When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Study Sites
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Measurements
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Physiological Indices
3.1.1. Results of the Analysis of Variance
3.1.2. Post-Hoc Test Results
3.2. Psychological Indices
3.2.1. Results of the Analysis of Variance
3.2.2. Post-Hoc Test Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Physiological Effects
4.1.1. Blood Pressure
4.1.2. Pulse Rate
4.2. Psychological Effects
4.2.1. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
4.2.2. Restorative Outcome Scale (ROS)
4.2.3. Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS)
4.2.4. Profile of Mood States Questionnaire (POMS)
5. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Inactivity a Leading Cause of Disease and Disability, Warns WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/release23/en/ (accessed on 2 April 2020).
- Betlejewski, S. Social diseases, civilization diseases or lifestyle diseases? Wiad. Lek. 2007, 60, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44399/9789241599979_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 3 April 2020).
- World Health Organization (WHO) Report. Toward More Physical Activity in Cities. Transforming Public Spaces to Promote Physical Activity—A Key Contributor to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Europe. 2017. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/353043/2017_WHO_Report_FINAL_WEB.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2019).
- Polish Main Statistical Office. Demographic Yearbook 2019; Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych: Warsaw, Poland, 2019.
- Jamison, D.T.; Gelband, H.; Horton, S.E.; Jha, P.K.; Laxminarayan, R.; Mock, C.N.; Nugent, R. Disease control priorities: Improving health and reducing poverty (English). In Disease Control Priorities; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/527531512569346552/Disease-control-priorities-improving-health-and-reducing-poverty (accessed on 21 March 2019).
- Li, Q.; Morimoto, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Inagaki, H.; Katsumata, M.; Hirata, Y.; Hirata, K.; Shimizu, T.; Li, Y.J.; Wakayama, Y.; et al. A forest bathing trip increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins in female subjects. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2008, 22, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bielinis, E.; Łukowski, A.; Omelan, A.; Boiko, S.; Takayama, N.; Grebner, D.L. The effect of recreation in a snow-covered forest environment on the psychological wellbeing of young adults: Randomized controlled study. Forests 2019, 10, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beil, K.; Hanes, D. The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—A pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 1250–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- White, M.P.; Pahl, S.; Ashbullby, K.; Herbert, S.; Depledge, M.H. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 35, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyrväinen, L.; Ojala, A.; Korpela, K.; Lanki, T.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Kagawa, T. The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartig, T.; Evans, G.W.; Jamner, L.D.; Davis, D.S.; Gärling, T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stigsdotter, U.K.; Grahn, P. Stressed individuals’ preferences for activities and environmental characteristics in green spaces. Urban For. Urban Green. 2011, 10, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.W.; Ha, S.Y. Examining the influence of school forests on attitudes towards forest and aggression for elementary school students. J. Korean Inst. For. Recreat 2013, 17, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bang, K.-S.; Kim, S.; Song, M.K.; Kang, K.I.; Jeong, Y. The Effects of a Health Promotion Program Using Urban Forests and Nursing Student Mentors on the Perceived and Psychological Health of Elementary School Children in Vulnerable Populations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Korpela, K.; Ylén, M.; Tyrväinen, L.; Silvennoinen, H. Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favourite places. Health Place 2008, 14, 636–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pasanen, T.P.; Ojala, A.; Tyrväinen, L.; Korpela, K.M. Restoration, well-being, and everyday physical activity in indoor, built outdoor and natural outdoor settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 59, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simkin, J.; Ojala, A.; Tyrväinen, L. Restorative effects of mature and young commercial forests, pristine old-growth forest and urban recreation forest—A field experiment. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 48, 126567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowler, D.E.; Buyung-Ali, L.M.; Knight, T.M.; Pullin, A.S. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mitchell, R. Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments? Soc. Sci. Med. 2013, 91, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaczynski, A.T.; Besenyi, G.M.; Stanis, S.A.; Koohsari, M.J.; Oestman, K.B.; Bergstrom, R.; Reis, R.S. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Korpela, K.; Ylén, M.; Tyrväinen, L.; Silvennoinen, H. Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promot. Int. 2010, 25, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Park, B.-J.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Kagawa, T.; Miyazaki, Y. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scand. J. For. Res. 2009, 24, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, R.S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984, 224, 420–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bielinis, E.; Jaroszewska, A.; Łukowski, A.; Takayama, N. The Effects of a Forest Therapy Programme on Mental Hospital Patients with Affective and Psychotic Disorders. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Takayama, N.; Korpela, K.; Lee, J.; Morikawa, T.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Park, B.-J.; Li, Q.; Tyrväinen, L.; Miyazaki, Y.; Kagawa, T. Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 7207–7230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brush, R.O. The attractive of woodland: Perception of forest landowners in Massachusetts. For. Sci. 1979, 25, 495–506. [Google Scholar]
- Kellomäki, S.; Savolainen, R. The scenic value of forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Plans 1984, 11, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, F.S. Landscape managers’ and politicians’ perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. For. Landscape Res. 1993, 1, 79–93. [Google Scholar]
- Janeczko, E. Środowiskowe i Społeczne Uwarunkowania Funkcji Rekreacyjnej Lasów Mazowieckiego Parku Krajobrazowego (MPK). Ph.D. Thesis, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Warsaw, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Willis, K.G.; Garrod, G.; Scarpa, R.; Powe, N.; Lovett, A.; Bateman, I.J.; Hanley, N.; Macmillan, D.C. The Social and Environmental Benefits of Forests in Great Britain; Report to Forestry Commission Edinburgh: Newcastle, UK, 2003.
- Gundersen, V.S.; Frivold, L.H. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For. Urban Green. 2008, 7, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhakal, B.; Yao, R.T.; Turner, J.A.; Barnard, T. Recreational users’ willingness to pay and preferences for changes in planted forest features. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 17, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filyushkina, A.; Agimass, F.; Lundhede, T.; Strange, N.; Bredahl, J.J. Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter? Ecol. Econ. 2017, 140, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Termansen, M.; McClean, C.J.; Jensen, F.S. Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 92, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, A.B.; Jensen, R.B. Some visual aspects of planting design and silviculture across contemporary forest management paradigms—perspectives for urban afforestation. Urban For. Urban Green. 2007, 6, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyrväinen, L.; Miettinen, A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2000, 3, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Donovan, G.H.; Butry, D.T. Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape Urban Plan. 2010, 94, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, L.M.; Cordell, H.K. Residential property values improve by landscaping with trees. South. J. Appl. For. 1985, 9, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansfield, C.A.; Pattanayak, S.K.; McDow, W.; McDonald, R.; Patrick, H. Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing Marchket. J. For. Econ. 2005, 11, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Melichar, J.; Vojáček, O.; Rieger, P.; Jedlička, K. Measuring the value of urban forest using the Hedonic price approach. Reg. Stud. 2009, 2, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
- Brzozowski, P. Internal structure stability of positive and negative concepts. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 1991, 22, 91–106. [Google Scholar]
- Crawford, J.R.; Henry, J.D. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2004, 43, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielinis, E.; Takayama, N.; Boiko, S.; Omelan, A.; Bielinis, L. The effect of winter forest bathing on psychological relaxation of young Polish adults. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 29, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudek, B.; Koniarek, J. The adaptation of Profile of Mood States (POMS) by D.M. McNair M. Lorr, L.F. Droppelman. Przegląd Psychol. 1987, 30, 753–762. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Park, B.J.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Ohira, T.; Kagawa, T.; Miyazaki, Y. Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health 2011, 125, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheeler, M.J.; Dunstan, D.W.; Ellis, K.A.; Cerin, E.; Phillips, S.; Lambert, G.; Naylor, L.H.; Dempsey, P.C.; Kingwell, B.A.; Green, D.J. Effect of Morning Exercise With or Without Breaks in Prolonged Sitting on Blood Pressure in Older Overweight/Obese Adults. Evidence for Sex Differences. Hypertension 2019, 73, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Herrod, P.J.J.; Doleman, B.; Blackwell, J.E.M.; O’Boyle, F.; Williams, J.P.; Lund, J.N.; Phillips, B.E. Exercise and other nonpharmacological strategies to reduce blood pressure in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2018, 12, 248–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takayama, N.; Saito, K.; Fujiwara, A.; Tsutsui, S. Influence of Five-day Suburban Forest Stay on Stress Coping, Resilience, and Mood States. J. Environ. Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dempsey, P.C.; Larsen, R.N.; Dunstan, D.W.; Owen, N.; Kingwell, B.A. Sitting less and moving more: Implications for hypertension. Hypertension 2018, 72, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeigler, Z.S.; Mullane, S.L.; Crespo, N.C.; Buman, M.P.; Gaesser, G.A. Effects of standing and light-intensity activity on ambulatory blood pressure. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ochiai, H.; Ikei, H.; Song, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Miura, T.; Kagawa, T.; Li, Q.; Kumeda, S.; Imai, M.; Miyazaki, Y. Physiological and psychological effects of a forest therapy program on middle-aged females. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 15222–15232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ochiai, H.; Ikei, H.; Song, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Takamatsu, A.; Miura, T.; Kagawa, T.; Li, Q.; Kumeda, S.; Imai, M. Physiological and psychological effects of forest therapy on middle-aged males with high-normal blood pressure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 2532–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Evans, G.W.; Wood, K.W. Assessment of environmental aesthetics in scenic highway corridors. Environ. Behav. 1980, 12, 255–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasar, J.L. The Evaluative Image of the City; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons, R.; Tassinary, L.G.; Ulrich, R.S.; Hebl, M.R.; Grossman-Alexander, M. The view from the road: Implication for stress recovery and immunization. J. Environ. Psychol. 1998, 18, 113–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, K.F.; Hale, W.H.G.; Headley, A.D. Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England. Landscape Urban Plan. 2003, 63, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pynnonen, D.; Propst, D.; Voght, C.; McDought, M. Role of natural and cultural features in residents’ perceptions of rural character. In Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, Bolton Landing, NY, USA, 10–12 April 2005; Peden, J.G., Schuster, R.M., Comps., Eds.; Bolton Landing, NY, USA General Technical Reports NE-341. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2005; pp. 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Janeczko, E. Waloryzacja Krajobrazu Leśnego Wzdłuż Szlaków Komunikacyjnych; Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW: Warsaw, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cassel, J. Physical illness in response to stress. In Social Stress; Levine, S., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 189–209. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Zwan, J.E.; de Vente, W.; Huizink, A.C.; Bögels, S.M.; de Bruin, E.I. Physical activity, mindfulness meditation, or heart rate variability biofeedback for stress reduction: A randomized controlled trial. Appl. Psychophys. Biofeedback 2015, 40, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ribeiro, Í.J.S.; Pereira, R.; Freire, I.V.; De Oliveira, B.G.; Casotti, C.A.; Boery, E.N. Stress and Quality of Life Among University Students: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Prof. Educ. 2018, 4, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascoe, M.C.; Hetrick, S.E.; Parker, A.G. The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 2020, 25, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Q.; Kobayashi, M.; Kumeda, S.; Ochiai, T.; Miura, T.; Kagawa, T.; Imai, M.; Wang, Z.; Otsuka, T.; Kawada, T. Effects of forest bathing on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters in middle-aged males. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 2587381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Otsuka, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Wakayama, Y.; Inagaki, H.; Katsumata, M.; Hirata, Y.; Li, Y.; Hirata, K.; Shimizu, T.; et al. Acute effects of walking in forest environments on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 2845–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Takayama, N.; Park, B.J.; Li, Q.; Song, C.; Komatsu, M.; Ikei, H.; Tyrväinen, L.; Kagawa, T.; et al. Influence of forest therapy on cardiovascular relaxation in young adults. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. 2014, 834360, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jung, W.H.; Woo, J.M.; Ryu, J.S. Effect of a forest therapy program and the forest environment on female workers’ stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konijnendijk, C.C. A decade of urban forestry in Europe. For. Policy Econ. 2003, 5, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takayama, N.; Saito, H.; Fujiwara, A.; Horiuchi, M. The effect of slight thinning of managed coniferous forest on landscape appreciation and psychological restoration. Prog. Earth Planet Sci. 2017, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hartig, T.; Staats, H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. J. Environ. Psychol. 2006, 26, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Kang, J. Soundscape and Sound Preferences in Urban Squares: A Case Study in Sheffield. J. Urban. Des. 2005, 10, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Frederick, C. On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J. Pers. 1997, 65, 529–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takayama, N.; Morikawa, T.; Bielinis, E. Relation between psychological restorativeness and lifestyle, quality of life, resilience, and stress-coping in forest settings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bielinis, E.; Omelan, A.; Boiko, S.; Bielinis, L. The restorative effect of staying in a broad-leaved forest on healthy young adults in winter and spring. Balt. For. 2018, 24, 218–227. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, A.; Hillsdon, M.; Coombes, E. Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prev. Med. 2009, 49, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
DF | SYS | DIA | Pulse | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Site | 3 | 4.55 ** | 5.18 ** | 2.33 |
Time | 1 | 13.91 *** | 8.78 ** | 1.05 |
Site × Time | 3 | 0.24 | 1.85 | 1.80 |
Site | Apartment Suburbs | Green Suburbs | Coniferous Forest | Deciduous Forest | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measures | Time | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
SYS | pre | 134.77 | 13.51 | 131.13 | 17.39 | 124.00 | 21.95 | 119.59 | 15.03 | 128.35a | 17.44 |
post | 128.59 | 21.57 | 124.57 | 13.26 | 119.38 | 16.87 | 110.47 | 11.67 | 121.65b | 17.51 | |
131.68a | 18.06 | 127.85a | 15.65 | 121.69ab | 19.32 | 115.03b | 14.04 | 125.00 | 17.74 | ||
DIA | pre | 79.86 | 11.25 | 80.30 | 10.08 | 72.62 | 11.06 | 69.53 | 6.58 | 76.40a | 10.81 |
post | 77.86 | 10.21 | 73.96 | 11.73 | 72.46 | 9.48 | 66.41 | 9.29 | 73.13b | 11.00 | |
78.86a | 10.67 | 77.13a | 11.28 | 72.54ab | 10.09 | 67.97b | 8.08 | 74.77 | 11.00 | ||
Pulse | pre | 87.45 | 13.40 | 90.39 | 15.07 | 76.15 | 11.75 | 83.18 | 13.34 | 85.43 | 14.30 |
post | 86.82 | 14.51 | 84.26 | 14.66 | 77.69 | 13.44 | 83.06 | 12.29 | 83.60 | 13.96 | |
87.14 | 13.81 | 87.33 | 15.02 | 76.92 | 12.39 | 83.12 | 12.63 | 84.51 | 14.11 |
DF | PANAS | ROS | SVS | POMS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Tension | Depression | Anger | Fatigue | Confusion | Vigor | ||||
Site | 3 | 1.66 | 1.33 | 0.47 | 0.15 | 3.07 * | 0.62 | 2.27 | 0.78 | 1.01 | 0.67 |
Time | 1 | 0.63 | 12.70 *** | 14.61 *** | 7.44 ** | 44.97 *** | 23.57 *** | 12.35 *** | 34.87 *** | 10.47 ** | 13.71 *** |
Site × Time | 3 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 0.55 | 0.68 |
Site | Apartment Suburbs | Green Suburbs | Coniferous Forest | Deciduous Forest | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measures | Time | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
PANAS | pre | 3.00 | 0.57 | 3.05 | 0.55 | 2.51 | 1.01 | 3.06 | 0.99 | 2.95 | 0.78 |
Positive | post | 2.95 | 0.60 | 3.12 | 0.75 | 2.65 | 1.02 | 3.19 | 1.09 | 3.00 | 0.85 |
2.98 | 0.58 | 3.08 | 0.65 | 2.58 | 1.00 | 3.13 | 1.03 | 2.97 | 0.81 | ||
PANAS | pre | 1.58 | 0.41 | 1.57 | 0.55 | 1.52 | 0.67 | 1.36 | 0.43 | 1.52a | 0.51 |
Negative | post | 1.46 | 0.43 | 1.42 | 0.51 | 1.33 | 0.51 | 1.19 | 0.20 | 1.37b | 0.44 |
1.52 | 0.42 | 1.50 | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.44 | 0.48 | ||
ROS | pre | 4.08 | 1.14 | 4.42 | 1.00 | 4.04 | 1.55 | 4.51 | 1.34 | 4.28a | 1.22 |
post | 4.58 | 0.96 | 4.67 | 1.27 | 4.67 | 1.46 | 4.89 | 1.26 | 4.69b | 1.20 | |
4.33 | 1.07 | 4.55 | 1.14 | 4.35 | 1.51 | 4.69 | 1.30 | 4.48 | 1.22 | ||
SVS | pre | 4.42 | 1.34 | 4.37 | 1.50 | 3.96 | 1.87 | 4.18 | 1.79 | 4.27a | 1.57 |
post | 4.55 | 1.17 | 4.75 | 1.56 | 4.52 | 1.54 | 4.72 | 1.72 | 4.64b | 1.46 | |
4.48 | 1.25 | 4.56 | 1.52 | 4.24 | 1.70 | 4.43 | 1.75 | 4.45 | 1.52 |
Site | Apartment Suburbs | Green Suburbs | Coniferous Forest | Deciduous Forest | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measures | Time | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
Tension | pre | 1.22 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.96a | 0.66 |
post | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.57b | 0.53 | |
1.00a | 0.65 | 0.79ab | 0.65 | 0.69ab | 0.67 | 0.49a | 0.41 | 0.77 | 0.63 | ||
Depression | pre | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.67a | 0.56 |
post | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.48b | 0.61 | |
0.64 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.96 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.58 | 0.59 | ||
Anger | pre | 1.12 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.96 | 0.67 | 0.93a | 0.57 |
post | 0.97 | 0.41 | 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.76b | 0.45 | |
1.04 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.35 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.52 | ||
Fatigue | pre | 1.45 | 0.89 | 1.37 | 0.96 | 1.49 | 1.04 | 1.87 | 1.06 | 1.53a | 0.98 |
post | 1.05 | 0.86 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 0.78 | 1.33 | 0.86 | 1.10b | 0.90 | |
1.25 | 0.89 | 1.19 | 1.01 | 1.29 | 0.92 | 1.60 | 0.99 | 1.32 | 0.96 | ||
Confusion | pre | 1.11 | 0.54 | 1.11 | 0.69 | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 1.01a | 0.65 |
post | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.42 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.79b | 0.55 | |
1.02 | 0.58 | 0.95 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.61 | ||
Vigor | pre | 2.00 | 0.75 | 2.14 | 0.65 | 1.75 | 1.13 | 2.21 | 1.05 | 2.05a | 0.87 |
post | 2.45 | 0.64 | 2.29 | 0.72 | 2.18 | 1.03 | 2.51 | 1.00 | 2.37b | 0.82 | |
2.23 | 0.72 | 2.22 | 0.68 | 1.97 | 1.09 | 2.36 | 1.02 | 2.21 | 0.86 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Janeczko, E.; Bielinis, E.; Wójcik, R.; Woźnicka, M.; Kędziora, W.; Łukowski, A.; Elsadek, M.; Szyc, K.; Janeczko, K. When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults. Forests 2020, 11, 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050591
Janeczko E, Bielinis E, Wójcik R, Woźnicka M, Kędziora W, Łukowski A, Elsadek M, Szyc K, Janeczko K. When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults. Forests. 2020; 11(5):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050591
Chicago/Turabian StyleJaneczko, Emilia, Ernest Bielinis, Roman Wójcik, Małgorzata Woźnicka, Wojciech Kędziora, Adrian Łukowski, Mohamed Elsadek, Katarzyna Szyc, and Krzysztof Janeczko. 2020. "When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults" Forests 11, no. 5: 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050591
APA StyleJaneczko, E., Bielinis, E., Wójcik, R., Woźnicka, M., Kędziora, W., Łukowski, A., Elsadek, M., Szyc, K., & Janeczko, K. (2020). When Urban Environment Is Restorative: The Effect of Walking in Suburbs and Forests on Psychological and Physiological Relaxation of Young Polish Adults. Forests, 11(5), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050591