Forecasting Hydrogen Production from Wind Energy in a Suburban Environment Using Machine Learning
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Appratus
2.2. Machine Learning: Training and Testing Models
2.3. Harvesting Hydrogen from Wind Power
3. Results and Discussions
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
Swept area | |
Capacity factor | |
Power coefficient of wind turbine | |
F | Faraday’s constant |
Lower heating value | |
LSTM | Long short-term memory |
LR | Linear regression |
Current density | |
Mass of hydrogen | |
Rate of hydrogen production | |
OTEC | Ocean thermal energy conversion |
Rated power of the wind turbine | |
Output power from wind turbine | |
PEM | Proton-exchange membrane |
SVR | Support vector regression |
Efficiency of the electrolysis process |
References
- Dincer, I. Green methods for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 1954–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiari, L.; Zecca, A. Constraints of fossil fuels depletion on global warming projections. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 5026–5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtsmark, B. A comparison of the global warming effects of wood fuels and fossil fuels taking albedo into account. GCB Bioenergy 2015, 7, 984–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Durrani, A.; Khan, I.; Ahmad, M. Analysis of Electric Power Generation Growth in Pakistan: Falling into the Vicious Cycle of Coal. Eng 2021, 2, 296–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Power Systems Planning. Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan (2018-40). 2019. Available online: https://nepra.org.pk/Admission%20Notices/2019/09-September/IGCEP%20Plan%20(2018-40).pdf (accessed on 16 March 2022).
- Milanović, P. Dams and reservoirs in karst? Keep away or accept the challenges. Appl. Hydrogeol. J. 2021, 29, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, S.; Khan, S.N.; Sajid, M.; Khan, J.; Ayaz, Y.; Waqas, A. Impact and performance efficiency analysis of grid-tied solar photovoltaic system based on installation site environmental factors. Energy Environ. 2022, 0958305X221106618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasheed, B.; Safdar, A.; Sajid, M.; Ali, S.; Ayaz, Y. Assessment of solar load models for bifacial PV panels. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsuchida, S.; Nonaka, H.; Yamada, N. Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Optimal Angle Control of Tracking Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems. Energies 2022, 15, 8083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albadi, M.; El-Saadany, E. Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshy, A.M.I.; Dincer, I. A new integrated renewable energy system for clean electricity and hydrogen fuel production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 20944–20955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HassanzadehFard, H.; Tooryan, F.; Collins, E.R.; Jin, S.; Ramezani, B. Design and optimum energy management of a hybrid renewable energy system based on efficient various hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30113–30128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bičáková, O.; Straka, P. Production of hydrogen from renewable resources and its effectiveness. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 11563–11578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razi, F.; Dincer, I. A critical evaluation of potential routes of solar hydrogen production for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 264, 121582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Sheng, L.; Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, W. A review on bio-hydrogen production technology. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 3442–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, P.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, B.; Alli, B.; Ahmed, B. Using the hydrogen for sustainable energy storage: Designs, modeling, identification and simulation membrane behavior in PEM system electrolyser. J. Energy Storage 2016, 7, 270–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahil, A.; Gammon, R.; Brown, N. Techno-economic assessment of dispatchable hydrogen production by multiple elec-trolysers in Libya. J. Energy Storage 2018, 16, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taner, T.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Ozkaymak, M. Techno-economic Analysis of a More Efficient Hydrogen Generation System Prototype: A Case Study of PEM Electrolyzer with Cr-C Coated SS304 Bipolar Plates. Fuel Cells 2019, 19, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arellano-Garcia, H.; Ife, M.R.; Sanduk, M.; Sebastia-Saez, D. Hydrogen Production via Load-Matched Coupled Solar-Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Using Aqueous Methanol. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2019, 42, 2340–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazvini, M.; Sadeghzadeh, M.; Ahmadi, M.H.; Moosavi, S.; Pourfayaz, F. Geothermal energy use in hydrogen production: A review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 7823–7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haris Ishaq, O.S.; Dincer, I. Design and Analysis of a Novel Integrated Wind-Solar-OTEC Energy System for Producing Hydrogen, Electricity, and Fresh Water. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2019, 141, 061015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acar, C.; Dincer, I. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 835–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghanimadvar, M.; Shirmohammadi, R.; Sadeghzadeh, M.; Aslani, A.; Ghasempour, R. Hydrogen production technologies: Attractiveness and future perspective. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 8233–8254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzahrani, A.; Ramu, S.K.; Devarajan, G.; Vairavasundaram, I.; Vairavasundaram, S. A Review on Hydrogen-Based Hybrid Microgrid System: Topologies for Hydrogen Energy Storage, Integration, and Energy Management with Solar and Wind Energy. Energies 2022, 15, 7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, J.; Sverdrup, G.; Mann, M.K.; Maness, P.; Kroposki, B.; Ghirardi, M.; Evans, R.J.; Blake, D. Renewable hydrogen production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2008, 32, 379–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Acar, C.; Dincer, I. Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, S.A.; Sajid, M.; Iqbal, S. Forecasting hydrogen production potential in islamabad from solar energy using water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 46, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I. Analysis and optimization for energy, cost and carbon emission of a solar driven steam-autothermal hybrid methane reforming for hydrogen, ammonia and power production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Naterer, G.F. Integrated fossil fuel and solar thermal systems for hydrogen production and CO2 mitigation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 14227–14233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elsheikh, A.H.; Sharshir, S.W.; Elaziz, M.A.; Kabeel, A.; Guilan, W.; Haiou, Z. Modeling of solar energy systems using artificial neural network: A comprehensive review. Sol. Energy 2019, 180, 622–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shorabeh, S.N.; Argany, M.; Rabiei, J.; Firozjaei, H.K.; Nematollahi, O. Potential assessment of multi-renewable energy farms establishment using spatial multi-criteria de-cision analysis: A case study and mapping in Iran. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozkan, M.B.; Karagoz, P. Reducing the cost of wind resource assessment: Using a regional wind power forecasting method for assessment. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 13182–13197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsheikh, A.H.; Panchal, H.; Ahmadein, M.; Mosleh, A.O.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Alsaleh, N.A. Productivity forecasting of solar distiller integrated with evacuated tubes and external condenser using artificial intelligence model and moth-flame optimizer. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 28, 101671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, S.A.; Sajid, M.; Sajid, H.; Uddin, E.; Ayaz, Y. Deep learning and statistical methods for short- and long-term solar irradiance forecasting for Islamabad. Renew. Energy 2022, 198, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devaraj, J.; Elavarasan, R.M.; Shafiullah, G.; Jamal, T.; Khan, I. A holistic review on energy forecasting using big data and deep learning models. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 13489–13530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nafeh, A.E.-S.A. Hydrogen production from a PV/PEM electrolyzer system using a neural-network-based MPPT algorithm. Int. J. Numer. Model. Electron. Netw. Devices Fields 2011, 24, 282–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messner, J.W.; Pinson, P. Online adaptive lasso estimation in vector autoregressive models for high dimensional wind power forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 2019, 35, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manshadi, M.D.; Ghassemi, M.; Mousavi, S.; Mosavi, A.; Kovacs, L. Predicting the Parameters of Vortex Bladeless Wind Turbine Using Deep Learning Method of Long Short-Term Memory. Energies 2021, 14, 4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Solgaard, H.S.; Haider, W. Wind, hydro or mixed renewable energy source: Preference for electricity products when the share of renewable energy increases. Energy Policy 2016, 97, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Cui, Y. Multi-turbine wind-solar hybrid system. Renew. Energy 2014, 76, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabalci, E. Design and analysis of a hybrid renewable energy plant with solar and wind power. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 72, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaabeche, A.; Belhamel, M.; Ibtiouen, R. Techno-economic valuation and optimization of integrated photovoltaic/wind energy conversion system. Sol. Energy 2011, 85, 2407–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grau, L.; Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Sounding out the repowering potential of wind energy—A scenario-based assessment from Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 293, 126094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wu, M. Decision-making methodologies in offshore wind power investments: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseem, A.; Uddin, E.; Ali, Z.; Aslam, J.; Shah, S.R.; Sajid, M.; Zaidi, A.A.; Javed, A.; Younis, M.Y. Effect of vortices on power output of vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 37, 100586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I. Evaluation of a wind energy based system for co-generation of hydrogen and methanol production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15869–15877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, L.O.; Sigauke, C.; Chibaya, C.; Mbuvha, R. Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods. Algorithms 2020, 13, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asghar, R.; Ullah, Z.; Azeem, B.; Aslam, S.; Hashmi, M.H.; Rasool, E.; Shaker, B.; Anwar, M.J.; Mustafa, K. Wind Energy Potential in Pakistan: A Feasibility Study in Sindh Province. Energies 2022, 15, 8333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramasamy, K.; Ravichandran, C.S. Optimal design of renewable sources of PV /wind/ FC generation for power system reliability and cost using MA-RBFNN approach. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 10946–10962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atif, M.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A. Energy and Exergy Analyses of Recompression Brayton Cycles Integrated with a Solar Power Tower through a Two-Tank Thermal Storage System. J. Energy Eng. 2018, 144, 04018036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, H.; Zaouche, F.; Rekioua, D.; Belaid, S.; Rekioua, T.; Bacha, S. Feasibility of a standalone photovoltaic/battery system with hydrogen production. J. Energy Storage 2020, 31, 101644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trop, P.; Goricanec, D. Comparisons between energy carriers’ productions for exploiting renewable energy sources. Energy 2016, 108, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinelli, M.; Santarelli, M. Hydrogen storage alloys for stationary applications. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NRG 40H Anemometer. Available online: https://www.nrgsystems.com/products/met-sensors/anemometers/detail/40h-anemometer-hall-effect (accessed on 14 August 2020).
- Yu, Y.; Si, X.; Hu, C.; Zhang, J. A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures. Neural Comput. 2019, 31, 1235–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douak, M.; Settou, N. Estimation of Hydrogen Production Using Wind Energy in Algeria. Energy Procedia 2015, 74, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reza Ziazi, K.M.; Goudarzi, N. Techno-Economic Assessment of Utilizing Wind Energy for Hydrogen Production Through Electrolysis. In ASME Power Conference; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Şahin, A.D. Progress and recent trends in wind energy. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2004, 30, 501–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, D.; Duffy, J.; Kimble, M.; Pien, M. Solar-powered regenerative PEM electrolyzer/fuel cell system. Sol. Energy 2005, 79, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I. A comparative evaluation of OTEC, solar and wind energy based systems for clean hydrogen pro-duction. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 246, 118736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hydrogen Production | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sr. No. | Subtheme | Research Work and Findings | Reference |
1 | Analytical method to produce hydrogen | An engineering equation solver (EES) was utilized to determine the overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the hydrogen production process, and the particle swarm optimization technique was used to optimize the system. | [11,12] |
2 | Biochemical hydrogen production | Biochemical methods play an important role in hydrogen production, in addition to being environmentally friendly. BEAMR was found to be an efficient method for hydrogen production. Moreover, the rate of hydrogen production can be increased by increasing the activity of hydrogen production bacteria. | [13,14,15] |
3 | Electrolyzer for the production of hydrogen | Proton-exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers were incorporated, for hydrogen production, and multiple electrolyzers were suggested. Electrolyzer were compared, revealing that an electrolyzer with a membrane is most efficient. Hydrogen production of up to 1.2 kg/h can be achieved using a PEM electrolyzer, but with Cr-C coated SS304 bipolar plates in chemical solution, a 1 MW system was able to produce 6 m3/h. Methanol was also introduced in PEM for hydrogen production. | [16,17,18,19,20] |
4 | Hydrogen production | Multiple methodologies were presented, and mostly renewable sources were utilized to produce hydrogen as a product with some by products, such as fresh water and electricity. Moreover, the prospective and attractiveness of hydrogen production was elaborated. | [21,22,23,24,25,26,27] |
5 | Solar energy for hydrogen production | Machine learning was applied to forecast hydrogen production, yielding the Prophet model with a daily average of 93.3 × 103 kg/km2. Furthermore, a solar-driven, steam-autothermal hybrid reforming system (SAHRS) was proposed to capture the carbon emissions generated during hydrogen extraction. It was also concluded that solar energy had a considerable impact for superheating and steam generation to feed gaseous reactants. | [28,29,30,31] |
AI Applied Energy Forecast | |||
Sr. No. | Subtheme | Research Work and Findings | Reference |
1 | Forecasting framework | A forecasting framework was provided to reduce the cost of wind resource assessment, and the GIS-MCDA model was used to determine the potential placement of biomass, geothermal, solar, and wind power plants. AI methods were used to estimate the water yield through a solar distiller and solar energy production for short-term and long-term forecasting. | [32,33,34,35] |
2 | ML forecasting | Machine learning algorithms were applied to efficiently forecast energy production. Suggestions for capturing the intermittent nature of wind were also presented. A study was presented for prediction of the parameters of vortex bladeless wind turbines using LSTM. | [36,37,38,39] |
Wind Energy | |||
Sr. No. | Subtheme | Research Work and Findings | Reference |
1 | Hybrid power | Hybrid renewable energy was favored at a reasonable price when the portion of renewable energy was increased in the energy mix. Numerous analyses also confirmed that a hybrid system is superior to a single source, whereas multiple wind turbines are preferred over a traditional turbine. | [40,41,42,43] |
2 | Wind power potential | Wind energy has considerable potential, but its intermittent nature hinders the support of this source. The performance of VAWT was evaluated in the presence of bluff bodies, which showed interesting results. Furthermore, Germany has used wind sources to generate power and phased out coal-based electricity generation. Wind speed assessment was also achieved using multiple ML methods. | [44,45,46,47,48,49] |
Energy Storage | |||
Sr. No. | Subtheme | Research Work and Findings | Reference |
1 | Conventional methods | Traditionally, excess energy is stored in batteries, but such methods are not favored for sole used, owing the short life of batteries. In a hybrid system, they can be incorporated in the system for constant output. Some other methods include utilization of energy in terms of heat. | [50,51,52] |
2 | Hydrogen as a fuel | Storing excess energy in terms of hydrogen by incorporating the use of hydrogen storage alloys (HAS) is a unique idea, as it can be utilized for energy generation in remote areas. Alternatively, it can be used to manufacture chemicals that are energy carriers, such as NH3, CH4, and methanol. | [40,53,54] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Javaid, A.; Javaid, U.; Sajid, M.; Rashid, M.; Uddin, E.; Ayaz, Y.; Waqas, A. Forecasting Hydrogen Production from Wind Energy in a Suburban Environment Using Machine Learning. Energies 2022, 15, 8901. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238901
Javaid A, Javaid U, Sajid M, Rashid M, Uddin E, Ayaz Y, Waqas A. Forecasting Hydrogen Production from Wind Energy in a Suburban Environment Using Machine Learning. Energies. 2022; 15(23):8901. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238901
Chicago/Turabian StyleJavaid, Ali, Umer Javaid, Muhammad Sajid, Muhammad Rashid, Emad Uddin, Yasar Ayaz, and Adeel Waqas. 2022. "Forecasting Hydrogen Production from Wind Energy in a Suburban Environment Using Machine Learning" Energies 15, no. 23: 8901. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238901
APA StyleJavaid, A., Javaid, U., Sajid, M., Rashid, M., Uddin, E., Ayaz, Y., & Waqas, A. (2022). Forecasting Hydrogen Production from Wind Energy in a Suburban Environment Using Machine Learning. Energies, 15(23), 8901. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238901