A Future with Machine Learning: Review of Condition Assessment of Structures and Mechanical Systems in Nuclear Facilities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Past Condition Assessment Studies
2.1. Structural Systems
2.2. Mechanical Systems
- Most of the past studies are related to non-nuclear applications and the proposed frameworks are typically focused on detecting major damage such as cracks, notches, or fissures in the system. A condition assessment framework for nuclear structural and mechanical systems should be able to detect minor degradation as well as the onset of degradation, such as fatigue accumulation in piping systems and chemical reactions in concrete structures;
- Furthermore, the previous studies either employ large datasets collected directly from the sensors or define specific damage-sensitive indices to train the machine learning algorithms. In nuclear applications, the amount of time to take action against an anomaly in the system is very important and any erroneous or late decisions can result in nuclear accidents. Using large datasets, without any data preprocessing and feature extraction, can necessitate the installation of expensive computational resources;
- It is also shown that using damage indices defined by previous studies for non-nuclear applications can result in poor prediction accuracies because of the differences in the acquired dynamic response [56].
3. Current Initiatives in the Nuclear Industry
3.1. Recent Efforts towards Automation in the Nuclear Industry
3.2. Condition Assessment of Piping-Equipment Systems
3.3. Condition Assessment in Concrete Structures
4. Challenges in Using AI Algorithms
5. Recommendations for Future Research
- 1
- The initial success of AI-based condition assessment frameworks needs to be validated against laboratory experiments or real-time data from nuclear power plants. Sensor data should be collected from mechanical systems such as piping attached to equipment, as well as structural concrete systems being tested for chemical reactions and cracks. Compared to simulated sensor data, experimental/on-site sensor data are expected to include some variations that can affect the performance of AI algorithms. Real-time data can be noisy due to surrounding vibrations, environmental effects, or sensor malfunctions. Typically, structures and systems undergo non-uniform degradation. However, high-fidelity modeling of non-uniform degradation in finite element software is challenging. Uncertainty in various parameters, such as degradation severity and a number of simultaneously degraded locations, can also impact the quality of signals acquired from as-built systems;
- 2
- The effects of data scarcity on the predictive capabilities of a machine-learning framework need to be studied. Techniques such as data augmentation and damage-sensitive feature extraction can be explored as possible solutions;
- 3
- Data handling, from its acquisition, storage, and processing, is one of the biggest challenges in autonomous industrial applications. Continuous streams of acquired data from nuclear power plants have to be appropriately stored and handled. The use of cloud-based storage services, data mining technology, and effective data preprocessing needs to be demonstrated;
- 4
- The overall objective of using automation in the nuclear energy sector is to reduce construction, operations, and maintenance costs. However, AI implementation in itself can incur high computational costs. The total energy usage of various AI algorithms and their computational costs for installation and employment need to be calculated. A comparison study would enable the nuclear industry to make informed decisions on the performance of AI-based frameworks versus the incurred expenditure;
- 5
- For public and government safety, it is essential to conduct research on cyber-safe automation platforms. Designs that demonstrate resiliency against malware and unauthorized access data by hackers need to be developed;
- 6
- Since the performance of condition assessment frameworks at a nuclear facility is vital to its safety, an interpretable machine learning algorithm can enhance the reliability of such condition assessment frameworks. Some simpler machine learning algorithms such as linear regression, decision trees, random forest, etc., are favorable for interpretability when compared to deep learning such as neural networks. However, the accuracy of complex algorithms such as ANNs, CNNs, and RNNs can outperform other interpretable models. The balance between the explainability and accuracy of various AI algorithms should be examined for future applications in the nuclear industry, including the use of physics-guided machine learning;
- 7
- The use of computer vision for new nuclear construction needs to be investigated during the construction phase to create “as-built” digital twins which would enable significant advances in condition assessment. It can also enhance worker safety, asset management, and reduce maintenance costs.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
ASR | Alkali–Silica Reaction |
CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
CPS | Cyber-Physical Systems |
CWT | Continuous Wavelet Transform |
DBN | Dynamic Bayesian Networks |
DL | Deep Learning |
DT | Digital Twin |
FEM | Finite Element Model |
FFT | Fast-Fourier Transform |
FRF | Frequency Response Functions |
XAI | Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
GA | Genetic Algorithms |
GE | General Electric |
GEMINA | Generating Electricity Managed by Intelligent Nuclear Assets |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
GPU | Graphical Processing Units |
HHT | Hilbert–Huang Transform |
HPC | High-Performance Computing |
IAEA | International Atomic Energy Agency |
IoT | Internet of Things |
kNN | k-Nearest Neighbor |
LOCA | Loss of Coolant Action |
LSTM | Long-Short-Term-Memory |
MAGNET | Microreactor Agile Non-Nuclear Experimental Testbed |
MARS | Maintenance of Advanced Reactor Sensors and Components |
MDPI | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
MEITNER | Modeling-Enhanced Innovations Trailblazing Nuclear Energy Reinvigoration |
ML | Machine Learning |
NAMAC | Development of a Nearly Autonomous Management and Control System |
NASA | National Aeronautics and Space Administration |
NDT | Non-Destructive Testing |
NEUP | Nuclear Energy University Program |
NN | Neural Networks |
O&M | Operation and Maintenance |
PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
PINN | Physics-Informed Neural NetworkS |
PRA | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
PSD | Power Spectral Density |
RMSE | Root Mean Square Error |
RNN | Recurrent Neural Network |
SHM | Structural Health Monitoring |
SSCs | Structures, Systems, and Components |
STFT | Short-Time Fourier Transform |
SVM | Support Vector Machines |
TPU | Tensor Processing Units |
TSDM | Time Series Data Mining |
US-DOE | United States Department of Energy |
US-NRC | United States-Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
WT | Wavelet Transform |
2D | Two-Dimensional |
References
- Gohel, H.A.; Upadhyay, H.; Lagos, L.; Cooper, K.; Sanzetenea, A. Predictive maintenance architecture development for nuclear infrastructure using machine learning. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 1436–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, P.R.; Jacob, J. Asset Management In addition, Finite Element Analysis In Smart grid. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA), Arad, Romania, 17–19 December 2021; pp. 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Nie, G.Y.; Han, K. Real-Time and Automatic Detection of Welding Joints Using Deep Learning. In Construction Research Congress 2022; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA; pp. 601–609. [CrossRef]
- Vlasov, A.; Barbarino, M. Seven Ways AI Will Change Nuclear Science and Technology. International Atomic Energy Agency. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/seven-ways-ai-will-change-nuclear-science-and-technology (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NAMAC. Development of a Nearly Autonomous Management and Control (NAMAC) System for Advanced Reactors. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/projects/management-and-control-system-advanced-reactors (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Upadhyaya, B.R.; Zhao, K.; Perillo, S.R.; Xu, X.; Na, M.G. Autonomous Control of Space Reactor Systems; University of Tennessee: Knoxville, TN, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wood, R.T. Autonomous Control for Generation IV Nuclear Plants. In Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–25 March 2004; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Basher, H. Autonomous Control of Nuclear Power Plants; Technical Report ORNL/TM-2003/252, 885601; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Varuttamaseni, A.; Yoo, S.; Borrelli, A. Adaptive Control and Monitoring Platform for Autonomous Operation of Advanced Nuclear Reactors. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202020%20Abstracts/CFA-20-19280_TechnicalAbstract_2020CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-20-19280.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Lin, L.; Athe, P.; Rouxelin, P.; Avramova, M.; Gupta, A.; Youngblood, R.; Lane, J.; Dinh, N. Digital-twin-based improvements to diagnosis, prognosis, strategy assessment, and discrepancy checking in a nearly autonomous management and control system. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2022, 166, 108715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Athe, P.; Rouxelin, P.; Avramova, M.; Gupta, A.; Youngblood, R.; Lane, J.; Dinh, N. Development and assessment of a nearly autonomous management and control system for advanced reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2021, 150, 107861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sure Controls Inc. What Is Industrial Automation? Sure Controls Inc.: Greenville, WI, USA, 2013; Available online: https://www.surecontrols.com/what-is-industrial-automation/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- ARPA-E. Modeling-Enhanced Innovations Trailblazing Nuclear Energy Reinvigoration. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/meitner (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- ARPA-E. Generating Electricity Managed by Intelligent Nuclear Assets. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/programs/gemina (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- CORYS. Digital Reactor Project: The Practical Stage. CORYS Dynamic Solutions. Available online: https://www.corys.com/en/digital-reactor-project-the-practical-stage/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Systems, G. GSE Solutions Wins Contract to Implement Digital Twin Simulator for Nuclear Plant in Korea. Available online: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gse-solutions-wins-contract-to-implement-digital-twin-simulator-for-nuclear-plant-in-korea-301640254.html (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Chang-Won, L. SK Telecom Partners with KHNP to Develop Smart Solutions for Nuclear Power Plants. Aju Business Daily. Available online: https://www.ajudaily.com/view/20190614140321671 (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Grieves, M. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication. White Pap. 2014, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaessgen, E.; Stargel, D. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2012; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tuegel, E.J.; Ingraffea, A.R.; Eason, T.G.; Spottswood, S.M. Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2011, 2011, 154798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seshadri, B.R.; Krishnamurthy, T. Structural health management of damaged aircraft structures using digital twin concept. In Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Grapevine, TX, USA, 9–13 January 2017; p. 1675. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.; Mahadevan, S.; Ling, Y.; Choze, S.; Wang, L. Dynamic Bayesian Network for Aircraft Wing Health Monitoring Digital Twin. AIAA J. 2017, 55, 930–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajesh, P.; Manikandan, N.; Ramshankar, C.; Vishwanathan, T.; Sathishkumar, C. Digital Twin of an Automotive Brake Pad for Predictive Maintenance. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 165, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rassolkin, A.; Vaimann, T.; Kallaste, A.; Kuts, V. Digital twin for propulsion drive of autonomous electric vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 60th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON), Riga, Latvia, 7–9 October 2019; IEEE: Riga, Latvia, 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, G.N.; Steinmetz, C.; Pereira, C.E.; Espindola, D.B. Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haag, S.; Anderl, R. Digital twin—Proof of concept. Manuf. Lett. 2018, 15, 64–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Starly, B.; Cohen, P.; Lee, Y.S. Sensor Data and Information Fusion to Construct Digital-twins Virtual Machine Tools for Cyber-physical Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 10, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruynseels, K.; Santoni de Sio, F.; van den Hoven, J. Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grosse, C.U. Monitoring and Inspection Techniques Supporting a Digital Twin Concept in Civil Engineering. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (SCMT5): In honour of Professor Christian Grosse, Kingston University, London, UK, 15–17 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Dang, N.; Kang, H.; Lon, S.; Shim, C. 3D Digital Twin Models for Bridge Maintenance. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 31 July–3 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bazilevs, Y.; Deng, X.; Korobenko, A.; Lanza di Scalea, F.; Todd, M.D.; Taylor, S.G. Isogeometric Fatigue Damage Prediction in Large-Scale Composite Structures Driven by Dynamic Sensor Data. J. Appl. Mech. 2015, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, A.M.; Mochel, K.; Lin, J.W. Digital Twin Interface for Operating Wind Farms. U.S. Patent 9,995,278, 12 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lund, A.M.; Mochel, K.; Lin, J.W. Digital Wind Farm System. U.S. Patent 2016/0333855, 17 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, C. Monitoring and Warning for Digital Twin-driven Mountain Geological Disaster. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Tianjin, China, 4–7 August 2019; IEEE: Tianjin, China, 2019; pp. 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kochunas, B.; Huan, X. Digital Twin Concepts with Uncertainty for Nuclear Power Applications. Energies 2021, 14, 4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Gurgen, A.; Dinh, N. Development and assessment of prognosis digital twin in a NAMAC system. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2022, 179, 109439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Lin, L.; Dinh, N. Data coverage assessment on neural network based digital twins for autonomous control system. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2022, 182, 109568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borowski, P.F. Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prantikos, K.; Tsoukalas, L.H.; Heifetz, A. Physics-Informed Neural Network Solution of Point Kinetics Equations for a Nuclear Reactor Digital Twin. Energies 2022, 15, 7697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malerba, L.; Al Mazouzi, A.; Bertolus, M.; Cologna, M.; Efsing, P.; Jianu, A.; Kinnunen, P.; Nilsson, K.F.; Rabung, M.; Tarantino, M. Materials for Sustainable Nuclear Energy: A European Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for All Reactor Generations. Energies 2022, 15, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crowder, N.; Lee, J.; Gupta, A.; Han, K.; Bodda, S.; Ritter, C. Digital Engineering for Integrated Modeling and Simulation for Building-Piping Systems Through Interoperability Solutions. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2022, 196, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patterson, E.A.; Taylor, R.J.; Bankhead, M. A framework for an integrated nuclear digital environment. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2016, 87, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patterson, E.A.; Purdie, S.; Taylor, R.J.; Waldon, C. An integrated digital framework for the design, build and operation of fusion power plants. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- International-Atomic-Energy-Agency. Safety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants; Technical Report Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-30; International Atomic Energy: Agency, Vienna, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A.; Sewell, R.T. Application of risk-informed validation framework to a flooding scenario. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng. 2021, 7, 04021044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Chen, J.; Zou, C.; Li, X. Accident Modeling and Analysis of Nuclear Reactors. Energies 2022, 15, 5790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodda, S. Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of a Flood Defense Structure. Master’s Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Probabilistic Safety Assessment on Water Intake Blockage of Nuclear Power Plant, Volume 13: Risk Assessments and Management, International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. 2022. Available online: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ICONE/proceedings-pdf/ICONE29/86489/V013T13A054/6949744/v013t13a054-icone29-93528.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A.; Dinh, N. Risk informed validation framework for external flooding scenario. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2020, 356, 110377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonello, F.; Buongiorno, J.; Zio, E. A methodology to perform dynamic risk assessment using system theory and modeling and simulation: Application to nuclear batteries. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 228, 108769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A.; Dinh, N. Enhancement of risk informed validation framework for external hazard scenario. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2020, 204, 107140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandhu, H.K.; Patel, P.; Gupta, A.; Mihara, Y. External Multi-Hazard Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methodology and Applications: A review of the State-of-the-Art. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, IASMiRT, Charlotte, NC, USA, 4–9 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Vaishanav, P.; Gupta, A.; Bodda, S.S. Limitations of traditional tools for beyond design basis external hazard PRA. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2020, 370, 110899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuclear-Energy-Agency. Safety of Components and Structures. Available online: https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_24135/safety-of-components-and-structures (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A. Post-hazard condition assessment of nuclear piping-equipment systems: Novel approach to feature extraction and deep learning. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2022, 201, 104849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chae, Y.H.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.T.; Seong, P.H. A methodology for diagnosing FAC induced pipe thinning using accelerometers and deep learning models. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2020, 143, 107501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gribok, A.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q. Machine-Learning Enabled Evaluation of Probability of Piping Degradation In Secondary Systems of Nuclear Power Plants; Technical Report INL/CON–20-57022-Rev.000, 1634815; Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho Falls, ID, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Sauers, S.; Gupta, A. Condition Monitoring of Nuclear Equipment-Piping Using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, IASMiRT, Berlin, Germany, 20–24 September 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.; Yusa, N.; Hashizume, H. Low Frequency Electromagnetic Testing for Evaluating Wall Thinning in Carbon Steel Pipe. Mater. Trans. 2018, 59, 1348–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A. Structural Health Monitoring of Piping-Equipment Systems in Nuclear Power Plants using Artificial Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Porto, Portugal, 30 June–2 July 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Aliyeva, G.G.; Pape, Y.L.; Gupta, A.; Samaddar, S. Modeling Concete Expansion due to Alkali-Silica Reaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, IASMiRT, Berlin/Potsdam, Germany, 10–15 July 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, P.A. Simulating Damage and Degradation in Concrete Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Dinh, T.H.; Ha, Q.P.; La, H.M. Computer vision-based method for concrete crack detection. In Proceedings of the 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Phuket, Thailand, 13–15 November 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using U-net fully convolutional networks. Autom. Constr. 2019, 104, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, L.; Soltangharaei, V.; Ziehl, P. Evaluation of ASR in concrete using acoustic emission and deep learning. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2021, 380, 111328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Li, Z.; Ma, B. Neural network analysis of chloride diffusion in concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2002, 14, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Sun, C. Structural damage identification via physics-guided machine learning: A methodology integrating pattern recognition with finite element model updating. Struct. Health Monit. 2021, 20, 1675–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seventekidis, P.; Giagopoulos, D.; Arailopoulos, A.; Markogiannaki, O. Structural Health Monitoring using deep learning with optimal finite element model generated data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 145, 106972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mi, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, L. Detecting structural damage under unknown seismic excitation by deep convolutional neural network with wavelet-based transmissibility data. Struct. Health Monit. 2021, 20, 1583–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Entezami, A.; Shariatmadar, H.; Mariani, S. Fast unsupervised learning methods for structural health monitoring with large vibration data from dense sensor networks. Struct. Health Monit. 2020, 19, 1685–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.T.; Seong, S.H.; Cheon, S.W.; Lee, C.K.; Lee, N.Y.; Hwang, I.S.; Lee, S.J.; Luk, V.K. Integrated Approach for On-line Condition Monitoring on Process Components and Piping. In Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, 25–26 May 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, R.M.; Bond, L.J.; Ramuhalli, P. Online Condition Monitoring to Enable Extended Operation of Nuclear Power Plants. Prog. Nucl. Saf. Symbiosis Sustain. 2014, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, N.Y.; Lee, S.G.; Ryu, K.H.; Hwang, I.S. On-line monitoring system development for single-phase flow accelerated corrosion. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2007, 237, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyedpoor, S.M.; Ahmadi, A.; Pahnabi, N. Structural damage detection using time domain responses and an optimization method. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 2019, 27, 669–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, D.; Taheri, F. Health monitoring of pipeline girth weld using empirical mode decomposition. Smart Mater. Struct. 2010, 19, 055016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, W.; Qiao, P. Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study. Struct. Health Monit. 2011, 10, 83–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandara, R.P.; Chan, T.H.; Thambiratnam, D.P. Frequency response function based damage identification using principal component analysis and pattern recognition technique. Eng. Struct. 2014, 66, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, P.S.; Ramakrishna, V.; Mahendra, N.V.D. Experimental and Analytical Modal Analysis of Cantilever Beam for Vibration Based Damage Identification Using Artificial Neural Network. J. Test. Eval. 2018, 46, 20160112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, S. Structural Damage Detection in the Frequency Domain using Neural Networks. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2007, 18, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran-Ngoc, H.; Khatir, S.; De Roeck, G.; Bui-Tien, T.; Abdel Wahab, M. An efficient artificial neural network for damage detection in bridges and beam-like structures by improving training parameters using cuckoo search algorithm. Eng. Struct. 2019, 199, 109637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cofre-Martel, S.; Kobrich, P.; Lopez Droguett, E.; Meruane, V. Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Structural Damage Localization and Quantification Using Transmissibility Data. Shock Vib. 2019, 2019, 9859281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazali, M.; Staszewski, W.; Shucksmith, J.; Boxall, J.; Beck, S. Instantaneous phase and frequency for the detection of leaks and features in a pipeline system. Struct. Health Monit. 2011, 10, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdeljaber, O.; Avci, O.; Kiranyaz, S.; Gabbouj, M.; Inman, D.J. Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J. Sound Vib. 2017, 388, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nannan, L.; Kanyandekwe, J.B. The detection of structural damage using Convolutional Neural Networks on vibration signal. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 16–18 October 2019; IEEE: Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2019; pp. 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lecun, Y.; Bottou, L.; Bengio, Y.; Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 1998, 86, 2278–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bao, Y.; Tang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y. Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 2019, 18, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puruncajas, B.; Vidal, Y.; Tutivén, C. Vibration-Response-Only Structural Health Monitoring for Offshore Wind Turbine Jacket Foundations via Convolutional Neural Networks. Sensors 2020, 20, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miorelli, R.; Fisher, C.; Kulakovskyi, A.; Chapuis, B.; Mesnil, O.; D’Almeida, O. Defect sizing in guided wave imaging structural health monitoring using convolutional neural networks. NDT E Int. 2021, 122, 102480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, M.A. A New Structural Health Monitoring Strategy Based on PZT Sensors and Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors 2018, 18, 2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mariani, S.; Rendu, Q.; Urbani, M.; Sbarufatti, C. Causal dilated convolutional neural networks for automatic inspection of ultrasonic signals in non-destructive evaluation and structural health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 157, 107748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zha, B.; Bai, Y.; Yilmaz, A.; Sezen, H. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Comprehensive Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection. In Proceedings of the Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA, 10–12 September 2019; DEStech Publications, Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, G.; Li, J.; Hao, H. Vibration signal denoising for structural health monitoring by residual convolutional neural networks. Measurement 2020, 157, 107651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorafshan, S.; Thomas, R.J.; Maguire, M. SDNET2018: An annotated image dataset for non-contact concrete crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Data Brief 2018, 21, 1664–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makki Alamdari, M.; Samali, B.; Li, J.; Kalhori, H.; Mustapha, S. Spectral-Based Damage Identification in Structures under Ambient Vibration. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2016, 30, 04015062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamdari, M.M.; Rakotoarivelo, T.; Khoa, N.L.D. A spectral-based clustering for structural health monitoring of the Sydney Harbour Bridge. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2017, 87, 384–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erazo, K.; Sen, D.; Nagarajaiah, S.; Sun, L. Vibration-based structural health monitoring under changing environmental conditions using Kalman filtering. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 117, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A. Deep Learning Framework for Post-Hazard Condition Monitoring of Nuclear Safety Systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, IWSHM, Stanford, CA, USA, 15–17 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, H.; Azimi, M.; Yan, F.; Lin, Z.; Asce, M.; Student, P.D. Time-Frequency-Based Data-Driven Structural Diagnosis and Damage Detection for Cable-Stayed Bridges. J. Bridge Eng. 2018, 23, 04018033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beheshti Aval, S.B.; Ahmadian, V.; Maldar, M.; Darvishan, E. Damage detection of structures using signal processing and artificial neural networks. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2020, 23, 884–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, A.A.; Zhang, C.; Masri, S.F.; Gholipour, G. Structural Damage Localization and Quantification Based on a CEEMDAN Hilbert Transform Neural Network Approach: A Model Steel Truss Bridge Case Study. Sensors 2020, 20, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sandhu, H.K. Artificial Intelligence Based Condition Monitoring of Nuclear Piping-Equipment Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Stetco, A.; Dinmohammadi, F.; Zhao, X.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Barnes, M.; Keane, J.; Nenadic, G. Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 620–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGugan, M.; Pereira, G.; Sørensen, B.F.; Toftegaard, H.; Branner, K. Damage tolerance and structural monitoring for wind turbine blades. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015, 373, 20140077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Civera, M.; Surace, C. Non-Destructive Techniques for the Condition and Structural Health Monitoring of Wind Turbines: A Literature Review of the Last 20 Years. Sensors 2022, 22, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshuva, A.; Aslesh, A.K.; Sugumaran, V. State of the art of structural health monitoring of wind turbines. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2019, 9, 95–112. [Google Scholar]
- Moll, J.; Arnold, P.; Mälzer, M.; Krozer, V.; Pozdniakov, D.; Salman, R.; Rediske, S.; Scholz, M.; Friedmann, H.; Nuber, A. Radar-based structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades: The case of damage detection. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 17, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solimine, J.; Niezrecki, C.; Inalpolat, M. An experimental investigation into passive acoustic damage detection for structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. Struct. Health Monit. 2020, 19, 1711–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, R.; Weinert, J.; Watson, S. Neural networks for wind turbine fault detection via current signature analysis. In Proceedings of the WindEurope Summit, Hamburg Messe, Hamburg, Germany, 4–9 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Laouti, N.; Sheibat-Othman, N.; Othman, S. Support Vector Machines for Fault Detection in Wind Turbines. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2011, 44, 7067–7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santos, P.; Villa, L.F.; Reñones, A.; Bustillo, A.; Maudes, J. An SVM-based solution for fault detection in wind turbines. Sensors 2015, 15, 5627–5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jiang, G.; He, H.; Yan, J.; Xie, P. Multiscale convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2018, 66, 3196–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshuva, A.; Sugumaran, V. A data driven approach for condition monitoring of wind turbine blade using vibration signals through best-first tree algorithm and functional trees algorithm: A comparative study. ISA Trans. 2017, 67, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broer, A.A.R.; Benedictus, R.; Zarouchas, D. The Need for Multi-Sensor Data Fusion in Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Aircraft Structures. Aerospace 2022, 9, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, S.C. Indirect aircraft structural monitoring using artificial neural networks. Aeronaut. J. 2008, 112, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Sante, R. Fibre Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Aircraft Composite Structures: Recent Advances and Applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 18666–18713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dworakowski, Z.; Dragan, K.; Stepinski, T. Artificial neural network ensembles for fatigue damage detection in aircraft. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dourado, A.; Viana, F.A. Physics-informed neural networks for missing physics estimation in cumulative damage models: A case study in corrosion fatigue. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 20, 061007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Ye, J.; Yang, B. Cyberattack detection for electric vehicles using physics-guided machine learning. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2020, 7, 2010–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noghabaei, M.; Liu, Y.; Han, K. Automated compatibility checking of prefabricated components using 3D as-built models and BIM. Autom. Constr. 2022, 143, 104566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idaho-National-Laboratory. Idaho National Laboratory Demonstrates First Digital Twin of a Simulated Microreactor. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/idaho-national-laboratory-demonstrates-first-digital-twin-simulated-microreactor (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Trellue, H.R.; O’Brien, J.; Reid, R.S.; Guillen, D.; Sabharwall, P. Microreactor Agile Nonnuclear Experimental Testbed Test Plan; Technical Report; Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL): Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Lin, L.; Athe, P.; Dinh, N.; Lane, J.; Youngblood, R. Development of a Nearly Autonomous Management and Control System (NAMAC) for Advanced and Micro Reactors. In SAIMIN: Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and other Innovative Technologies in Nuclear Industry; Canadian Nuclear Society: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Gurgen, A. Development and Assessment of Physics-Guided Machine Learning Framework for Prognosis System; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gurgen, A.; Dinh, N.T. Development and assessment of a reactor system prognosis model with physics-guided machine learning. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2022, 398, 111976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Lin, L.; Athe, P.; Dinh, N. Development of the Machine Learning-based Safety Significant Factor Inference Model for Diagnosis in Autonomous Control System. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2021, 162, 108443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ARPA-E. Maintenance of Advanced Reactor Sensors and Components. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/projects/maintenance-advanced-reactor-sensors-and-components-mars (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- ARPA-E. AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance Digital Twins for Advanced Nuclear Reactors. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/projects/ai-enabled-predictive-maintenance-digital-twins-advanced-nuclear-reactors (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- ARPA-E. High-Fidelity Digital Twins for BWRX-300 Critical Systems. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/projects/high-fidelity-digital-twins-bwrx-300-critical-systems (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- ARPA-E. SAFARI: Secure Automation For Advanced Reactor Innovation. In Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/technologies/projects/safari-secure-automation-advanced-reactor-innovation (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Advanced Online Monitoring and Diagnostic Technologies for Nuclear Plant Management, Operation, and Maintenance. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202019%20Abstracts/2019%20CFA%20Technical%20Abstract%2017478.pdf#search=reliability (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. GuArDIAN: General Active Sensing for conDItion AssessmeNt. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202019%20Abstracts/CFA-19-16391_TechnicalAbstract_2019CFATechnicalAbstract19-16391.pdf#search=condition%20assessment (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Demonstrating Autonomous Control, Remote Operation, and Human Factors for Microreactors Under Prototypic Conditions in PUR-1. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/FY22%20Abstracts/CFA-22-26910_TechnicalAbstract_2022CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-22-26910.pdf#search=deep%20learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Physics-Guided Smart Scaling Methodology for Accelerated Fuel Testing. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/FY22%20Abstracts/CFA-22-26929_TechnicalAbstract_2022CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-22-26929.pdf#search=machine%20learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Physics-Informed Machine Learning to Accelerate Process Modeling in Additive Manufacturing of Structural Materials for Nuclear Application. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/FY22%20Abstracts/DECP-28434_TechnicalAbstract_2022TechnicalAbstractDECP-28434_edited.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Engineering-Informed, Data-Driven Degradation Modeling, Prognostics and Control for Radiation-induced Void Swelling in Reactor Steels. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202020%20Abstracts/CFA-20-19066_TechnicalAbstract_2020CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-20-19066.pdf#search=machine%20learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Computer Vision and Machine Learning for Microstructural Qualification. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202021%20Abstracts/CFA-21-24394_TechnicalAbstract_2021CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-21-24394.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Identifying Needed Fire Input Data to Reduce Modeling Uncertainty. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/SiteAssets/FY%202020%20Abstracts/CFA-20-19671_TechnicalAbstract_2020CFATechnicalAbstractCFA-20-19671.pdf#search=machine%20learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- NEUP-USDOE. Robot-assisted Online Monitoring, Online Maintenance, and Dynamic Risk Assessment for LWRs and Advanced Reactors. Available online: https://neup.inl.gov/FY22%20Abstracts/DECP-28405_TechnicalAbstract_2022TechnicalAbstractDECP-28405.pdf#search=condition%20assessment (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Mala, M.; Miklos, M. Nondestructive testing of nuclear reactor components integrity. International Atomic Energy Agency, Czech Republic. 2011. Available online: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/43/056/43056314.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Sanderson, R.; Sanderson, A.; Akowua, K.; Livesey, H. Development of digital tools to enable remote ultrasonic inspection of fusion reactor in-vessel components. Insight-Non Test. Cond. Monit. 2022, 64, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz de Zuniga, M.; Prinja, N.; Casanova, C.; Dans Alvarez de Sotomayor, A.; Febvre, M.; Camacho Lopez, A.M.; Rodríguez Prieto, A. Artificial Intelligence for the Output Processing of Phased-Array Ultrasonic Test Applied to Materials Defects Detection in the ITER Vacuum Vessel Welding Operations. In Proceedings of the Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 17–22 July 2022; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 86199, p. V005T09A006. [Google Scholar]
- Daura, L.U. Investigation of Wireless Power Transfer-Based Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation. Ph.D. Thesis, Newcastle University, Tyne, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Kim, T.; Park, S.J.; Kim, H.; Jung, I.D. Advanced Thermal Fluid Leakage Detection System with Machine Learning Algorithm for Pipe-in-Pipe Structure. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 42, 102747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zetec. Nondestructive Testing’s Biggest Advantages and Disadvantages. Available online: https://www.zetec.com/blog/nondestructive-testings-biggest-advantages-and-disadvantages/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Wu, P.C. Erosion/Corrosion-Induced Pipe Wall Thinning in U.S. Nuclear Power Plants; Technical Report NUREG–1344, 6152848; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jacimovic, N.; D’Agaro, F. On Piping Vibration Screening Criteria. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 2019, 142, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Section II Materials Part D. 2019. Available online: https://nexnor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ASME-II-PART-D-METRIC-2019.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Park, J.H.; Jo, H.S.; Na, M.G. Residual Stress Evaluation for Dissimilar Metals Welding Using Deep Fuzzy Neural Networks with Rule-Dropout. In Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 19–20 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Naus, D. Primer on Durability of Nuclear Power Plant Reinforced Concrete Structures—A Review of Pertinent Factors; Technical Report NUREG-CR-6927; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Akyirefi Dadzie, E.; Seong, Y.; Yi, S.; Hamoush, S.; Plummer, J. Integrating Predictions for Improving Defect Classification Accuracy in NDT-Based Assessment of Concrete-20229; WM Symposia, Inc.: Tempe, AZ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Juncai, X.; Qingwen, R.; Zhenzhong, S. Prediction of the strength of concrete radiation shielding based on LS-SVM. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2015, 85, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terrapower. Natrium™ Reactor and Integrated Energy Storage. Available online: https://www.terrapower.com/our-work/natriumpower/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Holtecinternational. Small Modular Reactor. Available online: https://holtecinternational.com/products-and-services/smr/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Sharma, M.; Luthra, S.; Joshi, S.; Kumar, A. Implementing challenges of artificial intelligence: Evidence from public manufacturing sector of an emerging economy. Gov. Inf. Q. 2022, 39, 101624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagg, D.J.; Worden, K.; Barthorpe, R.J.; Gardner, P. Digital Twins: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions for Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Engrg. Sys. Part B Mech. Engrg. 2020, 6, 030901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Guennec, A.; Malinowski, S.; Tavenard, R. Data augmentation for time series classification using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD Workshop on Advanced Analytics and Learning on Temporal Data, Porto, Portugal, 20 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Rashid, K.M.; Louis, J. Times-series data augmentation and deep learning for construction equipment activity recognition. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 42, 100944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toshniwal, D. Application of data mining techniques for nuclear data and instrumentation. In Proceedings of the DAE-BRNS National Symposium on Nuclear Instrumentation-2013: Invited Talks and Contributory Papers, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India, 19–21 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Durán-Rosal, A.M.; Guijo-Rubio, D. Machine Learning Applications in Real-World Time Series Problems. Mach. Learn. Algorithms Appl. Eng. 2023, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, Z. Improving computational efficiency of machine learning modeling of nonlinear processes using sensitivity analysis and active learning. Digit. Chem. Eng. 2022, 3, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martín, E.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Riley, G.; Grahn, H. Estimation of energy consumption in machine learning. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 2019, 134, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, B. How to Reduce the Training Time of Your Neural Network from Hours to Minutes. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-reduce-the-training-time-of-your-neural-network-from-hours-to-minutes-fe7533a3eec (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Keller, J. U.S. Nuclear Regulators Seek to Apply AI and Machine Learning to Cyber Security at Nuclear Power Plants. Available online: https://www.militaryaerospace.com/trusted-computing/article/14233131/cyber-security-nuclear-power-ai-and-machine-learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Lee, S.; Huh, J.H. An effective security measures for nuclear power plant using big data analysis approach. J. Supercomput. 2019, 75, 4267–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Hines, J.W.; Coble, J.B. A robust cybersecurity solution platform architecture for digital instrumentation and control systems in nuclear power facilities. Nucl. Technol. 2020, 206, 939–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.W.; Lee, S.J. A quantitative assessment framework for cyber-attack scenarios on nuclear power plants using relative difficulty and consequence. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2020, 142, 107432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Ni, K.; Hawari, A. An Artificial Neural Network Based Anomaly Detection Algorithm for Nuclear Power Plants. Transactions 2019, 120, 219–222. [Google Scholar]
- Racheal, S.; Liu, Y.; Ayodeji, A. Improved WaveNet for pressurized water reactor accident prediction. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2023, 181, 109519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Racheal, S.; Liu, Y.; Ayodeji, A. Evaluation of optimized machine learning models for nuclear reactor accident prediction. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2022, 149, 104263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, B.K.; Glisic, B.; Kim, Y.; Park, H.S. Convolutional neural network–based data recovery method for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 2020, 19, 1821–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, J.; Wang, H.; Spencer, B.F., Jr. Toward data anomaly detection for automated structural health monitoring: Exploiting generative adversarial nets and autoencoders. Struct. Health Monit. 2021, 20, 1609–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, M. Interpretable Machine Learning. Available online: https://www.datarevenue.com/en-blog/interpretable-machine-learning (accessed on 15 January 2023).
- Ghosh, B.; Malioutov, D.; Meel, K.S. Efficient learning of interpretable classification rules. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2022, 74, 1823–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudin, C.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z.; Huang, H.; Semenova, L.; Zhong, C. Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges. Stat. Surv. 2022, 16, 1–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cross, E.J.; Gibson, S.J.; Jones, M.R.; Pitchforth, D.J.; Zhang, S.; Rogers, T.J. Physics-informed machine learning for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. Based Data Sci. Tech. 2022, 21, 347–367. [Google Scholar]
- He, W.; Li, Q.; Ma, Y.; Niu, Z.; Pei, J.; Zhang, Y. Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2301.06396. [Google Scholar]
- Raissi, M.; Perdikaris, P.; Karniadakis, G.E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2019, 378, 686–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccione, A.; Berkery, J.; Sabbagh, S.; Andreopoulos, Y. Physics-guided machine learning approaches to predict the ideal stability properties of fusion plasmas. Nucl. Fusion 2020, 60, 046033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiassi, E.; De Florio, M.; Ganapol, B.D.; Picca, P.; Furfaro, R. Physics-informed neural networks for the point kinetics equations for nuclear reactor dynamics. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2022, 167, 108833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elhareef, M.H.; Wu, Z. Physics-Informed Neural Network Method and Application to Nuclear Reactor Calculations: A Pilot Study. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2022, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radaideh, M.I.; Wolverton, I.; Joseph, J.; Tusar, J.J.; Otgonbaatar, U.; Roy, N.; Forget, B.; Shirvan, K. Physics-informed reinforcement learning optimization of nuclear assembly design. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2021, 372, 110966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applications | ML Algorithms | Training Features |
---|---|---|
Structural systems: steel and concrete buildings, bridge models, cantilever beams, stadium seating grandstand, wind turbine foundations, structural plates, towers, nuclear piping | ANNs, CNNs, SVMs, K-means clustering, Kalman filtering | FRFs, FFT, PSD, STFT, WT, HHT, time-series data, images of sensor data, ultrasonic signals, electromagnetic impedance signatures, guided wave imaging |
Mechanical systems:wind turbine blades, aircraft wings, automobiles, product design | ANNs, CNNs, SVMs, DBN, GA, Fuzzy logic, Decision trees, Kalman filtering | Time-series data, guided waves, sensor data on machine-specific features, images of equipment |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sandhu, H.K.; Bodda, S.S.; Gupta, A. A Future with Machine Learning: Review of Condition Assessment of Structures and Mechanical Systems in Nuclear Facilities. Energies 2023, 16, 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062628
Sandhu HK, Bodda SS, Gupta A. A Future with Machine Learning: Review of Condition Assessment of Structures and Mechanical Systems in Nuclear Facilities. Energies. 2023; 16(6):2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062628
Chicago/Turabian StyleSandhu, Harleen Kaur, Saran Srikanth Bodda, and Abhinav Gupta. 2023. "A Future with Machine Learning: Review of Condition Assessment of Structures and Mechanical Systems in Nuclear Facilities" Energies 16, no. 6: 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062628
APA StyleSandhu, H. K., Bodda, S. S., & Gupta, A. (2023). A Future with Machine Learning: Review of Condition Assessment of Structures and Mechanical Systems in Nuclear Facilities. Energies, 16(6), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062628