Next Article in Journal
Annual Availability of Forest Biomass Resources for Woody Biomass Power Generation Plants from Subcompartments and Aggregated Forests in Tohoku Region of Japan
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential Differences and Methods of Determining Gypsy Moth Female Flight Capabilities: Implications for the Establishment and Spread in Novel Habitats
Previous Article in Journal
Reciprocal Common Garden Altitudinal Transplants Reveal Potential Negative Impacts of Climate Change on Abies religiosa Populations in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve Overwintering Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Forest Management Effects on Terrestrial Leaf Litter Inhabiting Arthropods
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/f12010070
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Infection and Spread of Root Rot Caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies Stands after Thinning: Case Studies on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands

by
Darta Klavina
1,*,
Lauma Bruna
1,
Astra Zaluma
1,
Natalija Burnevica
1,
Kaspars Polmanis
1,
Talis Gaitnieks
1 and
Tuula Piri
2
1
Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, Rigas 111, LV 2169 Salaspils, Latvia
2
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Management and Production of Renewable Resources Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(1), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010070
Submission received: 19 November 2020 / Revised: 4 January 2021 / Accepted: 7 January 2021 / Published: 9 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Pathology and Entomology)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Afforestation of former agricultural lands is a common practice in several countries. This is beneficial for avoiding diseases carry-over from previous forest generations and to expand forest areas. However, several biotic and abiotic risks have been reported in such stands, including a higher risk of Heterobasidion root rot after thinning. Therefore, this study investigates the spread of Heterobasidion root rot in three Picea abies (L.) Karst. plantations in Latvia established on former pasture and meadow lands and subjected to forest management practices. Initially, to determine average infection rate, we sampled all standing trees (157 in total) along transects within sampling areas. On the transects, the proportion of trees suffering from Heterobasidion root rot varied from 16 to 33% among stands. Based on those data and observed dieback over all the stands, we established circular sample plots in disease centres where all trees and stumps were analysed. The average infection rate in the circular plots varied from 34 to 41%. Obtained Heterobasidion isolates were analysed with species-specific primers and were all determined to be Heterobasidion parviporum Niemelä & Korhonen. Isolates were paired to detect the number and size of genotypes. Of 141 genets examined, 99 were isolated from only one tree or stump, while 42 formed genets including two or more trees or stumps indicating spread of infection through root contacts. The total number of Heterobasidion genets per hectare in studied stands varied from 72 to 484. The following conclusions were reached: (i) stands on former non-forest lands (pastures and meadows) can be highly susceptible to Heterobasidion infection after thinning, (ii) the pathogen may form expanding territorial clones in both former pasture and meadows and (iii) stump treatment with biological or chemical control agents is recommended to prevent Heterobasidion infections.

1. Introduction

Changes in land use from pastures, meadows, or agricultural fields to forest plantations is a common practice in many countries. For instance, in the European Union, 12.9 million hectares of abandoned lands were afforested in 1995–2015 [1]. Agricultural lands differ from lands with previous forest coverage, and thus forest management strategies should consider the most appropriate tree species and potential risks [2,3,4]. Therefore, several studies have compared stand growth rate and growth conditions in forest lands vs. former agricultural lands [5,6].
One of the most commonly planted conifer tree species in former agricultural lands in Latvia and other Baltic and Nordic countries is Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) [7]. Norway spruce is highly susceptible to root rot caused by Heterobasidion spp. [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In Latvia, the country-scale inventory revealed that about 22% of spruce trees contained heart rot, mostly caused by Heterobasidion parviporum Niemelä & Korhonen, which results in severe economic losses [14,15]. More than half of the territory of Latvia is covered by forest and the forest sector contributes almost 20% to total exports from Latvia [16]. Consequently, reduction of economic losses caused by root rot is crucial.
Infected previous-generation stumps are important for transfer of Heterobasidion infection to subsequent tree generation through root contacts [10,11,17,18,19,20,21]. Therefore, forest planting in infection-free areas and afforestation on former agricultural lands or pastures are important strategies to decrease infection potential [22].
Nevertheless, several studies have reported similar butt rot incidence rate in former fields or grazing land in comparison with former forestlands [23] or even severe damage in former agricultural lands [24,25,26,27]. Modelling based on stump infection rate with Heterobasidion in spruce stands revealed that former pastures and arable lands are more susceptible to root rot than forest stands [28]. A more recent study form Czech Republic indicated differences in infection rate among different previous land uses, indicating higher infection in former arable lands than in former pastures [29].
Higher infection rate on former agricultural lands has been related to different factors: (i) soil chemical parameters such as high carbonate content, high nitrogen content or overall unbalanced nutrient status [4,30,31,32], (ii) soil compaction that stimulates the superficial root system of Norway spruce [26], (iii) biotic factors such as lack of fungi antagonistic to Heterobasidion [4,26,31,33,34,35,36], and (iv) increased percentage of grass cover [30].
Forest management practices, especially cuttings, are significant for the establishment of Heterobasidion infections in stands on former agricultural lands where primary spore infection of freshly cut conifer stumps is the main route for disease spread. In contrast, in former forest lands, mycelial infections originating from the old stumps or roots can be a more significant source of disease spread. Therefore, several studies on former agricultural land have focused on root rot development after first thinning [37,38,39]. Although the incidence of Heterobasidion root rot is highly dependent on the degree of stump infection, the possibility of direct root infection cannot be completely omitted. For instance, Rönnberg et al. [40] showed high incidence of Heterobasidion root rot in unthinned spruce stands planted on pastureland. Thor and Stenlid [41] found 0.5–8.1% of trees infected in unthinned spruce stands established on former agricultural land and even up to 16.9% infected in an unthinned stand in former pastureland.
Secondary infections occur when hyphae of the pathogens spread to root systems of adjacent trees via root contacts, which can produce expanding disease centres [42,43]. To obtain detailed knowledge on secondary infection, Swedjemark and Stenlid [44] analysed the population structures of Heterobasidion annosum s.l. in spruce stands on former arable lands and found that seven years after thinning, 63% of trees have decay symptoms and were infected by mycelial spread from stumps. In another Swedish study, comparing the growth rate of artificially inoculated Heterobasidion mycelia in the stem and roots of Norway spruce growing on forest land and arable land, concluded that on average, Heterobasidion growth rate in both tree and stump roots did not differ significantly between former arable and forest sites [19].
However, the previously mentioned studies were carried out on former agricultural lands in Sweden and Scotland and the results are not necessarily applicable to other soil and forest types as well as different management practices (both agricultural and forestry). Comparable studies have not been performed in Norway spruce stands in Latvia or neighboring countries, indicating the need for such studies. In a recent Latvian study dealing with Heterobasidion root rot in Scots pine stands, Zaļuma et al. [45] reported a lower expansion rate of Heterobasidion root rot in pine plantations established on former agricultural land in comparison with former forestland. Consequently, in addition to the previously mentioned studies, it is very important for practical forestry in Latvia to obtain detailed, more specific information about the spread of Heterobasidion root rot in Norway spruce stands on sites with non-forest history.
The aim of this work was to investigate the distribution patterns (primary and secondary infection) of Heterobasidion spp. in managed Norway spruce plantations established on former meadows and pasturelands in central part of Latvia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Experimental Design

The study was established in three Norway spruce stands in Central Latvia, in the municipalities of Babite, Auce, and Olaine (Figure 1). In this region, average annual temperature ranges from 6.8 to 7.9 °C and annual precipitation rate is 574 to 636 mm. For Central Latvia, dry pine and spruce forests on sandy or loamy soils, water-saturated areas (peat bogs, wet forest types, flood plain meadows, etc.) with peat soils or drained forests and a large proportion of former agricultural fields on loamy soils are characteristic. The first-rotation spruce plantations in the study represent this variety: a drained forest within a region of peat bogs (Stand 1), a spruce plantation within a region dominated by agricultural fields (Stand 2), and a dry-type (Oxalidosa) stand (Stand 3). Characteristics of the investigated areas are presented in Table 1.
All stands had selective or sanitary thinning (Table 1); since after thinning, stumps were not treated with any control agents to prevent infection of root rot, at least potentially, stumps were exposed to primary infection of Heterobasidion.
Soil samples for chemical analysis were collected at 0–20 cm depth along transects every 50 m. Chemical analyses of soil were conducted using established standard methods (International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard) at LSFRI Silava, Laboratory of Forest Environment, Salaspils, Latvia. Samples were prepared for analysis according to ISO 11464:1994. The soil pH was determined in 1 M KCl (soil—extractant mixture 1:2.5). Total carbon content was determined using an elemental analyser ELTRA CS530 (Eltra GmbH, Haan, Germany) according to LVS ISO 10694. The concentration of total N was determined using the Kjeldahl method (ISO 11261:1995) and P was assayed by colourimetry using the ammonium molybdate spectrometric method in 1 M HCl solution (soil/extractant mixture 1:5). Concentration of K, Ca, and Mg was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer with an acetylene-air flame in 1 M HCl extract.
To determine average infection rate, we sampled all standing trees within a 2-m-wide transect parallel to the longest edge of each stand with starting points in the middle of the shortest edge. Health status was assigned to each tree in the transect: (i) visually healthy crowns and (ii) trees with severe dieback symptoms, dead and windthrown trees [9]. To detect the pathogen under laboratory conditions, wood samples were collected from all trees on the transect with the aid of an increment borer (one sample per tree at root collar height). Additionally, to characterise stand growth rate, we measured the diameter at breast height and, for living trees, the tree height (Table 1).
Based on the transect data about the distribution of Heterobasidion infected trees and visual observation of potential infection centers, we established from five to eleven circular sample plots per stand (10 m radius, 314 m2) where all trees and stumps were sampled and examined for Heterobasidion fruit bodies. In addition, stumps were classified as either stumps from the 1st or 2nd thinning. Broken dead tree trunks of different heights were categorized as stumps. Wood samples from trees were collected with an increment borer (one sample per tree at root collar height) and from stumps—either with the same method or with the aid of an axe if they were heavily decomposed. Wood samples from each tree were placed into individual plastic tubes and stump samples into individual plastic bags. All sampled trees and stumps (both in transects and circular plots) were numbered and their location mapped. Field work was carried out from March 2019 to April 2020.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Heterobasidion Genotypes

In the laboratory, all wood samples were surface sterilized by flaming and placed on petri dishes containing malt extract agar (MEA) media (for tree samples) or Hagem agar media (for stump samples). After a 5 to 7-day incubation, the plates were examined under a Leica stereomicroscope M205C (20–30× magnification) to detect the presence of Heterobasidion spp., observing its characteristic asexual sporulation (conidiophores and conidia) on wood samples [10]. If Heterobasidion was observed, colonies were sampled with sterilised surgical forceps and placed on new MEA media. Outgrowing Heterobasidion mycelia were subcultured to obtain pure fungal cultures.
Isolates originating from the same circular sample plot were subjected to pairwise somatic compatibility tests by confronting their mycelia on Hagem agar media in 9 cm Petri dishes in all combinations. The genets were identified either by recording the line of demarcation in the contact zone of confrontation (demonstrating that the genotypes are different) or by observing free fusion of the mycelia (implying that the genotypes were identical) [46].
The results of this test provided an information about the total number and size of Heterobasidion genets: number of genets encompassing only one tree or stump and number of genets encompassing two or more trees and (or) stumps. Based on these data, we estimated the number of trees/stumps infected by Heterobasidion genets per hectare and per disease centre. To estimate the area and maximum width of each genet including two or more trees/stumps, we used the map of each site with all sampled trees and stumps mapped. We used species specific primers (Heterobasidion parviporum specific primers KJ-F and KJ-R and Heterobasidion annosum specific primers MJ-F and MJ-R) to determine the Heterobasidion species of each genotype [47]. DNA was extracted from fungal cultures representing each genotype using a CTAB method [48]. Two PCR reactions were run with each sample—one with H.parviporum and other with H.annosum species specific primers listed above. PCR conditions, were a described by Hantula and Vainio [47]. DNA from H. parviporum and H. annosum was used as a positive control.

2.3. Data Analysis

A chi-square (χ2) test of independence from the actual number of observations of infected or decaying trees and stumps was used to compare abundance patterns between sites and sample plots [49].
Using the geospatial tool QGIS 3.2.0-Bonn (bc43194) (https://qgis.org/api/3.2/), tree spatial location was visualised and the width and the area of genets including two or more trees/stumps was measured (tool “MeasureLine” and “MeasureArea”). The maximum expansion rates were calculated as a reference taking years from the first thinning for each stand (2007, 1991 and 1987, respectively, Stand 1 to 3) or from the second thinning (2015, 2010 and 2017, respectively, Stand 1 to 3).
To assess which factors have an impact on the number of trees per genet, we used generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) assuming a Poisson error distribution. The full model included number of trees per genet as a response variable and as fixed effects we tested site, stand age class (older stands (Stand 1 and 2) vs. younger stand (Stand 3), disease centre infection indicators (classes of infection (<40% vs. >40%), stump and dead tree proportion) and as a random factor in all models we included disease centre. Models were calculated using the program package lme4 [50].
Area and width of genets including two or more trees/stumps as well as maximum expansion rates (area and width) were tested for normality using the Shapiro and Wilk normality test at significance level α = 0.001 [51]. If normality was assessed, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Fisher LSD post-hoc test was calculated [52]. If normality was not assessed, nonparametric Wilcoxon test (unpaired samples) was used to compare parameters. For calculations, R version 4.0.2 was used [53].

3. Results

3.1. Incidence of Dieback and Heterobasidion Infection

In total, in all three study sites, 851 wood samples were collected for Heterobasidion isolation (397 from living trees, 118 from dead trees and 336 from stumps). The number of sampled trees and stumps are given in Table 2. In all stands, stumps from both 1st and 2nd thinning were present and in addition there were some trees broken close to their base (mainly in Stand 2) (Table 2).
In Stand 2 and 3, chi-square test of independence showed that transect and disease center data have similar tendencies regarding the number of living and dead trees (p > 0.05). In contrast, chi-square test for Stand 1 data indicated significant differences in living and dead tree abundance in disease centers and the transect (χ2 = 11.65; df = 1; n = 216) (there were less dead trees in the transect (χ2 = 5.67) than expected).
Additionally, a chi-square test of independence was performed to examine the numbers of living trees and stumps among sites. The relation between these variables was significant, χ2 = 24.17 (df = 2, n = 657), p < 0.05. The highest chi-square values were observed for both living trees and stumps in Stand 3: more living trees (χ2 = 7.52) and less stumps (χ2 = 7.18) than predicted.
The transects of both Stand 2 and 3 had several openings, which explains the lower number of trees per hectare in comparison with disease centres (Table 2). In Stand 3, these openings were related to stand planting design (there were several gaps left to facilitate thinning). Stand 3 had higher planting density that reflects in the number of trees per hectare (Table 2).
In addition, fruit bodies were recorded as an indicator of disease of trees and stumps. There were more records of fruit bodies in Stand 1 (two dead trees and 10 stumps with fruit bodies) compared to other stands (there were two fruit bodies recorded in Stand 2 and four fruit bodies in Stand 3, found exclusively on stumps in both stands).
After incubation of 851 collected wood samples, we detected pathogen conidiophores with conidia in 302 samples (35%); infection rate varied among stands (30% in Stand 1 and 39% in Stands 2 and 3) (Table 3).
Chi-square test indicated that in transects and disease centres, the incidence of Heterobasidion infection was similar among sites (p > 0.05). In addition, the infection incidence of both living and dead trees in disease centres have a similar pattern among sites (p > 0.05). In total, we confirmed the presence of the pathogen in 31.8 and 48.3% of all living and dead tree samples, respectively. Infection incidences of living trees among sites was 24.5, 38.6 and 35.2% (Stand 1 to 3, respectively) and of dead trees 58.1, 35.7 and 51.5% (Stand 1 to 3, respectively). In total, we confirmed the presence of the pathogen in 34.2% of all stump samples. Infection incidences varied among stump samples at different sites: 26.1, 39.6 and 40.8% (Stand 1 to 3, respectively). However, the differences were not significant.

3.2. Analysis of Heterobasidion Genets

Pure Heterobasidion sp. cultures were successfully isolated from 90.5% of a total of 286 wood samples producing Heterobasidion conidiophores with conidia collected from disease centers (76.3, 98.8, and 96.3% from Stands 1 to 3, respectively) (Table 3). Identification with species specific primers revealed that all obtained isolates belonged to species Heterobasidion parviporum.
In total, 141 Heterobasidion genets were detected resulting in 72 to 484 Heterobasidion genets per hectare among study sites (Table 4). Less genets per hectare were detected in Stand 1 (2.9 times and 6.7 times less in comparison with Stand 2 and Stand 3, respectively).
The mean number of trees/stumps per genet was 2.8, 2.1 and 1.4 in Stand 1 to 3, respectively. Genets including one tree/stump were the most abundant in all sites: 13, 27, 59 (i.e., 52, 68 and 78% of all genets per stand), in Stand 1 to 3, respectively. Expanded genets including two or more trees/stumps were less frequent 12, 13 and 17 (Stand 1 to 3 respectively). Chi-square test indicated differences among abundance of genets including one tree/stump and genets including two or more trees/stumps per sites (χ2 = 6.1, df = 2, n = 141; p > 0.05).
Frequency of trees or stumps infected by genets including one tree/stump of all infected trees and stumps was 21, 25 and 56% (Stand 1 to 3, respectively). Chi-square test indicated differences among abundance of trees and stumps infected by genets including one tree/stump per sites (χ2 = 26.3, df = 2, n = 259; p > 0.05), in particular abundance of trees and stumps of genets including one tree/stump in Stand 1 was lower than predicted (χ2 = 7.4) and in Stand 3 higher than predicted (χ2 = 8.4).
In comparison with Stand 1 and 2, Stand 3 had more isolates and consequently more genets (in total and both genets including one tree/stump and genets including two or more trees/stumps). Stand 3 had a lower number of trees per genet and less expanded genets including two or more trees/stumps (lower distance among trees and area) (Table 4). Modeling the number of trees per genet and including disease centres as a random factor revealed that grouping Stand 1 and 2 together (older stands) vs. Stand 3 identified a significant difference (p < 0.05).
The maximum number of trees infected by genets including two or more trees/stumps are presented in Table 4. The largest genets included both living and dead trees and stumps. The longest mean distance between trees and (or) stumps with shared genets was about 7–10 m (maximum 15–18 m) (Stands 1 and 2) compared with values of Stand 3 (mean longest distance 3 m; maximum 7 m) (Table 4). Analysis of variance showed significant differences and post-hoc tests indicated that the genets including two or more trees/stumps in Stand 3 were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller in size than genets in Stand 1 (3.3 times smaller) and in Stand 2 (2.3 times smaller).
The maximum area of genets including two or more trees/stumps in Stand 1 was 2.6 to 8 times greater than in Stand 2 and 3 (Table 4). The mean area of genets including two or more trees/stumps was also 5 to 9 time larger in Stand 1. Analysis of variance showed significant differences and post-hoc tests indicated that the genets including two or more trees/stumps in Stand 1 had significantly (p < 0.05) larger area than both Stand 2 and 3 (p < 0.05).
The maximum expansion length per year calculated from the first thinning was 1.5, 0.5 and 0.2 m (Stand 1 to 3, respectively) and maximum expansion area per year: 11.5, 1.9, and 0.5 m2 (Stand 1 to 3, respectively). Wilcoxon test showed that also mean expansion indicators (distance and area per year) were higher in Stand 1 in comparison with Stand 2 and Stand 3 (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Dieback and Observed Heterobasidion Infection of Norway Spruce on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands

Visual observation of stand health status revealed expansive spread of root rot in the studied Norway spruce stands on former non-forest lands (pastures and meadows) in Latvia. The greater total number of trees and stumps per hectare in Stand 3 is mainly related with greater planting density. The number of stumps indicates intensity of thinning and, therefore, potential infection risk of stumps by Heterobasidion spores. Greater abundance of stumps might also favor the mycelial spread of Heterobasidion since its growth rate in stump roots is significantly faster than in living trees [19,54]. Moreover, in densely planted stands, where the trees or stumps are closer to each other, the possibility of root contacts is higher, thus allowing greater probability of infection transmission [4].
In Stand 2, there were several trees broken at different heights (Table 2), which indirectly indicates reduced tree vitality. In addition, gaps and a low number of trees per transect might indicate not only a reduced number of trees due to the stand age but also poor current and previous pathological conditions within the stand.
Fruit bodies were found in all study sites, which indicates that environmental conditions were suitable for fruiting of H. parviporum. Consequently, the risk of primary infection by H. parviporum spores should be taken into account when planning future thinning in these stands or other similar sites.
The detected H. parviporum infection rate (30% to 39%) was on average in line with data from other studies from both former agricultural and forest lands. It indicates that even though no inoculum is present in former non-forest lands, infection can establish and expand as successfully as in forest lands or even more successfully. For instance, in a Swedish study carried out on a spruce stand on former agricultural land, seven years after thinning, 63% of the trees had decay symptoms [45]. In Sweden, modelling of spruce stands including different former land use indicated 2–90% of rotted trees in final cuttings [55]. In Denmark, on average, 23% (max. 94%) of Norway spruce individuals growing on former agricultural or grazing fields were found to suffer from butt rot [23].
The success rate of H. parviporum isolation from dead spruce individuals was 35.7 to 58.1%. However, since the pathogen was not detected in all dead spruce individuals, it cannot be excluded that either the infection has not yet spread higher in the stem or that causes other than Heterobasidion root rot were responsible for a proportion of declining or dead trees. Other fungal agents as Armillaria sp. can cause root rot in Norway spruce stands [56]. In addition, spruce dieback not related to root rot has been observed in several regions in Latvia [57].
The frequency of stumps colonized by H. parviporum (34.2% on average) was relatively high in spruce stands planted in former pastures and meadows in Latvia. Viable Heterobasidion mycelium can survive in stumps for decades [58]. However, with time, it develops more intensively in deeper layers of stumps [59] and isolation can be difficult due to wood decomposition and presence of other stump colonizing fungi. Since the stumps in the studied stands were not recently cut, total stump infection may be even higher. Infected spruce stumps left after thinning transfer root rot to residual trees and serve as a source of infection [21,54]. Therefore, winter thinning and use of biological control agents containing spores of Phlebiopsis gigantea or other preventive substances such as urea is recommended to limit the infection of conifer stumps by basidiospores of Heterobasidion spp. [43,60,61,62], especially in stands with no previous rot incidences such as in stands established on former agricultural lands [4,63,64].

4.2. Heterobasidion Genets

All obtained Heterobasidion isolates were identified as Heterobasidion parviporum, which is the most common Heterobasidion species causing damage in spruce stands in Northern Europe and Latvia [15,65]. H. parviporum is adapted to spruce as the host species [66,67] and is therefore more often observed in spruce stands, being predominant or exclusive in some cases [9,68,69,70], and is able to spread more frequently from stumps to neighbouring trees than H. annosum [71]. Korhonen et al. [72] reported that Heterobasidion infections in spruce stands on former agricultural lands were mainly caused by H. parviporum and concluded that in such first rotation spruce stands without any history of pine growth and woody inoculum, spores of H. parviporum are the principal infection source. Moreover, Vasiliauskas and Stenlid [18] showed that H. parviporum is better adapted to spruce wood, and spreads more extensively in spruce stems compared to H. annosum.
In our study, the number of trees/stumps infected by H. parviporum per hectare was 208, 445 and 669 (Stand 1 to 3, respectively) (Table 4). In addition, the total number of Heterobasidion genets per hectare in the present study was high: 72, 212, and 484 (Stand 1 to 3, respectively). In comparison, in a Finnish study on Heterobasidion infections on clear-felled forests on old forest sites, the number of fungal genets per hectare varied from 2 to 158 (mean 28) [73]. The high infection rate and high number of Heterobasidion genets in the present study may indicate a higher susceptibility of Norway spruce to Heterobasidion root rot on former agricultural lands compared to old forest lands [2].
The number of genets including only one tree or stump was lower in older stands (Stand 1 and 2) than in the youngest one (Stand 3). Time from the first thinning did, however, not differ significantly between the stands (Table 1). However, even in final cuttings on old forest sites, genets including one tree/stump and therefore primary infection can be dominant [73]. In general, a lower number of trees infected by the same Heterobasidion genet and occupying a smaller stand area indicate that these clones are relatively younger than those comprised of more trees and covering a larger area [44]. However, the age of the genets of Heterobasidion may affect the pathogenicity of the fungus, with younger genets being more pathogenic [39].
Development of territorial clones following primary infection of Heterobasidion takes at least 7–8 years [42,44,74]. In our study, 22 to 48% of detected genets formed expanding territorial clones, which included 44 to 79% of infected trees and (or) stumps. This indicates that infection in all sites is well established and expanding. Due to well-developed clonality, in Stand 1 and 2, it is most probable that infection was initiated due to the first thinning (12, 28 years ago), and not by the more recent ones (4, 18 years ago) (Stand 1 and 2, respectively). In Stand 3, infection history seems to be much more recent than in other stands and probably more expansive after the last thinning (two-years before sampling) than after the first one (32-years before sampling). In addition, greater planting density in Stand 3 could favour development of territorial clones in a shorter period as indicated previously [35,42,44].
Comparing the maximum size of Heterobasidion genets with other studies, we found genets of similar size also reported from stands with a much longer infection history. For instance, Vasiliauskas and Stenlid [18] reported territorial clones of H. annosum s.l. up to 20 m in diameter in a 60 year-old spruce stand planted in a previously infected pine site, while in the oldest stands of our study (Stand 1 and 2), territorial clones reached up to 14–17 m. In addition, the largest distance between isolates from the same genet in Finnish study [69] in 70 to 100 year-old spruce stands was 13 m, which is less than in our study on former non-forest lands. Previous studies indicate that H. parviporum can form large territorial clones. Stenlid [46] studied a 120-year-old and thinned P. abies stand and detected H. parviporum territorial clones reaching up to 30 m in diameter. Similarly, up to 40 m long territorial clones of H. parviporum were observed in an intensively thinned P. abies stands in Serbia [74]. In related studies from Finland, the maximal length of territorial clones varied between approximately 10 and 30 m [9,66] or reached up to 55 m [73]. Our study shows that even 12 to 32 years after thinnings in stands on former pastures and meadows, H. parviporum can form large territorial clones.
The maximum number of trees per genet in our study was 12 and this is lower in comparison to stands on former forest lands (i.e., a Finnish study [67] reported 16 trees per genet) and also to stands on former pasturelands, where a greater number of trees (up to 25) forming territorial clones have been reported [40]. However, the real number of infected trees and stumps in our study could be greater than detected due to various reasons: (i) stump decomposition and poor isolation success from some samples, (ii) sampling height of trees (root collar) excluding infection in lower zones, (iii) sample number (one sample per tree) not covering all stem inner surface where decay column can be located, and (iv) limited sampling area (territory of circular sample plot). In addition, to estimate the exact borders and size of Heterobasidion genets, a thorough analyses of excavated root systems would be required. Consequently, the size of the genets may actually be bigger.
All the largest H. parviporum genets of our study contained three to nine dead trees or stumps. Stumps colonized by Heterobasidion provide a substrate from which the fungus can spread and cause infection in standing trees [21]. A study by Capretti and Mugnai [26] indicated that dead wood (buried wood in their study) might be an important factor for extensive spread of the pathogen especially in former pasture soil. Recent studies show that root fragments are important for H. parviporum infection transfer [75]. Therefore, both abundance of dead wood and roots could be related with the spread of the pathogen in Stand 1 (former pastureland). The average expansion rate of territorial clones of H. parviporum on Stand 2 and 3 (former meadows) (0.25 and 0.10 m·year−1) corresponds to results obtained by Bendz-Hellgren et al. [19], where the average H. annosum s.l. growth rate on former agricultural lands was 0.25 m·year−1 in spruce stump roots and 0.09 m·year−1 in living tree roots. The average H. parviporum growth rate in the Stand 1 (former pastureland) was high, 0.8 m·year−1, in comparison with results on both forest and arable lands reported by Bendz-Hellgren et al. [19]. This might indicate an erroneous assumption of infection year (i.e., infection had occurred before first thinning via wounding). Since no wounds were observed on trunks, current primary infections probably occurred via root injuries. Spores of Heterobasidion are present in soil, where they can maintain their vitality at least for a year and infect injured tree roots [32]. Rönnberg et al. [40] reported a high incidence of Heterobasidion root rot in unthinned spruce stands planted on pastureland. In addition, Vollbrecht and Agestam [28] and Capretti and Mugnai [26] indicated that former pastures were highly susceptible to root rot. Capretti and Mugnai [26] also concluded that Heterobasidion growth rate in dead wood was particularly high in pasture lands. The increased capacity of H. parviporum to colonise dead wood and form fruitbodies in Stand 1 of our study is a probable scenario, explaining the greater expansion of genets.
In research sites, stumps were not treated against Heterobasidion root rot, which in a short period resulted in severe damage as reported above. Therefore, we suggest that stump treatment should be considered as a general practice on former pastures and meadows to prevent both primary and subsequent infections, as suggested by other authors [41,43,62,64]. This is particularly relevant for private forest owners who are often managing forests on former agricultural lands, but often do not utilise preventive stump treatments.
Further studies should focus on the presence of Heterobasidion spores in soils of former agricultural lands in relation to the soil microorganism community and root injuries.

5. Conclusions

This study generated new data on the ecology and patterns of spread of Heterobasidion parviporum in Norway spruce stands on former pastures and meadows. From these novel data, we concluded the following: (i) on average, primary infection via spores in such stands is dominant, but secondary infection increases with stand age, (ii) H. parviporum can form large (up to 137 m2) territorial clones in forests on former pasture and meadow lands causing extensive tree dieback and mortality. Therefore, to reduce economic losses in spruce plantations on former pastures or meadows, stump treatment with biological or chemical control agents that prevent Heterobasidion infections should be considered in thinning operations. It is important to facilitate the implementation of stump treatment for private forest owners, who in many cases are owners of forests on former agricultural lands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K., T.G., and T.P.; methodology, D.K., T.P., L.B., A.Z., and K.P.; validation, L.B. and N.B.; formal analysis, D.K.; investigation, D.K.; data curation, D.K. and K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, T.G., T.P., A.Z., L.B., and N.B.; visualization, D.K.; supervision, T.G. and T.P.; project administration, D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Regional Development Fund’s Post-doctoral Research project No. 1.1.1.2/VIAA/2/18/298 “Determining the risk of Heterobasidion root-rot and fungal communities in roots of Norway spruce stands on former agricultural land”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and can be provided contacting corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Brigita Javoiša for assistance in the field and lab work, LSFRI Silava colleagues for soil analysis and assistance in Heterobasidion species detection, and Dainis Edgars Ruņģis for language revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forest Europe. State of Europe’s Forests 2015. Summary for Policy Makers. In Proceedings of the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Madrid, Spain, 20–21 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Korhonen, K.; Stenlid, J. Biology of Heterobasidion annosum. In Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hütermann, A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 43–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mańka, K.; Mańka, M. The control of fungal disease in forests planted on agricultural lands. In Proceedings of the XIII Czech and Slovak Plant Protection Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 12–15 September 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sierota, Z. Heterobasidion root rot in forests on former agricultural lands in Poland: Scale of threat and prevention. Sci. Res. Essays 2013, 8, 2298–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cukor, J.; Vacek, Z.; Linda, R.; Sharma, R.P.; Vacek, S. Afforested farmland vs. forestland: Effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Rytter, L.; Lutter, R. Early growth of different tree species on agricultural land along a latitudinal transect in Sweden. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2020, 93, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daugaviete, M.; Lazdina, D.; Bambe, B.; Lazdins, A.; Makovskis, K.; Daugavietis, U. Plantation Forests: A Guarantee of Sustainable Management of Abandoned and Marginal Farmlands. In Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Lighting—A Bet for the Future; Hermoso-Orzaez, M.J., Gago-Calderon, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vollbrecht, G.; Johansson, U.; Eriksson, H.; Stenlid, J. Butt rot incidence, yield and growth pattern in a tree species experiment in south western Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 1995, 76, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Piri, T. The spreading of the S type of Heterobasidion annosum from Norway spruce stumps to the subsequent tree stand. Eur. J. For. Path. 1996, 26, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Woodward, S.; Stenlid, J.; Karjalainen, R.; Huttermann, A. Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  11. Greig, B.J.W.; Gibbs, J.N.; Pratt, J.E. Experiments on the susceptibility of conifers to Heterobasidion annosum in Great Britain. For. Pathol. 2001, 31, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gonthier, P.; Brun, F.; Lione, G.; Nicolotti, G. Modelling the incidence of Heterobasidion annosum butt rots and related economic losses in alpine mixed naturally regenerated forests of northern Italy. For. Pathol. 2012, 42, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gonthier, P. Frequency of stump infections by Heterobasidion annosum s.l. and benefits from urea treatments vary with tree species and season in European Alpine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 434, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gaitnieks, T.; Arhipova, N.; Donis, J.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. Butt rot incidence and related losses in Latvian Picea abies (L.) Karst. stands. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Root and Butt Rot of Forest trees, Berkley, CA, USA, 12–19 August 2007; The University of California: Berkley, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 177–179. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arhipova, N.; Gaitnieks, T.; Donis, J.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. Butt rot incidence, causal fungi, and related yield loss in Picea abies stands of Latvia. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41, 2337–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Anonymous. Forest Industry in Numbers and Facts (Meža Nozare Skaitļos un Faktos); Biedrība “Zaļās Mājas”: Riga, Latvia, 2020. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Stenlid, J. Controlling and predicting the spread of Heterobasidion annosum from infected stumps and trees of Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 1987, 2, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vasiliauskas, R.; Stenlid, J. Spread of S and P group isolates of Heterobasidion annosum within and among Picea abies trees in central Lithuania. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28, 961–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bendz-Hellgren, M.; Brandtberg, P.-O.; Johansson, M.; Swedjemark, G.; Stenlid, J. Growth rate of Heterobasidion annosum in Picea abies established on forest land and arable land. Scand. J. For. Res. 1999, 14, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lygis, V.; Vasiliauskas, R.; Stenlid, J. Planting Betula pendula on pine sites infested by Heterobasidion annosum: Disease transfer, silvicultural evaluation, and community of wood-inhabiting fungi. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Piri, T.; Korhonen, K. The effect of winter thinning on the spread of Heterobasidion parviporum in Norway spruce stands. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 2589–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Allikmäe, E.; Laarmann, D.; Korjus, H. Vitality Assessment of Visually Healthy Trees in Estonia. Forests 2017, 8, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Vollbrecht, G.; Bilde Jørgensen, B. Modelling the incidence of butt rot in plantations of Picea abies in Denmark. Can. J. For. Res. 1995, 25, 1887–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Červinkova, H. Problems of decays of Norway spruce stands in the ČSSR. In Proceedings of the VIIIth Czechoslovak plant protection conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 9–11 September 1980; pp. 287–288. [Google Scholar]
  25. Capretti, P.; Moriondo, F. Danni in alcuni impianti di conifer associate alla presenza di Heterobasidion annosum (Fomes annosus). Phytopath. Medit. 1983, 22, 157–167. [Google Scholar]
  26. Capretti, P.; Mugnai, L. Saprophytic growth of Heterobasidion annosum on silver-fir logs interred in different types of forest soils. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1989, 19, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Graber, S. Die Kernfäuleschäden an Fichte (Picea abies Karst.) in der Schweiz nördlich der Alpen: Untersuchungen über das Schadenausmass, die ökologischen, waldbaulichen und mykologischen Einflussfaktoren sowie die ökonomischen Auswirkungen. Beih. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 1996, 79, 283. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vollbrecht, G.; Agestam, E. Modelling incidence of root rot in Picea abies plantations in Southern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 1995, 10, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mareš, R. The extent of root rot damage in Norway spruce stands established on fertile sites of former agricultural land. J. For. Sci. 2010, 56, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Froelich, R.C.; Dell, T.R.; Walkinshaw, C.H. Soil factores associated with Fomes annosus in the Gulf states. For. Sci. 1966, 12, 356–361. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dmitri, L. Influence of nutrition and application of fertilizers on the resistance of forest plants to fungal diseases. Eur. J. For. Path. 1977, 7, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brūna, L.; Kļaviņa, D.; Korhonen, K.; Zaļuma, A.; Burņeviča, N.; Gaitnieks, T. Effect of soil properties on the spread of Heterobasidion root rot. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. Sect. B Nat. Exact Appl. Sci. 2019, 73, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Manka, K. Some investigations on Fomes annosus Fr. carried out in Poland. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fomes annosus, Aarhus, Denmark, 29 July–3 August 1968; Hodges, C.S., Rishbeth, J., Yde-Andersen, A., Eds.; USDA Forest Service: Asherville, NC, USA, 1970; pp. 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gaitnieks, T.; Arhipova, N.; Nikolajeva, V.; Vulfa, L.; Klavina, D. Heterobasidion annosum izraisītā egļu sakņu trupe lauksaimniecības zemēs. (Heterobasidion annosum root rot of Norway spruce in agricultural soils). Mežzinātne 2008, 17, 22–37. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  35. Vasiliauskas, A. Root Fungus (Heterobasidion annosum) and the Resistance of Coniferous Forest Ecosystems; Mokslas Publishers: Vilnius, Lithuania, 1989. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Pešková, V.; Soukup, F.; Landa, J. Comparison of mycobiota of diverse aged spruce stands on former agricultural soil. J. For. Sci. 2009, 55, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pratt, J.E.; Greig, B.J.W. Heterobasidion annosum: Development of butt rot following thinning in two young first rotation stands of Norway spruce. Forestry 1988, 61, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vollbrecht, G.; Gemmel, P.; Pettersson, N. The effect of precommercial thinning on the incidence of Heterobasidion annosum in planted Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 1995, 10, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rönnberg, J.; Jørgensen, B.B. Incidence of root and butt rot in consecutive rotations of Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 2000, 15, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rönnberg, J.; Berglund, M.; Johansson, U.; Cleary, M. Incidence of Heterobasidion spp. following different thinning regimes in Norway spruce in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 289, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thor, M.; Stenlid, J. Heterobasidion annosum infection of Picea abies following manual or mechanized stump treatment. Scand. J. For. Res. 2005, 20, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stenlid, J.; Redfern, D.B. Spread within the tree and stand. In Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hütterman, A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 125–143. [Google Scholar]
  43. Garbelotto, M.; Gonthier, P. Biology, epidemiology, and control of Heterobasidion species worldwide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Swedjemark, G.; Stenlid, J. Population dynamics of the root rot fungus Heterobasidion annosum following thinning of Picea abies. Oikos 1993, 66, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zaļuma, A.; Muižnieks, I.; Gaitnieks, T.; Burņeviča, N.; Jansons, Ā.; Jansons, J.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. Infection and spread of root rot caused by Heterobasidion spp. in Pinus contorta plantations in Northern Europe: Three case studies. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 48, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Stenlid, J. Population structure of Heterobasidion annosum as determined by somatic incompatibility, sexual incompatibility and isozyme patterns. Can. J. Bot. 1985, 63, 2268–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hantula, J.; Vainio, E. Specific primers for the differentiation of Heterobasidion annosum (s.str.) and H. parviporum infected stumps in northern Europe. Silva Fenn. 2003, 37, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kåren, O.; Högberg, N.; Dahlberg, A.; Jonsson, L.; Nylund, J.E. Inter- and intraspecific variation in the ITS region of rDNA of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Fennoscandia as detected by endonuclease analysis. New Phytol. 1997, 136, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mead, R.; Curnow, R.N. Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bates, D.; Maechler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Royston, P. An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Appl. Stat. 1982, 31, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Labouriau, R. postHoc: Tools for Post-Hoc Analysis. R Package Version 0.1.3. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=postHoc (accessed on 10 January 2020).
  53. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 10 January 2020).
  54. Pettersson, M.; Rönnberg, J.; Vollbrecht, G.; Gemmel, P. Effect of thinning and Phlebiopsis gigantea stump treatment on the growth of Heterobasidion parviporum inoculated in Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 2003, 18, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thor, M.; Arlinger, J.; Stenlid, J. Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies: Modelling economic outcomes of stump treatment in Scandinavian coniferous forests. Scand. J. For. Res. 2006, 21, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Korhonen, K.; Piri, T. How cultivate Norway spruce on site infested by Heterobasidion? In Proceedings of the Nordic/Baltic Forest Pathology Meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, 31 August–4 September 2002; Thomsen, I.M., Ed.; Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute: Horsholm, Denmark, 2003; pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  57. Klavina, D.; Menkis, A.; Gaitnieks, T.; Velmala, S.; Lazdins, A.; Rajala, T.; Pennanen, T. Analysis of Norway spruce dieback phenomenon in Latvia—A belowground perspective. Scand. J. For. Res. 2016, 31, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Piri, T. Silvicultural Control of Heterobasidion Root Rot in Norway Spruce Forests in Southern Finland. Regeneration and Vitality Fertilization of Infected Stands. Ph.D. Thesis, Finnish Forest Research Institute METLA, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  59. Varese, G.C.; Gonthier, P.; Nicolotti, G. Long-term effects on other fungi are studied in biological and chemical stump treatments in the fight against Heterobasidion annosum coll. Mycologia 2003, 95, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Vollbrecht, G.; Bilde Jørgensen, B. The effect of stump treatment on the spread rate of butt rot in Picea abies in Danish permanent forest yield research plots, Scand. J. For. Res. 1995, 10, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Oliva, J.; Samils, N.; Johansson, U.; Bendz-Hellgren, M.; Stenlid, J. Urea treatment reduced Heterobasidion annosum s.l. root rot in Picea abies after 15 years. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 2876–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Blomquist, M.; Larsson-Herrera, S.; Hofmann, J.; Ceyd Beram, R.; Cleary, M.; Rönnberg, J. Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 462, 117998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Brandtberg, P.-O.; Johansson, M.; Seeger, P. Effects of season and urea treatment on infection of stumps of Picea abies by Heterobasidion annosum in stands on former arable land. Scand. J. For. Res. 1996, 11, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Oliva, J.; Thor, M.; Stenlid, J. Long-term effects of mechanized stump treatment against Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40, 1020–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Niemelä, T.; Korhonen, K. Taxonomy of the genus Heterobasidion. In Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hütterman, A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hanso, S.; Korhonen, K.; Hanso, M. Attack of spruce and pine by S and P groups of Heterobasidion annosum on forest and former agricultural soils in Estonia. In Root and Butt Rots, Proceedings of the IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01, Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland, 9–16 August 1993; Johansson, M., Stenlid, J., Eds.; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994; pp. 254–259. [Google Scholar]
  67. Korhonen, K.; Piri, T. The main hosts and distribution of S and P groups of Heterobasidion annosum in Finland. In Root and Butt Rots, Proceedings of the IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01, Wik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland, 9–16 August 1993; Johansson, M., Stenlid, J., Eds.; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994; pp. 260–267. [Google Scholar]
  68. Piri, T.; Korhonen, K. Infection of advance regeneration of Norway spruce by Heterobasidion parviporum. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Piri, T.; Valkonen, S. Incidence and spread of Heterobasidion root rot in uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. Can. J. For. Res. 2013, 43, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Piri, T. Early development of root rot in young Norway spruce planted on sites infected by Heterobasidion in southern Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 604–611, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oliva, J.; Bendz-Hellgren, M.; Stenlid, J. Spread of Heterobasidion annosum s.s. and Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies 15 years after stump inoculation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 75, 414–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Korhonen, K.; Bobko, I.; Hanso, S.; Piri, T.; Vasiliauskas, A. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum in some spruce and pine stands in Byelorussia, Lithuania and Estonia. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1992, 22, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Piri, T.; Korhonen, K.; Sairanen, A. Occurrence of Heterobasidion annosum in pure and mixed spruce stands in Southern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 1990, 5, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Keca, N.; Keca, L. Distribution of Heterobasidion parviporum genets in Norway spruce forests in Serbia. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference: Root and Butt Rot of Forest Trees, Firenze, Italy, 4–10 September 2011; Carpetti, P., Comparini, M., La Porta, N., Santini, A., Eds.; Firenze University Press: Firenze, Italy, 2013; pp. 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  75. Piri, T.; Hamberg, L. Persistence and infectivity of Heterobasidion parviporum in Norway spruce root residuals following stump harvesting. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 353, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 12 00070 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the study sites in the central part of Latvia.
Figure 1. Location of the study sites in the central part of Latvia.
Forests 12 00070 g001
Table
Table 1. Description of Norway spruce stands selected for the study: general information, forest characteristics, and details of sampling area and soil parameters.
Table 1. Description of Norway spruce stands selected for the study: general information, forest characteristics, and details of sampling area and soil parameters.
Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3
General information
Location56°84′ N, 23°77′ E56°38′ N, 23°12′ E56°82′ N, 24°07′ E
MunicipalityBabiteAuceOlaine
Altitude, m178513
Annual rainfall, mm600–650550–600650–700
Forest data
Total area, ha8.72.751.54
Age, years738252
Average height, m27.128.823.5
DBH, cm353024
Yield per ha342387268
Forest typeVacciniosa mel.Myrtillosa mel.Oxalidosa
Thinning years *2007, 20151991, 20011987, 2017
Previous land usePasturelandWet meadowMeadow
Other tree species (<5% admixture)Betula pendulaPopulus tremulaPinus sylvestris
Sampling area
Length of transect, m500400250
Area of transect, m21000800500
Total No. of circle sample plots1165
Total area of circles, m2345418841570
Soil
pH (KCl)4.15.94.6
C, (g/kg)146103106
N, (g/kg)7.68.57.5
P, (g/kg)0.030.060.03
K, (g/kg)0.020.050.02
Ca, (g/kg)4.48.96.9
Mg, (g/kg)0.160.880.25
* All stands were thinned twice. No data of the exact thinning period and season is available.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics and dieback rate in Norway spruce stands on former pastures (Stand 1) and meadows (Stands 2 and 3). (T—transect; C—disease centres (circular sample plots).
Table 2. Characteristics and dieback rate in Norway spruce stands on former pastures (Stand 1) and meadows (Stands 2 and 3). (T—transect; C—disease centres (circular sample plots).
Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3
TCTCTC
Living trees
Total number *7295257334153
Number per hectare720275313387680975
Dead trees
Total number *8411037829
Number per hectare80119125196160185
Stumps
Total numbern.d.142n.d.96n.d.98
No. of 1st thinning stumpsn.d.65n.d.45n.d.29
No. of 2nd thinning stumpsn.d.75n.d.39n.d.69
No. of other stumps **n.d.2n.d.12n.d.-
Number per hectaren.d.411n.d.510n.d.624
* Several trees were present in both transect and disease centre. ** Category “other stumps” includes trees broken at different heights.
Table
Table 3. Frequency (% *) of Norway spruce trees or stumps infected by Heterobasidion parviporum in managed forests on former pastures and meadows.
Table 3. Frequency (% *) of Norway spruce trees or stumps infected by Heterobasidion parviporum in managed forests on former pastures and meadows.
Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3
Transect; %16.328.633.3
Living trees; %12.525.723.8
Dead trees; %3.82.99.5
Disease Centres; %33.541.338.6
Living trees; %11.515.518.9
Dead trees; %8.67.35.4
Stumps; %13.318.414.3
Total; %29.638.538.9
* Percentage expresses the proportion of trees/stumps where Heterobasidion parviporum was detected of all trees/stumps sampled.
Table
Table 4. Distribution pattern and characteristics of Heterobasidion parviporum genets in disease centres of managed Norway spruce stands on former pasture and meadows.
Table 4. Distribution pattern and characteristics of Heterobasidion parviporum genets in disease centres of managed Norway spruce stands on former pasture and meadows.
Stand 1Stand 2Stand 3
Genets including one tree/stump
Infection per hectare38143376
  • Trees infected
3564274
  • Stumps infected
379102
Frequency (%)21%25%56%
Genets including two or more trees/stumps
Number of trees and stumps per genet (min.-max.)4.8 (2–12)4.4 (2–11)2.6 (2–7)
Infection per hectare170302293
  • Trees infected
120185191
  • Stumps infected
50117102
Distance among trees and (or) stumps, m
  • Mean ± SE
9.6 ± 1.76.9 ±1.03.1 ± 0.5
  • Min.-max.
1.8–18.02.1–14.61.0–6.9
Area, m2
  • Mean ± SE
56.4 ± 19.712.4 ± 4.95.9 ± 2.9
  • Min.-max.
1.2–137.40.3–52.21.3–17.3
Frequency (%)79%75%44%
Total infection per hectare208445669
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klavina, D.; Bruna, L.; Zaluma, A.; Burnevica, N.; Polmanis, K.; Gaitnieks, T.; Piri, T. Infection and Spread of Root Rot Caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies Stands after Thinning: Case Studies on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands. Forests 2021, 12, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010070

AMA Style

Klavina D, Bruna L, Zaluma A, Burnevica N, Polmanis K, Gaitnieks T, Piri T. Infection and Spread of Root Rot Caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies Stands after Thinning: Case Studies on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands. Forests. 2021; 12(1):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klavina, Darta, Lauma Bruna, Astra Zaluma, Natalija Burnevica, Kaspars Polmanis, Talis Gaitnieks, and Tuula Piri. 2021. "Infection and Spread of Root Rot Caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies Stands after Thinning: Case Studies on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands" Forests 12, no. 1: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010070

APA Style

Klavina, D., Bruna, L., Zaluma, A., Burnevica, N., Polmanis, K., Gaitnieks, T., & Piri, T. (2021). Infection and Spread of Root Rot Caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies Stands after Thinning: Case Studies on Former Pasture and Meadow Lands. Forests, 12(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12010070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop