Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Optimization of the Medium-Term Units Commitment of Thermal Power
Previous Article in Journal
Open-Phase Fault Tolerance Techniques of Five-Phase Dual-Rotor Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Non-Uniform High Heat Flux on Thermal Stress of Thermoelectric Power Generator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High Temperature Experimental Characterization Procedure for Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Generator Modules under Transient Conditions

1
Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
2
PANCO GmbH, Kaerlicher Str. 7 D-56218 Muelheim-Kaerlich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2015, 8(11), 12839-12847; https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112341
Submission received: 15 July 2015 / Revised: 1 November 2015 / Accepted: 2 November 2015 / Published: 12 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting)

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study is to analyze the steady-state and transient behavior of the electrical and thermal parameters of thermoelectric generators (TEGs). The focus is on the required wait-time between measurements in order to reduce measurement errors which may appear until the system reaches steady-state. By knowing this waiting time, the total characterization time can also be reduced. The experimental characterization process is performed on a test rig known as TEGeta, which can be used to assess the output characteristics of TEG modules under different load values and temperature conditions. The setup offers the possibility to control the hot side temperature up to 1000 °C with a load variation range value between 0.22–8.13 Ω. A total of ten thermocouples are placed in the setup with the purpose of measuring the temperature in specific points between the heater and the heat sink. Based on the readings, the temperature on the hot and cold side of the modules can be extrapolated. This study provides quantitative data on the minimum waiting time of the temperatures in the surrounding system to reach equilibrium. Laboratory tests are performed on a calcium-manganese oxide module at temperatures between 400 and 800 °C to explore the high temperatures features of the setup.

1. Introduction

The increasing interest in thermoelectric (TE) technology is leading to a need to develop a standardized method to characterize the performance of thermoelectric generator (TEG) modules, which is unavailable at the moment. However, there exist several measurement systems that can perform experimental parameter characterization of TEG modules [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Some of them are self-made, but there are also commercially available systems. Up to 2006, the majority of the commercially available modules were operating at a maximum temperature difference of 300 °C [5,6], and therefore the evaluation setups were built based on these temperature characteristics.
Along the way, the operating temperature gradient range of the modules increased and the measuring systems were upgraded to meet the new TEG specifications [2,3,4]. More recently, electrical heaters with higher thermal power capabilities were integrated in the test rigs. Hejtmanek et al. [7] constructed a setup that contains a 650 W heater that can reach a 450 °C at the hot side of the TEG. They presented the setup capabilities of the test stand by characterizing a HZ-20 commercially TEG at a constant power of 500 W in the heater and variable temperature on the cold side. Monteccuco et al. [3] built a test rig that allows the hot temperature on the module to reach 800 °C. However, the functionality of the setup was shown on a Bi2Te3 40 × 40 mm2 module (GM250-127-14-10) up to 200 °C.
The test stand described in this work has an integrated 1 kW electric heater that can reach up to 1000 °C. To fully explore the high temperature range, a commercial calcium-manganese oxide module was chosen for testing. To avoid damage to the TEG leads, the temperature in the heater was limited to 800 °C. The purpose of this paper is to study the transient behavior of the TEG electrical and thermal parameters. The outcome of this research is to show the temperature behavior through plots and provide data on the duration of the temperature transient for the oxide module. A standard system to characterize TEGs is not available yet, therefore the focus of the paper is limited to the commercial system called TEGeta (PANCO GmbH, Muelheim-Kaerlich, Germany) and other systems that are built with similar features.

2. Description of the Experimental Setup

The test system used to analyze the module performance is called TEGeta and it is shown in Figure 1. The system can only perform characterization on one TEG at a time. The block diagram for the experimental system in Figure 2 is an aid to explain the structure of the system and how it operates.
Figure 1. TEGeta experimental setup.
Figure 1. TEGeta experimental setup.
Energies 08 12341 g001
Figure 2. TEGeta block diagram.
Figure 2. TEGeta block diagram.
Energies 08 12341 g002
Experimental tests were performed on a commercial 42 × 42 mm2 calcium-manganese oxide module (CMO-25-42S, TECTEG (Aurora, ON, Canada) with 25 couples. One reference block (40 × 40 × 20 mm3) is placed on both sides of the TEG module. The material used for the reference blocks is the AN1/Alloy 800 (H/HT)/1.4876 from Valbruna Edel Inox GmbH (Dormagen, Germany). In each reference block, four thermocouples were inserted at a depth of 10 mm in holes of 1 mm in diameter at the distances presented in Figure 3 (T2 to T5 for hot side and T6 to T9 for cold side). Thermocouple (T1) provides the temperature measurements of the electrical heater which was placed on top of the hot side reference block and T10 shows the readings in the heat sink placed below the cold side reference block (Figure 2). The temperature of the heater (Tref) can be manually set at a desired value up to 1000 °C. The control of the heater temperature was made using feedback readings from T1. As shown in Figure 3, T1 was considered the reference and it was placed at “position 0”.
Figure 3. Placement of the thermocouples (T2-T9) in the reference blocks.
Figure 3. Placement of the thermocouples (T2-T9) in the reference blocks.
Energies 08 12341 g003
The hot and the cold temperatures at the surface of the module can be extrapolated from the slope of T2 to T5 and T6 to T9, respectively. Figure 4 shows how the TEG hot side temperature (Th) can be extrapolated in steady-state for three cases of the reference temperature (400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C).
Figure 4. Temperature readings from thermocouple T1 to T5 and extrapolation of the CMO-25-42S hot surface (Th) for input temperature references of 400 °C, 600 °C and 800 °C.
Figure 4. Temperature readings from thermocouple T1 to T5 and extrapolation of the CMO-25-42S hot surface (Th) for input temperature references of 400 °C, 600 °C and 800 °C.
Energies 08 12341 g004
All the described parts are sandwiched together between two plates at a desired pressure. Custom Thermoelectric recommends a pressure of 1.275 MPa per module for optimum power generation and thermal contact. Tests on the oxide module were performed at 1.3 MPa pressure. The upper temperature for the silver leads of the module is 900 °C. To avoid damaging the module, the maximum temperature limit in the heater was limited to 800 °C for all tests.
A 127 µm thick graphite sheet was used between the hot side of the TEG and the hot reference block. A gel pad with thermal conductivity of 8 W/mK provided by the CMO module manufacturer was placed between the cold surface of the TEG and the cold reference block. Both the graphite sheet and the gel pad were used to reduce the thermal contact resistance between the module and the two reference blocks. Vermiculite blocks were placed around the module and reference blocks to decrease the radiation heat loss.
The parameters that can be manually set and adjusted in the setup are:
  • The temperature reference for the heater (from ambient temperature up to 1000 °C)
  • The time between measurements (during this time, the setup performs no operation)
  • The time after target temperature is reached (during this time, the setup performs no operation)
  • Load values (limited to a combination between 0.22–8.13 Ω)
  • Number of measurements for each load value
TEGeta outputs the following measurement parameters: temperature readings for 10 thermocouples (T1 to T10), absolute time for each measurement performed, module/load voltage and current.

3. Experimental Results

Experimental tests are performed on a commercially available 42 × 42 mm2 CMO-25-42S module. To investigate the influence of the contact pressure, tests were performed at three different temperature references for the heater (400 °C, 600 °C, 800 °C), at two different pressures (1.3 MPa and 0.5 MPa). The lower pressure value was recommended by the TEGeta supplier. The I-V and P-V steady-state characteristics of the module at both pressure values are depicted in Figure 5 and the parameter values can be found in Table 1.
Figure 5. I-V and P-V characteristics for CMO-25-42S. The module was tested at heater temperatures Tref = 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C, at two different pressure values, 0.5 MPa (solid line) and 1.3 MPa (dash-dot line).
Figure 5. I-V and P-V characteristics for CMO-25-42S. The module was tested at heater temperatures Tref = 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C, at two different pressure values, 0.5 MPa (solid line) and 1.3 MPa (dash-dot line).
Energies 08 12341 g005
Table 1. Parameter characterization (VOC—open-circuit voltage, ISC—short-circuit current, RTEG—TEG resistance, Th—temperature at TEG hot surface, Tc—temperature at TEG hot surface) at different temperature references for the heater (400 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C and 800 °C), each for the two pressure values (0.5 MPa and 1.3 MPa).
Table 1. Parameter characterization (VOC—open-circuit voltage, ISC—short-circuit current, RTEG—TEG resistance, Th—temperature at TEG hot surface, Tc—temperature at TEG hot surface) at different temperature references for the heater (400 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C and 800 °C), each for the two pressure values (0.5 MPa and 1.3 MPa).
Tref (°C)P (MPa)VOC (V)ISC (A)RTEG (Ω)Th (°C)Tc (°C)
4000.51.21430.93711.295829396.5
1.31.28851.02421.258030498.5
5000.51.59621.20521.3244369117
1.31.68221.30081.2932381119
6000.52.00611.48101.3546449139
1.32.10131.58911.3223460141
7000.52.44441.76671.3836531162
1.32.54831.87501.3591541162
8000.52.91072.06241.4113617185
1.33.02552.17611.3903626186
The settings for the heater temperature (Tref) consists of a start-up value (Tref,start), end value (Tref,end), and the step in temperature (Tref,step) desired between the start and end values. For all the experimental results presented in this article, the start-up temperature value was 400 °C and the end temperature was 800 °C.
The TEGeta first performed all the measurements for the selected start-up temperature (400 °C), it increased the temperature in the heater, depending on the temperature step setting, and it performed all the measurements again until it reached 800 °C and stopped the process. An example is shown in Figure 6, where the temperature readings from thermocouples T1 to T5 are plotted for a temperature step of Tref,step = 100 °C. The temperature value changes from the heater to the hot side of the module due to the thermal properties of the material used for the reference block.
Figure 6. Temperature readings in thermocouples T1-T5 for a start-up temperature (Tref,start) in the heater of 400°C, Tref,step = 100 °C step and end temperature (Tref,end) of 800 °C.
Figure 6. Temperature readings in thermocouples T1-T5 for a start-up temperature (Tref,start) in the heater of 400°C, Tref,step = 100 °C step and end temperature (Tref,end) of 800 °C.
Energies 08 12341 g006
To acquire the transient parametric characterization of the module, a fixed load resistor of 1.33 Ω was used. All measurements were recorded every 5 s and the total time was set for 800 s per Tref setting.
Using this setup, both surface temperatures as well as electrical parameter transients could be achieved. The rate of change of the hot side temperature is higher than the one on the cold side. However, as seen from Figure 7a,b, the output power transient of the TEG is proportional to the rate of change of the temperature difference across the module. Therefore, the transitory period can be calculated using either the temperature gradient or power versus time curves. To reach more accurate steady-state results, the temperature difference curves were considered as reference for calculations.
Figure 7. Power and temperature difference transient response at with Tref,step = 50 °C at (a) Tref_end = 400 °C; and (b) Tref_end = 800 °C.
Figure 7. Power and temperature difference transient response at with Tref,step = 50 °C at (a) Tref_end = 400 °C; and (b) Tref_end = 800 °C.
Energies 08 12341 g007aEnergies 08 12341 g007b
Taking into account the theory of first order system response at unit step, the steady-state was calculated accordingly [8]. The steady-state value is reached when the signal reaches 98% of its final value. The transient time results for the heater reference temperatures (Tref,end) of 400 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C with steps (Tref,step) of 50 °C and 100 °C can be found in Table 2. Figure 8a,b present the plots for Tref,end of 400 °C and 800 °C as well as the point when the steady-state was reached for both Tref,step cases.
Figure 8. Hot-side temperature response (T5) of CMO-25-42S with Tref,step= 50 °C, and 100 °C, at (a) Tref_end = 400 °C; and (b) Tref_end = 800 °C.
Figure 8. Hot-side temperature response (T5) of CMO-25-42S with Tref,step= 50 °C, and 100 °C, at (a) Tref_end = 400 °C; and (b) Tref_end = 800 °C.
Energies 08 12341 g008
Table 2. Transient time values for CMO-25-42S at the reference temperatures (Tref_end) of 400 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C with steps (Tref,step) of 50 °C and 100 °C.
Table 2. Transient time values for CMO-25-42S at the reference temperatures (Tref_end) of 400 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C with steps (Tref,step) of 50 °C and 100 °C.
Transitory Time(s)
Tstep = 50 °CTstep = 100 °C
Tref_end = 400 °C320380
Tref_end = 500 °C340400
Tref_end = 600 °C360420
Tref_end = 700 °C380440
Tref_end = 800 °C540780
From Figure 8 and Table 2 it can be seen that the transitory time becomes longer for higher reference step temperatures and as the temperature reference is increasing. Also, it can be noticed a tendency for the waiting time to increase proportionally with the Tref_end value. For this particular study it takes less than 440 s to reach 98% of the steady state value up to a heater temperature of 800 °C. One of the reasons that the transient at Tref_end = 800 °C is significantly higher than the rest of the results is because the heater started to malfunction due to the high convection and irradiation losses. A solution could be to perform further testing above 800 °C under vacuum to significantly reduce the heat losses. On the other hand, measurements performed under vacuum are not equivalent to real TEG application values and therefore vacuum testing was not considered in this paper.
The TEGeta supplier recommends a rough approximation range for the waiting time between “60–120 s for reasonable results”. Taking into consideration that the test setup requires 5 s per measurement to print the result, the recommended waiting times translate into 300–600 s. The paper offers more accurate waiting times for steady-state to be reached by both the thermal and electrical parameters of the module under test. In this way, the total time required to perform TEG characterization can be improved.

4. Conclusions

This paper investigates the transient and steady-state behavior of both the electrical and thermal parameters of the CMO-25-42S high temperature module. The TEG was experimentally characterized using a commercially available measuring system named TEGeta. The setup can only perform parameter characterization on one module at a time.
First, the module was investigated in steady-state at two different pressure values: one recommended by the test setup supplier and the other by Custom Thermoelectric. As expected, the results confirm that the higher pressure lead to an increased power output by the TEG.
Afterwards, the transient response of the oxide TEG was measured at different heater temperatures in the range of 400–800 °C to explore the high temperature capabilities of the test rig. The data show that when the temperature in the heater increases, there is a temperature transient regime with an approximate duration of 320 s up to 780 s, depending on the reference temperature step size. These values should be taken into consideration when measurements are performed, otherwise errors or mismatches can occur. In addition, by knowing the transitory time, the total characterization time of a TEG module can also be reduced.
Additionally, the paper reveals that the test system encounters difficulties to maintain the input temperature above 700 °C because of the high heat losses though convection and radiation. It is known that convection losses can be significantly reduced if tests are carried under vacuum conditions. The TEGeta can also accommodate these conditions; however the authors did not consider this case because measurements would not be compatible with the ones from real TEG applications.

Acknowledgments

This work is carried out within the OTE-Power project funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research, under the Programme Commission on Sustainable Energy and Environment (Contract No. 10-093971).

Author Contributions

Elena Anamaria Man worked on the experimental tests, data analysis, plotting the results and article writing. Erik Schaltz and Lasse Rosendahl provided valuable comments for the writing part and project supervision. Alireza Rezaniakoalei helped with the experimental testing and the structure of the article. Dieter Platzek assisted in the parameter measurement and data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rauscher, L.; Fujimoto, S.; Kaibe, H.T.; Sano, S. Efficiency determination and general characterization of thermoelectric generators using an absolute measurement of the heat flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anatychuk, L.I.; Havrylyuk, M.V. Procedure and equipment for measuring parameters of thermoelectric generator modules. J. Electron. Mater. 2011, 42, 1292–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Montecucco, A.; Buckle, J.; Siviter, J.; Knox, A.R. A new test rig for accurate nonparametric measurement and characterization of thermoelectric generators. J. Electron. Mater. 2014, 42, 1966–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. PANCO GmbH. In TEGeta—Measurement of Efficiency and Specifications of Thermoelectric Power Generators; Manual; Panco GmbH: Muelheim-Kaerlich, Germany, 2013.
  5. Takazawa, H.; Obara, H.; Okada, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Onishi, T.; Kajikawa, T. Efficiency measurement of thermoelectric modules operating in the temperature difference of up to 550K. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2006 ICT '06, Vienna, Austria, 6–10 August 2006; pp. 189–192.
  6. Sandoz-Rosado, E.; Stevens, R.J. Experimental characterization of thermoelectric modules and comparison with theoretical models for power generation. J. Electron. Mater. 2009, 38, 1239–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hejtmanek, J.; Kniz, K.; Svejda, V.; Horna, P.; Sikora, M. Test system for thermoelectric modules and materials. J. Electron. Mater. 2014, 43, 3726–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bazoune, A. Chapter 8—Time-domain analysis of dynamic systems. Available online: http://opencourseware.kfupm.edu.sa/colleges/ces/me/me413/files%5C2-Chapters_Chapter_8__Time-Domain_Analysis_of_Dynamic_Systems.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2015).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Man, E.A.; Schaltz, E.; Rosendahl, L.; Rezaniakolaei, A.; Platzek, D. A High Temperature Experimental Characterization Procedure for Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Generator Modules under Transient Conditions. Energies 2015, 8, 12839-12847. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112341

AMA Style

Man EA, Schaltz E, Rosendahl L, Rezaniakolaei A, Platzek D. A High Temperature Experimental Characterization Procedure for Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Generator Modules under Transient Conditions. Energies. 2015; 8(11):12839-12847. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Man, Elena Anamaria, Erik Schaltz, Lasse Rosendahl, Alireza Rezaniakolaei, and Dieter Platzek. 2015. "A High Temperature Experimental Characterization Procedure for Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Generator Modules under Transient Conditions" Energies 8, no. 11: 12839-12847. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112341

APA Style

Man, E. A., Schaltz, E., Rosendahl, L., Rezaniakolaei, A., & Platzek, D. (2015). A High Temperature Experimental Characterization Procedure for Oxide-Based Thermoelectric Generator Modules under Transient Conditions. Energies, 8(11), 12839-12847. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112341

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop