Author Contributions
Conceptualization, funding acquisition supervision, methodology, resources, review and editing, Y.Z.; investigation, software, visualization, and original draft, H.W.; editing and improving, W.Y.
Figure 1.
The general workflow of this research. Step 1, prepare drones including battery check and flight permission; Step 2, make flight mission plan, including covering area, overlap rate and shooting interval; Step 3, import images into Agisoft; Step 4, align images and generate sparse pointcloud; Step 5, generate dense point cloud based on sparse point cloud (PC); Step 6, crop PC to get anticipated research area PC; Step 7, extract the PC using excess green (ExG) index, then fit noise points using statistical filter; Step 8, reconstruct the surface using Delaunay traigulation; Step 9, calculate the surface area of forest canopy; and Step 10, carry out the time series analysis.
Figure 1.
The general workflow of this research. Step 1, prepare drones including battery check and flight permission; Step 2, make flight mission plan, including covering area, overlap rate and shooting interval; Step 3, import images into Agisoft; Step 4, align images and generate sparse pointcloud; Step 5, generate dense point cloud based on sparse point cloud (PC); Step 6, crop PC to get anticipated research area PC; Step 7, extract the PC using excess green (ExG) index, then fit noise points using statistical filter; Step 8, reconstruct the surface using Delaunay traigulation; Step 9, calculate the surface area of forest canopy; and Step 10, carry out the time series analysis.
Figure 2.
Result of green vegetation discrimination by ExG index: (a) 3D point cloud model of the study area before extraction by ExG index and (b) 3D point cloud model of the study area after extraction by ExG index. Non-green points have been deleted from the 3D model.
Figure 2.
Result of green vegetation discrimination by ExG index: (a) 3D point cloud model of the study area before extraction by ExG index and (b) 3D point cloud model of the study area after extraction by ExG index. Non-green points have been deleted from the 3D model.
Figure 3.
The 3D point cloud model in which near-ground points had been separated
Figure 3.
The 3D point cloud model in which near-ground points had been separated
Figure 4.
The 3D point cloud model after surface reconstruction by the Delauney triangulation algorithm.
Figure 4.
The 3D point cloud model after surface reconstruction by the Delauney triangulation algorithm.
Figure 5.
(a) The orthophoto map of the study area on 4 April 2019, generated by Agisoft Photoscan, (b) 3D point cloud model on 4 April 2019 after extraction by ExG index and separation from near-ground points, (c) point cloud model of the canopy in XY plane projected from 3D space, and (d) point cloud model of the canopy after surface reconstruction.
Figure 5.
(a) The orthophoto map of the study area on 4 April 2019, generated by Agisoft Photoscan, (b) 3D point cloud model on 4 April 2019 after extraction by ExG index and separation from near-ground points, (c) point cloud model of the canopy in XY plane projected from 3D space, and (d) point cloud model of the canopy after surface reconstruction.
Figure 6.
A comparison of the point cloud before and after being filtered by SOR filter. (a) Point cloud before filtering, (b) point cloud after filtering by SOR filter. The number of adjacent points was set to 50 and the standard deviation was set to 1.0.
Figure 6.
A comparison of the point cloud before and after being filtered by SOR filter. (a) Point cloud before filtering, (b) point cloud after filtering by SOR filter. The number of adjacent points was set to 50 and the standard deviation was set to 1.0.
Figure 7.
A comparison of the point cloud with or without the influence of sunlight. (a) Point cloud on 12 April 2019 and (b) point cloud on 14 April 2019, which was strongly affected by sunlight.
Figure 7.
A comparison of the point cloud with or without the influence of sunlight. (a) Point cloud on 12 April 2019 and (b) point cloud on 14 April 2019, which was strongly affected by sunlight.
Figure 8.
The graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area in the whole study area from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Figure 8.
The graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area in the whole study area from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Figure 9.
The comparison of the point cloud models of sakura trees in the selected area on 2 April (a), 8 April (b), 17 April (c), and 25 April 2019 (d). The point cloud models had been extracted by ExG index.
Figure 9.
The comparison of the point cloud models of sakura trees in the selected area on 2 April (a), 8 April (b), 17 April (c), and 25 April 2019 (d). The point cloud models had been extracted by ExG index.
Figure 10.
The graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area in the sakura region from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Figure 10.
The graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area in the sakura region from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Figure 11.
The 3D point cloud model of the single plant on 2 April (a) and 25 April 2019 (b).
Figure 11.
The 3D point cloud model of the single plant on 2 April (a) and 25 April 2019 (b).
Figure 12.
Graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area of the single plant from 2 April to 1 May 2019
Figure 12.
Graph of logistic fitting of the canopy area of the single plant from 2 April to 1 May 2019
Figure 13.
Results of the validation assessment comparing canopy coverage and canopy area.
Figure 13.
Results of the validation assessment comparing canopy coverage and canopy area.
Table 1.
The changes of canopy area in the whole study area from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Table 1.
The changes of canopy area in the whole study area from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Date | Weather | Area of Canopy (m2) |
---|
2 April | Cloudy | 12,313.6 |
4 April | Cloudy | 12,378.7 |
8 April | Cloudy | 13,427.1 |
10 April | Cloudy | 15,378.1 |
12 April | Cloudy | 19,950.2 |
14 April | Sunny | 17,892.8 |
17 April | Sunny | 18,093.2 |
25 April | Cloudy | 21,551.6 |
1 May | Cloudy | 22,729.8 |
Table 2.
Summary of the results of logistic fitting.
Table 2.
Summary of the results of logistic fitting.
A1 | A2 | x0 | p | Statistic |
---|
Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | R-Square |
11,801.4757 | 1245.7478 | 22,349.9235 | 1815.9597 | 11.9122 | 1.9353 | 3.4217 | 1.8106 | 0.8517 |
Table 3.
The changes of canopy area and weather in the sakura region from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Table 3.
The changes of canopy area and weather in the sakura region from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Date | Weather | Area of Canopy (m2) |
---|
2 April | Cloudy | 2451.25 |
4 April | Cloudy | 2821.56 |
7 April | Partly cloudy | 2979.02 |
8 April | Cloudy | 3504.23 |
10 April | Cloudy | 3756.96 |
12 April | Cloudy | 3958.88 |
14 April | Sunny | 3960.76 |
17 April | Sunny | 4246.25 |
25 April | Cloudy | 4520.48 |
1 May | Cloudy | 4766.18 |
Table 4.
The summary of the results of logistic fitting of the sakura region.
Table 4.
The summary of the results of logistic fitting of the sakura region.
A1 | A2 | x0 | p | Statistic |
---|
Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | R-Square |
2333.9309 | 250.7705 | 5021.4925 | 389.2948 | 10.2019 | 1.5536 | 1.8216 | 0.6460 | 0.9652 |
Table 5.
Changes of the canopy area and weather situation of the single plant from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Table 5.
Changes of the canopy area and weather situation of the single plant from 2 April to 1 May 2019.
Date | Weather | Area of Canopy (m2) |
---|
2 April | Cloudy | 0 |
4 April | Cloudy | 1.0372 |
7 April | Partly cloudy | 29.2246 |
8 April | Cloudy | 52.4488 |
10 April | Cloudy | 76.0798 |
12 April | Cloudy | 80.1419 |
14 April | Sunny | 70.5397 |
17 April | Sunny | 65.4373 |
25 April | Cloudy | 80.7242 |
1 May | Cloudy | 83.4578 |
Table 6.
Summary of the results of logistic fitting of the sakura region.
Table 6.
Summary of the results of logistic fitting of the sakura region.
A1 | A2 | x0 | p | Statistic |
---|
Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | Value | Error | R-Square |
0.55938 | 4.5873 | 76.5119 | 2.8449 | 7.3736 | 0.2223 | 10.5161 | 3.8486 | 0.9606 |
Table 7.
Summary of the results including the area of the canopy, the area of coverage, and the canopy coverage.
Table 7.
Summary of the results including the area of the canopy, the area of coverage, and the canopy coverage.
Date | Weather | Area of Canopy (m2) | Area of Coverage (m2) | Canopy Coverage (m2) |
---|
2 April | Cloudy | 12,313.6 | 4470.00 | 0.2591 |
4 April | Cloudy | 12,378.7 | 4613.04 | 0.2674 |
7 April | Sunny | 10,505.6 | 4567.33 | 0.2647 |
8 April | Partly cloud | 13,427.1 | 5466.19 | 0.3169 |
10 April | Cloudy | 15,378.1 | 5926.82 | 0.3435 |
12 April | Cloudy | 19,950.2 | 7278.39 | 0.4219 |
14 April | Sunny | 17,892.8 | 6344.71 | 0.3678 |
17 April | Sunny | 18,093.2 | 6647.87 | 0.3854 |
25 April | Cloudy | 21,551.6 | 7827.72 | 0.4537 |
1 May | Cloudy | 22,729.8 | 8208.43 | 0.4759 |