thus, it is advisable to direct efforts towards combining the attributes of adaptability and resilience (persistence). Regarding human resource management, adaptability refers to the team’s ability to respond to changing conditions. With this approach, aspects such as the ability to accept changes and recover from setbacks are taken into account when determining resilience.
Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on management processes, given in [28], showed that to ensure the viability of an organization, it is necessary to implement opportunity agility and planning agility. Indeed, there might be a positive relationship between the adverse impact of the pandemic on enterprises and their agility. The stronger the impact of the pandemic on the organization, the higher will be the opportunity agility and planning agility.
Table 1 provides an analysis of models for ensuring the adaptability and resilience of project teams.
Some authors, such as Williams et al. (2017) [32] consider organizational sustainability as the foundation for the development of an organization during a crisis.
Increasing the adaptability and resilience of the project team facilitates the delivery of planned values under given time and financial constraints.
The process of transitioning the project team from the current state to a resource state capable of achieving the desired planned values can be carried out by implementing change management (enablement) [1].
Adaptive approaches are helpful when requirements are subject to high uncertainty and volatility and can change throughout the project’s life, which most accurately characterizes project management during wartime [1,27].
An adaptive approach to human resource management uses iterative and incremental approaches [38,39].
A study of systemic risks and their impact on organizational management was presented by Wever et al. in [40]. Jahn et al. [41] made it possible to form a register of triggers to identify potentially dangerous risks in the medical field.
Federico Trigos and Mario Doria (2021) note that applying the Transdisciplinary Flextime Hiring Method to the service sector is advisable. Applying this method, based on the concept of organizational design, will allow service companies to justify and implement a flexible schedule based on cost reduction and increase employee satisfaction and commitment [42].
Khatun et al. (2021) [43] consider the application of a static and dynamic resource allocation strategy between projects in a multi-project environment. It is proposed to use a dynamic approach to redistribute resources, in which resources are distributed from the shared pool of a multi-project environment.
When forming a staff of medical workers in stable operating conditions, it is advisable to use recruitment methods that allow you to create highly effective teams, considering the organizational structure [44,45].
Podra and Petryshyn [46] focus on the effectiveness of modern human resource management technologies based on the high involvement approach to human resource management—“HIHRM” and “Hay Group” as a tool for evaluating the results of work with human resources.
An analysis of the tasks of personnel management is presented in Table 2.
The provision of medical services is associated with a number of features that reflect the emerging resource conflicts shown in Table 3.
Changes in the requirements for the staff of medical institutions providing medical care for COVID-19 may occur due to changes in the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine decree on the introduction of quarantine [56]. At the time of writing, it depends on:
  • the number of cases per 100,000 population (if we consider an oblast, then the quarantine level applies to the entire oblast);
  • occupancy in the area of oxygen beds (more than 65%—orange/red zone);
  • number of hospitalizations;
  • an increase in hospitalizations in 7 days compared to the previous 7 days.
When determining the requirements for candidates for the project team and forming an agreed list of requirements, it is advisable to use the techniques described in [57], adapting them to the functioning conditions of medical institutions in Ukraine.
Thus, the analysis of the current state of research has shown that it is necessary to consider healthcare settings as safety-oriented systems to ensure the sustainable functioning of the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic in war conditions. The task of personnel management remains relevant and can be solved by transforming existing human resource management processes (in particular, building functionally redundant adaptive, resilient teams).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Methodology

The paper uses a project-oriented resource management methodology to form adaptive teams in a multi-project environment.
Scientific hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Considering the network of medical institutions as a multi-project environment operating with a given pool of resources will allow the application of methodological tools for project and program management in human resource management.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
Recruiting personnel for medical institutions with the ability to quickly form teams under given functional and resource constraints caused by COVID-19 and military operations on the territory of Ukraine can be solved by introducing a project-oriented approach to resource management in a multi-project environment.
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Using a donor-acceptor approach will ensure the transfer of resources between projects to increase the adaptability and resilience of teams and the viability of a medical institution.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
Forming an adaptive, functionally redundant team will make it possible to provide both cold and hot backup, ensuring the redistribution of resources within the medical institution and in the district, regional, and national network of medical institutions.
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
In order to reduce the influence of the subjective factor and eliminate the corruption component in the formation of project teams, it is proposed to use a software package to form adaptive functionally redundant teams.
Figure 1 demonstrates the research framework presented for this study.
The paper solves the following tasks:
  • Formalization of the recruitment process for healthcare settings;
  • Formation of medical teams, taking into account the restrictions on requirements;
  • Ensuring that teams become more resilient and adaptive as resource requirements change.

3.2. Conceptual Framework

When forming a staff of medical workers in stable operating conditions, it is advisable to use recruitment methods to create highly effective teams. However, given the Russian war in Ukraine and during the formation of brigades, the following features were revealed:
  • a sharp reduction in the number of medical workers (both due to mobilization and migration (internal and external));
  • a rapid change in the competence profile of medical personnel, taking into account the territorial sign (decrease in the level of qualification of personnel in Kharkiv due to the migration of highly qualified specialists to the west of Ukraine and abroad, raising the level of qualifications in the west of Ukraine. At the same time, the medical personnel who remained in Kharkiv acquired unique skills in providing medical care and management of patients with COVID-19 through an affordable set of medicines (phase of active hostilities in February-March 2022);
  • inability to arrive at the place of work (lack of transport);
  • selection of shifts, taking into account the possibility of transporting medical personnel (most of the medical personnel who remained to work in Kharkiv lived in the region, which led to the need to reduce the number of shifts and increase the duration of shifts so as not to expose personnel to the risk of shelling when traveling to and from work);
  • lack of differentiation between anesthesia and therapeutic teams due to lack of staff and the inability to ensure the separation of infectious and non-infectious patients. In destroyed hospitals, with an insufficient number of personnel and the need to ensure evacuation to shelters during air raids and shelling, there was a problem in ensuring quarantine restrictions;
  • lack of highly specialized doctors in the hospital and the need to involve doctors from other medical institutions for consultation or transport patients for consultation (which contributes to the spread of infectious diseases and nosocomial infections);
  • the impossibility of online consultations by family doctors due to lack of Internet access and electricity.
The presence of specific restrictions leads to the fact that when managing personnel in wartime, it is necessary to provide a comprehensive solution to the problems of managing a structure, a composition, and stability of composition.
The limiting factor is a high degree of uncertainty due to military operations in some regions of Ukraine. The number of medical institutions ready to provide medical care and their technical condition (destruction of buildings, damage to critical infrastructure, damage to oxygen lines, energy supply systems, and water supply systems) changed under the influence of a hostile environment, which entails the transfer of patients and changes in the staff of a medical institution.
According to the regulatory framework, teams to work with patients with COVID-19 can only be formed from employees of hospitals where appropriate departments operate. Over the past year, the number of employees in medical institutions in Kharkiv has decreased by 2000 people, so there is not enough staff in ordinary departments. The situation has become even more aggravated considering the hostilities.
According to the National Health Service of Ukraine, anesthesiologists, cardiologists, therapists, nurses, and junior medical staff are needed in COVID teams. In addition, following the order on the organization of measures to minimize the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), during the diagnostics [58], the teams must include a driver and at least one medical worker who is not associated with the provision of emergency medical care. Thus, when forming COVID teams (mobile teams), restrictions on attracting employees to teams following qualification and competence restrictions are significant.
Requirements regarding the level of doctors and their professional competence must be considered when forming medical teams for COVID response since this is a significant limitation for allocating COVID resources to hospitals that can deal with this. In conditions of congestion, it becomes necessary to combine medical workers from different medical institutions in a team.
The network of medical institutions can be represented as a multi-project environment (Figure 2).
Multi-project management is the management of a group of projects, programs, and portfolios of projects carried out by one or more industry organizations in a certain period to achieve the industry’s strategic goals or a certain circle of stakeholders [59,60].
With this approach, the i-th project can be the functioning of the i-th medical institution under given resource and time constraints. Since the work is carried out in a hostile environment (COVID-19, military operations), applying a project-oriented approach to human resource management is appropriate and contributes to improving the quality of medical care through the formation of adaptive functionally-reserved project teams.
If decomposition is necessary, it is possible to consider the work of particular areas (departments) as a project (mass individualization).
To formalize the process of determining the requirements for human resources, it is proposed to use the Backus–Naur form. A model of project resource support in the Backus–Naur notation was built, which made it possible to formalize the requirements for human resources in a multi-project medical environment:
<multi-project environments of healthcare settings> ::= <project 1> <project 2> ... <project n>
<multi-project team> ::= <multiproject management team> <project 1 team> <project 2 team> ... <project n team>
<multiproject resource> ::= <multiproject external resource> <multiproject own resource>
<external resource of multiproject> ::= <external resource of project 1> ... <external resource of project i> ... <external resource of project n>
<own resource> ::= <project 1 own resource> ... <project i own resource> ... <project n own resource>
<competency profile of the multi-project team> ::= <competency profile of the multi-project management team> <competency profile of the project team 1>...<competence profile of the project team i>... <competency profile of the project team n> <change trends competency profile of multi-project teams>.
<multi-project resource constraints> ::= <multi-project external resource constraints> <multi-project internal resource constraints> <multi-project temporary resource constraints> <permanent multi-project resource constraints> <resource restrictions>
<multi-project external resource constraints> ::= <project 1 external resource constraints> ... < project i external resource constraints> ... <project n external resource constraints>
<internal resource constraints of a multi-project> ::= <internal resource constraints of project 1> ... <internal resource constraints of project i> ... <internal resource constraints of project n>
<resource restrictions> ::= <combination restrictions> <conflict of interest> <regulatory framework><stakeholder conflict of interest><temporary suspension>.
Under temporary resource constraints in the multi-project environment of healthcare settings in Ukraine, we can consider logistics (restriction in the possibility of attracting employees due to lack of transport communications), suspension for a period of illness, and occupation. Under constant resource constraints, we will consider the regulatory framework of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and the National Health Service.
When describing an external resource of a multi-project, it should be noted that the issue is not a simple union of external resources of projects since the external resource for the i-th project can be the internal resource for the j-th project. Further detailing of resources will allow taking into account their type, qualifications, load level, etc.
In general, redistributing resources can be solved by applying a donor-acceptor approach to human resource management. In this case, some projects will act as donors for other projects within the same medical institution and within the framework of a multi-project environment.
Using a donor-acceptor approach will ensure the transfer of resources between projects to increase the adaptability and resilience of teams and the viability of a medical institution.
Let us introduce the following notation:
  • n is the number of performers;
  • m is the number of functions;
  • Q = {q1, q2, ..., qn} is a set of performers;
  • A = {a1, a2, ..., am} is a a set of functions.
The modified responsibility matrix C indicates the ability of the performers to implement the relevant functions. The value cij indicates the characteristics of the i-th executor in implementing the j-th function. cij > 0 if the i-th worker can perform the j-th function with the given characteristic cij, cij = 0 if the i-th worker cannot perform the j-th function.
A group of performers or a group (denoted by G) is a subset of performers H = {h1, ..., ht} ∈Q that implement a subset of functions F = {f1, …, ft} ∈A.
Two groups G1 and G2 are called H equivalent (denoted by G 1 H G 2 ) if H1 = H2. H equivalent types are described using a type representative (composition of the group), formed by the lexicographic ordering of the numbers of performers included in the set H.
The operation of selecting performers that implement the j-th function (A (Q, j)):
A(Q, j) = q1jr1j v … v qijrij v … v qnjrnj.
Definition of groups that do not intersect (⊗):
G1 ⊗ G2 = G1 χ G2, if H1 ∩ H2 = ∅, and G1 ⊗ G2 = G0 otherwise.
The operation of selecting groups containing the desired combination of performers (Δ):
G1 Δ G2 = G1, if H2 ∈ H1, and G1 Δ G2 = G0 otherwise.
The paper uses the mathematical apparatus of the project-oriented resource management methodology for the formation of adaptive teams in a multi-project environment [60].
Functional transformation of H-equivalent groups:
Let there be two groups of workers G1 and G2 with a set of workers H = {h1, …, ht} and functions F1 = {f11, …, f1t} i F2 = {f21, …, f2t} implemented by them. The functional transformation of H-equivalent groups reflects the changes in the functions performed by the performers during the transition of the G1 group to the G2 group, and is described as follows:
Φ(G1→G2) = (ϕ1, … ϕt),
where ϕi describes the change of functions by the i-th executor (f1i→f2i). If f1i = f2i, then ϕI = 0.
The number of performers changing their functions Lф and changing the characteristics of the group Xф is determined as follows:
X Φ = i = 1 t ( C i , f i 1 C i , f i 2 ) , L Φ = i = 1 t sgn ( | C i , f i 1 C i , f i 2 | ) .
An adaptive approach to building and changing the work schedule provides for the restructuring of the project plan when various events occur:
  • Reducing the availability of the performer;
  • The inability of the executor to perform his functions (illness, injury, death, mobilization, migration);
  • Limited availability (temporary disability, temporary exceptions);
  • Changing tasks;
  • Changing the conditions for the functioning of a medical institution;
  • Changing deadlines or priorities.
Each action in the project requires resources to implement. Renewable (non-limited resources), non-renewable and limited resources attracted the most significant attention of researchers.
While renewable resources are periodically updated and can be attracted to projects from the external environment (incorporation, outsourcing, outstaffing), and their limited number may vary from one period to another, non-renewable resources are limited within the horizons of the project, and attraction of external resources is not allowed.
Depending on the task being solved, human resources can be considered renewable or non-renewable.
The composition of the team is considered irreplaceable. That is, the analysis of the possibility of solving the problem within the limits of the current composition of the team is carried out. A new H-equivalent group is formed with a new distribution of functions. At the same time, the functional changes in the group must cause the least number of reallocations of functions (schedule adaptations). If the functionality of the team members is “exhausted” and they cannot solve the problem, it is necessary to attract additional resources.
Consider changing functional responsibilities with a constant team composition (for example, when some performers cannot perform certain functions).
Consider a project team consisting of a set of executors H = {h1, …, ht}∈Q, which implement the corresponding functions F = {f1, …, ft}∈A and are described by the group GK = qh1f1qh2f2…qhtft.
The set of performers H = {h1,…,ht} included in the project team can implement various functions that correspond to H-equivalent groups. The constructive enumeration of which ∏k is described as follows:
k = χ j = 1 m A ( Q , j ) .
The existing restrictions can be represented as follows:
= G1 v … v Gz,
where z is the number of groups included in ∏.
The solution of the problem:
  • A constructive enumeration of groups is carried out, taking into account the restrictions:
Φ = χ j = 1 m A ( Q , j ) Θ ( v μ = 1 z G μ )   =   i = 1 s   G i Φ .
2.
Functional transformations of H-equivalent groups of the form Φ(Gk→GiΦ) are considered. For each functional transformation, the number of performers is determined, changing their functions Liф and the characteristics of the group Xiф, i =1, …, s, and the preferred option is selected according to the given parameters.

4. Results

4.1. Collecting Initial Data

Resource requirements for hospitals serving COVID-19 patients are determined based on an analysis of the conditions for the functioning of health settings, the level of bed occupancy belonging to a particular quarantine zone of the region, and recommendations from the National Health Service of Ukraine. Correction of resource requirements when solving the problem of forming a project team in a multi-project environment is carried out based on monitoring the current state of the functioning object, taking into account regular resource audits.

4.2. Processing the Data

Let us consider an example.
Input data:
Initial data: 14 team members, 6 functions to be performed within one medical institution.
Task: form a project team that meets the requirements of the tasks with the maximum value of the team’s qualification score.
The modified competency matrix, taking into account the qualification assessment of the project team members, is shown in Table 4.
Redundancy requirements are set, provided that one person performs one function:
T1 = {3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2}
Table 5 presents the results of a constructive enumeration of ∏k groups, showing options for the distribution of work by performers, taking into account the requirements for redundancy.
Table 6 shows the results of the process of constructing team formation options and the total qualification (s = 90).
A constructive enumeration of groups, taking into account the restrictions of ∏, has the form:
Φ = q12q21 q31 q44 q56 q61 q72 q83 q96 q103 q113 q125 q134 q145 v q16q21 q31 q42 q53 q61 q72 q85 q96 q103 q113 q125 q134 q144 v q12q21 q31 q42 q53 q66 q71 q83 q96 q103 q115 q125 q134 q144 v q12q21 q31 q42 q53 q66 q71 q85 q96 q103 q113 q125 q134 q144 v q12q21 q31 q42 q56 q63 q71 q85 q96 q103 q113 q125 q134 q144 v q12q24 q31 q42 q56 q63 q71 q85 q96 q103 q113 q121 q134 q145 == G1Φ v … v G6Φ.
For each functional transformation, the number of performers is determined, changing their functions Liф and the characteristics of the group Xiф, i = 1, …, s.
The optimal variant according to the criterion of total qualification is the distribution variant {2, 4, 1, 2, 6, 3, 1, 5, 6, 3, 3, 1, 4, 5}.
The graph model of the organizational structure of the project team is shown in Figure 3.
As a result of the analysis of changes in resource requirements, new requirements for redundancy were determined:
T2 = {2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2}
The results of the redistribution of project team members are shown in Table 7.
The analysis of the obtained results shows that option number 8 has the largest characteristic (87) with the least number of changes (2).
Graph models of the organizational structure of project teams for these options for the distribution of functions are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The change in the distribution of functions is represented by a dotted line.
The change in the profile of the characteristics of the project team as a result of the reallocation is shown in Table 8.

5. Discussion

The options for building a functionally redundant adaptive team in a multi-project environment of medical institutions are considered. Functional redundancy is provided by considering the stage of requirements definition, taking into account the trends in the competence profile of teams in a multi-project medical environment. Adaptability and resilience are ensured by the possibility of redistributing resources between projects, both within the projects of one institution and between projects of different institutions that form the medical environment.
In the considered example, the human resource management problem is solved, and a command is received that satisfies the redundancy requirement (3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2). The maximum value of the team’s qualification score corresponds to option number 6 of the function distribution {2, 4, 1, 2, 6, 3, 1, 5, 6, 3, 3, 1, 4, 5}. The use of formal transformations in the formation of the project team showed an increase in the efficiency of the use of human resources in the formation of teams according to the classification of Patanakul and Milosevic [59]; according to the efficiency criteria, the distribution of work between the contractors in the project and the distribution of resources increased the characteristics level of the team (qualification assessment of the team) by 8%.
As a result of the analysis of changes in resource requirements (2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2), the modeling of the redistribution of performers between jobs was carried out, taking into account the initial distribution. Eight options for the redistribution of performers were found. The change in the profile of the team’s characteristics ranges from −13% (option number 1) to −2% compared to the original allocation of resources. The number of changes (the number of redistributed functions) ranges from 64% for option number 2 to 14% (option number 8) concerning the total number of functional links. Redistribution variant 8 was chosen as the optimal one (the profile of the characteristics of the project team is 90, and the number of changes is 2).
In order to reduce the influence of the subjective factor and eliminate the corruption component in the formation of project teams, it is proposed to use a software package for the formation of functionally redundant adaptive teams: “FRAT building information system” (copyright of Ukrainian Institute of Intellectual Property No. 112096), “Agile multi-project team management” (copyright of Ukrainian Institute of Intellectual Property No. 100715).

6. Conclusions

An analysis was made of the functioning of the multi-project environment of healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic and hostilities. It is proposed to use the Backus–Naur form to formalize the process of determining the requirements for human resources. It is proposed to use the methodology of a project-oriented approach to resource management in a multi-project environment to form a functionally redundant adaptive resolute team in a multi-project group of healthcare settings.
  • The scientific novelty of the proposed approach is as follows:
  • It is proposed to consider the network of healthcare settings as a multi-project environment with the subsequent application of the methodology of a project-oriented approach to resource management in a multi-project environment.
  • A model of project resource support was built in the Backus–Naur notation, which made it possible to formalize the requirements for human resources in a multi-project healthcare environment.
  • A method of forming a functionally redundant adaptive resolute team based on formal transformations in a multi-project medical environment is proposed.
The solutions obtained were tested by examples, which showed the method’s effectiveness. It is proposed to use the developed specialized software “FRAT building information system”, and “Agile multi-project team management” to automate the process of human resource management in a multi-project medical environment.
The proposed approach acquires particular relevance in the context of Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine and the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Unpredictable changes in energy systems and the uncertainty of available resources dictate the need to implement automated solutions for reallocating resources in critical infrastructure institutions.
Future Research: A promising area of research is the development of instrumental decision-making support in forming a project team with functional redundancy for sustainable project management. The proposed ideas can be used in the flexible transformation of human resource management processes in a multi-project healthcare environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D. and D.C.; methodology, N.D. and D.C.; software, N.D. and I.C.; validation, N.D., D.C., Y.H. and N.K.; formal analysis, N.D., D.C., Y.H. and I.C.; investigation, N.D., D.C. and I.C.; resources, N.D., D.C. and I.C.; data curation, N.D., D.C. and Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.D. and D.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.H., N.K. and I.C.; visualization, N.D. and D.C.; supervision, I.C.; project administration, I.C.; funding acquisition, D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) Seventh Edition and the Standard for Project Management; Project Management Institute: Newton Square, PA, USA, 2021.
  2. Project Management Institute. Beyond Agility: Flex to the Future. Pulse of the Profession®. 2021. Available online: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/beyond-agility-gymnastic-enterprises-12973 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  3. Williams, H.M.; Parker, S.K.; Turner, N. Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2010, 83, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cangiano, F.; Parker, S.K.; Ouyang, K. Too proactive to switch off: When taking charge drains resources and impairs detachment. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2021, 26, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bazilyuk, A.; Khomenko, V. Human Capital of Ukraine: Essence, Investment and Development. Transform. Econ. Financ. Manag. Mod. Cond. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. The Healthcare Technology Trends We Can Expect to Boom in 2022 and Beyond. Available online: https://seclifesciences.com/blog/2021/12/the-healthcare-technology-trends-we-can-expect-to-boom-in-2022-and-beyond (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  7. 11 Trends in Recruiting Which Should Be Considered. Available online: https://ain.ua/2021/03/21/11-trendov-v-rekrutinge-2021/ (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  8. Operational Data Portal. Ukraine Refugee Situation of United Nations. Available online: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  9. Cunha, M.P.; Gomes, E.; Mellahi, K.; Miner, A.S.; Rego, A. Strategic agility through improvisational capabilities: Implications for a paradox-sensitive HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mithani, M.A. Adaptation in the face of the new normal. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 508–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Knight, C.; Keller, A.C.; Parker, S.K. Job demands, not resources, predict worsening psychological distress during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Work. Stress 2022, 1–23. Work Stress 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Renko, M.; Bullough, A.; Saeed, S. How do resilience and self-efficacy relate to entrepreneurial intentions in countries with varying degrees of fragility? A six-country study. Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep. 2021, 39, 130–156. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zachko, O.; Kobylkin, D.; Kovalchuk, O. Models of project teams’ formation in a safety-oriented systems. Innov. Technol. Sci. Solut. Ind. 2019, 4, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zachko, O.B.; Golovatyi, R.R.; Kobylkin, D.S. Models of safety management in development projects. In Proceedings of the Materials of 2019 IEEE 14th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT 2019), Lviv, Ukraine, 17–20 September 2019; Volume 3, pp. 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ponomaryov, O.S.; Grinchenko, M.A.; Lobach, O.V. Reliability as a characteristic of the project team. Innov. Technol. Sci. Solut. Ind. 2018, 4, 154–160. [Google Scholar]
  16. Adam, J.P.; Khazaka, M.; Charikhi, F.; Clervil, M.; Huot, D.D.; Jebailey, J.; Pascal, O.; Morin, J.; Langevin, M.C. Management of human resources of a pharmacy department during the COVID-19 pandemic: Take-aways from the first wave. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2021, 17, 1990–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amorin-Lopes, M.; Oliveira, M.; Raposo, M.; Cardoso-Grilo, T.; Alvarenga, A.; Barbas, M.; Alves, M.; Vieira, A.; Barbosa-Povoa, A. Enhancing optimization planning models for health human resources management with foresight. Omega 2021, 103, 102384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sobers, N.P.; Howitt, C.H.; Jeyaseelan, S.M.; Greaves, N.S.; Harewood, H.; Murphy, M.M.; Quimby, K.; Hambleton, I.R. Impact of COVID-19 contact tracing on human resources for health—A Caribbean perspective. Prev. Med. Rep. 2021, 22, 101367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, X.; He, S.; Webster, C.; Yu, M. Divergent distributions of physicians and healthcare beds in China: Changing patterns, driving forces, and policy implications. Appl. Geogr. 2022, 138, 102626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hafezalkotob, A.; Fardi, K.; Aickelin, U.; Chaharbaghi, S.; Khorshidi, H.A. A cooperative robust human resource allocation problem for healthcare systems for disaster management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 170, 108283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.M.; Lee, D.H. Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 era. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 167, 120712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zajac, S.; Holladay, C.L.; Tannenbaum, S.; Salas, E. Building effective healthcare team development interventions in uncertain times: Tips for success. Organ. Dyn. 2022, 51, 100824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fischer, G.S.; Righi, R.R.; Ramos, G.O.; da Costa, C.A.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. ElHealth: Using Internet of Things and data prediction for elastic management of human resources in smart hospitals. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2020, 87, 103285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bektas, G.; Kiper, F. Applications of lean in human resourecs management in healthcare. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2022, 72, 532–536. [Google Scholar]
  25. Belas, J.; Gavrova, B.; Dvorsky, J.; Cepel, M.; Durana, P. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on selected areas of a management system in SMEs. Econ. Res. 2021, 35, 3754–3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartik, A.W.; Bertrand, M.; Cullen, Z.; Glaeser, E.L.; Luca, M.; Stanton, C. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 17656–17666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. The Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge; Project Management Institute: Newton Square, PA, USA, 2021.
  28. Stephan, U.; Zbierowski, P.; Pérez-Luño, A.; Wach, D.; Wiklund, J.; Cabañas, M.A.; Barki, E.; Benzari, A.; Bernhard-Oettel, C.; Boekhorst, J.A.; et al. Agility, and Entrepreneur Wellbeing across Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2022, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahammad, M.F.; Glaister, K.W.; Gomes, E. Strategic agility and human resource management. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ambituuni, A.; Azizsafaei, F.; Keegan, A. HRM operational models and practices to enable strategic agility in PBOs: Managing paradoxical tensions. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Anwar, A.; Coviello, N.; Rouziou, M. Weathering a crisis: A multi-level analysis of resilience in young ventures. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2021, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Williams, T.A.; Gruber, D.A.; Sutcliffe, K.M.; Shepherd, D.A.; Zhao, E.Y. Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2017, 11, 733–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Linnenluecke, M.K. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2017, 19, 4–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Purwatiningsih, L.; Jamaliah, S.; Haslinda, Y.; Ancella, H.; Dewi, M. Alliance management capabilities and enterprise resilience—The mediating role of information technology capabilities: The case of Indonesia’s state-owned enterprises. Proceedings 2022, 82, 28. [Google Scholar]
  35. Afruzi, E.; Aghaie, A.; Naja, A. Robust optimization for the resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations. Sci. Iran. 2020, 27, 361–367. [Google Scholar]
  36. Heredia, J.; Rubinos, C.; Vega, W.; Heredia, W.; Flores, A. New strategies to explain organizational resilience on the firms: A cross-countries configurations approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, W.; Xi, H.; Kang, D.; Zhang, J. An agent based simulation system for multi project scheduling under uncertainty. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2018, 86, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. The Standard for Portfolio Management, 4th ed.; PA: Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2017; p. 127.
  39. The Standard for Program Management, 3rd ed.; Project Management Institute: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2013; p. 176.
  40. Wever, M.; Wognum, N.; Shah, M.; O’Leary, N.; Onofrei, G. Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach to Systemic Risk Detection. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 2021, 16, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jahn, M.; Gaupp, F.; Obersteiner, M.; Assessing and Analysing Systemic Risks: Mapping the Topology of Risk through Time. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR). UN Off. Disaster Risk Reduct. (UNDRR) 2019, 37–47. Available online: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/15928/ (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  42. Trigos, F.; Doria, M. Flexible Hiring Personnel Models to Promote Human Satisfaction and Business Profit for Service Industries. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 2021, 16, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
  43. Khatun, M.T.; Hiekata, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Okada, I. Dynamic Modeling of Resource Allocation for Project Management in Multi-Project Environment. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 2021, 16, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kolesnikova, K.; Mezentseva, O.; Kolesnikov, O.; Bronin, S. Development of a State Structure Model for a Project-Oriented Organization. Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. Comput. Technol. Algorithms Intell. Syst. 2021, 867–881. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-3246-4_66#citeas (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  45. Lukianov, D.V.; Gogunsky, V.D.; Kolesnikova, E.V. Methodology for the analysis of complex systems on the example of the competence model of project managers ICB4.0 IPMA. Sci. J. Astana IT Univ. 2020, 3, 91–110. [Google Scholar]
  46. Podra, O.; Petryshyn, N. Modern Technologies of Human Resources Management. Transform. Econ. Financ. Manag. Mod. Cond. Sci. Monogr. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gielnik, M.M.; Frese, M.; Stark, M.S. Planning and entrepreneurship. In The Psychology of Planning in Organizations: Research and Applications; Taylor& Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 289–311. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vranjes, I.; Van den Broeck, A. Developing MODI: A Framework for Meaningful Organizational Disconnection Policies. In Proceedings of the Journal of Management Studies Conference 2022, Cambridge, UK, 19–21 September 2022. [Google Scholar]
  49. Boğan, E.; Sarıışık, M. Organization-related determinants of employees’ CSR motive attributions and affective commitment in hospitality companies. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Smith, N.; Tessier, D.; Tzioumakis, Y.; Quested, E.; Appleton, P.; Sarrazin, P.; Papaioannou, A.; Duda, J.L. Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Motivational Climate Observation System. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2015, 37, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kreter, S.; Rieck, J.; Zimmermann, J. Models and solution procedures for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with general temporal constraints and calendars. Eur. Oper. Res. 2016, 251, 387–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cavalcante, V.; Cardonha, C.; Herrmann, R. A Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Bounded Multitasking. IFAC Proc. Res. 2013, 46, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Potter, R.; Jamieson, S.; Jain, A.; Leka, S.; Dollard, M.; O’Keeffe, V. Evaluation of national work-related psychosocial risk management policies: An international review of the literature. Saf. Sci. 2022, 154, 105854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rusan, N.I.; Bushuev, S.D. Application of empathy and emotional intelligence for different types of teams in a pandemic condition. Bull. Natl. Tech. Univ. KhPI. Ser. Strateg. Manag. Portf. Manag. Programs Proj. 2021, 1, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bushuyev, S.; Bushuiev, D.; Bushuieva, V. Modelling of Emotional Infection to the Information System Management Project Success. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 1265, 341–352. [Google Scholar]
  56. Quarantine Regulations. Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Available online: https://covid19.gov.ua/en/quarantine-regulations (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  57. Riel, J.; Martin, R.L. Creating Great Choices: A Leader’s Guide to Integrative Thinking; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. Tarasyuk, T. Mobile Medical Team: How to Organize Activity. Med. Bus. 2020. Available online: https://www.medsprava.com.ua/article/1987-moblna-medichna-brigada-yak-organzuvati-dyalnst (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  59. Patanakul, P.; Milosevic, D. The effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects: Factors of influence and measurement criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2008, 27, 216–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dotsenko, N.; Chumachenko, D.; Chumachenko, I.; Galkin, A.; Lis, T.; Lis, M. Conceptual Framework of Sustainable Management of the Process of Forming a Project Team with Functional Redundancy. Energies 2021, 14, 8235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research framework.
Figure 1. Research framework.
Energies 15 08381 g001
Figure 2. Multi-project environment of healthcare settings.
Figure 2. Multi-project environment of healthcare settings.
Energies 15 08381 g002
Figure 3. The graph model of the organizational structure of the project team.
Figure 3. The graph model of the organizational structure of the project team.
Energies 15 08381 g003
Figure 4. Graph model of the organizational structure of the project team (distribution option 7).
Figure 4. Graph model of the organizational structure of the project team (distribution option 7).
Energies 15 08381 g004
Figure 5. Graph model of the organizational structure of the project team (distribution option 8).
Figure 5. Graph model of the organizational structure of the project team (distribution option 8).
Energies 15 08381 g005
Table 1. Analysis of models for ensuring adaptability and resilience of project teams.
Table 1. Analysis of models for ensuring adaptability and resilience of project teams.
TaskAhammad M.F., et al. (2020).
[29]
Ambituuni A., et al. (2021)
[30]
Anwar A., et al. (2021). [31]Williams T. A., et al. (2017) [32]Linnenluecke M. K. (2017) [33]Lisdiono P., et al. (2022).
[34]
Afruzi E., et al. (2020) [35]Heredia J., et al. (2022) [36]Song W., et al. (2018)
[37]
Strategic agility and human resource management+ ++ +
Improvisation, fluidity and flexibility +
Organizational resilience as a resource-based capability ++ +
Organizational sustainability ++ ++
Transformation of enterprises’ resources +++
Resource management in a multi-project environment + +
Table 2. Analysis of the tasks of human resource management.
Table 2. Analysis of the tasks of human resource management.
TaskStructureCompositionDescriptionSource
Structure managementNot determinedFixedIn the presence of a set of employees with known characteristics (fixed composition), it is required to find the optimal structure of the active system (communications and interactions between employees).[44,47]
Composition managementFixedNot determinedIt consists of determining the optimal set of employees of the active system, provided that the structure of the entire active system is set, and the management problem has already been solved.[42,47]
Fixed composition managementFixedFixedIt consists of the appointment of an optimal incentive system to achieve the best result with a fixed composition and structure.[48,49,50]
Table 3. Resource conflicts arising in healthcare settings.
Table 3. Resource conflicts arising in healthcare settings.
Type of ConflictResourceInfluenceResolution Paths
Lack of healthcare settings in a certain areamaterialInability to provide medical careRedirection of patients, provision of logistics.
Insufficient number of medical stafflaborRestriction on the possibility of receiving patients,
declining quality of service
Recruitment, consideration of a multi-project environment to attract staff from other medical institutions, external consultation [51,52]
Lack of equipmentmaterialRestriction on the possibility of receiving patients,
declining quality of service
Purchase (leasing) of equipment, contacting other institutions
Limited fundingexpensesLimiting the possibility of receiving patients, reducing the quality of serviceAttracting additional funding, volunteer organizations, sponsors
Functional limitationslaborProhibition of combining functions, positions, recommendations for combining functions, etc.Personnel planning subject to constraints [51,52]
Changing staffing requirementslaborChanging the competency profile of the staff of medical institutionsPersonnel planning, taking into account the possibility of redistribution [37].
Psychological conflictslaborFunctioning under stress: external factors (war, COVID), internal (conflicts in the project team)Methods for reducing stress levels [53], methods for increasing flexibility [28], developing emotional intelligence [54,55]
Table 4. Modified competency matrix.
Table 4. Modified competency matrix.
Q/Aa1a2a3a4a5a6
q1080605
q2700600
q3604003
q4050400
q5005044
q6506004
q7750000
q8403060
q9070508
q10008050
q11007460
q12600050
q13060600
q14000670
Table 5. The results of the constructive enumeration of the groups ∏k.
Table 5. The results of the constructive enumeration of the groups ∏k.
FunctionOptionQuantityConstructive Enum
a1q2 q3 q6 q7 q8 q1220{1 1 1 0 0 0}, {1 1 0 1 0 0}, {1 1 0 0 1 0}, {1 1 0 0 0 1},{1 0 1 1 0 0}, {1 0 1 0 1 0}, {1 0 1 0 0 1}, {1 0 0 1 1 0}, {1 0 0 1 0 1}, {1 0 0 0 1 1}, {0 1 1 1 0 0}, {0 1 1 0 1 0}, {0 1 1 0 0 1}, {0 1 0 1 1 0}, {0 1 0 1 0 1}, {0 1 0 0 1 1}, {0 0 1 1 1 0}, {0 0 1 1 0 1}, {0 0 1 0 1 1}, {0 0 0 1 1 1}
a2q1 q4 q7 q9 q1310{1 1 0 0 0}, {1 0 1 0 0}, {1 0 0 1 0}, {1 0 0 0 1}, {0 1 1 0 0}, {0 1 0 1 0}, {0 1 0 0 1}, {0 0 1 1 0}, {0 0 1 0 1}, {0 0 0 1 1}
a3q3 q5 q6 q8 q10 q1120{1 1 1 0 0 0}, {1 1 0 1 0 0}, {1 1 0 0 1 0}, {1 1 0 0 0 1}, {1 0 1 1 0 0}, {1 0 1 0 1 0}, {1 0 1 0 0 1}, {1 0 0 1 1 0}, {1 0 0 1 0 1}, {1 0 0 0 1 1}, {0 1 1 1 0 0}, {0 1 1 0 1 0}, {0 1 1 0 0 1}, {0 1 0 1 1 0}, {0 1 0 1 0 1}, {0 1 0 0 1 1}, {0 0 1 1 1 0}, {0 0 1 1 0 1}, {0 0 1 0 1 1}, {0 0 0 1 1 1}
a4q1 q2 q4 q9 q10 q11 q13 q1421{1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0}, {1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0}, {1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0}, {1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0}, {1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0}, {1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1}, {0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0}, {0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0}, {0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0}, {0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0}, {0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1}, {0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0}, {0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0}, {0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0}, {0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1}, {0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0}, {0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0}, {0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1}, {0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0}, {0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1}, {0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1}
a5q5 q8 q10 q11 q12 q1415{ 1 1 0 0 0 0}, { 1 0 1 0 0 0}, { 1 0 0 1 0 0}, { 1 0 0 0 1 0}, { 1 0 0 0 0 1}, {0 1 1 0 0 0}, {0 1 0 1 0 0}, {0 1 0 0 1 0}, {0 1 0 0 0 1}, {0 0 1 1 0 0}, {0 0 1 0 1 0}, {0 0 1 0 0 1}, {0 0 0 1 1 0}, {0 0 0 1 0 1}, {0 0 0 0 1 1}
a6q1 q3 q5 q6 q910{1 1 0 0 0}, {1 0 1 0 0}, {1 0 0 1 0}, {1 0 0 0 1}, {0 1 1 0 0}, {0 1 0 1 0}, {0 1 0 0 1}, {0 0 1 1 0}, {0 0 1 0 1}, {0 0 0 1 1}
Table 6. Result of constructive enumeration subject to constraints.
Table 6. Result of constructive enumeration subject to constraints.
No. of Optionq1q2q3q4q5q6q7q8q9q10q11q12q13q14Xiф
12114612363354583
26112312563354484
32112361363554484
42112361563354488
52112631563354489
62412631563314590
Table 7. Options for redistributing functions to project teams after redistribution.
Table 7. Options for redistributing functions to project teams after redistribution.
No. of Optionq1q2q3q4q5q6q7q8q9q10q11q12q13q14Xiф
12112362365454578
22112362365554479
32112362563454584
42112362563554485
52112632563454585
62112632563554486
72412631563552487
82412632563514587
Table 8. Changing the profile of project team characteristics as a result of redeployment.
Table 8. Changing the profile of project team characteristics as a result of redeployment.
Redistribution OptionTeam Performance ProfileProfile ChangesLiф
PrimaryAfter Redistribution
19078−128
29079−119
39084−66
49085−57
59085−54
69086−45
79087−34
89087−32
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dotsenko, N.; Chumachenko, D.; Husieva, Y.; Kosenko, N.; Chumachenko, I. Sustainable Management of Healthcare Settings’ Personnel Based on Intelligent Project-Oriented Approach for Post-War Development. Energies 2022, 15, 8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228381

AMA Style

Dotsenko N, Chumachenko D, Husieva Y, Kosenko N, Chumachenko I. Sustainable Management of Healthcare Settings’ Personnel Based on Intelligent Project-Oriented Approach for Post-War Development. Energies. 2022; 15(22):8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dotsenko, Nataliia, Dmytro Chumachenko, Yuliia Husieva, Nataliia Kosenko, and Igor Chumachenko. 2022. "Sustainable Management of Healthcare Settings’ Personnel Based on Intelligent Project-Oriented Approach for Post-War Development" Energies 15, no. 22: 8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228381

APA Style

Dotsenko, N., Chumachenko, D., Husieva, Y., Kosenko, N., & Chumachenko, I. (2022). Sustainable Management of Healthcare Settings’ Personnel Based on Intelligent Project-Oriented Approach for Post-War Development. Energies, 15(22), 8381. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop