Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Current State of the Research Problem
2.1. Review of the Literature
2.2. Key Elements of the Energy Policy Strategy of Polish Enterprises
- -
- Maximizing energy efficiency, including zero-emission buildings;
- -
- Maximizing the use of renewable energy sources (RES) and electricity for the full decarbonization of energy supply in Europe;
- -
- Adopting the principles of clean, safe, and connected mobility;
- -
- Competitive EU industry and circular economy as key factors in reducing greenhouse gas emissions;
- -
- Development of appropriate smart grid infrastructure and interconnections;
- -
- Full use of the advantages of the economy and the creation of the necessary carbon sinks;
- -
- Tackling the remaining CO2 emissions with carbon capture and storage (CO2 Capture and Storage, CCS).
- -
- Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 55%;
- -
- Increase the share of RES in final energy consumption to 32%;
- -
- Improve energy efficiency by up to 32.5%.
- -
- Moving away from the use of fossil fuels in the production of electricity and the generation of heat and cold;
- -
- Reduction of CO2 emissions to the level of 80–95% compared to the emissions in the 1990s;
- -
- Achieving the share of RES at the level of 70% in total energy production and 97% in electricity production;
- -
- Continuous improvement of energy efficiency in construction, transport, agriculture and the energy sector;
- -
- Promoting electroprosumerism;
- -
- Full electromobility of transport;
- -
- Use of electricity from RES in all areas of economic activity and life of residents;
- -
- Obtaining security of energy supply based on industrial storage technologies;
- -
- The use of innovative technologies, including the share of “green” hydrogen at the level of 13–14%, by the EU hydrogen strategy.
3. Materials and Methods
- -
- Collecting data from primary sources as part of inspection visits to various production and service enterprises and secondary ones;
- -
- Analysis of statistical data from primary sources (derived from collected empirical data) and secondary sources;
- -
- Logical analysis when creating models and analysis of the results obtained during the research;
- -
- Synthesis enabling the combination of components separated by analysis;
- -
- Mathematical and statistical analysis, enabling qualitative and quantitative presentation of the results of primary and secondary research;
- -
- Inductive and deductive reasoning, used in the interpretation and synthesis of research results and the creation of a model.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. The Way a Knowledge-Based Enterprise Functions
- -
- Increasing innovation in relations with the environment and the efficiency of implementing new solutions;
- -
- Increasing the role of factors facilitating the creation and transfer of knowledge and information in the enterprise;
- -
- Wider use of information technologies supporting the activity of the organization;
- -
- Increasing environmental awareness is understood as the state of knowledge, views, and ideas about the role of the environment in the organization’s activities and about the impact of the organization on the environment.
4.2. The Business Model of Energy Companies
4.3. An Example of a Prosumer Business
- ✓
- Savings generated by the entire 653.89 kWp photovoltaic installation:
- -
- Period of operation from 2020 to 2022;
- -
- Energy produced during operation: 1065.624 MWh;
- -
- Rate for energy from the network: EUR 213/MWh;
- -
- Company savings thanks to the energy produced in this period: EUR 226,622.87.
- ✓
- Rate of return on investment [63]:
5. Conclusions
- Increasingly, knowledge management is used by enterprises as an effective tool to change the way they operate and adapt to changes in the environment in the conditions of the ongoing energy transformation. This inexhaustible resource enables a quick and flexible response to the needs of the dynamically changing market and aids in making the right strategic decisions.
- The use of a photovoltaic installation in the company based on the business model is justified in practice and allows businesses to reduce the electricity costs incurred by the company, in this case by about 60%.
- Thanks to the knowledge management aspects, it is possible to analyze the distribution of energy, with a subdivision into energy consumed and sent to the grid, as well as taking into account the amount of energy produced by the photovoltaic installation, depending on weather conditions.
- Based on the analysis of the measurement results, the annual energy consumption oscillates around 850 MWh, and an installed photovoltaic installation covers over 60% of the total demand. These data give a positive assessment of the functioning of business models and their effective use for various investments in RES.
- The savings generated in a relatively short period from the analyzed prosumer/customer installation prove that this installation allows for significantly reduce electricity costs. Taking into account the result for the calculated payback period of 3 years, it proves that such an investment is very profitable for the company.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Szymańska, W.K.; Walecka, A. Wybrane Aspekty Zarządzania Nowoczesną Organizacją; Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne Oddział w Łodzi: Łodź, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Al Shaar, E.M.; Khattab, S.A.; Alkaied, R.N.; Manna, A.Q. The Effect of Top Management Support on Innovation: The Mediating Role of Synergy Between Organizational Structure and Information Technology. Int. Rev. Manag. Bus. Res. 2015, 4, 499. [Google Scholar]
- Griffin, R. Podstawy Zarządzania Organizacjami; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Klimczok, M.A.; Tomczyk, A. Zarządzanie wiedzą—Współczesna koncepcja zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Zesz. Nauk. Wyższej Szkoły Humanit. Zarządzanie 2012, 2, 165–174. [Google Scholar]
- Bosma, N.; Wennekers, S.; Amoros, J.E. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 Extended Report: Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Employees Across the Globe; Global Entrepreneurship Research Association: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Gierszewska, G. Zarządzanie Wiedzą W Przedsiębiorstwie; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej: Warszawa, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Czarkowski, J.J. E-learning Dla Dorosłych; Diffin: Warszawa, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dalkir, K.; Liebowitz, J. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Klimek, J. Inteligentny Rozwój Firmy Rodzinnej a Współczesne Wartości; Warszawa: Warszawa, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kozioł, M. Wykorzystanie e-learningu w procesie szkolenia pracowników małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej 2013, 22, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Miodek, P.; Speer, Ł. Inżynier globalny—Z perspektywy prawa i zarządzania. Przedsiębiorstwo Przyszłości 2014, 1, 50–51. [Google Scholar]
- Tworek, K.; Walecka-Jankowska, K.; Martan, J. Structure reorganization due to IT information functions support for knowledge management. China-USA Bus. Rev. 2015, 14, 216–227. [Google Scholar]
- Walczak, W. Zarządzanie wiedzą w przedsiębiorstwie. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa 2009, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Juchniewicz, M.; Grzybowska, B. Innowacyjność mikroprzedsiębiorstw w Polsce; PARP: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Nieć, M. Sytuacja mikroprzedsiębiorstw w Polsce w latach 2011–2012. In Raport o Stanie Sektora Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w Latach 2011–2012; Tarnawa, A., Zadura-Lichota, P., Eds.; PARP: Warszawa, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Sułkowski, Ł. Metody Zarządzania Współczesnym Przedsiębiorstwem; SAN: Łodź, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Drucker, P.F. Myśli Przewodnie; Wydawnictwo MT Biznes sp. z o.o.: Warszawa, Poland, 2008; ISBN 978-83-61040-37-8. [Google Scholar]
- Wróblewska, V. Charakterystyka wpływu czynnika strategicznego na zarządzanie wiedzą. In Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XV(111); Gołębiowska, E., Ed.; Wydawnictwo SAN: Łodź, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Jaruzelski, B.; Dehoff, K. The global innovation 1000, Strategy and Business. Tech Innov. 2010, 61, 48. [Google Scholar]
- Kowalczyk, A.; Nogalski, B. Zarządzanie Wiedzą. Koncepcja i Narzędzia; Difin: Warszawa, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, C.; Chuang, S.H.; To, P.L. How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. J. Bus. Res. 2011, 64, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobni, C.B. The relationship between innovation orientation and competitive strategy. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2010, 14, 331–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fidel, P.; Schlesinger, W.; Cervera, A. Collaborating to innovate: Effects on customer knowledge management and performance. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1426–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janczewska, D. Logistyczno-marketingowe uwarunkowania transferu wiedzy w sektorze mikroprzedsiębiorstw. Pr. Kom. Geogr. Przemysłu Pol. Tow. Geogr. 2013, 21, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svejenova, S.; Planellas, M.; Vives, L. An Individual Business Model in the Making: A Chef’s Quest for Creative Freedom. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 408–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafer, S.M.; Smith, H.J.; Linder, J.C. The Power of Business Models. Indiana Univ. Bus. Horiz. 2005, 48, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demil, B.; Lecocq, X. Business Model Evolution: In Search of Dynamic Consistency. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M.W.; Christensen, C.M.; Kagermann, H. Reinventing Your Business Model; Harvard Business Review: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; Volume 86. [Google Scholar]
- Gołębiowski, T.; Dudzik, T.M.; Lewandowska, M.; Witek-Hajduk, M. Modele Biznesu Polskich Przedsiębiorstw; Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Osterwalder, A.; Pigneur, Y. Business Model Generation: A Handbook of Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers; Strategyzer Series; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Brzóska, J. Innowacje Jako Czynnik Dynamizujący Modele Biznesowe; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej: Gliwice, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hamel, G. Leading the Revolution; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Prahalad, C.K.; Krishnan, M.S. New Age of Innovation; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Obłój, K. Tworzywo Skutecznych Startegii; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Matusiak, B. Modele biznesowe na nowym zintegrowanym rynku energii; Uniwersytet Łódzki: Łódź, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Toffler, A. Budowa Nowej Cywilizacji: Polityka Trzeciej Fali; Wyd. Zysk I S-ka: Poznań, Poland, 1996; ISBN 83-7150-102-1. [Google Scholar]
- Kwast, U.; Herman, U. Wiedza jako czynnik konkurencyjności polskich przedsiębiorstw. In Zarządzanie wiedzą. Wybrane Problem; Szuwarzyński, A., Ed.; Zakład Zarządzania Wiedzą i Informacją Naukowo-Techniczną: Gdańsk, Poland, 2004; ISBN 83-88617-02-8. [Google Scholar]
- Kisielnicki, J. Kapitał intelektualny w procesie zarządzania wiedzą: Relacje i czynniki. Probl. Zarządzania 2007, 4, 26–42. [Google Scholar]
- Skrzypek, E. Jakość i Efektywność; Wydawnictwo UMCS: Lublin, Poland, 2002; ISBN 83-227-1626-5. [Google Scholar]
- Trajer, J.; Paszek, A.; Iwan, S. Zarządzanie Wiedzą; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 2012; ISBN 978-83-208-2015-7. [Google Scholar]
- Mikuła, B. Geneza, przesłanki i istota zarządzania wiedzą. In Zarządzanie Wiedzą w Przedsiębiorstwie; Perechuda, K., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2005; ISBN 83-01-14492-0. [Google Scholar]
- Kaczmarek, B.; Sikorski, C. Podstawy Zarządzania; Wyd. Absolwent: Łódź, Poland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kulińska, E.; Kulińska, K. Development of ride-sourcing services and sustainable city logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 39, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilmańska, A. (Ed.) Raport o Stanie Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w Latach 2008–2009; PARP: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gobble, A.M. Innovation and strategy. Res.-Technol. Manag. 2012, 55, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat Statistics Explained, Electricity Price Statistics. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Electricity_price_statistics (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- Solar Power Europe—Leading the Energy Transition. 2023. Available online: https://www.solarpowereurope.org/events2/solarpower-summit-2 (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- IEO Instytut Energetyki Odnawialnej. Główny Raport Solar. Rynek Fotowoltaiki w Polsce. 2019. Available online: https://ieo.pl/pl/projekty/raport-rynek-fotowoltaiki-w-polsce-2019 (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- IEA. World Energy Outlook 2019—Analysis—IEA; Part of World Energy Outlook IEA: Paris, France, 2019; ISBN 978-92-64-97300-8. [Google Scholar]
- Bukowski, M.; Śniegocki, A. Forum Energii. Polska Energetyka 2050—4 Scenariusze. 2017. Available online: https://forum-energii.eu/pl/analizy/polska-energetyka-2050-4-scenariusze (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- Green, M.A.; Dunlop, E.D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Yoshita, M.; Kopidakis, N.; Hao, X. Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 56). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2020, 28, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Modanese, C.; Laine, H.; Pasanen, T.; Savin, H.; Pearce, J. Economic Advantages of Dry-Etched Black Silicon in Passivated Emitter Rear Cell (PERC) Photovoltaic Manufacturing. Energies 2018, 11, 2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachiewicz, S.; Nogalski, B. Osiągnięcia i Perspektywy Rozwoju Nauk o Zarządzaniu; Wolters Kluwer Business: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kulińska, E. Model of Axiological Dimension Risk Management. Found. Manag. 2016, 8, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tworek, K. Wpływ Technologii Informacyjnych na Struktury Organizacyjne Przedsiębiorstw; Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej: Wroclaw, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Miroński, J. Wyzwania zarzadzania wiedzą w zespołach wirtualnych. E-mentor 2014, 5, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrzyk, S. Innowacyjne podejście do zarządzania wiedzą na przykładzie szkolenia osób 50+. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie 2015, 16, 9–21. [Google Scholar]
- Stefaniuk, T. Komunikacja w Zespole Wirtualnym; Diffin: Warszawa, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kancelaria Sejmu, R.P. Dz.U. 2022 poz. 2370 Ustawa z dnia 29 Września 2022 r. o Zmianie Ustawy—Prawo Energetyczne Oraz Ustawy o Odnawialnych Źródłach Energii; Sejm RP: Warszawa, Poland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Niekurzak, M. The Potential of Using Renewable Energy Sources in Poland Taking into Account the Economic and Ecological Conditions. Energies 2021, 14, 7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayibo, K.S.; Pearce, J.M. A review of the value of solar methodology with a case study of the US VOS. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamatellos, G.; Zogou, O.; Stamatelos, A. Energy Performance Optimization of a House with Grid-Connected Rooftop PV Installation and Air Source Heat Pump. Energies 2021, 14, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulik, J.; Niekurzak, M. Impact of a Photovoltaic Installation on Economic Efficiency on the Example of a Company with High Energy Consumption. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej 2023, 521–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energy Sector | Construction Sector | Agricultural Sector | Industry Sector | Transport Sector |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Itemization | A Traditional Enterprise | Knowledge-Based Enterprise |
---|---|---|
Objective | making a profit | creating global value through the highest quality standards |
Focus attention | on the mass production of material goods | on the design and application of modern technology based on the highest environmental standards |
Strategy | passive or reactive, i.e., the organization does not react to changes in the environment or reacts with delay | proactive, i.e., anticipating changes in the environment and preparing the organization and mechanisms of action for them in advance, to use them as an opportunity in the era of energy transformation |
Dominant resource | tangible and financial capital | knowledge supported by global solutions and standards, intellectual capital |
Market value | determined mainly by possessed material resources | determined mainly by intangible resources and environmental certificates |
The dominant direction of investment | investing in material resources | investing in the development of new RES technologies and the use of knowledge and intellectual capital |
An approach to uncertainty | treating unusual events as threats | treating unusual, innovative events as a source of inspiration and opportunities |
Ways of operation | structured and stable, adhering to stereotypes, and rejecting contradictory information | each time adapted to the situation, e.g., legal requirements, certification, etc., rejection of stereotypes |
Basic knowledge | highly specialized | interdisciplinary |
Approach to change | emphasizing the stabilizing role of the organization, treating changes as a threat, forced changes are introduced periodically at a specific pace and in an easy-to-assimilate way | change orientation: sudden, fast, and often radical changes; the continuous improvement process |
Organizational structure | traditional, focused on the functions of the enterprise with the dominance of hierarchical dependencies, strong emphasis on control | network of cooperative units that are self-managed and focused on processes and informal mechanisms of exerting pressure (communication, participation, culture) |
Cooperation with suppliers, cooperators, and clients | lack of close cooperative ties, price competition between suppliers and cooperators, limited contacts with the customer, and frequent lack of response to customer preferences | close partnership based on trust and quality traceability throughout the supply chain, e.g., energy transmission |
Marketing | focus on transactions—the principles of mass marketing prevail, e.g., focus on product prices, selling one product to many customers | focus on relationships—relationship management rules prevail, e.g., regarding energy and fuel prices |
Production | based on economies of scale, long production lines, infrequent production shifts, narrow production range, and use of specialized machines | based on scope economy, short production lines, frequent product and production improvements, wide range, flexible machines with easy assembly, and low cost |
Scope of Performed Tasks | The Scope of Knowledge Needed |
---|---|
In the area of the distribution system operator | |
|
|
In the area of electricity generation | |
|
|
In the area of electricity trading | |
|
|
In the area of customer service | |
|
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Niekurzak, M.; Mikulik, J. Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation. Energies 2023, 16, 4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114281
Niekurzak M, Mikulik J. Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation. Energies. 2023; 16(11):4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114281
Chicago/Turabian StyleNiekurzak, Mariusz, and Jerzy Mikulik. 2023. "Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation" Energies 16, no. 11: 4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114281
APA StyleNiekurzak, M., & Mikulik, J. (2023). Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation. Energies, 16(11), 4281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114281