Next Article in Journal
Identification the Pathogens Causing Rot Disease in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in China and the Antifungal Activity of Aqueous Garlic Extract
Previous Article in Journal
Object-Based Tree Species Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Images and LiDAR Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana

1
Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2020, 11(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033
Submission received: 6 December 2019 / Revised: 18 December 2019 / Accepted: 23 December 2019 / Published: 24 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecophysiology and Biology)

Abstract

:
Liriodendron chinense is a common ornamental tree that has attractive leaves, which is a valuable trait for use in landscape architecture. In this work, we aimed to identify the potential genes that control and regulate the development of L. chinense leaf lobes. Based on the transcriptome data for the leaf developmental stages we previously generated, two candidate genes were identified in this study. KNOTTED-LIKE HOMEOBOX(KNOX), encoding homeobox family proteins, play a large role in leaf lobe and leaf complexity regulation. Here, two full length KNOX genes from L. chinense were amplified and named LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 according to their sequence similarities with the respective Arabidopsis thaliana KNOX family genes. Overexpression vectors were constructed and subsequently transformed into wild type (WT) A. thaliana. Additionally, LcKNOX6 was expressed in tobacco leaves to examine its subcellular localization, and the 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic A. thaliana leaf cells were imaged with the use of SEM. The expression of several genes that participate in KNOX gene regulation were validated by quantitative real-time PCR. The results show that LcKNOX1 produces almost the same phenotype as that found in WT A. thaliana. Notably, the LcKNOX6-1 lines presented deep leaf lobes that were similar to L. chinense leaf lobes. Two 35S::LcKNOX6 lines induced an abnormal growth phenotype whose seeds were abortive. In short, these results indicate that the LcKNOX6 gene might affect leaf development in A. thaliana and provide insights into the regulation of L. chinense leaf shaping.

1. Introduction

Leaves present tremendous diversity due to their adaption to variable environments, and they play an essential role in plant photosynthesis and transpiration. Since photosynthesis in leaves is vital to plant growth and survival, variations in leaf shape may reflect natural selection according to function [1]. For instance, the decreased hydraulic resistance in deeply lobed leaves may serve as a mechanism for promoting water balance under drought conditions [2]. Leaf shape diversity is usually determined by alterations of the margin [3]. Recently, a report indicated that leaf shape might be an important but overlooked factor that affects the interactions between plants and leaf-processing herbivores [4]. Over the years, leaf shape has been examined in studies of the relationship between the environment and variation, as well as in studies of the evolution of species of angiosperms [3,5,6].
Liriodendron chinense is an ornamental tree that is used in the Chinese landscapes thanks to its straight stem, graceful crown, and attractive leaf shape, which prominently resembles an imperial robe from the Qing Dynasty. Hence, it has the local name Robe Tree in the southeastern region of China. The Liriodendron genus is an old lineage that includes two distinct species from the Tertiary period: L. chinense, an endangered species in Southern China and Northern Vietnam, and L. tulipifera, a dominant species in Eastern North America [7]. Among the species in the genus, the leaves’ morphologies exhibit slight variation in the depth of the lobes and the numbers of serrations below the two lobes. However, the most common leaf trait is the presence of two lobes that create the valuable feature that resembles a robe. Consequently, we examined the crucial genes that are involved in leaf lobe development in L. chinense.
The morphology of a leaf can be simple, such as that of A. thaliana, or be dissected, which is sometimes called compound found in species such as Cardamine hirsute, a relative of A. thaliana [5,8]. Regardless of their final shape, leaves initiate from a highly active dome called the shoot apical meristem (SAM), which is the central part involved in plant organogenesis. In the SAM, many regulators are involved in SAM maintenance and organ development [9,10]. Among these regulators, the KNOX family genes, which encode the three amino acid loop extension (TALE) homeodomain proteins, play vital roles in leaf developmental regulation [11,12]. The first KNOX gene was examined in maize in the foci of cells along the lateral veins that form knots and was characterized as part of the TALE homeobox superfamily [13,14,15]. KNOX genes can be divided into three subfamilies: class I, II and III. In A. thaliana, the KNOX class I family includes SHOOT MERISTEMLESS(STM), KNAT1(KNOTTED-LIKE HOMEOBOX from Arabidopsis thaliana1)/BREVIPEDICELLUS(BP), KNAT2 and KNAT6, all of which are pivotal in the regulation of the SAM; the KNOX II family includes KNAT3 and KNAT7; the KNOX class III family includes other KNOXs called KNOXM [16,17]. Class I KNOX genes can regulate leaf complexity in angiosperms, are expressed in the SAM, and are essential for SAM maintenance [18]. In plants with simple leaves, the class I KNOX genes are exclusively expressed in the meristem and stem, but some of them are shut down in leaf primordia [19]. In dissected leaves, they are expressed in leaf primordia [20]. KNOX proteins can maintain the key pluripotent cell population, which generates the entire aboveground body of vascular plants [19]. They generally regulate several target genes that mediate hormonal homeostasis in the meristem and interact with another subclass of homeodomain proteins. Generally, the KNOX proteins include three domains: The N-terminal MEINOX domain, the HD domain at the C-terminus and the ELK domain followed by the HD domain. The MEINOX region comprises two domains: KNOX1 and KNOX2. A study reported that the KNOX1 domain plays a role in its target gene suppression, and the KNOX2 domain is thought to be indispensable for homodimerization [21]. In fact, the KNOX proteins can cooperate with other regulators through the homeodomain, which is a conserved domain of the homeobox family and is typically composed of three α-helices that are connected by two loops that are approximately 60 amino acids long.
Even though the first plant homeobox gene was cloned from maize over 20 years ago, only recently have studies focused on KNOX gene function in diverse developmental processes, as well as KNOX functions have been found to contribute to developmental transitions during land plant evolution [19]. Though some studies have identified genes regulated by KNOX, further research in many species is needed. The transcriptome data for different stages leaves development in L. chinense have been examined [22]. In a previous work, a few candidate genes that participate in leaf shape development, including the KNOX genes, were selected from the differential expressed genes. In this work, the two most differentially expressed candidate genes were selected, and we examined these two key genes, which are members of the most important transcription factor family of genes that determine leaf morphology [23,24,25,26,27]. Though several studies have focused on the regulation by KNOX family genes in several species, they have not yet been examined in L. chinense. Ectopic KNAT1 expression in A. thaliana was found to result in a transition from simple to lobed leaves [28]. Additionally, overexpression of KNAT6 was found to induce the lobed leaves in A. thaliana [27]. Following to these studies, we aimed to examine whether LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 have the function to produce leaf lobe growth. Additionally, the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 genes are the most likely candidate genes due to their significantly differential expressions that were found during L. chinense leaf development in our previous work. Hence, the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 genes were isolated from L. chinense as the putative key factors involved in leaf lobe development. Next, we overexpressed these two KNOX genes in wild type (WT) A. thaliana (Col-0). Detailed information on the conserved domain features, expression patterns and subcellular localizations of the two genes are reported here. Consequently, we obtained three different phenotypes from 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic seedlings whose leaves presented several lobes. Notably, the 35S::LcKNOX6-1 line’s leaf shape with two apparent lobes bore resemblance to the L. chinense leaf shape. These results indicated that LcKNOX6 gave rise to leaf lobes and complexity in A. thaliana. This finding may provide insights into L. chinense leaf formation and contribute to a better understanding the critical regulators involved in leaf development.

2. Method

2.1. Materials and Plant Growth Conditions and Homozygote Screening

L. chinense trees were planted in a provenance trial plantation in the Xiashu forest nursery, which is located in Jurong County, Jiangsu Province, China (119°13′20″ E, 32°7′8″ N), in 1993. In June 2018, we sampled the tender leaves and buds of the sample trees whose provenances originated from Wuyi Mountain, Fujian Province, China.
The ecotype of A. thaliana that was used in transgenic assay was the wild type Col-0. Prior to sowing, seeds were sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 s, flushed three times with distilled water for 20 s, soaked in bleach (10%) for 15 min, and washed five times with distilled water for 30 s. The putative transgenic seeds were dipped on solidified 1/2 MS (Murashige Skoog) medium with 0.8% (w/v) agar, 30 mM kanamycin and 1% (w/v) sucrose; the pH was adjusted to 5.7. Then, they were vernalized in a 4 °C refrigerator, left in darkness for 2 d, and nursed in a Sanyo MLR-350 chamber (Sanyo Electric Co., Osaka, Japan) under long day conditions (illumination at 23 °C for 16 h and darkness at 16 °C for 8 h). Once the seeds germinated two cotyledons, we transferred the seedlings into pots with a 1:1:1 mixture of soil, vermiculite and sand. Subsequent molecular detection was achieved via specific primer amplification, and several positive plants were generated. The seedlings of the T3 generation were subjected to transgene expression analysis.

2.2. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

The total RNA was isolated from L. chinense leaves and bud tissues and A. thaliana leaves tissues by using a DP441-RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm, and its integrity was checked through denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, the cDNA (complementary DNA) was synthesized from 500 ng of the total RNA by using the TransScript All in One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for PCR (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol in 20 µL of total volume.

2.3. 5′ and 3′ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends and Sequence Analysis

To identify the candidate gene sequences that encode KNOX proteins in L. chinense, their unigenes were selected from the DEGs (differentially expressed genes) in L. chinense leaves at different stages in a transcriptome database [22]. Then, the 3′ and 5′ RACE (rapid-amplification of cDNA ends) primers were designed according to the transcriptomic annotated KNOX1 and KNOX6 sequences, respectively. The RACE reaction was conducted with the use of a SMARTer® RACE 5′/3′Kit (Takara Biomedical Technology, Dalian, China). The open reading frame (ORF) of the two LcKNOX genes was generated and ligated into pEASY-Blunt cloning vectors by using a pEASY-Blunt Zero Cloning Kit (Transgen biotech, Beijing, China). Next, the vectors were transformed into Trans1-T1 Phage Resistant Chemically Competent Cells (Transgen biotech, Beijing, China). The plasmid DNA was isolated from the positive Escherichia coli cells and sequenced by Genscript Biotech Corp (Genscript, Nanjing, China).
The ORFs were predicted by the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) ORF Finder(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) and verified by sequencing (Genscript, Nanjing, China). The alignment was analyzed with the DNAMAN software (Lynnon Biosoft, QC, Canada) and compared to the A. thaliana KNOX genes online (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp). All the primers used for PCR are listed in Table S1.

2.4. Recombinant Plasmid Construction and Plant Transformation

To generate the plant transformation constructs, the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 coding regions (without a stop codon) were amplified and ligated into a modified pBI121 vector downstream of the 35S CaMV (Cauliflower mosaic virus) promoter via the XbaI and BamHI sites by using QuickCut enzymes (Takara Biomedical Technology, Dalian, China) and the ClonExpress® Ultra One Step Cloning Kit, respectively. We introduced the recombinant plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (GV3101) and used the floral dipping approach to transform the plasmids into A. thaliana (Col-0).
Since the lobed phenotype on which we focused occurs in 35S::LcKNOX6 seedlings, the sequence coding LcKNOX6 was introduced into the binary pCAMBIA 1302 vector. The pCAMBIA1302 vector was digested by the XbaI and BamHI sites by using QuickCut enzymes (Takara Biomedical Technology, Dalian, China). Then, the LcKNOX6 ORF sequence was inserted into the digested pCAMBIA1302 vector. The LcKNOX6::GFP fusion construct was transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101, which was injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves separately. A green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence signal was observed 2 days after infiltration by using an LSM 710 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) [29]. After multigeneration inbreeding and screening, the T3 generation of 35S::LcKNOX6-2 transgenic A. thaliana was recruited for further assays.

2.5. SEM Observation and Subcellular Localization Analysis

We sampled the third leaves of 35S::LcKNOX6-2 and WT A. thaliana (six week old) in an SEM assay. The 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic seedlings and WT leaves were rinsed in a formalin acetic-acid alcohol (FAA) fixation solution composed of 38% formalin, glacial acetic acid, and 50% ethanol overnight at 4 °C. Next, all the samples were fixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h. Then, the samples were dried with an EMITECH K850 critical point dryer (Emitech, Ashford, UK). Next, they were coated with an Edwards E-1010 ion sputter golden coater (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The leaves and siliqua epidermis of WT and 35S::LcKNOX6-2 were observed using an FEI Quanta 200 FEG MKII scanning electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) under a suitable pressure (1.94 × 10−3 Pa) at 10–20 KV of high voltage (HV). To investigate the subcellular localization of LcKNOX6, the GFP fluorescence signal in tobacco leaves was observed 2 days after infiltration with the use of an LSM 710 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR of Gene Expression

As previously reported, we selected a few genes related to leaf shape formation that are regulated by KNOX family genes in A. thaliana. We designed their primers to verify their expression in 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic seedlings (Table S1). Since we barely harvested any 35S::LcKNOX6-1 seeds and few 35S::LcKNOX6-3 seeds were obtained due to the severely weak growth of these two lines, the third leaves of 35S::LcKNOX6-2 and WT A. thaliana (six week old) were sampled to isolate the total RNA. Then, the total RNA was diluted to 500 ng and reverse transcribed by using a 5× PrimeScript RT Master Mix for Real Time (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) in a 20 μL of reaction protocol including 2 μL of cDNA (diluted five times), 10 μL of SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2×), 0.8 μL of each specific primer (10 mM), 0.4 μL of ROX Reference Dye II (50×), and 6.8 μL of double distilled H2O (ddH2O) (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). All designed primers were 18–25 bp and generated PCR produces 80–250 bp in size; the temperature of melting (Tm) ranged from 58 to 60 °C. The primers are listed in Table S1. The reference housekeeping gene Actin97(ACT97) of L. chinense was used for normalization [30]. The PCR conditions were as follows: 60 s at 95 °C for the initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 60 s at 60 °C, 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C for annealing [31]. The standard deviations (SD) were calculated by triplicates.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of KNOX Genes

The genes were cloned from L. chinense buds and mixed leaves samples because previous reports claimed that some class I KNOX genes are only expressed in the SAM and that their expression might be non-existent in leaf primordia. Based on the transcriptome results of gene expression from different leaf development phases, the expression of LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 is significantly different during leaf development. Thus, we selected these two KNOX genes for further study in the relation to leaf lobes and development. Constructs corresponding to the two full-length LcKNOX genes were generated for overexpression under the 35S promoter in A. thaliana (Col-0). Consequently, the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 protein sequences were aligned to that of the A. thaliana class I KNOX protein family, which has been shown to regulate A. thaliana leaf development. The results showed that the two LcKNOX genes were similar to KNAT1 and KNAT6, so we named them LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6, respectively. LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 are comprised of three conserved domains: a MEINOX domain, including two domains at the N-terminus called KNOX1 and KNOX2; an ELK domain; and a homeodomain at the C-terminal, which is vital for combination with itself or other regulatory functional domains according to previous studies (Figure 1).
The full length of the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 genes were found to 1394 and 1258 bp, respectively. The open reading frame of LcKNOX1 was 1110 bp, and this frame was found to encode 370 amino acids with a molecular mass of 41.5 kDa. The hydrophilicity was calculated as −0.755, with an instability coefficient of 47.52, indicating that the LcKNOX1 protein was likely to be a stable and hydrophobic protein. The LcKNOX6 ORF was 948 bp, it encoded 316 amino acids, and the molecular weight of the protein was found to be 50.15 kDa (Table 1).

3.2. Phenotype of Transgenic A. thaliana

LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6, both of which encode homeobox family protein sequences, were introduced into the binary pBI121 vector downstream of the 35S CaMV promoter. The overexpression of LcKNOX1, whose sequence is similar to that of the KNAT1 gene in A. thaliana, did not result in any significant phenotypic changes compared to the WT A. thaliana (Figure 2a,b). The 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic plants could be divided according to three observed phenotypes that corresponded to different lines. Notably, one of the 35S::LcKNOX6 phenotypes displayed by the 35S::LcKNOX6-1 line was characterized by lobed leaves (Figure 2c,f,i) that were apparently similar to L. chinense leaves (Figure 2g), but the leaves of the transgenic 35S::LcKNOX6-1 phenotype were considerably smaller than the WT leaves (Figure 2b,c,f,i). The growth of this line was extremely weak, and the line did not produce many seeds. Two other phenotypes of 35S::LcKNOX6 were displayed by the lines 35S::LcKNOX6-2 and 35S: 35S::LcKNOX6-3. The 35S::LcKNOX6-2 leaves had a few extra lobes, and some leaves were observed to be dissected (Figure 2e). In the 35S::LcKNOX6-3 line, the individuals were abnormal, with weak and abortive growth (Figure 2d).

3.3. Transgenic Tissue SEM Imaging

To examine the leaf cell changes in the transgenic plants, we imaged the 35S::LcKNOX6 leaf margins, especially at the sinuses, which are known to contain ectopic stipules and meristems. At the sinus of the 35S::LcKNOX6 plant leaf, we imaged many stomata along the lobe. Generally, twenty stomata were found on imaged part of the 35S::LcKNOX6 leaf margin, but only four stomata were found on the imaged part of the WT leaf margin. (Figure 3a,b). The cells at the 35S::LcKNOX6 leaf lobe were smaller than the cells at the WT leaf margin. Moreover, the siliqua epidermis was examined, and the result showed that the siliqua epidermis cells in the 35S::LcKNOX6 phenotype were shorter and smaller than siliqua epidermis cells of the WT phenotype. The cells of 35S::LcKNOX6 siliqua epidermis were almost 35 μm long, but the length of WT siliqua epidermis cell was more than 50 μm. (Figure 3c,d).

3.4. Subcellular Localization and Analysis with a Reporter Gene for β-glucuronidase (GUS) Staining in Transgenic Seedlings

Before the subcellular localization assay, we used LOCALIZER (http://localizer.csiro.au/) and Gneg-PLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Gneg/#), two online tools, for the prediction of subcellular localization [32]. The predictions both showed that LcKNOX6 is a cytoplasmic protein. Then, a confocal microscope was used to analyze the subcellular localization of LcKNOX6 with a GFP vector in N. benthamiana leaves. The result indicated that the LcKNAT6::GFP fusion protein was localized to the plasma membrane, nucleus and the cytoderm of cells, which is consistent with some transcription factor patterns (Figure 4).

3.5. The Expression of Genes Related to KNOX in Transgenic A. thaliana

Based on the abnormal leaf phenotype in 35S::LcKNOX6 seedlings, we examined the regulation of the other genes by LcKNOX6 in A. thaliana. Thus, we selected KNAT1, KNAT2, KNAT6, AS2, PIN1 and GA20ox, six genes in A. thaliana, on the basis of reports showing that they are involved in KNOX regulation [20,26,28,33,34,35]. Then, their expressions in the WT and transgenic A. thaliana leaves were generated. We validated that KNAT1 expression was decreased, whereas the expression levels of KNAT2 and KNAT6 did not obviously change in transgenic A. thaliana compared to those in WT A. thaliana. We found that AS2 can cooperate with AS1 gene to repress KNOX gene expression. Likewise, the expression of AS2, an upstream regulator of KNOX genes, in transgenic seedlings presented a much lower expression level than the expression level in WT (Col-0). PIN1, which encodes an auxin efflux transporter protein, plays a critical role in leaf margin establishment. The decreased PIN1 expression may have been due to LcKNOX6 overexpression. GA20ox expression also decreased, which was consistent with the reports that KNOX proteins can bind the GA20ox gene promoter and repress its expression [36,37,38]. This result indicates that the LcKNOX6 protein may have a function that is related to the binding of the promoter of the GA20ox. KNAT1 was also found in A. thaliana, suggesting that LcKNOX6 participates in the regulation of KNAT1 (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Function of Domains in the LcKNOX Genes

Generally, KNAT1, KNAT2 and KNAT6 belong to class I KNOX family, which plays a crucial role in leaf morphology. The other classes KNOX families, e.g., the class II KNOX family, do not show a direct correlation with leaf shape, and they may have other functions in plant development. The sequences of the LcKNOX proteins were aligned to the A. thaliana KNOX family protein sequences. According to their similarity to the respective A. thaliana KNOX family genes, we named the two identified genes LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6. The two LcKNOX genes were both found to have the three typical domains of the KNOX family, including the MEINOX domain, the ELK domain, and the homeodomain. They correspond with the conserved structures of the class I KNOX genes found in other species [39,40]. Apparently, class I KNOX genes have a few different sequences that encode proteins from class II KNOX genes. Indeed, the N-terminal MEINOX domain is composed of KNOX1 and KNOX2 two subdomains, of which the KNOX1 subdomain participates in suppressing target gene expression, and the KNOX2 subdomain, which is essential for KNOX function, is thought to be necessary for homodimerization [15,21]. In addition, the C-terminal homeodomain (HD), which has three extra amino acids between helix1 and helix2, is a characteristic DNA-binding domain that is a conserved domain in the homeobox family and is typically composed of three α-helices that are connected by two loops that are approximately 60 amino acids long [11,41].

4.2. Roles of KNOX Genes During Lobed Leaf Formation

To investigate whether these two genes are involved in leaf development, we overexpressed LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 in A. thaliana. Overall, 35S::LcKNOX6 produced three phenotypes that were represented by three different lines. Firstly, the 35S::LcKNOX6-1 line exhibited two lobes on each side of the leaf that apparently resembled the leaf lobes of L. chinense. However, the growth the 35S::LcKNOX-1 line was extremely weak, and we obtained hardly any seeds. In a few leaves of the 35S::LcKNOX-2 line, which exhibited the most commonly observed phenotype for 35S::LcKNOX6, the number of lobes was induced. The third phenotype was severely abnormal, and the seedlings tended to be abortive. These results indicate that the LcKNOX6 gene might play a key role in leaf development and outgrowth in L. chinense. The overexpression of KNAT1, a homeobox gene of A. thaliana, and knl, a homeobox gene of maize, in A. thaliana resulted in a highly abnormal leaf morphology of obviously lobed leaves [20,28,42]. Before this work, 35S::LcKNOX6 plants were predicted to form lobed leaves and even leaflets. Therefore, the result is consistent with previous reports [28,43]. The overexpression of KNAT6 induces the lobed leaves phenotype in A. thaliana [27]. The overexpression of five rice homeobox (OSH) genes under the control of the 35S promoter resulted in almost all of the transgenic seedlings showing abnormal phenotypes [44]. In A. thaliana, the KNAT6 gene is expressed in the embryonic SAM and can contribute to STM maintenance, as well as SAM and organ separation [26]. However, the 35S::LcKNOX1 transgenic seedlings presented little phenotypic change in A. thaliana. The subcellular localization result indicates that the LcKNOX6 gene is localized in the plasma membrane, nucleus and the cytoderm of cells in tobacco leaves. This result was also consistent with most of the transcription factor subcellular localization patterns.

4.3. KNOX Gene Regulations

The KNOX genes, which serve as pleiotropy factors in plant development, could maintain SAM function by regulating the expression of other key genes. Due to the abnormal phenotypes in 35S::LcKNOX6 seedlings, and according to previous studies, a few genes that may be regulated by the KNOX gene were examined in 35S::LcKNOX6 leaves. The LcKNOX6-1 line was dead before the flowers bloomed, and the LcKNOX6-3 plants were seriously abortive such that we were unable to obtain enough T3 generation materials for further assays. Thus, only the 35S::LcKNOX1-2 line was used in the assays. Generally, the KNOX family genes affect leaf development by regulating several genes, such as AS1/AS2, CUC, GA20ox and PIN1 [45,46,47,48,49,50]. Additionally, the KNOX family gene structure contained the HD conserved domain which can combine with other genes [11,41]. Thus, we detected the expression of KNAT6 to exclude the interference of KNAT6. Therefore, we examined the expression of several genes by using the quantitative real-time PCR method. In fact, a few 35S::LcKNOX6 seedlings were prone to being abortive and dwarfed, which is similar to the behavior of the as2 mutant [51]. This might mean the LcKNOX6 gene plays a role in AS2 gene suppression. The suppression of AS2 in 35S::LcKNOX6 leaves has been validated. AS2 has been identified to participate in the regulation of KNOX genes by complexing of the AS2 gene and the AS1 gene to repress the KNOX gene expression [33]. PIN1 was also decreased in 35S::LcKNOX6 leaves. The ectopic expression of the KNOX gene in leaves was found to perturb local PIN1-dependent gradients of auxin activity, which leads to lobe or leaflet outgrowth in A. thaliana [52,53]. However, the decreased PIN expression in 35S::LcKNOX6 may have be due to the leaves that complete the regulation between KNOX and PIN. In our study, we generated a phenotype that was so abnormal that the resulting plant was dwarfed and abortive. Additionally, some KNOX genes have the ability to bind the promoter of the GA20ox gene, which is an indispensable biosynthesis enzyme that mediates gibberellin gradients. For instance, the NTH15 protein, which belongs to the KNOX protein family, binds to a 5 bp dyad symmetric sequence, GTGAC in the first intron of Ntc12, which encodes the GA20ox protein in tobacco in vitro [38]. KNOX can bind to a sequence, TGAC, to regulate the target gene. In potato, TALE proteins, StBEL5 (Solanum tuberosum BEL 5) and POTH1 (potato homeobox 1) form a bond, a StBEL5-POTH1 heterodimer, that targets a composite 10 bp sequence composed of two TGAC cores and has greater binding affinity for the ga20ox1 promoter [48]. The validation of GA20ox showed its apparent suppression in the 35S::LcKNOX6 transgenic line, and this result is consistent with the results of previous studies. However, this activity remains to be investigated in L. chinense. Additionally, the expression of KNAT2 and KNAT6 were found to have little change, whereas the expression of KNAT1 was decreased. The KNOX family genes were recently examined in a study of the evolution and variation of plant morphology. For example, the relationship between A. thaliana and C. hirsute was examined to determine the differences between simple and dissected leaves, and the results showed that the KNOX homeobox genes are repeatedly manipulated to generate natural variation in leaf shape [54]. In most cases, KNOX plays an integral part in leaf complexity and lobe formation. The previous studies indicated that alterations in KNOX activity might contribute to the evolution of divergent leaf morphologies between A. thaliana and C. hirsute, two relatives [8,34]. In fact, the Liriodendron genus includes a sister species pair of L. chinense and L. tulipifera, which are relic lineage from the Tertiary period [55]. The depth of two lobes is an essentially different morphologic trait between these two species. Whether the Liriodendron genus morphology has the similar regulatory model of divergence is a question that needs further investigation. Furthermore, the regulation underlying the KNOX diversification of leaf morphology also needs further research.

5. Conclusions

Based on the transcriptome data, we aimed to identify the candidate genes that may be involved in leaf shape regulation in L. chinense. Then, two candidate KNOX genes of L. chinense were selected with the use of extensive reports on the regulation of the KNOX genes of leaf development in other species. In this work, the full-length sequences of two LcKNOX ORFs were obtained in L. chinense. Then, the ORFs of these two genes were overexpressed in WT A. thaliana (col-0) to preliminarily identify their function. Consequently, we generated three abnormal phenotypes in 35S::LcKNOX6 that presented lobed leaves. Among the lines, the 35S::LcKNOX6-1 leaf shape was very similar to that of L. chinense. The 35S::LcKNOX6-1 and 35S::LcKNOX6-3 lines were prone to being dwarfed and abortive. The 35S::LcKNOX6-2 line presented numerous lobed leaves. In addition to the phenotypes, gene expression with respect to KNOX regulation was also mediated in the 35S::LcKNOX6-2 seedlings. These results indicate that LcKNOX6 might be involved in L. chinense leaf development and even in plant growth regulation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/1/33/s1, Table S1: The primers of PCR assay.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions: J.M. conceived and designed the experiments.; J.M. and G.M. conducted most of the experiments; H.L. (Huanhuan Liu) participated in the SEM scanning experiments; J.M. wrote the original draft; J.M. and H.L. (Huogen Li) reviewed and edited the paper; H.L. (Huogen Li) got the funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31770718 and 31470660).

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770718 and 31470660) and a project funded by the priority academic program development of Jiangsu higher education institutions (PAPD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nicotra, A.B.; Leigh, A.; Boyce, C.K.; Jones, C.S.; Niklas, K.J.; Royer, D.L.; Tsukaya, H. The evolution and functional significance of leaf shape in the angiosperms. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sisó, S.; Camarero, J.; Gil-Pelegrín, E. Relationship between hydraulic resistance and leaf morphology in broadleaf Quercus species: A new interpretation of leaf lobation. Trees 2001, 15, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blein, T.; Pulido, A.; Vialette-Guiraud, A.; Nikovics, K.; Morin, H.; Hay, A.; Johansen, I.E.; Tsiantis, M.; Laufs, P. A conserved molecular framework for compound leaf development. Science 2008, 322, 1835–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Higuchi, Y.; Kawakita, A. Leaf shape deters plant processing by an herbivorous weevil. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Efroni, I.; Eshed, Y.; Lifschitz, E. Morphogenesis of simple and compound leaves: A critical review. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hay, A.; Tsiantis, M. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, J.; Hao, Z.; Guang, X.; Zhao, C.; Wang, P.; Xue, L.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, L.; Sheng, Y.; Zhou, Y. Liriodendron genome sheds light on angiosperm phylogeny and species–pair differentiation. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rast-Somssich, M.I.; Broholm, S.; Jenkins, H.; Canales, C.; Vlad, D.; Kwantes, M.; Bilsborough, G.; Ioio, R.D.; Ewing, R.M.; Laufs, P. Alternate wiring of a KNOXI genetic network underlies differences in leaf development of A. thaliana and C. hirsuta. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 2391–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bar, M.; Ori, N. Leaf development and morphogenesis. Development 2014, 141, 4219–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Barkoulas, M.; Galinha, C.; Grigg, S.P.; Tsiantis, M. From genes to shape: Regulatory interactions in leaf development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamant, O.; Pautot, V. Plant development: A TALE story. C. R. Biol. 2010, 333, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hay, A.; Tsiantis, M. A KNOX family tale. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hake, S.; Vollbrecht, E.; Freeling, M. Cloning Knotted, the dominant morphological mutant in maize using Ds2 as a transposon tag. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vollbrecht, E.; Veit, B.; Sinha, N.; Hake, S. The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature 1991, 350, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Müller, J.; Wang, Y.; Franzen, R.; Santi, L.; Salamini, F.; Rohde, W. In vitro interactions between barley TALE homeodomain proteins suggest a role for protein–protein associations in the regulation of Knox gene function. Plant J. 2001, 27, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Long, J.A.; Moan, E.I.; Medford, J.I.; Barton, M.K. A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 1996, 379, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsuda, K.; Hake, S. Homeobox transcription factors and the regulation of meristem development and maintenance. In Plant Transcription Factors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 215–228. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shani, E.; Burko, Y.; Ben-Yaakov, L.; Berger, Y.; Amsellem, Z.; Goldshmidt, A.; Sharon, E.; Ori, N. Stage-specific regulation of Solanum lycopersicum leaf maturation by class 1 KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX proteins. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3078–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hay, A.; Tsiantis, M. KNOX genes: Versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137, 3153–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hake, S.; Smith, H.M.; Holtan, H.; Magnani, E.; Mele, G.; Ramirez, J. The role of knox genes in plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20, 125–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nagasaki, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Sato, Y.; Matsuoka, M. Functional analysis of the conserved domains of a rice KNOX homeodomain protein, OSH15. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2085–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ma, J.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; Li, H. The analysis of genes and phytohormone metabolic pathways associated with leaf shape development in Liriodendron chinense via De Novo transcriptome sequencing. Genes 2018, 9, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Nakayama, H.; Nakayama, N.; Seiki, S.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Sinha, N.; Kimura, S. Regulation of the KNOX-GA gene module induces heterophyllic alteration in North American lake cress. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4733–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Uchida, N.; Kimura, S.; Koenig, D.; Sinha, N. Coordination of leaf development via regulation of KNOX1 genes. J. Plant Res. 2010, 123, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bharathan, G.; Goliber, T.E.; Moore, C.; Kessler, S.; Pham, T.; Sinha, N.R. Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science 2002, 296, 1858–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Belles-Boix, E.; Hamant, O.; Witiak, S.M.; Morin, H.; Traas, J.; Pautot, V. KNAT6: An Arabidopsis homeobox gene involved in meristem activity and organ separation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dean, G.; Casson, S.; Lindsey, K. KNAT6 gene of Arabidopsis is expressed in roots and is required for correct lateral root formation. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chuck, G.; Lincoln, C.; Hake, S. KNAT1 induces lobed leaves with ectopic meristems when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1277–1289. [Google Scholar]
  29. Meng, C.; Sui, N. Overexpression of maize MYB-IF35 increases chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tu, Z.; Hao, Z.; Zhong, W.; Li, H. Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Assays in Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg. Forests 2019, 10, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M.; Mueller, R.; Nolan, T.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sperschneider, J.; Catanzariti, A.-M.; DeBoer, K.; Petre, B.; Gardiner, D.M.; Singh, K.B.; Dodds, P.N.; Taylor, J.M. LOCALIZER: Subcellular localization prediction of both plant and effector proteins in the plant cell. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, Z.; Li, B.; Liu, J.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, W.-H.; Huang, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y. Transcription factors AS1 and AS2 interact with LHP1 to repress KNOX genes in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Barkoulas, M.; Hay, A.; Kougioumoutzi, E.; Tsiantis, M. A developmental framework for dissected leaf formation in the Arabidopsis relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1136–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hay, A.; Kaur, H.; Phillips, A.; Hedden, P.; Hake, S.; Tsiantis, M. The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Barley, R.; Waites, R. Plant meristems: The interplay of KNOX and gibberellins. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, R696–R698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jasinski, S.; Piazza, P.; Craft, J.; Hay, A.; Woolley, L.; Rieu, I.; Phillips, A.; Hedden, P.; Tsiantis, M. KNOX action in Arabidopsis is mediated by coordinate regulation of cytokinin and gibberellin activities. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sakamoto, T.; Kamiya, N.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Iwahori, S.; Matsuoka, M. KNOX homeodomain protein directly suppresses the expression of a gibberellin biosynthetic gene in the tobacco shoot apical meristem. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Magnani, E.; Hake, S. KNOX lost the OX: The Arabidopsis KNATM gene defines a novel class of KNOX transcriptional regulators missing the homeodomain. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 875–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gehring, W.J.; Affolter, M.; Bürglin, T. Homeodomain proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994, 63, 487–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bertolino, E.; Reimund, B.; Wildt-Perinic, D.; Clerc, R.G. A novel homeobox protein which recognizes a TGT core and functionally interferes with a retinoid-responsive motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 31178–31188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lincoln, C.; Long, J.; Yamaguchi, J.; Serikawa, K.; Hake, S. A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1859–1876. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Bourque, L.; Lacroix, C. Lobe-generating centres in the simple leaves of Myriophyllum aquaticum: Evidence for KN1-like activity. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sentoku, N.; Sato, Y.; Matsuoka, M. Overexpression of rice OSH genes induces ectopic shoots on leaf sheaths of transgenic rice plants. Dev. Biol. 2000, 220, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ikezaki, M.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Kojima, S.; Ueno, Y.; Machida, C.; Machida, Y. Genetic networks regulated by ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and AS2 in leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: KNOX genes control five morphological events. Plant J. 2010, 61, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Spinelli, S.V.; Martin, A.P.; Viola, I.L.; Gonzalez, D.H.; Palatnik, J.F. A mechanistic link between STM and CUC1 during Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1894–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Aida, M.; Ishida, T.; Tasaka, M. Shoot apical meristem and cotyledon formation during Arabidopsis embryogenesis: Interaction among the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes. Development 1999, 126, 1563–1570. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen, H.; Banerjee, A.K.; Hannapel, D.J. The tandem complex of BEL and KNOX partners is required for transcriptional repression of ga20ox1. Plant J. 2004, 38, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scarpella, E.; Barkoulas, M.; Tsiantis, M. Control of leaf and vein development by auxin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Scanlon, M.J. The polar auxin transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid disrupts leaf initiation, KNOX protein regulation, and formation of leaf margins in maize. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Semiarti, E.; Ueno, Y.; Tsukaya, H.; Iwakawa, H.; Machida, C.; Machida, Y. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves. Development 2001, 128, 1771–1783. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hay, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Tsiantis, M. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and auxin activities converge to repress BREVIPEDICELLUS expression and promote leaf development in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 3955–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kierzkowski, D.; Runions, A.; Vuolo, F.; Strauss, S.; Lymbouridou, R.; Routier-Kierzkowska, A.-L.; Wilson-Sánchez, D.; Jenke, H.; Galinha, C.; Mosca, G.; et al. A Growth-Based Framework for Leaf Shape Development and Diversity. Cell 2019, 177, 1405–1418.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ichihashi, Y.; Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Farhi, M.; Chitwood, D.H.; Kumar, R.; Millon, L.V.; Peng, J.; Maloof, J.N.; Sinha, N.R. Evolutionary developmental transcriptomics reveals a gene network module regulating interspecific diversity in plant leaf shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2616–E2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cheng, Y.; Li, H. Interspecies evolutionary divergence in Liriodendron, evidence from the nucleotide variations of LcDHN-like gene. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The sequences of the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 proteins.
Figure 1. The sequences of the LcKNOX1 and LcKNOX6 proteins.
Forests 11 00033 g001
Figure 2. The wild type (WT) and transgenic 35S::LcKNOX Arabidopsis thaliana and Liriodendron chinense phenotypes. (a) The first generation of the LcKNOX1 transgenic seedlings; (b) WT A. thaliana (Col-0); (c) 35S::LcKNOX6-1 transgenic A. thaliana seedlings (the red circle is the positive transgenic plant of 35S::LcKNOX6-1); (d) 35S::LcKNOX6-3 line exhibited dissected and abnormal leaves and abnormal growth, and their growth was weak; (e) 35S::LcKNOX6-2 line presented increased lobes; (f) one leaf from the positive transgenic plant of 35S::LcKNOX6-1; (g) one leaf from L. chinense; (h) 35S::LcKNOX6-3, 35S::LcKNOX6-2 and WT leaves of A. thaliana; and (i) one leaf of 35S::LcKNOX6-1. Bar = 3 cm (ae); bar = 5 mm (f,i); bar = 5 cm (g); and bar = 1 cm (h).
Figure 2. The wild type (WT) and transgenic 35S::LcKNOX Arabidopsis thaliana and Liriodendron chinense phenotypes. (a) The first generation of the LcKNOX1 transgenic seedlings; (b) WT A. thaliana (Col-0); (c) 35S::LcKNOX6-1 transgenic A. thaliana seedlings (the red circle is the positive transgenic plant of 35S::LcKNOX6-1); (d) 35S::LcKNOX6-3 line exhibited dissected and abnormal leaves and abnormal growth, and their growth was weak; (e) 35S::LcKNOX6-2 line presented increased lobes; (f) one leaf from the positive transgenic plant of 35S::LcKNOX6-1; (g) one leaf from L. chinense; (h) 35S::LcKNOX6-3, 35S::LcKNOX6-2 and WT leaves of A. thaliana; and (i) one leaf of 35S::LcKNOX6-1. Bar = 3 cm (ae); bar = 5 mm (f,i); bar = 5 cm (g); and bar = 1 cm (h).
Forests 11 00033 g002
Figure 3. The SEM imaging leaf margin and siliqua epidermis. (a) 35S::LcKNOX6 leaf lobe at the margin; (b) WT A. thaliana leaf margin; (c) siliqua epidermis of 35S::LcKNOX6; and (d) siliqua epidermis of WT A. thaliana. Some stomata on leaf margins and siliqua epidermis cells are pointed out by white arrows. Bar = 50 μm (a,b,d), and bar = 50 μm (c).
Figure 3. The SEM imaging leaf margin and siliqua epidermis. (a) 35S::LcKNOX6 leaf lobe at the margin; (b) WT A. thaliana leaf margin; (c) siliqua epidermis of 35S::LcKNOX6; and (d) siliqua epidermis of WT A. thaliana. Some stomata on leaf margins and siliqua epidermis cells are pointed out by white arrows. Bar = 50 μm (a,b,d), and bar = 50 μm (c).
Forests 11 00033 g003
Figure 4. 35S::LcKNOX6 subcellular localization in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.
Figure 4. 35S::LcKNOX6 subcellular localization in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.
Forests 11 00033 g004
Figure 5. The expression of genes that may be regulated by the KNOX protein in 35S::LcKNOX6 A. thaliana (n = 3 replications for each validation).
Figure 5. The expression of genes that may be regulated by the KNOX protein in 35S::LcKNOX6 A. thaliana (n = 3 replications for each validation).
Forests 11 00033 g005
Table 1. Analysis of the protein physical and chemical properties.
Table 1. Analysis of the protein physical and chemical properties.
GeneAmino Acids (aa)Molecular Weight (kDa)PI ValueMolecular FormulaFat CoefficientInstability CoefficientHydrophilicity
LcKNOX137041564.435.88C1816H2814N512O575S1762.5447.52−0.755
LcKNOX631635783.255.19C1580H2457N429O494S1370.4150.15−0.653

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, J.; Mei, G.; Liu, H.; Li, H. Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana. Forests 2020, 11, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033

AMA Style

Ma J, Mei G, Liu H, Li H. Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana. Forests. 2020; 11(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Jikai, Guoguo Mei, Huanhuan Liu, and Huogen Li. 2020. "Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana" Forests 11, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033

APA Style

Ma, J., Mei, G., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2020). Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana. Forests, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop