Next Article in Journal
Consequences of Non-Compliance with Technological Procedures in the Realisation of Construction Objects from the Point of View of Heat Consumption for Heating—A Case Study on Selected Construction Sites in the Slovak Republic
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Electrical Characteristics Analysis and Electrical Circuit Model Design of Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Systems Based on Current and Flow Rate Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 17
Issue 23
10.3390/en17235842
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Origin, Migration, and Accumulation of Crude Oils in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin: Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling

by
Yang Shi
1,*,
Hao Guo
1,
Xiaohan Li
1,
Huiqi Li
1,
Meijun Li
2,3,
Xin Wang
2,*,
Surui Dong
2 and
Xi He
2
1
Southern Oil Exploration and Development Company, PetroChina, Haikou 570216, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
3
Faculty of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(23), 5842; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235842 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 October 2024 / Revised: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 20 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Coal, Petroleum, and Natural Gas Exploration Technology, 3rd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Fushan Depression is a hydrocarbon-rich depression in the Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea. In this study, 14 source rocks and 19 crude oils from the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone and Southern Slope Zone were geochemically analyzed to determine their origins. The hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation processes were also determined using two-dimensional basin modeling. Crude oils from the low-step area show a close relationship with the source rocks of the first and second members of the Eocene Liushagang Formation (Els1 and Els2). The oils from the middle-step area and the Southern Slope Zone are derived from the local source rocks in those areas, in the third member of the Eocene Liushagang Formation (Els3). Hydrocarbons generated from the Els3 source rocks of the Southern Slope Zone migrated along sand bodies to the Els3 reservoir. The fault system of the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone controls hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the low-step and middle-step areas. The resource potential of the middle-step area is limited by its shallow burial depth. The low-step area is a more favorable exploration area due to its proximity to the source kitchen.

1. Introduction

Understanding the oil–source relationships and hydrocarbon accumulation process is crucial for determining favorable exploration targets [1,2,3]. The Fushan Depression is an important hydrocarbon-rich depression in the Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea, with an area of 29,200 km2. The oils discovered in the region originate from the source rocks of the Paleogene Liushagang Formation (Els) [4,5]. Two secondary faults—the Meihua and Lianhua Faults—divide the entire Fushan Depression into the Huangtong/Bailian Sag and the Southern Slope Zone. The tectonic transfer zone in the central part of the depression is related to the regional tectonic stress field [6,7,8]. In the early stages of exploration, the main hydrocarbon target areas were the tectonic transfer zone and the eastern part of the Southern Slope Zone. The depositional characteristics, tectonic style, and hydrocarbon accumulation model of this area have been described in detail [9,10,11,12,13]. In recent years, the western area of the Fushan Depression has shown great exploration potential, with the discovery of the Chaoyang, Yong’an, Hongguang, and Meitai oilfields [4,14].
Geochemical analysis has identified three oil groups in the area [14,15], and all the Paleogene reservoirs in the depression were charged in the same, single hydrocarbon charging episode [14,16]. The effective source rocks in the western area of the Fushan Depression are in the central and northern parts of the Huangtong Sag, and the Chaoyang and Yong’an areas adjacent to the Huangtong Sag are expected to be favorable exploration areas [4]. The Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, located in the northwest margin of the Fushan Depression, is divided into middle- and low-step areas by the Bohou Fault. The low-step area is adjacent to the Huangtong Sag and has attracted increasing attention for its exploration potential [17]. However, hydrocarbons have also been discovered in the middle-step area in recent years, although their geochemical characteristics and origins have not been confirmed and the correlation between the oils in the middle-step and the low-step areas has not yet been established. Against this background, systematic analysis of the origins, migration, and accumulation of the hydrocarbons in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone is essential to understanding the exploration potential of the area.
In this study, oil sources were identified by geochemical analysis. The hydrocarbon migration and accumulation processes were determined using basin modeling techniques, supported by fluid inclusion data. A comprehensive understanding of the origins and accumulation of hydrocarbons in the study area is of great significance for determining favorable exploration areas and reducing oil and gas exploration risk.

2. Geological Setting

The Fushan Depression, located in the southeast of the Beibuwan Basin, is a typical rift subsidence lacustrine basin characterized by multiphase structural superposition. The western area of the depression is divided into the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, the Huangtong Sag, and the Southern Slope Zone from north to south (Figure 1). In the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, two areas—the middle-step area and the low-step area—are divided by the Bohou Fault.
The Shenhu, Zhuqiong, and Nanhai tectonic movements, which occurred in the Paleogene, controlled the deposition of the Changliu Formation (Ech), the Liushagang Formation (Els), and the Weizhou Formation (Ewz), respectively [8]. The Changliu Formation and Weizhou Formation are mostly conglomerate-bearing sandstone and sandy mudstone deposits (the sedimentary facies is shown in the Figure 2) [18]. The Liushagang Formation is generally a delta–lacustrine sedimentary system, and is the main source and oil-bearing bed. Small amounts of hydrocarbon accumulated in the Changliu Formation and Weizhou Formation. The Liushagang Formation is divided into three sub-members—Els3, Els2, and Els1, corresponding to the SQls3, SQls2, and SQls1 sequences, respectively (Figure 2) [18]. The sediments were supplied from the fan delta in the northwestern margin and the braided river delta in the southern margin [19,20,21]. The Els3 stratum is missing in the low-step area and the Huangtong Sag, which may be due to the extension of the Bohou and Meihua Faults (Figure 1).
The crude oils found in the Southern Slope Zone are mainly in Els3, whereas the reservoirs in the low-step area of the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone are in Els1 and Els2. In recent years, hydrocarbon shows have also been discovered in the Els3 and Ech in the middle-step area.

3. Samples and Methods

3.1. Samples

A total of 51 source rock samples were collected from the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone and the Southern Slope Zone, including Els3 source rocks from the middle-step area, Els1 and Els2 source rocks from the low-step area, and Els3 source rocks from the Southern Slope Zone. The sampling wells are shown in Figure 1. Total organic carbon (TOC) content measurement and pyrolysis analysis were performed to identify their hydrocarbon generation potential. Fourteen samples were selected for further biomarker analysis. Nine crude oils were collected from the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone; seven from the Els1 and Els2 reservoirs in the low-step area; and two from the Els3 and Ech reservoirs in the middle-step area. In addition, ten sets of geochemical data were collected from previous studies to compare the distinctions of crude oils between the Southern Slope Zone and the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone [14]. Oil–source correlation was carried out for the core and oil samples using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) on the saturated and aromatic fractions. In addition, two Ech reservoir sandstone samples from Well Ch23, drilled in the middle-step area, were polished for fluid inclusion observation and homogenization temperature measurement.

3.2. Geochemical Experiment

The core sample was ground into powder of less than 80 mesh. Carbonates were removed from the rock samples with hydrochloric acid prior to TOC measurement using a LECO CS-230 carbon sulfur analyzer manufactured by LECO in American (St. Joseph, MI, USA). The rock-eval parameters were obtained by heating 100 mg samples to 600 °C using an OGE-VI-type pyrolyzer manufactured by Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development in China (Beijing, China). The rock powder was extracted for 24 h using a Soxhlet apparatus with 400 mL of dichloromethane and methanol as the solvent (93:7, v:v). Asphaltene was removed from the source rock extracts and crude oil samples with 50 mL of n-hexane. The residue was separated into saturated and aromatics hydrocarbons in an alumina/silica gel column using 30 mL n-hexane and dichloromethane: n-hexane (2:1, v:v), respectively, as eluents. The biomarker compositions of the saturated and aromatic fractions were obtained using an Agilent 6890 GC-Agilent 5975i mass spectrometry system and an Agilent 7890B GC–Agilent 5977A MS system, respectively. The instruments were made by Agilent Corporation in American (Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Fluid inclusions were observed using a Leica polarization fluorescence microscope and fluorescence photometer, which were made in China. The homogenization temperatures were measured on brine inclusions associated with the hydrocarbons using the heating–freezing stage of a Linkham Model THMSG 600, which manufractured by Linkham Corporation in UK (Salfords, UK). The temperature was raised from 24 °C (room temperature) to the homogeneous temperature (Th) at a rate of 5 °C/min, and then held at Th for 1 min for temperature measurement.

3.3. Basin Modeling

Basin modeling is an effective tool for the analysis of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and accumulation [22]. A representative profile was selected for 2D basin modeling, and the process was as follows: (1) Stratigraphic model and fault model construction. The geological data, including stratigraphic data, fault data, well data, and erosion thickness, were collected from the Southern Oil Exploration and Development Company. The sealing capability of faults was assigned based on the main active periods. (2) Lithofacies model construction. The models were constructed according to the lithology and sedimentary characteristics of representative wells (Figure 3). The Liushagang Formation contains three lithofacies—deltaic mudstone, lacustrine mudstone, and sandstone. The deltaic and lacustrine mudstone serve as the source rocks. The TOC content and hydrocarbon index (HI) values for the source rocks were averaged from the experimental data. The Burnham (1989) T-II kinetics model was applied for hydrocarbon generation simulation [23], and the EASY% Ro model was applied for maturity calculation [24]. (3) Boundary condition setting. The paleo-water depths (PWD) for different positions and stratigraphic units were assigned based on their sedimentary facies [25]. The paleo-heat flow (PHF) was determined based on previous literature [14,26,27], and the sediment–water interface temperatures (SWIT) were obtained from the global paleothermal database [28]. Finally, a hybrid algorithm combining Darcy and percolation was used for hydrocarbon migration simulation.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Hydrocarbon Generating Potential of Source Rocks

Gray-dark mudstones occur widely in the study area, with TOC contents varying from 1.02% to 2.50%, and an average of 1.50%. The hydrocarbon potential index (S1+S2) is in the range of 1.71~10.06 mg/g. The S1+S2 versus TOC plot indicates good–excellent source rocks (Figure 4a, Table 1). The hydrogen index (HI) ranges from 136 to 414 mg/g, with the HI versus Tmax plot indicating the type II1 and II2 kerogen (Figure 4b, Table 1). There are no evident differences in hydrocarbon generation potential and kerogen types among the Els1, Els2, and Els3 source rocks. The Els3 source rocks from the Southern Slope Zone have slightly higher Tmax values, suggesting their relatively higher maturity.

4.2. Oil–Oil and Oil–Source Rock Correlations

The crude oils discovered in the middle-step area can be distinguished from that of the low-step area by analysis of the molecular markers in the saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons. Oil–source rock correlation indicates that the middle-step oils may be sourced from the local Els3 source rocks.

4.2.1. Normal Alkanes and Acyclic Isoprenoids

The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of the selected oil samples is shown in Figure 5. All the crude oils contain a complete normal alkanes distribution with carbon numbers ranging from nC12 to nC35. No evident odd carbon preference was observed in any of the oil samples, with both the carbon preference index (CPI) and the odd–even predominance (OEP) ratios being lower than 1.20, which suggests mature crude oils. All of the samples show high pristane (Pr) contents relative to phytane (Ph), with the Pr/Ph ratios ranging from 3.36 to 4.45, indicating that the source rocks were deposited in a typical oxidizing environment (Figure 5).

4.2.2. Distribution of Terpanes and Hopanes

Tricyclic terpanes were detected in all the source rock and crude oil samples. The Els1 and Els2 crude oils have relatively higher contents of C19 TT, C20 TT, and oleanane (OL), with the C19+20/C21TT and OL/C30H in the ranges 3.43~4.16 and 0.25~0.43, respectively (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The Els3 crude oils are characterized by high abundance of C23 TT and low abundance of oleanane, with C19+20/C21TT and OL/C30H in the ranges 1.66~2.64 and 0.15~0.24, respectively. (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Three unusual tetracyclic terpanes were present in all the crude oil samples, identified as C24-des-A-oleanane, C24-des-A-lupane, and C24-des-A-ursane (marked by peaks Y1, X1, and Z). The Els1 and Els2 crude oils and source rocks contain high levels of these unusual tetracyclic terpanes, where the levels in the Els3 crude oil and source rocks are low (Figure 6).
C19 and C20 TT are more abundant in source rocks deposited in shallow-water environments with terrigenous plant input, while C23TT predominates in crude oils from normal marine and saline lacustrine environments. The TT series is less affected by thermal maturity and biodegradation, so their relative contents can be used as effective indicators for oil–oil and oil–source correlation [31,32]. Oleanane (OL) is considered to be derived from angiosperm, which is generally abundant in source rocks and crude oils with high inputs from terrestrial plants. Three unusual tetracyclic terpanes (Y1, X1, and Z) were identified, which are similar to oleanane, lupane, and ursane in their molecular structure, and may also originate from higher plants [33,34,35]. Related parameters, such as OL/C30H, Y1/(Y1+C24TT), X1/(X1+C24TT), and Z/(Z+C24TT), are commonly applied for oil–source correlation [34,36]. The Els1, Els2, and Els3 source rocks show significant differences in their organic matter sources. The Els1 and Els2 source rocks are rich in C19TT, C20TT, oleanane, and the unusual tetracyclic terpanes, suggesting a greater contribution from terrestrial plants. The Els3 source rocks are characterized by a high content of C23TT and low contents of oleanane and the unusual tetracyclic terpanes, indicating predominantly algal input.
The distinguishing factors between the oil samples and the correlations between oil and source rocks are shown in Figure 8. The results suggest that the crude oils in the Chaoyang Step Zone are divided into two groups: an oil family distributed in the low-step area and outlier oils derived from the Els3 source rocks in the middle-step area. The distribution of terpanes in these outlier oils is consistent with the Els3 crude oils from the Southern Slope Zone (Figure 8).

4.2.3. Distribution of Steranes and Methyl Triaromatic Steroids

The distribution of C27–C29 regular steranes (C27–C29 St) in source rocks and crude oils reflects the organic matter input. All the crude oils in the study are characterized by “V-shaped” distribution patterns of C27–C28–C29 steranes, indicating mixed contributions from lower aquatic organisms and higher plants in the related source rocks [35]. C30 4α-methyl-24-ethylcholestanes (C30 4-Me St) and triaromatic dinosteroids (dino-TAS) were also detected in both the source rock and crude oil samples (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The Els3 source rocks and crude oils from the Southern Slope Zone contain high levels of C30 4-Me St and low levels of dino-TAS, with the triaromatic dinosteroid index (TDSI) varying from 0.22 to 0.32. In contrast, dino-TAS is present in the crude oils and source rocks from the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone (both the low-step area and the middle-step area) in considerable abundance with higher TDSI, ranging from 0.33 to 0.59, with an average of 0.42.
C30 4-Me St and dino-TAS are both derived from dinoflagellates, and the related parameters, such as C30 4-Me/C29 St and TDSI, provide effective means to evaluate the organic matter sources of source rocks and are therefore widely applied for oil–source correlation [37,38,39,40]. A negative correlation between C30 4-Me St and dino-TAS can be attributed to the depositional environment, with a sub-oxic and fresh environment being conducive to the formation of C30 4-Me St [41]. All the Els3 crude oils and source rocks from Southern Slope Zone are closely plotted in Figure 11, indicating strong affinity between them. The Els3 crude oils from the middle-step area display a close relationship to the Els3 source rocks of the middle-step area (Figure 8 and Figure 11).

4.2.4. Maturity of Crude Oils

The maturity parameters of aromatic hydrocarbons are widely applied in assessing crude oil maturity [42]. The Phenanthrene Distribution Fraction (MPDF), calculated by the relative abundances of the four isomers of methylphenanthrene, has been used as a thermal maturity indicator [43,44]. According to the cross plot of MPDF parameters (F1 and F2), the crude oils from the low-step area and the Southern Slope Zone are in the mature stage, while the data points of the crude oils from the middle-step area indicate low maturity (Figure 12). The maturity of the crude oils in the middle-step area is the lowest.

4.3. Modeling of Oil Generation, Migration, and Accumulation

4.3.1. Source Rock Maturity History

The maturity of organic matter is related to the burial depth and heat flow, and vitrinite reflectance (Ro%) is usually applied to evaluate the maturity. The transformation ratio (TR) refers to the proportion of organic matter in the source rock that is transformed into hydrocarbons during the thermal maturation process. Generally, the higher thermal maturity corresponds to the higher TR [45,46]. Figure 13 shows the evolution of the maturity and TR with geological time for the profile AA’.
The Els2 source rocks in the Huangtong Sag and some of the Els3 source rocks in the Southern Slope Zone entered the oil generation window (Ro > 0.5%) at 30 Ma. During the period 30–23.5 Ma, the strata were subjected to burial, uplift, and denudation, and the Els1 source rocks in the Huangtong Sag, some of the Els2 source rocks in the Southern Slope Zone, and the Els3 source rocks in the middle step reached the mature stage. The Els2 source rocks in the Huangtong Sag and the Els3 source rocks in the Southern Slope Zone apparently entered the main oil generation stage (Ro > 0.7%). At 23.5–10 Ma, since the low deposition rate of Neogene [20], the thermal evolution degree of the source rocks at 10 Ma is similar to that at 23.5 Ma, with a maximum TR exceeding 80%. At present, both the Els1 and Els2 source rocks in the Huangtong Sag are in the peak period for oil generation, with maximum Ro up to 1.2% and TR up to 100%. The maximum Ro of the Els3 source rocks in the middle step is 0.68%, with a TR of 40%.
Comparison of hydrocarbon generation in the different source rocks over geological time indicates that the source rocks in the Fushan Depression began to generate hydrocarbons at 30 Ma (Figure 14). The Els2 source rocks in the low-step area and the Els3 source rocks in the Southern Slope Zone are characterized by long hydrocarbon generation periods and large hydrocarbon-generation mass. The Els3 source rocks in the middle-step area generated hydrocarbons at around 20 Ma, but with the smallest hydrocarbon-generation mass due to their low maturity.

4.3.2. Hydrocarbon Generation, Migration, and Accumulation History

Figure 15 shows that the simulated oil reservoirs are mostly distributed in the Huangtong Sag and the fault footwall of the Southern Slope Zone, with some hydrocarbon accumulation also occurring in the Els3 and Ech reservoirs in the middle step. The simulation results are consistent with the actual exploration results of hydrocarbon reservoirs.
At 25 Ma, most of the hydrocarbons generated from the Els3 source rocks of the Southern Slope Zone and the Els2 source rocks of the Huangtong Sag escaped along active faults, particularly the Meihua and Bohou Faults. Due to well sealing of the antithetic faults, only small amounts of hydrocarbons accumulated in the fault footwall of the Southern Slope Zone. At 25–10 Ma, the hydrocarbon generation centers were still concentrated in the Els3 source rocks of the Southern Slope Zone and the Els2 source rocks of the Huangtong Sag, with a few accumulations occurring near the hydrocarbon generating center. At 10–0 Ma, the hydrocarbons generated from the Els3 source rocks migrated along sandbodies to the Southern Slope Zone and accumulated in the fault footwall. The hydrocarbon migration orientation indicated by the geochemical parameters [9] is consistent with the simulation results. The crude oils from the low-step area are mostly distributed in the hanging wall of the consequent fault and the footwall of the antithetic fault. The faults in the low-step area are crucial for hydrocarbon accumulation. The low-step area is adjacent to the hydrocarbon generation center, so the hydrocarbons had to migrate only a short distance along the fault. The hydrocarbons accumulated in the upper part of Els3 in the middle step area were generated in the lower part of the Els3 source rocks, with the consequent fault as the migration conduit. The good sealing properties of the Els2 thick mudstone in the middle step area, combined with high overburden pressure, caused the hydrocarbons to migrate downwards along the fault to the Changliu Reservoir.

4.3.3. Fluid Inclusion Evidence

Two oil sands from Ech in well Ch23 were sampled for homogenization temperature measurement of their fluid inclusions. The sandstone samples exhibited pale yellow fluorescence, and their homogenization temperatures ranged from 90 to 95 °C. The depositional burial and thermal histories of well Ch23 were reconstructed using Petromod-1D software, calibrated according to the measured Ro. The maximum current buried temperature is 98° (Figure 16). The episodes and timing of oil charging were determined from the reconstructed burial and thermal histories, indicating that the main oil charging time in the Ech reservoirs in Well Ch23 was from the end of the mid-Miocene to the early Pliocene (8–3 Ma), with only a single charging episode occurring. The oil charging time of the Southern Slope Zone and the low-step area was determined to be between 10 and 0 Ma [9,11].

4.4. Implications for Petroleum Exploration

Based on the systematic oil-oil and oil-source rock correlations, the crude oils in this study can be divided into three types, two of which have been reported in previous studies [9,10]. The oil migration and accumulation model for the study area is shown in the Figure 17. In terms of the static factors and dynamic processes for hydrocarbon accumulation, three petroleum system—the Southern Slope Zone petroleum system, the Huangtong Sag petroleum system and the Chaoyang middle-step petroleum system—are divided by the Meihua Fault and Bohou Fault.
The crude oils in the Els3 reservoir in the Southern Slope Zone were generated from the Els3 source rocks. The hydrocarbons migrated southward along the sandbodies and accumulated in the footwall of the antithetic fault. The hydrocarbon in the Huangtong Sag petroleum system migrated upwards along the fault, which is verified by the parameters of geochemical tracers, such as 4-/1-methyldibenzothiophene and 1-/4-methodibenzofuran [9]. The Els3 and Ech oils from the middle step area—of a previously unreported type—were generated from the Els3 source rocks in the middle step area.
Although the Els3 source rocks in the middle step area are thought to be good to excellent source rocks, their poor hydrocarbon generation capacity in situ is revealed by the two-dimensional simulation and can be explained by their shallow burial depth. Despite the discovery of these new-type oils in the middle-step area, hydrocarbon shows have only occurred in a few wells. The low-step area is a more favorable exploration area than the middle-step area because of its near-source advantages.

5. Conclusions

The crude oils from the middle-step area are identified for the first time as a new oil group. This new oil group was generated locally from the Els3 source rocks in the middle-step area. The principal distinguishing factors between the two established oil groups and this new group are the distributions of C19~C23 tricyclic terpanes, oleanane, C30 4-methyl-24-ethylcholestanes, and methyl triaromatic dinosteroids.
Three petroleum systems—the Southern Slope Zone petroleum system, the Huangtong Sag and low-step petroleum system, and the Chaoyang middle-step petroleum system—are divided by the Meihua Fault and Bohou Fault. The hydrocarbons generated from the Els1 and Els2 source rocks in the Huangtong Sag migrated to the Els1 and Els2 reservoirs in the lower-step area. The source rocks in the Huangtong Sag are in the peak oil generation stage at present, while the Els3 source rocks in the middle-step area are in the early stage, with the hydrocarbons migrating along the fault to the upper part of the Els3 reservoir. Only one hydrocarbon charging episode has been identified for the middle-step area, around the end of the middle Miocene to the early Pliocene (10–0 Ma).
Although the hydrocarbon shows have occurred in the Els3 and Ech in the middle-step area, the resource potential of the middle-step area is limited by its shallow burial depth. The low-step area, adjacent to the Huangtong Sag, is a more favorable exploration area due to its proximity to its source. The footwall of the antithetic fault near the Huangtong Sag is identified as the most favorable exploration target.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S. and H.G.; methodology, X.L. and H.L.; software, X.L. and X.W.; validation, M.L., S.D. and X.H.; formal analysis, M.L., S.D. and X.H.; investigation, M.L., S.D. and X.H.; resources, X.W.; data curation, X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, H.G. and X.L.; visualization, H.G.; supervision, Y.S., S.D. and X.H.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, Y.S and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the South Oil Exploration and Development Company of PetroChina (2024-HNYJ-018).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shi Shengbao, Zhu Lei, and Zhang Jianfeng of China University of Petroleum (Beijing) for their assistance and guidance during the experiment. We also appreciate the reviewers and editors for their suggestions and comments.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yang Shi, Hao Guo, Xiaohan Li and Huiqi Li were employed by the Southern Oil Exploration and Development Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schwangler, M.; Harris, N.B.; Waldron, J.W.F. Source rock characterization and oil-to-source rock correlation of a Cambrian-Ordovician fold-and-thrust belt petroleum system, western Newfoundland. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2020, 115, 104283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, L.G.; Fuhrmann, A.; Poelchau, H.S.; Horsfield, B.; Zhang, Z.W.; Wu, T.S.; Chen, Y.X.; Li, J.Y. Numerical simulation of petroleum generation and migration in the Qingshui sag, western depression of the Liaohe basin, northeast China. AAPG Bull. 2005, 89, 1629–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shabani, F.; Amini, A.; Tavakoli, V.; Honarmand, J.; Gong, C.R. 3D forward stratigraphic modeling of the Albian succession in a part of the northeastern margin of the Arabian Plate and its implications for exploration of subtle traps. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2022, 145, 105880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, B.; Li, M.J.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.Z.; Gong, C.L.; Lai, J.; Shi, Y. Source rock evaluation within a sequence stratigraphic framework of the Paleogene Liushagang Formation in the Fushan Depression, South China Sea. Geol. J. 2022, 57, 2409–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeng, B.; Li, M.J.; Wang, N.; Shi, Y.; Wang, F.Z.; Wang, X. Geochemistry and heterogeneous accumulation of organic matter in lacustrine basins: A case study of the Eocene Liushagang Formation in the Fushan Depression, South China Sea. Petrol. Sci. 2022, 19, 2533–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, E.T.; Wang, H.; Lin, Z.L.; Li, Y.; Ma, Q.L. Characteristics and hydrocarbon enrichment rules of transfer zone in Fushan Sag, Beibuwan Basin. J. Cent. South Univ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 43, 3946–3953. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, E.T.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Leonard, N.D.; Feng, Y.X.; Pan, S.Q.; Xia, C.Y. Relative role of accommodation zones in controlling stratal architectural variability and facies distribution: Insights from the Fushan Depression, South China Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 68, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Z.W.; Liu, Z.F.; Zhang, G.C.; Zhao, Z.G.; Xu, J.Y. The chasmic stage and structural evolution features of Beibuwan Basin. J. Oil Gas Technol. 2013, 35, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, M.J.; Wang, T.G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.Z.; Lu, H.; Ma, Q.L.; Gao, L.H. Oil charging orientation and accumulation characteristics of oil reservoirs in the Fushan sag, Beibuwan basin. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2007, 29, 172–177. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Gan, H.J.; Wang, H.; Shi, Y.; Ma, Q.L.; Liu, E.T.; Yan, D.T.; Pan, Z.J. Geochemical characteristics and genetic origin of crude oil in the Fushan sag, Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020, 112, 104114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gan, H.J.; Gong, S.; Tian, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Ma, Q.L.; Liu, K.X.; Lv, Z.H. Geochemical characteristics of inclusion oils and charge history in the Fushan Sag, Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea. Appl. Geochem. 2023, 150, 105598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, G.H.; Wang, H.; Gan, H.J.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, Y.D.; Chen, S.B. Oil source and migration process in oblique transfer zone of Fushan Sag, northern South China Sea. J. Cent. South Univ. 2016, 23, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qi, Z.G.; Lu, Z.H.; Jiang, F.J.; Song, Z.Z.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Guo, J.; Fang, Z.; Wang, X.R.; Liu, Y.L. Controlling factors of hydrocarbon distribution and source-migration-accumulation model in Fushan Depression. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. Chin. Ed. 2024, 53, 777–792. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, X.; Lu, Z.H.; Li, M.J.; Guo, H.; Zhu, Z.L.; Li, X.H.; Yang, C.Y.; Zeng, B.; Wang, F.Z.; Ran, Z.C. Petroleum charging history of the Paleogene sandstone reservoirs in the Huangtong Sag of the Fushan Depression, South China Sea. Energies 2022, 15, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, Z.H.; Gan, H.J.; Shi, Y.; Chen, S.B.; Wang, H.; Ma, Q.L. Geochemical Characteristics of crude oil and oil-source correlation in the western Fushan Depression. Earth Sci. 2016, 41, 1909–1920. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, M.J.; Wang, T.G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.Z.; Lu, H.; Ma, Q.L.; Gao, L.H. Characteristics of oil and gas accumulation in Yong’an-Meitai area of the Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea. Pet. Sci. 2007, 4, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  17. Qin, Q.H.; Lei, D.; Song, X.W.; Su, J.Q.; Ren, G.Y.; Liu, D.S.; Ma, Q.L.; Lu, Z.H.; Guo, H.; Liao, F.Y.; et al. Geological conditions and the main controlling factors for the tight oil accumulation in Liushagang Formation of Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin. Bull. Geol. Sci. Technol. 2021, 40, 1–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma, Q.L.; Zhao, S.E.; Liao, Y.T.; Lin, Z.L. Sequence architectures of Paleogene Liushagang Formation and its significance in Fushan Sag of the Beibuwan Basin. J. China Univ. Geosci. Chin. Ed. 2012, 37, 667–678. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, E.T.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Leonard, N.D.; Lin, Z.L.; Ma, Q.L. Sedimentary characteristics and tectonic setting of sublacustrine fans in a half-graben rift depression, Beibuwan Basin, South China Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2014, 52, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, Q.Q.; Hu, J.; Lei, D.; Li, Z.W.; Tang, R.; Hu, S.B. Provenance evolution of the Fushan Sag (Hainan Island, Southern China): Constraints from U-Pb geochronology on detrital zircons. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2024, 168, 107037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Wang, H.; Luo, D. Depositional setting analysis using seismic sedimentology: Example from the Paleogene Liushagang sequence in the Fushan depression, South China Sea. Geodesy Geodyn. 2017, 8, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Hajeri, M.M.; Al Saeed, M.; Derks, J.; Fuchs, T.; Hantschel, T.; Kauerauf, A.; Neumaier, M.; Schenk, O.; Swientek, O.; Tessen, N. Basin and petroleum system modeling. Oilfield Rev. 2009, 21, 14–29. [Google Scholar]
  23. Burnham, A.K.; Sweeney, J.J. A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1989, 53, 2649–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sweeney, J.J.; Burnham, A.K. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics. AAPG Bull. 1990, 74, 1559–1570. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, L.; Gan, H.; Zhu, C.; Tian, J. Study on Subsidence History of Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin. J. Xinjiang Pet. Inst. 2002, 14, 12–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, S.B.; Gan, H.J.; Xia, C.Y.; Zhao, Y.D.; Wang, G.H.; Wang, X. History simulation of thermal evolution and hydrocarbon generation of source rocks in Bailian sub-Sag, Fushan Sag, Beibuwan Basin. Xinjiang Pet. Geol. 2014, 35, 672–677. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Zeng, B.; Lu, Z.; Yang, T.; Shi, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, X.; Liao, F.; Li, M. Hydrocarbon Generation History of the Eocene Source Rocks in the Fushan Depression, South China Sea: Insights from a Basin Modeling Study. Processes 2023, 11, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wygrala, B.P. Integrated Study of an Oil Field in the Southern Po Basin, Northern Italy; KFK: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1989; 325p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Robison, C.R.; Smith, M.A.; Royle, R.A. Organic facies in Cretaceous and Jurassic hydrocarbon source rocks, Southern Indus basin, Pakistan. Int. J. Coal Geol. 1999, 39, 205–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mukhopadhyay, P.K.; Wade, J.A.; Kruge, M.A. Organic facies and maturation of Jurassic/Cretaceous rocks, and possible oil-source rock correlation based on pyrolysis of asphaltenes, Scotian Basin, Canada. Org. Geochem. 1995, 22, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, H.; Li, M.J.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, Z.L. The distribution patterns and geochemical implication of C19–C23 tricyclic terpanes in source rocks and crude oils occurred in various depositional environment. Geochemica 2019, 48, 161–170. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiao, H.; Li, M.J.; Nettersheim, B.J. Short chain tricyclic terpanes as organic proxies for paleo-depositional conditions. Chem. Geol. 2024, 652, 122023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Samuel, O.J.; Kildahl-Andersen, G.; Nytoft, H.P.; Johansen, J.E.; Jones, M. Novel tricyclic and tetracyclic terpanes in Tertiary deltaic oils: Structural identification, origin and application to petroleum correlation. Org. Geochem. 2010, 41, 1326–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, H.; Wang, T.G.; Li, M.J.; Fu, J.; Tang, Y.J.; Shi, S.B.; Yang, Z.; Lu, X.L. Occurrence and Distribution of Unusual Tri- and Tetracyclic Terpanes and Their Geochemical Significance in Some Paleogene Oils from China. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 7393–7403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peters, K.E.; Moldowan, J.M. The Biomarker Guide: Interpreting Molecular Fossils in Petroleum and Ancient Sediments, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridgeshire, UK, 2005; pp. 572–575. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fu, J.; Chen, C.; Li, M.J.; Zhang, Z.T.; Long, Z.L.; Wang, T.G.; Lu, X.L. Petroleum charging history of Neogene reservoir in the Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China sea. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 190, 106945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, H.; Li, M.J.; Liu, J.G.; Mao, F.J.; Cheng, D.S.; Yang, Z. Oil-oil and oil-source rock correlations in the Muglad Basin, Sudan and South Sudan: New insights from molecular markers analyses. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2019, 103, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boon, J.J.; Rijpstra, W.I.C.; De Lange, F.; De Leeuw, J.W.; Yoshioka, M.; Shimizu, Y. Black sea sterol-a molecular fossil for dinoflagellate blooms. Nature 1979, 277, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. You, B.; Ni, Z.Y.; Chen, J.F.; Wang, G.L.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.S.; Song, G.Q. A distinct oil group in the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China: New insights from norcholestane and triaromatic steroid analyses. Org. Geochem. 2021, 162, 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, D.Y.; Li, M.J.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.F.; Li, E.T.; Jin, J.; Zou, X.L.; Xu, B.D. The distribution of triaromatic steroids in Permian source rocks and implications for oil-source correlations in the Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2022, 33, 1862–1873. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Chang, R.; Wang, G.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Li, H.Y.; Cao, L.; Xia, H.Y. Distribution and Genesis of Dinoflagellate-derived Molecular Fossils in Beibuwan Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2023, 41, 280–288. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  42. Chakhmakhchev, A.; Suzuki, N. Saturate biomarkers and aromatic sulfur compounds in oils and condensates from different source rock lithologies of Kazakhstan, Japan and Russia. Org. Geochem. 1995, 23, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kvalheim, O.M.; Christy, A.A.; Telnaes, N.; Bjørseth, A. Maturity determination of organic matter in coals using the methylphenanthrene distribution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1987, 51, 1883–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bao, J.P.; Wang, T.G.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Yu, F.X.; Wang, J.J.; Zhou, Q.L.; Chen, F.J. The relationship between methyl phenanthrene ratios and the evolution of organic matter. J. Jianghan Pet. Inst. 1992, 14, 8–19. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  45. Makeen, Y.M.; Abdullah, W.H.; Pearson, M.J.; Hakimi, M.H.; Ayinla, H.A.; Elhassan, O.M.; Abas, A.M. History of hydrocarbon generation, migration and accumulation in the Fula sub-basin, Muglad Basin, Sudan: Implications of a 2D basin modeling study. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 77, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, S.B.; Li, M.J.; Wang, Y.S.; Xiao, H.; Huang, S.Q.; Kang, W.J.; Wang, F.Z. Origin, Migration, and Characterization of Gas in the Xinglongtai Area, Liaohe Subbasin (Northeast China): Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling. Energies 2023, 16, 6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 17 05842 g001
Figure 1. Geological maps showing (a) the location of the Fushan Depression and (b) the tectonic distribution units and sampling wells in the Fushan Depression.
Figure 1. Geological maps showing (a) the location of the Fushan Depression and (b) the tectonic distribution units and sampling wells in the Fushan Depression.
Energies 17 05842 g001
Energies 17 05842 g002
Figure 2. Stratigraphic column and sequence division of the Fushan Depression (After Ma et al., 2012 [12]).
Figure 2. Stratigraphic column and sequence division of the Fushan Depression (After Ma et al., 2012 [12]).
Energies 17 05842 g002
Energies 17 05842 g003
Figure 3. Two-dimensional lithofacies models for the representative profiles in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone.
Figure 3. Two-dimensional lithofacies models for the representative profiles in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone.
Energies 17 05842 g003
Energies 17 05842 g004
Figure 4. Variation of (a) (S1+S2) with total organic carbon (TOC) content and (b) hydrogen index with Tmax for source rocks from the Fushan Depression showing the hydrocarbon-generating potential and organic matter type, respectively. (modified after Robison et al., 1999 [29] and Mukhopadhyay et al., 1995 [30]).
Figure 4. Variation of (a) (S1+S2) with total organic carbon (TOC) content and (b) hydrogen index with Tmax for source rocks from the Fushan Depression showing the hydrocarbon-generating potential and organic matter type, respectively. (modified after Robison et al., 1999 [29] and Mukhopadhyay et al., 1995 [30]).
Energies 17 05842 g004
Energies 17 05842 g005
Figure 5. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of the oil samples and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Figure 5. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of the oil samples and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Energies 17 05842 g005
Energies 17 05842 g006
Figure 6. Mass chromatograms (m/z 191) showing the distribution of tricyclic and tetracyclic terpanes in the crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Figure 6. Mass chromatograms (m/z 191) showing the distribution of tricyclic and tetracyclic terpanes in the crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Energies 17 05842 g006
Energies 17 05842 g007
Figure 7. Mass chromatograms (m/z 191) showing the distribution of hopanes in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Figure 7. Mass chromatograms (m/z 191) showing the distribution of hopanes in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Energies 17 05842 g007
Energies 17 05842 g008
Figure 8. Correlation between the relative abundance of tri- and tetracyclic terpanes in the studied oils and source rocks. (a) OL/C30H vs. C19+20/C23TT; (b) Z/(Z+C24TT) vs. C19+20/C21TT; (c) X1/(X1+C24TT) vs. Y1/(Y1+C24TT); (d) Y1/(Y1+C24TT) vs. OL/C30H. Note: OL = oleanane; TT = tricyclic terpane; Y1 = C24-des-A-oleanane, X1 = C24-des-A-lupane, Z = C24-des-A-ursane.
Figure 8. Correlation between the relative abundance of tri- and tetracyclic terpanes in the studied oils and source rocks. (a) OL/C30H vs. C19+20/C23TT; (b) Z/(Z+C24TT) vs. C19+20/C21TT; (c) X1/(X1+C24TT) vs. Y1/(Y1+C24TT); (d) Y1/(Y1+C24TT) vs. OL/C30H. Note: OL = oleanane; TT = tricyclic terpane; Y1 = C24-des-A-oleanane, X1 = C24-des-A-lupane, Z = C24-des-A-ursane.
Energies 17 05842 g008
Energies 17 05842 g009
Figure 9. Mass chromatograms (m/z 217) showing the distributions of steranes in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Figure 9. Mass chromatograms (m/z 217) showing the distributions of steranes in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m.
Energies 17 05842 g009
Energies 17 05842 g010
Figure 10. Mass chromatograms (m/z 245) of the aromatic fraction showing the distribution of methyl-triaromatic steroids in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m. Notes: 1 = C27 3-methyltriaromatic steroids; 2 = C27 4-methyltriaromatic steroids; 3 = C27 3-methyltriaromatic steroids + C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 4 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 5 = C27 4-methyltriaromatic steroids + C29 4-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 6 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 7 = C29 3-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 8 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 9 = C29 4-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 10 = C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 11 = C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 12 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 13 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 14 = C29 3-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 15 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 16 = C29 4α- methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 17 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids.
Figure 10. Mass chromatograms (m/z 245) of the aromatic fraction showing the distribution of methyl-triaromatic steroids in crude oils and source rocks from the Fushan Depression. (a) Els1 oil from low-step area, well Ch8, 2710 m; (b) Els3 oil from middle-step area, well Ch22, 2145 m; (c) Els3 oil from Southern Slope Zone, well M15-3, 3131; (d) Els1 source rock from low-step area, well Ch12, 2545 m; (e) Els3 source rock from middle-step area, well Ch23, 2386–2390 m; (f) Els3 source rock from Southern Slope Zone, well M17, 3803 m. Notes: 1 = C27 3-methyltriaromatic steroids; 2 = C27 4-methyltriaromatic steroids; 3 = C27 3-methyltriaromatic steroids + C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 4 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 5 = C27 4-methyltriaromatic steroids + C29 4-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 6 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 7 = C29 3-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 8 = C29 4,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 9 = C29 4-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 10 = C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 11 = C28 3,24-dimethyltriaromatic steroids; 12 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 13 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 14 = C29 3-methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 15 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids; 16 = C29 4α- methyl-24-ethyltriaromatic steroids; 17 = C29 4α,23,24-trimethyltriaromatic steroids.
Energies 17 05842 g010
Energies 17 05842 g011
Figure 11. Correlation between the relative abundances of methyl-triaromatic steroids relative abundance in the studied oils and source rocks.
Figure 11. Correlation between the relative abundances of methyl-triaromatic steroids relative abundance in the studied oils and source rocks.
Energies 17 05842 g011
Energies 17 05842 g012
Figure 12. Cross plot of the Methyl-Phenanthrene Distribution Fraction (MPDF) parameters F1 vs. F2 showing the maturity of crude oil samples.
Figure 12. Cross plot of the Methyl-Phenanthrene Distribution Fraction (MPDF) parameters F1 vs. F2 showing the maturity of crude oil samples.
Energies 17 05842 g012
Energies 17 05842 g013
Figure 13. Evolution of the maturity and the transformation ratio with age in Profile AA′. (a) Maturity history at 30 Ma; (b) maturity history at 23.5 Ma; (c) maturity history at 10 Ma; (d) maturity history at 0 Ma; (e) transformation ratio at 30 Ma; (f) transformation ratio at 23.5 Ma; (g) transformation ratio at 10 Ma; (h) transformation ratio at 0 Ma [24].
Figure 13. Evolution of the maturity and the transformation ratio with age in Profile AA′. (a) Maturity history at 30 Ma; (b) maturity history at 23.5 Ma; (c) maturity history at 10 Ma; (d) maturity history at 0 Ma; (e) transformation ratio at 30 Ma; (f) transformation ratio at 23.5 Ma; (g) transformation ratio at 10 Ma; (h) transformation ratio at 0 Ma [24].
Energies 17 05842 g013
Energies 17 05842 g014
Figure 14. Hydrocarbon generation in different source rocks over geological time.
Figure 14. Hydrocarbon generation in different source rocks over geological time.
Energies 17 05842 g014
Energies 17 05842 g015
Figure 15. Simulation results of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Profile AA’. (a) Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 25 Ma; (b) hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 10 Ma; (c) hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 0 Ma.
Figure 15. Simulation results of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Profile AA’. (a) Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 25 Ma; (b) hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 10 Ma; (c) hydrocarbon migration and accumulation at 0 Ma.
Energies 17 05842 g015
Energies 17 05842 g016
Figure 16. Timing and episodes of oil charging based on fluid inclusion observation and burial history—thermal history reconstruction of the Well Ch23.
Figure 16. Timing and episodes of oil charging based on fluid inclusion observation and burial history—thermal history reconstruction of the Well Ch23.
Energies 17 05842 g016
Energies 17 05842 g017
Figure 17. A conceptual model showing oil migration and accumulation in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone.
Figure 17. A conceptual model showing oil migration and accumulation in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone.
Energies 17 05842 g017
Table 1. TOC and rock-eval pyrolysis data for the Liushagang Formation source rock samples in the Fushan Depression.
Table 1. TOC and rock-eval pyrolysis data for the Liushagang Formation source rock samples in the Fushan Depression.
AreaWellDepth/mFm.TOCTmaxS1S2HI
Middle-step areaCh23x2036-2040Els31.744380.085.71328
Ch23x2085-2089Els32.504370.179.89396
Ch23x2135-2139Els31.584350.216.54414
Ch23x2187-2191Els31.224370.082.55209
Ch23x2235-2239Els31.714390.315.24306
Ch23x2285-2289Els31.784380.265.09285
Ch23x2335-2339Els32.024350.825.79286
Ch23x2386-2390Els32.104330.696.53311
Ch23x2435-2439Els31.234360.142.89236
Ch23x2535-2539Els31.134360.182.33206
Low-step areaCh12392.5Els11.164380.081.77153
Ch12467.88Els11.344360.394.14308
Ch22491.5Els11.274370.152.14168
Ch22493.5Els11.244380.112.15174
Ch22622.5Els11.264380.142.13169
Ch6x2412.1Els11.114370.242.55230
Ch6x2682.5Els11.424340.294.1288
Ch6x2686.1Els11.364380.184.07300
Ch12x2545.2Els11.384350.323.65265
Ch12x3473.5Els21.864400.685.95321
Ch12x3476Els21.304420.474.11315
Ch12x3512.2Els21.494410.554269
Ch12x3513.6Els21.234420.543.42278
Southern Slope ZoneHg52731Els31.364480.43.1228
Hg52732Els31.514470.33.32219
Hg52733.5Els31.154480.22.93255
M13075.07Els31.544490.464.29279
M13076.66Els32.034490.576.1300
M13108.42Els32.894450.889.18318
M13112.88Els31.124520.191.52136
M13169.48Els31.514460.272.57170
M23004.5Els31.034420.252.15209
M23045Els31.204430.362.76230
M23046.3Els31.144460.422.89253
M23051Els31.434420.354.93346
M43215Els31.444430.513.31230
M43217Els32.054440.867.22353
M43218.5Els31.154460.272.71236
M43221Els31.124430.393.44307
M43222.5Els31.184450.383.34283
M43223.5Els31.574450.474.52289
M43228.5Els31.164440.332.71234
M12Ax2660Els32.134300.766.27295
M17x3799.2Els31.024450.32.99295
M17x3802Els31.094480.232.94269
M17x3803.5Els31.384490.413.41248
M17x3804.4Els31.704490.534.18245
M17x3805Els31.174480.332.6223
Note: TOC: total organic carbon, wt%; Tmax: temperature at maximum generation, °C; S1: volatile hydrocarbon content, mg HC/g rock; S2: remaining hydrocarbon generative potential, mg HC/g rock; HI: hydrogen index = S2*100/TOC, mg HC/g TOC; Fm.: Formation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Dong, S.; He, X. Origin, Migration, and Accumulation of Crude Oils in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin: Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling. Energies 2024, 17, 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235842

AMA Style

Shi Y, Guo H, Li X, Li H, Li M, Wang X, Dong S, He X. Origin, Migration, and Accumulation of Crude Oils in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin: Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling. Energies. 2024; 17(23):5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yang, Hao Guo, Xiaohan Li, Huiqi Li, Meijun Li, Xin Wang, Surui Dong, and Xi He. 2024. "Origin, Migration, and Accumulation of Crude Oils in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin: Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling" Energies 17, no. 23: 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235842

APA Style

Shi, Y., Guo, H., Li, X., Li, H., Li, M., Wang, X., Dong, S., & He, X. (2024). Origin, Migration, and Accumulation of Crude Oils in the Chaoyang Step-Fault Zone, Fushan Depression, Beibuwan Basin: Insight from Geochemical Evidence and Basin Modeling. Energies, 17(23), 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop